X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:31:13 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211428y5ea28c88wafdde68863c6a2bd@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3EA461.2050208@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906211423x2123ead9v1da04a5fa7e3242c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211428y5ea28c88wafdde68863c6a2bd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:30:53 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906211430n74ede828t87898697dbadcaa0@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:28, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > AN/I threads are very informal. They
	aren't "filed" as in arbitration; > instead, they're "started". This
	kind of thread consists of a brief summary > of what happened, a diff or
	two, and asking that other people "look into > it", or "clarify the
	relevant policy". Since you're not involved in the > question of
	whether
	Piotrus is involved ;) you won't even have to > participate in the
	following discussion (but you can). > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3559430190291161640=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:28, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > AN/I threads are very informal. They
	aren't "filed" as in arbitration; > instead, they're "started". This
	kind of thread consists of a brief summary > of what happened, a diff or
	two, and asking that other people "look into > it", or "clarify the
	relevant policy". Since you're not involved in the > question of whether
	Piotrus is involved ;) you won't even have to > participate in the
	following discussion (but you can). > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3559430190291161640==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cfafec04fd046ce278f1

--00504502cfafec04fd046ce278f1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:28, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> AN/I threads are very informal.  They aren't "filed" as in arbitration;
> instead, they're "started".  This kind of thread consists of a brief summary
> of what happened, a diff or two, and asking that other people "look into
> it", or "clarify the relevant policy".  Since you're not involved in the
> question of whether Piotrus is involved ;) you won't even have to
> participate in the following discussion (but you can).
>

What's your interest in this?  I think the best theory is that you were
keeping a watch over a fellow Pole's talkpage.  You shouldn't probably show
active involvement in the arbitration case, or it's going to get a lot
muddier.  After all, our position is that Polish affairs aren't involved in
this case.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--00504502cfafec04fd046ce278f1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:28, Digwuren <span di=
r=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&=
gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 =
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im"><span class=3D"Apple-style-spa=
n" style=3D"font-size: small;">AN/I threads are very informal. =C2=A0They a=
ren&#39;t &quot;filed&quot; as in arbitration; instead, they&#39;re &quot;s=
tarted&quot;. =C2=A0This kind of thread consists of a brief summary of what=
 happened, a diff or two, and asking that other people &quot;look into it&q=
uot;, or &quot;clarify the relevant policy&quot;. =C2=A0Since you&#39;re no=
t involved in the question of whether Piotrus is involved ;) you won&#39;t =
even have to participate in the following discussion (but you can).</span><=
/div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>What&#39;s your interest in this? =
=C2=A0I think the best theory is that you were keeping a watch over a fello=
w Pole&#39;s talkpage. =C2=A0You shouldn&#39;t probably show active involve=
ment in the arbitration case, or it&#39;s going to get a lot muddier. =C2=
=A0After all, our position is that Polish affairs aren&#39;t involved in th=
is case.</div>
<div><br></div><div>--=C2=A0<br></div></div>Andres Soolo<br>

--00504502cfafec04fd046ce278f1--


--===============3559430190291161640==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3559430190291161640==--


