X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 24 00:39:52 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <102037.36280.qm@web45101.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
References: <102037.36280.qm@web45101.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:39:41 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906231539l450cb339n6e3005dd71c1448f@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I've tried being nice to him in the past and it didn't
	work. I think he takes it as a sign of weakness. Radek 2009/6/23 Jack
	<jacurek@yahoo.com>: > I'm trying to reach out to Skapperod peaceful
	way
	but looks like he is > rather insisting on his B.S. Perhaps your way is
	better Radek and you should > do it. > Jacek > --- On Tue, 6/23/09,
	radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [WPM] And another Skapperod
	deletions > To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net> >
	Date:
	Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 1:55 PM > > Also, I'm seeing quite a number of
	what look like copyvios on the > Expulsion of Germans article,
	particularly from the Spiegel article > and the Gibney book. I'm
	wondering if there is in fact a lot more, if > I shouldn't try to pull a
	Novickas and get MoonriddenGirl or somebody > to put the whole article
	behind an ugly black copyvio template. Then > either Skapperod will
	have
	to spend a lot of time cleaning it up, or > I can do it, removing some
	of the more egregious POV along the way.. > > Radek > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] And another Skapperod deletions
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I've tried being nice to him in the past and it didn't
	work. I think he takes it as a sign of weakness. Radek 2009/6/23 Jack
	<jacurek@yahoo.com>: > I'm trying to reach out to Skapperod peaceful way
	but looks like he is > rather insisting on his B.S. Perhaps your way is
	better Radek and you should > do it. > Jacek > --- On Tue, 6/23/09,
	radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [WPM] And another Skapperod
	deletions > To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net> > Date:
	Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 1:55 PM > > Also, I'm seeing quite a number of
	what look like copyvios on the > Expulsion of Germans article,
	particularly from the Spiegel article > and the Gibney book. I'm
	wondering if there is in fact a lot more, if > I shouldn't try to pull a
	Novickas and get MoonriddenGirl or somebody > to put the whole article
	behind an ugly black copyvio template. Then > either Skapperod will have
	to spend a lot of time cleaning it up, or > I can do it, removing some
	of the more egregious POV along the way.. > > Radek > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I've tried being nice to him in the past and it didn't work. I think
he takes it as a sign of weakness.

Radek


2009/6/23 Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>:
> I'm trying to reach out to Skapperod peaceful way but looks like he is
> rather insisting on his B.S. Perhaps your way is better Radek and you sho=
uld
> do it.
> Jacek
> --- On Tue, 6/23/09, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [WPM] And another Skapperod deletions
> To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
> Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 1:55 PM
>
> Also, I'm seeing quite a number of what look like copyvios on the
> Expulsion of Germans article, particularly from the Spiegel article
> and the Gibney book. I'm wondering if there is in fact a lot more, if
> I shouldn't try to pull a Novickas and get MoonriddenGirl or somebody
> to put the whole article behind an ugly black copyvio template. Then
> either Skapperod=A0 will have to spend a lot of time cleaning it up, or
> I can do it, removing some of the more egregious POV along the way..
>
> Radek
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

