X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat May 30 22:48:06 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A219B5D.7000103@post.pl>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 22:47:25 +0200
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <929ed1ec0905300613u1541c0dal63d2972e3f8a5731@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0905300613u1541c0dal63d2972e3f8a5731@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > Avraham has reclassified Molobo's
	checkuser from "Unlikely" to > "Possible". Other than that, the
	discussion appears to have wound down. > > Considering that it's May
	30th and Molobo hasn't been banned, is he > safe? Or are any actions
	needed to reduce his risk? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Molobo
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > Avraham has reclassified Molobo's
	checkuser from "Unlikely" to > "Possible". Other than that, the
	discussion appears to have wound down. > > Considering that it's May
	30th and Molobo hasn't been banned, is he > safe? Or are any actions
	needed to reduce his risk? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Digwuren wrote:
> Avraham has reclassified Molobo's checkuser from "Unlikely" to 
> "Possible".  Other than that, the discussion appears to have wound down.
> 
> Considering that it's May 30th and Molobo hasn't been banned, is he 
> safe?  Or are any actions needed to reduce his risk?

There are delays, but the "ban Molobo" faction is still doing well. I 
think our best option is to keep insisting that evidence should be made 
public, or at least, available to all admins, since Deacon has it - and 
as a side benefit, keep demanding the answer to why Deacon got it.

Further, I'd like to ask Molobo on the status of his RfC against 
Skapperod; as I said earlier, the sooner it is started, the better.


-- 
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

