X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jun 18 19:43:54 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906180741j7c9eea7fnf048b0cd89626ca1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c3b2b3db0906180741j7c9eea7fnf048b0cd89626ca1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:43:38 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906181043r23ec20f2r24917992b42b1259@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > I reported him to AE. Everyone is
	welcome to add more diffs. Why would Anonimu chime in in support of
	Offliner? I thought Offliner's account was registered a long time afte
	Anonimu's ban. Does this point towards Offliner being a sock puppet of
	some old friend of Anonimu? Or does it indicate that Anonimu is holding
	to his old grudges? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7008590857295912101=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > I reported him to AE. Everyone is
	welcome to add more diffs. Why would Anonimu chime in in support of
	Offliner? I thought Offliner's account was registered a long time afte
	Anonimu's ban. Does this point towards Offliner being a sock puppet of
	some old friend of Anonimu? Or does it indicate that Anonimu is holding
	to his old grudges? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7008590857295912101==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5ba3aaee080046ca2f245

--001636c5ba3aaee080046ca2f245
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:

> I reported him to AE. Everyone is welcome to add more diffs.


Why would Anonimu chime in in support of Offliner?  I thought Offliner's
account was registered a long time afte Anonimu's ban.  Does this point
towards Offliner being a sock puppet of some old friend of Anonimu?  Or does
it indicate that Anonimu is holding to his old grudges?

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5ba3aaee080046ca2f245
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei Dombay <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com">wikibiophys@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; paddi=
ng-left: 1ex;">
I reported him to AE. Everyone is welcome to add more diffs.</blockquote><d=
iv><br>Why would Anonimu chime in in support of Offliner?=C2=A0 I thought O=
ffliner&#39;s account was registered a long time afte Anonimu&#39;s ban.=C2=
=A0 Does this point towards Offliner being a sock puppet of some old friend=
 of Anonimu?=C2=A0 Or does it indicate that Anonimu is holding to his old g=
rudges?<br>
<br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5ba3aaee080046ca2f245--


--===============7008590857295912101==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7008590857295912101==--


