X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul 11 21:32:28 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A58E23B.4090206@post.pl>
References: <571846.28820.qm@web45111.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<4A58E23B.4090206@post.pl>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:32:18 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0907111232i4e5f9077m83ad467338863080@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: And a angry responce by Skapperod. Easy to see that he
	can be thrown out of his disguise if pushed hard enough. RfC-I will
	find
	it and sent it over to you guys. We can work on it together. 2009/7/11
	Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>: > Jack wrote: >> Yea, you guys right, 
	I tend to react too quickly. But Skapperod need to >> be dealt with
	eventually. > > Agreed. How are we doing on RfC? I think Molobo had the
	draft? It would > be a good idea to upload it somewhere where we can
	all
	work on it... if > we cannot get a wiki of our own to work, what about
	google docs? > > -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about Wikipedia
	is, that it just works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM]
	=?iso-8859-2?q?Sneaky_blanking_by_Skapperod_in_Ko=B3obrzeg_?=
	=?iso-8859-2?q?article_=28IMPORTANT=29?=
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  And a angry responce by Skapperod. Easy to see that he
	can be thrown out of his disguise if pushed hard enough. RfC-I will find
	it and sent it over to you guys. We can work on it together. 2009/7/11
	Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>: > Jack wrote: >> Yea, you guys right,
	I tend to react too quickly. But Skapperod need to >> be dealt with
	eventually. > > Agreed. How are we doing on RfC? I think Molobo had the
	draft? It would > be a good idea to upload it somewhere where we can all
	work on it... if > we cannot get a wiki of our own to work, what about
	google docs? > > -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about Wikipedia
	is, that it just works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

And a angry responce by Skapperod. Easy to see that he can be thrown
out of his disguise if pushed hard enough.

RfC-I will find it and sent it over to you guys. We can work on it together.

2009/7/11 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> Jack wrote:
>> Yea, you guys right, I tend to react too quickly. But Skapperod need to
>> be dealt with eventually.
>
> Agreed. How are we doing on RfC? I think Molobo had the draft? It would
> be a good idea to upload it somewhere where we can all work on it... if
> we cannot get a wiki of our own to work, what about google docs?
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

