X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun  3 23:56:47 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A26ED7C.80705@post.pl>
References: <4A2625B5.7010705@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906030113r295a1e3as1452b924a5f7a55f@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906031153u6f231517n51cd4e0f21aec4fb@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A26ED7C.80705@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:56:37 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906031456u415cb794w9908c88da07ac212@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yeah, I can file the one for Kurfurst as a sort of a
	test case. My main worry is that if I file these sooner or later,
	Sandstein, or some other involved admin, is going to decide that I need
	to be placed on notice too - and I like my (limited) "get out of jail
	free" card. It will also be interesting to see who shows up for
	Kurfurst
	(if Deacon makes a few more remarks and Matthead decides to chime it
	... ahhh, that'd be a trifecta). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Taking on Deacon
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yeah, I can file the one for Kurfurst as a sort of a
	test case. My main worry is that if I file these sooner or later,
	Sandstein, or some other involved admin, is going to decide that I need
	to be placed on notice too - and I like my (limited) "get out of jail
	free" card. It will also be interesting to see who shows up for Kurfurst
	(if Deacon makes a few more remarks and Matthead decides to chime it ...
	ahhh, that'd be a trifecta). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Yeah, I can file the one for Kurfurst as a sort of a test case. My
main worry is that if I file these sooner or later, Sandstein, or some
other involved admin, is going to decide that I need to be placed on
notice too - and I like my (limited) "get out of jail free" card.
It will also be interesting to see who shows up for Kurfurst (if
Deacon makes a few more remarks and Matthead decides to chime it ...
ahhh, that'd be a trifecta).

Radek

2009/6/3 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> radek szulga wrote:
>> I think his comments over at Jacurek's 3RR can also go into his case fil=
e.
>
> Indeed. I think Kurf=FCrst is another "loner", so per our latest anaysis
> it should be possible to deal with him officially. I suggest AE report
> and getting him on the "Dig's list" if he is not on it already.
>
> --
> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here." =A0 =A0 |||
> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
> =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

