X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri May  1 18:27:22 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0905010826x107a0abavce155ab6d4112fe5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d2a.4934ac18.372a3d71@aol.com>
	<4f045a880904292015ja4833ccgbf83b371316a008c@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0904292133mc31b72ale0872abae1a24cb6@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0904292153n16843e9dgbc4162a25e7c7e0c@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70904301111m1a57fb40t7b9d723aa86a1a0a@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880905010636p69bda9c6l3e273739b222a1c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880905010641x38e9bdfav2fe3abe2062b183b@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0905010822k1a8ff5e9xef6ca484e032d492@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0905010826x107a0abavce155ab6d4112fe5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 19:27:05 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70905010927v8f112bdh78179f65831d5ff8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  yes, at the same time Piotr and M.K. should be able to
	show at last, that they are able to cooperate. As for sysop H.'s clear
	violation of rule a thread on noticeboard somewhere might suffice at
	the
	moment, we don't need a two-month long arbitration case initiated again.
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Here we go again, Baltic mediation
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  yes, at the same time Piotr and M.K. should be able to
	show at last, that they are able to cooperate. As for sysop H.'s clear
	violation of rule a thread on noticeboard somewhere might suffice at the
	moment, we don't need a two-month long arbitration case initiated again.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

yes, at the same time Piotr and M.K. should be able to show at last,
that they are able to cooperate. As for sysop H.'s clear violation of
rule a thread on noticeboard somewhere might suffice at the moment, we
don't need a two-month long arbitration case initiated again.

M.

On 01/05/2009, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 18:22, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Interestingly, M.K. has shown up, and seems to be reasonably constructive
> for the time being.  If we can co=F6perate with him on this topic, maybe =
our
> relations will improve in the future.  I recommend that Piotrus approach
> this with caution -- there's a risk that mere involvement of Piotrus might
> throw M.K. off the rail, and that would not benefit anybody.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

