X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jun 18 21:57:54 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:57:42 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0906181257q5ee1749ap4872a277af9b7a6f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Igny was already listed in the log of warnings for
	your
	case (by Tiptoety). I am not sure if you or others should comment,
	unless you have very good diffs to present. What I did was an
	experiment. There are two possible outcomes: (1) all of that is
	dismissed as content dispute and bickering, and (2) Offliner and me are
	restricted. In the case of latter scenario, I would probably submit new
	AE requests about Russavia, Igny, PU, and BF4, unless you advise that
	something else would be better. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7970015521155641063=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Igny was already listed in the log of warnings for your
	case (by Tiptoety). I am not sure if you or others should comment,
	unless you have very good diffs to present. What I did was an
	experiment. There are two possible outcomes: (1) all of that is
	dismissed as content dispute and bickering, and (2) Offliner and me are
	restricted. In the case of latter scenario, I would probably submit new
	AE requests about Russavia, Igny, PU, and BF4, unless you advise that
	something else would be better. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7970015521155641063==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d348a01a2d88046ca4d241

--001636d348a01a2d88046ca4d241
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Igny was already listed in the log of warnings for your case (by Tiptoety).
I am not sure if you or others should comment, unless you  have very good
diffs to present.

What I did was an experiment. There are two possible outcomes: (1) all of
that is dismissed as content dispute and bickering, and (2) Offliner and me
are restricted. In the case of latter scenario, I would probably submit new
AE requests about Russavia, Igny, PU, and BF4, unless you advise that
something else would be better.

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I reported him to AE. Everyone is welcome to add more diffs.
>
>
> Igny showed up and claimed Offliner has been harassed by a long list of
> editors.  Is it appropriate for me to insist that he withdraw the baseless
> accusations?  Perhaps, it would be more profitable for somebody else to
> imply that when everybody is against Offliner, Offliner is more likely to be
> at fault?
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--001636d348a01a2d88046ca4d241
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Igny was already listed in the log of warnings for your case (by Tiptoety).=
 I am not sure if you or others should comment, unless you=A0 have very goo=
d diffs to present.<br><br>What I did was an experiment. There are two poss=
ible outcomes: (1) all of that is dismissed as content dispute and bickerin=
g, and (2) Offliner and me are restricted. In the case of latter scenario, =
I would probably submit new AE requests about Russavia, Igny, PU, and BF4, =
unless you advise that something else would be better.<br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Digwuren <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.co=
m</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"borde=
r-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-le=
ft: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei Dombay <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com" target=3D"_blan=
k">wikibiophys@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmai=
l_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0p=
t 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

I reported him to AE. Everyone is welcome to add more diffs.</blockquote><d=
iv><br>Igny showed up and claimed Offliner has been harassed by a long list=
 of editors.=A0 Is it appropriate for me to insist that he withdraw the bas=
eless accusations?=A0 Perhaps, it would be more profitable for somebody els=
e to imply that when everybody is against Offliner, Offliner is more likely=
 to be at fault?<br>

</div></div><br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--001636d348a01a2d88046ca4d241--


--===============7970015521155641063==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7970015521155641063==--


