X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri May 29 17:05:39 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0905290734n72aba5e5q3afd777a8d51e227@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6fb557d70905290510g2f01d0f4mb3f7926696939dae@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0905290734n72aba5e5q3afd777a8d51e227@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:05:18 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70905290805k2acbf182i1330b6122096bd7b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Petri Krohn has been banned again (a good thing, such
	POV-pushers have no place in an encyclopaedia). What did Digwuren mean
	by ''chatting at HistoricWarrior007's talkpage''? I didn't grasp
	anything when checking this
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HistoricWarrior007&action=history.
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] banning Petr Krohn?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Petri Krohn has been banned again (a good thing, such
	POV-pushers have no place in an encyclopaedia). What did Digwuren mean
	by ''chatting at HistoricWarrior007's talkpage''? I didn't grasp
	anything when checking this
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HistoricWarrior007&action=history.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Petri Krohn has been banned again (a good thing, such POV-pushers have
no place in an encyclopaedia). What did Digwuren mean by ''chatting at
HistoricWarrior007's talkpage''? I didn't grasp anything when checking
this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:HistoricWarrior0=
07&action=3Dhistory.

As for Russavia, I think he would be busy enough when dealing with
those Putin phenomena (y'know, all those cats and dogs mr. Putin has).
He's either too smart or too reasonable to to engage in blatant
POV-pushing, I think.


Miacek and his rabid dog.

On 29/05/2009, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 15:10, Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <
> miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, if anyone still hasn't noticed that procedure, then here it is
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Inc=
idents#Threat_by_User:Petri_Krohn
>>
>> Whilst en bloc voting is not a good idea (what is more: it is
>> counterproductive), we should keep an eye on those developments. I
>> sincerely hope, he'll get banned.
>
>
> He got another one-year block.  Which is about as good, and probably
> slightly harder to appeal.  Plus, there's a chance he won't come back aft=
er
> the year.
>
> A user like Petri
>>
> Krohn should have no place in Wikipedia.
>
>
> What will Safka do now that their foremost link to Wikipedia is blocked?
>  I'd say there's a chance that B=E4ckman or Hietanen will become a regula=
r.
>  The anonymous user who has been hanging out at B=E4ckman's article alrea=
dy
> may be one of them.
>
> Then again, Safka may consider Finnish Wikipedia a more important outlet,
> and AFAIK, Petri Krohn is not blocked there.
>
> Speaking of anonymouses, certain details make me suspect that the anonymo=
us
> who has been chatting at HistoricWarrior007's talkpage is Kuban Kazak.  B=
ut
> the evidence is currently scant, and he doesn't appear to have become a
> major nuisance yet, so I don't think an action is viable at this time.
>
> Shall we do something about Russavia's reiteration of the ideas that got
> Petri Krohn banned?
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

