X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jun 11 10:16:46 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4fbe29dd0906110047w65c5f8b4k1aa966be08e80d20@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4fbe29dd0906080532g1a082d0ej7c91f03b8628a86e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0906090510x15e917c9rcc5216a5aef6ca4d@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880906091753l376ddd53i5c141ff84a382859@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906091827q6e7631e6r5e1d74ae4b74f3f7@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0906092235s59eeaf38sf29f723eb76e4649@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906092316uf280f01j3521746fd35167e0@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0906092352t21bf87aay1e0163114e3d9176@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0906100333l4a56bb05w98767a19c37e0b8b@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906102120r4e633391jd3f972318a9d2a0a@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0906110047w65c5f8b4k1aa966be08e80d20@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:16:29 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906110116r6af8ecf7qe36b4173ce96132c@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Yeah it seems to work now. How does the normalization
	work? Also, PasswordUsername has a very similar editing pattern to me -
	correlation coefficient of about .78. This supports the Wichita, Kansas
	theory since that's like straight south of where I'm at. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Diurnal cycle tool
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yeah it seems to work now. How does the normalization
	work? Also, PasswordUsername has a very similar editing pattern to me -
	correlation coefficient of about .78. This supports the Wichita, Kansas
	theory since that's like straight south of where I'm at. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Yeah it seems to work now. How does the normalization work?

Also, PasswordUsername has a very similar editing pattern to me -
correlation coefficient of about .78. This supports the Wichita,
Kansas theory since that's like straight south of where I'm at.

This may seem like a silly question but is there a way to find out a
user's IP? Basically, to find out which time zone they're in?

Radek

2009/6/11 Sander S=E4de <sander.sade@gmail.com>:
> Should be OK now, I forgot that handling zero values was done during the
> normalization.
>
> Sander
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:20 AM, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, I'm having problems doing it for some users. For example
>> FeelSunny doesn't work. It returns the "Something went wrong:
>> The given key was not present in the dictionary."
>> error message.
>>
>> Radek
>>
>>
>> 2009/6/10 Sander S=E4de <sander.sade@gmail.com>:
>> > It is now possible to get the raw hourly counts by adding &format=3Dcs=
v to
>> > the
>> > address of Analyze -
>> >
>> > http://dukelupus.com/wikitools/diurnal/Home/Analyze?firstUser=3DMartin=
tg&secondUser=3DDigwuren&format=3Dcsv
>> > - this will return the raw contribution counts in a tab-delimited CSV
>> > format, ie:
>> >
>> > UTC =A0 Martintg =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Digwuren
>> > 0 =A0 =A0 179 =A0 =A0 15
>> > 1 =A0 =A0 229 =A0 =A0 2
>> > 2 =A0 =A0 223 =A0 =A0 2
>> > 3 =A0 =A0 200 =A0 =A0 19
>> > 4 =A0 =A0 206 =A0 =A0 39
>> > 5 =A0 =A0 153 =A0 =A0 55
>> > 6 =A0 =A0 85 =A0 =A0 =A0101
>> > 7 =A0 =A0 48 =A0 =A0 =A0208
>> > 8 =A0 =A0 44 =A0 =A0 =A0226
>> > 9 =A0 =A0 81 =A0 =A0 =A0199
>> > 10 =A0 =A0130 =A0 =A0 178
>> > 11 =A0 =A0203 =A0 =A0 220
>> > 12 =A0 =A081 =A0 =A0 =A0198
>> > 13 =A0 =A031 =A0 =A0 =A0147
>> > 14 =A0 =A016 =A0 =A0 =A0153
>> > 15 =A0 =A04 =A0 =A0 =A0 191
>> >
>> > 16 =A0 =A09 =A0 =A0 =A0 225
>> > 17 =A0 =A019 =A0 =A0 =A0131
>> > 18 =A0 =A032 =A0 =A0 =A0172
>> > 19 =A0 =A0139 =A0 =A0 168
>> > 20 =A0 =A0228 =A0 =A0 145
>> > 21 =A0 =A0205 =A0 =A0 121
>> > 22 =A0 =A0197 =A0 =A0 60
>> > 23 =A0 =A0258 =A0 =A0 25
>> >
>> > Note that it is possible to use just one user,
>> >
>> > http://dukelupus.com/wikitools/diurnal/Home/Analyze?firstUser=3DPasswo=
rdUsername&format=3Dcsv
>> >
>> > Sander
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Sander S=E4de <sander.sade@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The API is available from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php, but I can
>> >> make the tool easily to give actual values in a csv format, too. I'll
>> >> do
>> >> that in a couple of hours, if I have the time.
>> >>
>> >> Sander
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:16 AM, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I probably just don't know enough about the ins and outs of Wiki her=
e,
>> >>> but where exactly? I can use http://dukelupus.com/wikitools/diurnal/
>> >>> but I want to crunch some actual numbers here (btw, if you put me and
>> >>> Russavia in there it's like a negative correlation of almost -1 -
>> >>> which could mean that I'm his sock or that we're in completely
>> >>> different time zones) - like a spreadsheet or a ascii file that the
>> >>> graphs are constructed from.
>> >>>
>> >>> Radek
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> > folks@wikipedometer.net
>> > http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

