X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed May 20 19:14:38 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0905200639s5a8df2b6md0ac1a65de592b71@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0905200639s5a8df2b6md0ac1a65de592b71@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:14:05 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0905201014o669b89ufe990347cb8c3da5@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.9
X-Spam_score_int: -8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  In US press the AP story is making the rounds:
	http://www.startribune.com/world/45390262.html?elr=KArks:DCiUBcy7hUiacyKUnciaec8O7EyUr
	(same story in most major newspapers and on tv (CBS, Fox, maybe others).
	There's some criticisms quoted on the second and third page, though not
	that much. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.9 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] advance warning of poo in flight,
	arrival at the fan 	scheduled for near future
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.0
X-Spam_score_int: 20
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  In US press the AP story is making the rounds:
	http://www.startribune.com/world/45390262.html?elr=KArks:DCiUBcy7hUiacyKUnciaec8O7EyUr
	(same story in most major newspapers and on tv (CBS, Fox, maybe others).
	There's some criticisms quoted on the second and third page, though not
	that much. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.9 SUBJ_HAS_SPACES        Subject contains lots of white space
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4694]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

In US press the AP story is making the rounds:
http://www.startribune.com/world/45390262.html?elr=3DKArks:DCiUBcy7hUiacyKU=
nciaec8O7EyUr
(same story in most major newspapers and on tv (CBS, Fox, maybe
others). There's some criticisms quoted on the second and third page,
though not that much.

Polish Rzeczpospolita also reported on the reaction in the Russian
press (http://www.rp.pl/artykul/29,308222_Rosyjska_prasa_o__komisji_Miedwie=
diewa_.html),
and some of the reaction in Ukraine
(http://www.rp.pl/artykul/29,308244_Powrot_do_kontrolowania_historii.html).
Sorry that it's in Polish - I could probably add something to the
article based on those though. The Russian newspapers the article
quotes are Vedomosti, Nezavisimaya Gazeta and Kommersant.


Radek

2009/5/20 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> Not the best timing, but unfortunately, this can not be delayed.
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Truth_Commission>.
> Note my framing of the issue. =A0Beware that the Web Brigades will invest
> quite a lot of effort in reframing it, and particularly, to declare the
> commission as a reliable source for Wikipedia purposes.
>
> Talking point re naming:
> * The commission's official name is very long, and ill-suited for
> Wikipedia's article. =A0A shorter name is inevitably needed. =A0I borrowe=
d this
> one from a commentary by Marko Mihkelson, but there's a considerable chan=
ce
> that the Brigades might not appreciate this one.
> Interestingly, it appears some Russian newspapers have undertaken to
> criticise the commission. =A0I do not yet have enough details to construc=
t a
> defendable criticism section, however.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

