X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 22:36:28 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211212p10320e3cwbfc9bb3780e2a5c3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c39.57b57f3e.376ee266@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906202028s9291ce7webaed4493229aedb@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70906210719u3ac8b9b3l9f28443cce3dabe2@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3E7FEE.8070601@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211212p10320e3cwbfc9bb3780e2a5c3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:36:20 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211336h47a4185eg660716b7591628f3@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Given the latest moving around of Piotrus' edits
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=297786750&oldid=297786362
	and Jehochman's statement that "Digwuren is one of the most warned and
	sanctioned editors on Wikipedia. They do not need any more chances to
	reform. " (which is obviously false - and it betrays his prejudices
	here) I think it's probably time to start questioning his
	"uninvolvedness" as well. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Well, there goes another weekend, the latest AE
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Given the latest moving around of Piotrus' edits
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=297786750&oldid=297786362
	and Jehochman's statement that "Digwuren is one of the most warned and
	sanctioned editors on Wikipedia. They do not need any more chances to
	reform. " (which is obviously false - and it betrays his prejudices
	here) I think it's probably time to start questioning his
	"uninvolvedness" as well. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Given the latest moving around of Piotrus' edits
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=297786750&oldid=297786362
 and Jehochman's statement that "Digwuren is one of the most warned
and sanctioned editors on Wikipedia. They do not need any more chances
to reform. " (which is obviously false - and it betrays his prejudices
here) I think it's probably time to start questioning his
"uninvolvedness" as well.

It'd be useful to back track it to where it originated from which I
think someone already mentioned.

Radek


2009/6/21 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 21:46, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>>
>> If Deacon chimes in with his "Piotrus is allied to Baltics due to
>> Irpen-hate", one can simply point out that he is assuming bad faith here
>> and that he is certainly involved and biased when it comes to anything
>> Piotrus-related :)
>
> And that there is no Irpen.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

