X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  9 05:57:46 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <23437.934.qm@web32808.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: Ad30RBAVM1kryKLkaois31uCCWTVS.A_v3TmZ2K.CJ0iMAMiZqglMe6I4Is7nEfwCJVJOluoMMiKWyIlY7LSqdJIYA5ECphzcCDZEWp_Bi3tgPZB7jmF0JsyVLHaHfqrarOUJzJazVxpom9WURB9bVdg2fhYxZyKTjWQeJqMNfYihOMOL_Qa1X6dYcexApSuyW68hdUtp1TImYMIhqkvwcqg44lpZb66uDcMBBszivoRgNpleiITb3qFwk5V2rqYDq6DdB.d41RXiDMAQNeF_g0PyQug4v1PzTKzc8KUyGmoqy5FQp4Jh.iOo1ghQ1bPGS8kAmf_r9XOQRc-
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.4.12 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 20:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yeah Molobo, I have the same impression. Anyway,
	I would
	not be surprised that Deacon has some Polish blood in his veins, and he
	does not even know about it. A number of Scottish women were
	voluntarily
	impregnated by Polish soldiers stationed in Scotland in 1940 - 1944. I
	know it from stories of some of these soldiers, now in their 80s (just a
	little off-topic remark). Tymek [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking on Deacon)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4865124135481495427=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.6
X-Spam_score_int: 6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yeah Molobo, I have the same impression. Anyway, I would
	not be surprised that Deacon has some Polish blood in his veins, and he
	does not even know about it. A number of Scottish women were voluntarily
	impregnated by Polish soldiers stationed in Scotland in 1940 - 1944. I
	know it from stories of some of these soldiers, now in their 80s (just a
	little off-topic remark). Tymek [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	1.1 MIME_HTML_MOSTLY       BODY: Multipart message mostly text/html MIME
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============4865124135481495427==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2105495144-1244519850=:934"


--0-2105495144-1244519850=:934
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yeah Molobo, I have the same impression. Anyway, I would not be surprised t=
hat Deacon has some Polish blood in his veins, and he does not even know ab=
out it. A number of Scottish women were voluntarily impregnated by Polish s=
oldiers stationed in Scotland in 1940 - 1944. I know it from stories of som=
e of these soldiers, now in their 80s (just a little off-topic remark).=A0
Tymek

--- On Mon, 6/8/09, Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> wrote:


From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking on Deacon)
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009, 5:23 PM


As far as I know and what I have assembled Deacon is a Scottish student. I =
would guess his antipolish-sentiment and pro-russian believes are based on =
partially pro-socialistic views(that are hostile to Poland due to Polish ro=
le in fighting communism) combined with personal experience with Polish peo=
ple.


2009/6/8 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>


piotr micula wrote:
> Piotrus, do you have any diffs to prove our point against Deacon? If you
> do, please share them here.

This is my up-to-date evidence list against Deacon:

* stalking by D

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Eastern_European_disputes/Evidence#Tag_t=
eam_1:_Russian

* February 4 and 5, 2009 at AE:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D268589325],
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D268735675]

*February 25, 2009 at article discussion:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk%3AHolocaust_in_Lithuania&=
diff=3D273253643&oldid=3D273250888]

*February:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Requests_for_arbitra=
tion&oldid=3D270472942#Request_for_clarification:_Wikipedia:Requests_for_ar=
bitration.2FEastern_European_disputes]
an ArbCom clarification request, in which Deacon tries to portray may
normal administrative actions as some sort of wrongdoing, again. To
quote from Coren: "what I see is a 3RR report that was closed
uncontroversially and properly (and which nobody contests on its face,
for that matter), and a thread on AE that attempts to rely on a tenuous
possible conflict of interest to invoke sanctions according to a
particularily imaginative reading of a remedy which was swiftly (and
correctly) closed as unactionable. It is impossible, in this context, to
see this request as little more than forum shopping; and an attempt to
misuse the committee into a bludgeon in a vendetta." But Deacon didn't
even get a warning.

*April 3 and 4, 2009 at article and policy space:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DBattle_of_Vilnius_%281655%29&d=
iff=3D281534126&oldid=3D281530841
move], and when at talk
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Battle_of_Vilnius_(1655)&=
diff=3D281724660&oldid=3D281724299
I cite a naming policy in support of a version],
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3ANaming_conventions=
_%28geographic_names%29&diff=3D281729338&oldid=3D281533853
he changes the estabilished policy]! (he does so again on
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Naming_conventions_(=
geographic_names)&diff=3D282447250&oldid=3D282446029
April 7] and
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3ANaming_conventions=
_%28geographic_names%29&diff=3D282811646&oldid=3D282716398
on April 9], then responds with
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Battle_of_Vilnius_(1655)&=
diff=3D281729768&oldid=3D281729093
personal remarks on talk] (also
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Battle_of_Vilnius_(1655)&=
diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D281848806
here]) and misrepresents the case at
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D281718073
WP:ANI] criticizing Polish editors, then launches a clear personal
attack:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D281909360
"Piotrus, partizan campaigning with personal attacks and straw men on
AN/I is not likely to produce any results for you"], and another one:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D281996850
"I honestly can't see any useful purpose to your participation in this
thread except as partizan campaigning; unless that is stacking up Polish
votes to to Polonise the name of the Lithuanian capital has nothing to
do with nationalism."]

Please note that Deacon refuses to answer how he became aware of my edit
to this orphaned article
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzi=
m&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D282009689]).

*previous attempts at dispute resolution:
[[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Bad_faith_towards_me\Wikiquette alerts]]
(April 5): I've asked Deacon to apologize for his uncivil remarks
towards me; he instead
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&=
diff=3D282002372&oldid=3D281998868
repeats them and adds new ones]: "You then joined in with straw men and
personal attacks... I've been very moderate about using the "N word" in
the context of Piotrus' campaign to change the name of a Lithuanian city
to a Polish spelling... Piotrus, please stop with the frivolous
forum-shopping and please let a "debate" remain a debate without trying
to escalate it into a dispute". He also accused me of "disrupting ANI",
=A0making
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&=
diff=3D282006059&oldid=3D282005792
personal attacks] towards him (I dearly invite anybody to read the post
in his diff and try to find any personal attack there) and of
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D282006979
nationalist POV]
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_n=
oticeboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D282007762
also here]). His final comment at wikiquette indicated no good will
towards dispute resolution:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&di=
ff=3Dprev&oldid=3D282007379
"The phoney indignation is boring, and nothing's gonna happen here.
Please just stop all this drama-mongering"]. --~~~~

*April 6: as he has done in the past, Deacon appears immediately in a
thread I opened at AE, even through it doesn't concern him at all, to
defend an editor I complained about:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_=
noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282216930&oldid=3D282211595]
; he there accuses me of "forum-shopping", and categorizes those who
disagree with the editor I disagree with as "tendentious multi-blocked
nationalists trolls". Next, he makes an unbacked personal attack at
another Polish user, Radeksz ("he (Dr. Dan) is not by any means half as
problematic a user as, for instance, User:Radeksz whom Piotrus has gone
to a lot of trouble to protect"). He then hijacks the AE request by
posting obsolete (last arbcom) evidence against Radeksz:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282236979&oldid=3D282232264].
=A0 Note that he uses evidence and claims from the rejected arbitration
clarification request to smear my and Radeksz name.
Third 3RR violation: Piotrus closes the issue himself to avoid a block"
and so on. Note also that
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282237414&oldid=3D282237165
he moves Radeksz post] like he did with mine earlier, with potentially
confusing results. When I attempted to structure the discussion, he
reverted me with an uncivil edit summary
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27=
_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282275525&oldid=3D282275111])=
.
Subsequently, a neutral admin reviewing this case
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3ADeacon_of_Pndapetz=
im&diff=3D282278967&oldid=3D282277765
supported my edit], as
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282288194&oldid=3D282287798
did another].

*April 7:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_talk:Requested_moves=
&diff=3D282445068&oldid=3D282443991
Deacon presents an analysis of vote], dividing users into ethnic camps,
with bad faith assumptions "long term ally of certain users", "(followed
user X and opposed him". Notably, the bad faith assumptions are limited
to the users opposing him; and the ethnic analysis is twisted - in an
attempt to show how Poles outvote Lithuanians, Lithuanian users agreeing
with Deacon and living in US are shown as Americans
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_talk%3ARequested_mo=
ves&diff=3D282579954&oldid=3D282504996]),
but Poles living in US are, well, Poles...

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27=
_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282467288&oldid=3D282463214
more bad faith and slander]: "the four users are all your normal
tag-team partners I'd expect to turn up here....", "It's no secret that
I am one of many many users who have had a problem with much of your
behaviour Piotrus," "The long old ad hominems you've been in the habit
of launching against me and any one else whenever they try to ensure a
fair hearing for one of your ideological "opponents" won't make your
"evidence" against this one any stronger"

*stalking:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_talk%3ARequested_mov=
es&diff=3D282436896&oldid=3D282435103
Deacon appears on a Wikipedia page and answers my question, defending a
disruptive user]

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27=
_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282618987&oldid=3D282609281]:
Deacon misrepresents the arbcom case, accuses me of "edit-warring in
with poorly-sourced nationalistic nonsense against consensus," (and also
slanders other editors: "no-one's gonna care, as most of the AE admins
have done much worse"). He repeats claims from last ArbCom that were
dismissed by arbcom (but were not clearly rejected, so as I predicted,
all the accusations will get repeated on an on): "user who spends much
of his wiki-time IMing with notorious nationalist edit-warriors (like
Alden Jones...)", "That the editors who've joined you here are your
normal tag-teamers"

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3ASandstein&diff=3D=
282633373&oldid=3D282633058]:
here Deacon appears on talk page to defend an editor that offended me
and slanders me again: "it's rather saintly compared with much of the
stuff... Piotrus' allies say but never gets reported...

* April 9: Accusing other editors:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Jogaila&diff=3D282714988&=
oldid=3D282714688
of nationalism]

*May 21: just few days after returning from his 1-month wikibreak,
Deacon becomes involved in a SPI case involving a Polish user, and
becomes the only non-SPI/CU/ArbCom official to see the "secret evidence"
in this case:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Sockpuppet_investiga=
tions/Molobo&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D291375384].
Requests from other non-SPI/CU/ArbCom editors to obtain this evidence,
and to ask why Deacon obtained this evidence, are ignored or rejected.

*May 31:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_=
noticeboard&diff=3D293606105&oldid=3D293602145
bad faith against Polish users in general and Piotrus in particular]

*June 2:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3AAvraham&diff=3D294=
030252&oldid=3D294029001
Bad faith, PA against me]

*June 3:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=3D294165024&oldid=3D294163865
bad faith], note
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=3D294193718&oldid=3D294184461
that an editor was offended]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzi=
m&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D294155101
refusal to discuss his behavior]

*June 5:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzi=
m&diff=3D294456430&oldid=3D294450386
refuses mediation, assumes bad faith]

*June 8:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Jacurek&diff=3Dprev&=
oldid=3D295013000
abuse of admin powers]
*June 8:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim=
&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D295082429
refusal to discuss the issues, removing any criticism as "slanderous
personal attacks"] and
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim=
&diff=3D295112666&oldid=3D295112174
closing the discussion]
*June 8:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim=
&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D295086772
bad faith towards administrative actions of others]
*June 8:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27=
_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=3D295085030&oldid=3D295084717

accusing an editor of being "a hard-core edit warrior"]
*June 8: more bad faith and PAs:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests=
/Enforcement&diff=3D295190903&oldid=3D295190539
I would ask however that Radeksz is added to the Diguren case. He
appears to be a one-purpose nationalist account who does nothing on
wikipedia but edit-war against German and Lithuanian users (mainly
German users), and then go shopping against them.]
*June 8:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests=
/Enforcement&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D295205955
bad faith: "Poland-Lithuania-Russia axis"... clear dislike users in this
area have towards me]
*June 8:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests=
/Enforcement&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D295218878
bad faith towards others, characterizing his opponents as "battlers"]
*June 8:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests=
/Enforcement&diff=3D295226926&oldid=3D295226895
more ofthe above: "satisfaction of the fictional anti-Polishness
conveniently manufactured by the tendentious swarm above"]




--
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=
 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here." =A0 =A0 |||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
=A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
=0A=0A=0A      
--0-2105495144-1244519850=:934
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;"><DIV>Yeah Molobo, I have the same impression.=
 Anyway, I would not be surprised that Deacon has some Polish blood in his =
veins, and he does not even know about it. A number of Scottish women were =
voluntarily impregnated by Polish soldiers stationed in Scotland in 1940 - =
1944. I know it from stories of some of these soldiers, now in their 80s (j=
ust a little off-topic remark).&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Tymek<BR><BR>--- On <B>Mon, 6/8/09, Molobo Molobo <I>&lt;molobus@gmail=
.com&gt;</I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(=
16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: Molobo Molobo &lt;molobus@gmail.com&gt;<BR>=
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking on Deacon)<BR>To: "W=
ikipedia statistics" &lt;folks@wikipedometer.net&gt;<BR>Date: Monday, June =
8, 2009, 5:23 PM<BR><BR>
<DIV id=3Dyiv1477750513>As far as I know and what I have assembled Deacon i=
s a Scottish student. I would guess his antipolish-sentiment and pro-russia=
n believes are based on partially pro-socialistic views(that are hostile to=
 Poland due to Polish role in fighting communism) combined with personal ex=
perience with Polish people.<BR><BR>
<DIV class=3Dgmail_quote>2009/6/8 Piotr Konieczny <SPAN dir=3Dltr>&lt;pioko=
n@post.pl&gt;</SPAN><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dgmail_quote style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt=
 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">
<DIV class=3Dim>piotr micula wrote:<BR>&gt; Piotrus, do you have any diffs =
to prove our point against Deacon? If you<BR>&gt; do, please share them her=
e.<BR><BR></DIV>This is my up-to-date evidence list against Deacon:<BR><BR>=
* stalking by D<BR><BR>Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Eastern_European_=
disputes/Evidence#Tag_team_1:_Russian<BR><BR>* February 4 and 5, 2009 at AE=
:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Admi=
nistrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=
=3D268589325" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/inde=
x.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforceme=
nt&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D268589325</A>],<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wik=
ipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbi=
tration_enforcement&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D268735675" target=3D_blank
 rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Admin=
istrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=
=3D268735675</A>]<BR><BR>*February 25, 2009 at article discussion:<BR>[<A h=
ref=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk%3AHolocaust_in_Lith=
uania&amp;diff=3D273253643&amp;oldid=3D273250888" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnof=
ollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk%3AHolocaust_in_Lithu=
ania&amp;diff=3D273253643&amp;oldid=3D273250888</A>]<BR><BR>*February:<BR>[=
<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Requests_f=
or_arbitration&amp;oldid=3D270472942#Request_for_clarification:_Wikipedia:R=
equests_for_arbitration.2FEastern_European_disputes" target=3D_blank rel=3D=
nofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Requests_for=
_arbitration&amp;oldid=3D270472942#Request_for_clarification:_Wikipedia:Req=
uests_for_arbitration.2FEastern_European_disputes</A>]<BR>an ArbCom clarifi=
cation request, in which Deacon
 tries to portray may<BR>normal administrative actions as some sort of wron=
gdoing, again. To<BR>quote from Coren: "what I see is a 3RR report that was=
 closed<BR>uncontroversially and properly (and which nobody contests on its=
 face,<BR>for that matter), and a thread on AE that attempts to rely on a t=
enuous<BR>possible conflict of interest to invoke sanctions according to a<=
BR>particularily imaginative reading of a remedy which was swiftly (and<BR>=
correctly) closed as unactionable. It is impossible, in this context, to<BR=
>see this request as little more than forum shopping; and an attempt to<BR>=
misuse the committee into a bludgeon in a vendetta." But Deacon didn't<BR>e=
ven get a warning.<BR><BR>*April 3 and 4, 2009 at article and policy space:=
<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DBattle_of_Vilni=
us_%281655%29&amp;diff=3D281534126&amp;oldid=3D281530841" target=3D_blank
 rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DBattle_of_Vilni=
us_%281655%29&amp;diff=3D281534126&amp;oldid=3D281530841</A><BR>move], and =
when at talk<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTal=
k:Battle_of_Vilnius_%281655%29&amp;diff=3D281724660&amp;oldid=3D281724299" =
target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3D=
Talk:Battle_of_Vilnius_(1655)&amp;diff=3D281724660&amp;oldid=3D281724299</A=
><BR>I cite a naming policy in support of a version],<BR>[<A href=3D"http:/=
/en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3ANaming_conventions_%28geo=
graphic_names%29&amp;diff=3D281729338&amp;oldid=3D281533853" target=3D_blan=
k rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3ANa=
ming_conventions_%28geographic_names%29&amp;diff=3D281729338&amp;oldid=3D28=
1533853</A><BR>he changes the estabilished policy]! (he does so again on<BR=
>[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Naming_conve=
ntions_%28geographic_names%29&amp;diff=3D282447250&amp;oldid=3D282446029" t=
arget=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DW=
ikipedia:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)&amp;diff=3D282447250&amp;old=
id=3D282446029</A><BR>April 7] and<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w=
/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3ANaming_conventions_%28geographic_names%29&am=
p;diff=3D282811646&amp;oldid=3D282716398" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>ht=
tp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3ANaming_conventions_%2=
8geographic_names%29&amp;diff=3D282811646&amp;oldid=3D282716398</A><BR>on A=
pril 9], then responds with<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.=
php?title=3DTalk:Battle_of_Vilnius_%281655%29&amp;diff=3D281729768&amp;oldi=
d=3D281729093" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/ind=
ex.php?title=3DTalk:Battle_of_Vilnius_(1655)&amp;diff=3D281729768&amp;oldid=
=3D281729093</A><BR>personal remarks on talk]
 (also<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Batt=
le_of_Vilnius_%281655%29&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281848806" target=3D_b=
lank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Battle=
_of_Vilnius_(1655)&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281848806</A><BR>here]) and =
misrepresents the case at<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph=
p?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev=
&amp;oldid=3D281718073" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.=
org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&a=
mp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281718073</A><BR>WP:ANI] criticizing Polish edit=
ors, then launches a clear personal<BR>attack:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wik=
ipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Inci=
dents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281909360" target=3D_blank
 rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Admin=
istrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281909360</A=
><BR>"Piotrus, partizan campaigning with personal attacks and straw men on<=
BR>AN/I is not likely to produce any results for you"], and another one:<BR=
>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administ=
rators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281996850" targ=
et=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWiki=
pedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D2=
81996850</A><BR>"I honestly can't see any useful purpose to your participat=
ion in this<BR>thread except as partizan campaigning; unless that is stacki=
ng up Polish<BR>votes to to Polonise the name of the Lithuanian capital has=
 nothing to<BR>do with nationalism."]<BR><BR>Please note that Deacon refuse=
s to answer how he became aware of my edit<BR>to this orphaned article<BR>(=
[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pn=
dapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D282009689%5D" target=3D_blank rel=3Dno=
follow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pnda=
petzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D282009689]</A>).<BR><BR>*previous attemp=
ts at dispute resolution:<BR>[[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Bad_faith_toward=
s_me\Wikiquette alerts]]<BR>(April 5): I've asked Deacon to apologize for h=
is uncivil remarks<BR>towards me; he instead<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikip=
edia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&amp;diff=3D28200=
2372&amp;oldid=3D281998868" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipe=
dia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&amp;diff=3D282002=
372&amp;oldid=3D281998868</A><BR>repeats them and adds new ones]: "You then=
 joined in with straw men and<BR>personal attacks... I've been very moderat=
e about using the "N word" in<BR>the context of Piotrus' campaign to change=
 the name of a Lithuanian
 city<BR>to a Polish spelling... Piotrus, please stop with the frivolous<BR=
>forum-shopping and please let a "debate" remain a debate without trying<BR=
>to escalate it into a dispute". He also accused me of "disrupting ANI",<BR=
>&nbsp;making<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWi=
kipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&amp;diff=3D282006059&amp;oldid=3D282005792" tar=
get=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWik=
ipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&amp;diff=3D282006059&amp;oldid=3D282005792</A><B=
R>personal attacks] towards him (I dearly invite anybody to read the post<B=
R>in his diff and try to find any personal attack there) and of<BR>[<A href=
=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27=
_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D282006979" target=3D_bla=
nk rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Adm=
inistrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D282006979<=
/A><BR>nationalist
 POV]<BR>([<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia=
:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D282007=
762" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit=
le=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;=
oldid=3D282007762</A><BR>also here]). His final comment at wikiquette indic=
ated no good will<BR>towards dispute resolution:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.w=
ikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&amp;diff=3Dpre=
v&amp;oldid=3D282007379" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia=
.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;ol=
did=3D282007379</A><BR>"The phoney indignation is boring, and nothing's gon=
na happen here.<BR>Please just stop all this drama-mongering"]. --~~~~<BR><=
BR>*April 6: as he has done in the past, Deacon appears immediately in a<BR=
>thread I opened at AE, even through it doesn't concern him at all, to<BR>d=
efend an editor I complained
 about:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedi=
a%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D2822=
16930&amp;oldid=3D282211595" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikip=
edia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FAr=
bitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282216930&amp;oldid=3D282211595</A>]<BR>; =
he there accuses me of "forum-shopping", and categorizes those who<BR>disag=
ree with the editor I disagree with as "tendentious multi-blocked<BR>nation=
alists trolls". Next, he makes an unbacked personal attack at<BR>another Po=
lish user, Radeksz ("he (Dr. Dan) is not by any means half as<BR>problemati=
c a user as, for instance, User:Radeksz whom Piotrus has gone<BR>to a lot o=
f trouble to protect"). He then hijacks the AE request by<BR>posting obsole=
te (last arbcom) evidence against Radeksz:<BR>[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrato=
rs%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282236979&amp;oldid=3D=
282232264" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.p=
hp?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&=
amp;diff=3D282236979&amp;oldid=3D282232264</A>].<BR>&nbsp; Note that he use=
s evidence and claims from the rejected arbitration<BR>clarification reques=
t to smear my and Radeksz name.<BR>Third 3RR violation: Piotrus closes the =
issue himself to avoid a block"<BR>and so on. Note also that<BR>[<A href=3D=
"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282237414&amp;oldid=3D28223716=
5" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=
=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=
=3D282237414&amp;oldid=3D282237165</A><BR>he moves Radeksz post] like he di=
d with mine earlier, with
 potentially<BR>confusing results. When I attempted to structure the discus=
sion, he<BR>reverted me with an uncivil edit summary<BR>([<A href=3D"http:/=
/en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeb=
oard%2FArbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282275525&amp;oldid=3D282275111%5=
D" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=
=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&amp;=
diff=3D282275525&amp;oldid=3D282275111]</A>).<BR>Subsequently, a neutral ad=
min reviewing this case<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?=
title=3DUser_talk%3ADeacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3D282278967&amp;oldid=3D2=
82277765" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph=
p?title=3DUser_talk%3ADeacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3D282278967&amp;oldid=
=3D282277765</A><BR>supported my edit], as<BR>[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrato=
rs%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282288194&amp;oldid=3D=
282287798" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.p=
hp?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&=
amp;diff=3D282288194&amp;oldid=3D282287798</A><BR>did another].<BR><BR>*Apr=
il 7:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_=
talk:Requested_moves&amp;diff=3D282445068&amp;oldid=3D282443991" target=3D_=
blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_=
talk:Requested_moves&amp;diff=3D282445068&amp;oldid=3D282443991</A><BR>Deac=
on presents an analysis of vote], dividing users into ethnic camps,<BR>with=
 bad faith assumptions "long term ally of certain users", "(followed<BR>use=
r X and opposed him". Notably, the bad faith assumptions are limited<BR>to =
the users opposing him; and the ethnic analysis is twisted - in an<BR>attem=
pt to show how Poles outvote
 Lithuanians, Lithuanian users agreeing<BR>with Deacon and living in US are=
 shown as Americans<BR>([<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit=
le=3DWikipedia_talk%3ARequested_moves&amp;diff=3D282579954&amp;oldid=3D2825=
04996%5D" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph=
p?title=3DWikipedia_talk%3ARequested_moves&amp;diff=3D282579954&amp;oldid=
=3D282504996]</A>),<BR>but Poles living in US are, well, Poles...<BR><BR>*[=
<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdminist=
rators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282467288&amp;ol=
did=3D282463214" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/i=
ndex.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_en=
forcement&amp;diff=3D282467288&amp;oldid=3D282463214</A><BR>more bad faith =
and slander]: "the four users are all your normal<BR>tag-team partners I'd =
expect to turn up here....", "It's no secret that<BR>I am one of many many =
users who have had a problem
 with much of your<BR>behaviour Piotrus," "The long old ad hominems you've =
been in the habit<BR>of launching against me and any one else whenever they=
 try to ensure a<BR>fair hearing for one of your ideological "opponents" wo=
n't make your<BR>"evidence" against this one any stronger"<BR><BR>*stalking=
:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_talk=
%3ARequested_moves&amp;diff=3D282436896&amp;oldid=3D282435103" target=3D_bl=
ank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_ta=
lk%3ARequested_moves&amp;diff=3D282436896&amp;oldid=3D282435103</A><BR>Deac=
on appears on a Wikipedia page and answers my question, defending a<BR>disr=
uptive user]<BR><BR>*[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=
=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&amp;=
diff=3D282618987&amp;oldid=3D282609281" target=3D_blank
 rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdm=
inistrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282618987&a=
mp;oldid=3D282609281</A>]:<BR>Deacon misrepresents the arbcom case, accuses=
 me of "edit-warring in<BR>with poorly-sourced nationalistic nonsense again=
st consensus," (and also<BR>slanders other editors: "no-one's gonna care, a=
s most of the AE admins<BR>have done much worse"). He repeats claims from l=
ast ArbCom that were<BR>dismissed by arbcom (but were not clearly rejected,=
 so as I predicted,<BR>all the accusations will get repeated on an on): "us=
er who spends much<BR>of his wiki-time IMing with notorious nationalist edi=
t-warriors (like<BR>Alden Jones...)", "That the editors who've joined you h=
ere are your<BR>normal tag-teamers"<BR><BR>*[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia=
.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3ASandstein&amp;diff=3D282633373&amp;old=
id=3D282633058" target=3D_blank
 rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3ASan=
dstein&amp;diff=3D282633373&amp;oldid=3D282633058</A>]:<BR>here Deacon appe=
ars on talk page to defend an editor that offended me<BR>and slanders me ag=
ain: "it's rather saintly compared with much of the<BR>stuff... Piotrus' al=
lies say but never gets reported...<BR><BR>* April 9: Accusing other editor=
s:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Jogaila&=
amp;diff=3D282714988&amp;oldid=3D282714688" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>=
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Jogaila&amp;diff=3D2827149=
88&amp;oldid=3D282714688</A><BR>of nationalism]<BR><BR>*May 21: just few da=
ys after returning from his 1-month wikibreak,<BR>Deacon becomes involved i=
n a SPI case involving a Polish user, and<BR>becomes the only non-SPI/CU/Ar=
bCom official to see the "secret evidence"<BR>in this case:<BR>[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Sockpuppet_i=
nvestigations/Molobo&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D291375384" target=3D_blank=
 rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Sockp=
uppet_investigations/Molobo&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D291375384</A>].<BR>=
Requests from other non-SPI/CU/ArbCom editors to obtain this evidence,<BR>a=
nd to ask why Deacon obtained this evidence, are ignored or rejected.<BR><B=
R>*May 31:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikip=
edia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&amp;diff=3D293606105&amp;oldid=3D29360=
2145" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti=
tle=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&amp;diff=3D293606105&amp;ol=
did=3D293602145</A><BR>bad faith against Polish users in general and Piotru=
s in particular]<BR><BR>*June 2:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/i=
ndex.php?title=3DUser_talk%3AAvraham&amp;diff=3D294030252&amp;oldid=3D29402=
9001" target=3D_blank
 rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3AAvr=
aham&amp;diff=3D294030252&amp;oldid=3D294029001</A><BR>Bad faith, PA agains=
t me]<BR><BR>*June 3:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti=
tle=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&amp;diff=3D29416=
5024&amp;oldid=3D294163865" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipe=
dia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_wa=
rring&amp;diff=3D294165024&amp;oldid=3D294163865</A><BR>bad faith], note<BR=
>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administ=
rators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&amp;diff=3D294193718&amp;oldid=3D2941844=
61" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?titl=
e=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&amp;diff=3D2941937=
18&amp;oldid=3D294184461</A><BR>that an editor was offended]<BR>*[<A href=
=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapet=
zim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D294155101"
 target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=
=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D294155101</A>=
<BR>refusal to discuss his behavior]<BR><BR>*June 5:<BR>*[<A href=3D"http:/=
/en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;di=
ff=3D294456430&amp;oldid=3D294450386" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http:/=
/en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;di=
ff=3D294456430&amp;oldid=3D294450386</A><BR>refuses mediation, assumes bad =
faith]<BR><BR>*June 8:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t=
itle=3DUser_talk:Jacurek&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295013000" target=3D_b=
lank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:J=
acurek&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295013000</A><BR>abuse of admin powers]<=
BR>*June 8:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser=
_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295082429" target=3D=
_blank
 rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deaco=
n_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295082429</A><BR>refusal to dis=
cuss the issues, removing any criticism as "slanderous<BR>personal attacks"=
] and<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:=
Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3D295112666&amp;oldid=3D295112174" target=3D_=
blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:=
Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3D295112666&amp;oldid=3D295112174</A><BR>clos=
ing the discussion]<BR>*June 8:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/in=
dex.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D=
295086772" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.p=
hp?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D29508=
6772</A><BR>bad faith towards administrative actions of others]<BR>*June 8:=
<BR>*[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministra=
tors%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&amp;diff=3D295085030&amp;oldid=3D295084717"=
 target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=
=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&amp;diff=3D2950850=
30&amp;oldid=3D295084717</A><BR>
<DIV class=3Dim>accusing an editor of being "a hard-core edit warrior"]<BR>=
</DIV>*June 8: more bad faith and PAs:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.o=
rg/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&amp;diff=
=3D295190903&amp;oldid=3D295190539" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://e=
n.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcem=
ent&amp;diff=3D295190903&amp;oldid=3D295190539</A><BR>I would ask however t=
hat Radeksz is added to the Diguren case. He<BR>appears to be a one-purpose=
 nationalist account who does nothing on<BR>wikipedia but edit-war against =
German and Lithuanian users (mainly<BR>German users), and then go shopping =
against them.]<BR>*June 8:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.p=
hp?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;o=
ldid=3D295205955" target=3D_blank
 rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbit=
ration/Requests/Enforcement&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295205955</A><BR>ba=
d faith: "Poland-Lithuania-Russia axis"... clear dislike users in this<BR>a=
rea have towards me]<BR>*June 8:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/i=
ndex.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&amp;diff=3Dprev=
&amp;oldid=3D295218878" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.=
org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&amp;diff=
=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295218878</A><BR>bad faith towards others, characterizi=
ng his opponents as "battlers"]<BR>*June 8:<BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipe=
dia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&amp;=
diff=3D295226926&amp;oldid=3D295226895" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http=
://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enfo=
rcement&amp;diff=3D295226926&amp;oldid=3D295226895</A><BR>more ofthe above:=
 "satisfaction of the fictional
 anti-Polishness<BR>conveniently manufactured by the tendentious swarm abov=
e"]<BR>
<DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=3Dh5><BR>--<BR>Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny &nbsp; &nbs=
p; &nbsp; |||____ &nbsp;__ __<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; =
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp=
; &nbsp; &nbsp; I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D&gt;<BR>"Lennier, get us the h=
ell out of here." &nbsp; &nbsp; |||<BR>"Initiating 'getting the hell out of=
 here' maneuver."<BR>&nbsp;-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of=
 the Wolf"<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Wikipe=
dia statistics discussion list<BR><A href=3D"http://us.mc328.mail.yahoo.com=
/mc/compose?to=3Dfolks@wikipedometer.net" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow ym=
ailto=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</A><BR><A =
href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=3D_=
blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folk=
s</A><BR></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV><BR>-----Inline Attachmen=
t Follows-----<BR><BR>
<DIV class=3DplainMail>_______________________________________________<BR>W=
ikipedia statistics discussion list<BR><A href=3D"http://us.mc328.mail.yaho=
o.com/mc/compose?to=3Dfolks@wikipedometer.net" ymailto=3D"mailto:folks@wiki=
pedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</A><BR><A href=3D"http://wikipedomet=
er.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=3D_blank>http://wikipedometer=
.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></t=
able><br>=0A=0A=0A=0A      
--0-2105495144-1244519850=:934--


--===============4865124135481495427==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4865124135481495427==--


