X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jul  5 12:14:33 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A4FBA38.10401@post.pl>
References: <4A4FBA38.10401@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:14:17 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0907050314k38f13ffax5b4bac7b4b1492f1@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 23:23, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > * acknowledge that reverting is your biggest
	problem and promise to > adhere to 1RR for a year if unbanned Bad idea.
	Go for Thatcher's 6 months instead. That's adherence to precedent, and
	then they won't think you're doing oneupmanship. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appealing Molobo's block to ArbCom
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8981799139164463935=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 23:23, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > * acknowledge that reverting is your biggest
	problem and promise to > adhere to 1RR for a year if unbanned Bad idea.
	Go for Thatcher's 6 months instead. That's adherence to precedent, and
	then they won't think you're doing oneupmanship. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8981799139164463935==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d64163f274c6046df2a635

--0016e6d64163f274c6046df2a635
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 23:23, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> * acknowledge that reverting is your biggest problem and promise to
> adhere to 1RR for a year if unbanned


Bad idea.  Go for Thatcher's 6 months instead.  That's adherence to
precedent, and then they won't think you're doing oneupmanship.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6d64163f274c6046df2a635
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 23:23, Piotr Konieczny <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
* acknowledge that reverting is your biggest problem and promise to<br>
adhere to 1RR for a year if unbanned</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Bad id=
ea. =C2=A0Go for Thatcher&#39;s 6 months instead. =C2=A0That&#39;s adherenc=
e to precedent, and then they won&#39;t think you&#39;re doing oneupmanship=
.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e6d64163f274c6046df2a635--


--===============8981799139164463935==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8981799139164463935==--


