X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Apr  3 15:03:45 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880904030315u745efe0eyba8a71f652dc5481@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0904021519y23c5e37bm2dd7bd3e71b2aea6@mail.gmail.com>
	<49D53E8B.6090902@post.pl>
	<4f045a880904021614y5e0f78bcn4ae396902de2e37d@mail.gmail.com>
	<49D5510F.2040405@post.pl>
	<4f045a880904021713v13da21e0h44055f5fb1b46f6d@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880904030315u745efe0eyba8a71f652dc5481@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:03:32 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0904030603v46797bf8x382795167fd9b01e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I am sorry for the whole event. In fact, I only
	commented on your talk page later, after William unblocked you, in an
	attempt to do something to clear your record. I was trying to bring his
	attention to look over more carefully, hoping that he wouldn't like to
	know he was used as a tool to throw mud at you. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] WMConnolly blocked Martin
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5101692226874105354=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.6
X-Spam_score_int: 16
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I am sorry for the whole event. In fact, I only
	commented on your talk page later, after William unblocked you, in an
	attempt to do something to clear your record. I was trying to bring his
	attention to look over more carefully, hoping that he wouldn't like to
	know he was used as a tool to throw mud at you. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.5000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5101692226874105354==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502c89e026cdc0466a62de8

--00504502c89e026cdc0466a62de8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I am sorry for the whole event. In fact, I only commented on your talk page
later, after William unblocked you, in an attempt to do something to clear
your record. I was trying to bring his attention to look over more
carefully, hoping that he wouldn't like to know he was used as a tool to
throw mud at you.

I don't know what would be the best next strategy. If none of you had any
unpleasant experience with William, then I would suggest we all try to talk
him nicely into looking at the articles, and we should all behave very nice
when editting there, but a little bit provocative, only enough that
Offliner, Russavia, the anon (possibly Baeckman) and/or PetriKrohn react in
a bad behaved fashion.

When this happens, Martin can step up and say to William: there are two ways
to respond to such edits: 1) give up editting the article and let it be owed
by the offender, or 2) revert with the risk of getting 3RR reported and mud
stuck at you. And then we all can step up and say that it is abnormal to be
put in front of such an alternative, and that William should do something to
avoid in the future such dilema-situations.
If this is too complicate, then at least I could help do some reverts/edits
in these articles at times. Now that I have been involved a little bit, it
won't look strange if I get more interested in the future.

Dorin
2009/4/3 Martin <martint20@gmail.com>

> I've just been unblocked early.
>
> Thanks to Piotr, Biruitorul and Dorin for your comments on my talk
> page, it evidently convinced William to lift my block.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--00504502c89e026cdc0466a62de8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>I am sorry for the whole event. In fact, I only commented on your talk=
 page later, after William unblocked you, in an attempt to do something to =
clear your record. I was trying to bring his attention to look over more ca=
refully, hoping that he wouldn&#39;t like to know he was used as a tool to =
throw mud at you. </div>

<div>=A0</div>
<div>I don&#39;t know what would be the best next strategy. If none of you =
had any unpleasant experience with William, then I would suggest we all try=
 to talk him nicely into looking at the articles, and we should all behave =
very nice when editting there, but a little bit provocative, only enough th=
at Offliner, Russavia, the anon=A0(possibly Baeckman)=A0and/or PetriKrohn r=
eact in a bad behaved fashion. </div>

<div>=A0</div>
<div>When this happens, Martin can step up and say to William: there are tw=
o ways to respond to such edits: 1) give up editting the article and let it=
 be owed by the offender, or 2) revert with the risk of getting 3RR reporte=
d and mud stuck at you. And then we all can step up and say that it is abno=
rmal to be put in front of such an alternative, and that William should do =
something to avoid in the future such dilema-situations.<br>
</div>
<div>If this is too complicate, then at least I could help do some reverts/=
edits in these articles at times. Now that I have been involved a little bi=
t, it won&#39;t look strange if I get more interested in the future.</div>

<div>=A0</div>
<div>Dorin<br></div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/4/3 Martin <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D=
"mailto:martint20@gmail.com">martint20@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">I&#39;ve just been unblocked ear=
ly.<br><br>Thanks to Piotr, Biruitorul and Dorin for your comments on my ta=
lk<br>
page, it evidently convinced William to lift my block.<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class=3D"h5"><br>Cheers,<br>Martin<br><br>____________________________=
___________________<br>Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br><a href=3D"m=
ailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br><a href=3D"ht=
tp://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=3D"_blank">ht=
tp://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--00504502c89e026cdc0466a62de8--


--===============5101692226874105354==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5101692226874105354==--


