X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu May 28 04:09:16 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6fb557d70905270641r28576a62ga6f905fc181dc3b7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6fb557d70905270641r28576a62ga6f905fc181dc3b7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:08:48 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880905271908k767f69e0x293281e17837cf24@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I recall Colchicum declining in the past, but he may
	have changed his mind since. On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Miacek
	and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote: > Is
	Colchicum member of this list? Actually, I'd say he is worth being >
	promoted to a sysop, as he's both reliable and reasonable. We need >
	more knowledgeable admins. > > M. > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion
	list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] A wikipedian
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.6
X-Spam_score_int: 6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I recall Colchicum declining in the past, but he may
	have changed his mind since. On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Miacek
	and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote: > Is
	Colchicum member of this list? Actually, I'd say he is worth being >
	promoted to a sysop, as he's both reliable and reasonable. We need >
	more knowledgeable admins. > > M. > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion
	list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-1.1 BAYES_05               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5%
	[score: 0.0424]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I recall Colchicum declining in the past, but he may have changed his
mind since.

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Miacek and his crime-fighting dog
<miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Is Colchicum member of this list? Actually, I'd say he is worth being
> promoted to a sysop, as he's both reliable and reasonable. We need
> more knowledgeable admins.
>
> M.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

