X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jul 26 23:13:42 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0907260201o6b7c726o60e7787655455720@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f826636f0907251156x6a440551v26bbe8d50743dcbc@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0907251240j4f84a928n672bb1ce8d2c4d8f@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0907251522i4daf8b6are8f1fe105c844e0c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0907260201o6b7c726o60e7787655455720@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:13:31 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0907261413r30f8f4wf1dcd336d1d709ea@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I have never seen a 1 second block before. :) But Gwen
	Gale's indef block is still on Martin's record, albeit undone after 56
	minutes. Is there anything to do about it? Can it be deleted from the
	record, given the fact that 2 blocks were applied for the same thing.
	Obviously, Martin should say "Although I did not break anything
	formally, my behavior was not helpful, and I have made myself a point to
	not take such approach again." [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] mistake
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I have never seen a 1 second block before. :) But Gwen
	Gale's indef block is still on Martin's record, albeit undone after 56
	minutes. Is there anything to do about it? Can it be deleted from the
	record, given the fact that 2 blocks were applied for the same thing.
	Obviously, Martin should say "Although I did not break anything
	formally, my behavior was not helpful, and I have made myself a point to
	not take such approach again." [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I have never seen a 1 second block before. :)

But Gwen Gale's indef block is still on Martin's record, albeit undone
after 56 minutes. Is there anything to do about it? Can it be deleted
from the record, given the fact that 2 blocks were applied for the
same thing. Obviously, Martin should say "Although I did not break
anything formally, my behavior was not helpful, and I have made myself
a point to not take such approach again."

We should ask very nicely Piotr to look into what was on Mythdon's
deleted userpage. Tell us at least something, spice up our discussion.
:)

Theresa Knott and Gwen Gale must be given the info about outing
Biophys. At the appropriate time, when we start an RfC, we should
invite them.

2009/7/26 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 01:22, Sander S=E4de <sander.sade@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>>
>> Seems we got lucky -
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Inc=
idents#Proposed_community_ban:_Martintg
>> - Will Beback is highly regarded admin and he coming to Martintg's help
>> almost certainly means nothing further will happen.
>
> By the way, who is Mythdon?
> Surely the fact that his userpage has been repeatedly deleted is just a
> coincidence ...
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

