X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 30 21:27:24 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906301222rd9d3ed9of09d6ecb50b3c4cb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0906300904t384ebb5am2ede38d7e66a4ab9@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906301012j409d647ase141500b92793f75@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906301222rd9d3ed9of09d6ecb50b3c4cb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:27:15 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0906301227j2e0595d5idd5d8576478f1407@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Let's wait month or two,
	while giving support on Wiki. I
	am on the side of being cautious since bad choice would mean disaster
	for the list. 2009/6/30 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>: > On
	Skap/Loosemark someone should bring up that Skapperod himself has >
	been
	edit warring recently at various articles, including violating > 3RR at
	Kolobrzeg: >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=295219397#Sk.C3.A4pper.C3.B6d_reported_by_Radeksz_.28Result:_.29
	> Other examples can probably be found (though not of 3RR). > > Radek >
	> 2009/6/30 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>: >> Common strategy of
	his;Woogie, Xx223 and me were harassed continuosly >> on AE when
	Skapperod couldn't force his POV >> >> 2009/6/30 radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com>: >>>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=299525735&oldid=299492193#Loosmark
	>>> >>> We really need to do something about Skapperod. >>> >>> >>>
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list >>> folks@wikipedometer.net >>>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >>> >> >> >>
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Skapperod is going after Loosmark at AE
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Let's wait month or two, while giving support on Wiki. I
	am on the side of being cautious since bad choice would mean disaster
	for the list. 2009/6/30 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>: > On
	Skap/Loosemark someone should bring up that Skapperod himself has > been
	edit warring recently at various articles, including violating > 3RR at
	Kolobrzeg: >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=295219397#Sk.C3.A4pper.C3.B6d_reported_by_Radeksz_.28Result:_.29
	> Other examples can probably be found (though not of 3RR). > > Radek >
	> 2009/6/30 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>: >> Common strategy of
	his;Woogie, Xx223 and me were harassed continuosly >> on AE when
	Skapperod couldn't force his POV >> >> 2009/6/30 radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com>: >>>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=299525735&oldid=299492193#Loosmark
	>>> >>> We really need to do something about Skapperod. >>> >>> >>>
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list >>> folks@wikipedometer.net >>>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >>> >> >> >>
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Let's wait month or two, while giving support on Wiki. I am on the
side of being cautious since bad choice would mean disaster for the
list.

2009/6/30 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>:
> On Skap/Loosemark someone should bring up that Skapperod himself has
> been edit warring recently at various articles, including violating
> 3RR at Kolobrzeg:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=295219397#Sk.C3.A4pper.C3.B6d_reported_by_Radeksz_.28Result:_.29
> Other examples can probably be found (though not of 3RR).
>
> Radek
>
> 2009/6/30 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>:
>> Common strategy of his;Woogie, Xx223 and me were harassed continuosly
>> on AE when Skapperod couldn't force his POV
>>
>> 2009/6/30 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>:
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=299525735&oldid=299492193#Loosmark
>>>
>>> We really need to do something about Skapperod.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

