X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Apr 30 02:12:43 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0904291653k56483533wb5e268dbc52535@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d2a.4934ac18.372a3d71@aol.com>
	<929ed1ec0904291653k56483533wb5e268dbc52535@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:12:37 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880904291712n7e9a047emae575435ba12cb8b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yes, perhaps we could ignore if for a day or two, see
	what develops, if anything. On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:32,
	<PetersJV@aol.com> wrote: >> >> We have two options, become parties and
	not agree and let it die in >> protest, we're not doing this again (post
	links to all the prior actions)... > > At this time, I'm not convinced
	participation serves any meaningful purpose. > This may change, but
	based on current state of affairs, I won't rush into > declaring myself
	as a participant. > There's a considerable likelihood that MEDCOM might
	reject the whole case > due to the ARBCOM history. If this history of
	mediation and arbitration is > not made clear by Hiberniantears himself,
	it might have to be pointed out by > somebody else, but there's probably
	no need to rush with that, either. >> >> It may be worthwhile trying #1,
	that as a community, we are not going to >> let ourselves be dragged
	through the mud again. >> >> I'm open to suggestions. > > I'm hoping
	that Hiberniantears will manage to save face while giving up if > the
	mediation dies down without a lot of arguing. Dojarca can still cause >
	problems, so it might be worthwile to try and keep him away. If it was >
	Offliner, it could be done by shifting our focus to the South Ossetia >
	articles, but Dojarca doesn't seem to be very passionate about those. As
	> far as I can tell, his only recurring interests are Soviet occupation
	of > Baltics and ancient Soviet computers. > Perhaps, is there anything
	that can be done to improve the Chernobyl-related > articles? Its
	anniversary has just passed, it's Soviet-related, and it > involves
	blame. This might have a chance at attracting him. > -- > Andres Soolo
	>
	> > Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Here we go again, Baltic mediation
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yes, perhaps we could ignore if for a day or two, see
	what develops, if anything. On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:32,
	<PetersJV@aol.com> wrote: >> >> We have two options, become parties and
	not agree and let it die in >> protest, we're not doing this again (post
	links to all the prior actions)... > > At this time, I'm not convinced
	participation serves any meaningful purpose. > This may change, but
	based on current state of affairs, I won't rush into > declaring myself
	as a participant. > There's a considerable likelihood that MEDCOM might
	reject the whole case > due to the ARBCOM history. If this history of
	mediation and arbitration is > not made clear by Hiberniantears himself,
	it might have to be pointed out by > somebody else, but there's probably
	no need to rush with that, either. >> >> It may be worthwhile trying #1,
	that as a community, we are not going to >> let ourselves be dragged
	through the mud again. >> >> I'm open to suggestions. > > I'm hoping
	that Hiberniantears will manage to save face while giving up if > the
	mediation dies down without a lot of arguing. Dojarca can still cause >
	problems, so it might be worthwile to try and keep him away. If it was >
	Offliner, it could be done by shifting our focus to the South Ossetia >
	articles, but Dojarca doesn't seem to be very passionate about those. As
	> far as I can tell, his only recurring interests are Soviet occupation
	of > Baltics and ancient Soviet computers. > Perhaps, is there anything
	that can be done to improve the Chernobyl-related > articles? Its
	anniversary has just passed, it's Soviet-related, and it > involves
	blame. This might have a chance at attracting him. > -- > Andres Soolo >
	> > Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Yes, perhaps we could ignore if for a day or two, see what develops,
if anything.


On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:32, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> We have two options, become parties and not agree and let it die in
>> protest, we're not doing this again (post links to all the prior actions)...
>
> At this time, I'm not convinced participation serves any meaningful purpose.
>  This may change, but based on current state of affairs, I won't rush into
> declaring myself as a participant.
> There's a considerable likelihood that MEDCOM might reject the whole case
> due to the ARBCOM history.  If this history of mediation and arbitration is
> not made clear by Hiberniantears himself, it might have to be pointed out by
> somebody else, but there's probably no need to rush with that, either.
>>
>> It may be worthwhile trying #1, that as a community, we are not going to
>> let ourselves be dragged through the mud again.
>>
>> I'm open to suggestions.
>
> I'm hoping that Hiberniantears will manage to save face while giving up if
> the mediation dies down without a lot of arguing.  Dojarca can still cause
> problems, so it might be worthwile to try and keep him away. If it was
> Offliner, it could be done by shifting our focus to the South Ossetia
> articles, but Dojarca doesn't seem to be very passionate about those.  As
> far as I can tell, his only recurring interests are Soviet occupation of
> Baltics and ancient Soviet computers.
> Perhaps, is there anything that can be done to improve the Chernobyl-related
> articles?  Its anniversary has just passed, it's Soviet-related, and it
> involves blame.  This might have a chance at attracting him.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

