X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul 11 22:23:46 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0907111245q43767204g85449e057c8ba577@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0905171211x4f4b3f44m6f833bc0823242e8@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0907111245q43767204g85449e057c8ba577@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:23:35 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907111323p3a258ac2i8fa60bbb959e0750@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I think we should wait on the RfC until we have a
	pretty
	strong case - otherwise it might be seen the same way that Skapperod's
	latest is being interpreted, as just more Eastern European bickering and
	spurious reports. We should save Sandstein's comments [
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=next&oldid=301570502]
	and Adjust Shift's pleading [
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&diff=301581443&oldid=301571717
	] to use as part of the RfC in the future. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] RfC regarding Skapperod
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3663470346444910290=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I think we should wait on the RfC until we have a pretty
	strong case - otherwise it might be seen the same way that Skapperod's
	latest is being interpreted, as just more Eastern European bickering and
	spurious reports. We should save Sandstein's comments [
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=next&oldid=301570502]
	and Adjust Shift's pleading [
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&diff=301581443&oldid=301571717
	] to use as part of the RfC in the future. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3663470346444910290==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636a7d9c810c1fb046e73dd35

--001636a7d9c810c1fb046e73dd35
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I think we should wait on the RfC until we have a pretty strong case -
otherwise it might be seen the same way that Skapperod's latest is being
interpreted, as just more Eastern European bickering and spurious reports.
We should save Sandstein's comments [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=next&oldid=301570502]
and Adjust Shift's pleading [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&diff=301581443&oldid=301571717
]
to use as part of the RfC in the future.

Radek


2009/7/11 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>

> To all email users-this message comes with text file where I wrote
> down my earlier draft of my RFC against Skapperod.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--001636a7d9c810c1fb046e73dd35
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think we should wait on the RfC until we have a pretty strong case - othe=
rwise it might be seen the same way that Skapperod&#39;s latest is being in=
terpreted, as just more Eastern European bickering and spurious reports. <b=
r>
We should save Sandstein&#39;s comments [<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org=
/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&amp;diff=3D=
next&amp;oldid=3D301570502">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWik=
ipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&amp;diff=3Dnext&amp;oldid=3D3015705=
02</a>] and Adjust Shift&#39;s pleading [<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org=
/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Sandstein&amp;diff=3D301581443&amp;oldid=3D3=
01571717">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Sandstein&a=
mp;diff=3D301581443&amp;oldid=3D301571717</a>]<br>
to use as part of the RfC in the future.<br><br>Radek<br><br><br><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/11 Molobo Molobo <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"m=
ailto:molobus@gmail.com">molobus@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); mar=
gin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
To all email users-this message comes with text file where I wrote<br>
down my earlier draft of my RFC against Skapperod.<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--001636a7d9c810c1fb046e73dd35--


--===============3663470346444910290==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3663470346444910290==--


