X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 22 09:50:59 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880906212008y451e7bd5nec82b3ad8db84c96@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880906212008y451e7bd5nec82b3ad8db84c96@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:50:43 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906220050o9d6b693pf04636da40fbb5cf@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:08, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > Jimbo is no help unless it gets to
	ArbCom. He doesn't need to be. But his talkpage serves as a kind of
	noticeboard for administrators who prefer the royal court to more
	recent
	inventions. These are the power-hungry individuals who are most likely
	to take concern with Jehochman's power-grab. (Incidentally, this is why
	Irpen frequented Jimbo's talkpage.) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3429278299859942224=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:08, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > Jimbo is no help unless it gets to
	ArbCom. He doesn't need to be. But his talkpage serves as a kind of
	noticeboard for administrators who prefer the royal court to more recent
	inventions. These are the power-hungry individuals who are most likely
	to take concern with Jehochman's power-grab. (Incidentally, this is why
	Irpen frequented Jimbo's talkpage.) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3429278299859942224==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a2b393b6f8046ceb21da

--001636c5a2b393b6f8046ceb21da
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:08, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:

> Jimbo is no help unless it gets to ArbCom.


He doesn't need to be.  But his talkpage serves as a kind of noticeboard for
administrators who prefer the royal court to more recent inventions.  These
are the power-hungry individuals who are most likely to take concern with
Jehochman's power-grab.  (Incidentally, this is why Irpen frequented Jimbo's
talkpage.)

Would it be worth supporting acceptance of the case to review Jehochman's
> conduct? I've alrady written some stuff on the request page, but can
> withdraw if it is not the right way to go.


Probably not.  It would be seen as a standard arbcom stalling tactic.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5a2b393b6f8046ceb21da
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:08, Martin <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:martint20@gmail.com">martint20@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Jimbo is no help unless it gets to ArbCom.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>=
He doesn&#39;t need to be. =C2=A0But his talkpage serves as a kind of notic=
eboard for administrators who prefer the royal court to more recent inventi=
ons. =C2=A0These are the power-hungry individuals who are most likely to ta=
ke concern with Jehochman&#39;s power-grab. =C2=A0(Incidentally, this is wh=
y Irpen frequented Jimbo&#39;s talkpage.)</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Would it be worth supporting=
 acceptance of the case to review Jehochman&#39;s conduct? I&#39;ve alrady =
written some stuff on the request page, but can withdraw if it is not the r=
ight way to go.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Probably not. =C2=A0It would be seen as a standard arbc=
om stalling tactic.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5a2b393b6f8046ceb21da--


--===============3429278299859942224==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3429278299859942224==--


