X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Apr 26 20:58:04 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <49F4AA8E.4050208@post.pl>
References: <623986.62457.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0904241316y2d5d13ffre68cc86bc629bb99@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0904241418w42df54e2j71e867d659fabbc9@mail.gmail.com>
	<49F4AA8E.4050208@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:57:45 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0904261157q3441d271r6104226f1e1e5b7@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 21:40, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > The discussion is not going very well, what is
	needed is a clear > demonstration that Russavia has edited for 20+h
	period often with almost > no breaks. This is not clear in the current
	discussion. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Evidence against Russavia
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4704636912529001845=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 21:40, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > The discussion is not going very well, what is
	needed is a clear > demonstration that Russavia has edited for 20+h
	period often with almost > no breaks. This is not clear in the current
	discussion. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0001]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4704636912529001845==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d59d1d205d35046879cebe

--0016e6d59d1d205d35046879cebe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 21:40, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> The discussion is not going very well, what is needed is a clear
> demonstration that Russavia has edited for 20+h period often with almost
> no breaks. This is not clear in the current discussion.


I'm still unclear about what can be done to keep the discussion on this
anomaly without allowing it to be derailed to "Biophys is making dramu
again".

The http://wikipedometer.net/finds/streaks-270-Russavia.txt interface is
>
not very friendly, I looked at the data on that page, but without clear
> definitions of "max interval", this is not very helpful.


Any suggestions?

"max interval" is, in one sense, the longest amount of time between
consecutive edits for them to be counted in a single streak, and in another,
the longest amount of time between consecutive edits inside a single streak.

One final thing to consider: why would Russian propaganda team use one
> account instead of several? I am sorry, but I can't think what would
> they gain by this (on the other hand, they are loosing for example
> opportunity to cast several votes).


Because they're poorly organised?  Or because they believe that, for
whatever reason, it's important to get all that stuff about Soviet heroes
and Russian aeronautics out?  Or because they believe in edit count as the
measure of an activist?

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6d59d1d205d35046879cebe
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 21:40, Piotr Konieczny <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">The discussion is not going very well, what is needed is =
a clear<br></div>
demonstration that Russavia has edited for 20+h period often with almost<br=
>
no breaks. This is not clear in the current discussion.</blockquote><div><b=
r></div><div>I&#39;m still unclear about what can be done to keep the discu=
ssion on this anomaly without allowing it to be derailed to &quot;Biophys i=
s making dramu again&quot;.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">The <a href=3D"http://wikipe=
dometer.net/finds/streaks-270-Russavia.txt" target=3D"_blank">http://wikipe=
dometer.net/finds/streaks-270-Russavia.txt</a> interface is<br>
</blockquote><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;b=
order-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
not very friendly, I looked at the data on that page, but without clear<br>
definitions of &quot;max interval&quot;, this is not very helpful.</blockqu=
ote><div><br></div><div>Any suggestions?</div><div><br></div><div>&quot;max=
 interval&quot; is, in one sense, the longest amount of time between consec=
utive edits for them to be counted in a single streak, and in another, the =
longest amount of time between consecutive edits inside a single streak.</d=
iv>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">One final thing to consider:=
 why would Russian propaganda team use one<br>
account instead of several? I am sorry, but I can&#39;t think what would<br=
>
they gain by this (on the other hand, they are loosing for example<br>
opportunity to cast several votes).</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Because=
 they&#39;re poorly organised? =C2=A0Or because they believe that, for what=
ever reason, it&#39;s important to get all that stuff about Soviet heroes a=
nd Russian aeronautics out? =C2=A0Or because they believe in edit count as =
the measure of an activist?</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e6d59d1d205d35046879cebe--


--===============4704636912529001845==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4704636912529001845==--


