X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  9 20:03:15 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6fb557d70906090932w1b58e374w647634f714ce98a2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <430756.3923.qm@web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<f826636f0906061827w774f6400ree23dfb2b5c51dc9@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70906080531s492a2a09w494e6e38d4ff7d77@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0906080758y6824f97ah77013351f0b0b0f5@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70906090932w1b58e374w647634f714ce98a2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:03:02 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906091103p4e940c62x256694c4f15d0766@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: They're not really directly related. But they can act
	in
	the role of "auxilliaries". Deacon is guaranteed to show up to any big
	dispute that involves Piotrus or other Polish editors and act
	"uninvolved" for the other side. As long as it's just slow reverting
	back and forth between us and the CUSSRC he's not going to get involved
	but if there's a bigger argument, he'll be there for sure. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] More cabal theory
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  They're not really directly related. But they can act in
	the role of "auxilliaries". Deacon is guaranteed to show up to any big
	dispute that involves Piotrus or other Polish editors and act
	"uninvolved" for the other side. As long as it's just slow reverting
	back and forth between us and the CUSSRC he's not going to get involved
	but if there's a bigger argument, he'll be there for sure. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

They're not really directly related. But they can act in the role of
"auxilliaries".  Deacon is guaranteed to show up to any big dispute
that involves Piotrus or other Polish editors and act "uninvolved" for
the other side. As long as it's just slow reverting back and forth
between us and the CUSSRC he's not going to get involved but if
there's a bigger argument, he'll be there for sure.


2009/6/9 Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>:
> Yes, though I never got how Sk=E4pper=F6d or Deacon of Pndapetzim relate
> to the Cyber-SSSR cabal.
>
> M.
>
>> 1) we want to have an anti-team USSR cabal. Currently that's the main
>> problem eastern Europeans have, but the two things are not identical. We=
 can
>> subsequently use our experience with Soviet topics for other areas if we
>> find common goals, I agree, but without damage to the main issue.
>> Dorin
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

