X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 23 08:54:54 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A405776.7080704@post.pl>
References: <c01.62aa9782.37719d1d@aol.com> <4A405776.7080704@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:54:35 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880906222354m350b3406s7289026807167a66@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > PetersJV@aol.com wrote: > > Well, the last
	time Thatcher jumped the gun was when I was about to > > straighten out
	a situation and wound up on the "notified" list. Given > > where this
	was headed, it came out as well as could be expected... > > Indeed.
	Seems only Dig, Offliner and PU were put on 1RR (Dig was also > blocked
	for a few days). Not counting multiple notifications and > warnings, I'd
	even say that at this point is seems like a minor victory > for our
	side. Some may want to consider the vanishing trick. If a > situation
	on
	some articles deteriorates, I suggest noting that here, and > we will
	deal with it. > > > * Jehochman has been reprimanded and backed off > >
	Where was he reprimanded? Can we get a diff? > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Thatcher jumps the gun, thankfully?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0855911728671109868=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > PetersJV@aol.com wrote: > > Well, the last
	time Thatcher jumped the gun was when I was about to > > straighten out
	a situation and wound up on the "notified" list. Given > > where this
	was headed, it came out as well as could be expected... > > Indeed.
	Seems only Dig, Offliner and PU were put on 1RR (Dig was also > blocked
	for a few days). Not counting multiple notifications and > warnings, I'd
	even say that at this point is seems like a minor victory > for our
	side. Some may want to consider the vanishing trick. If a > situation on
	some articles deteriorates, I suggest noting that here, and > we will
	deal with it. > > > * Jehochman has been reprimanded and backed off > >
	Where was he reprimanded? Can we get a diff? > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0855911728671109868==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174bdc10b06518046cfe76d0

--0015174bdc10b06518046cfe76d0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> PetersJV@aol.com wrote:
> > Well, the last time Thatcher jumped the gun was when I was about to
> > straighten out a situation and wound up on the "notified" list. Given
> > where this was headed, it came out as well as could be expected...
>
> Indeed. Seems only Dig, Offliner and PU were put on 1RR (Dig was also
> blocked for a few days). Not counting multiple notifications and
> warnings, I'd even say that at this point is seems like a minor victory
> for our side. Some may want to consider the vanishing trick. If a
> situation on some articles deteriorates, I suggest noting that here, and
> we will deal with it.
>
> >     * Jehochman has been reprimanded and backed off
>
> Where was he reprimanded? Can we get a diff?
>

Here is the link to the thread where FloNight admonishes Jehocman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:FloNight#You.27re_not_listening

--0015174bdc10b06518046cfe76d0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Piotr K=
onieczny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204=
); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im"><a href=3D"mailto:PetersJV@aol.com">PetersJV@aol.com</a> =
wrote:<br>
&gt; Well, the last time Thatcher jumped the gun was when I was about to<br=
>
&gt; straighten out a situation and wound up on the &quot;notified&quot; li=
st. Given<br>
&gt; where this was headed, it came out as well as could be expected...<br>
<br>
</div>Indeed. Seems only Dig, Offliner and PU were put on 1RR (Dig was also=
<br>
blocked for a few days). Not counting multiple notifications and<br>
warnings, I&#39;d even say that at this point is seems like a minor victory=
<br>
for our side. Some may want to consider the vanishing trick. If a<br>
situation on some articles deteriorates, I suggest noting that here, and<br=
>
we will deal with it.<br>
<br>
&gt; =A0 =A0 * Jehochman has been reprimanded and backed off<br>
<br>
Where was he reprimanded? Can we get a diff?<br></blockquote><div><br>Here =
is the link to the thread where FloNight admonishes Jehocman<br><a href=3D"=
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:FloNight#You.27re_not_listening">htt=
p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:FloNight#You.27re_not_listening</a><br>
</div></div><br>

--0015174bdc10b06518046cfe76d0--


--===============0855911728671109868==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0855911728671109868==--


