X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 21:12:01 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A3E8080.8080308@post.pl>
References: <6c9a05ec0906201203s394948s4228e33c3e0cd150@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906201314u506cbbdbhb300282e944d5580@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3E5E07.4090408@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906211052g420b1eccnd261156a0d303bbb@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3E8080.8080308@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:11:50 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211211t5d42979el2c901a3ca6677b0f@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I've thought about this - contacting Malik through
	Wiki
	email to raise up this very issue - as well. I haven't done it because
	I
	think it's still too early (I think Boodles' ban expires in November).
	But when the time comes I'll probably write him. The other person here
	would be Jayg, who's also completely dropped out out of Poland related
	articles once Boodles got banned - which suggests that he got pulled
	into the fight, got caught up in it (and said some nasty things), but in
	the end didn't have that much at stake. It'd probably not be a good
	idea
	to contact him but watching the articles he edits and throwing a
	favorable revert to his version once or twice might make him more
	amiable in the future (I think he mostly edits Palestinian-Israeli
	stuff
	which people have strong opinions about so this may not be right for
	everyone either) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Aron Bielski/Christian Bale
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I've thought about this - contacting Malik through Wiki
	email to raise up this very issue - as well. I haven't done it because I
	think it's still too early (I think Boodles' ban expires in November).
	But when the time comes I'll probably write him. The other person here
	would be Jayg, who's also completely dropped out out of Poland related
	articles once Boodles got banned - which suggests that he got pulled
	into the fight, got caught up in it (and said some nasty things), but in
	the end didn't have that much at stake. It'd probably not be a good idea
	to contact him but watching the articles he edits and throwing a
	favorable revert to his version once or twice might make him more
	amiable in the future (I think he mostly edits Palestinian-Israeli stuff
	which people have strong opinions about so this may not be right for
	everyone either) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I've thought about this - contacting Malik through Wiki email to raise
up this very issue - as well. I haven't done it because I think it's
still too early (I think Boodles' ban expires in November). But when
the time comes I'll probably write him. The other person here would be
Jayg, who's also completely dropped out out of Poland related articles
once Boodles got banned - which suggests that he got pulled into the
fight, got caught up in it (and said some nasty things), but in the
end didn't have that much at stake. It'd probably not be a good idea
to contact him but watching the articles he edits and throwing a
favorable revert to his version once or twice might make him more
amiable in the future (I think he mostly edits Palestinian-Israeli
stuff which people have strong opinions about so this may not be right
for everyone either)

Radek


2009/6/21 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> radek szulga wrote:
>
>> It'd
>> be nice if and when Boodles comes back, he finds himself without the
>> support of other editors that he dragged along into all the battles
>> before - I don't think this is realistic with respect to Moordoor but
>> others, like Malik Shabazz, seem like reasonable fellows.
>
> Cultivating good relationship with Malik, who seems reasonable but was
> somewhat radicalized by Boody, would be a good idea, so that when
> Boody's back, Malik will not revert to his supporter. Perhaps one of us
> could even start a discussion with Malik about Boody, to sense him out?
>
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

