X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Sep  6 19:11:23 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880909052347w7c16b90eq8f3c376a2ed7812f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4f045a880909032113r3873793fh58d4229ae9523edb@mail.gmail.com>
	<51803.15497.qm@web45107.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<c3b2b3db0909040642i333c291k17d6a7b0e899ef3@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0909040713w6455d0b5qfaf6261c86ccb43e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0909041205v3a9e2fal6c326c4ce33d6d38@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0909041232g2eaf7999s1044c1c0571a5685@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0909041309j2fb27201qa00aec48a341bd2c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880909041319r11cb1bc8x6fe00eb8245b7d22@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0909041435t1e7ef4c3n3502576c66747b5d@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880909052347w7c16b90eq8f3c376a2ed7812f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 20:11:19 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0909061011v41fde567ta833e17ff6bf8b37@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 09:47, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > I regret jumping in with my comments now,
	I went in too hard and gave > Rjanag an excuse to do nothing. > Don't.
	First, it's useless and second, in this kind of dysfunctional
	collectives, excuses are *always* found -- even if your conduct is
	impeccable. The trick is to make sure that the administrator *wants* to
	only make up excuses in ways you find beneficial. Or so I have heard.
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] PU escapes clear 3RR violation
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6489422064756446579=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 09:47, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > I regret jumping in with my comments now,
	I went in too hard and gave > Rjanag an excuse to do nothing. > Don't.
	First, it's useless and second, in this kind of dysfunctional
	collectives, excuses are *always* found -- even if your conduct is
	impeccable. The trick is to make sure that the administrator *wants* to
	only make up excuses in ways you find beneficial. Or so I have heard.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6489422064756446579==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e644c6ea6ad6080472ebd2be

--0016e644c6ea6ad6080472ebd2be
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 09:47, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:

> I regret jumping in with my comments now, I went in too hard and gave
> Rjanag an excuse to do nothing.
>

Don't.  First, it's useless and second, in this kind of dysfunctional
collectives, excuses are *always* found -- even if your conduct is
impeccable.  The trick is to make sure that the administrator *wants* to
only make up excuses in ways you find beneficial.  Or so I have heard.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e644c6ea6ad6080472ebd2be
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 09:47, Martin <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:martint20@gmail.com">martint20@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I regret jumping in with my comments now, I went in too hard and gave<br>
Rjanag an excuse to do nothing.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Don&#39=
;t. =C2=A0First, it&#39;s useless and second, in this kind of dysfunctional=
 collectives, excuses are *always* found -- even if your conduct is impecca=
ble. =C2=A0The trick is to make sure that the administrator *wants* to only=
 make up excuses in ways you find beneficial. =C2=A0Or so I have heard.</di=
v>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e644c6ea6ad6080472ebd2be--


--===============6489422064756446579==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6489422064756446579==--


