X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 29 09:52:36 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880906281705k5d7967aaqbe2ad28ed8d8ee96@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A480401.9060205@post.pl>
	<4f045a880906281705k5d7967aaqbe2ad28ed8d8ee96@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:52:18 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906290052q39227fcfx1ed191605eea8367@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:05, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > The danger is that if we do make
	comments, Offliner, Deacon and others > will pile on in support of
	Viriditas. What if one of us would positively comment on "Viriditas'
	content contribution"? If it's suitably vague, it's unlikely to directly
	change the outcome of the battle. Others could join in on criticising
	his wikihounding after Offliner & co arrive. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Mosedschurte
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6821831312412948113=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:05, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > The danger is that if we do make
	comments, Offliner, Deacon and others > will pile on in support of
	Viriditas. What if one of us would positively comment on "Viriditas'
	content contribution"? If it's suitably vague, it's unlikely to directly
	change the outcome of the battle. Others could join in on criticising
	his wikihounding after Offliner & co arrive. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6821831312412948113==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5ad4d1f85d7046d77f867

--001636c5ad4d1f85d7046d77f867
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:05, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:

> The danger is that if we do make comments, Offliner, Deacon and others
> will pile on in support of Viriditas.


What if one of us would positively comment on "Viriditas' content
contribution"?  If it's suitably vague, it's unlikely to directly change the
outcome of the battle.  Others could join in on criticising his wikihounding
after Offliner & co arrive.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5ad4d1f85d7046d77f867
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:05, Martin <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:martint20@gmail.com">martint20@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
The danger is that if we do make comments, Offliner, Deacon and others<br>
will pile on in support of Viriditas.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>What =
if one of us would positively comment on &quot;Viriditas&#39; content contr=
ibution&quot;? =C2=A0If it&#39;s suitably vague, it&#39;s unlikely to direc=
tly change the outcome of the battle. =C2=A0Others could join in on critici=
sing his wikihounding after Offliner &amp; co arrive.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5ad4d1f85d7046d77f867--


--===============6821831312412948113==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6821831312412948113==--


