X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jan  3 09:35:52 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4f045a880901030035h2e0a050ka88ce15930146118@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:35:41 +1100
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I've noticed this
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petri_Krohn&diff=261247662&oldid=261196671
	Should we be concerned about ScienceApologist taking up Petri's POV
	pushing agenda? Cheers, Martin [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] ScienceApologist
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4899097888025980731=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.5
X-Spam_score_int: 15
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I've noticed this
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petri_Krohn&diff=261247662&oldid=261196671
	Should we be concerned about ScienceApologist taking up Petri's POV
	pushing agenda? Cheers, Martin [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4998]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4899097888025980731==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_194497_16987506.1230971741068"

------=_Part_194497_16987506.1230971741068
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I've noticed this
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petri_Krohn&diff=261247662&oldid=261196671

Should we be concerned about ScienceApologist taking up Petri's POV pushing
agenda?

Cheers,
Martin

PS: Happy New Year!

------=_Part_194497_16987506.1230971741068
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div>I&#39;ve noticed this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petri_Krohn&amp;diff=261247662&amp;oldid=261196671">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petri_Krohn&amp;diff=261247662&amp;oldid=261196671</a></div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Should we be concerned about ScienceApologist taking up Petri&#39;s POV pushing agenda?</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div>Martin</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>PS: Happy New Year!</div>

------=_Part_194497_16987506.1230971741068--


--===============4899097888025980731==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4899097888025980731==--


