X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 16 15:02:10 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <439330.19747.qm@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <439330.19747.qm@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:01:47 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0906160601o31b3615bv2248dff7148882ea@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Christian, since you are probably following this issue
	(Macedonia), could you please let us know when the expected discussion
	about usage of names (part of the ArbCom ruling) would be set up. (I
	don't even know where to search about it, except reading in the ArbCom
	ruling, which is in the future tense) I would be quite curious to follow
	it. Thank you, Dorin [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Arbcom finding
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4016957195464668587=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Christian, since you are probably following this issue
	(Macedonia), could you please let us know when the expected discussion
	about usage of names (part of the ArbCom ruling) would be set up. (I
	don't even know where to search about it, except reading in the ArbCom
	ruling, which is in the future tense) I would be quite curious to follow
	it. Thank you, Dorin [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4016957195464668587==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502dfc50574b2046c76c7af

--00504502dfc50574b2046c76c7af
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christian, since you are probably following this issue (Macedonia), could
you please let us know when the expected discussion about usage of
names (part of the ArbCom ruling) would be set up. (I don't even know where
to search about it, except reading in the ArbCom ruling, which is in the
future tense) I would be quite curious to follow it. Thank you, Dorin

2009/6/16 Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>

> From the recent Macedonia 2 case, a principle that I'm sure could be
> extended to Eastern Europe as well:
> It is potentially harmful to Wikipedia when editorial debates become
> strongly associated with real-world political polarizations and when they
> become dominated by groups of editors lined up along political lines due to
> shared national backgrounds. This is particularly harmful when such editors
> act in concert to systematically advocate editorial decisions considered
> favorable to their shared political views that contravene the application of
> Wikipedia policy or obstruct consensus-building. Mere strength of numbers is
> not sufficient to contravene Wikipedia policy. Defending editorial positions
> that support political preferences typical of a particular national
> background is not ipso facto evidence of bad-faith editing.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--00504502dfc50574b2046c76c7af
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Christian, since you are probably following this issue (Macedonia), could y=
ou please let us know when the expected discussion=A0about usage of names=
=A0(part of the ArbCom ruling) would be set up. (I don&#39;t even know wher=
e to search about it, except reading in the ArbCom ruling, which is in the =
future tense) I would be quite curious to follow it. Thank you, Dorin<br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/6/16 Christian Suciu <span dir=3D"ltr">=
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:christiansuciu@yahoo.com">christiansuciu@yahoo.com</a=
>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8e=
x;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0"><tbody><tr><td vali=
gn=3D"top" style=3D"font:inherit">From the recent <span style=3D"font-style=
:italic">Macedonia 2</span> case, a principle that I&#39;m sure could be ex=
tended to Eastern Europe as well:<div>
<br></div><div>It is potentially harmful to Wikipedia when editorial debate=
s become strongly associated with real-world political polarizations and wh=
en they become dominated by groups of editors lined up along political line=
s due to shared national backgrounds. This is particularly harmful when suc=
h editors act in concert to systematically advocate editorial decisions con=
sidered favorable to their shared political views that contravene the appli=
cation of Wikipedia policy or obstruct consensus-building. Mere strength of=
 numbers is not sufficient to contravene Wikipedia policy. Defending editor=
ial positions that support political preferences typical of a particular na=
tional background is
 not <span style=3D"font-style:italic">ipso facto</span> evidence of bad-fa=
ith editing.<br></div></td></tr></tbody></table><br>



      <br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--00504502dfc50574b2046c76c7af--


--===============4016957195464668587==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4016957195464668587==--


