X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 16 15:45:56 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906160623n34abb08ao711785cb4a8baaaa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <439330.19747.qm@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<f826636f0906160601o31b3615bv2248dff7148882ea@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906160621u7c95b6f6q717d243ddbaf03ce@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906160623n34abb08ao711785cb4a8baaaa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:45:40 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906160645p729a07d3vf08d1ad391ac0012@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 16:23, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > What's wrong here is this: all
	good-faith editing is assumed to be good. > No. Some good-faith editing
	is very harmful for the project. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Arbcom finding
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4965800295566423603=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 16:23, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > What's wrong here is this: all
	good-faith editing is assumed to be good. > No. Some good-faith editing
	is very harmful for the project. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4965800295566423603==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a66ff070ec046c7763ba

--001636c5a66ff070ec046c7763ba
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 16:23, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:

> What's wrong here is this: all good-faith editing is assumed to be good.
> No. Some good-faith editing is very harmful for the project.


What's wrong here is that arbcom has released an impressive-sounding ruling,
full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.  It doesn't mean anything; it
can not be used for anything except *ad hoc* support for all sorts of
strange ideas (some interpretation required), and it can probably not be
enforced in any consistent manner.

Biophys' point is good: good faith does not necessitate intentions
compatible with Wikipedia's stated purpose.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5a66ff070ec046c7763ba
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 16:23, Andrei Dombay <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com">wikibiophys@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; paddi=
ng-left: 1ex;">
What&#39;s wrong here is this: all good-faith editing is assumed to be good=
. No. Some good-faith editing is very harmful for the project.</blockquote>=
<div><br>What&#39;s wrong here is that arbcom has released an impressive-so=
unding ruling, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.=C2=A0 It doesn&#=
39;t mean anything; it can not be used for anything except <i>ad hoc</i> su=
pport for all sorts of strange ideas (some interpretation required), and it=
 can probably not be enforced in any consistent manner.<br>
<br>Biophys&#39; point is good: good faith does not necessitate intentions =
compatible with Wikipedia&#39;s stated purpose.<br></div></div><br>-- <br>A=
ndres Soolo<br>

--001636c5a66ff070ec046c7763ba--


--===============4965800295566423603==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4965800295566423603==--


