X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Apr 28 21:49:22 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <49F75DFF.9090406@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:50:23 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <226476.72978.qm@web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	<c3b2b3db0904271114y495f9b0dl1328b86a07723d9f@mail.gmail.com>	<f826636f0904271358r8c08b23ifc2991dde9e442c6@mail.gmail.com>	<c3b2b3db0904271410w78ed56bbh730525025f0dccd4@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0904272130n43965cf2m9305908aaf6ad130@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0904272130n43965cf2m9305908aaf6ad130@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > I do not think Russia has the
	technical capacity to work out its own > analogue, although its SIGINT
	capture capability has significantly > improved since 1990. (For just
	one example, Russia now employs > satellite communications eavesdropping
	stations.) However, with some > paranoia, it would be possible to
	postulate that the Chinese > cybermilitary might have compromised
	ECHELON control network, thereby > acquiring access to a massive amount
	of network traffic, and might after > some sifting pass some of this
	captured traffic on to Russian > three-letter organisations. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > I do not think Russia has the
	technical capacity to work out its own > analogue, although its SIGINT
	capture capability has significantly > improved since 1990. (For just
	one example, Russia now employs > satellite communications eavesdropping
	stations.) However, with some > paranoia, it would be possible to
	postulate that the Chinese > cybermilitary might have compromised
	ECHELON control network, thereby > acquiring access to a massive amount
	of network traffic, and might after > some sifting pass some of this
	captured traffic on to Russian > three-letter organisations. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Digwuren wrote:

> I do not think Russia has the technical capacity to work out its own 
> analogue, although its SIGINT capture capability has significantly 
> improved since 1990.  (For just one example, Russia now employs 
> satellite communications eavesdropping stations.)  However, with some 
> paranoia, it would be possible to postulate that the Chinese 
> cybermilitary might have compromised ECHELON control network, thereby 
> acquiring access to a massive amount of network traffic, and might after 
> some sifting pass some of this captured traffic on to Russian 
> three-letter organisations.

I'd rather think that Russian HUMINT has penetrated Echelon; after all, 
wasn't (isn't...?) HUMINT Russian speciality?

We could probably play with encrypting our emails... but I don't think 
it is that important :D I mean, paranoia is healthy, but... :)


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

