X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 29 14:47:23 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <166060.56617.qm@web32805.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <166060.56617.qm@web32805.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:47:07 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906290547y6e7bfe74jd465952c5a87297f@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I think it's because Wikipedia is essentially 1) nerdy
	(in a good way) and 2) combative (despite what they keep telling us).
	My
	wife seems to see it as "one of those things guys just do" - she gets
	annoyed if I spent too much time on it, which I do, but she also likes
	hearing about the articles I'm editing and the struggles that go on
	("which faction are you warring with now? Who are they aligned with?
	How
	is that strategy going to work? Did you get that guy banned?") but she
	might be just showing supportive, though fake, interest. She's also sort
	of one of those sociology types so she's into the whole issue of how
	knowledge is created, disseminated and manipulated, how "facts" are
	framed and presented and so on (overall that kind of approach is a bit
	too "post-modern" for me, but there's some truth to it). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Women and Wiklp
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I think it's because Wikipedia is essentially 1) nerdy
	(in a good way) and 2) combative (despite what they keep telling us). My
	wife seems to see it as "one of those things guys just do" - she gets
	annoyed if I spent too much time on it, which I do, but she also likes
	hearing about the articles I'm editing and the struggles that go on
	("which faction are you warring with now? Who are they aligned with? How
	is that strategy going to work? Did you get that guy banned?") but she
	might be just showing supportive, though fake, interest. She's also sort
	of one of those sociology types so she's into the whole issue of how
	knowledge is created, disseminated and manipulated, how "facts" are
	framed and presented and so on (overall that kind of approach is a bit
	too "post-modern" for me, but there's some truth to it). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I think it's because Wikipedia is essentially 1) nerdy (in a good way)
and 2) combative (despite what they keep telling us). My wife seems to
see it as "one of those things guys just do" - she gets annoyed if I
spent too much time on it, which I do, but she also likes hearing
about the articles I'm editing and the struggles that go on ("which
faction are you warring with now? Who are they aligned with? How is
that strategy going to work? Did you get that guy banned?") but she
might be just showing supportive, though fake, interest.
She's also sort of one of those sociology types so she's into the
whole issue of how knowledge is created, disseminated and manipulated,
how "facts" are framed and presented and so on (overall that kind of
approach is a bit too "post-modern" for me, but there's some truth to
it).

Radek

2009/6/28 piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>:
> Sorry, I messed it up, my hand slipped, and I accidentally pressed send.
>
> Has anybody ever wondered why there are so few female editors? I do not keep
> tabs, but my hunch is that some 90% of editors are men. Why is that? Or
> perhaps they share my wife's opinion, she says that instead of Wikipedia, I
> should do something useful, and is often pissed off when she sees me writing
> stuff for the project
>
> Sorry again for the mistake, my bad
> Tymek
>
> --- On Sun, 6/28/09, piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> From: piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>
> Subject: [WPM] Women and Wiklp
> To: folks@wikipedometer.net
> Date: Sunday, June 28, 2009, 10:29 PM
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

