X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  8 17:42:11 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906080827u3a47232bjaf659fb799294ca2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0906060616s7dd20794o40b98d98be6687c8@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906070203x197fee29neb795943eb3f6202@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2C1D70.6050507@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0906071531n102e5748u8142b4308b2535ef@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906071619p4a65b22hdefac48108ef0a84@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906071711s582ed998kd1d2a6b2ae04c432@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906072316l54bd7f3cr8db9d08928734a3a@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2CD905.8030904@post.pl> <4A2CE548.60607@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906080827u3a47232bjaf659fb799294ca2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:41:53 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906080841s6141950en75e4ac0c10fccfea@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Found another one, filed. (I apologize to non-Polish
	folks for posting so much on Poland specific goings on - a few things
	just came up at once) Radek [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Skapperod on the roll
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Found another one, filed. (I apologize to non-Polish
	folks for posting so much on Poland specific goings on - a few things
	just came up at once) Radek [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Found another one, filed.

(I apologize to non-Polish folks for posting so much on Poland
specific goings on - a few things just came up at once)

Radek


2009/6/8 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>:
> The 2nd and 3rd one are the same.
>
> 2009/6/8 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
>> Piotr Konieczny wrote:
>>> radek szulga wrote:
>>>> And I think Skap just reverted again after Tymek which would make it 4
>>>> - though it's hard to tell because of his editing style.
>>>
>>> I think he did; I don't have time right now to analyze this but if
>>> somebody could do so it would be great. Remember: all it takes is to
>>> show that he removed/restored something that was removed/restored by
>>> others in a single article 4 times within 24h; those 4 edits don't need
>>> to be the same.
>>
>> Here are 4 reverts - I don't have time to file a report myself; it
>> should be noted that more reverts can be found in his recent edits on
>> this page, although they fall in longer strings of edits mixed with
>> non-reverts. Those four, however, are pretty clear:
>> *
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D295052=
744&oldid=3D295039187
>> *
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D295058=
475&oldid=3D295057425
>> *
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D295058=
475&oldid=3D295057425
>> *
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D295142=
920&oldid=3D295141645
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
>> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here." =A0 =A0 |||
>> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
>> =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

