X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 21:00:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bec.3fb26d79.376fd25e@aol.com>
References: <bec.3fb26d79.376fd25e@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:00:28 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211200lc31ca2fo71656d6375b7fd5d@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Exactly. Let's keep quiet over there and even cordial.
	2009/6/21 <PetersJV@aol.com>: > In a message dated 6/21/2009 1:53:06
	P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > rsszulga@gmail.com writes: > > Basically I
	think it's a good > idea to minimize potential conflicts in the
	Polish-Jewish relations > area now, and without agent provocateurs like
	Boodles around this > isn't actually that hard and cooperation comes
	about naturally. It'd > be nice if and when Boodles comes back, he finds
	himself without the > support of other editors that he dragged along
	into all the battles > before - I don't think this is realistic with
	respect to Moordoor but > others, like Malik Shabazz, seem like
	reasonable fellows. > > Boodles can't restrain himself from finding
	foaming-at-the-mouth (put words > in their mouth if he has to)
	anti-Semites. If he returns to that subject > area, I suspect it won't
	be long until he blows up again. Lack of > controversy until then would
	be very helpful to offer as a contrast. > /Peters > > A Good Credit
	Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Aron Bielski/Christian Bale
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Exactly. Let's keep quiet over there and even cordial.
	2009/6/21 <PetersJV@aol.com>: > In a message dated 6/21/2009 1:53:06
	P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > rsszulga@gmail.com writes: > > Basically I
	think it's a good > idea to minimize potential conflicts in the
	Polish-Jewish relations > area now, and without agent provocateurs like
	Boodles around this > isn't actually that hard and cooperation comes
	about naturally. It'd > be nice if and when Boodles comes back, he finds
	himself without the > support of other editors that he dragged along
	into all the battles > before - I don't think this is realistic with
	respect to Moordoor but > others, like Malik Shabazz, seem like
	reasonable fellows. > > Boodles can't restrain himself from finding
	foaming-at-the-mouth (put words > in their mouth if he has to)
	anti-Semites. If he returns to that subject > area, I suspect it won't
	be long until he blows up again. Lack of > controversy until then would
	be very helpful to offer as a contrast. > /Peters > > A Good Credit
	Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Exactly. Let's keep quiet over there and even cordial.

2009/6/21  <PetersJV@aol.com>:
> In a message dated 6/21/2009 1:53:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> rsszulga@gmail.com writes:
>
> Basically I think it's a good
> idea to minimize potential conflicts in the Polish-Jewish relations
> area now, and without agent provocateurs like Boodles around this
> isn't actually that hard and cooperation comes about naturally. It'd
> be nice if and when Boodles comes back, he finds himself without the
> support of other editors that he dragged along into all the battles
> before - I don't think this is realistic with respect to Moordoor but
> others, like Malik Shabazz, seem like reasonable fellows.
>
> Boodles can't restrain himself from finding foaming-at-the-mouth (put words
> in their mouth if he has to) anti-Semites. If he returns to that subject
> area, I suspect it won't be long until he blows up again. Lack of
> controversy until then would be very helpful to offer as a contrast.
> /Peters
> ________________________________
> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

