X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 24 09:17:46 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A41D0F6.9070601@post.pl>
References: <be0.5d360a6b.3772dc2e@aol.com>
	<4f045a880906232114w3ff23eecq4003babb5cfb380e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A41BFE1.1040300@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906232322j75e49886l9c7e7f39b12c6b97@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906232356n35f5c1bdrde771cc61c3a4a5c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A41D0F6.9070601@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:10:19 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906240010u4c40a9cei99c2fef6b7212bfc@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I might not be able to do it in 24h - I'll try
	emailing
	Shelley. 2009/6/24 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>: > radek szulga
	wrote: >> Crap. I'm super busy today and will be gone all day and I
	can't pursue >> it. Can someone at least initiate the disucssion with
	Shelly or >> Thathcher? > > A little delay may be good here; I do think
	you should be the one to > start it by emailing Shelly as I noted
	previously. If you do so in 24h > or so, this shouldn't be an issue. > >
	> -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just
	works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia statistics
	discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Hello, Martin
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I might not be able to do it in 24h - I'll try emailing
	Shelley. 2009/6/24 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>: > radek szulga
	wrote: >> Crap. I'm super busy today and will be gone all day and I
	can't pursue >> it. Can someone at least initiate the disucssion with
	Shelly or >> Thathcher? > > A little delay may be good here; I do think
	you should be the one to > start it by emailing Shelly as I noted
	previously. If you do so in 24h > or so, this shouldn't be an issue. > >
	> -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just
	works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia statistics
	discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I might not be able to do it in 24h - I'll try emailing Shelley.

2009/6/24 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> radek szulga wrote:
>> Crap. I'm super busy today and will be gone all day and I can't pursue
>> it. Can someone at least initiate the disucssion with Shelly or
>> Thathcher?
>
> A little delay may be good here; I do think you should be the one to
> start it by emailing Shelly as I noted previously. If you do so in 24h
> or so, this shouldn't be an issue.
>
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

