X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul 31 22:05:38 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A734EAE.90304@post.pl>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:06:06 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <628973.19764.qm@web32801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	<BAY110-W372FEBBA66EC2D6A27A1B8D6100@phx.gbl>	<4A728F86.1040500@post.pl>	<929ed1ec0907310218i2adb2acfra83ac1c6610068f3@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0907310458q598be4d8p3e8fadd59b14c7b8@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0907310501p7fd9b8bfrbd65ee46d2a96e28@mail.gmail.com>	<6c9a05ec0907310511v6f81f3ai169b56058116c0e3@mail.gmail.com>	<6c9a05ec0907310852y39a3d9bckc8bfaba7b94329f8@mail.gmail.com>	<4A732047.4000103@post.pl>	<25890ca0907311026h184e74aclbf9fe8695c385000@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907311240k1ebca443webd6a596610fb94@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0907311240k1ebca443webd6a596610fb94@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: radek szulga wrote: > Faustian responded to my email
	about whether he'd retract his complaint > by saying: > "Yes, of course.
	If he agrees to stop attacking me and changing the > order with no
	discussion I will retract my complaint." > > I think at this point if
	Richard says something about getting upset > about it and using an
	inappropriate tone (some of those remarks were too > sharp edged) and
	voluntarily promises to stay away from the article in > order to cool
	off, then the whole matter can probably be dropped. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] HELP!! Radek , Piotrus, Tymek and others.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > Faustian responded to my email
	about whether he'd retract his complaint > by saying: > "Yes, of course.
	If he agrees to stop attacking me and changing the > order with no
	discussion I will retract my complaint." > > I think at this point if
	Richard says something about getting upset > about it and using an
	inappropriate tone (some of those remarks were too > sharp edged) and
	voluntarily promises to stay away from the article in > order to cool
	off, then the whole matter can probably be dropped. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

radek szulga wrote:
> Faustian responded to my email about whether he'd retract his complaint 
> by saying:
> "Yes, of course.  If he agrees to stop attacking me and changing the 
> order with no discussion I will retract my complaint."
> 
> I think at this point if Richard says something about getting upset 
> about it and using an inappropriate tone (some of those remarks were too 
> sharp edged) and voluntarily promises to stay away from the article in 
> order to cool off, then the whole matter can probably be dropped.

It should be possible to reason it out with Faustian.

Lvivske I've reported to AE, his behavior is above and beyond unhelpful 
(just take a look at the diffs):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Lvivske

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

