X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 19 09:39:13 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A3ADE1A.5070204@post.pl>
References: <c3b2b3db0906180741j7c9eea7fnf048b0cd89626ca1@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906181041w4fd601d7t526bd6ad4cd30db4@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3ADE1A.5070204@post.pl>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:38:54 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906190038u3e43e86dr161e452ff5fb9ac8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:38, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > > Offliner has already responded with a
	countersuit. If it was AN/I, > > counterdrama was the way to go, but I
	suspect it doesn't work very well > > on AE. What actions should we
	undertake to counter this? > > Avoid spamming the anti-Offliner thread, 
	unless you can add evidence > (I'd suggest doing so in a separate
	subsection entitled "evidence > presented by ..."). Remember: lenght is
	counterproductive. Which means, > of course - spam the hell out of
	whatever thread he started :> [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0747647919878504577=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:38, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > > Offliner has already responded with a
	countersuit. If it was AN/I, > > counterdrama was the way to go, but I
	suspect it doesn't work very well > > on AE. What actions should we
	undertake to counter this? > > Avoid spamming the anti-Offliner thread,
	unless you can add evidence > (I'd suggest doing so in a separate
	subsection entitled "evidence > presented by ..."). Remember: lenght is
	counterproductive. Which means, > of course - spam the hell out of
	whatever thread he started :> [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0747647919878504577==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7786cd55f2e046cae9d12

--001485f7786cd55f2e046cae9d12
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:38, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> > Offliner has already responded with a countersuit.  If it was AN/I,
> > counterdrama was the way to go, but I suspect it doesn't work very well
> > on AE.  What actions should we undertake to counter this?
>
> Avoid spamming the anti-Offliner thread, unless you can add evidence
> (I'd suggest doing so in a separate subsection entitled "evidence
> presented by ..."). Remember: lenght is counterproductive. Which means,
> of course - spam the hell out of whatever thread he started :>


That's how it works in AN/I.  I've gotten the impression that on AE, length
is frowned upon.  Are you *positive* it'll work?

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001485f7786cd55f2e046cae9d12
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:38, Piotr Konieczny <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin=
: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">&gt; Offliner has already responded with a countersuit. =
=C2=A0If it was AN/I,<br>
&gt; counterdrama was the way to go, but I suspect it doesn&#39;t work very=
 well<br>
&gt; on AE. =C2=A0What actions should we undertake to counter this?<br>
<br>
</div>Avoid spamming the anti-Offliner thread, unless you can add evidence<=
br>
(I&#39;d suggest doing so in a separate subsection entitled &quot;evidence<=
br>
presented by ...&quot;). Remember: lenght is counterproductive. Which means=
,<br>
of course - spam the hell out of whatever thread he started :&gt;</blockquo=
te><div><br>That&#39;s how it works in AN/I.=C2=A0 I&#39;ve gotten the impr=
ession that on AE, length is frowned upon.=C2=A0 Are you *positive* it&#39;=
ll work?<br>
</div></div><br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001485f7786cd55f2e046cae9d12--


--===============0747647919878504577==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0747647919878504577==--


