X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul  3 23:09:07 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0907030405g42795161v42139e17b152138e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <494251.20348.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0907021159x7147392cp96ebd160280186a7@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907021219j18907539n807d56fbeddfdd9c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4D2426.4020701@post.pl>
	<25890ca0907021428s5997a90as447efda71372cc26@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4D280F.7090905@post.pl>
	<25890ca0907021446x1c20adaag965ad81dc2a9b51a@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907021634w6bc61f23k31b807685662b95f@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907021754n3cd9a333h607ea5776c255c2@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0907030405g42795161v42139e17b152138e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 07:08:39 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880907031408t487aa910p436079981d590911@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I may be wrong, and Piotr could correct me,
	but there is
	nothing in policy specifically against serial accounts. It only becomes
	an issue if the original account was perma-banned or otherwise evading
	a
	sanction, or multiple accounts used simultaneously in vote stacking or
	revert warring. But if a new account is created every few months and
	the
	old account discarded in a serial fashion, then I don't see that there
	would be a problem. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Hanzo (was Women and Wiklp)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I may be wrong, and Piotr could correct me, but there is
	nothing in policy specifically against serial accounts. It only becomes
	an issue if the original account was perma-banned or otherwise evading a
	sanction, or multiple accounts used simultaneously in vote stacking or
	revert warring. But if a new account is created every few months and the
	old account discarded in a serial fashion, then I don't see that there
	would be a problem. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I may be wrong, and Piotr could correct me, but there is nothing in
policy specifically against serial accounts. It only becomes an issue
if the original account was perma-banned or otherwise evading a
sanction, or multiple accounts used simultaneously in vote stacking or
revert warring. But if a new account is created every few months and
the old account discarded in a serial fashion, then I don't see that
there would be a problem.

Martin

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Digwuren<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 03:54, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> OK, I made a comment. Unfortunately, Russavia came too.
>
> This is an incentive for changing accounts almost as often as socks. =A0S=
ince
> Wikipedia values newbies more highly than people who have been "involved =
in
> wikidrama", frequent account changes are favoured=A0by the existing frame=
work
> as a way to get rid of the=A0sticky=A0mud.
> Frequent account-changes tend to throw off track both slow-acting DDR such
> as arbcom *and* stalkers. =A0The main risk is that some or all of the acc=
ounts
> may be labelled as sock puppets of each other or somebody else, and
> summarily blocked.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

