X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jun 18 21:34:12 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:33:56 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > I reported him to AE. Everyone is
	welcome to add more diffs. Igny showed up and claimed Offliner has been
	harassed by a long list of editors. Is it appropriate for me to insist
	that he withdraw the baseless accusations? Perhaps, it would be more
	profitable for somebody else to imply that when everybody is against
	Offliner, Offliner is more likely to be at fault? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5081271520424815661=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > I reported him to AE. Everyone is
	welcome to add more diffs. Igny showed up and claimed Offliner has been
	harassed by a long list of editors. Is it appropriate for me to insist
	that he withdraw the baseless accusations? Perhaps, it would be more
	profitable for somebody else to imply that when everybody is against
	Offliner, Offliner is more likely to be at fault? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5081271520424815661==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7786c1db825046ca47db4

--001485f7786c1db825046ca47db4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:

> I reported him to AE. Everyone is welcome to add more diffs.


Igny showed up and claimed Offliner has been harassed by a long list of
editors.  Is it appropriate for me to insist that he withdraw the baseless
accusations?  Perhaps, it would be more profitable for somebody else to
imply that when everybody is against Offliner, Offliner is more likely to be
at fault?

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001485f7786c1db825046ca47db4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:41, Andrei Dombay <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com">wikibiophys@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; paddi=
ng-left: 1ex;">
I reported him to AE. Everyone is welcome to add more diffs.</blockquote><d=
iv><br>Igny showed up and claimed Offliner has been harassed by a long list=
 of editors.=C2=A0 Is it appropriate for me to insist that he withdraw the =
baseless accusations?=C2=A0 Perhaps, it would be more profitable for somebo=
dy else to imply that when everybody is against Offliner, Offliner is more =
likely to be at fault?<br>
</div></div><br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001485f7786c1db825046ca47db4--


--===============5081271520424815661==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5081271520424815661==--


