X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  1 05:08:40 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0905311851j11a82d11pa278dc4ed7b6443f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0905231259r4ffb1fa7i350386b8cd565ea@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0905271342p2266776el5ab3e92702419fef@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A1E2E3F.30306@post.pl>
	<4f045a880905280014r457170ddu3799a8e8e7d9ceca@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A22A7EC.3010107@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0905310930p44d63c2h79337fc4b64eaead@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0905311005n1fa330a3qbb58a99607fdc86c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A22F6A3.6090300@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0905311648p1901ee52mc5ebfecb258e68bc@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0905311851j11a82d11pa278dc4ed7b6443f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 22:08:19 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0905312008m4cb43360q9d549cb2639607ae@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  This is pretty insane. Now Avi's saying that he's
	blocking Molobo for sock puppetry based solely on the publicly
	available
	evidence and hence there is no need to release the secret evidence.
	This
	despite the fact that we have at least three involved clerks and/or
	admins - Mayalld, nix eagle and AdjustShift - stating explicitly that
	the publicly available evidence was not sufficient. Hell, I think even
	Skapperod - the guy who brought this up - said somewhere that the
	publicly available evidence was not sufficient (I can't find this after
	all the mess with moving comments but I remember this). This really
	really stinks. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon and Molobo
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.0
X-Spam_score_int: 10
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  This is pretty insane. Now Avi's saying that he's
	blocking Molobo for sock puppetry based solely on the publicly available
	evidence and hence there is no need to release the secret evidence. This
	despite the fact that we have at least three involved clerks and/or
	admins - Mayalld, nix eagle and AdjustShift - stating explicitly that
	the publicly available evidence was not sufficient. Hell, I think even
	Skapperod - the guy who brought this up - said somewhere that the
	publicly available evidence was not sufficient (I can't find this after
	all the mess with moving comments but I remember this). This really
	really stinks. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4185]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

This is pretty insane. Now Avi's saying that he's blocking Molobo for
sock puppetry based solely on the publicly available evidence and
hence there is no need to release the secret evidence.
This despite the fact that we have at least three involved clerks
and/or admins  - Mayalld, nix eagle and AdjustShift - stating
explicitly that the publicly available evidence was not sufficient.
Hell, I think even Skapperod - the guy who brought this up - said
somewhere that the publicly available evidence was not sufficient (I
can't find this after all the mess with moving comments but I remember
this).
This really really stinks.

Radek

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

