X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Apr 28 22:02:58 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <49F7613B.6070307@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:04:11 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <226476.72978.qm@web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	<c3b2b3db0904271114y495f9b0dl1328b86a07723d9f@mail.gmail.com>	<f826636f0904271358r8c08b23ifc2991dde9e442c6@mail.gmail.com>	<c3b2b3db0904271410w78ed56bbh730525025f0dccd4@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0904272130n43965cf2m9305908aaf6ad130@mail.gmail.com>	<4f045a880904272214n1e851002v67f3b5063d94b95b@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0904272221n218358d2h65c04bd5570cbec2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0904272221n218358d2h65c04bd5570cbec2@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Digwuren wrote: > UKUSA would probably not be inclined
	to share its ECHELON yield with > Russia. Hence, my little conspiracy
	theory postulated infiltration by > the infamous Chinese
	cyberintelligence troops. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > UKUSA would probably not be inclined
	to share its ECHELON yield with > Russia. Hence, my little conspiracy
	theory postulated infiltration by > the infamous Chinese
	cyberintelligence troops. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Digwuren wrote:

> UKUSA would probably not be inclined to share its ECHELON yield with 
> Russia.  Hence, my little conspiracy theory postulated infiltration by 
> the infamous Chinese cyberintelligence troops.

Infamous doesn't mean good. I'd personally bet that the fact that it was 
discovered means that this Chinese operation 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GhostNet) was probably amateurish. I 
really find it hard to believe that Chinese would be more advanced then 
the West.

Btw, I found an interesting orphan article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_hacking

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

