X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul  3 18:43:21 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0907030811k715772c9w377f24a20922f172@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0906281732s3836a51i757b5568dd328d63@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906300826w3d2e7055k36965f3a3ed4729e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4A8840.8040803@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906301452q70e09962v271a9b21198f06ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906301558l3dd6f4b9p3f901958325e637a@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906301642qa1b9a47ncd8a4c76dfb74e1a@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4AC42E.9080204@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0906301929o30d77c9bi2b9114bf6be20c3c@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907011244l6efbb29wf0ea850c623211cf@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907030811k715772c9w377f24a20922f172@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:43:06 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0907030943k4a94cc65l2752c9ef8be46a84@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Nothing in Digwuren case, as far as I know. Piotrus
	tried to bring the tag-teaming argument in his case, but Arbcom did not
	support this, and maybe for good. Radek, I think you and Piotr are much
	better equipped than me to prepare the request for clarification if you
	think this is needed (I only provided some thoughts above). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appeal at AE (was: Let's give Thatcher some breathing
	space)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3091507280590430587=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Nothing in Digwuren case, as far as I know. Piotrus
	tried to bring the tag-teaming argument in his case, but Arbcom did not
	support this, and maybe for good. Radek, I think you and Piotr are much
	better equipped than me to prepare the request for clarification if you
	think this is needed (I only provided some thoughts above). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3091507280590430587==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b470c53413046dcfd9b9

--001636c5b470c53413046dcfd9b9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Nothing in Digwuren case, as far as I know. Piotrus tried to bring the
tag-teaming argument in his case, but Arbcom did not support this, and maybe
for good.

Radek, I think you and Piotr are much better equipped than me to prepare the
request for clarification if you think this is needed (I only provided some
thoughts above).



On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:11 AM, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

> "Tag-teams mentioned by T in his official 1RR restriction message. Should
> the idea of collective responsibility ever be used by administrators?
> (several users treayed as one, as Deacon said). The tag-team is a
> controversial concept, which was not supported by ArbCom in the last EE
> case. A group of editors may indeed revert someone who fights against
> consensus. A tag-team?"
>
> Here I guess you're referring to the Piotrus case. Is there anything
> similar in the Digwuren case?
>
> Radek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--001636c5b470c53413046dcfd9b9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Nothing in Digwuren case, as far as I know. Piotrus tried to bring the tag-=
teaming argument in his case, but Arbcom did not support this, and maybe fo=
r good.<br><br>Radek, I think you and Piotr are much better equipped than m=
e to prepare the request for clarification if you think this is needed (I o=
nly provided some thoughts above).<br>
<br>=A0<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:11 AM, =
radek szulga <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rs=
szulga@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"=
 style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.=
8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">&quot;Tag-teams mentioned by T in his official 1RR restri=
ction message.
Should the idea of collective responsibility ever be used by
administrators? (several users treayed as one, as Deacon said). The
tag-team is a controversial concept, which was not supported by ArbCom
in the last EE case. A group of editors may indeed revert someone who
fights against=A0 consensus. A tag-team?&quot;<br><br></div>Here I guess yo=
u&#39;re referring to the Piotrus case. Is there anything similar in the Di=
gwuren case?<br><font color=3D"#888888"><br>Radek<br><br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--001636c5b470c53413046dcfd9b9--


--===============3091507280590430587==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3091507280590430587==--


