X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Apr 24 21:24:12 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0904241213n2b02883ckd2d55bfc5c6a50f8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <866941.13488.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0904241213n2b02883ckd2d55bfc5c6a50f8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:24:00 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0904241224k530fcd63q3915593f71c59fa2@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I commented at ANI because no one else did. This will
	probably be ignored. I do not care that much. As long as I am
	personally
	concerned, Russavia is not that much of trouble since he mostly does
	technical edits and knows very little about anything. Offliner is
	actually worse; he inserts professionally cooked and published
	disinformation; and he is probaly a sock of LokiiT/Krawdawng or perhaps
	Igny, but I do not have any proof. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] GFDL
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8676157176958646537=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I commented at ANI because no one else did. This will
	probably be ignored. I do not care that much. As long as I am personally
	concerned, Russavia is not that much of trouble since he mostly does
	technical edits and knows very little about anything. Offliner is
	actually worse; he inserts professionally cooked and published
	disinformation; and he is probaly a sock of LokiiT/Krawdawng or perhaps
	Igny, but I do not have any proof. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0061]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8676157176958646537==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d646ed4db5d8046851f08d

--0016e6d646ed4db5d8046851f08d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 I commented at ANI because no one else did. This will probably be ignored.
I do not care that much. As long as I am personally concerned, Russavia is
not that much of trouble since he mostly does technical edits and knows very
little about anything. Offliner is actually worse; he inserts professionally
cooked and published disinformation; and he is probaly a sock of
LokiiT/Krawdawng or perhaps Igny, but I do not have any proof.

Andrei


On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 19:35, Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>> Even if the GFDL argument is bogus, we don't need to let the vulgus know
>> that, do we?
>
>
> It's worse than that.  If I attempted to explain it to this crowd, it would
> lead to nowhere.  On one hand, people who support this kind of bogosity tend
> to be avid supporters of urban legends (which is what this is).  On another
> hand, the resulting dramu would lead people's attention away from the topic
> at hand, which is Russavia.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0016e6d646ed4db5d8046851f08d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=A0I commented at ANI because no one else did. This will probably be ignore=
d.=A0 I do not care that much. As long as I am personally concerned, Russav=
ia is not that much of trouble since he mostly does technical edits and kno=
ws very little about anything. Offliner is actually worse; he inserts profe=
ssionally cooked and published disinformation; and he is probaly a sock of =
LokiiT/Krawdawng or perhaps Igny, but I do not have any proof.<br>
<br>Andrei=A0 <br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 a=
t 3:13 PM, Digwuren <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.=
com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt=
 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 19:35,=
 Christian Suciu <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:christiansuciu@yah=
oo.com" target=3D"_blank">christiansuciu@yahoo.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br=
><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204,=
 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

<table border=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"0"><tbody><tr><td styl=
e=3D"font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font=
-weight: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-size-adjus=
t: inherit; font-stretch: inherit;" valign=3D"top">
Even if the GFDL argument is bogus, we don&#39;t need to let the <span styl=
e=3D"font-style: italic;">vulgus</span> know that, do we?</td>
</tr></tbody></table></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>It&#39;s worse =
than that. =A0If I attempted to explain it to this crowd, it would lead to =
nowhere. =A0On one hand, people who support this kind of bogosity tend to b=
e avid supporters of urban legends (which is what this is). =A0On another h=
and, the resulting dramu would lead people&#39;s attention away from the to=
pic at hand, which is Russavia.</div>

<div><br></div><div>--=A0<br></div></div>Andres Soolo<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e6d646ed4db5d8046851f08d--


--===============8676157176958646537==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8676157176958646537==--


