X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  8 21:44:23 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A2D6A01.3000304@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:44:01 +0200
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <712752.31603.qm@web32801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	<4A2CD3DA.7040600@post.pl>
	<4A2CF3C9.5020000@post.pl>	<25890ca0906080639m3f92899cm2594467864e9b455@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906081139p12899778l648e58ab39b1f247@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0906081139p12899778l648e58ab39b1f247@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Update: Deacon has reversed his actions. It remains to
	be seen if he can convince some buddy of his to reapply them, which
	seems like the best countertactic here. If this happens, let's remember
	that rollback is not that important and Jacurek can ask for it in a
	short while, but unless somebody can present evidence that he is
	creating battlegrounds, he shouldn't be added to the Dig's list. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking on Deacon)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Update: Deacon has reversed his actions. It remains to
	be seen if he can convince some buddy of his to reapply them, which
	seems like the best countertactic here. If this happens, let's remember
	that rollback is not that important and Jacurek can ask for it in a
	short while, but unless somebody can present evidence that he is
	creating battlegrounds, he shouldn't be added to the Dig's list. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Update: Deacon has reversed his actions. It remains to be seen if he can 
convince some buddy of his to reapply them, which seems like the best 
countertactic here. If this happens, let's remember that rollback is not 
that important and Jacurek can ask for it in a short while, but unless 
somebody can present evidence that he is creating battlegrounds, he 
shouldn't be added to the Dig's list.

On the other hand, the thread is now in danger of being closed before 
Deacon is punished. Comments that he abused the tools and acted in bad 
faith towards Polish editors would be helpful; also consider sending 
well-thought emails to AGK (but note he is not above revealing the fact 
that he received emails on wiki).


-- 
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

