X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Sep  8 20:18:51 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4AA6A018.7070802@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:19:04 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.17
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <184746.12419.qm@web45113.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <184746.12419.qm@web45113.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Jack wrote: >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Xx236
	> What is our position as far as backing him up? He was reported bu S.
	who > in the past got in trouble himself for filing ungrounded
	complaints. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Xx236 needs help.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Jack wrote: >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Xx236
	> What is our position as far as backing him up? He was reported bu S.
	who > in the past got in trouble himself for filing ungrounded
	complaints. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Jack wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Xx236
> What is our position as far as backing him up? He was reported bu S. who 
> in the past got in trouble himself for filing ungrounded complaints.

Never liked him...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xx236#Notice_of_editing_restrictions

Plus he so rarely edits articles, he is almost like a Polish Dr. Dan - 
all talk, little substance. That said, Dr. Dan is much more hate filled 
and so on... but to be honest, I don't feel the need to go out of my way 
to defend Xx, and a major factor is that I cannot recall a single 
helpful content creation he did (at best he makes some minor edits and 
complains a lot on talk).

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

