X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 22 19:50:09 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f826636f0906220942r6f1e5bceu92040091f8ee5e40@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4f045a880906212005o116c23f0l5d42e3cc5d0808cc@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3F0974.10908@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906220040m7117e01dg3771b4145b48b147@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906220722k7c087c49m369a3d84a509972d@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906220740s3bb68919qed15ab389ee872b1@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3FABB7.7000302@post.pl>
	<f826636f0906220942r6f1e5bceu92040091f8ee5e40@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:49:57 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0906221049x1371b366j47a23724c6f1113d@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Piotr, I suggest the following. 1.She should pay more
	attention to certain users who have most recently been sanctioned per
	the official list of blocks and bans in the Digwuren case (especially
	serious violations like harassment and sockpuppetry). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Shell Kinney investigating AE issues
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3174970058375463142=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Piotr, I suggest the following. 1.She should pay more
	attention to certain users who have most recently been sanctioned per
	the official list of blocks and bans in the Digwuren case (especially
	serious violations like harassment and sockpuppetry). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3174970058375463142==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f27f5e9b6b9b046cf3806b

--001485f27f5e9b6b9b046cf3806b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Piotr,

I suggest the following.

1.She should pay more attention to certain users who have most recently been
sanctioned per the official list of blocks and bans in the Digwuren case
(especially serious violations like harassment and sockpuppetry).

This brings up front LokiiT and Russavia

LokiiT was really terrible operating as multiple socks:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/LokiiT )


2. Note user Igny who was recently placed on a formal notice by Tiptoety.

3. Note Vlad_fedorov (she left him a note) - he was cought in sockpuppetry

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Vlad_fedorov

as "la Poet" who exposed my identity in real life to ellol (investigated
anyway) here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ellol&diff=prev&oldid=184466502

give her this link, she can verify who i am from threads deleted at my talk
page by Moreschi

4. You can tell her about a long-term animosity between me and organized
group(s) of Russian users you observed in arbitration cases, and
particularly ellol:

"That was a coded death treat from ellol according to Biophys":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Boris_Stomakhin/Evidence#Threats_by_User:ellol

and you can simply direct her here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Biophys&oldid=280461446

telling, "yes, this is certainly a biased user, and that's his bias"


Andrei




>
> 2009/6/22 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
>
> Shelly wrote to me: "I'm planning on looking at Offliner, Biophys,
>> Digwuren, PasswordUsername, Russavia, Martintg and Ellol. Is there
>> anyone else you think should be added in?" That includes banned editors
>> who will come back (not permbanned).
>>
>> We are discussing 1rr instead of content bans. "Do you think putting the
>> lot of them on 1RR would fix the problem?  Would you suggest one
>> revert per article per week in anything Russian/Estonian related?"
>>
>>
>> --
>> Piotr Konieczny
>>
>> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
>> theory."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--001485f27f5e9b6b9b046cf3806b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Piotr,<br><br>I suggest the following. <br><br>1.She should pay more attent=
ion to certain users who have most recently been sanctioned per the officia=
l list of blocks and bans in the Digwuren case (especially serious violatio=
ns like harassment and sockpuppetry). <br>
<br>This brings up front LokiiT and Russavia <br><br>LokiiT was really terr=
ible operating as multiple socks:<br><br><a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org=
/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/LokiiT">http://en.wikipedia.org=
/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/LokiiT</a> )<br>
<br><br>2. Note user Igny who was recently placed on a formal notice by Tip=
toety.<br><br>3. Note Vlad_fedorov (she left him a note) - he was cought in=
 sockpuppetry=A0 <br><br><a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:=
Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Vlad_fedorov">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki=
pedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Vlad_fedorov</a><br>
<br>as &quot;la Poet&quot; who exposed my identity in real life to ellol (i=
nvestigated anyway) here:<br><br><a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index=
.php?title=3DUser_talk:Ellol&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D184466502">http://=
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Ellol&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;ol=
did=3D184466502</a><br>
<br>give her this link, she can verify who i am from threads deleted at my =
talk page by Moreschi<br><br>4. You can tell her about a long-term animosit=
y between me and organized group(s) of Russian users you observed in arbitr=
ation cases, and particularly ellol:<br>
<br>&quot;That was a coded death treat from ellol according to Biophys&quot=
;:<br><br><a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_ar=
bitration/Boris_Stomakhin/Evidence#Threats_by_User:ellol">http://en.wikiped=
ia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Boris_Stomakhin/Evidence#Thr=
eats_by_User:ellol</a> <br>
<br>and you can simply direct her here:<br><br><a href=3D"http://en.wikiped=
ia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser:Biophys&amp;oldid=3D280461446">http://en.wi=
kipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser:Biophys&amp;oldid=3D280461446</a><br><=
br>telling, &quot;yes, this is certainly a biased user, and that&#39;s his =
bias&quot; <br>
=A0 <br><br>Andrei<br><br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); mar=
gin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div>=A0<br><br><div class=3D"g=
mail_quote">
2009/6/22 Piotr Konieczny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span><d=
iv><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; p=
adding-left: 1ex;">
Shelly wrote to me: &quot;I&#39;m planning on looking at Offliner, Biophys,=
<br>

Digwuren, PasswordUsername, Russavia, Martintg and Ellol. Is there<br>
anyone else you think should be added in?&quot; That includes banned editor=
s<br>
who will come back (not permbanned).<br>
<br>
We are discussing 1rr instead of content bans. &quot;Do you think putting t=
he<br>
lot of them on 1RR would fix the problem? =A0Would you suggest one<br>
revert per article per week in anything Russian/Estonian related?&quot;<br>
<div><br>
<br>
--<br>
Piotr Konieczny<br>
<br>
&quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=
<br>
theory.&quot;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div><div></div><div>Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net" target=3D"_blank">folks@wikipedo=
meter.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--001485f27f5e9b6b9b046cf3806b--


--===============3174970058375463142==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3174970058375463142==--


