X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 24 08:22:32 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A41BFE1.1040300@post.pl>
References: <be0.5d360a6b.3772dc2e@aol.com>
	<4f045a880906232114w3ff23eecq4003babb5cfb380e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A41BFE1.1040300@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:22:14 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906232322j75e49886l9c7e7f39b12c6b97@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:55, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Radek should question this restriction on him,
	it is quite unfair. He is > not mentioned at all in Shelly's report (it
	may be a good idea to write > to her and ask for help against Tatcher
	going too far). Tatcher cites > "Nashi (youth movement)" where Radek
	has
	reverted 3 times over the > period of 2 weeks, once with an edit
	summary, twice without. Hardly a > case of edit warring justifying half
	a year of 1RR restriction. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Hello, Martin
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4325523358675494438=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:55, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Radek should question this restriction on him,
	it is quite unfair. He is > not mentioned at all in Shelly's report (it
	may be a good idea to write > to her and ask for help against Tatcher
	going too far). Tatcher cites > "Nashi (youth movement)" where Radek has
	reverted 3 times over the > period of 2 weeks, once with an edit
	summary, twice without. Hardly a > case of edit warring justifying half
	a year of 1RR restriction. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4325523358675494438==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b4320fdb8992046d1220dd

--001636b4320fdb8992046d1220dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:55, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> Radek should question this restriction on him, it is quite unfair. He is
> not mentioned at all in Shelly's report (it may be a good idea to write
> to her and ask for help against Tatcher going too far). Tatcher cites
> "Nashi (youth movement)" where Radek has reverted 3 times over the
> period of 2 weeks, once with an edit summary, twice without. Hardly a
> case of edit warring justifying half a year of 1RR restriction.


I suspect Thatcher's goal here is to "root down that evil cabal", not
restrain edit warring.  I seem to recall he explained lengthily somewhere
that AE is *supposed* to be a hatchet and not a scalpel, and he has also
claimed that his 1RRW doesn't really restrict anybody.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636b4320fdb8992046d1220dd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:55, Piotr Konieczny <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">Radek should question this restriction on him, it is quit=
e unfair. He is<br></div>
not mentioned at all in Shelly&#39;s report (it may be a good idea to write=
<br>
to her and ask for help against Tatcher going too far). Tatcher cites<br>
&quot;Nashi (youth movement)&quot; where Radek has reverted 3 times over th=
e<br>
period of 2 weeks, once with an edit summary, twice without. Hardly a<br>
case of edit warring justifying half a year of 1RR restriction.</blockquote=
><div><br></div><div>I suspect Thatcher&#39;s goal here is to &quot;root do=
wn that evil cabal&quot;, not restrain edit warring. =C2=A0I seem to recall=
 he explained lengthily somewhere that AE is *supposed* to be a hatchet and=
 not a scalpel, and he has also claimed that his 1RRW doesn&#39;t really re=
strict anybody.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636b4320fdb8992046d1220dd--


--===============4325523358675494438==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4325523358675494438==--


