X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Mar 25 22:18:20 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f826636f0903251306o1437880foa49f7db176438906@mail.gmail.com>
References: <855174.24246.qm@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<49C94336.7080000@post.pl>
	<f826636f0903251306o1437880foa49f7db176438906@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:18:08 +0200
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0903251418x1181c172y4a62fc375b965b6e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  2009/3/25 Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com> >
	what? I thought biophys was reading this all along... > No, he wasn't.
	Off-wiki contact with Biophys failed, as he refused mail-based
	communication. Accordingly, to the best of my knowledge, he doesn't even
	know our list exists. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Biophys & off-topic request
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8943897042855027237=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.8
X-Spam_score_int: 18
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  2009/3/25 Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com> >
	what? I thought biophys was reading this all along... > No, he wasn't.
	Off-wiki contact with Biophys failed, as he refused mail-based
	communication. Accordingly, to the best of my knowledge, he doesn't even
	know our list exists. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.5000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8943897042855027237==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5bdc4449ec60465f8091f

--001636c5bdc4449ec60465f8091f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2009/3/25 Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>

> what? I thought biophys was reading this all along...
>

No, he wasn't.  Off-wiki contact with Biophys failed, as he refused
mail-based communication.  Accordingly, to the best of my knowledge, he
doesn't even know our list exists.

However, Biophys has since then activated the MediaWiki email feature, so I
guess we're now able to privately invite him, unless anybody objects.

Andres, could you please remind us how many (and who) we are. Did we reach
> at least 10?
>

* Alexia Death
* Biruitorul
* Digwuren
* Dc76
* Hillock65
* Martintg
* Miacek
* Molobo
* Vecrumba
* Piotrus

Some of us are silent, however.  I don't even remember when Molobo said
anything, for example.

We used to have Sander S=C3=A4de, but since he did not react in any way to =
the
outgoing mail, nor was he available via IRC, I assumed the mail address I
had for him had become stale, so I removed him until we know of a better
channel.  Suva might be interested, but he prefers IRC to email
communication.

any idea why he declined?
>

He didn't decline as such; he displayed an unusually high level of
suspicion, and I didn't push it.  It'd probably be better if somebody else
asked him the next time.

> I think Biophys should've been invited long ago. He's a bit odd (well,
>> that's hardly unique on Wikipedia), but seems to share our agenda in ful=
l.
>> And losing him would be a big negative, so anything to keep him on board=
 is
>> worth trying.
>>
>
Agenda?  I'm unconvinced of that.  But he shares a lot of our worldview, an=
d
has a healthy distrust of all forms of propaganda I know.  I believe we can
work collegially together with him.

--=20
Andres Soolo

--001636c5bdc4449ec60465f8091f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/3/25 Dorin Cheptea <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a=
 href=3D"mailto:dorin.cheptea@gmail.com">dorin.cheptea@gmail.com</a>&gt;</s=
pan><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border=
-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>what? I thought biophys was reading this all along...</div></blockquot=
e><div><br></div><div>No, he wasn&#39;t. =C2=A0Off-wiki contact with Biophy=
s failed, as he refused mail-based communication. =C2=A0Accordingly, to the=
 best of my knowledge, he doesn&#39;t even know our list exists.</div>
<div><br></div><div>However, Biophys has since then activated the MediaWiki=
 email feature, so I guess we&#39;re now able to privately invite him, unle=
ss anybody objects.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>Andres, could you please remind us how many (and who)=C2=A0we are. Did=
 we reach at least 10?</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>* Alexia Death=
</div><div>* Biruitorul</div><div>* Digwuren</div><div>* Dc76</div><div>* H=
illock65</div>
<div>* Martintg</div><div>* Miacek</div><div>* Molobo</div><div>* Vecrumba<=
/div><div>* Piotrus</div><div><br></div><div>Some of us are silent, however=
. =C2=A0I don&#39;t even remember when Molobo said anything, for example.</=
div>
<div><br></div><div>We used to have Sander S=C3=A4de, but since he did not =
react in any way to the outgoing mail, nor was he available via IRC, I assu=
med the mail address I had for him had become stale, so I removed him until=
 we know of a better channel. =C2=A0Suva might be interested, but he prefer=
s IRC to email communication.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div></div>
<div>any idea why he declined?</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>He did=
n&#39;t decline as such; he displayed an unusually high level of suspicion,=
 and I didn&#39;t push it. =C2=A0It&#39;d probably be better if somebody el=
se asked him the next time.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><=
div><div class=3D"h5"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"padding-le=
ft:1ex;margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:#ccc 1px solid">
<div>&gt; I think Biophys should&#39;ve been invited long ago. He&#39;s a b=
it odd (well, that&#39;s hardly unique on Wikipedia), but seems to share ou=
r agenda in full. And losing him would be a big negative, so anything to ke=
ep him on board is worth trying.</div>
</blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Agenda? =C2=
=A0I&#39;m unconvinced of that. =C2=A0But he shares a lot of our worldview,=
 and has a healthy distrust of all forms of propaganda I know. =C2=A0I beli=
eve we can work collegially together with him.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5bdc4449ec60465f8091f--


--===============8943897042855027237==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8943897042855027237==--


