X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue May 12 02:07:26 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0905111506v5c0827e9k61f8ec6b50ebb356@mail.gmail.com>
References: <831427.31097.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0905110843sfbe50d7ge4ac3a4a0773ceef@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70905110904j61250d9dw5226e8cd13b26359@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0905111220j33863f3bm6da515ae5ba8dc28@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70905111336v564cb7e0ie8d5335726be6619@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0905111506v5c0827e9k61f8ec6b50ebb356@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:06:58 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880905111706s66146d69kef0329e853f6545e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Perhaps we should keep a watch on these identities,
	gather more evidence, then submit an SPI report via a friendly clerk if
	needed sometime in the future. Martin On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:06 AM, 
	Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > Back to
	UsernamePassword... He is obviously not a newby, but I do not know >
	whose > sock he really is. He came from a geographical location
	different from both > Anonimu > (although he and his IP edited
	Voronin!)
	and Jacob Peters. Many left-wingers > know writings by Lenin; so this is
	not a proof of anything. > > I can submit an SPI report, but only if
	there is some real proof (almost > identical phrases/expressions with
	Peters or whatever). I do not want to > investigate him myself, since he
	is not a significant problem, at least for > me. > > > > On Mon, May 11,
	2009 at 4:36 PM, Miacek and his crime-fighting dog >
	<miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> A cunning fox he was ; -) >> >> I
	just checked this >> >>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1993_Russian_constitutional_crisis&oldid=4543500,
	>> yes, it's extremely anti-Yeltsin POVed. >> >> He seemed to be an open
	'anti-neoliberal' >>
	(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:172&oldid=3271525), >>
	but as for communist affiliations, I'm not sure. >> >> M. >> >> On
	11/05/2009, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: >> > No, 172
	was an extremely biased Communist editor. He edited Robert >> > Mugabe
	>> > precisely like Jacob Peters >> > >> > >> >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Mugabe&diff=prev&oldid=637588
	>> > >> > and he tried to unilaterally delete the entire article about
	>> > Decommunisation >> > >> > >> >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decommunization_in_Russia&diff=183125655&oldid=182945938
	>> > >> > Also see his edits here >> > >> > >> >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Stalin&diff=prev&oldid=546036
	>> > >> > He inserts: "..credited the Stalin regime with abandoning the
	tsarist >> > policy >> > of persecuting national minorities in favor of
	a policy of tolerance..." >> > without any refs (and we know what >> >
	Stalin actually did with minorities) >> > >> > And so on, and so on.
	Yes, he pretend to be a neutral [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Anonimu returned?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Perhaps we should keep a watch on these identities,
	gather more evidence, then submit an SPI report via a friendly clerk if
	needed sometime in the future. Martin On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:06 AM,
	Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > Back to
	UsernamePassword... He is obviously not a newby, but I do not know >
	whose > sock he really is. He came from a geographical location
	different from both > Anonimu > (although he and his IP edited Voronin!)
	and Jacob Peters. Many left-wingers > know writings by Lenin; so this is
	not a proof of anything. > > I can submit an SPI report, but only if
	there is some real proof (almost > identical phrases/expressions with
	Peters or whatever). I do not want to > investigate him myself, since he
	is not a significant problem, at least for > me. > > > > On Mon, May 11,
	2009 at 4:36 PM, Miacek and his crime-fighting dog >
	<miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> A cunning fox he was ;-) >> >> I
	just checked this >> >>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1993_Russian_constitutional_crisis&oldid=4543500,
	>> yes, it's extremely anti-Yeltsin POVed. >> >> He seemed to be an open
	'anti-neoliberal' >>
	(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:172&oldid=3271525), >>
	but as for communist affiliations, I'm not sure. >> >> M. >> >> On
	11/05/2009, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: >> > No, 172
	was an extremely biased Communist editor. He edited Robert >> > Mugabe
	>> > precisely like Jacob Peters >> > >> > >> >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Mugabe&diff=prev&oldid=637588
	>> > >> > and he tried to unilaterally delete the entire article about
	>> > Decommunisation >> > >> > >> >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decommunization_in_Russia&diff=183125655&oldid=182945938
	>> > >> > Also see his edits here >> > >> > >> >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Stalin&diff=prev&oldid=546036
	>> > >> > He inserts: "..credited the Stalin regime with abandoning the
	tsarist >> > policy >> > of persecuting national minorities in favor of
	a policy of tolerance..." >> > without any refs (and we know what >> >
	Stalin actually did with minorities) >> > >> > And so on, and so on.
	Yes, he pretend to be a neutral [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Perhaps we should keep a watch on these identities, gather more
evidence, then submit an SPI report via a friendly clerk if needed
sometime in the future.

Martin

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:
> Back to UsernamePassword... He is obviously not a newby, but I do not know
> whose
> sock he really is. He came from a geographical location different from both
> Anonimu
> (although he and his IP edited Voronin!) and Jacob Peters. Many left-wingers
> know writings by Lenin; so  this is not a proof of anything.
>
> I can submit an SPI report, but only if there is some real proof (almost
> identical phrases/expressions with Peters or whatever). I do not want to
> investigate him myself, since he is not a significant problem, at least for
> me.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Miacek and his crime-fighting dog
> <miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> A cunning fox he was ;-)
>>
>> I just checked this
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1993_Russian_constitutional_crisis&oldid=4543500,
>> yes, it's extremely anti-Yeltsin POVed.
>>
>> He seemed to be an open 'anti-neoliberal'
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:172&oldid=3271525),
>> but as for communist affiliations, I'm not sure.
>>
>> M.
>>
>> On 11/05/2009, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > No, 172 was an extremely biased Communist editor. He edited Robert
>> > Mugabe
>> > precisely like Jacob Peters
>> >
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Mugabe&diff=prev&oldid=637588
>> >
>> > and he tried to unilaterally delete the entire article about
>> > Decommunisation
>> >
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decommunization_in_Russia&diff=183125655&oldid=182945938
>> >
>> > Also see his edits here
>> >
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Stalin&diff=prev&oldid=546036
>> >
>> > He inserts: "..credited the Stalin regime with abandoning the tsarist
>> > policy
>> > of persecuting national minorities in favor of a policy of tolerance..."
>> > without any refs (and we know what
>> > Stalin actually did with minorities)
>> >
>> > And so on, and so on. Yes, he pretend to be a neutral editor at several
>> > occasions and even fooled Ultramarine around.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <
>> > miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> 172 is a different matter, he's clearly no communist he's a
>> >> professional historian and seems to have retired from wiki by now
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Constanz&diff=52096717&oldid=52096687
>> >>
>> >> M.
>> >>
>> >> On 11/05/2009, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 18:33, Christian Suciu
>> >> > <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> 95% of Anonimu's edits concerned Romania. So unless he's
>> >> >> significantly
>> >> >> expanded his interests, it's likely not him.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Would you consider it plausible that UsernamePassword might be what
>> >> Anonimu
>> >> > would be if he moved to USA to study at some East Coast university?
>> >> >
>> >> > If not, we'll have to concentrate on the remaining possibilities.
>> >> >  Jacob
>> >> > Peters looks most promising, and Moreschi has considerable experience
>> >> with
>> >> > him.
>> >> >
>> >> > Incidentally, Hans Adler's interest in this matter is curious.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Andres Soolo
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> >> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> >> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

