X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jul 20 00:58:34 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A63A504.3070909@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:58:12 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Dawrinek is in trouble:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Darwinek_.28admin_edit_warring.29
	It's his own fault, and he admits as much in his email to me. I am
	tempted to say to him that if he hadn't abandoned our cause, he would be
	able to receive council and edit support, now... I don't know what to
	do. I am afraid that if I step in, I will tarnish my reputation along
	the lines of "Polish admins try to band together" and so on. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM]  Darwinek in trouble
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Dawrinek is in trouble:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Darwinek_.28admin_edit_warring.29
	It's his own fault, and he admits as much in his email to me. I am
	tempted to say to him that if he hadn't abandoned our cause, he would be
	able to receive council and edit support, now... I don't know what to
	do. I am afraid that if I step in, I will tarnish my reputation along
	the lines of "Polish admins try to band together" and so on. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Dawrinek is in trouble:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Darwinek_.28admin_edit_warring.29

It's his own fault, and he admits as much in his email to me. I am 
tempted to say to him that if he hadn't abandoned our cause, he would be 
able to receive council and edit support, now... I don't know what to 
do. I am afraid that if I step in, I will tarnish my reputation along 
the lines of "Polish admins try to band together" and so on.

To be frank, if one is stupid enough to block a user with whom one was 
edit warring... sigh.

Still, I decided to post there, a single abuse of a tool within years of 
good work should not be enough to strip anybody of adminship.

It may be interesting to see if any "oppose because of Piotrus" appears.

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

