X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun May 31 12:26:18 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A219B5D.7000103@post.pl>
References: <929ed1ec0905300613u1541c0dal63d2972e3f8a5731@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A219B5D.7000103@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 12:25:58 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0905310325i57a1e783wdc1fa701e7a8ca56@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I am not good at this kind of procedural writing,
	thanks
	for all the support guys. The RFC won't be available for some time, real
	life matters I have to attend to do limit my time I can spend writing
	wikipedia. At best I would be able to post it next weekend. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Molobo
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7267021337022266183=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I am not good at this kind of procedural writing, thanks
	for all the support guys. The RFC won't be available for some time, real
	life matters I have to attend to do limit my time I can spend writing
	wikipedia. At best I would be able to post it next weekend. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7267021337022266183==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0adeb4d9aba046b32bc26

--001636e0adeb4d9aba046b32bc26
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I am not good at this kind of procedural writing, thanks for all the support
guys. The RFC won't be available for some time, real life matters I have to
attend to do limit my time I can spend writing wikipedia. At  best I would
be able to post it next weekend.

Regards

2009/5/30 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>

> Digwuren wrote:
> > Avraham has reclassified Molobo's checkuser from "Unlikely" to
> > "Possible".  Other than that, the discussion appears to have wound down.
> >
> > Considering that it's May 30th and Molobo hasn't been banned, is he
> > safe?  Or are any actions needed to reduce his risk?
>
> There are delays, but the "ban Molobo" faction is still doing well. I
> think our best option is to keep insisting that evidence should be made
> public, or at least, available to all admins, since Deacon has it - and
> as a side benefit, keep demanding the answer to why Deacon got it.
>
> Further, I'd like to ask Molobo on the status of his RfC against
> Skapperod; as I said earlier, the sooner it is started, the better.
>
>
> --
> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
>                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
>  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--001636e0adeb4d9aba046b32bc26
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am not good at this kind of procedural writing, thanks for all the suppor=
t guys. The RFC won&#39;t be available for some time, real life matters I h=
ave to attend to do limit my time I can spend writing wikipedia. At=A0 best=
 I would be able to post it next weekend.<br>
<br>Regards<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/5/30 Piotr Konieczny <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_=
quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt =
0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">Digwuren wrote:<br>
&gt; Avraham has reclassified Molobo&#39;s checkuser from &quot;Unlikely&qu=
ot; to<br>
&gt; &quot;Possible&quot;. =A0Other than that, the discussion appears to ha=
ve wound down.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Considering that it&#39;s May 30th and Molobo hasn&#39;t been banned, =
is he<br>
&gt; safe? =A0Or are any actions needed to reduce his risk? <br>
<br>
</div></div>There are delays, but the &quot;ban Molobo&quot; faction is sti=
ll doing well. I<br>
think our best option is to keep insisting that evidence should be made<br>
public, or at least, available to all admins, since Deacon has it - and<br>
as a side benefit, keep demanding the answer to why Deacon got it.<br>
<br>
Further, I&#39;d like to ask Molobo on the status of his RfC against<br>
Skapperod; as I said earlier, the sooner it is started, the better.<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __<br>
 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D&gt;<br>
&quot;Lennier, get us the hell out of here.&quot; =A0 =A0 |||<br>
&quot;Initiating &#39;getting the hell out of here&#39; maneuver.&quot;<br>
 =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:&quot;The Hour of the Wolf&quot;<br=
>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>

--001636e0adeb4d9aba046b32bc26--


--===============7267021337022266183==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7267021337022266183==--


