X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul 11 18:37:02 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <848790.6704.qm@web45107.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
References: <25890ca0907110652x50262100t4905f563a92bd416@mail.gmail.com>
	<848790.6704.qm@web45107.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:36:51 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0907110936g4d749368mf2e187af1506eb8c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 1.0
X-Spam_score_int: 10
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 18:19,
	Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>
	wrote: > This is TOTAL BS !!! > Yes it is. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM]
	=?utf-8?q?Sneaky_blanking_by_Skapperod_in_Ko=C5=82obrzeg_ar?=
	=?utf-8?q?ticle_=28IMPORTANT=29?=
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2892294424657399298=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.0
X-Spam_score_int: 10
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 18:19, Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>
	wrote: > This is TOTAL BS !!! > Yes it is. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2892294424657399298==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b3112b0c65046e70b2c9

--001636c5b3112b0c65046e70b2c9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 18:19, Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com> wrote:

> This is TOTAL BS !!!
>

Yes it is.


> Radek I will comment on it very soon. *All our members should get involved
> here*.
>

Let's not be too hasty.  The request is not put together too well; there's a
good chance it'll be rejected by an administrator who thinks it's "just
another of those silly Eastern European disputes".

I recommend that the development be closely watched, and if need be, we
should get involved over time, not all at once.

However, right now, only Radek has made a statement in his support.
 Somebody else should support him, too, to let the administrator who shows
up know that it is not a "People v. Radek" case.

If there's too much dramu, somebody like Thatcher might eventually be the
only administrator willing to take the thread.  Somebody who thinks he
should "do a lot of work" and then "sanction everybody who gave an evil eye
to the canary".  Ideally, it should look like an easy case of an obviously
frivolous complaint.  Ideally, a random passing-by administrator should not
be shied away from this thread, and should then hastily resolve it in favour
of Radek.  Alas, achieving that is nontrivial :-(

Of course, if Jehochman shows up, generating a lot of dramu might be the
safe approach.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5b3112b0c65046e70b2c9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 18:19, Jack <span dir=3D=
"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jacurek@yahoo.com">jacurek@yahoo.com</a>&gt;</s=
pan> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0"><tbody><tr><td vali=
gn=3D"top" style=3D"font:inherit"><div>This is TOTAL BS !!!</div></td></tr>=
</tbody></table></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes it is.</div><div><br><=
/div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-le=
ft:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0"><tbody><tr><td vali=
gn=3D"top" style=3D"font:inherit"><div><br><span style=3D"font-size:10pt">R=
adek I will comment on it very soon. <strong>All our members should get inv=
olved here</strong>.</span></div>
</td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Let&#39;s not be=
 too hasty. =C2=A0The request is not put together too well; there&#39;s a g=
ood chance it&#39;ll be rejected by an administrator who thinks it&#39;s &q=
uot;just another of those silly Eastern European disputes&quot;.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I recommend that the development be closely watched, an=
d if need be, we should get involved over time, not all at once.</div><div>=
<br></div><div>However, right now, only Radek has made a statement in his s=
upport. =C2=A0Somebody else should support him, too, to let the administrat=
or who shows up know that it is not a &quot;People v. Radek&quot; case.</di=
v>
<div><br></div><div>If there&#39;s too much dramu, somebody like Thatcher m=
ight eventually be the only administrator willing to take the thread. =C2=
=A0Somebody who thinks he should &quot;do a lot of work&quot; and then &quo=
t;sanction everybody who gave an evil eye to the canary&quot;. =C2=A0Ideall=
y, it should look like an easy case of an obviously frivolous complaint. =
=C2=A0Ideally, a random passing-by administrator should not be shied away f=
rom this thread, and should then hastily resolve it in favour of Radek. =C2=
=A0Alas, achieving that is nontrivial :-(</div>
<div><br></div><div>Of course, if Jehochman shows up, generating a lot of d=
ramu might be the safe approach.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres So=
olo<br>

--001636c5b3112b0c65046e70b2c9--


--===============2892294424657399298==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2892294424657399298==--


