X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 17 20:51:35 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
From: PetersJV@aol.com
Message-ID: <cc7.56928240.376a9518@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:51:04 EDT
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5377
X-AOL-IP: 205.188.169.201
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  See diff here...
	_http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vecrumba&diff=next&oldi
	d=296763195_
	(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vecrumba&diff=next&oldid=296763195)
	(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vecrumba&diff=next&oldid=295144767)
	mainly this is to Biophys... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.0 NO_REAL_NAME           From: does not include a real name
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0004]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,HTML_40_50,
	HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] from Offliner... (would like to respond sooner rather than
	later)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7858795140137056595=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  See diff here...
	_http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vecrumba&diff=next&oldi
	d=296763195_
	(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vecrumba&diff=next&oldid=296763195)
	(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vecrumba&diff=next&oldid=295144767)
	mainly this is to Biophys... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.0 NO_REAL_NAME           From: does not include a real name
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============7858795140137056595==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1245264664"


-------------------------------1245264664
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

See diff here...
_http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vecrumba&diff=next&oldi
d=296763195_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vecrumba&diff=next&oldid=296763195)  
(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vecrumba&diff=next&oldid=295144767) 
mainly this is to Biophys...
 
Is it possible to separate out the various organizations which do exist  
from "allegations" of their activities (if not already)? I don't necessarily  
want to open to [[Allegations...]] that a particular organization even  
exists.
 
So, for now "fairness" seems to indicate supporting [[Allegations of...]]  
since the articles relate to operations and are not directly about a 
department  or organization (under which the operations would be described and/or  
alleged).
 
This might be a place we need to be flexible, especially as we do want  
"allegations of" prefacing all the anti-Estonian content being created. 
(Amnesty  International's report on Estonia is a bunch of junk, but they are 
perceived as  reputable, for example. This allows us to keep them, van der Linden, 
et al. as  allegations.)
 
If we are agreed, this might be something we can point to in future  
proceedings as our side being reasonable. However, I want to check our consensus  
before I indicate a (very grudging of course) yes in "fair play." This will 
be  touchy, however, as we don't want to venture into "Allegations of Soviet 
 occupation of..."--the proper response there would be to add a section 
called  "Allegations of non-occupation".
 
/Peters
**************Dell Days of Deals! June 15-24 - A New Deal Everyday! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222865043x1201494942/aol?redir=http:%2F%2F
ad.doubleclick.net%2Fclk%3B215692145%3B38015538%3Bh)

-------------------------------1245264664
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=3Drole_body style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY=
: Arial" 
bottomMargin=3D7 leftMargin=3D7 topMargin=3D7 rightMargin=3D7><FONT id=3Dr=
ole_document 
face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>
<DIV>See diff here...</DIV>
<DIV><A 
href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Vecrumba&amp=
;diff=3Dnext&amp;oldid=3D296763195">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti=
tle=3DUser_talk:Vecrumba&amp;diff=3Dnext&amp;oldid=3D296763195</A><A 
href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Vecrumba&amp=
;diff=3Dnext&amp;oldid=3D295144767"></A></DIV>
<DIV>mainly this is to Biophys...</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Is it possible to separate out the various organizations which do exi=
st 
from "allegations" of their activities (if not already)? I don't necessari=
ly 
want to open to [[Allegations...]] that a particular organization even 
exists.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>So, for now "fairness" seems to indicate supporting [[Allegations of.=
..]] 
since the articles relate to operations and are not directly about a depar=
tment 
or organization (under which the operations would be described and/or 
alleged).</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>This might be a place we need to be flexible, especially as we do wan=
t 
"allegations of" prefacing all the anti-Estonian content being created. (A=
mnesty 
International's report on Estonia is a bunch of junk, but they are perceiv=
ed as 
reputable, for example. This allows us to keep them, van der Linden, et al=
. as 
allegations.)</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>If we are agreed, this might be something we can point to in future=
 
proceedings as our side being reasonable. However, I want to check our con=
sensus 
before I indicate a (very grudging of course) yes in "fair play." This wil=
l be 
touchy, however, as we don't want to venture into "Allegations of Soviet=
 
occupation of..."--the proper response there would be to add a section cal=
led 
"Allegations of non-occupation".</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>/Peters</DIV></FONT><DIV CLASS=3D"aol_ad_footer" ID=3D"c6d0dded90954c=
d7ab71186d2d7d6483"><br/><font style=3D"color:black;font:normal 10pt arial=
,san-serif;"> <hr style=3D"margin-top:10px"/><A HREF=3Dhttp://pr.atwola.co=
m/promoclk/100126575x1222865043x1201494942/aol?redir=3Dhttp:%2F%2Fad.doubl=
eclick.net%2Fclk%3B215692145%3B38015538%3Bh>Dell Days of Deals! June 15-24=
 - A New Deal Everyday!</A></font></DIV></BODY></HTML>

-------------------------------1245264664--


--===============7858795140137056595==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7858795140137056595==--


