X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jul  5 12:17:28 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f826636f0907041459i2c47ed40pd7714a2c38f773ae@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A4FBA38.10401@post.pl>
	<f826636f0907041459i2c47ed40pd7714a2c38f773ae@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:17:12 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0907050317n18df24d8y23e4688ed617a66f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 00:59, Dorin Cheptea
	<dorin.cheptea@gmail.com> wrote: > Please, notice that Thatcher has just
	posted on Radeksz' appeal. > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=300300352&oldid=300295478
	> He claims Radek "is no stranger to the EE controversy", and implies he
	> should have known better than to revert without comment on the talk
	page. > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appealing Molobo's block to ArbCom
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4862907677028225071=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 00:59, Dorin Cheptea
	<dorin.cheptea@gmail.com> wrote: > Please, notice that Thatcher has just
	posted on Radeksz' appeal. > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=300300352&oldid=300295478
	> He claims Radek "is no stranger to the EE controversy", and implies he
	> should have known better than to revert without comment on the talk
	page. > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4862907677028225071==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de17626a7cab046df2b1d1

--0016e6de17626a7cab046df2b1d1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 00:59, Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please, notice that Thatcher has just posted on Radeksz' appeal.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=300300352&oldid=300295478
> He claims Radek "is no stranger to the EE controversy", and implies he
> should have known better than to revert without comment on the talk page.
>

It reinforces my preconceived notion that Thatcher is suffering from the
preconceived notion that there's an "EE cabal" which needs to be "rounded
up".  He's brushing Radek with "no stranger to controversy" because his
pattern-seeking mammalian brain has drawn a (not entirely invalid)
connection between Radek and the "EE cabal", and he really doesn't care if
Radek *individually* merits sanctioning.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6de17626a7cab046df2b1d1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 00:59, Dorin Cheptea <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:dorin.cheptea@gmail.com">dorin.cheptea@=
gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div>Please, notice that Thatcher has just posted on Radeksz&#39; appe=
al.=C2=A0</div><div><a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3D=
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&amp;curid=3D12936136&amp;diff=3D=
300300352&amp;oldid=3D300295478" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/=
w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&amp;curid=3D=
12936136&amp;diff=3D300300352&amp;oldid=3D300295478</a></div>

<div>He claims Radek &quot;is no stranger to the EE controversy&quot;, and =
implies he should have known better than to revert without comment on the t=
alk page.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It reinforces my prec=
onceived notion that Thatcher is suffering from the preconceived notion tha=
t there&#39;s an &quot;EE cabal&quot; which needs to be &quot;rounded up&qu=
ot;. =C2=A0He&#39;s brushing Radek with &quot;no stranger to controversy&qu=
ot; because his pattern-seeking mammalian brain has drawn a (not entirely i=
nvalid) connection between Radek and the &quot;EE cabal&quot;, and he reall=
y doesn&#39;t care if Radek *individually* merits sanctioning.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e6de17626a7cab046df2b1d1--


--===============4862907677028225071==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4862907677028225071==--


