X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Apr  7 09:30:26 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <49DADE35.5090707@post.pl>
References: <49D6F9F8.3030603@post.pl> <49DA4A96.40806@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0904061136n4070fa1eg3a31d606a7bba79a@mail.gmail.com>
	<49DADE35.5090707@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:30:12 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880904070030o4275f21g98ba9f0874534464@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Looking at the AE noticeboard you linked to below,
	I see
	Deacon mentioned your recent closure of a 3RR report on behalf of your
	colleague:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=268517532
	[...] Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon versus Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Looking at the AE noticeboard you linked to below, I see
	Deacon mentioned your recent closure of a 3RR report on behalf of your
	colleague:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=268517532
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Looking at the AE noticeboard you linked to below,  I see Deacon
mentioned your recent closure of a 3RR report on behalf of your
colleague:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=268517532

Do you think Deacon may attempt to exploit this in an upcoming arbcom
case you speak of?

Martin


On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
> More developments: I started a thread at AE against an irritating but
> not very active troll, Dr. Dan:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#Dr._Dan
> Deacon immediately appeared and started changing the focus: despite the
> new AE format requiring the discussion to be about Dr. Dan, he created a
> large thread about Polish editor Radeksz. I've now split this part of
> the discussion into a separate section, which I expect he will try to
> revert. If and when he does so, it would be bad style for me to revert
> but if other editors could come into the discussion, restore the heading
>  (this is how it looks in the version with my subheading:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&oldid=282275111#Off-topic_discussion_concerning_Radeksz)
> and comment that the entire Radeksz discussion is off topic and
> irrelevant, this would be appreciated. Deacon in the past has gotten
> into revert wars about headings and such on AE / ANI and similar pages,
> and another example of him warring on (disrupting...) such pages would
> be useful in the upcoming arbcom case.
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

