X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Apr 24 18:36:02 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <866941.13488.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: muHGpggVM1k3Hzfmx2YdsSijcUb28Tb3Me13yW7vfvwcp4ufNEGTsunMaf0nPS2R80K8bRTpnxr_EUqh8Zm.gdPD1d2VipLdIp9Pz8qpzdPNcTGAwNMtmEUR.unuwG7k40PLHriTKGZmnaTdVauWRe0KmNsOaw7nD8myKuETj.eFFhspaJAYTm7lBo50IDaoKU1jVkMrGq1rQHUd.E0mpx66uRVxRlVr7hbVyhrCDuu4_OZmLTclArGNmWB6N6kckc7rhDhvFCjR1A80l8fLYbrn3MTgUHBbUZGRc1tdM9.adquf
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.2.19 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: 1.8
X-Spam_score_int: 18
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Even if the GFDL argument is bogus,
	we don't need to let
	the vulgus know that, do we? One more accusation against Russavia, even
	if false, can only help us. Even if the GFDL argument is bogus, we don't
	need to let the vulgus know that, do we? One more accusation against
	Russavia, even if false, can only help us. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.8 BLANK_LINES_70_80      BODY: Message body has 70-80% blank lines
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	BLANK_LINES_70_80,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_50_60,
	HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] GFDL
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6306279441581987751=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.7
X-Spam_score_int: 27
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Even if the GFDL argument is bogus, we don't need to let
	the vulgus know that, do we? One more accusation against Russavia, even
	if false, can only help us. Even if the GFDL argument is bogus, we don't
	need to let the vulgus know that, do we? One more accusation against
	Russavia, even if false, can only help us. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.0 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS          Subject is all capitals
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.5000]
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============6306279441581987751==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-324122128-1240590949=:13488"


--0-324122128-1240590949=:13488
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Even if the GFDL argument is bogus, we don't need to let the vulgus know that, do we? One more accusation against Russavia, even if false, can only help us.


      
--0-324122128-1240590949=:13488
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Even if the GFDL argument is bogus, we don't need to let the <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">vulgus</span> know that, do we? One more accusation against Russavia, even if false, can only help us.</td></tr></table><br>



      
--0-324122128-1240590949=:13488--


--===============6306279441581987751==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6306279441581987751==--


