X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri May 29 16:34:25 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6fb557d70905290510g2f01d0f4mb3f7926696939dae@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6fb557d70905290510g2f01d0f4mb3f7926696939dae@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:34:15 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0905290734n72aba5e5q3afd777a8d51e227@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 15:10, Miacek and his
	crime-fighting dog < miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, if anyone
	still hasn't noticed that procedure, then here it is > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Threat_by_User:Petri_Krohn
	> > Whilst en bloc voting is not a good idea (what is more: it is >
	counterproductive), we should keep an eye on those developments. I >
	sincerely hope, he'll get banned. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] banning Petr Krohn?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0821521481589361708=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 15:10, Miacek and his
	crime-fighting dog < miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, if anyone
	still hasn't noticed that procedure, then here it is > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Threat_by_User:Petri_Krohn
	> > Whilst en bloc voting is not a good idea (what is more: it is >
	counterproductive), we should keep an eye on those developments. I >
	sincerely hope, he'll get banned. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0821521481589361708==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7d90e877b63046b0df87f

--001485f7d90e877b63046b0df87f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 15:10, Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <
miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi, if anyone still hasn't noticed that procedure, then here it is
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Inci=
dents#Threat_by_User:Petri_Krohn
>
> Whilst en bloc voting is not a good idea (what is more: it is
> counterproductive), we should keep an eye on those developments. I
> sincerely hope, he'll get banned.


He got another one-year block.  Which is about as good, and probably
slightly harder to appeal.  Plus, there's a chance he won't come back after
the year.

A user like Petri
>
Krohn should have no place in Wikipedia.


What will Safka do now that their foremost link to Wikipedia is blocked?
 I'd say there's a chance that B=C3=A4ckman or Hietanen will become a regul=
ar.
 The anonymous user who has been hanging out at B=C3=A4ckman's article alre=
ady
may be one of them.

Then again, Safka may consider Finnish Wikipedia a more important outlet,
and AFAIK, Petri Krohn is not blocked there.

Speaking of anonymouses, certain details make me suspect that the anonymous
who has been chatting at HistoricWarrior007's talkpage is Kuban Kazak.  But
the evidence is currently scant, and he doesn't appear to have become a
major nuisance yet, so I don't think an action is viable at this time.

Shall we do something about Russavia's reiteration of the ideas that got
Petri Krohn banned?

--=20
Andres Soolo

--001485f7d90e877b63046b0df87f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 15:10, Miacek and his cr=
ime-fighting dog <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:miacek08@googlemai=
l.com">miacek08@googlemail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
Hi, if anyone still hasn&#39;t noticed that procedure, then here it is<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeb=
oard/Incidents#Threat_by_User:Petri_Krohn" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wiki=
pedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Threat_by_=
User:Petri_Krohn</a><br>

<br>
Whilst en bloc voting is not a good idea (what is more: it is<br>
counterproductive), we should keep an eye on those developments. I<br>
sincerely hope, he&#39;ll get banned.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>He go=
t another one-year block. =C2=A0Which is about as good, and probably slight=
ly harder to appeal. =C2=A0Plus, there&#39;s a chance he won&#39;t come bac=
k after the year.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">A user like Petri<br></block=
quote><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-l=
eft:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

Krohn should have no place in Wikipedia.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Wh=
at will Safka do now that their foremost link to Wikipedia is blocked? =C2=
=A0I&#39;d say there&#39;s a chance that B=C3=A4ckman or Hietanen will beco=
me a regular. =C2=A0The anonymous user who has been hanging out at B=C3=A4c=
kman&#39;s article already may be one of them.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Then again, Safka may consider Finnish Wikipedia a more=
 important outlet, and AFAIK, Petri Krohn is not blocked there.</div><div><=
br></div><div>Speaking of anonymouses, certain details make me suspect that=
 the anonymous who has been chatting at HistoricWarrior007&#39;s talkpage i=
s Kuban Kazak. =C2=A0But the evidence is currently scant, and he doesn&#39;=
t appear to have become a major nuisance yet, so I don&#39;t think an actio=
n is viable at this time.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Shall we do something about Russavia&#39;s reiteration =
of the ideas that got Petri Krohn banned?</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>=
Andres Soolo<br>

--001485f7d90e877b63046b0df87f--


--===============0821521481589361708==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0821521481589361708==--


