X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  8 15:26:38 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A2CE548.60607@post.pl>
References: <6c9a05ec0906060616s7dd20794o40b98d98be6687c8@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2B62C1.8000406@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0906070203x197fee29neb795943eb3f6202@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2C1D70.6050507@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0906071531n102e5748u8142b4308b2535ef@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906071619p4a65b22hdefac48108ef0a84@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906071711s582ed998kd1d2a6b2ae04c432@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906072316l54bd7f3cr8db9d08928734a3a@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2CD905.8030904@post.pl> <4A2CE548.60607@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:26:17 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0906080626n2ba36a96id98c930a3d94221b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Besides 3RR this also is usefull for RfC as Skapperod
	goes against consensus-he took part in discussions on RS noticeboard
	trying to ban Polish cities statements as source of information and the
	general opinion was against him. He uses the same arguments now he used
	then, which were rejected by community. Also-I think there is a template
	to indicate biased sources(that is concentrated on one world location)
	it would be good to use as the Kołobrzeg article is now based on almost
	only German books. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Skapperod on the roll
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0577061484932792621=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Besides 3RR this also is usefull for RfC as Skapperod
	goes against consensus-he took part in discussions on RS noticeboard
	trying to ban Polish cities statements as source of information and the
	general opinion was against him. He uses the same arguments now he used
	then, which were rejected by community. Also-I think there is a template
	to indicate biased sources(that is concentrated on one world location)
	it would be good to use as the Kołobrzeg article is now based on almost
	only German books. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0577061484932792621==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502c7fdeb91f7046bd62f75

--00504502c7fdeb91f7046bd62f75
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Besides 3RR this also is usefull for RfC as Skapperod goes against
consensus-he took part in discussions on  RS noticeboard trying to ban
Polish cities statements as source of information and the general opinion
was against him. He uses the same arguments now he used then, which were
rejected by community.
Also-I think there is a template to indicate biased sources(that is
concentrated on one world location) it would be good to use as the Ko=B3obr=
zeg
article is now based on almost only German books.

2009/6/8 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>

> Piotr Konieczny wrote:
> > radek szulga wrote:
> >> And I think Skap just reverted again after Tymek which would make it 4
> >> - though it's hard to tell because of his editing style.
> >
> > I think he did; I don't have time right now to analyze this but if
> > somebody could do so it would be great. Remember: all it takes is to
> > show that he removed/restored something that was removed/restored by
> > others in a single article 4 times within 24h; those 4 edits don't need
> > to be the same.
>
> Here are 4 reverts - I don't have time to file a report myself; it
> should be noted that more reverts can be found in his recent edits on
> this page, although they fall in longer strings of edits mixed with
> non-reverts. Those four, however, are pretty clear:
> *
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D2950527=
44&oldid=3D295039187
> *
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D2950584=
75&oldid=3D295057425
> *
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D2950584=
75&oldid=3D295057425
> *
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D2951429=
20&oldid=3D295141645
>
>
>
> --
> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
>                                       I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
>  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--00504502c7fdeb91f7046bd62f75
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Besides 3RR this also is usefull for RfC as Skapperod goes against consensu=
s-he took part in discussions on=A0 RS noticeboard trying to ban Polish cit=
ies statements as source of information and the general opinion was against=
 him. He uses the same arguments now he used then, which were rejected by c=
ommunity.<br>
Also-I think there is a template to indicate biased sources(that is concent=
rated on one world location) it would be good to use as the Ko=B3obrzeg art=
icle is now based on almost only German books.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_q=
uote">
2009/6/8 Piotr Konieczny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span><br=
><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204,=
 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class=3D"im=
">Piotr Konieczny wrote:<br>

&gt; radek szulga wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; And I think Skap just reverted again after Tymek which would make =
it 4<br>
&gt;&gt; - though it&#39;s hard to tell because of his editing style.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I think he did; I don&#39;t have time right now to analyze this but if=
<br>
&gt; somebody could do so it would be great. Remember: all it takes is to<b=
r>
&gt; show that he removed/restored something that was removed/restored by<b=
r>
&gt; others in a single article 4 times within 24h; those 4 edits don&#39;t=
 need<br>
&gt; to be the same.<br>
<br>
</div>Here are 4 reverts - I don&#39;t have time to file a report myself; i=
t<br>
should be noted that more reverts can be found in his recent edits on<br>
this page, although they fall in longer strings of edits mixed with<br>
non-reverts. Those four, however, are pretty clear:<br>
*<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&amp;d=
iff=3D295052744&amp;oldid=3D295039187" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedi=
a.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&amp;diff=3D295052744&amp;oldid=3D2=
95039187</a><br>

*<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&amp;d=
iff=3D295058475&amp;oldid=3D295057425" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedi=
a.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&amp;diff=3D295058475&amp;oldid=3D2=
95057425</a><br>

*<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&amp;d=
iff=3D295058475&amp;oldid=3D295057425" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedi=
a.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&amp;diff=3D295058475&amp;oldid=3D2=
95057425</a><br>

*<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&amp;d=
iff=3D295142920&amp;oldid=3D295141645" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedi=
a.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&amp;diff=3D295142920&amp;oldid=3D2=
95141645</a><br>

<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __<br>
 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D&gt;<br>
&quot;Lennier, get us the hell out of here.&quot; =A0 =A0 |||<br>
&quot;Initiating &#39;getting the hell out of here&#39; maneuver.&quot;<br>
 =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:&quot;The Hour of the Wolf&quot;<br=
>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--00504502c7fdeb91f7046bd62f75--


--===============0577061484932792621==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0577061484932792621==--


