X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Aug  3 04:10:24 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A76472C.2040505@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 22:10:52 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Is mostly peaceful, but there is a recent discussion
	between me and Renata, with Dr Dan doing his usual trolling. Perhaps
	some interested editors could weight in, as I think that Renata, who is
	usually quite reasonable, is being rather stubborn and not-neutral here,
	trying to weasel out of a fact that there are no reliable sources
	supporting her Lithuanian POV; her latest solution was to remove the
	disputed para if she cannot make it weaseled :( [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM]  The Polish-Lithuanian front
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Is mostly peaceful, but there is a recent discussion
	between me and Renata, with Dr Dan doing his usual trolling. Perhaps
	some interested editors could weight in, as I think that Renata, who is
	usually quite reasonable, is being rather stubborn and not-neutral here,
	trying to weasel out of a fact that there are no reliable sources
	supporting her Lithuanian POV; her latest solution was to remove the
	disputed para if she cannot make it weaseled :( [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Is mostly peaceful, but there is a recent discussion between me and 
Renata, with Dr Dan doing his usual trolling. Perhaps some interested 
editors could weight in, as I think that Renata, who is usually quite 
reasonable, is being rather stubborn and not-neutral here, trying to 
weasel out of a fact that there are no reliable sources supporting her 
Lithuanian POV; her latest solution was to remove the disputed para if 
she cannot make it weaseled :(

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Suwa%C5%82ki_Agreement#Sentence_vs_chapter

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

