X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 19 19:58:01 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A3BD227.2080105@post.pl>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:00:07 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>	<c3b2b3db0906181257q5ee1749ap4872a277af9b7a6f@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0906181304x6fab2980se600cc88f41aaaf8@mail.gmail.com>	<c3b2b3db0906181350i5fbd4cc9u41114510a11eab2@mail.gmail.com>	<c3b2b3db0906181358tec27236w5a3ad45a11e02432@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0906190014k624acd6as6a0793df5398e54d@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0906190412i80309d6kf23d7967fc7b8764@mail.gmail.com>	<c3b2b3db0906190619j14cfa570u7a77a29a69336ac4@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0906190715w6e35fd30j508a40422aedcbef@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906191029t9a8ab49jc2c0922a0b24c1cd@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906191029t9a8ab49jc2c0922a0b24c1cd@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Andrei Dombay wrote: > I am afraid this will be seen
	as
	an intentional disruption, an action > intended to "generate a lot of
	dramu", exactly as you tell. And it may > be punished as [[WP:POINT]].
	People are really getting tired of our > dramas. Let's be quite. My
	filing was obviously a bad mistake. We > should not make things worse
	ourselves. Our opponents will do it. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Andrei Dombay wrote: > I am afraid this will be seen as
	an intentional disruption, an action > intended to "generate a lot of
	dramu", exactly as you tell. And it may > be punished as [[WP:POINT]].
	People are really getting tired of our > dramas. Let's be quite. My
	filing was obviously a bad mistake. We > should not make things worse
	ourselves. Our opponents will do it. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Andrei Dombay wrote:
> I am afraid this will be seen as an intentional disruption, an action 
> intended to "generate a lot of dramu", exactly as you tell. And it may 
> be punished as [[WP:POINT]]. People are really getting tired of our 
> dramas. Let's be quite.  My filing was obviously a bad mistake. We 
> should not make things worse ourselves. Our opponents will do it.

I think it was suggested before here that we should not post non-3RR 
reports (AE, RFC, etc.) without discussing them here. Such discussion 
can result in better diffs, better argument and better strategic timing.

Once again I'll implore those of us who have their own websites to 
consider setting up MediaWiki for us. I strongly believe that we will 
not be at our optimal potential till we can collaborate via our own 
MediaWiki.

An alternative would involve "hijacking" a wiki for this purpose... I am 
an admin at two Media Wikis and could justify hosting some strange 
invisible page at both - but to be honest, I'd prefer not to. Or perhaps 
we could simply start some free MediaWiki on some wikifarm? Wikia, perhaps?

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

