X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 22 06:31:00 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A3F0974.10908@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:32:52 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <4f045a880906212005o116c23f0l5d42e3cc5d0808cc@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880906212005o116c23f0l5d42e3cc5d0808cc@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Martin wrote: > Seems Shell Kinney is investigating
	the AE issues. I found this: >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shell_Kinney/EEreportsreview > > What
	is know about her? > > It may pay to send a friendly private email to
	clarify any issues > related to areas she is investigating. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Shell Kinney investigating AE issues
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Martin wrote: > Seems Shell Kinney is investigating the
	AE issues. I found this: >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shell_Kinney/EEreportsreview > > What
	is know about her? > > It may pay to send a friendly private email to
	clarify any issues > related to areas she is investigating. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Martin wrote:
> Seems Shell Kinney is investigating the AE issues. I found this:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shell_Kinney/EEreportsreview
> 
> What is know about her?
> 
> It may pay to send a friendly private email to clarify any issues
> related to areas she is investigating.

I believe she is neutral; I also believe you have a very good idea 
above. Emailing her with explanations / evidence / apologies & promises 
of better behavior at this point is a very good idea. Particularly 
Digwuren and Biophys should so so IMMEDIATELY. Digwuren should also try 
to point out his positive content contributions anywhere, and Biophys, 
his positive content contribs in EE area (to avoid topic ban 
recommendation).


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

