X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun  7 15:11:24 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906070608r67e7b4c4m90da803b0307bbac@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0906070608r67e7b4c4m90da803b0307bbac@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 23:11:12 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880906070611t5396cdfbyeb5e9eed68408f42@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I heartily agree,
	as I can personally attest. Sander was
	lucky to escape, a more hostile admin may not have hesitated. On Sun,
	Jun 7, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Digwuren<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: >
	PasswordUssername has earned his first block. It's a 3RR block after he
	> filed a false 3RR report on Sander. > > It demonstrates the dangers
	inherent in 3RR reports. The maximum reasonably > safe number of
	reverts
	per day on any article is two; when you need more, > call somebody else
	to help. > > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion
	list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Happy happy, joy joy.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I heartily agree, as I can personally attest. Sander was
	lucky to escape, a more hostile admin may not have hesitated. On Sun,
	Jun 7, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Digwuren<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: >
	PasswordUssername has earned his first block. It's a 3RR block after he
	> filed a false 3RR report on Sander. > > It demonstrates the dangers
	inherent in 3RR reports. The maximum reasonably > safe number of reverts
	per day on any article is two; when you need more, > call somebody else
	to help. > > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion
	list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I heartily agree, as I can personally attest. Sander was lucky to
escape, a more hostile admin may not have hesitated.

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Digwuren<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> PasswordUssername has earned his first block.=A0 It's a 3RR block after he
> filed a false 3RR report on Sander.
>
> It demonstrates the dangers inherent in 3RR reports.=A0 The maximum reaso=
nably
> safe number of reverts per day on any article is two; when you need more,
> call somebody else to help.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

