X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul 10 19:41:49 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0907101027u3d76c419ybf175d5371fac79@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0907100904x6ad1a4bai5f0228231ecafe1f@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907101027u3d76c419ybf175d5371fac79@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:41:38 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0907101041qbf47afalf00e91046741b8ce@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: " if anti-Piskorski sources could be found to back up
	the > town's website " I think the case here could be with Skapperod
	manipulating Piskorski or selectively quoting him. I read fragments of
	Piskorski's Kolonizacja wiejska Pomorza Zachodniego-about german
	colonisation of West Pomerania( a topic dear to Skapperod's heart) and
	he went at great lenght to show that first ethnically motivated
	expulsions in Pomerania happened around 12th century against Slavic
	population by German colonists. That certainly doesn't fit the picture
	of Piskorski one gets reading Skapperod's edits based on his alledged
	writings. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM]
	=?iso-8859-2?q?Sneaky_blanking_by_Skapperod_in_Ko=B3obrzeg_?=
	=?iso-8859-2?q?article?=
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  " if anti-Piskorski sources could be found to back up
	the > town's website " I think the case here could be with Skapperod
	manipulating Piskorski or selectively quoting him. I read fragments of
	Piskorski's Kolonizacja wiejska Pomorza Zachodniego-about german
	colonisation of West Pomerania( a topic dear to Skapperod's heart) and
	he went at great lenght to show that first ethnically motivated
	expulsions in Pomerania happened around 12th century against Slavic
	population by German colonists. That certainly doesn't fit the picture
	of Piskorski one gets reading Skapperod's edits based on his alledged
	writings. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

" if anti-Piskorski sources could be found to back up the
> town's website "

I think the case here could be with Skapperod manipulating Piskorski
or selectively quoting him. I read fragments of Piskorski's
Kolonizacja wiejska Pomorza Zachodniego-about german colonisation of
West Pomerania( a topic dear to Skapperod's heart) and he went at
great lenght to show that first ethnically motivated expulsions in
Pomerania happened around 12th century against Slavic population by
German colonists.
That certainly doesn't fit the picture of Piskorski one gets reading
Skapperod's edits based on his alledged writings.

W dniu 10 lipca 2009 19:27 u=BFytkownik radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> n=
apisa=B3:
> Skapperod opened up the topic yet again:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Town.=
27s_website_contradicts_scholary_sources
>
> and I think on this one this time we might need some help and input. It
> would also be good if anti-Piskorski sources could be found to back up the
> town's website (I might actually be in Kolobrzeg soon and might make a tr=
ip
> to find out the sources behind the website - but that's in a few weeks)
>
> Radek
>
>
> 2009/7/10 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
>>
>> Skapperod deleted information about Slavic history of Ko=B3obrzeg coming
>> rom the city authorities. He manipulated his explanation by stating
>> "per RSN". However the link shows only one responce and seems to be
>> attempt by Skapperod to bypass prior discussions in which Skapperod's
>> attempts to cenzor Polish city authorities in history sections of
>> Polish cities have been rejected.
>> The blanking in question
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3Dprev&o=
ldid=3D301331769
>>
>>
>> Previous debates in which Skapperod was rejected:
>>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Arch=
ive_24#Towns.27_websites_as_a_source_for_history
>>
>>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources/archive_20#=
Websites_of_towns
>>
>> And here:
>>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Arch=
ive_24#Towns.27_websites_acceptable_as_a_temporary_source_for_history
>>
>>
>> Note that it has been determined that those sources are always
>> reliable source in terms of showing what city authorities declare, and
>> city authorities are of course notable sources of information about
>> the city. No matter how Skapperod tries to delete them(as they show
>> non-German history) he can always be countered using above argument.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

