X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Sep 10 00:50:15 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0909091408r243d463coc9ac33e49e4bc19a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0909080653o7591b5c2j44606a827a5a8533@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0909080702q41b4b80aw6d0ede1c7c62f958@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0909082341g16f2ec66mbbcdc525c863c058@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0909090542j7ded5c09gb9b17786032390d9@mail.gmail.com>
	<4AA7E444.6050602@post.pl>
	<4fbe29dd0909091203s1ac491a9h2208b98dfba553dc@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0909091216l6c6ff7a7tbd383515f86f6e5a@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0909091221o2d914929n27f916da3e3633ee@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0909091408r243d463coc9ac33e49e4bc19a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:50:02 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0909091550x14a9d473x697817edeb8d2078@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 00:08, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 22:21, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Man, Russavia is REALLY loosing it. I
	think the strategy now for the >> cartel is going to be to try and get
	one of us restricted in the similar way >> - since there's no way that
	after everything he said Russavia can have his >> ban revoked. > > >
	Never say never. If Irpen were around, there would now quite a bit of >
	behind-the-scenes work done to convince Sandstein of his "error". It
	may > still happen. > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Russavia got Bannned !
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1068436427653471026=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 00:08, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 22:21, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Man, Russavia is REALLY loosing it. I
	think the strategy now for the >> cartel is going to be to try and get
	one of us restricted in the similar way >> - since there's no way that
	after everything he said Russavia can have his >> ban revoked. > > >
	Never say never. If Irpen were around, there would now quite a bit of >
	behind-the-scenes work done to convince Sandstein of his "error". It may
	> still happen. > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1068436427653471026==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7c2644a7df404732ce773

--001485f7c2644a7df404732ce773
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 00:08, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 22:21, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Man, Russavia is REALLY loosing it. I think the strategy now for the
>> cartel is going to be to try and get one of us restricted in the similar way
>> - since there's no way that after everything he said Russavia can have his
>> ban revoked.
>
>
> Never say never.  If Irpen were around, there would now quite a bit of
> behind-the-scenes work done to convince Sandstein of his "error".  It may
> still happen.
>

And here it comes: <
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Russavia&diff=prev&oldid=312849310>.
 I didn't expect KNewman.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001485f7c2644a7df404732ce773
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 00:08, Digwuren <span di=
r=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&=
gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 =
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 22:21, =
radek szulga <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">rsszulga@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pa=
dding-left:1ex">

Man, Russavia is REALLY loosing it. I think the strategy now for the cartel=
 is going to be to try and get one of us restricted in the similar way - si=
nce there&#39;s no way that after everything he said Russavia can have his =
ban revoked.</blockquote>

<div><br></div></div><div>Never say never. =C2=A0If Irpen were around, ther=
e would now quite a bit of behind-the-scenes work done to convince Sandstei=
n of his &quot;error&quot;. =C2=A0It may still happen.</div></div></blockqu=
ote><div>
<br></div><div>And=C2=A0here=C2=A0it=C2=A0comes:=C2=A0&lt;<a href=3D"http:/=
/en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Russavia&amp;diff=3Dprev&am=
p;oldid=3D312849310">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:=
Russavia&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D312849310</a>&gt;. =C2=A0I didn&#39;t =
expect KNewman.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001485f7c2644a7df404732ce773--


--===============1068436427653471026==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1068436427653471026==--


