X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  2 22:29:19 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A257698.4030404@post.pl>
References: <4A238480.5040704@post.pl> <4A2446A2.6050103@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906011447k468639bbh9c98539fd7421db9@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A24C39C.4040800@post.pl> <4A257698.4030404@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:29:06 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906021329l7c76574cy93e61eded0743e5@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Well, Sandstein closed the case with a 6 month topic
	ban. I'm wondering if this was done so quickly to limit the damage (I
	was hoping it would linger there long enough for Matthead to get a
	chance to express his feelings) - since if other admins got involved in
	addition to the topic ban he could've gotten a block. This way it
	doesn't go into his block log. We'll see if he can stand it. I'm also
	wondering if I shouldn't bring up what he left on my talk page to ANI
	just for incivility but don't want to look like I'm vindictive about
	this. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Smith2006
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Well, Sandstein closed the case with a 6 month topic
	ban. I'm wondering if this was done so quickly to limit the damage (I
	was hoping it would linger there long enough for Matthead to get a
	chance to express his feelings) - since if other admins got involved in
	addition to the topic ban he could've gotten a block. This way it
	doesn't go into his block log. We'll see if he can stand it. I'm also
	wondering if I shouldn't bring up what he left on my talk page to ANI
	just for incivility but don't want to look like I'm vindictive about
	this. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Well, Sandstein closed the case with a 6 month topic ban. I'm
wondering if this was done so quickly to limit the damage (I was
hoping it would linger there long enough for Matthead to get a chance
to express his feelings) - since if other admins got involved in
addition to the topic ban he could've gotten a block. This way it
doesn't go into his block log. We'll see if he can stand it.
I'm also wondering if I shouldn't bring up what he left on my talk
page to ANI just for incivility but don't want to look like I'm
vindictive about this.

2009/6/2 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> Piotr Konieczny wrote:
>> radek szulga wrote:
>>
>>> On other news - Smith2006 persists in making uncivil remarks, despite
>>> being warned and notified of the sanction:
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Jan_Dzier%C5%BCon&diff=
=3Dprev&oldid=3D293801995
>>> "nationalist annexationist POV"
>>> "I think we must falsify the wikipedia article on Miroslav Klose"
>>> "a forced Polonized name from Communist-era Poland"
>>> "Just to serve the Polish view and some Polish publications from a
>>> politicized and censoring era"
>>> so I think at this point a block can be arranged. Hopefully this will
>>> also provide enough rope for Matthead to hang himself with, as he
>>> seems itching to do so, and we'll get a two for one special.
>>
>> Try reporting him to the talk pages of admins who commented at AE. This
>> may generate less dramu than another AE report (unless we want to gamble
>> on Matthead losing it there). Although, if they decline action on their
>> talk, they'll have to take it on AE.
>>
>
>
> Yeah, with this
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Radeksz&diff=3Dpre=
v&oldid=3D293991369)
> he is looking at a ban. I am too tired to report him myself, but this
> and some other recent diffs is enough rope to hang him easily :)
>
>
> --
> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here." =A0 =A0 |||
> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
> =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

