X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 24 02:10:58 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906231703w36f4815enabd44a736c919f79@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c91.42324350.3772ba2d@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906231703w36f4815enabd44a736c919f79@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:10:48 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906231710y8dc47d1vf5330e425040b41@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I just saw him and even just stubbed an article based
	on
	one of his edits (he de-red linked it). I was wondering who it was.
	Radek 2009/6/23 Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>: > BTW, watch
	carefully after this guy: > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ostateczny_Krach_Systemu_Korporacji
	> > That is our friend HanzoHattori. Try NOT to contact him, as not to
	bring > attention of the Russian team. He has email - use email if you
	need to > contact him. > > He usually does technical edits. What a hell
	they blocked him? > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:07 PM,
	<PetersJV@aol.com> wrote: >> >> In a message dated 6/23/2009 11:16:28
	A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >> wikibiophys@gmail.com writes: >> >> OK, I
	talked with Thatcher. That's a serious admin. It looks like I will >>
	never edit articles like Litvinenko and Russian apartment bombings,
	because >> if I do she will probably issue me a topic ban at those
	articles, not >> mentioning 1RR restriction after first revert. At least
	that is my >> interpretation. >> >> Yes, Thatcher is serious. Which can
	be a good thing. I responded to >> PasswordUsername's lobbying to
	punish
	me just because I was not part of the >> party. Given it's Thatcher, I
	stated my issue, provided diffs, and no >> histrionics, plus
	specifically that I was not counter-requesting punishment >> in the
	other direction. It seemed a good opportunity to appear to be the >>
	reasonable party so our side can build some good will. I SO SO SO SO
	wanted >> to use the "nuclear option" (like a couple of my old postings
	on Anonimu). >> >> /Peters >> >> An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See
	Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! >> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
	>> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> > > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] To Dig, Bio and all who are considering leaving
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I just saw him and even just stubbed an article based on
	one of his edits (he de-red linked it). I was wondering who it was.
	Radek 2009/6/23 Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>: > BTW, watch
	carefully after this guy: > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ostateczny_Krach_Systemu_Korporacji
	> > That is our friend HanzoHattori. Try NOT to contact him, as not to
	bring > attention of the Russian team. He has email - use email if you
	need to > contact him. > > He usually does technical edits. What a hell
	they blocked him? > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:07 PM,
	<PetersJV@aol.com> wrote: >> >> In a message dated 6/23/2009 11:16:28
	A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >> wikibiophys@gmail.com writes: >> >> OK, I
	talked with Thatcher. That's a serious admin. It looks like I will >>
	never edit articles like Litvinenko and Russian apartment bombings,
	because >> if I do she will probably issue me a topic ban at those
	articles, not >> mentioning 1RR restriction after first revert. At least
	that is my >> interpretation. >> >> Yes, Thatcher is serious. Which can
	be a good thing. I responded to >> PasswordUsername's lobbying to punish
	me just because I was not part of the >> party. Given it's Thatcher, I
	stated my issue, provided diffs, and no >> histrionics, plus
	specifically that I was not counter-requesting punishment >> in the
	other direction. It seemed a good opportunity to appear to be the >>
	reasonable party so our side can build some good will. I SO SO SO SO
	wanted >> to use the "nuclear option" (like a couple of my old postings
	on Anonimu). >> >> /Peters >> >> An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See
	Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! >> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
	>> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> > > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I just saw him and even just stubbed an article based on one of his
edits (he de-red linked it). I was wondering who it was.

Radek


2009/6/23 Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>:
> BTW, watch carefully after this guy:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ostateczny_Krach_Syste=
mu_Korporacji
>
> That is our friend HanzoHattori. Try NOT to contact him, as not to bring
> attention of the Russian team.=A0 He has email - use email if you need to
> contact him.
>
> He usually does=A0 technical edits. What a hell they blocked him?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:07 PM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> In a message dated 6/23/2009 11:16:28 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> wikibiophys@gmail.com writes:
>>
>> OK, I talked with Thatcher. That's a serious admin.=A0 It looks like I w=
ill
>> never edit articles like Litvinenko and Russian apartment bombings, beca=
use
>> if I do she will probably issue me a topic ban at those articles,=A0 not
>> mentioning 1RR restriction after first revert. At least that is my
>> interpretation.
>>
>> Yes, Thatcher is serious. Which can be a good thing. I responded to
>> PasswordUsername's lobbying to punish me just because I was not part of =
the
>> party. Given it's Thatcher, I stated my issue, provided diffs, and no
>> histrionics, plus specifically that I was not counter-requesting punishm=
ent
>> in the other direction. It seemed a good opportunity to appear to be the
>> reasonable party so our side can build some good will. I SO SO SO SO wan=
ted
>> to use the "nuclear option" (like a couple of my old postings on Anonimu=
).
>>
>> /Peters
>> ________________________________
>> An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

