X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 24 09:06:49 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A41D0F6.9070601@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:08:38 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <be0.5d360a6b.3772dc2e@aol.com>	<4f045a880906232114w3ff23eecq4003babb5cfb380e@mail.gmail.com>	<4A41BFE1.1040300@post.pl>	<929ed1ec0906232322j75e49886l9c7e7f39b12c6b97@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906232356n35f5c1bdrde771cc61c3a4a5c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906232356n35f5c1bdrde771cc61c3a4a5c@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: radek szulga wrote: > Crap. I'm super busy today and
	will be gone all day and I can't pursue > it. Can someone at least
	initiate the disucssion with Shelly or > Thathcher? A little delay may
	be good here; I do think you should be the one to start it by emailing
	Shelly as I noted previously. If you do so in 24h or so, this shouldn't
	be an issue. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Hello, Martin
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > Crap. I'm super busy today and
	will be gone all day and I can't pursue > it. Can someone at least
	initiate the disucssion with Shelly or > Thathcher? A little delay may
	be good here; I do think you should be the one to start it by emailing
	Shelly as I noted previously. If you do so in 24h or so, this shouldn't
	be an issue. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

radek szulga wrote:
> Crap. I'm super busy today and will be gone all day and I can't pursue
> it. Can someone at least initiate the disucssion with Shelly or
> Thathcher?

A little delay may be good here; I do think you should be the one to 
start it by emailing Shelly as I noted previously. If you do so in 24h 
or so, this shouldn't be an issue.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

