X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  2 10:40:25 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880906011904t114e1a7cx9b218b2d26d05b9d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0905311301o4ef132d2xa3674fbdd218fe3c@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0905311315ne38f054s5b3545bb34ede49e@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0905311629u58e9b022r6a7c458f1a7f5492@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A238557.1010605@post.pl>
	<4f045a880906011904t114e1a7cx9b218b2d26d05b9d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:40:09 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906020140u6867b7e8j9de091868a9e35a9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 05:04, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > It is an excellent analysis, but don't
	under any circumstances publish > it as a wiki-essay, it would give the
	opposition half a clue! :) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] On wikistablishments
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7954278694221433947=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.8
X-Spam_score_int: 18
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 05:04, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > It is an excellent analysis, but don't
	under any circumstances publish > it as a wiki-essay, it would give the
	opposition half a clue! :) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4699]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7954278694221433947==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de17c88b9cf1046b597d53

--0016e6de17c88b9cf1046b597d53
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 05:04, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:

> It is an excellent analysis, but don't under any circumstances publish
> it as a wiki-essay, it would give the opposition half a clue! :)


And some of them would be inclined to claim that my understanding of this
simple concept means I'm creating a battlefield, or perhaps funded by
Berezovsky.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6de17c88b9cf1046b597d53
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 05:04, Martin <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:martint20@gmail.com">martint20@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">It is an excellent analysis, but don&#39;=
t under any circumstances publish<br></div></div>
it as a wiki-essay, it would give the opposition half a clue! :)</blockquot=
e><div><br></div><div>And some of them would be inclined to claim that my u=
nderstanding of this simple concept means I&#39;m creating a battlefield, o=
r perhaps funded by Berezovsky.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e6de17c88b9cf1046b597d53--


--===============7954278694221433947==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7954278694221433947==--


