X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:18:01 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906211414m3e911be3pa3e8d1e903b40c01@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211403v2e2b9beep263b646b1188bd4e@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211406l280b7081w8bdd6aa9264193da@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211410w74194a4fi69f89ae4116ad6d8@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211414m3e911be3pa3e8d1e903b40c01@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:17:48 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906211417m3e8fa2a2wd3f08cc90f1d5c06@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:14, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure (though, given my limited time, I was
	trying to fly this one > under the radar) - but where exactly, since
	this has spread and > there's talk of places only admins can comment.
	Also I think Piotrus > should first innocently inquire about what
	exactly is going on here? > Just act puzzled and surprised and
	disappointed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1679944138111739292=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:14, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure (though, given my limited time, I was
	trying to fly this one > under the radar) - but where exactly, since
	this has spread and > there's talk of places only admins can comment.
	Also I think Piotrus > should first innocently inquire about what
	exactly is going on here? > Just act puzzled and surprised and
	disappointed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1679944138111739292==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5aa861b1979046ce24ae9

--001636c5aa861b1979046ce24ae9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:14, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sure (though, given my limited time, I was trying to fly this one
> under the radar) - but where exactly, since this has spread and
> there's talk of places only admins can comment. Also I think Piotrus
> should first innocently inquire about what exactly is going on here?
> Just act puzzled and surprised and disappointed.


One of the benefits of not being alone is that we don't have to do only one
thing alone.  We can go multiple approaches in parallel; even conflicting
approaches.  For example, somebody else might file an ArbCom request in
parallel, if we decide it's, too, a good way to do.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5aa861b1979046ce24ae9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:14, radek szulga <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rsszulga@gmail.com<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:=
0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Sure (though, given my limited time, I was trying to fly this one<br>
under the radar) - but where exactly, since this has spread and<br>
there&#39;s talk of places only admins can comment. Also I think Piotrus<br=
>
should first innocently inquire about what exactly is going on here?<br>
Just act puzzled and surprised and disappointed.</blockquote><div><br></div=
><div>One of the benefits of not being alone is that we don&#39;t have to d=
o only one thing alone. =C2=A0We can go multiple approaches in parallel; ev=
en conflicting approaches. =C2=A0For example, somebody else might file an A=
rbCom request in parallel, if we decide it&#39;s, too, a good way to do.</d=
iv>
<div><br></div><div><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-size: 19=
px; ">--=C2=A0</span><br></div></div>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5aa861b1979046ce24ae9--


--===============1679944138111739292==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1679944138111739292==--


