X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jul 20 01:37:02 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A63A636.6030700@post.pl>
References: <845198.33042.qm@web32806.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<4A63A636.6030700@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 01:37:01 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0907191637k44fbbf45y74e64d9df56d92d5@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razwiedka 2009/7/20 Piotr
	Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> > piotr micula wrote: > > > overconfident,
	and decided to act on their own, to the dislike of the > > razvedka, who
	decided to counterattack. Tusk and his men were useful > > Razcedka?
	Haven't heard that term before; Wiki has no article on it. > Perhaps you
	could stub it? > > -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about
	Wikipedia
	is, that it just works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] New party on Polish political stage
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8222315217421621809=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razwiedka 2009/7/20 Piotr
	Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> > piotr micula wrote: > > > overconfident,
	and decided to act on their own, to the dislike of the > > razvedka, who
	decided to counterattack. Tusk and his men were useful > > Razcedka?
	Haven't heard that term before; Wiki has no article on it. > Perhaps you
	could stub it? > > -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about Wikipedia
	is, that it just works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8222315217421621809==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364efa408be6f0046f177f2a

--0016364efa408be6f0046f177f2a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razwiedka

2009/7/20 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>

> piotr micula wrote:
>
> > overconfident, and decided to act on their own, to the dislike of the
> > razvedka, who decided to counterattack. Tusk and his men were useful
>
> Razcedka? Haven't heard that term before; Wiki has no article on it.
> Perhaps you could stub it?
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--0016364efa408be6f0046f177f2a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<a href=3D"http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razwiedka">http://pl.wikipedia.org/=
wiki/Razwiedka</a><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/20 Piotr Koniec=
zny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D=
"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0=
pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">piotr micula wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; overconfident, and decided to act on their own, to the dislike of the<=
br>
&gt; razvedka, who decided to counterattack. Tusk and his men were useful<b=
r>
<br>
</div>Razcedka? Haven&#39;t heard that term before; Wiki has no article on =
it.<br>
Perhaps you could stub it?<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
Piotr Konieczny<br>
<br>
&quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=
<br>
theory.&quot;<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--0016364efa408be6f0046f177f2a--


--===============8222315217421621809==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8222315217421621809==--


