X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed May 27 22:52:34 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A1D9D29.5020807@post.pl>
References: <6c9a05ec0905231259r4ffb1fa7i350386b8cd565ea@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0905240459g618ce5bbod4c4be35baa9d4df@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880905241413v2e69659dt38897431bfaa4f9a@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A1B0B07.8070607@post.pl> <4A1C2981.5070801@post.pl>
	<25890ca0905261104q5c8255esa31cff6978356cdf@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A1C5890.7070103@post.pl>
	<4f045a880905261543v482cac2ew3343341990304cb6@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A1D9D29.5020807@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 23:52:25 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0905271352v6b958075u91186ea8b897abac@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 23:06, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Please note that Radeksz and Marting
	questions
	about how Deacon received > the evidence and requests that they should
	be turned over to me were > REMOVED: > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Molobo&diff=292608408&oldid=292593075
	> without a comment! [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon and Molobo
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6470446203708136587=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 23:06, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Please note that Radeksz and Marting questions
	about how Deacon received > the evidence and requests that they should
	be turned over to me were > REMOVED: > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Molobo&diff=292608408&oldid=292593075
	> without a comment! [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6470446203708136587==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de04e144c158046aeb05eb

--0016e6de04e144c158046aeb05eb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 23:06, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> Please note that Radeksz and Marting questions about how Deacon received
> the evidence and requests that they should be turned over to me were
> REMOVED:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Molobo&diff=292608408&oldid=292593075
> without a comment!


I'd say most likely it's because he's afraid that the secret checkuser
processes might become public.  It's not an uncommon concern, and different
checkuser people have it at different levels.

I think we should reinsert the comments, start a fuss on the talk page,
> repeating the above requests, and asking how such an important requests
> were removed without a comment. I will join soon with an official
> request to look at the evidence.


If we're going to make a fuss, we should probably most importantly get more
eyeballs to review the issue.  Among the obvious benefits, more checkuser
folks means more people who might be less inclined to share a high level of
this fear.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6de04e144c158046aeb05eb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 23:06, Piotr Konieczny <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
Please note that Radeksz and Marting questions about how Deacon received<br=
>
the evidence and requests that they should be turned over to me were<br>
REMOVED:<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Sockpuppet=
_investigations/Molobo&amp;diff=3D292608408&amp;oldid=3D292593075" target=
=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Sockpuppe=
t_investigations/Molobo&amp;diff=3D292608408&amp;oldid=3D292593075</a><br>

without a comment!</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I&#39;d say most likely =
it&#39;s because he&#39;s afraid that the secret checkuser processes might =
become public. =C2=A0It&#39;s not an uncommon concern, and different checku=
ser people have it at different levels.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I think we should reinsert t=
he comments, start a fuss on the talk page,<br>
repeating the above requests, and asking how such an important requests<br>
were removed without a comment. I will join soon with an official<br>
request to look at the evidence.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>If we&#39;=
re going to make a fuss, we should probably most importantly get more eyeba=
lls to review the issue. =C2=A0Among the obvious benefits, more checkuser f=
olks means more people who might be less inclined to share a high level of =
this fear.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e6de04e144c158046aeb05eb--


--===============6470446203708136587==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6470446203708136587==--


