X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Sep  2 03:11:11 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c9b.354f1120.37cf1136@aol.com>
References: <c9b.354f1120.37cf1136@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:10:56 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880909011810j4296b85fk1dec7f63c4cf4209@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On the other hand,
	20 years ago probably 95% would have
	believed Moscow doesn't share any responsibility, so there is progress
	here. The publicity surrounding this does appear to be higher this year,
	so no doubt many are looking at this for the first time, most likely via
	Wikipedia. So perhaps next year less people will think Moscow doesn't
	share any responsibility. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] URGENT - needs only 1 click from you
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On the other hand, 20 years ago probably 95% would have
	believed Moscow doesn't share any responsibility, so there is progress
	here. The publicity surrounding this does appear to be higher this year,
	so no doubt many are looking at this for the first time, most likely via
	Wikipedia. So perhaps next year less people will think Moscow doesn't
	share any responsibility. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

On the other hand, 20 years ago probably 95% would have believed
Moscow doesn't share any responsibility, so there is progress here.
The publicity surrounding this does appear to be higher this year, so
no doubt many are looking at this for the first time, most likely via
Wikipedia. So perhaps next year less people will think Moscow doesn't
share any responsibility.

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:07 AM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
> In a message dated 9/1/2009 5:45:48 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> dorin.cheptea@gmail.com writes:
>
> Does Moscow share responsibility with Berlin for starting WWII?
>
> That so many say no (2/3rds) either there are more of them than us or people
> are genuinely totally clueless. /Peters
> ________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

