X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Apr  9 23:37:26 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0904091308v7f156a6fmd0bae6ae8b6ba60b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0904091308v7f156a6fmd0bae6ae8b6ba60b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:37:10 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70904091437k34932773j86d731b43e745ebd@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  IMO Neo-Stalinism_in_21st_century is not a good
	template. You simply won't get enough RS to include Nochnoy Dozor (most
	of its members are just passionately pro-Russia but ideologically vague
	and not communist). With Dyukov it's easier, as he has directly
	glorified Stalin. Other than that, I _personally_ agree that the
	organisations & people you've included can be characterised as
	neo-Stalinist, but a would-be-encyclopedian in me runs riot. The thing
	remains OR and pointish. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] templates
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  IMO Neo-Stalinism_in_21st_century is not a good
	template. You simply won't get enough RS to include Nochnoy Dozor (most
	of its members are just passionately pro-Russia but ideologically vague
	and not communist). With Dyukov it's easier, as he has directly
	glorified Stalin. Other than that, I _personally_ agree that the
	organisations & people you've included can be characterised as
	neo-Stalinist, but a would-be-encyclopedian in me runs riot. The thing
	remains OR and pointish. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

IMO Neo-Stalinism_in_21st_century is not a good template. You simply
won't get enough RS to include Nochnoy Dozor (most of its members are
just passionately pro-Russia but ideologically vague and not
communist). With Dyukov it's easier, as he has directly glorified
Stalin. Other than that, I _personally_  agree that the organisations
& people you've included can be characterised as neo-Stalinist, but a
would-be-encyclopedian in me runs riot. The thing remains OR and
pointish.

Miacek.

On 09/04/2009, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> as some of you may have noticed, I've been working at *two* interesting
> templates recently: there's the {{Neo-Stalinism in 21st century}}, but
> there's also {{Historical revisionism}}.  It would seem that Russavia & co
> has not yet discovered the second one.
>
> Meanwhile, <
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Neo-Stalinism_in_21st_century>
> has been awfully quiet.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

