X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jan 27 13:26:55 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880901270312q1f261590r1e3d93c137dfd171@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0901270044x3c52baacuad3b41104f45aed1@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880901270047y5f656256p729d6352ba35b09f@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0901270213i7b291ce8ifc421f6650253dfa@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880901270312q1f261590r1e3d93c137dfd171@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:26:40 +0200
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0901270426i363aafecy5e2c5b5c9c864a99@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 13:12, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > Now that Russavia has raised this ANI
	report, it may be a good opportunity > for others to comment on his
	disruptive behaviour. > Consider pointing out the blatantly obvious
	real
	motive of Russavia: protecting an illicit vote he likes. Note that
	Russavia's own report draws parallels between me and the original vote, 
	so there's every reason to believe he understood I was removing my own
	vote, but decided to raise a frivolous objection none the less. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] A possibly developing funwar
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3670633876616969249=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.7
X-Spam_score_int: 17
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 13:12, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > Now that Russavia has raised this ANI
	report, it may be a good opportunity > for others to comment on his
	disruptive behaviour. > Consider pointing out the blatantly obvious real
	motive of Russavia: protecting an illicit vote he likes. Note that
	Russavia's own report draws parallels between me and the original vote,
	so there's every reason to believe he understood I was removing my own
	vote, but decided to raise a frivolous objection none the less. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4990]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3670633876616969249==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd97cca5792c046175f7d6

--0016e6dd97cca5792c046175f7d6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 13:12, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:

> Now that Russavia has raised this ANI report, it may be a good opportunity
> for others to comment on his disruptive behaviour.
>

Consider pointing out the blatantly obvious real motive of Russavia:
protecting an illicit vote he likes.  Note that Russavia's own report draws
parallels between me and the original vote, so there's every reason to
believe he understood I was removing my own vote, but decided to raise a
frivolous objection none the less.

Don't get too wordy.  Especially on AN/I, people tend to assume that the
side who talks more, or who gets overly defensive, is most likely the guilty
one.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6dd97cca5792c046175f7d6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 13:12, Martin <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:martint20@gmail.com">martint20@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>Now that Russavia has raised this ANI repor=
t, it may be a good opportunity for others to comment on his disruptive beh=
aviour.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Consider pointing out t=
he blatantly obvious real motive of Russavia: protecting an illicit vote he=
 likes. &nbsp;Note that Russavia&#39;s own report draws parallels between m=
e and the original vote, so there&#39;s every reason to believe he understo=
od I was removing my own vote, but decided to raise a frivolous objection n=
one the less.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Don&#39;t get too wordy. &nbsp;Especially on AN/I, peop=
le tend to assume that the side who talks more, or who gets overly defensiv=
e, is most likely the guilty one.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres S=
oolo<br>


--0016e6dd97cca5792c046175f7d6--


--===============3670633876616969249==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3670633876616969249==--


