X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 24 08:56:46 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906232322j75e49886l9c7e7f39b12c6b97@mail.gmail.com>
References: <be0.5d360a6b.3772dc2e@aol.com>
	<4f045a880906232114w3ff23eecq4003babb5cfb380e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A41BFE1.1040300@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906232322j75e49886l9c7e7f39b12c6b97@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:56:31 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906232356n35f5c1bdrde771cc61c3a4a5c@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Crap. I'm super busy today and will be gone all day
	and
	I can't pursue it. Can someone at least initiate the disucssion with
	Shelly or Thathcher? Radek 2009/6/24 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>: >
	On
	Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:55, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: >>
	>> Radek should question this restriction on him, it is quite unfair. He
	is >> not mentioned at all in Shelly's report (it may be a good idea to
	write >> to her and ask for help against Tatcher going too far).
	Tatcher
	cites >> "Nashi (youth movement)" where Radek has reverted 3 times over
	the >> period of 2 weeks, once with an edit summary, twice without.
	Hardly a >> case of edit warring justifying half a year of 1RR
	restriction. > > I suspect Thatcher's goal here is to "root down that
	evil cabal", not > restrain edit warring. I seem to recall he explained
	lengthily somewhere > that AE is *supposed* to be a hatchet and not a
	scalpel, and he has also > claimed that his 1RRW doesn't really restrict
	anybody. > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list
	> folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Hello, Martin
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Crap. I'm super busy today and will be gone all day and
	I can't pursue it. Can someone at least initiate the disucssion with
	Shelly or Thathcher? Radek 2009/6/24 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>: > On
	Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:55, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: >>
	>> Radek should question this restriction on him, it is quite unfair. He
	is >> not mentioned at all in Shelly's report (it may be a good idea to
	write >> to her and ask for help against Tatcher going too far). Tatcher
	cites >> "Nashi (youth movement)" where Radek has reverted 3 times over
	the >> period of 2 weeks, once with an edit summary, twice without.
	Hardly a >> case of edit warring justifying half a year of 1RR
	restriction. > > I suspect Thatcher's goal here is to "root down that
	evil cabal", not > restrain edit warring. I seem to recall he explained
	lengthily somewhere > that AE is *supposed* to be a hatchet and not a
	scalpel, and he has also > claimed that his 1RRW doesn't really restrict
	anybody. > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list
	> folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Crap. I'm super busy today and will be gone all day and I can't pursue
it. Can someone at least initiate the disucssion with Shelly or
Thathcher?

Radek


2009/6/24 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:55, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>>
>> Radek should question this restriction on him, it is quite unfair. He is
>> not mentioned at all in Shelly's report (it may be a good idea to write
>> to her and ask for help against Tatcher going too far). Tatcher cites
>> "Nashi (youth movement)" where Radek has reverted 3 times over the
>> period of 2 weeks, once with an edit summary, twice without. Hardly a
>> case of edit warring justifying half a year of 1RR restriction.
>
> I suspect Thatcher's goal here is to "root down that evil cabal", not
> restrain edit warring. =A0I seem to recall he explained lengthily somewhe=
re
> that AE is *supposed* to be a hatchet and not a scalpel, and he has also
> claimed that his 1RRW doesn't really restrict anybody.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

