X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 22 05:19:13 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211321m5e3365cev3639f9d025c0d870@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ca3.534dabe2.376d98de@aol.com>
	<4f045a880906191952h2c73b422w3e746cce1bf2ed5f@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880906191958u733dd063if7cd1f77d349e7be@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3E5CD3.6030301@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906211153w307205ceyb364d7ebcf5c45aa@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211321m5e3365cev3639f9d025c0d870@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:18:55 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880906212018g3f08d3f7w92522d22293cbca5@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 21:53, radek
	szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > > *We are probably better
	organized
	- and by that I don't mean just this >> list, a lot of this
	organizations formed informally at some level >> before; I started
	watching a lot of you guyz's edits long before I >> joined this list -
	this is also a function of the experience. In >> contrast some of the
	other sides' attacks have been clumsy to say the >> least (PU's
	"children are molested there", Russavia generally sounds >> half way
	clueless - on the other hand Offliner and Skapperod can be >> quite
	sneaky) > > > By the way, Russavia's sudden drop of involvement looks
	somewhat like his > sudden increase of involvement in reverse. It's
	almost as though he > originally let Miyokan edit with him, and now he's
	kicked Miyokan out. > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] It isn't over.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0432342045776332271=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 21:53, radek
	szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > > *We are probably better organized
	- and by that I don't mean just this >> list, a lot of this
	organizations formed informally at some level >> before; I started
	watching a lot of you guyz's edits long before I >> joined this list -
	this is also a function of the experience. In >> contrast some of the
	other sides' attacks have been clumsy to say the >> least (PU's
	"children are molested there", Russavia generally sounds >> half way
	clueless - on the other hand Offliner and Skapperod can be >> quite
	sneaky) > > > By the way, Russavia's sudden drop of involvement looks
	somewhat like his > sudden increase of involvement in reverse. It's
	almost as though he > originally let Miyokan edit with him, and now he's
	kicked Miyokan out. > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0432342045776332271==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c17a891db84046ce75597

--0015174c17a891db84046ce75597
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 21:53, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> *We are probably better organized - and by that I don't mean just this
>> list, a lot of this organizations formed informally at some level
>> before; I started watching a lot of you guyz's edits long before I
>> joined this list - this is also a function of the experience. In
>> contrast some of the other sides' attacks have been clumsy to say the
>> least (PU's "children are molested there", Russavia generally sounds
>> half way clueless - on the other hand Offliner and Skapperod can be
>> quite sneaky)
>
>
> By the way, Russavia's sudden drop of involvement looks somewhat like his
> sudden increase of involvement in reverse.  It's almost as though he
> originally let Miyokan edit with him, and now he's kicked Miyokan out.
>

Given that PasswordUsername seems to have appeared at the same time
Russiavia's activity dropped, it wouldn't surprise me if Miyokan was
PasswordUsername.


>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0015174c17a891db84046ce75597
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Digwure=
n <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmai=
l.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"b=
order-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; paddin=
g-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 21:53,=
 radek szulga <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com" t=
arget=3D"_blank">rsszulga@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br></div><div cla=
ss=3D"im">

<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px =
solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">*W=
e are probably better organized - and by that I don&#39;t mean just this<br=
>

list, a lot of this organizations formed informally at some level<br>
before; I started watching a lot of you guyz&#39;s edits long before I<br>
joined this list - this is also a function of the experience. In<br>
contrast some of the other sides&#39; attacks have been clumsy to say the<b=
r>
least (PU&#39;s &quot;children are molested there&quot;, Russavia generally=
 sounds<br>
half way clueless - on the other hand Offliner and Skapperod can be<br>
quite sneaky)</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>By the way, Russavia&#3=
9;s sudden drop of involvement looks somewhat like his sudden increase of i=
nvolvement in reverse. =A0It&#39;s almost as though he originally let Miyok=
an edit with him, and now he&#39;s kicked Miyokan out.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br>Given that PasswordUsername seems to have appea=
red at the same time Russiavia&#39;s activity dropped, it wouldn&#39;t surp=
rise me if Miyokan was PasswordUsername.<br>=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"g=
mail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt=
 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div></div>
<div><br></div></div><font color=3D"#888888">-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0015174c17a891db84046ce75597--


--===============0432342045776332271==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0432342045776332271==--


