X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:41:17 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906211438u405219b9se5a775761f8b8a7e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3EA461.2050208@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906211423x2123ead9v1da04a5fa7e3242c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211428y5ea28c88wafdde68863c6a2bd@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211430n74ede828t87898697dbadcaa0@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211432i395bb0d1v4ace9d2f4da52cc4@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211438u405219b9se5a775761f8b8a7e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:41:08 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906211441w1782cb63x753f942d98d167bb@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:38, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Right, so I don't think I should ask about
	the moving around of the > comments though I can still ask somewhere
	about the warning/"advice" > on Piotrus' page if it comes to that. I'll
	wait and if need be ask > Tiptoety since "he's been involved before" to
	take a look at Jeh's > behavior. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5799706641080748598=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:38, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Right, so I don't think I should ask about
	the moving around of the > comments though I can still ask somewhere
	about the warning/"advice" > on Piotrus' page if it comes to that. I'll
	wait and if need be ask > Tiptoety since "he's been involved before" to
	take a look at Jeh's > behavior. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5799706641080748598==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cfaf8a841e046ce29d37

--00504502cfaf8a841e046ce29d37
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:38, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

> Right, so I don't think I should ask about the moving around of the
> comments though I can still ask somewhere about the warning/"advice"
> on Piotrus' page if it comes to that. I'll wait and if need be ask
> Tiptoety since "he's been involved before" to take a look at Jeh's
> behavior.


Well, Biophys just mentioned one of the movings on Piotrus' talkpage, so it
stands to reason that after a while, you'd go and watch it.  And then, you'd
know.  But still, getting admins to look into Jehochman's powergrab seems to
have higher priority.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--00504502cfaf8a841e046ce29d37
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:38, radek szulga <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rsszulga@gmail.com<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:=
0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Right, so I don&#39;t think I should ask about the moving around of the<br>
comments though I can still ask somewhere about the warning/&quot;advice&qu=
ot;<br>
on Piotrus&#39; page if it comes to that. I&#39;ll wait and if need be ask<=
br>
Tiptoety since &quot;he&#39;s been involved before&quot; to take a look at =
Jeh&#39;s<br>
behavior.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, Biophys just mentioned one =
of the movings on Piotrus&#39; talkpage, so it stands to reason that after =
a while, you&#39;d go and watch it. =C2=A0And then, you&#39;d know. =C2=A0B=
ut still, getting admins to look into Jehochman&#39;s powergrab seems to ha=
ve higher priority.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--00504502cfaf8a841e046ce29d37--


--===============5799706641080748598==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5799706641080748598==--


