X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jul 12 04:58:40 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <66309.31201.qm@web45114.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0907111341w126559fax4eb89c5e8de5d294@mail.gmail.com>
	<66309.31201.qm@web45114.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:58:17 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880907111958g2486ab52v6f0fcd9b767c0832@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I read AdjustShift's comments, they are brilliant
	because in pleading with Sandstein to be lenient, it will probably
	reinforce the impression in Sandstein's mind that that Skapperod's AE
	report is an abuse of AE. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] RfC regarding Skapperod
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I read AdjustShift's comments, they are brilliant
	because in pleading with Sandstein to be lenient, it will probably
	reinforce the impression in Sandstein's mind that that Skapperod's AE
	report is an abuse of AE. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I read AdjustShift's comments, they are brilliant because in pleading
with Sandstein to be lenient, it will probably reinforce the
impression in Sandstein's mind that that Skapperod's AE report is an
abuse of AE.

Martin

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Jack<jacurek@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Somebody should comment, AdjustShift is so much=A0pro Skapeord.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sandstein#Sk.C3.A4pper.C3.B6d
> Jacek
>
> --- On Sat, 7/11/09, Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [WPM] RfC regarding Skapperod
> To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
> Date: Saturday, July 11, 2009, 12:41 PM
>
> Adjustshift is clearly our problem here. His views are clearly
> pro-German as seen in=A0 this outburst:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk%3AExpulsion_of_Germans_a=
fter_World_War_II&diff=3D299648950&oldid=3D299645499
>
> 2009/7/11 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>:
>> I think we should wait on the RfC until we have a pretty strong case -
>> otherwise it might be seen the same way that Skapperod's latest is being
>> interpreted, as just more Eastern European bickering and spurious report=
s.
>> We should save Sandstein's comments
>>
>> [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Reque=
sts/Enforcement&diff=3Dnext&oldid=3D301570502]
>> and Adjust Shift's pleading
>>
>> [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Sandstein&diff=3D=
301581443&oldid=3D301571717]
>> to use as part of the RfC in the future.
>>
>> Radek
>>
>>
>> 2009/7/11 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> To all email users-this message comes with text file where I wrote
>>> down my earlier draft of my RFC against Skapperod.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>



-- =

Regards,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

