X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 30 02:07:47 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A4953A5.1090708@post.pl>
References: <494251.20348.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0906291324m488bdf60l2e64cbb8faae4b41@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4953A5.1090708@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:07:39 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0906291707l6e35027ax30a6c4e904049b6b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  That was an interesting girl who edited a lot:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:WillowW&oldid=189716850
	On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Women and Wiklp
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7050743999865662114=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  That was an interesting girl who edited a lot:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:WillowW&oldid=189716850
	On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7050743999865662114==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dbe59a3ed432046d859851

--0016e6dbe59a3ed432046d859851
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That was an interesting girl who edited a lot:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser:WillowW&oldid=3D189716850


On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> Digwuren wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 21:18, Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.co=
m
> > <mailto:christiansuciu@yahoo.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Regardless, I think it's a good thing /some/ kinds of women aren't
> >     there in greater numbers. Let me explain. You've probably heard of
> >     [[User:Bishonen]]. So, on May 21, she referred to
>
> I have no great love for Bish (I didn't even know she was a she...) but
> I don't think that gender influences troll-like qualities.
>
> > Actually, there's another possible explanation.
> >
> > Traditionally, most people on the Internet have been male, and after th=
e
> > Eternal September, most of the male ones have been sexually frustrated.
>
> Ummm, why?
>
> > This has led to development of a certain kind of, shall we say, "online
> > gender r=F4les".  While the exact behaviour patterns vary from society =
to
> > society, they may be rather discriminatory, and I know several people
> > who are female in real life but as a matter of habit use male personas
> > online so as to ward off unwarranted attention.  One of them makes an
> > exception for a certain well-known Estonian dating site; the other ones
> > don't use well-known dating sites as far as I know.  The fact that they
> > happen to be in stable relations may factor into it.
>
> An interesting observation: there is one place online where women seem
> to be at least as popular as men: Facebook. A sign of a change (finally)
> coming?
>
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--0016e6dbe59a3ed432046d859851
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That was an interesting girl who edited a lot:<br><br><a href=3D"http://en.=
wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser:WillowW&amp;oldid=3D189716850">http:=
//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser:WillowW&amp;oldid=3D189716850</=
a><br><br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Piotr Konie=
czny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote =
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); m=
argin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">Digwuren wrote:<br>
&gt; On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 21:18, Christian Suciu &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:c=
hristiansuciu@yahoo.com">christiansuciu@yahoo.com</a><br>
</div><div class=3D"im">&gt; &lt;mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:christiansuciu@ya=
hoo.com">christiansuciu@yahoo.com</a>&gt;&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; =A0 =A0 Regardless, I think it&#39;s a good thing /some/ kinds of wome=
n aren&#39;t<br>
&gt; =A0 =A0 there in greater numbers. Let me explain. You&#39;ve probably =
heard of<br>
&gt; =A0 =A0 [[User:Bishonen]]. So, on May 21, she referred to<br>
<br>
</div>I have no great love for Bish (I didn&#39;t even know she was a she..=
.) but<br>
I don&#39;t think that gender influences troll-like qualities.<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>
&gt; Actually, there&#39;s another possible explanation.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Traditionally, most people on the Internet have been male, and after t=
he<br>
&gt; Eternal September, most of the male ones have been sexually frustrated=
.<br>
<br>
</div>Ummm, why?<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>
&gt; This has led to development of a certain kind of, shall we say, &quot;=
online<br>
&gt; gender r=F4les&quot;. =A0While the exact behaviour patterns vary from =
society to<br>
&gt; society, they may be rather discriminatory, and I know several people<=
br>
&gt; who are female in real life but as a matter of habit use male personas=
<br>
&gt; online so as to ward off unwarranted attention. =A0One of them makes a=
n<br>
&gt; exception for a certain well-known Estonian dating site; the other one=
s<br>
&gt; don&#39;t use well-known dating sites as far as I know. =A0The fact th=
at they<br>
&gt; happen to be in stable relations may factor into it.<br>
<br>
</div>An interesting observation: there is one place online where women see=
m<br>
to be at least as popular as men: Facebook. A sign of a change (finally)<br=
>
coming?<br>
<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br>
--<br>
Piotr Konieczny<br>
<br>
&quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=
<br>
theory.&quot;<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e6dbe59a3ed432046d859851--


--===============7050743999865662114==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7050743999865662114==--


