X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun  5 22:09:59 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:09:48 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906051309n2ce2da9bq92d9304d77f07159@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.7
X-Spam_score_int: 7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi, it has become obvious Offliner is attempting to do
	the classic dogfight, except on many fronts at once. He's well-versed in
	the policies that are actually enforced, and at the current intensity, 
	the editwars can go on for a long time. This means, under the current
	conditions, this battle is not winnable. A better tactic is needed.
	[...] Content analysis details:   (0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] tactics re Offliner and PasswordUsername
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0147495589582053679=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.9
X-Spam_score_int: 19
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi, it has become obvious Offliner is attempting to do
	the classic dogfight, except on many fronts at once. He's well-versed in
	the policies that are actually enforced, and at the current intensity,
	the editwars can go on for a long time. This means, under the current
	conditions, this battle is not winnable. A better tactic is needed.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.9 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-0.2 BAYES_40               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40%
	[score: 0.2285]
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0147495589582053679==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b31171908c046b9f7941

--001636c5b31171908c046b9f7941
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,
it has become obvious Offliner  is attempting to do the classic dogfight,
except on many fronts at once.  He's well-versed in the policies that are
actually enforced, and at the current intensity, the editwars can go on for
a long time.  This means, under the current conditions, this battle is not
winnable.  A better tactic is needed.

One of the classic tactics involves overwhelming the opponent's revert
count.  To do this, we'd have to co=C3=B6rdinate at the level of determinin=
g a
day and consistently revert him (and the rest of the Cartel) until 3RR kick=
s
in.  The obvious downside is that a tight series of reverts such as this ha=
s
the risk of catching administrative attention, with all the consequent
risks.

How about we try to demonstrate consensus?  Straw polls seem to be the
easiest: they have less of a chance of degenerating into endless talk
sessions because they have a semi-formal format; they need less
co=C3=B6rdination, and I believe the Cartel's organisation is such that the=
 only
serious risk of losing such polls is when the Cartel can claim that Russia
is being cast in bad light.

In interest of practicing, I propose we start by holding a poll on whether
Latvia is to be included in [[Ethnocracy]].  This front doesn't involve
Offliner directly, the Cartel being represented by PasswordUsername and
Shotlandiya there, and it is probably hard to rally Russian patriots around
this topic, as Ethnocracy has not been a dog-whistle term in Russian
propaganda.  (I think it only became a battleground in the first place
because Petri Krohn noticed it.)

P. S.  I believe PasswordUsername is RJ CG, and I have strong suspicion tha=
t
RJ CG is not Roobit, after all.  I think I have expressed this suspicion
before, but I dropped it on-wiki because I was afraid that it might be
confirmed, leading to RJ CG's unblocking.  Unfortunately, I don't think I
can get SPI to accept the PU-RJ CG connection :-(

--=20
Andres Soolo

--001636c5b31171908c046b9f7941
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,<div><br></div><div>it has become obvious Offliner =C2=A0is attempting t=
o do the classic dogfight, except on many fronts at once. =C2=A0He&#39;s we=
ll-versed in the policies that are actually enforced, and at the current in=
tensity, the editwars can go on for a long time. =C2=A0This means, under th=
e current conditions, this battle is not winnable. =C2=A0A better tactic is=
 needed.</div>
<div><br></div><div>One of the classic tactics involves overwhelming the op=
ponent&#39;s revert count. =C2=A0To do this, we&#39;d have to co=C3=B6rdina=
te at the level of determining a day and consistently revert him (and the r=
est of the Cartel) until 3RR kicks in. =C2=A0The obvious downside is that a=
 tight series of reverts such as this has the risk of catching administrati=
ve attention, with all the consequent risks.</div>
<div><br></div><div>How about we try to demonstrate consensus? =C2=A0Straw =
polls seem to be the easiest: they have less of a chance of degenerating in=
to endless talk sessions because they have a semi-formal format; they need =
less co=C3=B6rdination, and I believe the Cartel&#39;s organisation is such=
 that the only serious risk of losing such polls is when the Cartel can cla=
im that Russia is being cast in bad light.</div>
<div><br></div><div>In interest of practicing, I propose we start by holdin=
g a poll on whether Latvia is to be included in [[Ethnocracy]]. =C2=A0This =
front doesn&#39;t involve Offliner directly, the Cartel being represented b=
y PasswordUsername and Shotlandiya there, and it is probably hard to rally =
Russian patriots around this topic, as Ethnocracy has not been a dog-whistl=
e term in Russian propaganda. =C2=A0(I think it only became a battleground =
in the first place because Petri Krohn noticed it.)</div>
<div><br></div><div>P. S. =C2=A0I believe PasswordUsername is RJ CG, and I =
have strong suspicion that RJ CG is not Roobit, after all. =C2=A0I think I =
have expressed this suspicion before, but I dropped it on-wiki because I wa=
s afraid that it might be confirmed, leading to RJ CG&#39;s unblocking. =C2=
=A0Unfortunately, I don&#39;t think I can get SPI to accept the PU-RJ CG co=
nnection :-(</div>
<div><br></div><div>--=C2=A0</div><div>Andres Soolo<br>
</div>

--001636c5b31171908c046b9f7941--


--===============0147495589582053679==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0147495589582053679==--


