X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 22 09:51:10 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906220048o1bd16f26s683aa972f64c1c59@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211428y5ea28c88wafdde68863c6a2bd@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211430n74ede828t87898697dbadcaa0@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211432i395bb0d1v4ace9d2f4da52cc4@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211438u405219b9se5a775761f8b8a7e@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211441w1782cb63x753f942d98d167bb@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211507t40b06546n96fa2e485f48ec5@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211511v542ad8dj252f7043e6eb1bb8@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211522t16b93620r8ff75fc90b7ac43@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906220048o1bd16f26s683aa972f64c1c59@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:50:52 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906220050t175a95abx8e49f633eb6949b@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I posted a notice on AGK's making him aware of the
	comment at NYB's. Radek 2009/6/22 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>: > On
	Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:22, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>
	This seems to fit Newyorkbrad just fine. He's active, too. > > I have
	messed up the days. Newyorkbrad wasn't active, and still isn't. :-( > In
	order to speed up arbitrative interest, do we need to contact anybody >
	else from arbcom? > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia statistics
	discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I posted a notice on AGK's making him aware of the
	comment at NYB's. Radek 2009/6/22 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>: > On
	Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:22, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>
	This seems to fit Newyorkbrad just fine. He's active, too. > > I have
	messed up the days. Newyorkbrad wasn't active, and still isn't. :-( > In
	order to speed up arbitrative interest, do we need to contact anybody >
	else from arbcom? > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia statistics
	discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I posted a notice on AGK's making him aware of the comment at NYB's.

Radek


2009/6/22 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:22, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This seems to fit Newyorkbrad just fine. =A0He's active, too.
>
> I have messed up the days. =A0Newyorkbrad wasn't active, and still isn't.=
 :-(
> In order to speed up arbitrative interest, do we need to contact anybody
> else from arbcom?
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

