X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 14 18:39:52 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A352855.8050906@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:41:57 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <960568.11005.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	<4f045a880906140403s72981b45rf4637171b9a02615@mail.gmail.com>	<6c9a05ec0906140435m2d05aaeaie9e2b51a864130a0@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0906140444n44fcff93n30f04a77ea3955cc@mail.gmail.com>	<c3b2b3db0906140700g752710adke6a57dbf9250c8f7@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0906140742h200f1a2bk7d266ba2df278d5d@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70906140746m3c83639cne6caa4f1e48a4e52@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6fb557d70906140746m3c83639cne6caa4f1e48a4e52@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote: > If 172 were
	puppet master ''Jacob Peters'', how come all those > checkusers failed
	to reveal him? Would a shameless stalinist troll > with not much of
	iontellect successfully play the role of some scholar > for a long
	time?
	No, my two cents, but you may want to try a specific > CU, of course.
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Mikkalai
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote: > If 172 were
	puppet master ''Jacob Peters'', how come all those > checkusers failed
	to reveal him? Would a shameless stalinist troll > with not much of
	iontellect successfully play the role of some scholar > for a long time?
	No, my two cents, but you may want to try a specific > CU, of course.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote:
> If 172 were puppet master  ''Jacob Peters'', how come all those
> checkusers failed to reveal him? Would a shameless stalinist troll
> with not much of iontellect successfully play the role of some scholar
> for a long time? No, my two cents, but you may want to try a specific
> CU, of course.

I don't think there is much connection between 172 and JP. Long time ago 
I cooperated with 172 on Polish-Soviet War and had a positive 
experience; I respect him, while acknowledging his background (he is a 
Russian emigree academic living on US East coast). As far as I know, 172 
is a reasonable editor of Russian background. This 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decommunization_in_Russia&diff=295113031&oldid=291631836) 
hardly proves that he is a commie sympathizer.

Remember - we are looking for trends, not exceptions/outliers). If you 
look hard enough, you may find edits by me that can be seen as 
pro-Soviet (heck, I wrote 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Brest_Fortress once, an article 
about a major Soviet propaganda-celebrated battle).

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

