X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu May 28 08:25:44 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A1E2E3F.30306@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:25:03 +0200
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <6c9a05ec0905231259r4ffb1fa7i350386b8cd565ea@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0905240459g618ce5bbod4c4be35baa9d4df@mail.gmail.com>	<4f045a880905241413v2e69659dt38897431bfaa4f9a@mail.gmail.com>	<4A1B0B07.8070607@post.pl>
	<4A1C2981.5070801@post.pl>	<25890ca0905261104q5c8255esa31cff6978356cdf@mail.gmail.com>	<4A1C5890.7070103@post.pl>	<4f045a880905261543v482cac2ew3343341990304cb6@mail.gmail.com>	<4A1D9D29.5020807@post.pl>
	<25890ca0905271342p2266776el5ab3e92702419fef@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0905271342p2266776el5ab3e92702419fef@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: radek szulga wrote: > The only thing is that the
	person
	who removed those comments, Mayalld, > seems to quite sympathetic to the
	view that this case was a mess from > the get go and that all this
	secret stuff should've never happened. > Basically I think s/he is just
	generally annoyed at how this was > handled and so he's trying to
	re-focus it. So we don't want to annoy > him more than the other side.
	>
	But fuss maybe a good idea - particularly since Deacon's comment "The >
	unpublished evidence makes it highly likely that Molobo ..." was not >
	removed - maybe just ask Mayalld why that was left in there. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon and Molobo
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > The only thing is that the person
	who removed those comments, Mayalld, > seems to quite sympathetic to the
	view that this case was a mess from > the get go and that all this
	secret stuff should've never happened. > Basically I think s/he is just
	generally annoyed at how this was > handled and so he's trying to
	re-focus it. So we don't want to annoy > him more than the other side. >
	But fuss maybe a good idea - particularly since Deacon's comment "The >
	unpublished evidence makes it highly likely that Molobo ..." was not >
	removed - maybe just ask Mayalld why that was left in there. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

radek szulga wrote:
> The only thing is that the person who removed those comments, Mayalld,
> seems to quite sympathetic to the view that this case was a mess from
> the get go and that all this secret stuff should've never happened.
> Basically I think s/he is just generally annoyed at how this was
> handled and so he's trying to re-focus it. So we don't want to annoy
> him more than the other side.
> But fuss maybe a good idea - particularly since Deacon's comment "The
> unpublished evidence makes it highly likely that Molobo ..." was not
> removed - maybe just ask Mayalld why that was left in there.

Certainly, please do ask Mayalld about this. I'd also repeat our 
questions, as well as your suggestions about possible admin 
shopping/bias in terms who sees the secret evidence/mistrial in a new 
section on article's talk.


-- 
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

