X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul  3 22:18:54 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 23:18:49 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0907031318o1ce54b82x924fb078fbd31e40@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Maybe a couple of you could help me in the talk page
	of
	this article. Dahn has added 5 tags to the entire article. I suggested
	to keep 2 of them and move 3 section-wise (where necessary), but he
	objects and reverted me. This worked in the past: we did not have tags
	for the article as a whole, but tags for different sections and
	sub-sections. If you have more time, you might take one or several tags
	and move them section-wise. That means to have enough time to read the
	article. But if you do have enough time to read the article, do not be
	hold back if you see possibilities to edit - do edit the article, if you
	have something in mind. For example, one tag is about weasel words. You
	can correct some, and thus help remove this tag. Do not be afraid to add
	{{cn}} tags. I have more sources now than in the past. And so on. If
	you
	edit something, however small, your comment in the talk page would bear
	more weight. Anything you do would help. But do not try to overdo
	things, don't try to address everything. Little by little, issue by
	issue - this is how we managed to keep (and develop) this article so
	far against the Soviet sympathyzers. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] [[Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina]]
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5360876275629484261=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Maybe a couple of you could help me in the talk page of
	this article. Dahn has added 5 tags to the entire article. I suggested
	to keep 2 of them and move 3 section-wise (where necessary), but he
	objects and reverted me. This worked in the past: we did not have tags
	for the article as a whole, but tags for different sections and
	sub-sections. If you have more time, you might take one or several tags
	and move them section-wise. That means to have enough time to read the
	article. But if you do have enough time to read the article, do not be
	hold back if you see possibilities to edit - do edit the article, if you
	have something in mind. For example, one tag is about weasel words. You
	can correct some, and thus help remove this tag. Do not be afraid to add
	{{cn}} tags. I have more sources now than in the past. And so on. If you
	edit something, however small, your comment in the talk page would bear
	more weight. Anything you do would help. But do not try to overdo
	things, don't try to address everything. Little by little, issue by
	issue - this is how we managed to keep (and develop) this article so far
	against the Soviet sympathyzers. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5360876275629484261==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6db61963e65c3046dd2ddee

--0016e6db61963e65c3046dd2ddee
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Maybe a couple of you could help me in the talk page of this article. Dahn
has added 5 tags to the entire article. I suggested to keep 2 of them and
move 3 section-wise (where necessary), but he objects and reverted me. This
worked in the past: we did not have tags for the article as a whole, but
tags for different sections and sub-sections.
If you have more time, you might take one or several tags and move them
section-wise. That means to have enough time to read the article. But if you
do have enough time to read the article, do not be hold back if you see
possibilities to edit - do edit the article, if you have something in mind.
For example, one tag is about weasel words. You can correct some, and thus
help remove this tag. Do not be afraid to add {{cn}} tags. I have more
sources now than in the past. And so on. If you edit something, however
small, your comment in the talk page would bear more weight. Anything you do
would help. But do not try to overdo things, don't try to address
everything. Little by little, issue by issue - this is how we managed to
keep (and develop) this article so far against the Soviet sympathyzers.

Dorin

P.S. I have recently edited a little bit [[Soviet occupations]], so if you
have edited that article in the past, you can claim you came to read this
article [[Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina]] because my
and Christian's edits there made you curious. 2-3 of you might even have the
latter article in "my watchlist".

N.B. Not urgent, on the contrary it would be best if no more than 2 people
come on the same day, preferably even only one new per day.

--0016e6db61963e65c3046dd2ddee
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Maybe a couple of you could help me in the talk page of this article. Dahn =
has added 5 tags to the entire article. I suggested to keep 2 of them and m=
ove 3 section-wise (where necessary), but he objects and reverted me. This =
worked in the past: we did not have tags for the article as a whole, but ta=
gs for different sections and sub-sections.=A0<div>
<br></div><div>If you have more time, you might take one or several tags an=
d move them section-wise. That means to have enough time to read the articl=
e. But if you do have enough time to read the article, do not be hold back =
if you see possibilities to edit - do edit the article, if you have somethi=
ng in mind. For example, one tag is about weasel words. You can correct som=
e, and thus help remove this tag. Do not be afraid to add {{cn}} tags. I ha=
ve more sources now than in the past. And so on. If you edit something, how=
ever small, your comment in the talk page would bear more weight. Anything =
you do would help. But do not try to overdo things, don&#39;t try to addres=
s everything. Little by little, issue by issue - this is how we managed to =
keep (and develop) this article so far against the Soviet sympathyzers.=A0<=
/div>
<div><br></div><div>Dorin</div><div><br></div><div>P.S. I have recently edi=
ted a little bit [[Soviet occupations]], so if you have edited that article=
 in the past, you can claim you came to read this article [[Soviet occupati=
on of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina]] because my and Christian&#39;s edi=
ts there made you curious. 2-3 of you might even have the latter article in=
 &quot;my watchlist&quot;.=A0</div>
<div><br></div><div>N.B. Not urgent, on the contrary it would be best if no=
 more than 2 people come on the same day, preferably even only one new per =
day.=A0</div>

--0016e6db61963e65c3046dd2ddee--


--===============5360876275629484261==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5360876275629484261==--


