X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  9 10:25:40 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A2E1714.4060603@post.pl>
References: <6c9a05ec0906060616s7dd20794o40b98d98be6687c8@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906071711s582ed998kd1d2a6b2ae04c432@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906072316l54bd7f3cr8db9d08928734a3a@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2CD905.8030904@post.pl> <4A2CE548.60607@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0906080626n2ba36a96id98c930a3d94221b@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906081106w5343e102rb5326d0a9965e5ba@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906081128i6518aa43nad634af788a23026@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906090048w579bf962k8743af75ef900ceb@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2E1714.4060603@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:25:21 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906090125j37476833g4dc26f2a8f7f2b9c@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  The admins are not stupid, and I'm sure they saw this
	growing and getting messier and messier. They could've made a quick
	ruling to that effect fairly early on if they only timed it right in
	between the opposing side's comment, and made the discussion stop. AGK
	pretty much did that on Deacon, more or less. But not here. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Skapperod on the roll
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  The admins are not stupid, and I'm sure they saw this
	growing and getting messier and messier. They could've made a quick
	ruling to that effect fairly early on if they only timed it right in
	between the opposing side's comment, and made the discussion stop. AGK
	pretty much did that on Deacon, more or less. But not here. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

The admins are not stupid, and I'm sure they saw this growing and
getting messier and messier. They could've made a quick ruling to that
effect fairly early on if they only timed it right in between the
opposing side's comment, and made the discussion stop. AGK pretty much
did that on Deacon, more or less. But not here.

And the fact is that if an editor accused of 3RR makes a half decent
defense, claims absent mindness or the like, and makes some vague
promises about something somewhere, especially if he's got a clean
record like Skapperod they'll let him off. So once a discussion
developed it was hard to avoid it after a certain point.

Part of me thinks that William M. Connolley actually enjoys watching
and arbitrating these things (he's made some funny/snarky comments on
3RR reports before as in "you almost got him this time, but no block,
better luck next time" etc.) so he just let it go to see how far it
would go (don't know about the other admins)

Radek


2009/6/9 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> radek szulga wrote:
>> WHY is that 3RR report still open? Every other single 3RR report on
>> that page has been dealt with, including 8 that followed that one.
>> None of the admins have chimed in which they usually do. There's some
>> good to this as it's given Deacon another opportunity to show up and
>> make another insulting comment. But I'm just tired out by it.
>> Skapperod's latest "amendments" are at =A07:38 June 9, I filed it at
>> 5:39 June 8, so it's been more than 24 hrs. And now he's gone from
>> "squirming" to "weaseling".
>
> Length. A lesson for the future: try to avoid discussions at 3RR. Now
> the admins are looking at it in disgust, and it is likely to be closed
> as "stale minor violation, no result."
>
>
> --
> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here." =A0 =A0 |||
> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
> =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

