X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  8 01:19:23 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0906071531n102e5748u8142b4308b2535ef@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0906060616s7dd20794o40b98d98be6687c8@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2A8B41.3040906@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0906061210i5b3cba4es59c1869b058921b5@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906061219l620351ccq74594183a3aa8eaf@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2B62C1.8000406@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0906070203x197fee29neb795943eb3f6202@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2C1D70.6050507@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0906071531n102e5748u8142b4308b2535ef@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 18:19:00 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906071619p4a65b22hdefac48108ef0a84@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I did my two reverts and probably should play it safe.
	I
	got to give his credit though - he's mastered the super annoying, hard
	to revert without doing whole sale, make lots of irritating small
	changes spread out among many consecutive edits, style of edit warring.
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Skapperod on the roll
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I did my two reverts and probably should play it safe. I
	got to give his credit though - he's mastered the super annoying, hard
	to revert without doing whole sale, make lots of irritating small
	changes spread out among many consecutive edits, style of edit warring.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I did my two reverts and probably should play it safe. I got to give
his credit though - he's mastered the super annoying, hard to revert
without doing whole sale, make lots of irritating small changes spread
out among many consecutive edits, style of edit warring.

Radek

2009/6/7 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>:
> Thanks Piotrus,
>
> As expected Skapperod has engaged right away with reverting. The city's o=
wn
> statements have been labeled by him as "bad source" and removed among oth=
er
> things. Btw-is he now within 3RR ?
>
> W dniu 7 czerwca 2009 22:05 u=BFytkownik Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
> napisa=B3:
>>
>> Molobo Molobo wrote:
>> > Ok I used the latest version of the Ko=B3obrzeg article. Added my prev=
ious
>> > changes which I mentioned. I added a sentence on XV and and XVI century
>> > with information of discrimination of local slavic population in trade
>> > and crafts.
>>
>> Seems good, I inserted it after some small changes.
>>
>> --
>> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
>> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here." =A0 =A0 |||
>> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
>> =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

