X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jun 20 04:52:53 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ca3.534dabe2.376d98de@aol.com>
References: <ca3.534dabe2.376d98de@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:52:33 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880906191952h2c73b422w3e746cce1bf2ed5f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi Peters, Your first entry on the ArbCom page is
	excellent, but you might want to refactor your two subsequent entries, 
	as it reads a bit combative, particularly the clerk's question about
	naming, and "Arbcom frustration". It is only Jehochmen expressing
	frustration, the issue with him seems to be timorousness in applying
	discretionary sanctions (has he ever) and trying to offload back to
	ArbCom, which begs the question if he is so timorous, why is he doing AE
	duty. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] It isn't over.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi Peters, Your first entry on the ArbCom page is
	excellent, but you might want to refactor your two subsequent entries,
	as it reads a bit combative, particularly the clerk's question about
	naming, and "Arbcom frustration". It is only Jehochmen expressing
	frustration, the issue with him seems to be timorousness in applying
	discretionary sanctions (has he ever) and trying to offload back to
	ArbCom, which begs the question if he is so timorous, why is he doing AE
	duty. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Hi Peters,

Your first entry on the ArbCom page is excellent, but you might want
to refactor your two subsequent entries, as it reads a bit combative,
particularly the clerk's question about naming, and "Arbcom
frustration". It is only Jehochmen expressing frustration, the issue
with him seems to be timorousness in applying discretionary sanctions
(has he ever) and trying to offload back to ArbCom, which begs the
question if he is so timorous, why is he doing AE duty.

Sandstein in contrast has no problems using sanctions and is doing a great job.

Martin

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:43 AM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
> Let them come to us.
>
> Patience all. We have outlasted others, we will outlast the latest pack too.
> Let them be the ones on the attack. Sticking to reputable sources always
> eventually forces them to step over the line to push their POV as equally
> valid.
>
> /Peters
> ________________________________
> Dell Inspiron 15: Now starting at $349
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

