X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jul  7 15:21:34 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0907070533m7f13c010p8b06b8a6a2e1edbc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0907031517taba84aaodd143d82c724e8db@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907061321w3bb0ed45ne1c45a022b2a4ea3@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907061327p1c5ce381yc5496196b7b7e8f4@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0907061547r48b175adk91f8f9cc8fc69339@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A5282D8.5000604@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0907061610o58cd553cw39ee9c1de14f6bf@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A5299F1.1000207@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0907070059v59ab4d50wca39f1a9d5a87cc8@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907070514m197bc2a0o1baab97ce1a1c625@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907070533m7f13c010p8b06b8a6a2e1edbc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:21:21 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907070621k61699b99kc595911ad1914881@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: After Thatcher's latest at the Clarification request I
	think I'm going to skip thanking him. A part of me wants to ask him
	who's a bigger crybaby, an editor who appeals an unjust sanction, or an
	administrator who just can't stand to have his rulings and omnipotence
	questioned? Not gonna, but want to. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appeal
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8404211939962152091=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  After Thatcher's latest at the Clarification request I
	think I'm going to skip thanking him. A part of me wants to ask him
	who's a bigger crybaby, an editor who appeals an unjust sanction, or an
	administrator who just can't stand to have his rulings and omnipotence
	questioned? Not gonna, but want to. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8404211939962152091==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e659f8c8a76196046e1d7f0f

--0016e659f8c8a76196046e1d7f0f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

After Thatcher's latest at the Clarification request I think I'm going to
skip thanking him. A part of me wants to ask him who's a bigger crybaby, an
editor who appeals an unjust sanction, or an administrator who just can't
stand to have his rulings and omnipotence questioned? Not gonna, but want
to.

Radek

--0016e659f8c8a76196046e1d7f0f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

After Thatcher&#39;s latest at the Clarification request I think I&#39;m go=
ing to skip thanking him. A part of me wants to ask him who&#39;s a bigger =
crybaby, an editor who appeals an unjust sanction, or an administrator who =
just can&#39;t stand to have his rulings and omnipotence questioned? Not go=
nna, but want to.<br>
<br>Radek<br>

--0016e659f8c8a76196046e1d7f0f--


--===============8404211939962152091==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8404211939962152091==--


