X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul 11 18:42:35 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A58BE06.7040303@post.pl>
References: <4A5609E5.1070902@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0907100315i22e7cad6y38f3256b17f478f8@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A58BE06.7040303@post.pl>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:42:22 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0907110942h18a65afetdb3ffe21dff95ebb@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 19:29, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > > If we were dealing with a real
	encyclopædia, consistency with sources > > would indubitably be of
	higher priority than naming consistency between > > these topics. Naming
	consistency would be the encyclopædia's team to > > decide only if
	there were no dominant names for these concepts in the > > applicable
	sources. > > Well, in this case we run into a problem that the term
	"repatriation" is > most often used in English sources when it comes to
	Polish population > transfers, but is quite incorrect, as repatriation
	was only part of that > transfer, which involved a lot of deportations
	as well. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Expulsion/repatriation/transfer of Poles after WWII
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5381400454434692529=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 19:29, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > > If we were dealing with a real
	encyclopædia, consistency with sources > > would indubitably be of
	higher priority than naming consistency between > > these topics. Naming
	consistency would be the encyclopædia's team to > > decide only if
	there were no dominant names for these concepts in the > > applicable
	sources. > > Well, in this case we run into a problem that the term
	"repatriation" is > most often used in English sources when it comes to
	Polish population > transfers, but is quite incorrect, as repatriation
	was only part of that > transfer, which involved a lot of deportations
	as well. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5381400454434692529==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b3e2e89457046e70c57c

--001636c5b3e2e89457046e70c57c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 19:29, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> > If we were dealing with a real encyclop=C3=A6dia, consistency with sour=
ces
> > would indubitably be of higher priority than naming consistency between
> > these topics.  Naming consistency would be the encyclop=C3=A6dia's team=
 to
> > decide only if there were no dominant names for these concepts in the
> > applicable sources.
>
> Well, in this case we run into a problem that the term "repatriation" is
> most often used in English sources when it comes to Polish population
> transfers, but is quite incorrect, as repatriation was only part of that
> transfer, which involved a lot of deportations as well.


Ideally, we could explain it in the article(s).  But with wikipolitics, it'=
s
going to get messy.

--=20
Andres Soolo

--001636c5b3e2e89457046e70c57c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 19:29, Piotr Konieczny <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">&gt; If we were dealing with a real encyclop=C3=A6dia, co=
nsistency with sources<br>
&gt; would indubitably be of higher priority than naming consistency betwee=
n<br>
&gt; these topics. =C2=A0Naming consistency would be the encyclop=C3=A6dia&=
#39;s team to<br>
&gt; decide only if there were no dominant names for these concepts in the<=
br>
&gt; applicable sources.<br>
<br>
</div>Well, in this case we run into a problem that the term &quot;repatria=
tion&quot; is<br>
most often used in English sources when it comes to Polish population<br>
transfers, but is quite incorrect, as repatriation was only part of that<br=
>
transfer, which involved a lot of deportations as well.</blockquote><div><b=
r></div><div>Ideally, we could explain it in the article(s). =C2=A0But with=
 wikipolitics, it&#39;s going to get messy.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <b=
r>
Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5b3e2e89457046e70c57c--


--===============5381400454434692529==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5381400454434692529==--


