X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  1 19:31:47 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A240F9A.5040108@post.pl>
References: <4A238480.5040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906010158l333a1c0bwd3d1255df947b517@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A240F9A.5040108@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:31:36 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906011031p4b179ea6gffb621a35f27587d@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 20:27, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > The problem with sharing accounts (which is
	forbidden - remember > Russavia's recent case) is the CheckUser IP
	trace. If it could identify > that an IP is shared, let's say, between
	several of us and Molobo, it > would be BAD. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] [WMP] Molobo ban
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4606225733208101856=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.2
X-Spam_score_int: 12
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 20:27, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > The problem with sharing accounts (which is
	forbidden - remember > Russavia's recent case) is the CheckUser IP
	trace. If it could identify > that an IP is shared, let's say, between
	several of us and Molobo, it > would be BAD. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-1.1 BAYES_05               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5%
	[score: 0.0172]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4606225733208101856==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163605988c59833a046b4ccc7e

--00163605988c59833a046b4ccc7e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 20:27, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> The problem with sharing accounts (which is forbidden - remember
> Russavia's recent case) is the CheckUser IP trace. If it could identify
> that an IP is shared, let's say, between several of us and Molobo, it
> would be BAD.


Which means that either a proxy is needed, or the behaviour must be such
that a technical checkuser will never raise.  Or preferrably, both.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--00163605988c59833a046b4ccc7e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 20:27, Piotr Konieczny <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">The problem with sharing accounts (which is forbidden - r=
emember<br></div>
Russavia&#39;s recent case) is the CheckUser IP trace. If it could identify=
<br>
that an IP is shared, let&#39;s say, between several of us and Molobo, it<b=
r>
would be BAD.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Which means that either a pro=
xy is needed, or the behaviour must be such that a technical checkuser will=
 never raise. =C2=A0Or preferrably, both.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>
Andres Soolo<br>

--00163605988c59833a046b4ccc7e--


--===============4606225733208101856==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4606225733208101856==--


