X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Feb  7 13:55:47 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0902070428o347b1120xf1010e23b61cf91f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4f045a880902070217i23fce0e1i1b5b7caa3faf667f@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0902070420g7b8a1277rea94fccde1e59f93@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0902070428o347b1120xf1010e23b61cf91f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:55:36 +0200
Message-ID: <f826636f0902070455j7ea50a4cx5ea94f20bd173e4b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.7
X-Spam_score_int: 7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Seems too complicated :). Actually, I didn't want to
	spend too much time with it. Since you know what's going on, tell me
	your best guess, please, what is more useful, if I try to close the
	votes and ask a speedy deletion, or if I add another "delete/merge"?
	Dorin 2009/2/7 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Merge discussion closure
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4211475730184990163=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.0
X-Spam_score_int: 20
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Seems too complicated :). Actually, I didn't want to
	spend too much time with it. Since you know what's going on, tell me
	your best guess, please, what is more useful, if I try to close the
	votes and ask a speedy deletion, or if I add another "delete/merge"?
	Dorin 2009/2/7 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.5000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4211475730184990163==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b3875fe23f046253a79b

--001636c5b3875fe23f046253a79b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Seems too complicated :). Actually, I didn't want to spend too much time
with it. Since you know what's going on, tell me your best guess, please,
what is more useful, if I try to close the votes and ask a speedy deletion,
or if I add another "delete/merge"?
Dorin
2009/2/7 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>

>  On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 14:20, Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> 1) Can a non-admin close the merge? If not, I'll just add another delete
>> vote.
>>
>
> I believe merge votes can be closed by non-administrators.  However, a
> non-administrator can't delete the article being merged, so when you
> complete the merge, the procedure seems to require you blank the source
> page, and then request speedy deletion under category A3 via
> {{db-nocontent}}.  However, just in case, read the relevant pages yourself
> -- the ongoing AFD might complicate things.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--001636c5b3875fe23f046253a79b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>Seems too complicated :). Actually, I didn&#39;t want to spend too muc=
h time with it. Since you know what&#39;s going on, tell me your best guess=
, please, what is more useful, if I try to close the votes and ask a speedy=
 deletion, or if I add another &quot;delete/merge&quot;?<br>
</div>
<div>Dorin<br></div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/2/7 Digwuren <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">
<div class=3D"Ih2E3d">On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 14:20, Dorin Cheptea <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:dorin.cheptea@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">d=
orin.cheptea@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>1) Can a non-admin close the merge? If not, I&#39;ll just add another =
delete vote.</div></blockquote>
<div><br></div></div>
<div>I believe merge votes can be closed by non-administrators. &nbsp;Howev=
er, a non-administrator can&#39;t delete the article being merged, so when =
you complete the merge, the procedure seems to require you blank the source=
 page, and then request speedy deletion under category A3 via {{db-noconten=
t}}. &nbsp;However, just in case, read the relevant pages yourself -- the o=
ngoing AFD might complicate things.</div>

<div><br></div></div><font color=3D"#888888">-- <br>Andres Soolo<br></font>=
<br>_______________________________________________<br>Wikipedia statistics=
 discussion list<br><a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipe=
dometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>=
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--001636c5b3875fe23f046253a79b--


--===============4211475730184990163==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4211475730184990163==--


