X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Sep 11 03:36:49 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0909101806k1dd62301ocbaa4a72707cb65f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4f045a880909101641w539aa747y2a9fb4724a9585a8@mail.gmail.com>
	<753598.6181.qm@web45110.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<6c9a05ec0909101806k1dd62301ocbaa4a72707cb65f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:36:38 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880909101836h76d8badn88efff1771de0d9c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Given that he has indicated on his User page that he
	holds a PhD and has published scientific papers, one may be misled into
	believing that he is this person:
	http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=Paul%20Siebert [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Paul Siebert
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Given that he has indicated on his User page that he
	holds a PhD and has published scientific papers, one may be misled into
	believing that he is this person:
	http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=Paul%20Siebert [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Given that he has indicated on his User page that he holds a PhD and
has published scientific papers, one may be misled into believing that
he is this person:
http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=Paul%20Siebert

This seems somewhat deceptive if his real name is not "Paul Siebert".

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wikipedia double speak mode on:Obviously naming oneself after a Soviet agent
> would indicate a heavy POV of the user, and as such he can't be judged to
> objectively view the article(s) in question.
>
> So there is an argument one can hammer into infinity when dealing with him
> in discussions.
>
> 2009/9/11 Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>
>>
>> This explains everything!!
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
>> To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:41:22 PM
>> Subject: [WPM] Paul Siebert
>>
>> Biophy asks the question:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paul_Siebert&diff=313054250&oldid=311971241
>>
>> And Paul responds "Yes"
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Biophys&diff=313057818&oldid=313054383
>>
>> Andrei, what did Paul say on your talk page?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

