X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  9 01:59:16 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A2D862A.2090206@post.pl>
References: <830063.89149.qm@web32802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0906081352i665fc1b2y2e9a3f889621cda5@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2D862A.2090206@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:59:07 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0906081659t5f5043f7u738acfda49376df@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  > > > While I've had good experience with Hillock, I
	also vaguely recall he > has reached some accommodation with Irpen.
	Which doesn't have to be > anything bad... but I'd start by sounding
	out
	Ostap R. > > Bah, I've mistaken the nick, I wasn't thinking about
	Hillock - but is he > still reading the list? > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] More cabal theory
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3800981335976999222=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  > > > While I've had good experience with Hillock, I
	also vaguely recall he > has reached some accommodation with Irpen.
	Which doesn't have to be > anything bad... but I'd start by sounding out
	Ostap R. > > Bah, I've mistaken the nick, I wasn't thinking about
	Hillock - but is he > still reading the list? > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3800981335976999222==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b9922100654046bdf070b

--0016363b9922100654046bdf070b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>
>
> While I've had good experience with Hillock, I also vaguely recall he
> has reached some accommodation with Irpen. Which doesn't have to be
> anything bad... but I'd start by sounding out Ostap R.
>
> Bah, I've mistaken the nick, I wasn't thinking about Hillock - but is he
> still reading the list?
>

I am sorry, I am afraid I don't follow you. Just to clarify, I don't
understand:
1) what kind of accommodation between Hillock and Irpen?
2) "sounding out" OstapR ? means you don't want him (ever/yet) [which is
absolutely ok if you have a good reason, even if you don't want to share
that reason with us] or means smth else?
3) which nick have you mistaken: Hillock, Hillock65, Ostap, OstapR ? :)
answer only as many questions that straighten things out, not necessarily
all 3. :)

ps i was referring to Hillock's contributions on WP. I believe here he just
said "hi".

--0016363b9922100654046bdf070b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"m=
argin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class=
=3D"im"><br>
<br>
</div>While I&#39;ve had good experience with Hillock, I also vaguely recal=
l he<br>
has reached some accommodation with Irpen. Which doesn&#39;t have to be<br>
anything bad... but I&#39;d start by sounding out Ostap R.<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>
<span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: collapse; ">Bah,=
 I&#39;ve mistaken the nick, I wasn&#39;t thinking about Hillock - but is h=
e<br>still reading the list?=A0</span></div></blockquote><div>=A0</div><div=
>I am sorry, I am afraid I don&#39;t follow you. Just to clarify, I don&#39=
;t understand:</div>
<div>1) what kind of accommodation between Hillock and Irpen?</div><div>2) =
&quot;sounding out&quot; OstapR ? means you don&#39;t want him (ever/yet) [=
which is absolutely ok if you have a good reason, even if you don&#39;t wan=
t to share that reason with us] or means smth else?</div>
<div>3) which nick have you mistaken: Hillock, Hillock65, Ostap, OstapR ? :=
)<br></div><div>answer only as many questions that straighten things out, n=
ot necessarily all 3. :)</div><div><br></div><div>ps i was referring to Hil=
lock&#39;s contributions on WP. I believe here he just said &quot;hi&quot;.=
</div>
</div>

--0016363b9922100654046bdf070b--


--===============3800981335976999222==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3800981335976999222==--


