X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:14:20 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A3EA313.9000901@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:16:03 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>	<c3b2b3db0906211358w1eb0730dm77226d89a49f0d58@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211400v198e9443nc9ad234ff6b1cbc5@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906211400v198e9443nc9ad234ff6b1cbc5@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: radek szulga wrote: > This just seems like a crazy
	grab
	for authority that he doesn't have. > Why can he ban you from AE and
	you
	not him? At first I thought he was > a member of ArbCom or something
	but apparently this is all his > initiative. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > This just seems like a crazy grab
	for authority that he doesn't have. > Why can he ban you from AE and you
	not him? At first I thought he was > a member of ArbCom or something but
	apparently this is all his > initiative. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

radek szulga wrote:
> This just seems like a crazy grab for authority that he doesn't have.
> Why can he ban you from AE and you not him? At first I thought he was
> a member of ArbCom or something but apparently this is all his
> initiative.

Indeed. He slightly refactored his comment; I have asked Durova, AGK, 
Sandstein and Shelly to review his pre-refactor comment and the entire 
situation, I'll also have drafted a reply to him but I see no reason to 
post it now (I will be afk for a few hours and review the situation, 
including replies from the editors I contacted, when I am back).

My draft comment I would post to his talk page if I wasn't leaving:

I find this 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APiotrus&diff=297788006&oldid=297787433 
quite uncalled for]. The EE arbcom findings related to me are irrelevant 
here (I am not interacting with Irpen, I am not edit warring and I am 
not using my admin powers). I could say that I find your recent comments 
on AE unhelpful, as well. Such tit-for-tat however is unlikely to solve 
anything. In the spirit of cooperation, acknowledging we all make 
mistakes (including myself) and that you are an experienced admin, I 
would be willing to submit to a wider discussion, in which several 
uninvolved admins (likely regulars at AE would be the best) would review 
my and your comments on this issue and other evidence, and decide 
whether any of us have improperly, and in particular, whether I should 
avoid EE threads at AE, and whether your comments towards me were 
appropriate. --~~~~

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

