X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun  3 08:05:58 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A2612A2.7030607@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:05:22 +0200
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <4A238480.5040704@post.pl>
	<4A2446A2.6050103@post.pl>	<25890ca0906011447k468639bbh9c98539fd7421db9@mail.gmail.com>	<4A24C39C.4040800@post.pl>
	<4A257698.4030404@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906021329l7c76574cy93e61eded0743e5@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906021329l7c76574cy93e61eded0743e5@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > Well, Sandstein closed the case
	with a 6 month topic ban. I'm > wondering if this was done so quickly
	to
	limit the damage (I was > hoping it would linger there long enough for
	Matthead to get a chance > to express his feelings) - since if other
	admins got involved in > addition to the topic ban he could've gotten a
	block. This way it > doesn't go into his block log. We'll see if he can
	stand it. > I'm also wondering if I shouldn't bring up what he left on
	my talk > page to ANI just for incivility but don't want to look like
	I'm > vindictive about this. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Smith2006
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > Well, Sandstein closed the case
	with a 6 month topic ban. I'm > wondering if this was done so quickly to
	limit the damage (I was > hoping it would linger there long enough for
	Matthead to get a chance > to express his feelings) - since if other
	admins got involved in > addition to the topic ban he could've gotten a
	block. This way it > doesn't go into his block log. We'll see if he can
	stand it. > I'm also wondering if I shouldn't bring up what he left on
	my talk > page to ANI just for incivility but don't want to look like
	I'm > vindictive about this. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

radek szulga wrote:
> Well, Sandstein closed the case with a 6 month topic ban. I'm
> wondering if this was done so quickly to limit the damage (I was
> hoping it would linger there long enough for Matthead to get a chance
> to express his feelings) - since if other admins got involved in
> addition to the topic ban he could've gotten a block. This way it
> doesn't go into his block log. We'll see if he can stand it.
> I'm also wondering if I shouldn't bring up what he left on my talk
> page to ANI just for incivility but don't want to look like I'm
> vindictive about this.

You can ask Sandstein to expand his topic ban into a civility ban as well.


-- 
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

