X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 12 06:41:46 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
From: PetersJV@aol.com
Message-ID: <bed.41534bc8.37633661@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:41:05 EDT
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5377
X-AOL-IP: 64.12.78.139
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Alas,
	I ignored my own Latvian "old saying" device about
	not stomping in s**t because it only spreads and stinks and wrote a
	short tome on Aaviksoo.... A momentary failing. I'll try not to do
	again
	and just deal with PasswordUsername as dispassionately as possible
	until
	he implodes. I need to decide whether or not to file arb. enforcement.
	I
	know what his responses are, the question is how airtight a case can be
	argued. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.0 NO_REAL_NAME           From: does not include a real name
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0001]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,HTML_30_40,
	HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] PasswordUsername, opportunity
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3732325252498244938=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Alas, I ignored my own Latvian "old saying" device about
	not stomping in s**t because it only spreads and stinks and wrote a
	short tome on Aaviksoo.... A momentary failing. I'll try not to do again
	and just deal with PasswordUsername as dispassionately as possible until
	he implodes. I need to decide whether or not to file arb. enforcement. I
	know what his responses are, the question is how airtight a case can be
	argued. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.0 NO_REAL_NAME           From: does not include a real name
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============3732325252498244938==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1244781665"


-------------------------------1244781665
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en

Alas, I ignored my own Latvian "old saying" device about not stomping in=
  
s**t because it only spreads and stinks and wrote a short tome on 
Aaviksoo.... A  momentary failing. I'll try not to do again and just deal=
  with 
PasswordUsername as dispassionately as possible until he  implodes. I need=
 to 
decide whether or not to file arb. enforcement. I know what  his responses=
 are, 
the question is how airtight a case can be argued.
 
IMHO, his agenda to attack out anti-Soviet / anti-Russian propaganda  
editors is becoming quite clear, along with promoting the Baltics as a hot=
bed of  
Nazism.
 
People always give up some information in their alter-egos. "Frank" from=
  
Wichita? My ass. I can easily see someone who is NOT open and honest (i.e.=
,  
frank), choosing that as their pen name for their nefarious purposes. If=
 I'm 
 sounding like Biophys, it's only because I've run into enough of these on=
 
WP to  develop radar. My Spidey sense is tingling.
 
ON ANOTHER TOPIC, we need some sort of dynamic/automated article dashboard=
. 
 For example...
 
(1)    list of ourselves and similar
(2)    list of opposition
Using, say, 3 edits (not minor) in 48 hours as a watermark (adjust  
empirically)
(3)    (a)    list article, GREEN,  increased activity by (1)
        (b)    AMBER,  increased activity by (1), one or more edits by (2)=
, 
# edits by (1) >> #  edits by (2)
        (c)    RED,  activity by (1) and (2), more than N edits in 48 hour=
s 
and/or # edits by (2)  > # edits by (1)
        (d)    RED,  any article prior on the RED list which has not been=
 
touched (stable) which is  edited out of the blue by (2)
        (e)    BLUE,  an article either GREEN, AMBER, or RED with no edits=
 
in the 48 hours (bots  excluded)
 
Dashboard would persist for 3 blue cycles, then article would age off the=
  
list. Dashboard would (therefore) display 4 x 48 hours cycles. This could=
 be 
 scaled to 24 from 48. We'd have to see what works. Of course, this can be=
 
tuned  up with historical data to see if problem articles immediately pop=
 up.
 
I need to do some more thinking on this. Clearly it is unproductive for =
 
each of us individually or a group to be checking up on edits by people on=
  
articles which might not be on our watchlist. Personally, I do have a 
reasonable  number of articles outside of our area of contention on my wat=
chlist, so 
I don't  always catch things right away.
 
/Peters
 
 
**************Shop Dell=E2=80=99s full line of Laptops now starting at $34=
9! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221881320x1201406166/aol?redir=
=3Dhttp:%2F%2
Fad.doubleclick.net%2Fclk%3B215218036%3B37264217%3Bz)

-------------------------------1244781665
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=3Drole_body style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY=
: Arial" 
bottomMargin=3D7 leftMargin=3D7 topMargin=3D7 rightMargin=3D7><FONT id=3Dr=
ole_document 
face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>
<DIV>Alas, I ignored my own Latvian "old saying" device about not stomping=
 in 
s**t because it only spreads and stinks and wrote a short tome on Aaviksoo=
.... A 
momentary failing. I'll try not to do again and just&nbsp;deal 
with&nbsp;PasswordUsername as dispassionately as&nbsp;possible until he 
implodes. I need to decide whether or not to file arb. enforcement. I know=
 what 
his responses are, the question is how airtight a case can be argued.</DIV=
>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>IMHO,&nbsp;his agenda to attack out anti-Soviet / anti-Russian propag=
anda 
editors is becoming quite clear, along with promoting the Baltics as a hot=
bed of 
Nazism.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>People always give up some information in their alter-egos. "Frank"=
 from 
Wichita? My ass. I can easily see someone who is NOT open and honest (i.e.=
, 
frank), choosing that as their pen name for their nefarious purposes. If=
 I'm 
sounding like Biophys, it's only because I've run into enough of these on=
 WP to 
develop radar. My Spidey sense is tingling.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>ON ANOTHER TOPIC, we need some sort of dynamic/automated article dash=
board. 
For example...</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>(1)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;list of ourselves and similar</DIV>
<DIV>(2)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;list of opposition</DIV>
<DIV>Using, say, 3 edits (not minor) in&nbsp;48 hours as a watermark (adju=
st 
empirically)</DIV>
<DIV>(3)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(a)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;list article,=
 GREEN, 
increased activity by (1)</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(b)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
&nbsp;AMBER, 
increased activity by (1), one or more edits by (2), # edits by (1) &gt;&g=
t; # 
edits by (2)</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(c)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
&nbsp;RED, 
activity by (1) and (2), more than N edits in 48 hours and/or # edits by=
 (2) 
&gt; # edits by (1)</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(d)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
&nbsp;RED, 
any article prior on the RED list which has not been touched (stable) whic=
h is 
edited out of the blue by (2)</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(e)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
&nbsp;BLUE, 
an article either GREEN, AMBER, or RED with no edits in the 48 hours (bots=
 
excluded)</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Dashboard would persist for 3 blue cycles, then article would age off=
 the 
list. Dashboard would (therefore) display 4 x 48 hours cycles. This could=
 be 
scaled to 24 from 48. We'd have to see what works. Of course, this can be=
 tuned 
up with historical data to see if problem articles immediately pop up.</DI=
V>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I need to do some more thinking on this. Clearly it is unproductive=
 for 
each of us individually or a group to be checking up on edits by people on=
 
articles which might not be on our watchlist. Personally, I do have a reas=
onable 
number of articles outside of our area of contention on my watchlist, so=
 I don't 
always catch things right away.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>/Peters</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></FONT><DIV CLASS=3D"aol_ad_footer" ID=3D"9e9911d8663d54d=
f2393e27967af03c8"><br/><font style=3D"color:black;font:normal 10pt arial,=
san-serif;"> <hr style=3D"margin-top:10px"/><A HREF=3Dhttp://pr.atwola.com=
/promoclk/100126575x1221881320x1201406166/aol?redir=3Dhttp:%2F%2Fad.double=
click.net%2Fclk%3B215218036%3B37264217%3Bz>Shop Dell&#39;s full line of La=
ptops now starting at $349!</A></font></DIV></BODY></HTML>

-------------------------------1244781665--


--===============3732325252498244938==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3732325252498244938==--


