X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jul 14 14:52:44 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0907140340u40447a53o429159d8f003d945@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0907140340u40447a53o429159d8f003d945@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:52:29 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0907140552t30225fe8i82c86c41ddd2e660@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 13:40, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Isn't this just a sneaky way to "delete"
	and article one doesn't like w/o > AfD? >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Litvin&diff=next&oldid=301935330
	[...] Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] MK
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2711606783512076762=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 13:40, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Isn't this just a sneaky way to "delete"
	and article one doesn't like w/o > AfD? >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Litvin&diff=next&oldid=301935330
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2711606783512076762==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163662e5c655e2ba046ea9e9ba

--00163662e5c655e2ba046ea9e9ba
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 13:40, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

> Isn't this just a sneaky way to "delete" and article one doesn't like w/o
> AfD?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Litvin&diff=next&oldid=301935330


Yes it is.  In absence of Irpen, most third-party Wikipedians tend to frown
upon such an approach.  If he repeats, this editwar is winnable, and even if
he doesn't, this incident should go to the Black Book.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--00163662e5c655e2ba046ea9e9ba
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 13:40, radek szulga <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rsszulga@gmail.com<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:=
0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Isn&#39;t this just a sneaky way to &quot;delete&quot; and article one does=
n&#39;t like w/o AfD?<br><a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit=
le=3DLitvin&amp;diff=3Dnext&amp;oldid=3D301935330" target=3D"_blank">http:/=
/en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DLitvin&amp;diff=3Dnext&amp;oldid=3D30=
1935330</a></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Yes it is. =C2=A0In absence of Irpen, most third-party =
Wikipedians tend to frown upon such an approach. =C2=A0If he repeats, this =
editwar is winnable, and even if he doesn&#39;t, this incident should go to=
 the Black Book.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--00163662e5c655e2ba046ea9e9ba--


--===============2711606783512076762==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2711606783512076762==--


