X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul 31 18:35:51 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A731D87.8030105@post.pl>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:36:23 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <628973.19764.qm@web32801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	<736779.88675.qm@web45107.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>	<BAY110-W372FEBBA66EC2D6A27A1B8D6100@phx.gbl>	<4A72949A.3000000@post.pl>
	<207274cd0907310011q11725e91l571921c1e0775daa@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <207274cd0907310011q11725e91l571921c1e0775daa@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Ostap R wrote: > Piotrus, I considered his constant
	personal attacks to be unacceptable. > I did not know that Poeticbent
	was here. Please do not withdraw since > this goup needs you. Nothing
	here really relates to my activity on > Wikipedia, so please take me out
	instead. I find your comment rather > offensive, I am not a dishonest
	person. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] HELP!! Radek , Piotrus, Tymek and others.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Ostap R wrote: > Piotrus, I considered his constant
	personal attacks to be unacceptable. > I did not know that Poeticbent
	was here. Please do not withdraw since > this goup needs you. Nothing
	here really relates to my activity on > Wikipedia, so please take me out
	instead. I find your comment rather > offensive, I am not a dishonest
	person. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Ostap R wrote:

> Piotrus, I considered his constant personal attacks to be unacceptable.  
> I did not know that Poeticbent was here.  Please do not withdraw since 
> this goup needs you.  Nothing here really relates to my activity on 
> Wikipedia, so please take me out instead.   I find your comment rather 
> offensive, I am not a dishonest person. 

If there were personal attacks, why not inform me about them on my talk 
page or via here? I'd have stepped in :(

I stand by what I said: if members of our group fight publicly on wiki, 
involving admins, invoking ArbCom and asking for bans to one another, I 
don't know how far this will go. And for the record, I am blaming both 
sides, not just you, for this escalation (poetic was editwarring with 
faustian, and you added oil to the flames).

If you can convince Faustian to withdraw his report, refactor your 
comment, and all involved users agree to 1RR on that article, we could 
work something out. Reporting one another to 3RR is - I hope nobody will 
be too much offended by this metaphor - a wiki way of continuing a 
stupid blood feud that should have died half a century ago.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

