X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 15 22:20:26 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906151131i667949d4i2407c5d86d2847c9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4f045a880906142307i47f6858fidea92c4c4e9233d7@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3684F7.5060405@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906151131i667949d4i2407c5d86d2847c9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:20:08 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70906151320h2d3eb225p6e9bb513d49682ce@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Just consider how long it took, since User:Miacek was
	invited to the list here: if we are careful - as we should be - , the
	others are presumably too :) It won't be an easy job. M. On 15/06/2009, 
	Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 20:29,
	Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: > >> But this may take months
	(consider how long it takes for us to invite >> somebody here). > > >
	It
	depends, probably mostly on how organised the Cartel is. According to >
	what I have read about the Web Brigades, if Cartel really is aligned
	with > one, infiltration is likely to be a slow process. But if it
	consists just > of the visible members, perhaps with a single "older and
	wiser comrade" from > a three-letter agency watching from background,
	available to occasionally > help the main players, it can be much
	faster. > > Identity politics works much faster than rational analysis.
	If Cartel > membership hangs on *being* Russian and supporting Putin,
	it's easy. If > they'll go through the behaviour checks, it's not. > >
	-- > Andres Soolo > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Infiltration into the Cabal
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Just consider how long it took, since User:Miacek was
	invited to the list here: if we are careful - as we should be - , the
	others are presumably too :) It won't be an easy job. M. On 15/06/2009,
	Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 20:29,
	Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: > >> But this may take months
	(consider how long it takes for us to invite >> somebody here). > > > It
	depends, probably mostly on how organised the Cartel is. According to >
	what I have read about the Web Brigades, if Cartel really is aligned
	with > one, infiltration is likely to be a slow process. But if it
	consists just > of the visible members, perhaps with a single "older and
	wiser comrade" from > a three-letter agency watching from background,
	available to occasionally > help the main players, it can be much
	faster. > > Identity politics works much faster than rational analysis.
	If Cartel > membership hangs on *being* Russian and supporting Putin,
	it's easy. If > they'll go through the behaviour checks, it's not. > >
	-- > Andres Soolo > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Just consider how long it took, since User:Miacek was invited to the
list here: if we are careful - as we should be - , the others are
presumably too :)
It won't be an easy job.

M.

On 15/06/2009, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 20:29, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>
>> But this may take months (consider how long it takes for us to invite
>> somebody here).
>
>
> It depends, probably mostly on how organised the Cartel is.  According to
> what I have read about the Web Brigades, if Cartel really is aligned with
> one, infiltration is likely to be a slow process.  But if it consists just
> of the visible members, perhaps with a single "older and wiser comrade" from
> a three-letter agency watching from background, available to occasionally
> help the main players, it can be much faster.
>
> Identity politics works much faster than rational analysis.  If Cartel
> membership hangs on *being* Russian and supporting Putin, it's easy.  If
> they'll go through the behaviour checks, it's not.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

