X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 16 02:50:06 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880906151614g3b638a6ag8567f142e049b263@mail.gmail.com>
References: <760616.75782.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<4f045a880906151614g3b638a6ag8567f142e049b263@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:49:53 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70906151749n408b56edqaf5770d35f7653f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Fully agree. Alternatively,
	Post-Communist parties could
	be an option, if the first one won't pass. M. On 16/06/2009, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, there is definitely a need for
	[[Category:Communist successor > parties]]. Good catch. > > On Tue, Jun
	16, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Christian > Suciu<christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote:
	>> It's probably no coincidence that because of its pre-war
	parliamentary >> experience, which helped legitimise it as an authentic
	workers' movement >> rather than purely a fanatical sect and then a
	mechanism of Soviet >> occupation, that it is in the Czech Republic
	(and, to a lesser extent, >> Slovakia) that one finds the only
	non-fringe Communist party in Eastern >> Europe today (outside the
	former USSR). To one degree or another, other >> Communist successor
	parties (The Left in Germany, the PSD, SLD, MSZP, >> PSSH, >> BSP in
	Romania, Poland, Hungary, Albania and Bulgaria respectively) have >>
	tried to distance themselves from the "Communist" label. Serbia's >>
	Socialist >> Party may be an exception. I'm a little surprised there's
	no >> [[Category:Communist successor parties]], especially when sources
	are >> readily available to document them as such. >>
	(http://books.google.com/books?id=55Fi2axLbnkC&pg=PA271) >> >> >>
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> >> > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] PS
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Fully agree. Alternatively, Post-Communist parties could
	be an option, if the first one won't pass. M. On 16/06/2009, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, there is definitely a need for
	[[Category:Communist successor > parties]]. Good catch. > > On Tue, Jun
	16, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Christian > Suciu<christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote:
	>> It's probably no coincidence that because of its pre-war
	parliamentary >> experience, which helped legitimise it as an authentic
	workers' movement >> rather than purely a fanatical sect and then a
	mechanism of Soviet >> occupation, that it is in the Czech Republic
	(and, to a lesser extent, >> Slovakia) that one finds the only
	non-fringe Communist party in Eastern >> Europe today (outside the
	former USSR). To one degree or another, other >> Communist successor
	parties (The Left in Germany, the PSD, SLD, MSZP, >> PSSH, >> BSP in
	Romania, Poland, Hungary, Albania and Bulgaria respectively) have >>
	tried to distance themselves from the "Communist" label. Serbia's >>
	Socialist >> Party may be an exception. I'm a little surprised there's
	no >> [[Category:Communist successor parties]], especially when sources
	are >> readily available to document them as such. >>
	(http://books.google.com/books?id=55Fi2axLbnkC&pg=PA271) >> >> >>
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> >> > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Fully agree. Alternatively, Post-Communist parties could be an option,
if the first one won't pass.

M.

On 16/06/2009, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, there is definitely a need for [[Category:Communist successor
> parties]]. Good catch.
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Christian
> Suciu<christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> It's probably no coincidence that because of its pre-war parliamentary
>> experience, which helped legitimise it as an authentic workers' movement
>> rather than purely a fanatical sect and then a mechanism of Soviet
>> occupation, that it is in the Czech Republic (and, to a lesser extent,
>> Slovakia) that one finds the only non-fringe Communist party in Eastern
>> Europe today (outside the former USSR). To one degree or another, other
>> Communist successor parties (The Left in Germany, the PSD, SLD, MSZP,
>> PSSH,
>> BSP in Romania, Poland, Hungary, Albania and Bulgaria respectively) have
>> tried to distance themselves from the "Communist" label. Serbia's
>> Socialist
>> Party may be an exception. I'm a little surprised there's no
>> [[Category:Communist successor parties]], especially when sources are
>> readily available to document them as such.
>> (http://books.google.com/books?id=55Fi2axLbnkC&pg=PA271)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

