X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jul  2 23:28:24 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A4D2426.4020701@post.pl>
References: <494251.20348.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0906301125r7014ce9se3ef68aef1392490@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4A89FA.7080606@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0906301903m18b58ca9ka3ca5e09bfba4610@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4AE5CF.30609@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0907021152u788ba8c7tb5d6deea37072b6a@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907021155pe07d377v6b10115a67fdb0b7@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0907021159x7147392cp96ebd160280186a7@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907021219j18907539n807d56fbeddfdd9c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4D2426.4020701@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:28:15 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907021428s5997a90as447efda71372cc26@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I know, which is why I co-nominated him for the Lublin
	Ghetto DYK (I asked him if he wanted it first since I wasnt sure if he
	wanted attention brought to himself). But I dunno, these days incivility
	is seen as like the worst thing ever on Wikipedia, right behind running
	sock accounts to circumvent bans (this one's legit in my view) so I
	think he doesn't have a chance in hell off getting parole and even if
	he
	does his personality is just such that he'll soon violate it again.
	Sometimes it's about knowing how to pick your battles. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Hanzo (was Women and Wiklp)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8332589260014985767=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I know, which is why I co-nominated him for the Lublin
	Ghetto DYK (I asked him if he wanted it first since I wasnt sure if he
	wanted attention brought to himself). But I dunno, these days incivility
	is seen as like the worst thing ever on Wikipedia, right behind running
	sock accounts to circumvent bans (this one's legit in my view) so I
	think he doesn't have a chance in hell off getting parole and even if he
	does his personality is just such that he'll soon violate it again.
	Sometimes it's about knowing how to pick your battles. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8332589260014985767==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cfb86b7c8c1046dbfb7a2

--0015175cfb86b7c8c1046dbfb7a2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I know, which is why I co-nominated him for the Lublin Ghetto DYK (I asked
him if he wanted it first since I wasnt sure if he wanted attention brought
to himself).
But I dunno, these days incivility is seen as like the worst thing ever on
Wikipedia, right behind running sock accounts to circumvent bans (this one's
legit in my view) so I think he doesn't have a chance in hell off getting
parole and even if he does his personality is just such that he'll soon
violate it again.
Sometimes it's about knowing how to pick your battles.

Rade

2009/7/2 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>

> radek szulga wrote:
> > I think he is  really good at expressing a lot of the frustration that
> > many of us feel. But that's also why he keeps getting banned. It's an
> > imperfect world. How ok you are with that dictates how you act.
> >
> > I would seriously leave this alone.
>
> The problem is that Hanzo has (and still is, in his socking
> incarnations) creating good content about EE history. He has, for
> example, significantly contributed to articles on Polish-Jewish history
> in WWII, and has done so in a neutral and reasonable manner. Having him
> unblocked would be a major help for when Boody comes back...
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--0015175cfb86b7c8c1046dbfb7a2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I know, which is why I co-nominated him for the Lublin Ghetto DYK (I asked =
him if he wanted it first since I wasnt sure if he wanted attention brought=
 to himself).<br>But I dunno, these days incivility is seen as like the wor=
st thing ever on Wikipedia, right behind running sock accounts to circumven=
t bans (this one&#39;s legit in my view) so I think he doesn&#39;t have a c=
hance in hell off getting parole and even if he does his personality is jus=
t such that he&#39;ll soon violate it again. <br>
Sometimes it&#39;s about knowing how to pick your battles.<br><br>Rade<br><=
br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/2 Piotr Konieczny <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"b=
order-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; paddin=
g-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">radek szulga wrote:<br>
&gt; I think he is =A0really good at expressing a lot of the frustration th=
at<br>
&gt; many of us feel. But that&#39;s also why he keeps getting banned. It&#=
39;s an<br>
&gt; imperfect world. How ok you are with that dictates how you act.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I would seriously leave this alone.<br>
<br>
</div>The problem is that Hanzo has (and still is, in his socking<br>
incarnations) creating good content about EE history. He has, for<br>
example, significantly contributed to articles on Polish-Jewish history<br>
in WWII, and has done so in a neutral and reasonable manner. Having him<br>
unblocked would be a major help for when Boody comes back...<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
</font><div class=3D"im">Piotr Konieczny<br>
<br>
&quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=
<br>
theory.&quot;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">Wikipedia statistics discussion lis=
t<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--0015175cfb86b7c8c1046dbfb7a2--


--===============8332589260014985767==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8332589260014985767==--


