X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:01:08 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906211358w1eb0730dm77226d89a49f0d58@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0906211358w1eb0730dm77226d89a49f0d58@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:00:50 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211400v198e9443nc9ad234ff6b1cbc5@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: This just seems like a crazy grab for authority that
	he
	doesn't have. Why can he ban you from AE and you not him? At first I
	thought he was a member of ArbCom or something but apparently this is
	all his initiative. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  This just seems like a crazy grab for authority that he
	doesn't have. Why can he ban you from AE and you not him? At first I
	thought he was a member of ArbCom or something but apparently this is
	all his initiative. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

This just seems like a crazy grab for authority that he doesn't have.
Why can he ban you from AE and you not him? At first I thought he was
a member of ArbCom or something but apparently this is all his
initiative.

Radek

2009/6/21 Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>:
> Wow!=A0 I do not know if you noticed this:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Request=
s/Enforcement&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D297558407
>
> He also moved your comment at AE page from "uninvolved admins comments"
> section.
>
> Technically, you should probably first ask some explanation with diffs fr=
om
> Jechochman at his talk page, although I am not strong in wikipolitics.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I surprised:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3APiotrus&diff=3D2=
97788006&oldid=3D297787433
>> I tried talking to him nicely on AE/talk pages, but he replies with
>> this. Should I go to AN, ANI or some ArbCom page to deal with this? Best
>> argument so far is that nobody else criticized my posts and he didn't
>> even cite diffs to what exactly in my posts was unhelpful/inflammatory.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Piotr Konieczny
>>
>> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
>> theory."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

