X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Aug 22 11:04:50 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0908211537s5f6dac71pc2e2a599db58a0a3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0908211537s5f6dac71pc2e2a599db58a0a3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:04:37 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0908220204v42e0c5d2xd255d9c576a120b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 01:37, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh yeah, one more thing. Since I won't be
	able to do it tomorrow and since > that's when the expiration on
	"Expulsions of Germans" expires and since it's > unlikely that Todd
	(who
	seems like a really sketchy admin) will remove the > article protection
	earlier, it'd be good if someone (Jacurek?) put back the > info on Heinz
	Nawratil back into it, with an explanation "see talk, see > BLPN" - if
	it gets removed, don't edit war about it, let them/Skapperod > remove it
	and just raise the issue at talk again. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] leaving - part 2
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6965698270496650977=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 01:37, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh yeah, one more thing. Since I won't be
	able to do it tomorrow and since > that's when the expiration on
	"Expulsions of Germans" expires and since it's > unlikely that Todd (who
	seems like a really sketchy admin) will remove the > article protection
	earlier, it'd be good if someone (Jacurek?) put back the > info on Heinz
	Nawratil back into it, with an explanation "see talk, see > BLPN" - if
	it gets removed, don't edit war about it, let them/Skapperod > remove it
	and just raise the issue at talk again. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6965698270496650977==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368324b2336a800471b74686

--0016368324b2336a800471b74686
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 01:37, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh yeah, one more thing. Since I won't be able to do it tomorrow and since
> that's when the expiration on "Expulsions of Germans" expires and since it's
> unlikely that Todd (who seems like a really sketchy admin) will remove the
> article protection earlier, it'd be good if someone (Jacurek?) put back the
> info on Heinz Nawratil back into it, with an explanation "see talk, see
> BLPN" - if it gets removed, don't edit war about it, let them/Skapperod
> remove it and just raise the issue at talk again.


Jacurek was involved in an accident and won't probably be around in several
days.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016368324b2336a800471b74686
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 01:37, radek szulga <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rsszulga@gmail.com<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:=
0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Oh yeah, one more thing. Since I won&#39;t be able to do it tomorrow and si=
nce that&#39;s when the expiration on &quot;Expulsions of Germans&quot; exp=
ires and since it&#39;s unlikely that Todd (who seems like a really sketchy=
 admin) will remove the article protection earlier, it&#39;d be good if som=
eone (Jacurek?) put back the info on Heinz Nawratil back into it, with an e=
xplanation &quot;see talk, see BLPN&quot; - if it gets removed, don&#39;t e=
dit war about it, let them/Skapperod remove it and just raise the issue at =
talk again.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Jacurek was involved in an accident and won&#39;t proba=
bly be around in several days.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Sool=
o<br>

--0016368324b2336a800471b74686--


--===============6965698270496650977==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6965698270496650977==--


