X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 22:14:33 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A3E8803.1070706@post.pl>
References: <ca3.534dabe2.376d98de@aol.com>
	<4f045a880906191952h2c73b422w3e746cce1bf2ed5f@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880906191958u733dd063if7cd1f77d349e7be@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3E5CD3.6030301@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906211153w307205ceyb364d7ebcf5c45aa@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3E8803.1070706@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:14:11 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211314n75a00c19i41376ef879f921f5@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  > Most of that I'd classify as tactics, too. Logistics,
	for me, is stuff > like this list (an expanding it), getting our own
	MediaWiki set up (on > which we could design ready-to-be pasted Rf...s),
	learning how to use > IMs for insta-speed reverts and alerts, and stuff
	like that. > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Strategy (was It isn't over)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  > Most of that I'd classify as tactics, too. Logistics,
	for me, is stuff > like this list (an expanding it), getting our own
	MediaWiki set up (on > which we could design ready-to-be pasted Rf...s),
	learning how to use > IMs for insta-speed reverts and alerts, and stuff
	like that. > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

> Most of that I'd classify as tactics, too. Logistics, for me, is stuff
> like this list (an expanding it), getting our own MediaWiki set up (on
> which we could design ready-to-be pasted Rf...s), learning how to use
> IMs for insta-speed reverts and alerts, and stuff like that.
>

You're probably right on this. Maybe the tactics part should be
separated into content-related and case-related (AE, ANI, etc.). The
logistics stuff you mention above is pretty undeveloped. Good part of
the reason is that it just sounds like a lot of work and learning, and
a lot of us are pressed for time. I sort of don't even have a good
idea of what a MediaWiki is much less how to set up one. Similarly for
the other stuff. Some of this some of you are just going to have to
walk some of us through.

Radek

> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

