X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Sep 13 20:30:46 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bde.5270b3a2.37de9273@aol.com>
References: <bde.5270b3a2.37de9273@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:30:44 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0909131130r32f93dc2n912ae51a17a1357a@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Heh, that's pretty much what I just did. Weird. Radek
	2009/9/13 <PetersJV@aol.com> [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] [WMP] Please comment on the move of a Polish king
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3547475667667226131=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Heh, that's pretty much what I just did. Weird. Radek
	2009/9/13 <PetersJV@aol.com> [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3547475667667226131==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555a0b24fc0aa047379bfdb

--00032555a0b24fc0aa047379bfdb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Heh, that's pretty much what I just did. Weird.

Radek

2009/9/13 <PetersJV@aol.com>

>  In a message dated 9/13/2009 1:54:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> piokon@post.pl writes:
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Micha%C5%82_Korybut_Wi%C5%9Bniowiecki#New_naming_discussion
>
>  While Davies uses the "proper" name published over 20 years ago, that
> does appear to be limited to predominantly Polish sources. "Michael" is in a
> minority, "Micheal" appears to be the majority, and "Michal" (no diacritic)
> is also quite popular--that might work, then using the approach that adding
> the diacritic does not make it any less intelligible (and use Davies as an
> example, perhaps)... can't really comment on the article since it's not my
> "area of interest"
>
> /Peters
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--00032555a0b24fc0aa047379bfdb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Heh, that&#39;s pretty much what I just did. Weird.<br><br>Radek<br><br><di=
v class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/9/13  <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:=
PetersJV@aol.com">PetersJV@aol.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"g=
mail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt=
 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">




<div style=3D"font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;"><f=
ont size=3D"2" color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial"><div class=3D"im">
<div>
<div>In a message dated 9/13/2009 1:54:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,=20
piokon@post.pl writes:</div>
<blockquote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid blue; padding-left: 5px; margin=
-left: 5px;"><font style=3D"background-color: transparent;" size=3D"2" colo=
r=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial"><a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:M=
icha%C5%82_Korybut_Wi%C5%9Bniowiecki#New_naming_discussion" target=3D"_blan=
k">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Micha%C5%82_Korybut_Wi%C5%9Bniowiecki#=
New_naming_discussion</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div>
<div></div>
</div><div>While Davies uses the &quot;proper&quot; name published over 20 =
years ago, that does=20
appear to be limited to predominantly Polish sources. &quot;Michael&quot; i=
s in a=20
minority, &quot;Micheal&quot; appears to be the majority, and &quot;Michal&=
quot; (no diacritic) is=20
also quite popular--that might work, then using the approach that adding th=
e=20
diacritic does not make it any less intelligible (and use Davies as an exam=
ple,=20
perhaps)... can&#39;t really comment on the article since it&#39;s not my &=
quot;area of=20
interest&quot;</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>/Peters</div></font></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--00032555a0b24fc0aa047379bfdb--


--===============3547475667667226131==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3547475667667226131==--


