X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 16:19:39 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906202028s9291ce7webaed4493229aedb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c39.57b57f3e.376ee266@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906202028s9291ce7webaed4493229aedb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:19:21 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70906210719u3ac8b9b3l9f28443cce3dabe2@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  In 2007, summer,
	Jehochmann was just a regular user and
	he regularly showed up during the disputes with the then-mighty
	CyberSSSR gang, J. always supporting the latter grouping. He clearly
	can't be a 'neutral admin' here. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Well, there goes another weekend, the latest AE
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  In 2007, summer, Jehochmann was just a regular user and
	he regularly showed up during the disputes with the then-mighty
	CyberSSSR gang, J. always supporting the latter grouping. He clearly
	can't be a 'neutral admin' here. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

In 2007, summer, Jehochmann was just a regular user and he regularly
showed up during the disputes with the then-mighty CyberSSSR gang, J.
always supporting the latter grouping. He clearly can't be a 'neutral
admin' here.

M.

On 21/06/2009, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:
> Peters,
>
> Thank you for help! But you should write much shorter if you want admins to
> read your texts. BF4 has been restricted, thanks to Colchicum. Let's wait
> further developments.
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:09 PM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>  In a message dated 6/20/2009 8:10:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> digwuren@gmail.com writes:
>>
>> Can we argue that Jehochman only changed his mind to deliberately create a
>> disagreement of administrators after FloNight pointed out that there
>> wasn't
>> one?
>>
>>  There's a little admin side conversation on the talk page. I've suggested
>> that admins acting precipitously based on complaints from individuals
>> makes
>> them a co-belligerent in the conflict. Uggh. I'm taking a Wikibreak
>> tomorrow. I'll check mail now and then just in case.
>> /Peters
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
>> steps!<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585064x1201462784/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=JunestepsfooterNO62>
>> *
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

