X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun May 31 15:39:27 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0905310325i57a1e783wdc1fa701e7a8ca56@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0905300613u1541c0dal63d2972e3f8a5731@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A219B5D.7000103@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0905310325i57a1e783wdc1fa701e7a8ca56@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 15:39:16 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0905310639p71a93017nfb1b57a90ef92ae9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Perhaps I would write the complaint and somebody else
	would post it ? It would look better I believe. 2009/5/31 Molobo Molobo
	<molobus@gmail.com> > I am not good at this kind of procedural writing, 
	thanks for all the > support guys. The RFC won't be available for some
	time, real life matters I > have to attend to do limit my time I can
	spend writing wikipedia. At best I > would be able to post it next
	weekend. > > Regards > > 2009/5/30 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> > >
	Digwuren wrote: >> > Avraham has reclassified Molobo's checkuser from
	"Unlikely" to >> > "Possible". Other than that, the discussion appears
	to have wound down. >> > >> > Considering that it's May 30th and Molobo
	hasn't been banned, is he >> > safe? Or are any actions needed to reduce
	his risk? >> >> There are delays, but the "ban Molobo" faction is still
	doing well. I >> think our best option is to keep insisting that
	evidence should be made >> public, or at least, available to all admins,
	since Deacon has it - and >> as a side benefit, keep demanding the
	answer to why Deacon got it. >> >> Further, I'd like to ask Molobo on
	the status of his RfC against >> Skapperod; as I said earlier, the
	sooner it is started, the better. >> >> >> -- >> Prokonsul Piotrus aka
	Piotr Konieczny |||____ __ __ >> I=I====__|_|I__I=> >> "Lennier, get us
	the hell out of here." ||| >> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of
	here'
	maneuver." >> -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the
	Wolf" >> >> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion list >>
	folks@wikipedometer.net
	>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> > > [...]
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Molobo
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4036853842291433995=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Perhaps I would write the complaint and somebody else
	would post it ? It would look better I believe. 2009/5/31 Molobo Molobo
	<molobus@gmail.com> > I am not good at this kind of procedural writing,
	thanks for all the > support guys. The RFC won't be available for some
	time, real life matters I > have to attend to do limit my time I can
	spend writing wikipedia. At best I > would be able to post it next
	weekend. > > Regards > > 2009/5/30 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> > >
	Digwuren wrote: >> > Avraham has reclassified Molobo's checkuser from
	"Unlikely" to >> > "Possible". Other than that, the discussion appears
	to have wound down. >> > >> > Considering that it's May 30th and Molobo
	hasn't been banned, is he >> > safe? Or are any actions needed to reduce
	his risk? >> >> There are delays, but the "ban Molobo" faction is still
	doing well. I >> think our best option is to keep insisting that
	evidence should be made >> public, or at least, available to all admins,
	since Deacon has it - and >> as a side benefit, keep demanding the
	answer to why Deacon got it. >> >> Further, I'd like to ask Molobo on
	the status of his RfC against >> Skapperod; as I said earlier, the
	sooner it is started, the better. >> >> >> -- >> Prokonsul Piotrus aka
	Piotr Konieczny |||____ __ __ >> I=I====__|_|I__I=> >> "Lennier, get us
	the hell out of here." ||| >> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here'
	maneuver." >> -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
	>> >> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion list >> folks@wikipedometer.net
	>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4036853842291433995==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd329ca9371e5046b356f41

--000e0cd329ca9371e5046b356f41
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Perhaps I would write the complaint and somebody else would post it ? It
would look better I believe.

2009/5/31 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>

> I am not good at this kind of procedural writing, thanks for all the
> support guys. The RFC won't be available for some time, real life matters I
> have to attend to do limit my time I can spend writing wikipedia. At  best I
> would be able to post it next weekend.
>
> Regards
>
> 2009/5/30 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
>
> Digwuren wrote:
>> > Avraham has reclassified Molobo's checkuser from "Unlikely" to
>> > "Possible".  Other than that, the discussion appears to have wound down.
>> >
>> > Considering that it's May 30th and Molobo hasn't been banned, is he
>> > safe?  Or are any actions needed to reduce his risk?
>>
>> There are delays, but the "ban Molobo" faction is still doing well. I
>> think our best option is to keep insisting that evidence should be made
>> public, or at least, available to all admins, since Deacon has it - and
>> as a side benefit, keep demanding the answer to why Deacon got it.
>>
>> Further, I'd like to ask Molobo on the status of his RfC against
>> Skapperod; as I said earlier, the sooner it is started, the better.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
>>                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
>> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
>> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
>>  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>
>

--000e0cd329ca9371e5046b356f41
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Perhaps I would write the complaint and somebody else would post it ? It wo=
uld look better I believe.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/5/31 Molo=
bo Molobo <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:molobus@gmail.com">molobu=
s@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, =
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I am not good at =
this kind of procedural writing, thanks for all the support guys. The RFC w=
on&#39;t be available for some time, real life matters I have to attend to =
do limit my time I can spend writing wikipedia. At=A0 best I would be able =
to post it next weekend.<br>

<br>Regards<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/5/30 Piotr Konieczny <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span><div><div></div><div class=3D"h=
5"><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rg=
b(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

<div><div></div><div>Digwuren wrote:<br>
&gt; Avraham has reclassified Molobo&#39;s checkuser from &quot;Unlikely&qu=
ot; to<br>
&gt; &quot;Possible&quot;. =A0Other than that, the discussion appears to ha=
ve wound down.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Considering that it&#39;s May 30th and Molobo hasn&#39;t been banned, =
is he<br>
&gt; safe? =A0Or are any actions needed to reduce his risk? <br>
<br>
</div></div>There are delays, but the &quot;ban Molobo&quot; faction is sti=
ll doing well. I<br>
think our best option is to keep insisting that evidence should be made<br>
public, or at least, available to all admins, since Deacon has it - and<br>
as a side benefit, keep demanding the answer to why Deacon got it.<br>
<br>
Further, I&#39;d like to ask Molobo on the status of his RfC against<br>
Skapperod; as I said earlier, the sooner it is started, the better.<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __<br>
 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D&gt;<br>
&quot;Lennier, get us the hell out of here.&quot; =A0 =A0 |||<br>
&quot;Initiating &#39;getting the hell out of here&#39; maneuver.&quot;<br>
 =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:&quot;The Hour of the Wolf&quot;<br=
>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net" target=3D"_blank">folks@wikipedo=
meter.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br>

--000e0cd329ca9371e5046b356f41--


--===============4036853842291433995==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4036853842291433995==--


