X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 18:25:03 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A3E5F53.7000103@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:26:59 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <d56.2c7c73fd.376f07cf@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906210818v29956074o54182bdc5eeb6a8a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906210818v29956074o54182bdc5eeb6a8a@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Andrei Dombay wrote: > Perhaps we both make the same
	mistakes. First, we spend time in WP > instead of doing our real work
	(but such is addiction). Second, we both > talk too much in WP instead
	of creating content. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] TO biophys
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Andrei Dombay wrote: > Perhaps we both make the same
	mistakes. First, we spend time in WP > instead of doing our real work
	(but such is addiction). Second, we both > talk too much in WP instead
	of creating content. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Andrei Dombay wrote:
> Perhaps we both make the same mistakes. First, we spend time in WP 
> instead of doing our real work (but such is addiction). Second, we both 
> talk too much in WP instead of creating content.

Here, here :) Creating content is important. What I'd suggest is that 
you both vanish (WP:RTV) - or slowly phase out old account - and repaper 
under a new one that will have different editing patterns - in terms of 
creating more content. This will be to the benefit of all...

Let's face this: your current account names are pretty muddy, and it is 
more and more likely some future restriction will be pretty bad for you 
(it is likely to be bad for both sides, but that's a different issue). 
But if your accounts were to drastically limit their activity or become 
inactive, and new ones were, well, new and better behaved, ArbCom could 
be convinced to ignore you due to you being inactive.

Sadly (or not), this is all wiki-legal (I don't think you are under any 
restrictions, but if you are, just make sure to follow them in your new 
account). Nobody is required to disclose their old name on a new account 
(WP:RTV), and this is a good counter to the "mud that sticks".

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

