X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Sep  3 01:09:55 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0909021332o382386c5s38deb2aae6d472b1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c9b.354f1120.37cf1136@aol.com>
	<4f045a880909011810j4296b85fk1dec7f63c4cf4209@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0909021153h218a3578p98be6cba924058fc@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0909021217x54f40d36s2c1e967fef286f87@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0909021329n6ac0a356kdff47a9802585f84@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0909021332o382386c5s38deb2aae6d472b1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:09:53 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880909021609l137dd979ne704ee3e958ff9fe@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I hope someone has written to Euronews and pointed out
	their error, pointing to the relevant Wikipedia page. On Thu, Sep 3,
	2009 at 6:32 AM, Molobo Molobo<molobus@gmail.com> wrote: > Then again
	you are talking about Euronews...In the coverage about WWII they >
	stated that Poland attacked tanks with cavalry.... > > 2009/9/2 Dorin
	Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com> >> >> We need to make the facts known
	better so in a couple years there would be >> more than half
	acknowledging USSR's role in starting WWII. >> We don't have to aim for
	80% or 90%. 51% is enough. Because these 51% >> would be well-informed, 
	while most of the remaining 49% would be ignorant >> about the facts.
	From 51% to 90% it will go by itself in a natural way. We >> can do or
	undo nothing at that point. Our focus should be 51%. >> >> Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> > > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] URGENT - needs only 1 click from you
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I hope someone has written to Euronews and pointed out
	their error, pointing to the relevant Wikipedia page. On Thu, Sep 3,
	2009 at 6:32 AM, Molobo Molobo<molobus@gmail.com> wrote: > Then again
	you are talking about Euronews...In the coverage about WWII they >
	stated that Poland attacked tanks with cavalry.... > > 2009/9/2 Dorin
	Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com> >> >> We need to make the facts known
	better so in a couple years there would be >> more than half
	acknowledging USSR's role in starting WWII. >> We don't have to aim for
	80% or 90%. 51% is enough. Because these 51% >> would be well-informed,
	while most of the remaining 49% would be ignorant >> about the facts.
	From 51% to 90% it will go by itself in a natural way. We >> can do or
	undo nothing at that point. Our focus should be 51%. >> >> Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> > > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I hope someone has written to Euronews and pointed out their error,
pointing to the relevant Wikipedia page.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Molobo Molobo<molobus@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then again you are talking about Euronews...In the coverage about WWII they
> stated that Poland attacked tanks with cavalry....
>
> 2009/9/2 Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
>>
>> We need to make the facts known better so in a couple years there would be
>> more than half acknowledging USSR's role in starting WWII.
>> We don't have to aim for 80% or 90%. 51% is enough. Because these 51%
>> would be well-informed, while most of the remaining 49% would be ignorant
>> about the facts. From 51% to 90% it will go by itself in a natural way. We
>> can do or undo nothing at that point. Our focus should be 51%.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

