X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Aug  1 20:55:53 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0908011137o232ec99fi4e4162dc5ad5d966@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0907311416s7e008558k38fe0e11c1e16959@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907311617p28b4d606y55f9c5c4724df035@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0908010416n3efc24b3xab98e30adfdd94f8@mail.gmail.com>
	<BAY110-W219A4D15E35C5590BF15F0D6110@phx.gbl>
	<25890ca0908011132g14a85acaica49e56f96132800@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0908011136j7e984d47n78a975d4d8ec67b8@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0908011137o232ec99fi4e4162dc5ad5d966@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:55:41 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0908011155x41c7fedfycaff3cb7f93ab39e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Try looking at this,
	maybe something from there would be of help:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Eastern_European_disputes/Evidence#Regarding_Scinurae
	2009/8/1 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>: > Basically, some one give
	me the dirt on Sciurinea and I will comment on his > report. > > Radek
	>
	> > 2009/8/1 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> >> >> Also, it seems like
	this is a bit of forum shopping - or it would be if it >> was filed by
	the same user. Basically all the diffs concern the Volhynia >>
	Massacres
	article which is already being dealt with in the AN/3RR report - >> so
	this is the same thing done again. The only diffs which do not concern
	>> this article are the ones on Polish-American template >>
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Polish_American&diff=prev&oldid=294848257],
	>> and my AE report on Deacon >>
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=295216003],
	>> both of which are completely spurious. >> >> Radek >> >> >> 2009/8/1
	radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> >>> >>> Ughhh, this is what I was
	afraid of - that other people would jump in at >>> the chance to get
	you. Sciurinea is like the 'attack dog' of some of these >>> folks and
	I'm sure somebody contacted him and asked him to file the report >>>
	(note he never edits the articles himself anymore). I can't help but
	notice >>> how this is the same approach that was used with Molobo -
	Sciurinea filed >>> that one too IIRC. >>> I really think you should
	make peace with Faustian at this point - >>> basically settle that, and
	then let's try to turn this around on Sciurinea >>> and whoever else
	shows up. We'd need to dig up some history on Sciurinea >>> here as
	well
	(Molobo?) - basically to show that even though he doesn't edit >>>
	Eastern European articles anymore he's very much got a strong bias. >>>
	>>> Other than that, we need comments which point out that a lot of the
	diffs >>> that he provides are completely spurious or very old. Also
	link to previous >>> instances where Sciurinea went after Polish
	editors
	and was told not to >>> waste admin time. I think the only ones that
	can hurt you here is the latest >>> against [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] For Jacurek/additional editors helpfull/Guess who is
	Lukaschek...
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Try looking at this, maybe something from there would be
	of help:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Eastern_European_disputes/Evidence#Regarding_Scinurae
	2009/8/1 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>: > Basically, some one give
	me the dirt on Sciurinea and I will comment on his > report. > > Radek >
	> > 2009/8/1 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> >> >> Also, it seems like
	this is a bit of forum shopping - or it would be if it >> was filed by
	the same user. Basically all the diffs concern the Volhynia >> Massacres
	article which is already being dealt with in the AN/3RR report - >> so
	this is the same thing done again. The only diffs which do not concern
	>> this article are the ones on Polish-American template >>
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Polish_American&diff=prev&oldid=294848257],
	>> and my AE report on Deacon >>
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=295216003],
	>> both of which are completely spurious. >> >> Radek >> >> >> 2009/8/1
	radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> >>> >>> Ughhh, this is what I was
	afraid of - that other people would jump in at >>> the chance to get
	you. Sciurinea is like the 'attack dog' of some of these >>> folks and
	I'm sure somebody contacted him and asked him to file the report >>>
	(note he never edits the articles himself anymore). I can't help but
	notice >>> how this is the same approach that was used with Molobo -
	Sciurinea filed >>> that one too IIRC. >>> I really think you should
	make peace with Faustian at this point - >>> basically settle that, and
	then let's try to turn this around on Sciurinea >>> and whoever else
	shows up. We'd need to dig up some history on Sciurinea >>> here as well
	(Molobo?) - basically to show that even though he doesn't edit >>>
	Eastern European articles anymore he's very much got a strong bias. >>>
	>>> Other than that, we need comments which point out that a lot of the
	diffs >>> that he provides are completely spurious or very old. Also
	link to previous >>> instances where Sciurinea went after Polish editors
	and was told not to >>> waste admin time. I think the only ones that can
	hurt you here is the latest >>> against [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 MIME_BASE64_NO_NAME    RAW: base64 attachment does not have a file name
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

[encoded data, 21112 characters]

