X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 19 03:09:50 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A3AD76A.8090306@post.pl>
References: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181257q5ee1749ap4872a277af9b7a6f@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906181304x6fab2980se600cc88f41aaaf8@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181350i5fbd4cc9u41114510a11eab2@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3AD76A.8090306@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:09:29 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0906181809x77124a2dn4fda1f265576d2dc@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Piotrus,
	It seems that any uninvolved administrator can
	decide these cases. Can you or someone you know decide it? If not, an
	educated and neutral comment might help. I do not think that any of
	these Russian editors (O. and PU.) has a significant support from any
	administrators including Hib. and Alex. However, this must look fair
	including a possible restriction or a warning for me. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6624834993516345660=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Piotrus, It seems that any uninvolved administrator can
	decide these cases. Can you or someone you know decide it? If not, an
	educated and neutral comment might help. I do not think that any of
	these Russian editors (O. and PU.) has a significant support from any
	administrators including Hib. and Alex. However, this must look fair
	including a possible restriction or a warning for me. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6624834993516345660==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c76f5216b98046ca92d7c

--0016364c76f5216b98046ca92d7c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Piotrus,

It seems that any uninvolved administrator can decide these cases. Can you
or someone you know decide it?  If not, an educated and neutral comment
might help.

I do not think that any of these Russian editors (O. and PU.)  has a
significant support from any administrators including Hib. and Alex.
However, this must look fair including a possible restriction or a warning
for me.



On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> Andrei Dombay wrote:
> > Agree. No comments unless one has good diffs.
>
> I'd still suggest a short comment denying the accusations, pointing out
> their diffs are baseless, and also importantly pointing out that
> baseless accusations of harassment are harassment themselves and
> contribute to bad faith and battleground creation.
>
> I can always make such a comment and suggest that Offliner and the gang
> be warned/restricted.
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--0016364c76f5216b98046ca92d7c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Piotrus,<br><br>It seems that any uninvolved administrator can decide these=
 cases. Can you or someone you know decide it?=A0 If not, an educated and n=
eutral comment might help. =A0 <br><br>I do not think that any of these Rus=
sian editors (O. and PU.)=A0 has a significant support from any administrat=
ors including Hib. and Alex.=A0 However, this must look fair including a po=
ssible restriction or a warning for me. <br>
<br>=A0<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:10 PM, =
Piotr Konieczny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><=
blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 2=
04, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">Andrei Dombay wrote:<br>
&gt; Agree. No comments unless one has good diffs.<br>
<br>
</div>I&#39;d still suggest a short comment denying the accusations, pointi=
ng out<br>
their diffs are baseless, and also importantly pointing out that<br>
baseless accusations of harassment are harassment themselves and<br>
contribute to bad faith and battleground creation.<br>
<br>
I can always make such a comment and suggest that Offliner and the gang<br>
be warned/restricted.<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
Piotr Konieczny<br>
<br>
&quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=
<br>
theory.&quot;<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--0016364c76f5216b98046ca92d7c--


--===============6624834993516345660==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6624834993516345660==--


