X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 23 18:26:08 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906221336t25cc4ef9lb5fd9fb96222c73c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c79.5b3fb090.376fba1f@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906221336t25cc4ef9lb5fd9fb96222c73c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:26:01 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0906230926o4e0d50a4qb92633dfd0d5632a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Well,
	I had similiar thoughts. One can get too absorbed
	in Wiki, it's usefull to take some break, write an article in peace,
	then post it and call for assistance it is attacked. I do think, that
	you are too good of a contributor to loose. We all though need balance
	in Wiki editing. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] TO biophys
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8520310703857472205=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Well, I had similiar thoughts. One can get too absorbed
	in Wiki, it's usefull to take some break, write an article in peace,
	then post it and call for assistance it is attacked. I do think, that
	you are too good of a contributor to loose. We all though need balance
	in Wiki editing. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8520310703857472205==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e8ffce49c37c046d06726f

--001636e8ffce49c37c046d06726f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Well, I had similiar thoughts. One can get too absorbed in Wiki, it's
usefull to take some break, write an article in peace, then post it and call
for assistance it is attacked. I do think, that you are too good of a
contributor to loose. We all though need balance in Wiki editing.

2009/6/22 Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>

>
> I did not read this message before. This is very sad. I have no problem
> opening a new account to edit exclusively on natural science subjects.
> However, if I edit anything from Russian history/politics, Alex and Mikkalai
> will identify me quickly, even if I create only content and change the
> subject.
>
> But I have a more serious problem. Speaking logically, I should not be
> editing here at all, as this seriously damages my work in real life and even
> personal relations (the only reasons are an addiction and desire to share
> knowledge).  But the only thing that can work is apparently  "cold turkey".
>
> Either way,  I have to leave this place, and the sooner the better.
>
> Good bye, WP!
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:30 PM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>  In a message dated 6/21/2009 11:18:40 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> wikibiophys@gmail.com writes:
>>
>> Perhaps we both make the same mistakes. First, we spend time in WP instead
>> of doing our real work (but such is addiction). Second, we both talk too
>> much in WP instead of creating content.
>>
>>  I always believe a well constructed argument can win people over. I've
>> learned, however, that once a prejudice has formed (either positive or
>> negative), there are very few who are open to any change in their personal
>> belief system. The best we can hope to do is to create content that
>> persuades the "uninitiated" to the facts of the matter.
>>
>> As for those who want to "just ban everyone" we have to prove we're not in
>> that target zone.
>>
>> /Peters
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221323000x1201367220/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=JunestepsfooterNO62>
>> *
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--001636e8ffce49c37c046d06726f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well, I had similiar thoughts. One can get too absorbed in Wiki, it&#39;s u=
sefull to take some break, write an article in peace, then post it and call=
 for assistance it is attacked. I do think, that you are too good of a cont=
ributor to loose. We all though need balance in Wiki editing.<br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/6/22 Andrei Dombay <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com">wikibiophys@gmail.com</a>&gt;</s=
pan><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid r=
gb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>I did not read this message before. This is very sad. I have no problem=
 opening a new account to edit exclusively on natural science subjects.=A0 =
However, if I edit anything from Russian history/politics, Alex and Mikkala=
i will identify me quickly, even if I create only content and change the su=
bject. <br>

<br>But I have a more serious problem. Speaking logically, I should not be =
editing here at all, as this seriously damages my work in real life and eve=
n personal relations (the only reasons are an addiction and desire to share=
 knowledge).=A0 But the only thing that can work is apparently=A0 &quot;col=
d turkey&quot;. <br>

<br>Either way,=A0 I have to leave this place, and the sooner the better.=
=A0 <br><br>Good bye, WP! <br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div><div>=
</div><div class=3D"h5">On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:30 PM,  <span dir=3D"ltr=
">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:PetersJV@aol.com" target=3D"_blank">PetersJV@aol.co=
m</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

</div></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px sol=
id rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div>=
<div></div><div class=3D"h5">



<div style=3D"font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;"><f=
ont color=3D"#000000" size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><div>
<div>
<div>In a message dated 6/21/2009 11:18:40 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,=20
<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">wikibiophys@gmai=
l.com</a> writes:</div>
<blockquote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid blue; padding-left: 5px; margin=
-left: 5px;"><font style=3D"background-color: transparent;" color=3D"#00000=
0" size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">Perhaps=20
  we both make the same mistakes. First, we spend time in WP instead of doi=
ng=20
  our real work (but such is addiction). Second, we both talk too much in W=
P=20
  instead of creating content. <br></font></blockquote></div>
<div></div>
</div><div>I always believe a well constructed argument can win people over=
. I&#39;ve=20
learned, however, that once a prejudice has formed (either positive or=20
negative), there are very few who are open to any change in their personal=
=20
belief system. The best we can hope to do is to create content that persuad=
es=20
the &quot;uninitiated&quot; to the facts of the matter.</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>As for those who want to &quot;just ban everyone&quot; we have to prov=
e we&#39;re not in=20
that target zone. </div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>/Peters</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>=A0</div></font><div><div><br><font style=3D"color: black; font-family=
: arial,san-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: n=
ormal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-s=
tretch: normal;"> <hr style=3D"margin-top: 10px;">

<b>A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. <a href=3D"http://pr.atwola.com/pro=
moclk/100126575x1221323000x1201367220/aol?redir=3Dhttp://www.freecreditrepo=
rt.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=3D668072%26hmpgID=3D62%26bcd=3DJunestepsfooterNO6=
2" target=3D"_blank">See yours in just 2 easy steps!</a></b></font></div>

</div></div>
<br></div></div><div class=3D"im">_________________________________________=
______<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net" target=3D"_blank">folks@wikipedo=
meter.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--001636e8ffce49c37c046d06726f--


--===============8520310703857472205==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8520310703857472205==--


