X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 14 16:46:40 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906140742h200f1a2bk7d266ba2df278d5d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <960568.11005.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<4f045a880906140403s72981b45rf4637171b9a02615@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906140435m2d05aaeaie9e2b51a864130a0@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906140444n44fcff93n30f04a77ea3955cc@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906140700g752710adke6a57dbf9250c8f7@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906140742h200f1a2bk7d266ba2df278d5d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:46:24 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70906140746m3c83639cne6caa4f1e48a4e52@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  If 172 were puppet master ''Jacob Peters'',
	how come all
	those checkusers failed to reveal him? Would a shameless stalinist
	troll
	with not much of iontellect successfully play the role of some scholar
	for a long time? No, my two cents, but you may want to try a specific
	CU, of course. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Mikkalai
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  If 172 were puppet master ''Jacob Peters'', how come all
	those checkusers failed to reveal him? Would a shameless stalinist troll
	with not much of iontellect successfully play the role of some scholar
	for a long time? No, my two cents, but you may want to try a specific
	CU, of course. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

If 172 were puppet master  ''Jacob Peters'', how come all those
checkusers failed to reveal him? Would a shameless stalinist troll
with not much of iontellect successfully play the role of some scholar
for a long time? No, my two cents, but you may want to try a specific
CU, of course.

M.

On 14/06/2009, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 17:00, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "This guy is anti-Soviet". That is what he tells:
>>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Punitive_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union&diff=130942673&oldid=130942252
>
>
> One of the peculiarities of the Soviet system was that *everybody* lied.
>  Accordingly, scientists were not to be trusted, but sometimes, urban
> legends had a kernel of truth.  It could be that he believes in this one,
> for some reason.  I've seen intelligent ex-Soviet people believe in other
> weird stuff from experimentally refuted ideas about psychotronics up to
> unverifiable conspiracy theories, based on little more than 1. "everybody"
> talked about it, and 2. Soviet authorities denied it.  Accordingly, holding
> such a belief is a very weak indicator of political allegiance.
>
> Actually, this guy is main censor of articles on the Soviet Union, but he
>> usually plays by the rules to survive. He knows that mistakes can be
>> fatal,
>> especially after the recent ArbCom case when he was almost desysoped.
>
>
> He's complicated.
>
> One of the interesting differences between Mikkalai and the Cartel is that
> while Mikkalai doesn't do much on Wikipedia these days, he's good at what
> the does, and the Cartel tends to do amateurish mistakes.  If one were to
> put together a case that Mikkalai is a likely former or current spy, this
> would probably be a strong factor.
>
> As about User:172, his most recent edit is really telling:
>>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decommunization_in_Russia&diff=295113031&oldid=291631836
>>
>>  That is something expected from Jacob Peters.
>
>
> If there's a reasonable chance the checkusers can confirm this, we should
> sic them to it.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

