X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 29 14:52:20 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906290547y6e7bfe74jd465952c5a87297f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <166060.56617.qm@web32805.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<25890ca0906290547y6e7bfe74jd465952c5a87297f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:52:00 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0906290552p6312c549r2c1fb747c905d663@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Women have a lot of more important things to do. On
	Mon, 
	Jun 29, 2009 at 8:47 AM, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > I
	think it's because Wikipedia is essentially 1) nerdy (in a good way) >
	and 2) combative (despite what they keep telling us). My wife seems to
	>
	see it as "one of those things guys just do" - she gets annoyed if I >
	spent too much time on it, which I do, but she also likes hearing >
	about the articles I'm editing and the struggles that go on ("which >
	faction are you warring with now? Who are they aligned with? How is >
	that strategy going to work? Did you get that guy banned?") but she >
	might be just showing supportive, though fake, interest. > She's also
	sort of one of those sociology types so she's into the > whole issue of
	how knowledge is created, disseminated and manipulated, > how "facts"
	are framed and presented and so on (overall that kind of > approach is
	a
	bit too "post-modern" for me, but there's some truth to > it). > > Radek
	> > 2009/6/28 piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>: > > Sorry, I messed
	it up, my hand slipped, and I accidentally pressed send. > > > > Has
	anybody ever wondered why there are so few female editors? I do not >
	keep > > tabs, but my hunch is that some 90% of editors are men. Why is
	that? Or > > perhaps they share my wife's opinion, she says that instead
	of Wikipedia, > I > > should do something useful, and is often pissed
	off when she sees me > writing > > stuff for the project > > > > Sorry
	again for the mistake, my bad > > Tymek > > > > --- On Sun, 6/28/09,
	piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > From: piotr micula
	<basiaipiotr@yahoo.com> > > Subject: [WPM] Women and Wiklp > > To:
	folks@wikipedometer.net > > Date: Sunday, June 28, 2009, 10:29 PM > > >
	> > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > > > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > > folks@wikipedometer.net > >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > > > > > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > > folks@wikipedometer.net > >
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Women and Wiklp
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4013939817791134143=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Women have a lot of more important things to do. On Mon,
	Jun 29, 2009 at 8:47 AM, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > I
	think it's because Wikipedia is essentially 1) nerdy (in a good way) >
	and 2) combative (despite what they keep telling us). My wife seems to >
	see it as "one of those things guys just do" - she gets annoyed if I >
	spent too much time on it, which I do, but she also likes hearing >
	about the articles I'm editing and the struggles that go on ("which >
	faction are you warring with now? Who are they aligned with? How is >
	that strategy going to work? Did you get that guy banned?") but she >
	might be just showing supportive, though fake, interest. > She's also
	sort of one of those sociology types so she's into the > whole issue of
	how knowledge is created, disseminated and manipulated, > how "facts"
	are framed and presented and so on (overall that kind of > approach is a
	bit too "post-modern" for me, but there's some truth to > it). > > Radek
	> > 2009/6/28 piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>: > > Sorry, I messed
	it up, my hand slipped, and I accidentally pressed send. > > > > Has
	anybody ever wondered why there are so few female editors? I do not >
	keep > > tabs, but my hunch is that some 90% of editors are men. Why is
	that? Or > > perhaps they share my wife's opinion, she says that instead
	of Wikipedia, > I > > should do something useful, and is often pissed
	off when she sees me > writing > > stuff for the project > > > > Sorry
	again for the mistake, my bad > > Tymek > > > > --- On Sun, 6/28/09,
	piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > From: piotr micula
	<basiaipiotr@yahoo.com> > > Subject: [WPM] Women and Wiklp > > To:
	folks@wikipedometer.net > > Date: Sunday, June 28, 2009, 10:29 PM > > >
	> > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > > > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > > folks@wikipedometer.net > >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > > > > > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > > folks@wikipedometer.net > >
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4013939817791134143==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6cd06ee978e046d7c27b8

--001485f6cd06ee978e046d7c27b8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Women have a lot of more important things to do.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:47 AM, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think it's because Wikipedia is essentially 1) nerdy (in a good way)
> and 2) combative (despite what they keep telling us). My wife seems to
> see it as "one of those things guys just do" - she gets annoyed if I
> spent too much time on it, which I do, but she also likes hearing
> about the articles I'm editing and the struggles that go on ("which
> faction are you warring with now? Who are they aligned with? How is
> that strategy going to work? Did you get that guy banned?") but she
> might be just showing supportive, though fake, interest.
> She's also sort of one of those sociology types so she's into the
> whole issue of how knowledge is created, disseminated and manipulated,
> how "facts" are framed and presented and so on (overall that kind of
> approach is a bit too "post-modern" for me, but there's some truth to
> it).
>
> Radek
>
> 2009/6/28 piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>:
> > Sorry, I messed it up, my hand slipped, and I accidentally pressed send.
> >
> > Has anybody ever wondered why there are so few female editors? I do not
> keep
> > tabs, but my hunch is that some 90% of editors are men. Why is that? Or
> > perhaps they share my wife's opinion, she says that instead of Wikipedia,
> I
> > should do something useful, and is often pissed off when she sees me
> writing
> > stuff for the project
> >
> > Sorry again for the mistake, my bad
> > Tymek
> >
> > --- On Sun, 6/28/09, piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>
> > Subject: [WPM] Women and Wiklp
> > To: folks@wikipedometer.net
> > Date: Sunday, June 28, 2009, 10:29 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> > folks@wikipedometer.net
> > http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> > folks@wikipedometer.net
> > http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--001485f6cd06ee978e046d7c27b8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Women have a lot of more important things to do.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:47 AM, radek szulga <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rsszulga@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I think it&#39;s because Wikipedia is essentially 1) nerdy (in a good way)<br>
and 2) combative (despite what they keep telling us). My wife seems to<br>
see it as &quot;one of those things guys just do&quot; - she gets annoyed if I<br>
spent too much time on it, which I do, but she also likes hearing<br>
about the articles I&#39;m editing and the struggles that go on (&quot;which<br>
faction are you warring with now? Who are they aligned with? How is<br>
that strategy going to work? Did you get that guy banned?&quot;) but she<br>
might be just showing supportive, though fake, interest.<br>
She&#39;s also sort of one of those sociology types so she&#39;s into the<br>
whole issue of how knowledge is created, disseminated and manipulated,<br>
how &quot;facts&quot; are framed and presented and so on (overall that kind of<br>
approach is a bit too &quot;post-modern&quot; for me, but there&#39;s some truth to<br>
it).<br>
<br>
Radek<br>
<br>
2009/6/28 piotr micula &lt;<a href="mailto:basiaipiotr@yahoo.com">basiaipiotr@yahoo.com</a>&gt;:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">&gt; Sorry, I messed it up, my hand slipped, and I accidentally pressed send.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Has anybody ever wondered why there are so few female editors? I do not keep<br>
&gt; tabs, but my hunch is that some 90% of editors are men. Why is that? Or<br>
&gt; perhaps they share my wife&#39;s opinion, she says that instead of Wikipedia, I<br>
&gt; should do something useful, and is often pissed off when she sees me writing<br>
&gt; stuff for the project<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Sorry again for the mistake, my bad<br>
&gt; Tymek<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; --- On Sun, 6/28/09, piotr micula &lt;<a href="mailto:basiaipiotr@yahoo.com">basiaipiotr@yahoo.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; From: piotr micula &lt;<a href="mailto:basiaipiotr@yahoo.com">basiaipiotr@yahoo.com</a>&gt;<br>
&gt; Subject: [WPM] Women and Wiklp<br>
&gt; To: <a href="mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
&gt; Date: Sunday, June 28, 2009, 10:29 PM<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; -----Inline Attachment Follows-----<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
&gt; <a href="mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
&gt; <a href="http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target="_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
&gt; <a href="mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
&gt; <a href="http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target="_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href="mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href="http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target="_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--001485f6cd06ee978e046d7c27b8--


--===============4013939817791134143==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4013939817791134143==--


