X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Sep  2 00:15:27 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0909011459m3704c87aq24588691a59bb903@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f826636f0909011445x11261d92p443fb166a8d9a23@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0909011459m3704c87aq24588691a59bb903@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 01:15:24 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0909011515g32060ba0p57ab3b1e5aa46f98@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: > > interested here more than in other issues. And
	this
	is precisely the answer >> to the question "what should we do if some
	disagreement arises between two >> persons here?" >> > > Ideally, make
	reasonable decisions through rational discussion. This > involves
	finding out what the facts are, what experts say about the facts, > what
	are the reasons for experts' opinions differing, and finally, >
	determining what is appropriate for Wikipedia and how it should be >
	presented. > > But I guess old habits die hard. > > -- > Andres Soolo >
	> Yes, certainly, please, first try to solve the matter by email between
	yourselves or in the view of the rest of the group. But if that does
	not
	satisfy one and one feels more attached for a period of time to some
	other issues to the level that one get disinterested in issues targeted
	by the pro-Soviet propaganda, then it is ok for one to retire for that
	period of time and come back later. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] URGENT - needs only 1 click from you
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7845489644966231550=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  > > interested here more than in other issues. And this
	is precisely the answer >> to the question "what should we do if some
	disagreement arises between two >> persons here?" >> > > Ideally, make
	reasonable decisions through rational discussion. This > involves
	finding out what the facts are, what experts say about the facts, > what
	are the reasons for experts' opinions differing, and finally, >
	determining what is appropriate for Wikipedia and how it should be >
	presented. > > But I guess old habits die hard. > > -- > Andres Soolo >
	> Yes, certainly, please, first try to solve the matter by email between
	yourselves or in the view of the rest of the group. But if that does not
	satisfy one and one feels more attached for a period of time to some
	other issues to the level that one get disinterested in issues targeted
	by the pro-Soviet propaganda, then it is ok for one to retire for that
	period of time and come back later. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7845489644966231550==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325558b4eb165fa04728b7c88

--000325558b4eb165fa04728b7c88
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>
> interested here more than in other issues. And this is precisely the answer
>> to the question "what should we do if some disagreement arises between two
>> persons here?"
>>
>
> Ideally, make reasonable decisions through rational discussion.  This
> involves finding out what the facts are, what experts say about the facts,
> what are the reasons for experts' opinions differing, and finally,
> determining what is appropriate for Wikipedia and how it should be
> presented.
>
> But I guess old habits die hard.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
>
Yes, certainly, please, first try to solve the matter by email between
yourselves or in the view of the rest of the group. But if that does not
satisfy one and one feels more attached for a period of time to some other
issues to the level that one get disinterested in issues targeted by the
pro-Soviet propaganda, then it is ok for one to retire for that period of
time and come back later.

I agree with Andres. Discussing the facts in the view of the rest of us can
indeed help because two sides have a priori equal chances to convincingly
inform some of us about issues which we know very little to nothing about.
(If Deacon or Irpen would try, it would be very hard for me to be unbiased
:). Honestly. )

--000325558b4eb165fa04728b7c88
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"m=
argin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>interested here mor=
e than in other issues. And this is precisely the answer to the question &q=
uot;what should we do if some disagreement arises between two persons here?=
&quot;</div>

</div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Ideally, make reasonable decis=
ions through rational discussion. =A0This involves finding out what the fac=
ts are, what experts say about the facts, what are the reasons for experts&=
#39; opinions differing, and finally, determining what is appropriate for W=
ikipedia and how it should be presented.</div>

<div><br></div><div>But I guess old habits die hard.</div><div><br></div></=
div><font color=3D"#888888">-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
</font><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, certainly, please, first t=
ry to solve the matter by email between yourselves or in the view of the re=
st of the group. But if that does not satisfy one and one feels more attach=
ed for a period of time to some other issues to the level that one get disi=
nterested in issues targeted by the pro-Soviet propaganda, then it is ok fo=
r one to retire for that period of time and come back later.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I agree with Andres.=A0Discussing the facts in the view=
 of the rest of us can indeed help because two sides have a priori equal ch=
ances to convincingly inform some of us about issues which we know very lit=
tle to nothing about. (If Deacon or Irpen would try, it would be very hard =
for me to be unbiased :). Honestly. )=A0</div>
</div>

--000325558b4eb165fa04728b7c88--


--===============7845489644966231550==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7845489644966231550==--


