X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun  5 20:42:29 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A296177.9080504@post.pl>
References: <4A2625B5.7010705@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906030113r295a1e3as1452b924a5f7a55f@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906031153u6f231517n51cd4e0f21aec4fb@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A296177.9080504@post.pl>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:42:15 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906051142l29a450f5m46b6f4d739884aff@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yeah I saw that - be sure to note "Be careful about
	citing this principle too aggressively. An exhortation to "Assume Good
	Faith" can itself be seen as a breach of this very tenet, since it fails
	to assume the assumption of good faith if the perceived assumption of
	bad faith is not clear-cut." from the guidelines. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Taking on Deacon
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yeah I saw that - be sure to note "Be careful about
	citing this principle too aggressively. An exhortation to "Assume Good
	Faith" can itself be seen as a breach of this very tenet, since it fails
	to assume the assumption of good faith if the perceived assumption of
	bad faith is not clear-cut." from the guidelines. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Yeah I saw that - be sure to note "Be careful about citing this
principle too aggressively. An exhortation to "Assume Good Faith" can
itself be seen as a breach of this very tenet, since it fails to
assume the assumption of good faith if the perceived assumption of bad
faith is not clear-cut." from the guidelines.

I'm holding off a little bit on Kurfurst - even though he's annoying
on Strategic Bombing I thought I'd give him more time since he seems
like one of those editors that sooner or later ends up putting their
foot in their mouth and then the case'd be stronger and more straight
forward.

2009/6/5 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> radek szulga wrote:
>> I think his comments over at Jacurek's 3RR can also go into his case fil=
e.
>
> So far, so good - more diffs, and a final proof that he is refusing
> mediation:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzi=
m&diff=3D294456430&oldid=3D294450386
>
> What to do next?
>
>
> --
> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here." =A0 =A0 |||
> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
> =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

