X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Feb 15 21:39:39 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0902150406u38d165e3k959bfb108e80b6e2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0902150406u38d165e3k959bfb108e80b6e2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:39:32 +0200
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0902151239y68693dcct5a2738f6e5d9a25e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 14:06, Andres Soolo
	<andres.soolo@gmail.com> wrote: > now that I've been blocked for
	non-existing edit warring, I have time to > read the news. > The block
	has been overturned via AN/I consensus, the only opposer being
	Jehochman. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] =?utf-8?q?Nochnoy_Dozor_+_Johan_B=C3=A4ckman_=3D_=3F?=
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8065798939690077886=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.6
X-Spam_score_int: 16
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 14:06, Andres Soolo
	<andres.soolo@gmail.com> wrote: > now that I've been blocked for
	non-existing edit warring, I have time to > read the news. > The block
	has been overturned via AN/I consensus, the only opposer being
	Jehochman. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4983]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8065798939690077886==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163662e5e43d9b3d0462fb111c

--00163662e5e43d9b3d0462fb111c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 14:06, Andres Soolo <andres.soolo@gmail.com> wrote:

> now that I've been blocked for non-existing edit warring, I have time to
> read the news.
>

The block has been overturned via AN/I consensus, the only opposer being
Jehochman.

Publically, I plan to take the position that this is obviously Jehochman
holding grudge against me for voting against him at his (successful) RFA.

Privately, something more complex is going on, and Jehochman may be holding
grudge against me since I criticised Bishonen.  Some signs also indicate
that he might be taking sides randomly, or following some sort of "tough on
wikicriminals" pattern.

Either way, I consider Jehochman dangerous, and will seek to "poison the
well" re his neutrality in a few days.  I hope to make it socially
unacceptable for him to take administrative actions concerning me in the
future.  Ideas are welcome, and somebody please support me when the time
arrives -- because I can't do this alone.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--00163662e5e43d9b3d0462fb111c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 14:06, Andres Soolo <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:andres.soolo@gmail.com">andres.soolo@gm=
ail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D=
"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>now that I&#39;ve been blocked for non-existing edit warring, I have t=
ime to read the news.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The block has b=
een overturned via AN/I consensus, the only opposer being Jehochman.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Publically, I plan to take the position that this is ob=
viously Jehochman holding grudge against me for voting against him at his (=
successful) RFA.</div><div><br></div><div>Privately, something more complex=
 is going on, and Jehochman may be holding grudge against me since I critic=
ised Bishonen. &nbsp;Some signs also indicate that he might be taking sides=
 randomly, or following some sort of &quot;tough on wikicriminals&quot; pat=
tern.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Either way, I consider Jehochman dangerous, and will se=
ek to &quot;poison the well&quot; re his neutrality in a few days. &nbsp;I =
hope to make it socially unacceptable for him to take administrative action=
s concerning me in the future. &nbsp;Ideas are welcome, and somebody please=
 support me when the time arrives -- because I can&#39;t do this alone.</di=
v>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--00163662e5e43d9b3d0462fb111c--


--===============8065798939690077886==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8065798939690077886==--


