X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Aug 18 16:35:03 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 580476.79365.bm@omp400.mail.sp1.yahoo.com
Message-ID: <453454.28333.qm@web45105.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: S0e7JlEVM1kaRePHb2or9SxNQGn3OHhFEqdGkyROvSQG5qlNRiiAEcfWW5jMAwKvQD3waybpJiQVkc9KQbjpyjKQAwFW5Q75hwnzXaePfeNES0alY2HEafwP6WRBLCx4siA5zFX1vg35DcXj6kPmLZYyLkSQUUj7f5T2yem3guidKD9HRS37.2fcCq8_Ez6H8SwHNDeJEYHVLjz66YckwoSSfGhruXNIRbAqgkVO4mpIgecBbpHtDlqHOlRnRAcgFyfNczHJVBuphxLSZaZ08eGO9qHtb1wD5nxyzA--
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/6.1.2 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0908180037v11926426o7f7ea6b383a1d0@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  O.K. thanks for the tip. --- On Mon, 8/17/09, radek
	szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: From: radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> Subject: [WPM] Mikej007 - to Jacurek To:
	"Wikipedia
	statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net> Date: Monday, August 17, 2009,
	11:37 PM [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.2 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20 BODY: HTML: images with 1600-2000 bytes of words
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,
	HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Mikej007 - to Jacurek
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5194085753977701058=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.4
X-Spam_score_int: 14
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  O.K. thanks for the tip. --- On Mon, 8/17/09, radek
	szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: From: radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> Subject: [WPM] Mikej007 - to Jacurek To: "Wikipedia
	statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net> Date: Monday, August 17, 2009,
	11:37 PM [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.2 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20     BODY: HTML: images with 1600-2000 bytes of words
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.7 BAYES_20               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20%
	[score: 0.1721]
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-1.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5194085753977701058==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-723948910-1250606095=:28333"

--0-723948910-1250606095=:28333
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

O.K.=A0thanks for the tip.

--- On Mon, 8/17/09, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
Subject: [WPM] Mikej007 - to Jacurek
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Monday, August 17, 2009, 11:37 PM

Hey Jacurek,
I noticed the exchange with Mikej007 on your talk page. I think you've answ=
ered him perfectly, but I think it should be just said that it's important =
to be careful. Some of his comments, like 'we should arrange a group to wat=
ch together' and 'and what do you mean not revert?' sound a bit suspicious =
to me - basically like this is some kind of agent provocateur talking tryin=
g to either find out if a group already exists or getting you to say someth=
ing that can be used against you later.
=0AKeep on being careful.

Radek
=0A
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
=0A=0A=0A      
--0-723948910-1250606095=:28333
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;">O.K.<img src=3D"http://mail.yimg.com/us.yimg.=
com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/01.gif">&nbsp;thanks for the tip.<br><br>--- On <b>Mon=
, 8/17/09, radek szulga <i>&lt;rsszulga@gmail.com&gt;</i></b> wrote:<br><bl=
ockquote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px=
; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: radek szulga &lt;rsszulga@gmail.com&gt;<br>=
Subject: [WPM] Mikej007 - to Jacurek<br>To: "Wikipedia statistics" &lt;folk=
s@wikipedometer.net&gt;<br>Date: Monday, August 17, 2009, 11:37 PM<br><br><=
div id=3D"yiv353425111">Hey Jacurek,<br>I noticed the exchange with Mikej00=
7 on your talk page. I think you've answered him perfectly, but I think it =
should be just said that it's important to be careful. Some of his comments=
, like 'we should arrange a group to watch together' and 'and what do you m=
ean not revert?' sound a bit suspicious to me - basically like this is some=
 kind of
 agent provocateur talking trying to either find out if a group already exi=
sts or getting you to say something that can be used against you later.<br>=
=0AKeep on being careful.<br><br>Radek<br>=0A</div><br>-----Inline Attachme=
nt Follows-----<br><br><div class=3D"plainMail">___________________________=
____________________<br>Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br><a ymailto=
=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net" href=3D"/mc/compose?to=3Dfolks@wikipedo=
meter.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br><a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.n=
et/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.n=
et/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></tab=
le><br>=0A=0A      
--0-723948910-1250606095=:28333--



--===============5194085753977701058==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5194085753977701058==--



