X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 14 19:03:08 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A352855.8050906@post.pl>
References: <960568.11005.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<4f045a880906140403s72981b45rf4637171b9a02615@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906140435m2d05aaeaie9e2b51a864130a0@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906140444n44fcff93n30f04a77ea3955cc@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906140700g752710adke6a57dbf9250c8f7@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906140742h200f1a2bk7d266ba2df278d5d@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70906140746m3c83639cne6caa4f1e48a4e52@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A352855.8050906@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:02:55 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0906141002u773f3a9esd404226f6a48568c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Sure thing, I looked at his other contributions too:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pol_Pot&diff=prev&oldid=546354
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Mugabe&diff=prev&oldid=546123
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Mikkalai
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0306464523756809211=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Sure thing, I looked at his other contributions too:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pol_Pot&diff=prev&oldid=546354
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Mugabe&diff=prev&oldid=546123
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0306464523756809211==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d59e1faec5a4046c51e930

--0016e6d59e1faec5a4046c51e930
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sure thing, I looked at his other contributions too:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pol_Pot&diff=prev&oldid=546354

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Mugabe&diff=prev&oldid=546123

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Stalin&diff=prev&oldid=546032

And so on, and so on. I am not certain  if he is JP.  But JP was vely
knowlegable about Lenin's writings and other  subjects - quite possibly a
Soviet "academic".


On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote:
> > If 172 were puppet master  ''Jacob Peters'', how come all those
> > checkusers failed to reveal him? Would a shameless stalinist troll
> > with not much of iontellect successfully play the role of some scholar
> > for a long time? No, my two cents, but you may want to try a specific
> > CU, of course.
>
> I don't think there is much connection between 172 and JP. Long time ago
> I cooperated with 172 on Polish-Soviet War and had a positive
> experience; I respect him, while acknowledging his background (he is a
> Russian emigree academic living on US East coast). As far as I know, 172
> is a reasonable editor of Russian background. This
> (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decommunization_in_Russia&diff=295113031&oldid=291631836
> )
> hardly proves that he is a commie sympathizer.
>
> Remember - we are looking for trends, not exceptions/outliers). If you
> look hard enough, you may find edits by me that can be seen as
> pro-Soviet (heck, I wrote
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Brest_Fortress once, an article
> about a major Soviet propaganda-celebrated battle).
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--0016e6d59e1faec5a4046c51e930
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sure thing, I looked at his other contributions too:<br><br><a href=3D"http=
://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DPol_Pot&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=
=3D546354">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DPol_Pot&amp;diff=3Dp=
rev&amp;oldid=3D546354</a><br>
<br><a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DRobert_Mugabe&am=
p;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D546123">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=
=3DRobert_Mugabe&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D546123</a><br><br><a href=3D"h=
ttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DJoseph_Stalin&amp;diff=3Dprev&am=
p;oldid=3D546032">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DJoseph_Stalin=
&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D546032</a><br>
<br>And so on, and so on. I am not certain=A0 if he is JP.=A0 But JP was ve=
ly knowlegable about Lenin&#39;s writings and other=A0 subjects - quite pos=
sibly a Soviet &quot;academic&quot;.  <br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote=
">On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Piotr Konieczny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;p=
iokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, =
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class=3D"im"=
>Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote:<br>
&gt; If 172 were puppet master =A0&#39;&#39;Jacob Peters&#39;&#39;, how com=
e all those<br>
&gt; checkusers failed to reveal him? Would a shameless stalinist troll<br>
&gt; with not much of iontellect successfully play the role of some scholar=
<br>
&gt; for a long time? No, my two cents, but you may want to try a specific<=
br>
&gt; CU, of course.<br>
<br>
</div>I don&#39;t think there is much connection between 172 and JP. Long t=
ime ago<br>
I cooperated with 172 on Polish-Soviet War and had a positive<br>
experience; I respect him, while acknowledging his background (he is a<br>
Russian emigree academic living on US East coast). As far as I know, 172<br=
>
is a reasonable editor of Russian background. This<br>
(<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DDecommunization_in_=
Russia&amp;diff=3D295113031&amp;oldid=3D291631836" target=3D"_blank">http:/=
/en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DDecommunization_in_Russia&amp;diff=3D=
295113031&amp;oldid=3D291631836</a>)<br>

hardly proves that he is a commie sympathizer.<br>
<br>
Remember - we are looking for trends, not exceptions/outliers). If you<br>
look hard enough, you may find edits by me that can be seen as<br>
pro-Soviet (heck, I wrote<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Brest_Fortress" target=
=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Brest_Fortress</a> once=
, an article<br>
about a major Soviet propaganda-celebrated battle).<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
</font><div class=3D"im">Piotr Konieczny<br>
<br>
&quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=
<br>
theory.&quot;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">Wikipedia statistics discussion lis=
t<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e6d59e1faec5a4046c51e930--


--===============0306464523756809211==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0306464523756809211==--


