X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:33:45 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211428y5ea28c88wafdde68863c6a2bd@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3EA461.2050208@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906211423x2123ead9v1da04a5fa7e3242c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211428y5ea28c88wafdde68863c6a2bd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:33:33 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211433t62c6e753u9887a81dbc24f5b9@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Neither Cbrown1023 or Rlevse are active. I've got
	mixed
	feelings about AGK too but he's at least familiar with the Deacon case.
	Other possibilities are Ryan Postlewaite (my time zone), Tiptoety
	(California, 8 hours), Nixeagle (New York, 6 hours) - whom I only recall
	from somewhere but don't know his attitudes. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Neither Cbrown1023 or Rlevse are active. I've got mixed
	feelings about AGK too but he's at least familiar with the Deacon case.
	Other possibilities are Ryan Postlewaite (my time zone), Tiptoety
	(California, 8 hours), Nixeagle (New York, 6 hours) - whom I only recall
	from somewhere but don't know his attitudes. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Neither Cbrown1023 or Rlevse are active. I've got mixed feelings about
AGK too but he's at least familiar with the Deacon case. Other
possibilities are Ryan Postlewaite (my time zone), Tiptoety
(California, 8 hours), Nixeagle (New York, 6 hours) - whom I only
recall from somewhere but don't know his attitudes.


2009/6/21 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:23, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 1. Contact a ArbCom clerk and ask about the moving of other admin's
>> comments w/o proving he is involved. Would AGK be a good person here?
>
> I'm not sure. =A0I have vague uneasy memories about AGK.
> Of clerks, Cbrown1023 and Rlevse seem appropriate. =A0Check out which one=
 is
> likely to be available. =A0Asking an arbitrator directly might not be a b=
ad
> idea, either; I recommend Newyorkbrad, who is most lawyer-like of the
> current arbitrators. =A0Might have something to do with his being a lawye=
r.
>>
>> 2. I have less experience with ANI threads so probably someone else
>> should file this one.
>
> AN/I threads are very informal. =A0They aren't "filed" as in arbitration;
> instead, they're "started". =A0This kind of thread consists of a brief su=
mmary
> of what happened, a diff or two, and asking that other people "look into
> it", or "clarify the relevant policy". =A0Since you're not involved in the
> question of whether Piotrus is involved ;) you won't even have to
> participate in the following discussion (but you can).
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

