X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 16 01:14:57 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <760616.75782.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <760616.75782.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:14:45 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880906151614g3b638a6ag8567f142e049b263@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yes,
	there is definitely a need for [[Category:Communist
	successor parties]]. Good catch. On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:57 AM,
	Christian Suciu<christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote: > It's probably no
	coincidence that because of its pre-war parliamentary > experience,
	which helped legitimise it as an authentic workers' movement > rather
	than purely a fanatical sect and then a mechanism of Soviet >
	occupation, that it is in the Czech Republic (and, to a lesser extent, >
	Slovakia) that one finds the only non-fringe Communist party in Eastern
	> Europe today (outside the former USSR). To one degree or another,
	other > Communist successor parties (The Left in Germany, the PSD, SLD, 
	MSZP, PSSH, > BSP in Romania, Poland, Hungary, Albania and Bulgaria
	respectively) have > tried to distance themselves from the "Communist"
	label. Serbia's Socialist > Party may be an exception. I'm a little
	surprised there's no > [[Category:Communist successor parties]],
	especially when sources are > readily available to document them as
	such. > (http://books.google.com/books?id=55Fi2axLbnkC&pg=PA271) > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] PS
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yes, there is definitely a need for [[Category:Communist
	successor parties]]. Good catch. On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:57 AM,
	Christian Suciu<christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote: > It's probably no
	coincidence that because of its pre-war parliamentary > experience,
	which helped legitimise it as an authentic workers' movement > rather
	than purely a fanatical sect and then a mechanism of Soviet >
	occupation, that it is in the Czech Republic (and, to a lesser extent, >
	Slovakia) that one finds the only non-fringe Communist party in Eastern
	> Europe today (outside the former USSR). To one degree or another,
	other > Communist successor parties (The Left in Germany, the PSD, SLD,
	MSZP, PSSH, > BSP in Romania, Poland, Hungary, Albania and Bulgaria
	respectively) have > tried to distance themselves from the "Communist"
	label. Serbia's Socialist > Party may be an exception. I'm a little
	surprised there's no > [[Category:Communist successor parties]],
	especially when sources are > readily available to document them as
	such. > (http://books.google.com/books?id=55Fi2axLbnkC&pg=PA271) > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Yes, there is definitely a need for [[Category:Communist successor
parties]]. Good catch.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Christian
Suciu<christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> It's probably no coincidence that because of its pre-war parliamentary
> experience, which helped legitimise it as an authentic workers' movement
> rather than purely a fanatical sect and then a mechanism of Soviet
> occupation, that it is in the Czech Republic (and, to a lesser extent,
> Slovakia) that one finds the only non-fringe Communist party in Eastern
> Europe today (outside the former USSR). To one degree or another, other
> Communist successor parties (The Left in Germany, the PSD, SLD, MSZP, PSSH,
> BSP in Romania, Poland, Hungary, Albania and Bulgaria respectively) have
> tried to distance themselves from the "Communist" label. Serbia's Socialist
> Party may be an exception. I'm a little surprised there's no
> [[Category:Communist successor parties]], especially when sources are
> readily available to document them as such.
> (http://books.google.com/books?id=55Fi2axLbnkC&pg=PA271)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

