X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul 11 23:22:42 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 999921.2990.bm@omp205.mail.sp1.yahoo.com
Message-ID: <881355.41201.qm@web45111.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: zXQ4vMgVM1loZPGs45jrrWZ0FME3HibrIhRlKPgnhkXCQ7Y_A7illlljo7ep6a0zHMZkLe1KvW7U0X6XZtnJV5a0mfi3mCQSMWqhLUtgIjqWlTxO.wsLCYMg5yI8p7BIEtJKNAPOnCOsVYrmWHKKzqq3S8Xch22mzosLdwKny8zpyKwqiIzgGmAFclEdRN7dxg77VkWY2jRjGXNNmN9hxWzvlqBGtdDqGVR.4nx0CZc0L_Ff8oOcZ1AolyNchd16yf.x5JyWh7SaETqBQYXMwovv4tv6fjNGr.E9LEm1aK0YPuWA
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/6.0.18 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0907111323p3a258ac2i8fa60bbb959e0750@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Agree, then Radek can't file it, we have to think who
	would be the best person to file the report. I consider myself , I'm
	pretending to be "friends" with him but this could change right?, or
	Tymek or somebody else on the sidelines . What do you think? Jacek
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] RfC regarding Skapperod
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2807818209754998461=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Agree, then Radek can't file it, we have to think who
	would be the best person to file the report. I consider myself , I'm
	pretending to be "friends" with him but this could change right?, or
	Tymek or somebody else on the sidelines . What do you think? Jacek [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============2807818209754998461==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1058702287-1247347350=:41201"


--0-1058702287-1247347350=:41201
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Agree, then Radek can't=A0file it, we have to think who would be the best p=
erson to file the report. I consider myself , I'm=A0pretending to be=A0"fri=
ends" with him but this could change right?, or Tymek or somebody else on t=
he sidelines=A0. What do you think?
Jacek

--- On Sat, 7/11/09, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:


From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [WPM] RfC regarding Skapperod
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Saturday, July 11, 2009, 12:23 PM


I think we should wait on the RfC until we have a pretty strong case - othe=
rwise it might be seen the same way that Skapperod's latest is being interp=
reted, as just more Eastern European bickering and spurious reports.=20
We should save Sandstein's comments [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti=
tle=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=3Dnext&oldid=3D301570=
502] and Adjust Shift's pleading [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=
=3DUser_talk:Sandstein&diff=3D301581443&oldid=3D301571717]
to use as part of the RfC in the future.

Radek



2009/7/11 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>

To all email users-this message comes with text file where I wrote
down my earlier draft of my RFC against Skapperod.

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks



-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
=0A=0A=0A      
--0-1058702287-1247347350=:41201
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;"><DIV>Agree, then Radek can't&nbsp;file it, we=
 have to think who would be the best person to file the report. I consider =
myself , I'm&nbsp;pretending to be&nbsp;"friends" with him but this could c=
hange right?, or Tymek or somebody else on the sidelines&nbsp;. What do you=
 think?</DIV>
<DIV>Jacek</DIV>
<DIV><BR>--- On <B>Sat, 7/11/09, radek szulga <I>&lt;rsszulga@gmail.com&gt;=
</I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(=
16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: radek szulga &lt;rsszulga@gmail.com&gt;<BR>=
Subject: Re: [WPM] RfC regarding Skapperod<BR>To: "Wikipedia statistics" &l=
t;folks@wikipedometer.net&gt;<BR>Date: Saturday, July 11, 2009, 12:23 PM<BR=
><BR>
<DIV id=3Dyiv1381159695>I think we should wait on the RfC until we have a p=
retty strong case - otherwise it might be seen the same way that Skapperod'=
s latest is being interpreted, as just more Eastern European bickering and =
spurious reports. <BR>We should save Sandstein's comments [<A href=3D"http:=
//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enfor=
cement&amp;diff=3Dnext&amp;oldid=3D301570502" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollo=
w>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Request=
s/Enforcement&amp;diff=3Dnext&amp;oldid=3D301570502</A>] and Adjust Shift's=
 pleading [<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk=
:Sandstein&amp;diff=3D301581443&amp;oldid=3D301571717" target=3D_blank rel=
=3Dnofollow>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Sandstein=
&amp;diff=3D301581443&amp;oldid=3D301571717</A>]<BR>to use as part of the R=
fC in the future.<BR><BR>Radek<BR><BR><BR>
<DIV class=3Dgmail_quote>2009/7/11 Molobo Molobo <SPAN dir=3Dltr>&lt;<A hre=
f=3D"http://us.mc451.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=3Dmolobus@gmail.com" targ=
et=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow ymailto=3D"mailto:molobus@gmail.com">molobus@gma=
il.com</A>&gt;</SPAN><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dgmail_quote style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt=
 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">To all email users-thi=
s message comes with text file where I wrote<BR>down my earlier draft of my=
 RFC against Skapperod.<BR><BR>____________________________________________=
___<BR>Wikipedia statistics discussion list<BR><A href=3D"http://us.mc451.m=
ail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=3Dfolks@wikipedometer.net" target=3D_blank rel=
=3Dnofollow ymailto=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.=
net</A><BR><A href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fol=
ks" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow>http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman=
/listinfo/folks</A><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV><BR>-----Inline Att=
achment Follows-----<BR><BR>
<DIV class=3DplainMail>_______________________________________________<BR>W=
ikipedia statistics discussion list<BR><A href=3D"http://us.mc451.mail.yaho=
o.com/mc/compose?to=3Dfolks@wikipedometer.net" ymailto=3D"mailto:folks@wiki=
pedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</A><BR><A href=3D"http://wikipedomet=
er.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=3D_blank>http://wikipedometer=
..net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></t=
able><br>=0A=0A      
--0-1058702287-1247347350=:41201--



--===============2807818209754998461==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2807818209754998461==--



