X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul  4 01:39:38 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f826636f0907031633k14728337sfa20bc7a8367e8f9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0907031517taba84aaodd143d82c724e8db@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0907031633k14728337sfa20bc7a8367e8f9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:39:27 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907031639h19715086y5d9533e5add2fb37@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Offliner already showed up and I made a short reply
	but
	will probably leave it at that. I've emailed Thatcher quite a number of
	times since the restriction so it probably is a good idea to hold off.
	Wait until he comments first. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appeal
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4553191943712883074=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Offliner already showed up and I made a short reply but
	will probably leave it at that. I've emailed Thatcher quite a number of
	times since the restriction so it probably is a good idea to hold off.
	Wait until he comments first. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4553191943712883074==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e642dd64c9e9e6046dd5aaa5

--0016e642dd64c9e9e6046dd5aaa5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Offliner already showed up and I made a short reply but will probably leave
it at that. I've emailed Thatcher quite a number of times since the
restriction so it probably is a good idea to hold off. Wait until he
comments first.


Radek


2009/7/3 Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>

> voluntarily 1rr was a very good thing you did. i'd abstain from commenting,
> so that not to invite somebody from the cartel. the comments so far seem
> favorable to you. good luck.
> IMHO, Colchicum and Martintg should do the same.
>
> Can anyone provide me again with the diffs of stalking biophys (revealing
> his real identity). I remember there were 2 strong diffs. One of them was
> something like "can i help you, andrei".
>
> Finally, a question: how many of you have emailed Thatcher now? I would
> like to in order to make a small comment, but I would rather do it later if
> more of you are already emailing him now.
>
> Dorin
>
> 2009/7/4 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
>
>> I've made the appeal at: [
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Appeal_against_discretionary_sanctions_by_Radeksz
>> ]
>> I was going to send it to the list but then my gmail went on the fritz and
>> further waiting would be just to frustrating for me so I went ahead and
>> filed it.
>> Durova, Jehoman and Loosemark have already commented. It'd probably be a
>> good idea to wait before commenting and not everyone all at once - let's see
>> how this develops first. Hopefully a few more admins that Piotrus contacted
>> earlier will chime in first - and any unneccesarry drama might scare them
>> off.
>>
>> Radek
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0016e642dd64c9e9e6046dd5aaa5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Offliner already showed up and I made a short reply but will probably leave=
 it at that. I&#39;ve emailed Thatcher quite a number of times since the re=
striction so it probably is a good idea to hold off. Wait until he comments=
 first.<br>
<br><br>Radek<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/3 Dorin Cheptea =
<span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:dorin.cheptea@gmail.com">dorin.chep=
tea@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; paddi=
ng-left: 1ex;">
voluntarily 1rr was a very good thing you did. i&#39;d abstain from comment=
ing, so that not to invite somebody from the cartel. the comments so far se=
em favorable to you. good luck.=A0<div><br></div><div>IMHO, Colchicum and M=
artintg should do the same.=A0</div>

<div><br></div><div>Can anyone provide me again with the diffs of stalking =
biophys (revealing his real identity). I remember there were 2 strong diffs=
. One of them was something like &quot;can i help you, andrei&quot;.=A0</di=
v>

<div><br></div><div>Finally, a question: how many of you have emailed Thatc=
her now? I would like to in order to make a small comment, but I would rath=
er do it later if more of you are already emailing him now.</div><div>
<br>
</div><div>Dorin<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/4 radek szulga <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank"=
>rsszulga@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;=
 padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">
I&#39;ve made the appeal at: [<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip=
edia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Appeal_against_discretionary_sanction=
s_by_Radeksz" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbi=
tration/Requests/Enforcement#Appeal_against_discretionary_sanctions_by_Rade=
ksz</a>]<br>


I was going to send it to the list but then my gmail went on the fritz and =
further waiting would be just to frustrating for me so I went ahead and fil=
ed it.<br>Durova, Jehoman and Loosemark have already commented. It&#39;d pr=
obably be a good idea to wait before commenting and not everyone all at onc=
e - let&#39;s see how this develops first. Hopefully a few more admins that=
 Piotrus contacted earlier will chime in first - and any unneccesarry drama=
 might scare them off.<br>

<font color=3D"#888888">
<br>Radek<br><br>
</font><br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net" target=3D"_blank">folks@wikipedo=
meter.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e642dd64c9e9e6046dd5aaa5--


--===============4553191943712883074==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4553191943712883074==--


