X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 29 20:36:48 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A490A2D.4030705@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:38:37 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <25890ca0906281732s3836a51i757b5568dd328d63@mail.gmail.com>	<4f045a880906281902n56be257ao44cc951550f8b1e9@mail.gmail.com>	<c3b2b3db0906282003j163060b5y8ba6da454b967828@mail.gmail.com>	<c3b2b3db0906282012r23dcb4fcr3982e02029734d66@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0906290536t1e1014c7t5915ae76f3772d56@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906290548w37de1fa2w2e2e0c4fc73e48d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906290548w37de1fa2w2e2e0c4fc73e48d@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Andrei Dombay wrote: > > I would not file an appeal.
	There is a rude anekdot about a little > sparrow who fell down into a
	pile of shit after being frozen during a > harsh winter. The shit was
	warm, so the sparrow felt better and started > singing songs. A cat was
	nearby, he listen the sings, took the sparrow > out of the shit and eat
	him. Three conclusions: (1) someone who places > you into the shit is
	not necessarily your enemy; (2) someone who removes > you from the shit
	is not necessarily your friend; (3) if you are sitting > in a shit, do
	not rise your voice, because a cat might be walking nearby. > > This is
	certainly about me, but might be about others as well. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appeal at AE (was: Let's give Thatcher some
	breathing	space)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Andrei Dombay wrote: > > I would not file an appeal.
	There is a rude anekdot about a little > sparrow who fell down into a
	pile of shit after being frozen during a > harsh winter. The shit was
	warm, so the sparrow felt better and started > singing songs. A cat was
	nearby, he listen the sings, took the sparrow > out of the shit and eat
	him. Three conclusions: (1) someone who places > you into the shit is
	not necessarily your enemy; (2) someone who removes > you from the shit
	is not necessarily your friend; (3) if you are sitting > in a shit, do
	not rise your voice, because a cat might be walking nearby. > > This is
	certainly about me, but might be about others as well. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Andrei Dombay wrote:
> 
> I would not file an appeal. There is a rude anekdot about  a little 
> sparrow who fell down into a pile of shit after being frozen during a 
> harsh winter. The shit was warm, so the sparrow felt better and started 
> singing songs. A cat was nearby, he listen the sings, took the sparrow 
> out of the shit and eat him. Three conclusions: (1) someone who places 
> you into the shit is not necessarily your enemy; (2) someone who removes 
> you from the shit is not necessarily your friend; (3) if you are sitting 
> in a shit, do not rise your voice, because a cat might be walking nearby.
> 
> This is certainly about me, but might be about others as well.

There is certainly no hurry. I'd suggest that Radek may want to contact 
admins I approached who indicated they support shortening the 
restriction / replacing it with voluntary restriction first. You can 
tell them I told you about their interest and you are asking if they had 
the time to talk to Thatcher about you. Those admins are: MBisanz, 
Seddon, TheCavalry and PeterSymonds

You may also contact others. It doesn't matter how many you spam with 
the same message about how Thatcher agreed to review your case if 
neutral admins ask her to :) The more, the merrier, actually :)

Once this goes to AE/ArbCom, there is no going back.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

