X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Apr  2 09:53:58 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:53:17 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0904020053nad5bd7ate947c9b5b2e1639@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi, Offliner has reported Martintg and Colchicum to
	WP:EW/N. The reports are spurious, but may be misinterpreted -- which, 
	in turn, leads to risk of blocks. Could we create some discussion on <
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring>?
	Experience has shown that most administrators are afraid of issuing
	blocks where they perceive controversy, so a strong show of questionable
	issues in such matters is an important risk mitigation tool. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] WP:EW/N
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7655074952380482862=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.1
X-Spam_score_int: 21
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi, Offliner has reported Martintg and Colchicum to
	WP:EW/N. The reports are spurious, but may be misinterpreted -- which,
	in turn, leads to risk of blocks. Could we create some discussion on <
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring>?
	Experience has shown that most administrators are afraid of issuing
	blocks where they perceive controversy, so a strong show of questionable
	issues in such matters is an important risk mitigation tool. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.0 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS          Subject is all capitals
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.5000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7655074952380482862==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7c148a3a0c304668db94c

--001485f7c148a3a0c304668db94c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,
Offliner has reported Martintg and Colchicum to WP:EW/N.  The reports are
spurious, but may be misinterpreted -- which, in turn, leads to risk of
blocks.  Could we create some discussion on <
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring>?
 Experience has shown that most administrators are afraid of issuing blocks
where they perceive controversy, so a strong show of questionable issues in
such matters is an important risk mitigation tool.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001485f7c148a3a0c304668db94c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,<div><br></div><div>Offliner has reported Martintg and Colchicum to WP:E=
W/N. =C2=A0The reports are spurious, but may be misinterpreted -- which, in=
 turn, leads to risk of blocks. =C2=A0Could we create some discussion on &l=
t;<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_notic=
eboard/Edit_warring">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%=
27_noticeboard/Edit_warring</a>&gt;? =C2=A0Experience has shown that most a=
dministrators are afraid of issuing blocks where they perceive controversy,=
 so a strong show of questionable issues in such matters is an important ri=
sk mitigation tool.<br clear=3D"all">
<br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
</div>

--001485f7c148a3a0c304668db94c--


--===============7655074952380482862==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7655074952380482862==--


