X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jul 20 00:12:25 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0907190944p47473b09td74bb9aec4665212@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A6346F2.8090104@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0907190944p47473b09td74bb9aec4665212@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:12:14 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0907191512l265dd2d4l9a68d7c7ccdad94a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: My thoughts? There is nothing special here. Wikipedia
	is censored every day by an army of anonymous editors, some of whom are
	paid by off wiki orgabizations. This case is only notable because it
	received a lot of publicity. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] [WMP] Wikipedia supports media blackout
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7486159567481949420=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  My thoughts? There is nothing special here. Wikipedia
	is censored every day by an army of anonymous editors, some of whom are
	paid by off wiki orgabizations. This case is only notable because it
	received a lot of publicity. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7486159567481949420==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cfaf5a96f3046f1650ea

--00504502cfaf5a96f3046f1650ea
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

  My thoughts? There is nothing special here. Wikipedia is censored every
day by an army of anonymous editors, some of whom are paid by off wiki
orgabizations. This case is only notable because it received a lot of
publicity.





On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 19:16, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-06-29/In_the_news#Rohde.27s_kidnapping.E2.80.94and_edit_wars
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-07-06/In_the_news
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-07-13/In_the_news
>>
>> It was well meaning, and potentially saved one guys life, but
>> nonetheless Wikipedia was censorsed, with blessings from Wales...
>>
>> Your thoughts?
>
>
> Common example of Jimbo's management style.  He heard of a possibility to
> "be involved" in it, it "seemed like a good idea at the time", so he threw
> his support behind it.  It is not the first controversial move he's pushed
> onto Wikipedia, and it will certainly not be the last one.
>
> On the other hand, any rescue plan that depends on this sort of censorship
> is iffy at best in the 21st century.  If I were in charge of the appropriate
> department of a three-letter organisation and I needed some Fog of War, I'd
> give more serious thought to the good old approach of Conficting Rumours &
> Conspiracy Theories.  But perhaps NYT is not a three-letter agency.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--00504502cfaf5a96f3046f1650ea
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=A0
My thoughts? There is nothing special here. Wikipedia is censored every day=
 by an army of anonymous editors, some of whom are paid by off wiki orgabiz=
ations. This case is only notable because it received a lot of publicity.<b=
r>
<br><br><br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 12:4=
4 PM, Digwuren <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">=
digwuren@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt =
0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 19:16,=
 Piotr Konieczny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, =
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-0=
6-29/In_the_news#Rohde.27s_kidnapping.E2.80.94and_edit_wars" target=3D"_bla=
nk">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-06-29/In=
_the_news#Rohde.27s_kidnapping.E2.80.94and_edit_wars</a><br>


<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-0=
7-06/In_the_news" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:=
Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-07-06/In_the_news</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-0=
7-13/In_the_news" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:=
Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-07-13/In_the_news</a><br>
<br>
It was well meaning, and potentially saved one guys life, but<br>
nonetheless Wikipedia was censorsed, with blessings from Wales...<br>
<br>
Your thoughts?</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Common example of Jimb=
o&#39;s management style. =A0He heard of a possibility to &quot;be involved=
&quot; in it, it &quot;seemed like a good idea at the time&quot;, so he thr=
ew his support behind it. =A0It is not the first controversial move he&#39;=
s pushed onto Wikipedia, and it will certainly not be the last one.</div>

<div><br></div><div>On the other hand, any rescue plan that depends on this=
 sort of censorship is iffy at best in the 21st century. =A0If I were in ch=
arge of the appropriate department of a three-letter organisation and I nee=
ded some Fog of War, I&#39;d give more serious thought to the good old appr=
oach of Conficting Rumours &amp; Conspiracy Theories. =A0But perhaps NYT is=
 not a three-letter agency.</div>

<div><br></div><div>--=A0</div></div>Andres Soolo<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--00504502cfaf5a96f3046f1650ea--


--===============7486159567481949420==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7486159567481949420==--


