X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 19 02:36:36 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A3ADE1A.5070204@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:38:50 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <c3b2b3db0906180741j7c9eea7fnf048b0cd89626ca1@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906181041w4fd601d7t526bd6ad4cd30db4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906181041w4fd601d7t526bd6ad4cd30db4@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41,
	Andrei
	Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com > <mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com>> wrote:
	>
	> I reported him to AE. Everyone is welcome to add more diffs. > > >
	Offliner has already responded with a countersuit. If it was AN/I, >
	counterdrama was the way to go, but I suspect it doesn't work very well
	> on AE. What actions should we undertake to counter this? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei
	Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com > <mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com>> wrote: >
	> I reported him to AE. Everyone is welcome to add more diffs. > > >
	Offliner has already responded with a countersuit. If it was AN/I, >
	counterdrama was the way to go, but I suspect it doesn't work very well
	> on AE. What actions should we undertake to counter this? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Digwuren wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com 
> <mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I reported him to AE. Everyone is welcome to add more diffs.
> 
> 
> Offliner has already responded with a countersuit.  If it was AN/I, 
> counterdrama was the way to go, but I suspect it doesn't work very well 
> on AE.  What actions should we undertake to counter this?

Avoid spamming the anti-Offliner thread, unless you can add evidence 
(I'd suggest doing so in a separate subsection entitled "evidence 
presented by ..."). Remember: lenght is counterproductive. Which means, 
of course - spam the hell out of whatever thread he started :>

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

