X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  8 01:03:40 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A298034.5010708@post.pl>
References: <4A2625B5.7010705@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906030113r295a1e3as1452b924a5f7a55f@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906031153u6f231517n51cd4e0f21aec4fb@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A296177.9080504@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906051142l29a450f5m46b6f4d739884aff@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A298034.5010708@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 18:03:35 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906071603i5764989dp9451e4f2c76a4a6a@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I think Deacon's recent abuse of his admin's power to
	remove Jacurek's rollback access:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jacurek#Notice_of_rollback_removal_and_editing_restrictions
	when Jacurek used EXACTLY in the way it's supposed to be used is a
	pretty clear example of his continued harassment of Polish editors. If
	his admin action gets reversed, together with other stuff it may be
	enough to at least get him put on the notification list. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Taking on Deacon
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I think Deacon's recent abuse of his admin's power to
	remove Jacurek's rollback access:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jacurek#Notice_of_rollback_removal_and_editing_restrictions
	when Jacurek used EXACTLY in the way it's supposed to be used is a
	pretty clear example of his continued harassment of Polish editors. If
	his admin action gets reversed, together with other stuff it may be
	enough to at least get him put on the notification list. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I think Deacon's recent abuse of his admin's power to remove Jacurek's
rollback access:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jacurek#Notice_of_rollback_removal_a=
nd_editing_restrictions
when Jacurek used EXACTLY in the way it's supposed to be used is a
pretty clear example of his continued harassment of Polish editors.
If his admin action gets reversed, together with other stuff it may be
enough to at least get him put on the notification list.

Radek


2009/6/5 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> radek szulga wrote:
>> Yeah I saw that - be sure to note "Be careful about citing this
>> principle too aggressively. An exhortation to "Assume Good Faith" can
>> itself be seen as a breach of this very tenet, since it fails to
>> assume the assumption of good faith if the perceived assumption of bad
>> faith is not clear-cut." from the guidelines.
>>
>> I'm holding off a little bit on Kurfurst - even though he's annoying
>> on Strategic Bombing I thought I'd give him more time since he seems
>> like one of those editors that sooner or later ends up putting their
>> foot in their mouth and then the case'd be stronger and more straight
>> forward.
>
> He is also annoying some other editors there; there is little harm in
> wikiemailing them to sound them out and later innocently bringing
> WP:DIGWUREN to their attention :)
>
>
> --
> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here." =A0 =A0 |||
> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
> =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

