X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jun 18 01:08:59 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:08:51 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0906171608p6268055s565f67364def3dd9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Hillock has recently noted an important feature of our
	email list. It produces a lot of emails, and becomes increasingly
	difficult to follow and organize. Just a small advice for those using
	gmail: There is an option "Create a filter" (second line from top;
	alternatively go to "Settings"), but you will have to add the email
	addresses of everyone of us, not just folks@wikipedometer.net (which
	acts only as "send to", not as "from"). The option I chose (what to do
	with these emails) was to create labels and the filters would assign
	labels to different messages, pending from whom you received them. I
	made a blue label "wpm", which allows me very easily to just ignore
	wpm-related emails in my inbox when necessary. I have now 450
	wpm-related conversations, some of them are 1-message conversations, but
	one was a 60-message conversation (!) Also, I have the option of
	reviewing only wpm-labeled conversations. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] do not get lost in messages
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2073611042230713308=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hillock has recently noted an important feature of our
	email list. It produces a lot of emails, and becomes increasingly
	difficult to follow and organize. Just a small advice for those using
	gmail: There is an option "Create a filter" (second line from top;
	alternatively go to "Settings"), but you will have to add the email
	addresses of everyone of us, not just folks@wikipedometer.net (which
	acts only as "send to", not as "from"). The option I chose (what to do
	with these emails) was to create labels and the filters would assign
	labels to different messages, pending from whom you received them. I
	made a blue label "wpm", which allows me very easily to just ignore
	wpm-related emails in my inbox when necessary. I have now 450
	wpm-related conversations, some of them are 1-message conversations, but
	one was a 60-message conversation (!) Also, I have the option of
	reviewing only wpm-labeled conversations. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2073611042230713308==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502b630e3c7a1046c935f76

--00504502b630e3c7a1046c935f76
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hillock has recently noted an important feature of our email list. It
produces a lot of emails, and becomes increasingly difficult to follow and
organize. Just a small advice for those using gmail:
There is an option "Create a filter" (second line from top; alternatively go
to "Settings"), but you will have to add the email addresses of everyone of
us, not just folks@wikipedometer.net (which acts only as "send to", not as
"from"). The option I chose (what to do with these emails) was to create
labels and the filters would assign labels to different messages, pending
from whom you received them. I made a blue label "wpm", which allows me very
easily to just ignore wpm-related emails in my inbox when necessary. I have
now 450 wpm-related conversations, some of them are 1-message conversations,
but one was a 60-message conversation (!) Also, I have the option of
reviewing only wpm-labeled conversations.

183 of 450 conversations I have not bothered even to read yet (!) They
pertain to periods when I was less active. So, in case someone expects from
me an answer or a reaction and does not receive it, there are three
possibilities: 1) I am not even aware I was asked something, 2) I forgot I
was asked something, which for practical purposes is equivalent to 1, or 3)
(which is very rare, 1-2 cases only) I want to write a more thorough answer
and did not get to do that yet. Therefore I apologize to those that expect
(now or will in the future) something from me and don't get an answer, and
kindly ask them to remind me.

Dorin

--00504502b630e3c7a1046c935f76
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: collapse;">Hillo=
ck has recently noted an important feature of our email list. It produces a=
 lot of emails, and becomes increasingly difficult to follow and organize. =
Just a small advice for those using gmail:=A0</span><div>
<span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: collapse;"><br><=
/span></div><div><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse:=
 collapse;">There is an option &quot;Create a filter&quot; (second line fro=
m top; alternatively go to &quot;Settings&quot;), but you will have to add =
the email addresses of everyone of us, not just=A0<span class=3D"Apple-styl=
e-span" style=3D"white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: =
2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; "><a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipe=
dometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a> (which acts only as &quot;send to&=
quot;, not as &quot;from&quot;).=A0The option I chose (what to do with thes=
e emails) was to create labels and the filters would assign labels to diffe=
rent messages, pending from whom you received them. I made a blue label &qu=
ot;wpm&quot;, which allows me very easily to just ignore wpm-related emails=
 in my inbox when necessary. I have now 450 wpm-related conversations, some=
 of them are 1-message conversations, but one was a 60-message conversation=
 (!) Also, I have the option of reviewing only wpm-labeled conversations. <=
/span></span></div>
<div><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: collapse; w=
hite-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-borde=
r-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br></span></div><div><span class=3D"Apple-style-=
span" style=3D"border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-bo=
rder-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">183 of=
 450 conversations I have not bothered even to read yet (!) They pertain to=
 periods when I was less active. So, in case someone expects from me an ans=
wer or a reaction and does not receive it, there are three possibilities: 1=
) I am not even aware I was asked something, 2) I forgot I was asked someth=
ing, which for practical purposes is equivalent to 1, or 3) (which is very =
rare, 1-2 cases only) I want to write a more thorough answer and did not ge=
t to do that yet. Therefore I apologize to those that expect (now or will i=
n the future) something from me and don&#39;t get an answer, and kindly ask=
 them to remind me.  </span></div>
<div><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: collapse; w=
hite-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-borde=
r-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br></span></div><div><span class=3D"Apple-style-=
span" style=3D"border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-bo=
rder-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">Dorin<=
/span></div>

--00504502b630e3c7a1046c935f76--


--===============2073611042230713308==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2073611042230713308==--


