X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 17 20:11:47 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A39325D.30604@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:13:49 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <c01.621704bd.3769b4ef@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <c01.621704bd.3769b4ef@aol.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: PetersJV@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 6/16/2009
	9:12:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > martint20@gmail.com writes: > > I
	think Digwuren's message was reasonable, and the fact that PU > deleted
	it with ??? in his edit comment is extra evidence of >
	WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, so it is all good. > > I hope we've saved that diff
	somewhere. If only it had been WTF? instead > of ??? :-) Peters [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] "reaching out" to PU
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  PetersJV@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 6/16/2009
	9:12:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > martint20@gmail.com writes: > > I
	think Digwuren's message was reasonable, and the fact that PU > deleted
	it with ??? in his edit comment is extra evidence of >
	WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, so it is all good. > > I hope we've saved that diff
	somewhere. If only it had been WTF? instead > of ??? :-) Peters [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

PetersJV@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 6/16/2009 9:12:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
> martint20@gmail.com writes:
> 
>     I think Digwuren's message was reasonable, and the fact that PU
>     deleted it with ??? in his edit comment is extra evidence of
>     WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, so it is all good.
> 
> I hope we've saved that diff somewhere. If only it had been WTF? instead 
> of ??? :-) Peters

I suggest you keep blackbooks like I did on some low key wikis. I used 
to have my blackbook on pl wiki, now I moved it elsewhere in the giant 
Wikimedia space (sorry Dig, but until wikipedometer wiki runs MediaWiki 
I just don't have the will and time to convert things). Until we have a 
secure mediawiki we shouldn't really edit it collaboratively (this could 
  reveal the cabal's existence) but for personal data collection, it is 
a good trick.

A key point is to put your text in <!-- --> so that it is invisible and 
ungooglable. Also make sure to have edit summaries to avoid plain 
diffs/comments showing in automatic edit summaries. Good places to do so 
are one's own talk pages or user pages or subpages.

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

