X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  9 08:10:37 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f826636f0906081659t5f5043f7u738acfda49376df@mail.gmail.com>
References: <830063.89149.qm@web32802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0906081352i665fc1b2y2e9a3f889621cda5@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2D862A.2090206@post.pl>
	<f826636f0906081659t5f5043f7u738acfda49376df@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:10:14 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906082310t6bd579efud717c93d655fc7ba@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I think "sounding out" means something like "approach
	him carefully and ask him as discretely as possible about whether or
	not
	he might perhaps be interested in joining this group if one actually
	existed, hypothetically speaking of course". Just mention some things
	related to the group and see how he responds ("sounds"). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] More cabal theory
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I think "sounding out" means something like "approach
	him carefully and ask him as discretely as possible about whether or not
	he might perhaps be interested in joining this group if one actually
	existed, hypothetically speaking of course". Just mention some things
	related to the group and see how he responds ("sounds"). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I think "sounding out" means something like "approach him carefully
and ask him as discretely as possible about whether or not he might
perhaps be interested in joining this group if one actually existed,
hypothetically speaking of course". Just mention some things related
to the group and see how he responds ("sounds").

Radek


2009/6/8 Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> While I've had good experience with Hillock, I also vaguely recall he
>> has reached some accommodation with Irpen. Which doesn't have to be
>> anything bad... but I'd start by sounding out Ostap R.
>>
>> Bah, I've mistaken the nick, I wasn't thinking about Hillock - but is he
>> still reading the list?
>
>
> I am sorry, I am afraid I don't follow you. Just to clarify, I don't
> understand:
> 1) what kind of accommodation between Hillock and Irpen?
> 2) "sounding out" OstapR ? means you don't want him (ever/yet) [which is
> absolutely ok if you have a good reason, even if you don't want to share
> that reason with us] or means smth else?
> 3) which nick have you mistaken: Hillock, Hillock65, Ostap, OstapR ? :)
> answer only as many questions that straighten things out, not necessarily
> all 3. :)
> ps i was referring to Hillock's contributions on WP. I believe here he just
> said "hi".
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

