X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jul 15 09:43:44 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880907141805v60116b6agabbc1f2b237248ef@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4f045a880907141805v60116b6agabbc1f2b237248ef@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:43:27 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0907150043v62dd85dcs9482d82e82039cc0@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:05, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > Some of us have probably heard of the
	antics of Giano (seems to be an > ally of Bishonen) and his huge block
	log. Now it seems that he has > openly returned as GiacomoReturned with
	a clean block without any > trouble, see: > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Giano_II >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GiacomoReturned > > Seems to me it is
	quite permissible to return with a new username, so > long as there is
	no active sanction in place and the user clearly > links the new and
	old accounts. Thoughts? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Giano_II
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6978690928290107298=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:05, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > Some of us have probably heard of the
	antics of Giano (seems to be an > ally of Bishonen) and his huge block
	log. Now it seems that he has > openly returned as GiacomoReturned with
	a clean block without any > trouble, see: > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Giano_II >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GiacomoReturned > > Seems to me it is
	quite permissible to return with a new username, so > long as there is
	no active sanction in place and the user clearly > links the new and old
	accounts. Thoughts? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6978690928290107298==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd8e74f20fb7046eb9b5a3

--0016e6dd8e74f20fb7046eb9b5a3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:05, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:

> Some of us have probably heard of the antics of Giano (seems to be an
> ally of Bishonen) and his huge block log. Now it seems that he has
> openly returned as GiacomoReturned with a clean block without any
> trouble, see:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Giano_II
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GiacomoReturned
>
> Seems to me it is quite permissible to return with a new username, so
> long as there is no active sanction in place and the user clearly
> links the new and old accounts. Thoughts?


Giano is a special case: he's got a long history of being a Blessed
Troublemaker.  It's a common r=C3=B4le in dysfunctional families, so it's o=
nly to
be expected that Wikipedia would have those.

--=20
Andres Soolo

--0016e6dd8e74f20fb7046eb9b5a3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:05, Martin <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:martint20@gmail.com">martint20@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Some of us have probably heard of the antics of Giano (seems to be an<br>
ally of Bishonen) and his huge block log. Now it seems that he has<br>
openly returned as GiacomoReturned with a clean block without any<br>
trouble, see:<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Giano_II" target=3D"_blank">ht=
tp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Giano_II</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GiacomoReturned" target=3D"_bl=
ank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GiacomoReturned</a><br>
<br>
Seems to me it is quite permissible to return with a new username, so<br>
long as there is no active sanction in place and the user clearly<br>
links the new and old accounts. Thoughts?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>G=
iano is a special case: he&#39;s got a long history of being a Blessed Trou=
blemaker. =C2=A0It&#39;s a common r=C3=B4le in dysfunctional families, so i=
t&#39;s only to be expected that Wikipedia would have those.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e6dd8e74f20fb7046eb9b5a3--


--===============6978690928290107298==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6978690928290107298==--


