X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu May 28 09:15:09 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A1E2E3F.30306@post.pl>
References: <6c9a05ec0905231259r4ffb1fa7i350386b8cd565ea@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880905241413v2e69659dt38897431bfaa4f9a@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A1B0B07.8070607@post.pl> <4A1C2981.5070801@post.pl>
	<25890ca0905261104q5c8255esa31cff6978356cdf@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A1C5890.7070103@post.pl>
	<4f045a880905261543v482cac2ew3343341990304cb6@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A1D9D29.5020807@post.pl>
	<25890ca0905271342p2266776el5ab3e92702419fef@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A1E2E3F.30306@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:14:56 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880905280014r457170ddu3799a8e8e7d9ceca@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I've already left a message on Mayalld's on talk page
	mentioning that Deacon's comments should be removed. Since the
	technical
	evidence shows no connection and it comes down to perception and
	judgment, then comments by Deacon are not helpful as it adds to the
	negative view. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon and Molobo
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I've already left a message on Mayalld's on talk page
	mentioning that Deacon's comments should be removed. Since the technical
	evidence shows no connection and it comes down to perception and
	judgment, then comments by Deacon are not helpful as it adds to the
	negative view. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I've already left a message on Mayalld's on talk page mentioning that
Deacon's comments should be removed. Since the technical evidence
shows no connection and it comes down to perception and judgment, then
comments by Deacon are not helpful as it adds to the negative view.

Martin


On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
> radek szulga wrote:
>> The only thing is that the person who removed those comments, Mayalld,
>> seems to quite sympathetic to the view that this case was a mess from
>> the get go and that all this secret stuff should've never happened.
>> Basically I think s/he is just generally annoyed at how this was
>> handled and so he's trying to re-focus it. So we don't want to annoy
>> him more than the other side.
>> But fuss maybe a good idea - particularly since Deacon's comment "The
>> unpublished evidence makes it highly likely that Molobo ..." was not
>> removed - maybe just ask Mayalld why that was left in there.
>
> Certainly, please do ask Mayalld about this. I'd also repeat our
> questions, as well as your suggestions about possible admin
> shopping/bias in terms who sees the secret evidence/mistrial in a new
> section on article's talk.
>
>
> --
> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
>                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
>  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

