X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 19 19:29:21 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906190715w6e35fd30j508a40422aedcbef@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181257q5ee1749ap4872a277af9b7a6f@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906181304x6fab2980se600cc88f41aaaf8@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181350i5fbd4cc9u41114510a11eab2@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181358tec27236w5a3ad45a11e02432@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190014k624acd6as6a0793df5398e54d@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190412i80309d6kf23d7967fc7b8764@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906190619j14cfa570u7a77a29a69336ac4@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190715w6e35fd30j508a40422aedcbef@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:29:06 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0906191029t9a8ab49jc2c0922a0b24c1cd@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I am afraid this will be seen as an intentional
	disruption, an action intended to "generate a lot of dramu", exactly as
	you tell. And it may be punished as [[WP:POINT]]. People are really
	getting tired of our dramas. Let's be quite. My filing was obviously a
	bad mistake. We should not make things worse ourselves. Our opponents
	will do it. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1423500187294407006=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I am afraid this will be seen as an intentional
	disruption, an action intended to "generate a lot of dramu", exactly as
	you tell. And it may be punished as [[WP:POINT]]. People are really
	getting tired of our dramas. Let's be quite. My filing was obviously a
	bad mistake. We should not make things worse ourselves. Our opponents
	will do it. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1423500187294407006==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d25cb8cbb27046cb6dcc7

--0016364d25cb8cbb27046cb6dcc7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I am afraid this will be seen as an intentional disruption, an action
intended to "generate a lot of dramu", exactly as you tell. And it may be
punished as [[WP:POINT]]. People are really getting tired of our dramas.
Let's be quite.  My filing was obviously a bad mistake. We should not make
things worse ourselves. Our opponents will do it.



On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 16:19, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Not responding means admitting all arguments by your opponents. Not
>> responding was fatal error of Vlad Fedorov. You should follow last advice by
>> Sandstein: (1) responds to all claims or diffs that may be misunderstood by
>> the reviewing administrator; (2) if you think the accusers have some valid
>> points, tell how you are going to adapt/behave. I think your text above is
>> OK as a part of your answer.
>
>
> I'll try.  But I also had another silly idea.
>
> How about I'll call for a ban vote on AN/I on myself?  I'd call it a vote
> of confidence, and attach today's date to it, in an implicit-yet-obvious bid
> that all my possible editing issues up to today are covered by the resulting
> vote.  It'll generate a lot of dramu, and hopefully direct it in the right
> direction.
>
> There's naturally a risk that the Web Brigades manage to show up in large
> numbers.  It'd be interesting to see, if that happens.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0016364d25cb8cbb27046cb6dcc7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am afraid this will be seen as an intentional disruption, an action inten=
ded to &quot;generate a lot of dramu&quot;, exactly as you tell. And it may=
 be punished as [[WP:POINT]]. People are really getting tired of our dramas=
. Let&#39;s be quite.=A0 My filing was obviously a bad mistake. We should n=
ot make things worse ourselves. Our opponents will do it.<br>
<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Di=
gwuren <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren=
@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; p=
adding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 16:19,=
 Andrei Dombay <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.co=
m" target=3D"_blank">wikibiophys@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 20=
4); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

Not responding means admitting all arguments by your opponents. Not respond=
ing was fatal error of Vlad Fedorov. You should follow last advice by Sands=
tein: (1) responds to all claims or diffs that may be misunderstood by the =
reviewing administrator; (2) if you think the accusers have some valid poin=
ts, tell how you are going to adapt/behave. I think your text above is OK a=
s a part of your answer.</blockquote>

<div><br></div></div><div>I&#39;ll try. =A0But I also had another silly ide=
a.</div><div><br></div><div>How about I&#39;ll call for a ban vote on AN/I =
on myself? =A0I&#39;d call it a vote of confidence, and attach today&#39;s =
date to it, in an implicit-yet-obvious bid that all my possible editing iss=
ues up to today are covered by the resulting vote. =A0It&#39;ll generate a =
lot of dramu, and hopefully direct it in the right direction.</div>

<div><br></div><div>There&#39;s naturally a risk that the Web Brigades mana=
ge to show up in large numbers. =A0It&#39;d be interesting to see, if that =
happens.</div><div><br></div></div><font color=3D"#888888">-- <br>Andres So=
olo<br>

</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0016364d25cb8cbb27046cb6dcc7--


--===============1423500187294407006==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1423500187294407006==--


