X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Aug 20 01:41:31 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A8C8AD6.6010800@post.pl>
References: <11335.22289.qm@web45103.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<25890ca0908190354y32a40545l26960cddcadfb379@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A8C8AD6.6010800@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:41:25 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0908191641h402c11d0s62c1cfac9f4b9cec@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: It was on Karasek and he got away with self-reverting
	his 4th - though it might have put some fear of God in him. He's not
	that active so he's not that much of the problem. I read through the
	Check User criteria and I don't think there's enough - basically the
	sock/anon has to continue being disruptive or be used to circumvent
	restrictions to apply. Since these are most likely socks of either
	Lokyz
	or MK and the sock didn't itself violate any policies, it doesn't really
	apply. I thought
	Jadran91<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jadran91&action=edit&redlink=1>might
	actually be Dr. Dan - playing "naive" and bolding names just as DD
	recently did at Krakow, supposedly "new" but quoting stuff from German
	Wiki and immediately finding the article on Ephesus (complete with the
	Greek alphabet spelling - it took me awhile to figure out how to do
	that) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Radek, should we report him?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8826463560198154272=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  It was on Karasek and he got away with self-reverting
	his 4th - though it might have put some fear of God in him. He's not
	that active so he's not that much of the problem. I read through the
	Check User criteria and I don't think there's enough - basically the
	sock/anon has to continue being disruptive or be used to circumvent
	restrictions to apply. Since these are most likely socks of either Lokyz
	or MK and the sock didn't itself violate any policies, it doesn't really
	apply. I thought
	Jadran91<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jadran91&action=edit&redlink=1>might
	actually be Dr. Dan - playing "naive" and bolding names just as DD
	recently did at Krakow, supposedly "new" but quoting stuff from German
	Wiki and immediately finding the article on Ephesus (complete with the
	Greek alphabet spelling - it took me awhile to figure out how to do
	that) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8826463560198154272==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b5dc05440020471872c18

--0016e65b5dc05440020471872c18
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It was on Karasek and he got away with self-reverting his 4th - though it
might have put some fear of God in him. He's not that active so he's not
that much of the problem.

I read through the Check User criteria and I don't think there's enough -
basically the sock/anon has to continue being disruptive or be used to
circumvent restrictions to apply. Since these are most likely socks of
either Lokyz or MK and the sock didn't itself violate any policies, it
doesn't really apply.
I thought Jadran91<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jadran91&action=edit&redlink=1>might
actually be Dr. Dan - playing "naive" and bolding names just as DD
recently did at Krakow, supposedly "new" but quoting stuff from German Wiki
and immediately finding the article on Ephesus (complete with the Greek
alphabet spelling - it took me awhile to figure out how to do that)

Radek

2009/8/19 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>

> radek szulga wrote:
> > I just filed it.
>
> What and where? Don't forget to give us links so we can monitor the
> situation.
>
> And no, I don't have much experience with sock investigations.
>
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--0016e65b5dc05440020471872c18
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It was on Karasek and he got away with self-reverting his 4th - though it m=
ight have put some fear of God in him. He&#39;s not that active so he&#39;s=
 not that much of the problem.<br><br>I read through the Check User criteri=
a and I don&#39;t think there&#39;s enough - basically the sock/anon has to=
 continue being disruptive or be used to circumvent restrictions to apply. =
Since these are most likely socks of either Lokyz or MK and the sock didn&#=
39;t itself violate any policies, it doesn&#39;t really apply.<br>
I thought <span class=3D"history-user"><a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w=
/index.php?title=3DUser:Jadran91&amp;action=3Dedit&amp;redlink=3D1" class=
=3D"new mw-userlink" title=3D"User:Jadran91 (page does not exist)">Jadran91=
</a> might actually be Dr. Dan - playing &quot;naive&quot; and bolding name=
s just as DD recently did at Krakow, supposedly &quot;new&quot; but quoting=
 stuff from German Wiki and immediately finding the article on </span><span=
 class=3D"comment">Ephesus</span> (complete with the Greek alphabet spellin=
g - it took me awhile to figure out how to do that)<br>
<br>Radek<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/8/19 Piotr Konieczny <span=
 dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_qu=
ote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0p=
t 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
radek szulga wrote:<br>
&gt; I just filed it.<br>
<br>
What and where? Don&#39;t forget to give us links so we can monitor the<br>
situation.<br>
<br>
And no, I don&#39;t have much experience with sock investigations.<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
<br>
--<br>
Piotr Konieczny<br>
<br>
&quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=
<br>
theory.&quot;<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e65b5dc05440020471872c18--


--===============8826463560198154272==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8826463560198154272==--


