X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun May  3 13:39:09 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880905021526u5754920bn2611d046157c9c29@mail.gmail.com>
References: <278679.88860.qm@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0905021258w75f05336mbe679fc55b17e1d7@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880905021526u5754920bn2611d046157c9c29@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 14:38:49 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70905030438o181b34dfwfae38da91106ac91@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  yeah, just checked Russavia's comment to your response,
	too. The guy really seems to be enjoying himself there right now ; -] On
	03/05/2009, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at
	5:58 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at
	18:07, Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>
	Nominated for deletion by Offliner, first vote by Krohn 14 minutes
	later! >> >> And obviously trying to lay down a "Offliner can't be PK
	because they >> disagree" defence. This, in itself, is suspicious. > >
	Russavia is probably conflicted now on which way to vote. No doubt he >
	will wait until one of us votes and then will vote the opposite way. >
	So I'm going to hold off voting for the moment, should be >
	entertaining. > > Martin > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list >
	folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Russian influence operations in Estonia
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  yeah, just checked Russavia's comment to your response,
	too. The guy really seems to be enjoying himself there right now ;-] On
	03/05/2009, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at
	5:58 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at
	18:07, Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>
	Nominated for deletion by Offliner, first vote by Krohn 14 minutes
	later! >> >> And obviously trying to lay down a "Offliner can't be PK
	because they >> disagree" defence. This, in itself, is suspicious. > >
	Russavia is probably conflicted now on which way to vote. No doubt he >
	will wait until one of us votes and then will vote the opposite way. >
	So I'm going to hold off voting for the moment, should be >
	entertaining. > > Martin > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list >
	folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

yeah, just checked Russavia's comment to your response, too. The guy
really seems to be enjoying himself there right now  ;-]



On 03/05/2009, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 18:07, Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nominated for deletion by Offliner, first vote by Krohn 14 minutes late=
r!
>>
>> And obviously trying to lay down a "Offliner can't be PK because they
>> disagree" defence. =A0This, in itself, is suspicious.
>
> Russavia is probably conflicted now on which way to vote. No doubt he
> will wait until one of us votes and then will vote the opposite way.
> So I'm going to hold off voting for the moment, should be
> entertaining.
>
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

