X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 23 06:16:03 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A405776.7080704@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:17:58 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <c01.62aa9782.37719d1d@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <c01.62aa9782.37719d1d@aol.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  PetersJV@aol.com wrote: > Well, the last time Thatcher
	jumped the gun was when I was about to > straighten out a situation and
	wound up on the "notified" list. Given > where this was headed, it came
	out as well as could be expected... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Thatcher jumps the gun, thankfully?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  PetersJV@aol.com wrote: > Well, the last time Thatcher
	jumped the gun was when I was about to > straighten out a situation and
	wound up on the "notified" list. Given > where this was headed, it came
	out as well as could be expected... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

PetersJV@aol.com wrote:
> Well, the last time Thatcher jumped the gun was when I was about to 
> straighten out a situation and wound up on the "notified" list. Given 
> where this was headed, it came out as well as could be expected...

Indeed. Seems only Dig, Offliner and PU were put on 1RR (Dig was also 
blocked for a few days). Not counting multiple notifications and 
warnings, I'd even say that at this point is seems like a minor victory 
for our side. Some may want to consider the vanishing trick. If a 
situation on some articles deteriorates, I suggest noting that here, and 
we will deal with it.

>     * Jehochman has been reprimanded and backed off

Where was he reprimanded? Can we get a diff?

> Piotr -- I noticed a late attack with piles of diffs on your talk page. 
> I started to respond but then decided you should take care of that 
> yourself. Editors rushing to your defense would prove the point.

I am not even going to bother. My experience tells me that such threads 
have little value other than annoying people they are targeting; i am 
not going to give them any satisfaction. Stuff like this 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jehochman&diff=prev&oldid=297955034
is only good for my own evidence that this guy is stalking/harassing me :)


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

