X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 12 09:39:53 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906111626l6a035ac7le73772a6549958fa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <250142.35491.qm@web32803.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<25890ca0906111626l6a035ac7le73772a6549958fa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:39:34 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906120039x63624f04p6d22967002c45994@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 02:26, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > This seems shocking to me too - I haven't
	seen stuff like this before. > Two week block for basically a
	misunderstanding with threats of an > indef ban because basically an
	admin's ego was bruised. And yet we > always keep hearing about how
	admins are "just regular editors" with a > bit more responsibility.
	[...] Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] blocked
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4703404608812366562=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 02:26, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > This seems shocking to me too - I haven't
	seen stuff like this before. > Two week block for basically a
	misunderstanding with threats of an > indef ban because basically an
	admin's ego was bruised. And yet we > always keep hearing about how
	admins are "just regular editors" with a > bit more responsibility.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4703404608812366562==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a66f4d4e11046c21cf5b

--001636c5a66f4d4e11046c21cf5b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 02:26, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

> This seems shocking to me too - I haven't seen stuff like this before.
> Two week block for basically a misunderstanding with threats of an
> indef ban because basically an admin's ego was bruised. And yet we
> always keep hearing about how admins are "just regular editors" with a
> bit more responsibility.


It was not about reverting an administrator.  Vicenarian is not one; he's
merely a hit-and-run deletionist.  He strokes his ego by watching
RecentChanges, reverting "vandalism" and slapping deletion notices to every
created article he can.  Since he competes against other people like him --
there are many of them -- he has to add deletion tag as quickly as possible,
or somebody else might do it before him.  And, as usual in the feedback
systems of Wikipedia, adding silly and useless deletion tags in this manner
is socially rewarded; doing critical assessment of what should be deleted
and what not earns you nothing.

Since Vicenarian is not an administrator, he didn't block me himself.
 Instead, he reported me on WP:AIV, where administrators go when their
block-finger itches.  From their side, it's like block shopping, except in
reverse.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5a66f4d4e11046c21cf5b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 02:26, radek szulga <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rsszulga@gmail.com<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:=
0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
This seems shocking to me too - I haven&#39;t seen stuff like this before.<=
br>
Two week block for basically a misunderstanding with threats of an<br>
indef ban because basically an admin&#39;s ego was bruised. And yet we<br>
always keep hearing about how admins are &quot;just regular editors&quot; w=
ith a<br>
bit more responsibility.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>It was not about r=
everting an administrator. =C2=A0Vicenarian is not one; he&#39;s merely a h=
it-and-run deletionist. =C2=A0He strokes his ego by watching RecentChanges,=
 reverting &quot;vandalism&quot; and slapping deletion notices to every cre=
ated article he can. =C2=A0Since he competes against other people like him =
-- there are many of them -- he has to add deletion tag as quickly as possi=
ble, or somebody else might do it before him. =C2=A0And, as usual in the fe=
edback systems of Wikipedia, adding silly and useless deletion tags in this=
 manner is socially rewarded; doing critical assessment of what should be d=
eleted and what not earns you nothing.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Since Vicenarian is not an administrator, he didn&#39;t=
 block me himself. =C2=A0Instead, he reported me on WP:AIV, where administr=
ators go when their block-finger itches. =C2=A0From their side, it&#39;s li=
ke block shopping, except in reverse.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5a66f4d4e11046c21cf5b--


--===============4703404608812366562==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4703404608812366562==--


