X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu May 14 22:07:18 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f826636f0905141302h6a36e342l6eee0f6d980d4475@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6fb557d70905081213jfc18127odefe43314345115a@mail.gmail.com>
	<9d40e4ef0905090550o36fef8ccp3173f5b2af7cb8e1@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70905091128p5b006405l4d26ed9a7df23e3f@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0905141302h6a36e342l6eee0f6d980d4475@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 23:07:07 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0905141307n14ef6b4x95fef15a127b3b71@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.7
X-Spam_score_int: 7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I wasn't very clear about antivitrus. It is Avast that
	was recommended to me, and I saw it in action detecting nasty trojans.
	Not Avira, which is not bad but my impression was that it slowed my
	computer. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] antivirus software?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5594738561474318265=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.0
X-Spam_score_int: 20
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I wasn't very clear about antivitrus. It is Avast that
	was recommended to me, and I saw it in action detecting nasty trojans.
	Not Avira, which is not bad but my impression was that it slowed my
	computer. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4999]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5594738561474318265==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dbdea75505d10469e4df12

--0016e6dbdea75505d10469e4df12
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I wasn't very clear about antivitrus. It is Avast that was recommended to
me, and I saw it in action detecting nasty trojans. Not Avira, which is not
bad but my impression was that it slowed my computer.

--0016e6dbdea75505d10469e4df12
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>I wasn&#39;t very clear about antivitrus. It is Avast that was recommend=
ed to me, and I saw it in action detecting nasty trojans. Not Avira, which =
is=A0not bad=A0but my impression was that it slowed my computer.</p>

--0016e6dbdea75505d10469e4df12--


--===============5594738561474318265==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5594738561474318265==--


