X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Sep  8 23:40:02 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f826636f0909080938n6b1bc93lfabd9811222a0fa5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4f045a880909032113r3873793fh58d4229ae9523edb@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0909040642i333c291k17d6a7b0e899ef3@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0909040713w6455d0b5qfaf6261c86ccb43e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0909041205v3a9e2fal6c326c4ce33d6d38@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0909041232g2eaf7999s1044c1c0571a5685@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0909041309j2fb27201qa00aec48a341bd2c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880909041319r11cb1bc8x6fe00eb8245b7d22@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0909041435t1e7ef4c3n3502576c66747b5d@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880909052347w7c16b90eq8f3c376a2ed7812f@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0909080938n6b1bc93lfabd9811222a0fa5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:39:56 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880909081439u37747e14vfee50d57c800d86c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Your comments were well balanced. It was my mistake in
	saying to much, since Rjanag had already rejected my earlier 3RR report
	and it looked like I was block shopping. The successful Russavia case
	shows that is it sometimes better to be more restrained. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] PU escapes clear 3RR violation
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Your comments were well balanced. It was my mistake in
	saying to much, since Rjanag had already rejected my earlier 3RR report
	and it looked like I was block shopping. The successful Russavia case
	shows that is it sometimes better to be more restrained. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Your comments were well balanced. It was my mistake in saying to much,
since Rjanag had already rejected my earlier 3RR report and it looked
like I was block shopping.

The successful Russavia case shows that is it sometimes better to be
more restrained.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Dorin Cheptea<dorin.cheptea@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2009/9/6 Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
>>
>> I regret jumping in with my comments now, I went in too hard and gave
>> Rjanag an excuse to do nothing.
>>
>
> I hope my comment didn't damage. I tried to get the best out of the existing
> situation: it was clear Rjanag won't block him now, so at least i tried to
> have some "obligation" hanging upon him for the future.
> Dorin
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

