X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Aug 19 16:32:54 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:32:47 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0908190732o7be5947ey2741cb6ba8dd742d@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Ok,
	so how does a check user request exactly work? Do I
	have to justify a request for it and if so with how much detail? Should
	I list whom I want the anon checked "against"? Is there a cost to
	including a name or two extra (to make sure)? Is there a potential
	downside - I'm sure someone will scream "hounding" or something, but is
	there a danger here? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: [WPM] check user
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2105717320961332235=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Ok, so how does a check user request exactly work? Do I
	have to justify a request for it and if so with how much detail? Should
	I list whom I want the anon checked "against"? Is there a cost to
	including a name or two extra (to make sure)? Is there a potential
	downside - I'm sure someone will scream "hounding" or something, but is
	there a danger here? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2105717320961332235==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65aedce4959ce04717f82ba

--0016e65aedce4959ce04717f82ba
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ok, so how does a check user request exactly work? Do I have to justify a
request for it and if so with how much detail? Should I list whom I want the
anon checked "against"? Is there a cost to including a name or two extra (to
make sure)? Is there a potential downside - I'm sure someone will scream
"hounding" or something, but is there a danger here?

Radek

--0016e65aedce4959ce04717f82ba
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ok, so how does a check user request exactly work? Do I have to justify a r=
equest for it and if so with how much detail? Should I list whom I want the=
 anon checked &quot;against&quot;? Is there a cost to including a name or t=
wo extra (to make sure)? Is there a potential downside - I&#39;m sure someo=
ne will scream &quot;hounding&quot; or something, but is there a danger her=
e?<br>
<br>Radek<br>

--0016e65aedce4959ce04717f82ba--


--===============2105717320961332235==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2105717320961332235==--


