X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 02:03:01 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
From: PetersJV@aol.com
Message-ID: <d4e.533171f6.376ed299@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:02:33 EDT
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5377
X-AOL-IP: 205.188.169.202
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  In a message dated 6/20/2009 7:07:18 P.M. Eastern
	Daylight Time, wikibiophys@gmail.com writes: No, please. Things are
	becoming complicated. The disagreement of admins (S who closed the case
	and J who reopened the case and used sanctions) is a reason for
	starting
	the Arbom case that we all commented about (see comment by FloNight in
	Arbcom case). Piotrus is another admin who happens to disagree... I
	would wait. I also have some strong personal reasons to stop completely
	doing anything with WP and focus 100% on my real work. I will try to
	pause a day and see if he actually issues me a restriction, and then
	appleal if needed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.0 NO_REAL_NAME           From: does not include a real name
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_40_50,
	HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Well, there goes another weekend, the latest AE
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2817259252433243779=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  In a message dated 6/20/2009 7:07:18 P.M. Eastern
	Daylight Time, wikibiophys@gmail.com writes: No, please. Things are
	becoming complicated. The disagreement of admins (S who closed the case
	and J who reopened the case and used sanctions) is a reason for starting
	the Arbom case that we all commented about (see comment by FloNight in
	Arbcom case). Piotrus is another admin who happens to disagree... I
	would wait. I also have some strong personal reasons to stop completely
	doing anything with WP and focus 100% on my real work. I will try to
	pause a day and see if he actually issues me a restriction, and then
	appleal if needed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.0 NO_REAL_NAME           From: does not include a real name
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============2817259252433243779==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1245542553"


-------------------------------1245542553
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 
In a message dated 6/20/2009 7:07:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
wikibiophys@gmail.com writes:

No,  please. Things are becoming complicated. The disagreement of admins (S 
who  closed the case and J who reopened the case and used sanctions) is a 
reason  for starting the  Arbom case that we all commented about (see comment 
by  FloNight in Arbcom case).  Piotrus is another admin who happens to  
disagree...  I would wait. I also have some strong personal reasons to  stop 
completely doing anything with WP and focus 100% on my real work. I will  try 
to pause a day and see if he actually issues me a restriction, and then  
appleal if needed. 



Hello, Biophys...
I fully agree, you've reached out and been summarily ignored and rebuffed.  
I would wait to see what specifics come out. I'm not happy about wasting my 
 weekend here, but things being what they are, I've made my comment to J. 
that he  delist himself as originator, that Offliner be listed, and that we 
not have  arbitration by proxy.
I tried to express my confusion about J's involvement, etc. as  
good-faithfully as I could.
/Peters
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585064x1201462784/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=
JunestepsfooterNO62)

-------------------------------1245542553
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=3Drole_body style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY=
: Arial" 
bottomMargin=3D7 leftMargin=3D7 topMargin=3D7 rightMargin=3D7><FONT id=3Dr=
ole_document 
face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 6/20/2009 7:07:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
wikibiophys@gmail.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"=
><FONT 
  style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 siz=
e=3D2>No, 
  please. Things are becoming complicated. The disagreement of admins (S=
 who 
  closed the case and J who reopened the case and used sanctions) is a rea=
son 
  for starting the&nbsp; Arbom case that we all commented about (see comme=
nt by 
  FloNight in Arbcom case).&nbsp; Piotrus is another admin who happens to=
 
  disagree...&nbsp; I would wait. I also have some strong personal reasons=
 to 
  stop completely doing anything with WP and focus 100% on my real work.=
 I will 
  try to pause a day and see if he actually issues me a restriction, and=
 then 
  appleal if needed. <BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Hello, Biophys...</DIV>
<DIV>I fully agree, you've reached out and been summarily ignored and rebu=
ffed. 
I would wait to see what specifics come out. I'm not happy about wasting=
 my 
weekend here, but things being what they are, I've made my comment to J.=
 that he 
delist himself as originator, that Offliner be listed, and that we not hav=
e 
arbitration by proxy.</DIV>
<DIV>I tried to express my confusion about J's involvement, etc. as 
good-faithfully as I could.</DIV>
<DIV>/Peters</DIV></FONT><DIV CLASS=3D"aol_ad_footer" ID=3D"48bd5ca7a78232=
98c7b7ccd8f83d52c3"><br/><font style=3D"color:black;font:normal 10pt arial=
,san-serif;"> <hr style=3D"margin-top:10px"/><B>A Good Credit Score is 700=
 or Above. <A HREF=3Dhttp://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585064x12=
01462784/aol?redir=3Dhttp://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=3D=
668072%26hmpgID=3D62%26bcd=3DJunestepsfooterNO62>See yours in just 2 easy=
 steps!</A></B></font></DIV></BODY></HTML>

-------------------------------1245542553--


--===============2817259252433243779==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2817259252433243779==--


