X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 24 07:53:51 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A41BFE1.1040300@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:55:45 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <be0.5d360a6b.3772dc2e@aol.com>
	<4f045a880906232114w3ff23eecq4003babb5cfb380e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880906232114w3ff23eecq4003babb5cfb380e@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Martin wrote: > I should have heeded your advice. I
	tried to get Thatcher to place > Russavia on a 1RR parole, she does and
	slaps one on Colchicum and > Radeksz too..... Radek should question
	this
	restriction on him, it is quite unfair. He is not mentioned at all in
	Shelly's report (it may be a good idea to write to her and ask for help
	against Tatcher going too far). Tatcher cites "Nashi (youth movement)"
	where Radek has reverted 3 times over the period of 2 weeks, once with
	an edit summary, twice without. Hardly a case of edit warring justifying
	half a year of 1RR restriction. I am in email communication with
	Tatcher
	and can ask him to revise that, but it would be even better if this
	comes from Shelly. There is no hurry - I suggest Radek tries first
	himself (start with Shelly, ask her to intervene, if she doesn't, try
	Tatcher and I'll try myself if Radek fails). Do admit that yes, you
	should have added an edit summary, and started a discussion on talk, but
	3 reverts in 2 weeks are hardly edit warring. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Hello, Martin
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Martin wrote: > I should have heeded your advice. I
	tried to get Thatcher to place > Russavia on a 1RR parole, she does and
	slaps one on Colchicum and > Radeksz too..... Radek should question this
	restriction on him, it is quite unfair. He is not mentioned at all in
	Shelly's report (it may be a good idea to write to her and ask for help
	against Tatcher going too far). Tatcher cites "Nashi (youth movement)"
	where Radek has reverted 3 times over the period of 2 weeks, once with
	an edit summary, twice without. Hardly a case of edit warring justifying
	half a year of 1RR restriction. I am in email communication with Tatcher
	and can ask him to revise that, but it would be even better if this
	comes from Shelly. There is no hurry - I suggest Radek tries first
	himself (start with Shelly, ask her to intervene, if she doesn't, try
	Tatcher and I'll try myself if Radek fails). Do admit that yes, you
	should have added an edit summary, and started a discussion on talk, but
	3 reverts in 2 weeks are hardly edit warring. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Martin wrote:
> I should have heeded your advice. I tried to get Thatcher to place
> Russavia on a 1RR parole, she does and slaps one on Colchicum and
> Radeksz too.....

Radek should question this restriction on him, it is quite unfair. He is 
not mentioned at all in Shelly's report (it may be a good idea to write 
to her and ask for help against Tatcher going too far). Tatcher cites 
"Nashi (youth movement)" where Radek has reverted 3 times over the 
period of 2 weeks, once with an edit summary, twice without. Hardly a 
case of edit warring justifying half a year of 1RR restriction. I am in 
email communication with Tatcher and can ask him to revise that, but it 
would be even better if this comes from Shelly. There is no hurry - I 
suggest Radek tries first himself (start with Shelly, ask her to 
intervene, if she doesn't, try Tatcher and I'll try myself if Radek 
fails). Do admit that yes, you should have added an edit summary, and 
started a discussion on talk, but 3 reverts in 2 weeks are hardly edit 
warring.

Btw, my previous mail to Tatcher had the effect that he changed his 1RR 
restriction to half a year.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

