X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Sep  4 22:19:39 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4fbe29dd0909041309j2fb27201qa00aec48a341bd2c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4f045a880909032113r3873793fh58d4229ae9523edb@mail.gmail.com>
	<51803.15497.qm@web45107.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<c3b2b3db0909040642i333c291k17d6a7b0e899ef3@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0909040713w6455d0b5qfaf6261c86ccb43e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0909041205v3a9e2fal6c326c4ce33d6d38@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0909041232g2eaf7999s1044c1c0571a5685@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0909041309j2fb27201qa00aec48a341bd2c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 06:19:37 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880909041319r11cb1bc8x6fe00eb8245b7d22@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Taking it to ANI is a bit risky, how about posting a
	complaint, mentioning the four reverts to [[Monument at Lihula]], to
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rjanag citing his promise to
	block PU if he edit wars again. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] PU escapes clear 3RR violation
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Taking it to ANI is a bit risky, how about posting a
	complaint, mentioning the four reverts to [[Monument at Lihula]], to
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rjanag citing his promise to
	block PU if he edit wars again. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Taking it to ANI is a bit risky, how about posting a complaint,
mentioning the four reverts to [[Monument at Lihula]], to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rjanag
citing his promise to block PU if he edit wars again.



On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Sander S=E4de<sander.sade@gmail.com> wrote:
> AN/I is an excellent idea. Who wants the honor?
>
> S.
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:32 PM, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'd say combine it with the previous report and note the one filed for
>> "fence hugging" recently. Maybe take it to ANI rather than 3RR since 3RR=
 is
>> supposed to be preventative not punitive.
>>
>> Radek
>>
>>
>> 2009/9/4 Sander S=E4de <sander.sade@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DMonument_of_Lihula&action=
=3Dhistory
>>> - is self-reverting now an official way to escape edit-warring? Perhaps
>>> report anyway, as an obvious warrior
>>>
>>> S.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> See:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Ramzan_Kadyrov&diff=
=3D311801535&oldid=3D308234496
>>>>
>>>> They react in a few minutes
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Edits of PU are=A0 telling. Why on the Earth a Russian nationalist or=
 a
>>>>> pro-Soviet/pro-Communist editor would try to whitewash Ramzan Kadyrov?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DRamzan_Kadyrov&action=3Dh=
istory
>>>>>
>>>>> Because Kadyrov and his deeds are closely associated with Putin.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a group of editors (PU, Russavia. ellol and Offliner
>>>>> including) who are neither pro-Russian nationalists (like DonaldDuck =
and
>>>>> Ghirlandajo), nor pro-Soviet. They mostly care about anything related=
 to
>>>>> Putin and his administration, everything that paint them in negative =
light.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks that he was lucky again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Subject: [WPM] PU escapes clear 3RR violation
>>>>>> To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
>>>>>> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 8:13 PM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What a joke. Some newbie admin (only joined Wikipedia a year ago) le=
ts
>>>>>> him off with a warning, then promptly archived the report
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard=
/Edit_warring#User:PasswordUsername_reported_by_User:Martintg_.28Result:_Wa=
rned.29
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And I end up getting a warning too!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>>>>>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>>>>>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>>>>>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>>>>>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>>>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>>>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>



-- =

Regards,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

