X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Aug 13 06:47:31 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880908122142nc29c0e8rdab4757897a267bc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4f045a880908122142nc29c0e8rdab4757897a267bc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:47:13 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880908122147s4da3e90fh763550ff75c7ece6@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  ps, check out the evidence of Ikip
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip
	On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Martin<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: >
	Check out
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Workshop#William_M._Connolley_is_desysoped
	> several ArbCom members are backing desysoping William. > > It may be
	worthwhile contributing, I don't think he is sympathetic to > our
	efforts, seeming to favour team Offliner, and recall his efforts > in
	removing content from [[Nuclear Winter]] then ignoring any > discussion
	on talk. > > I also recall he made some pretty bad blocks on some of us,
	for > example blocking me for edit warring 24 hours after my last edit
	which > was to undo myself. He also claimed one of my edits was a
	revert, see >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:William_M._Connolley#Question_about_Martintg_edit_warring.
	> Just yesterday he blocked a couple of people for no real reason other
	> than they were discussing something on his talk page, he later reduced
	> the block to one hour. But I also recall he made some serious
	mistakes
	> like blocking the wrong people, or so he claimed, several times. >
	Anyone else recall such things, I will compile it and add it to the >
	case. > > -- > Regards, > Martin > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] William M. Connolley RFAR
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  ps, check out the evidence of Ikip
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip
	On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Martin<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: >
	Check out
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Workshop#William_M._Connolley_is_desysoped
	> several ArbCom members are backing desysoping William. > > It may be
	worthwhile contributing, I don't think he is sympathetic to > our
	efforts, seeming to favour team Offliner, and recall his efforts > in
	removing content from [[Nuclear Winter]] then ignoring any > discussion
	on talk. > > I also recall he made some pretty bad blocks on some of us,
	for > example blocking me for edit warring 24 hours after my last edit
	which > was to undo myself. He also claimed one of my edits was a
	revert, see >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:William_M._Connolley#Question_about_Martintg_edit_warring.
	> Just yesterday he blocked a couple of people for no real reason other
	> than they were discussing something on his talk page, he later reduced
	> the block to one hour. But I also recall he made some serious mistakes
	> like blocking the wrong people, or so he claimed, several times. >
	Anyone else recall such things, I will compile it and add it to the >
	case. > > -- > Regards, > Martin > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

ps,

check out the evidence of Ikip
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip


On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Martin<martint20@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Workshop#William_M._Connolley_is_desysoped
> several ArbCom members are backing desysoping William.
>
> It may be worthwhile contributing, I don't think he is sympathetic to
> our efforts, seeming to favour team Offliner, and recall his efforts
> in removing content from [[Nuclear Winter]] then ignoring any
> discussion on talk.
>
> I also recall he made some pretty bad blocks on some of us, for
> example blocking me for edit warring 24 hours after my last edit which
> was to undo myself. He also claimed one of my edits was a revert, see
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:William_M._Connolley#Question_about_Martintg_edit_warring.
> Just yesterday he blocked a couple of people for no real reason other
> than they were discussing something on his talk page, he later reduced
> the block to one hour. But I also recall he made some serious mistakes
> like blocking the wrong people, or so he claimed, several times.
> Anyone else recall such things, I will compile it and add it to the
> case.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Martin
>



-- 
Regards,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

