X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 23 23:55:51 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A414FDE.8090200@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:57:50 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <c97.457ebc36.37719660@aol.com>
	<25890ca0906231307p6e31fc6fj8cc7f110246ee36d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906231307p6e31fc6fj8cc7f110246ee36d@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I note that Thatcher did not set up a duration on his
	1RR blocks. That's bad, since it prevents one from vanishing with a
	clean (no restrictions) record. I will ask him about that; if he refuses
	to add a lenght to them I suggest that in half a year those of you who
	want to vanish ask for a review of their behavior and lifting of this
	restriction (which should happen if you will not break the 1RR in that
	period), THEN vanish. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] It isn't over.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I note that Thatcher did not set up a duration on his
	1RR blocks. That's bad, since it prevents one from vanishing with a
	clean (no restrictions) record. I will ask him about that; if he refuses
	to add a lenght to them I suggest that in half a year those of you who
	want to vanish ask for a review of their behavior and lifting of this
	restriction (which should happen if you will not break the 1RR in that
	period), THEN vanish. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I note that Thatcher did not set up a duration on his 1RR blocks. That's 
bad, since it prevents one from vanishing with a clean (no restrictions) 
record. I will ask him about that; if he refuses to add a lenght to them 
I suggest that in half a year those of you who want to vanish ask for a 
review of their behavior and lifting of this restriction (which should 
happen if you will not break the 1RR in that period), THEN vanish.

A key argument in Molobo/Gwyn investigation was that CU was approved as 
Molobo was under a 1RR restriction and didn't have the right to vanish 
due to this.

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

