X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jul 15 09:30:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A5D2D4A.2090007@post.pl>
References: <4f045a880907141805v60116b6agabbc1f2b237248ef@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A5D2D4A.2090007@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:30:23 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0907150030o1af53f5cy4a283751d8091cc3@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  > All that said,
	consider Deacon and how he didn't loose
	anything by > abandoning Calgacus account. Btw, did he disclose his
	former account in > his RfA? No. He didn't disclose anything about his
	former account. I think it's safe to say his ethnic based insults and
	flaming would have hurt his RfA if presented. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Giano_II
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  > All that said, consider Deacon and how he didn't loose
	anything by > abandoning Calgacus account. Btw, did he disclose his
	former account in > his RfA? No. He didn't disclose anything about his
	former account. I think it's safe to say his ethnic based insults and
	flaming would have hurt his RfA if presented. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

> All that said, consider Deacon and how he didn't loose anything by
> abandoning Calgacus account. Btw, did he disclose his former account in
> his RfA?

No. He didn't disclose anything about his former account. I think it's
safe to say his ethnic based insults and flaming would have hurt his
RfA if presented.

2009/7/15 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> Martin wrote:
>> Some of us have probably heard of the antics of Giano (seems to be an
>> ally of Bishonen) and his huge block log. Now it seems that he has
>> openly returned as GiacomoReturned with a clean block without any
>> trouble, see:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Giano_II
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GiacomoReturned
>>
>> Seems to me it is quite permissible to return with a new username, so
>> long as there is no active sanction in place and the user clearly
>> links the new and old accounts. Thoughts?
>
> It is permissable. Two problems are:
> * if you don't disclose it when applying for adminship or similar
> function, this can look bad for obvious reasons
> * if it is disclosed later, you are kind of back to square one
>
> All that said, consider Deacon and how he didn't loose anything by
> abandoning Calgacus account. Btw, did he disclose his former account in
> his RfA?
>
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

