X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Aug 16 16:19:27 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 307965.40773.bm@omp401.mail.sp1.yahoo.com
Message-ID: <91981.71050.qm@web45103.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: ApkTWi4VM1kStzfeI.VcAOu.q.ZEjPGjAKn5siqWFVFj9rLA_srIVZCI1DtdslyCzQEh8.VkQZYCDNUAMsmj8O68z4DrM3R1Q2BtWlVyZpnwU5G4xPbeRWvYSQM1sNERXEe2RckuSYfqJJbwV98BTXdqcaQuS1RWKVGRML_2V75.alH13eHYszyWLOuS_6ImY.f4Fn.5zfxEM3_H2e2ONgDbX1pjj2YOsP67hhW80KF8kkvS5Tu9j5nZlKAeemgZ7QlYIWOwKBRi8POM6_I0dz8Dxa_L7Ukzvhmhe0PACtoh4yaF1YsDVrtJ7rxjnTI-
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/6.1.2 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 07:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A87C5AD.1020605@post.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Oh...O.K. You are right Piotr. --- On Sun, 8/16/09,
	Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: From: Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> Subject: Re: [WPM] Can Lokyz be reported? To:
	"Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net> Date: Sunday, August
	16, 2009, 12:39 AM [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Can Lokyz be reported?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3815342597005888630=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Oh...O.K. You are right Piotr. --- On Sun, 8/16/09,
	Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: From: Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> Subject: Re: [WPM] Can Lokyz be reported? To:
	"Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net> Date: Sunday, August
	16, 2009, 12:39 AM [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3815342597005888630==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-319315186-1250432360=:71050"

--0-319315186-1250432360=:71050
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Oh...O.K. You are right Piotr.

--- On Sun, 8/16/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
Subject: Re: [WPM] Can Lokyz be reported?
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Sunday, August 16, 2009, 12:39 AM

Jack wrote:
> Can Lokyz be reported? He reverted 5 times? Radek?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lithuanian_collaboration_during_World_War_II&action=history

And how many times you reverted...? I am too tired to check the details 
but history implies 4, and remember - even three can get you in trouble. 
In other words, if you have to revert 3 times, you are making your 
opponent reverts meaningless, since you are in danger of getting a 
double block :((


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks



      
--0-319315186-1250432360=:71050
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Oh...O.K. You are right Piotr.<br><br>--- On <b>Sun, 8/16/09, Piotr Konieczny <i>&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: Piotr Konieczny &lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;<br>Subject: Re: [WPM] Can Lokyz be reported?<br>To: "Wikipedia statistics" &lt;folks@wikipedometer.net&gt;<br>Date: Sunday, August 16, 2009, 12:39 AM<br><br><div class="plainMail">Jack wrote:<br>&gt; Can Lokyz be reported? He reverted 5 times? Radek?<br>&gt; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lithuanian_collaboration_during_World_War_II&amp;action=history" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lithuanian_collaboration_during_World_War_II&amp;action=history</a><br><br>And how many times you reverted...? I am too tired to check the details <br>but history implies
 4, and remember - even three can get you in trouble. <br>In other words, if you have to revert 3 times, you are making your <br>opponent reverts meaningless, since you are in danger of getting a <br>double block :((<br><br><br>-- <br>Piotr Konieczny<br><br>"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in <br>theory."<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br><a ymailto="mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net" href="/mc/compose?to=folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br><a href="http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target="_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>

      
--0-319315186-1250432360=:71050--



--===============3815342597005888630==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3815342597005888630==--



