X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Aug 17 23:40:37 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:40:30 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0908171440y61ab752fh78770ec33b8dc3ed@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: So PU has made exactly three reverts in 24 hours in at
	least three different articles Collaboration with Axis powers during
	WWII Anti-Russian sentiment Nochnoy Dozor (group) there might be
	others.
	The fact is that he hasn't broken 3RR on any of them. However, since
	he's doing this on a group of related article and fence-hugging in each
	case clearly indicates that he's edit warring, so this may be enough for
	a report. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: [WPM] PasswordUsername fence hugging
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1034235987046878081=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  So PU has made exactly three reverts in 24 hours in at
	least three different articles Collaboration with Axis powers during
	WWII Anti-Russian sentiment Nochnoy Dozor (group) there might be others.
	The fact is that he hasn't broken 3RR on any of them. However, since
	he's doing this on a group of related article and fence-hugging in each
	case clearly indicates that he's edit warring, so this may be enough for
	a report. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1034235987046878081==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b62a63e0aac04715d40ab

--0016e65b62a63e0aac04715d40ab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

So PU has made exactly three reverts in 24 hours in at least three different
articles
Collaboration with Axis powers during WWII
Anti-Russian sentiment
Nochnoy Dozor (group)

there might be others. The fact is that he hasn't broken 3RR on any of them.
However,  since he's doing this on a group of related article and
fence-hugging in each case clearly indicates that he's edit warring, so this
may be enough for a report.

I think most of us are ok in terms of reverts on these pages, though
probably the standard accusations of 'tag-teaming' will be made.

What do others think? Enough? Or too risky?

We could also throw in some of the "POINT" edits he's been making recently.

Radek


2009/8/17 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>

> Hi,
> some two years ago, Times Online has published an article, sourced
> apparently mostly to Ion Mihai Pacepa of what's probably Securitate,
> claiming that KGB deliberately and counterfactually attempted to paint Pius
> XII as antisemitic and pro-Hitler.  It's online at <
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article1400670.ece>.
>
> Comments?  In particular, how much credibility should be reasonably
> ascribed to Mr. Pacepa?
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0016e65b62a63e0aac04715d40ab
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

So PU has made exactly three reverts in 24 hours in at least three differen=
t articles<br>Collaboration with Axis powers during WWII<br>Anti-Russian se=
ntiment<br>Nochnoy Dozor (group)<br><br>there might be others. The fact is =
that he hasn&#39;t broken 3RR on any of them. However,=A0 since he&#39;s do=
ing this on a group of related article and fence-hugging in each case clear=
ly indicates that he&#39;s edit warring, so this may be enough for a report=
.<br>
<br>I think most of us are ok in terms of reverts on these pages, though pr=
obably the standard accusations of &#39;tag-teaming&#39; will be made.<br><=
br>What do others think? Enough? Or too risky?<br><br>We could also throw i=
n some of the &quot;POINT&quot; edits he&#39;s been making recently.<br>
<br>Radek<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/8/17 Digwuren <span di=
r=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&=
gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px s=
olid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<div><br></div><div>some two years ago, Times Online has published an ar=
ticle, sourced apparently mostly to Ion Mihai Pacepa of what&#39;s probably=
 Securitate, claiming that KGB deliberately and counterfactually attempted =
to paint Pius XII as antisemitic and pro-Hitler. =A0It&#39;s online at &lt;=
<a href=3D"http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article140067=
0.ece" target=3D"_blank">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe=
/article1400670.ece</a>&gt;.</div>

<div><br></div><div>Comments? =A0In particular, how much credibility should=
 be reasonably ascribed to Mr. Pacepa?<br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>Andres S=
oolo<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e65b62a63e0aac04715d40ab--


--===============1034235987046878081==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1034235987046878081==--


