X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jul  7 01:04:15 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A5282D8.5000604@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:03:52 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <25890ca0907031517taba84aaodd143d82c724e8db@mail.gmail.com>	<f826636f0907031633k14728337sfa20bc7a8367e8f9@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0907031639h19715086y5d9533e5add2fb37@mail.gmail.com>	<4A4ED100.3020503@post.pl>	<25890ca0907061316m561fbba4xb7350278973d724@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0907061321w3bb0ed45ne1c45a022b2a4ea3@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0907061327p1c5ce381yc5496196b7b7e8f4@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0907061547r48b175adk91f8f9cc8fc69339@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0907061547r48b175adk91f8f9cc8fc69339@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 23:27, radek
	szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com > <mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com>> wrote: > > So
	he took Offliner and PU off of it too, along with Colchicum, > Marting
	and Biophys. > I know you guys said that he was a 'serious admin' but
	this smacks a > little of trying to save as much from a situation that
	(maybe) was > turning against him. > > > This *is* how a serious
	Wikipedian operates. In the immortal words of a > famous mortal, > >
	/You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, > Know when to
	walk away and know when to run./ > > > Incidentally, my restrictions
	weren't lifted. Apparently, by never > editing at all since before it
	was instituted, I'm more likely to get > into revert wars than, say, PU.
	Why? I'm not entirely sure, but my > best guess is: because the Serious
	Administrator does not consider me > threatening. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appeal
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 23:27, radek
	szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com > <mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com>> wrote: > > So
	he took Offliner and PU off of it too, along with Colchicum, > Marting
	and Biophys. > I know you guys said that he was a 'serious admin' but
	this smacks a > little of trying to save as much from a situation that
	(maybe) was > turning against him. > > > This *is* how a serious
	Wikipedian operates. In the immortal words of a > famous mortal, > >
	/You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, > Know when to
	walk away and know when to run./ > > > Incidentally, my restrictions
	weren't lifted. Apparently, by never > editing at all since before it
	was instituted, I'm more likely to get > into revert wars than, say, PU.
	Why? I'm not entirely sure, but my > best guess is: because the Serious
	Administrator does not consider me > threatening. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Digwuren wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 23:27, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com 
> <mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     So he took Offliner and PU off of it too, along with Colchicum,
>     Marting and Biophys.
>     I know you guys said that he was a 'serious admin' but this smacks a
>     little of trying to save as much from a situation that (maybe) was
>     turning against him.
> 
> 
> This *is* how a serious Wikipedian operates.  In the immortal words of a 
> famous mortal,
> 
>     /You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em,
>     Know when to walk away and know when to run./
> 
> 
> Incidentally, my restrictions weren't lifted.  Apparently, by never 
> editing at all since before it was instituted, I'm more likely to get 
> into revert wars than, say, PU.  Why?  I'm not entirely sure, but my 
> best guess is: because the Serious Administrator does not consider me 
> threatening.

Might as well jump on the bandwagon and ask Thatcher to remove your 
restrictions.

Sigh. It seems he is trying to prove a POINT along the lines "I am 100% 
right, if you think I was wrong, I am taking all my toys home, including 
all of those that everyone approved of and nobody criticized". 
Childish... I wonder if she is a teen. But than, after dealing with 
Elonka, I am no longer subscribing childish behavior to teens alone :(

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

