X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Mar 24 19:39:23 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <855174.24246.qm@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: CLGq1RkVM1nLvSB86da0MJAzxPo.zbD4uYrV58WGKNoyymUROvKK1IeSMGaSNxTPKxCpvAsK9MUJZGahyAx9Cn7VmmH7CJdqLt.4GD_paF_KJcxzYjypoEahxHemT9FoUw0mD1qsH_Gmst0Q_eiul8ALBajZ71EpAlE8VJbZ8XJOtK.xXHsCmStVJzLjEng1fIrvb8IpmWLcFLUUlJfT1DxkdN3Lq2EMeGA-
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.1.20 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I think Biophys should've been invited long ago. He's
	a
	bit odd (well, that's hardly unique on Wikipedia), but seems to share
	our agenda in full. And losing him would be a big negative, so anything
	to keep him on board is worth trying. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] Biophys & off-topic request
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.6
X-Spam_score_int: 16
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I think Biophys should've been invited long ago. He's a
	bit odd (well, that's hardly unique on Wikipedia), but seems to share
	our agenda in full. And losing him would be a big negative, so anything
	to keep him on board is worth trying. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.5000]
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


I think Biophys should've been invited long ago. He's a bit odd (well, that's hardly unique on Wikipedia), but seems to share our agenda in full. And losing him would be a big negative, so anything to keep him on board is worth trying.

***

I also have a vote you should take a look at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_March_24#Venetian_people .

I think this is pretty clear-cut: the article was junk, the consensus for deletion was clear, etc. At best, redirect and protect, but even that isn't really needed.

Many thanks,

Cristian


      

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

