X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jun 11 13:34:11 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c7c.4f7122d6.3761d731@aol.com>
References: <c7c.4f7122d6.3761d731@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:33:49 -0400
Message-ID: <6fb557d70906110433q34e77e4eg33a1129a2107e1f8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hmm,
	I know Tartu University scholars who edit Wikipedia
	from time to time, and a I once knew a receipient of numerous awards of
	the Republic of Estonia who made nasty attacks on Isamaaliit (not that
	I
	like that party, but his argumentation was thoroughly ignorant for a
	scholar). So that such an innovative person like Mark Ames might indeed
	try Wiki, esp. if Scott invited him after the dispute on the article of
	Esconomist. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] PasswordUsername, opportunity
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hmm, I know Tartu University scholars who edit Wikipedia
	from time to time, and a I once knew a receipient of numerous awards of
	the Republic of Estonia who made nasty attacks on Isamaaliit (not that I
	like that party, but his argumentation was thoroughly ignorant for a
	scholar). So that such an innovative person like Mark Ames might indeed
	try Wiki, esp. if Scott invited him after the dispute on the article of
	Esconomist. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Hmm, I know Tartu University scholars who edit Wikipedia from time to
time, and a I once knew a receipient of numerous awards of the
Republic of Estonia who made nasty attacks on Isamaaliit (not that I
like that party, but his argumentation was thoroughly ignorant for a
scholar). So that such an innovative person like Mark Ames might
indeed try Wiki, esp. if Scott invited him after the dispute on the
article of Esconomist.

M.

On 11/06/2009, PetersJV@aol.com <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/10/2009 11:20:45 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> wikibiophys@gmail.com writes:
>
> What he  actually does is the"divide and conquer"  strategy. Beyond mostly
> technical edits, he works against people (like you and me) by mobilizing
> other  people - some sympathetic administrators (like H.) and left-wing
> users.
> He  intentionally and skillfully creates conflicts from nothing. This
> strategy has  been exploited by KGB operatives who worked against
> "opposition"
> movements in  the former SU. This can be used by others as well.  The only
> tactics that  worked against people like PU: never talk with them about
> anything and avoid  any contacts with them. You can't get them into troub=
le.
> They
> will make a  trouble for you.
>
>
>
>
> I do get a sense PasswordUsername isn't in this just for their amusement.=
..
>  advice well taken. /Peters
> **************Dell Inspiron 15 Laptop: Now in 6 vibrant colors! Shop Dell=
=92s
> full line of laptops.
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222008777x1201444407/aol?redir=
=3Dhttp:%2F%2Fad.doubleclick.net%2Fclk%3B215566094%3B3786435
> 8%3Bv)
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

