X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:15:53 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906211412u4bb53dadpe3ddaa3845965a62@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211403v2e2b9beep263b646b1188bd4e@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211406l280b7081w8bdd6aa9264193da@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211412u4bb53dadpe3ddaa3845965a62@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:15:41 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906211415l1d08ae9ek26e4fd922f96895e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:12, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes this needs to be brought up at the
	original forum - the arbitrary > unilateral moving around of Piotrus'
	comments as well. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8404353667891471237=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:12, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes this needs to be brought up at the
	original forum - the arbitrary > unilateral moving around of Piotrus'
	comments as well. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8404353667891471237==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a2b38d6d01046ce242c8

--001636c5a2b38d6d01046ce242c8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:12, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes this needs to be brought up at the original forum - the arbitrary
> unilateral moving around of Piotrus' comments as well.


Good.  Please don't be hasty, however.  This is important, and since we
don't have immediate access to Durova or NotACow, Piotrus is the most
experienced person to know anything about this kind of wars.  Please take
into account what he has to say, as soon as he posts it.

The basic problem here is that we're pretending that admins are
> neutral, or as the language goes, "uninvolved" - but this is really
> just another layer of the same dispute the editors have. Somehow
> nobody wants to say this out loud.


True.  You don't say it out loud if you want to win a wikibattle.  Only
fools and loners are allowed to tell the truth.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5a2b38d6d01046ce242c8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:12, radek szulga <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rsszulga@gmail.com<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:=
0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Yes this needs to be brought up at the original forum - the arbitrary<br>
unilateral moving around of Piotrus&#39; comments as well.</blockquote><div=
><br></div><div>Good. =C2=A0Please don&#39;t be hasty, however. =C2=A0This =
is important, and since we don&#39;t have immediate access to Durova or Not=
ACow, Piotrus is the most experienced person to know anything about this ki=
nd of wars. =C2=A0Please take into account what he has to say, as soon as h=
e posts it.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">The basic problem here is th=
at we&#39;re pretending that admins are<br>
neutral, or as the language goes, &quot;uninvolved&quot; - but this is real=
ly<br>
just another layer of the same dispute the editors have. Somehow<br>
nobody wants to say this out loud.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>True. =
=C2=A0You don&#39;t say it out loud if you want to win a wikibattle. =C2=A0=
Only fools and loners are allowed to tell the truth.</div><div><br></div></=
div>-- <br>
Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5a2b38d6d01046ce242c8--


--===============8404353667891471237==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8404353667891471237==--


