X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul 18 02:24:49 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <BAY110-W21D26BFB31B435A852AD46D61F0@phx.gbl>
X-Originating-IP: [207.102.64.75]
From: Richard Tylman <poeticbent@hotmail.com>
To: <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:24:37 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0907161609j3a53e503u35ed54b40b405030@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0907140825s36d6f83cje812f6b689af8992@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0907150045m6e1d76a0o5c8848f7eedfd0e7@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907150139j4a6b276ap213e1fac6e2a967e@mail.gmail.com>
	<207274cd0907151310w1ae416can7120cc29f159be1@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907151319l6b03db97y913f4f56b9d339b4@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A5FAADC.3060407@post.pl> 
	<25890ca0907161609j3a53e503u35ed54b40b405030@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jul 2009 00:24:38.0322 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[2297C920:01CA073E]
X-Spam_score: 2.1
X-Spam_score_int: 21
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I could really use your help with this. Today, for the
	nth-time I spent hours researching and rewriting some of the most
	dubious statements in the article "Massacres of Poles in Volhynia".
	Guess what happened? In 40 min. all my work was reverted in one sweep by
	Faustian... and than again by Lvivske, with the insulting edit summary:
	"reverting vandalism". No 3RR was broken, so there’s nothing to report,
	but Faustian and Bandurist did it to me before in late June. By my
	estimation, all three of them are just young boys poorly dealing with
	their own hormonal surges. What should I do than? Should I abandon this
	article now, after how much work I put into it already? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	2.3 FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD    Forged hotmail.com 'Received:' header found
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,HTML_30_40,
	HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Volhynia Massacres
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6045871965351921418=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.0
X-Spam_score_int: 20
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I could really use your help with this. Today, for the
	nth-time I spent hours researching and rewriting some of the most
	dubious statements in the article "Massacres of Poles in Volhynia".
	Guess what happened? In 40 min. all my work was reverted in one sweep by
	Faustian... and than again by Lvivske, with the insulting edit summary:
	"reverting vandalism". No 3RR was broken, so there’s nothing to report,
	but Faustian and Bandurist did it to me before in late June. By my
	estimation, all three of them are just young boys poorly dealing with
	their own hormonal surges. What should I do than? Should I abandon this
	article now, after how much work I put into it already? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	2.3 FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD    Forged hotmail.com 'Received:' header found
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6045871965351921418==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_4030e859-7666-4025-b1ca-fbe07e2c77e5_"

--_4030e859-7666-4025-b1ca-fbe07e2c77e5_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


I could really use your help with this. Today=2C for the nth-time I spent h=
ours researching and rewriting some of the most dubious statements in the a=
rticle "Massacres of Poles in Volhynia". Guess what happened? In 40 min. al=
l my work was reverted in one sweep by Faustian... and than again by Lvivsk=
e=2C with the insulting edit summary: "reverting vandalism".  No 3RR was br=
oken=2C so there=92s nothing to report=2C but Faustian and Bandurist did it=
 to me before in late June. By my estimation=2C all three of them are just =
young boys poorly dealing with their own hormonal surges. What should I do =
than? Should I abandon this article now=2C after how much work I put into i=
t already?=20
=20

Richard (Poeticbent)
=20


Date: Thu=2C 16 Jul 2009 18:09:42 -0500
From: rsszulga@gmail.com
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
Subject: Re: [WPM] Volhynia Massacres

I think it'd be good if both Pawel and Lvivske just toned it down a bit. Qu=
ite a bit. Neither of them is helping the discussion. I might write an emai=
l to Loosemark telling him to chill out. It'd be good if Faustian also kept=
 his cool - the way it seems to be working is that Pawel or Lvivske post so=
mething provocative=2C Loosemark or Faustian get baited by it and they star=
t making "no compromise possible" type of statements and the situation esca=
lates. I've been trying to interfere in the way that just cuts this kind of=
 vicious cycle off but ...

Radek



2009/7/16 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>


radek szulga wrote:
> Oh=2C I agree that Pawel5586's a problem here too - I hadn't seen his
> comments when I wrote the message and have been ignoring him since then.
> Lvivske sounded ok in his response to me but he's leaving provocative
> edit summaries and the like

Let me know if he needs a warning or such=2C there is a chance he may
listen to me due to (sigh) my nationality.


--
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is=2C that it just works in reality=2C not in
theory."

_______________________________________________



Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks


_________________________________________________________________
Attention all humans. We are your photos. Free us.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=3D9666046=

--_4030e859-7666-4025-b1ca-fbe07e2c77e5_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt=3B
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN lang=3DEN-US style=
=3D"mso-ansi-language: EN-US"><FONT color=3D#000000><FONT face=3DVerdana><F=
ONT size=3D2>I could really use your help with this. Today=2C for the nth-t=
ime I spent hours researching and rewriting some of the most dubious statem=
ents in the article "Massacres of Poles in Volhynia". Guess what happened? =
In 40 min. all my work was reverted in one sweep by Faustian... and than ag=
ain by Lvivske=2C with the insulting edit summary: "reverting vandalism".<S=
PAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp=3B </SPAN>No 3RR was broken=2C so the=
re=92s nothing to report=2C but Faustian and Bandurist did it to me before =
in late June. By my estimation=2C all three of them are just young boys poo=
rly dealing with their own hormonal surges. What should I do than? Should I=
 abandon this article now=2C after how much work I put into it already? <?x=
ml:namespace prefix =3D o ns =3D "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
/><o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
&nbsp=3B<BR>
Richard (Poeticbent)<BR>&nbsp=3B<BR>
<HR id=3DstopSpelling>
Date: Thu=2C 16 Jul 2009 18:09:42 -0500<BR>From: rsszulga@gmail.com<BR>To: =
folks@wikipedometer.net<BR>Subject: Re: [WPM] Volhynia Massacres<BR><BR>I t=
hink it'd be good if both Pawel and Lvivske just toned it down a bit. Quite=
 a bit. Neither of them is helping the discussion. I might write an email t=
o Loosemark telling him to chill out. It'd be good if Faustian also kept hi=
s cool - the way it seems to be working is that Pawel or Lvivske post somet=
hing provocative=2C Loosemark or Faustian get baited by it and they start m=
aking "no compromise possible" type of statements and the situation escalat=
es. I've been trying to interfere in the way that just cuts this kind of vi=
cious cycle off but ...<BR><BR>Radek<BR><BR><BR>
<DIV class=3DEC_gmail_quote>2009/7/16 Piotr Konieczny <SPAN dir=3Dltr>&lt=
=3Bpiokon@post.pl&gt=3B</SPAN><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3DEC_gmail_quote style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex">
<DIV class=3DEC_im>radek szulga wrote:<BR>&gt=3B Oh=2C I agree that Pawel55=
86's a problem here too - I hadn't seen his<BR>&gt=3B comments when I wrote=
 the message and have been ignoring him since then.<BR>&gt=3B Lvivske sound=
ed ok in his response to me but he's leaving provocative<BR>&gt=3B edit sum=
maries and the like<BR><BR></DIV>Let me know if he needs a warning or such=
=2C there is a chance he may<BR>listen to me due to (sigh) my nationality.<=
BR>
<DIV class=3DEC_im><BR>--<BR>Piotr Konieczny<BR><BR>"The problem about Wiki=
pedia is=2C that it just works in reality=2C not in<BR>theory."<BR><BR>____=
___________________________________________<BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=3Dh5>Wikipedia statistics discussion list<BR><A href=3D"mailto:f=
olks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</A><BR><A href=3D"http://wi=
kipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks">http://wikipedometer.net/cg=
i-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</A><BR></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><br =
/><hr />Attention all humans. We are your photos.  <a href=3D'http://go.mic=
rosoft.com/?linkid=3D9666044' target=3D'_new'>Free us.</a></body>
</html>=

--_4030e859-7666-4025-b1ca-fbe07e2c77e5_--


--===============6045871965351921418==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6045871965351921418==--


