X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 22 00:31:13 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211522t16b93620r8ff75fc90b7ac43@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906211423x2123ead9v1da04a5fa7e3242c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211428y5ea28c88wafdde68863c6a2bd@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211430n74ede828t87898697dbadcaa0@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211432i395bb0d1v4ace9d2f4da52cc4@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211438u405219b9se5a775761f8b8a7e@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211441w1782cb63x753f942d98d167bb@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211507t40b06546n96fa2e485f48ec5@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211511v542ad8dj252f7043e6eb1bb8@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211522t16b93620r8ff75fc90b7ac43@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:31:10 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211531w4fc9a4d0v22662eb8d7c3d0be@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Posted, at Newyorkbard's. Radek 2009/6/21 Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:11, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Here's the text I wrote up for AGK's
	talk page but it can be easily >> adopted for Tiptoety or another
	admin's (appropriate venue?): > > This seems to fit Newyorkbrad just
	fine. He's active, too. > It's generally accepted that questions may be
	posed to multiple people at > once, but this one appears to be a bit
	long for this tactic. > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia statistics
	discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Posted, at Newyorkbard's. Radek 2009/6/21 Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:11, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Here's the text I wrote up for AGK's
	talk page but it can be easily >> adopted for Tiptoety or another
	admin's (appropriate venue?): > > This seems to fit Newyorkbrad just
	fine. He's active, too. > It's generally accepted that questions may be
	posed to multiple people at > once, but this one appears to be a bit
	long for this tactic. > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia statistics
	discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Posted, at Newyorkbard's.

Radek


2009/6/21 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:11, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here's the text =A0I wrote up for =A0AGK's =A0talk page but it can be ea=
sily
>> adopted for Tiptoety or another admin's (appropriate venue?):
>
> This seems to fit Newyorkbrad just fine. =A0He's active, too.
> It's generally accepted that questions may be posed to multiple people at
> once, but this one appears to be a bit long for this tactic.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

