X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jun 27 08:39:15 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d55.53170ae2.37770722@aol.com>
References: <d55.53170ae2.37770722@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:38:57 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906262338md164c65u638f7fd47366a022@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:24,
	<PetersJV@aol.com> wrote: > re: >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thatcher&curid=20763159&diff=298861960&oldid=298833175
	> > Let it play out, see what Thatcher says, we already know 1RR will be
	in > effect for Biophys on any return to WP. Let them just pester
	Thatcher. > /Peters > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Let's give Thatcher some breathing space
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5114833514399529622=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:24, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
	> re: >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thatcher&curid=20763159&diff=298861960&oldid=298833175
	> > Let it play out, see what Thatcher says, we already know 1RR will be
	in > effect for Biophys on any return to WP. Let them just pester
	Thatcher. > /Peters > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5114833514399529622==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b2aa245d41046d4eb6b3

--001636c5b2aa245d41046d4eb6b3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:24, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:

>  re:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thatcher&curid=20763159&diff=298861960&oldid=298833175
>
> Let it play out, see what Thatcher says, we already know 1RR will be in
> effect for Biophys on any return to WP. Let them just pester Thatcher.
> /Peters
>

It's interesting how Thatcher on one hand explains that he sanctioned
everybody involved in the Nashi classification as anti-fascist, and on the
other hand complains that no neutral third party showed up to join in on the
obviousness.  Who's Radek if not a neutral third party?  Besides, if another
neutral third party *had* showed up, Thatcher's "canary theory" would led to
his restriction, as well.

I guess logic is not a job requirement for Wikipedia administrators.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5b2aa245d41046d4eb6b3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:24,  <span dir=3D"ltr=
">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:PetersJV@aol.com">PetersJV@aol.com</a>&gt;</span> w=
rote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;borde=
r-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">




<div style=3D"font-size:10pt;color:#000000;font-family:Arial"><font face=3D=
"Arial" color=3D"#000000" size=3D"2">
<div>re: <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:T=
hatcher&amp;curid=3D20763159&amp;diff=3D298861960&amp;oldid=3D298833175" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Thatc=
her&amp;curid=3D20763159&amp;diff=3D298861960&amp;oldid=3D298833175</a></di=
v>

<div>=C2=A0</div>
<div>Let it play out, see what Thatcher says, we already know 1RR will be i=
n=20
effect for Biophys on any return to WP. Let them just pester Thatcher.=20
/Peters</div></font></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It&#39;s interes=
ting how Thatcher on one hand explains that he sanctioned everybody involve=
d in the Nashi classification as anti-fascist, and on the other hand compla=
ins that no neutral third party showed up to join in on the obviousness. =
=C2=A0Who&#39;s Radek if not a neutral third party? =C2=A0Besides, if anoth=
er neutral third party *had* showed up, Thatcher&#39;s &quot;canary theory&=
quot; would led to his restriction, as well.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I guess logic is not a job requirement for Wikipedia ad=
ministrators.</div><div><br></div><div>--=C2=A0<br></div></div>Andres Soolo=
<br>

--001636c5b2aa245d41046d4eb6b3--


--===============5114833514399529622==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5114833514399529622==--


