X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Apr 28 06:26:57 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <739313.85820.qm@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: h4CFFXMVM1lDXp_6bY8YAMpY2H6271Yxo09URLP_JxY9CSgG9Oucs5eRGkjLxWpKri0sga6SVKZLwxPYU4rGE.jXSwJ6.zA0lgZErqJdQhZ2kWC8zS9vjrV6rPGPpKtifpz39sPAzU8Ma5yU7gpE4cHvU.skM36P_3m.JY.Si4vrhF.b.1S.f0tuFLwGOOWKrnwaLwrKo6b_rCKqK.i6xz0apIsgSnPjle.w4vKgpaxA5QJf2OyQvPqfL9Q1FXPar7UGodW9Mq2lxiiZfUNa9tG70OelM3BRsWONLEhfl2ySafsVBA--
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.2.19 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: 1.5
X-Spam_score_int: 15
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  OK, so no psychological warfare - I understand the
	message. It was a crazy idea conceived at 3 am when I should have been
	asleep. I just hope ArbCom doesn't receive that letter. In my defence, 
	it was only a notion that never advanced beyond a single message. Still,
	I find it outrageous (though not wholly unsurprising) that a
	dictatorship is perverting the encyclopedia to fit its propaganda
	message, and I hope the champions of neutrality eventually emerge
	triumphant. By the way, who else is using Wikipedia for propaganda? We
	know the CIA has edited, but I'm not sure what articles. How about the
	Chinese? I have a vague impression that there are some very pro-PRC
	editors, but also anti-Communist ones from Taiwan, Hong Kong & overseas.
	It would be interesting to compare how Russia and China differ in their
	approach to spreading propaganda on Wikipedia. Belarus might be another
	interesting case, especially as Lukashenka's relations with Russia cool.
	Venezuela and Iran probably have enough Western apologists not to have
	to worry about spending their own money for propaganda. And North
	Korea? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] China?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4773910895405218876=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.8
X-Spam_score_int: 28
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  OK, so no psychological warfare - I understand the
	message. It was a crazy idea conceived at 3 am when I should have been
	asleep. I just hope ArbCom doesn't receive that letter. In my defence,
	it was only a notion that never advanced beyond a single message. Still,
	I find it outrageous (though not wholly unsurprising) that a
	dictatorship is perverting the encyclopedia to fit its propaganda
	message, and I hope the champions of neutrality eventually emerge
	triumphant. By the way, who else is using Wikipedia for propaganda? We
	know the CIA has edited, but I'm not sure what articles. How about the
	Chinese? I have a vague impression that there are some very pro-PRC
	editors, but also anti-Communist ones from Taiwan, Hong Kong & overseas.
	It would be interesting to compare how Russia and China differ in their
	approach to spreading propaganda on Wikipedia. Belarus might be another
	interesting case, especially as Lukashenka's relations with Russia cool.
	Venezuela and Iran probably have enough Western apologists not to have
	to worry about spending their own money for propaganda. And North Korea?
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4714]
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============4773910895405218876==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1037685837-1240892797=:85820"


--0-1037685837-1240892797=:85820
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

OK, so no psychological warfare - I understand the message. It was a crazy idea conceived at 3 am when I should have been asleep. I just hope ArbCom doesn't receive that letter. In my defence, it was only a notion that never advanced beyond a single message.
Still, I find it outrageous (though not wholly unsurprising) that a dictatorship is perverting the encyclopedia to fit its propaganda message, and I hope the champions of neutrality eventually emerge triumphant.
By the way, who else is using Wikipedia for propaganda? We know the CIA has edited, but I'm not sure what articles. How about the Chinese? I have a vague impression that there are some very pro-PRC editors, but also anti-Communist ones from Taiwan, Hong Kong & overseas. It would be interesting to compare how Russia and China differ in their approach to spreading propaganda on Wikipedia.
Belarus might be another interesting case, especially as Lukashenka's relations with Russia cool. Venezuela and Iran probably have enough Western apologists not to have to worry about spending their own money for propaganda. And North Korea?


      
--0-1037685837-1240892797=:85820
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">OK, so no psychological warfare - I understand the message. It was a crazy idea conceived at 3 am when I should have been asleep. I just hope ArbCom doesn't receive that letter. In my defence, it was only a notion that never advanced beyond a single message.<div><br></div><div>Still, I find it outrageous (though not wholly unsurprising) that a dictatorship is perverting the encyclopedia to fit its propaganda message, and I hope the champions of neutrality eventually emerge triumphant.</div><div><br></div><div>By the way, who else is using Wikipedia for propaganda? We know the CIA has edited, but I'm not sure what articles. How about the Chinese? I have a vague impression that there are some very pro-PRC editors, but also anti-Communist ones from Taiwan, Hong Kong &amp; overseas. It would be interesting to compare how Russia and China differ in their approach to
 spreading propaganda on Wikipedia.</div><div><br></div><div>Belarus might be another interesting case, especially as Lukashenka's relations with Russia cool. Venezuela and Iran probably have enough Western apologists not to have to worry about spending their own money for propaganda. And North Korea?</div></td></tr></table><br>

      
--0-1037685837-1240892797=:85820--


--===============4773910895405218876==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4773910895405218876==--


