X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 15 06:21:20 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4fbe29dd0906141145l1a2aa3d9s6b5ccd601bace37c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cb7.52bcdb6b.37668772@aol.com>
	<4fbe29dd0906141145l1a2aa3d9s6b5ccd601bace37c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:21:00 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0906142121i63d217aao7740be89325caf2@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  The problem is, it's only happy 72 hours. But still, 
	that's just excellent! We need but a few more of this and to present
	them the way Peters said. Perhaps step 2 (or 3) can be about PU's
	message on Andrei's talk page? Whatever warning, restriction, topic ban,
	personal message ban he gets is perfect. We just need to accumulate
	these things. But the matter of Andrei's talk page is very serious, and
	we can always claim PU received insufficient punishment for it.
	Congratulations so far! [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Well done!
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1731539650967231738=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  The problem is, it's only happy 72 hours. But still,
	that's just excellent! We need but a few more of this and to present
	them the way Peters said. Perhaps step 2 (or 3) can be about PU's
	message on Andrei's talk page? Whatever warning, restriction, topic ban,
	personal message ban he gets is perfect. We just need to accumulate
	these things. But the matter of Andrei's talk page is very serious, and
	we can always claim PU received insufficient punishment for it.
	Congratulations so far! [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0004]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1731539650967231738==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64c1be8b96528046c5b6245

--0016e64c1be8b96528046c5b6245
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The problem is, it's only happy 72 hours. But still, that's just excellent!
We need but a few more of this and to present them the way Peters said.
Perhaps step 2 (or 3) can be about PU's message on Andrei's talk page?
Whatever warning, restriction, topic ban, personal message ban he gets is
perfect. We just need to accumulate these things. But the matter of Andrei'=
s
talk page is very serious, and we can always claim PU received insufficient
punishment for it. Congratulations so far!

2009/6/14 Sander S=E4de <sander.sade@gmail.com>

>
> Oh happy days...<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Pa=
sswordUsername&diff=3D296395767&oldid=3D296369700>
>
> Sander
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0016e64c1be8b96528046c5b6245
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The problem is, it&#39;s only happy 72 hours. But still, that&#39;s just ex=
cellent! We need but a few more of this and to present them the way Peters =
said. Perhaps step 2 (or 3) can be about PU&#39;s message on Andrei&#39;s t=
alk page? Whatever warning, restriction, topic ban, personal message ban he=
 gets is perfect. We just need to accumulate these things. But the matter o=
f Andrei&#39;s talk page is very serious, and we can always claim PU receiv=
ed insufficient punishment for it. Congratulations so far!<br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/6/14 Sander S=E4de <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:sander.sade@gmail.com">sander.sade@gmail.com</a>&gt;</s=
pan><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border=
-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br><a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Passwo=
rdUsername&amp;diff=3D296395767&amp;oldid=3D296369700" target=3D"_blank">Oh=
 happy days...</a><br><font color=3D"#888888"><br>Sander<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e64c1be8b96528046c5b6245--


--===============1731539650967231738==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1731539650967231738==--


