X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  8 23:42:25 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A2D85AA.1070105@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:42:02 +0200
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <73789.71843.qm@web32802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <73789.71843.qm@web32802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  piotr micula wrote: > Piotrus,
	do you have any diffs to
	prove our point against Deacon? If you > do, please share them here.
	This is my up-to-date evidence list against Deacon: * stalking by D
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking on Deacon)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  piotr micula wrote: > Piotrus, do you have any diffs to
	prove our point against Deacon? If you > do, please share them here.
	This is my up-to-date evidence list against Deacon: * stalking by D
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

piotr micula wrote:
> Piotrus, do you have any diffs to prove our point against Deacon? If you 
> do, please share them here.

This is my up-to-date evidence list against Deacon:

* stalking by D

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Eastern_European_disputes/Evidence#Tag_team_1:_Russian

* February 4 and 5, 2009 at AE: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=268589325], 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=268735675] 

*February 25, 2009 at article discussion: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AHolocaust_in_Lithuania&diff=273253643&oldid=273250888]

*February: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&oldid=270472942#Request_for_clarification:_Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration.2FEastern_European_disputes]
an ArbCom clarification request, in which Deacon tries to portray may 
normal administrative actions as some sort of wrongdoing, again. To 
quote from Coren: "what I see is a 3RR report that was closed 
uncontroversially and properly (and which nobody contests on its face, 
for that matter), and a thread on AE that attempts to rely on a tenuous 
possible conflict of interest to invoke sanctions according to a 
particularily imaginative reading of a remedy which was swiftly (and 
correctly) closed as unactionable. It is impossible, in this context, to 
see this request as little more than forum shopping; and an attempt to 
misuse the committee into a bludgeon in a vendetta." But Deacon didn't 
even get a warning.

*April 3 and 4, 2009 at article and policy space: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Vilnius_%281655%29&diff=281534126&oldid=281530841 
move], and when at talk 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Vilnius_(1655)&diff=281724660&oldid=281724299 
I cite a naming policy in support of a version], 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ANaming_conventions_%28geographic_names%29&diff=281729338&oldid=281533853 
he changes the estabilished policy]! (he does so again on 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)&diff=282447250&oldid=282446029 
April 7] and 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ANaming_conventions_%28geographic_names%29&diff=282811646&oldid=282716398 
on April 9], then responds with 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Vilnius_(1655)&diff=281729768&oldid=281729093 
personal remarks on talk] (also 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Vilnius_(1655)&diff=prev&oldid=281848806 
here]) and misrepresents the case at 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=281718073 
WP:ANI] criticizing Polish editors, then launches a clear personal 
attack: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=281909360 
"Piotrus, partizan campaigning with personal attacks and straw men on 
AN/I is not likely to produce any results for you"], and another one: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=281996850 
"I honestly can't see any useful purpose to your participation in this 
thread except as partizan campaigning; unless that is stacking up Polish 
votes to to Polonise the name of the Lithuanian capital has nothing to 
do with nationalism."]

Please note that Deacon refuses to answer how he became aware of my edit 
to this orphaned article 
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&diff=prev&oldid=282009689]).

*previous attempts at dispute resolution: 
[[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Bad_faith_towards_me\Wikiquette alerts]] 
(April 5): I've asked Deacon to apologize for his uncivil remarks 
towards me; he instead 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&diff=282002372&oldid=281998868 
repeats them and adds new ones]: "You then joined in with straw men and 
personal attacks... I've been very moderate about using the "N word" in 
the context of Piotrus' campaign to change the name of a Lithuanian city 
to a Polish spelling... Piotrus, please stop with the frivolous 
forum-shopping and please let a "debate" remain a debate without trying 
to escalate it into a dispute". He also accused me of "disrupting ANI", 
  making 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&diff=282006059&oldid=282005792 
personal attacks] towards him (I dearly invite anybody to read the post 
in his diff and try to find any personal attack there) and of 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=282006979 
nationalist POV] 
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=282007762 
also here]). His final comment at wikiquette indicated no good will 
towards dispute resolution: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&diff=prev&oldid=282007379 
"The phoney indignation is boring, and nothing's gonna happen here. 
Please just stop all this drama-mongering"]. --~~~~

*April 6: as he has done in the past, Deacon appears immediately in a 
thread I opened at AE, even through it doesn't concern him at all, to 
defend an editor I complained about: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=282216930&oldid=282211595] 
; he there accuses me of "forum-shopping", and categorizes those who 
disagree with the editor I disagree with as "tendentious multi-blocked 
nationalists trolls". Next, he makes an unbacked personal attack at 
another Polish user, Radeksz ("he (Dr. Dan) is not by any means half as 
problematic a user as, for instance, User:Radeksz whom Piotrus has gone 
to a lot of trouble to protect"). He then hijacks the AE request by 
posting obsolete (last arbcom) evidence against Radeksz: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=282236979&oldid=282232264]. 
   Note that he uses evidence and claims from the rejected arbitration 
clarification request to smear my and Radeksz name.
Third 3RR violation: Piotrus closes the issue himself to avoid a block" 
and so on. Note also that 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=282237414&oldid=282237165 
he moves Radeksz post] like he did with mine earlier, with potentially 
confusing results. When I attempted to structure the discussion, he 
reverted me with an uncivil edit summary 
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=282275525&oldid=282275111]). 
Subsequently, a neutral admin reviewing this case 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADeacon_of_Pndapetzim&diff=282278967&oldid=282277765 
supported my edit], as 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=282288194&oldid=282287798 
did another].

*April 7: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requested_moves&diff=282445068&oldid=282443991 
Deacon presents an analysis of vote], dividing users into ethnic camps, 
with bad faith assumptions "long term ally of certain users", "(followed 
user X and opposed him". Notably, the bad faith assumptions are limited 
to the users opposing him; and the ethnic analysis is twisted - in an 
attempt to show how Poles outvote Lithuanians, Lithuanian users agreeing 
with Deacon and living in US are shown as Americans 
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequested_moves&diff=282579954&oldid=282504996]), 
but Poles living in US are, well, Poles...

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=282467288&oldid=282463214 
more bad faith and slander]: "the four users are all your normal 
tag-team partners I'd expect to turn up here....", "It's no secret that 
I am one of many many users who have had a problem with much of your 
behaviour Piotrus," "The long old ad hominems you've been in the habit 
of launching against me and any one else whenever they try to ensure a 
fair hearing for one of your ideological "opponents" won't make your 
"evidence" against this one any stronger"

*stalking: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequested_moves&diff=282436896&oldid=282435103 
Deacon appears on a Wikipedia page and answers my question, defending a 
disruptive user]

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=282618987&oldid=282609281]: 
Deacon misrepresents the arbcom case, accuses me of "edit-warring in 
with poorly-sourced nationalistic nonsense against consensus," (and also 
slanders other editors: "no-one's gonna care, as most of the AE admins 
have done much worse"). He repeats claims from last ArbCom that were 
dismissed by arbcom (but were not clearly rejected, so as I predicted, 
all the accusations will get repeated on an on): "user who spends much 
of his wiki-time IMing with notorious nationalist edit-warriors (like 
Alden Jones...)", "That the editors who've joined you here are your 
normal tag-teamers"

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASandstein&diff=282633373&oldid=282633058]: 
here Deacon appears on talk page to defend an editor that offended me 
and slanders me again: "it's rather saintly compared with much of the 
stuff... Piotrus' allies say but never gets reported...

* April 9: Accusing other editors: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jogaila&diff=282714988&oldid=282714688 
of nationalism]

*May 21: just few days after returning from his 1-month wikibreak, 
Deacon becomes involved in a SPI case involving a Polish user, and 
becomes the only non-SPI/CU/ArbCom official to see the "secret evidence" 
in this case: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Molobo&diff=prev&oldid=291375384]. 
Requests from other non-SPI/CU/ArbCom editors to obtain this evidence, 
and to ask why Deacon obtained this evidence, are ignored or rejected.

*May 31: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&diff=293606105&oldid=293602145 
bad faith against Polish users in general and Piotrus in particular]

*June 2: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAvraham&diff=294030252&oldid=294029001 
Bad faith, PA against me]

*June 3: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=294165024&oldid=294163865 
bad faith], note 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=294193718&oldid=294184461 
that an editor was offended]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&diff=prev&oldid=294155101 
refusal to discuss his behavior]

*June 5:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&diff=294456430&oldid=294450386 
refuses mediation, assumes bad faith]

*June 8: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jacurek&diff=prev&oldid=295013000 
abuse of admin powers]
*June 8: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&diff=prev&oldid=295082429 
refusal to discuss the issues, removing any criticism as "slanderous 
personal attacks"] and 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&diff=295112666&oldid=295112174 
closing the discussion]
*June 8: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&diff=prev&oldid=295086772 
bad faith towards administrative actions of others]
*June 8:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=295085030&oldid=295084717 
accusing an editor of being "a hard-core edit warrior"]
*June 8: more bad faith and PAs: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=295190903&oldid=295190539 
I would ask however that Radeksz is added to the Diguren case. He 
appears to be a one-purpose nationalist account who does nothing on 
wikipedia but edit-war against German and Lithuanian users (mainly 
German users), and then go shopping against them.]
*June 8: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=295205955 
bad faith: "Poland-Lithuania-Russia axis"... clear dislike users in this 
area have towards me]
*June 8: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=295218878 
bad faith towards others, characterizing his opponents as "battlers"]
*June 8: 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=295226926&oldid=295226895 
more ofthe above: "satisfaction of the fictional anti-Polishness 
conveniently manufactured by the tendentious swarm above"]

-- 
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

