X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 22 09:48:23 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211522t16b93620r8ff75fc90b7ac43@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906211423x2123ead9v1da04a5fa7e3242c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211428y5ea28c88wafdde68863c6a2bd@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211430n74ede828t87898697dbadcaa0@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211432i395bb0d1v4ace9d2f4da52cc4@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211438u405219b9se5a775761f8b8a7e@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211441w1782cb63x753f942d98d167bb@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211507t40b06546n96fa2e485f48ec5@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211511v542ad8dj252f7043e6eb1bb8@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211522t16b93620r8ff75fc90b7ac43@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:48:09 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906220048o1bd16f26s683aa972f64c1c59@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:22, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > This seems to fit Newyorkbrad just fine.
	He's active, too. > I have messed up the days. Newyorkbrad wasn't
	active, and still isn't. :-( [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7169388852403123186=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:22, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > This seems to fit Newyorkbrad just fine.
	He's active, too. > I have messed up the days. Newyorkbrad wasn't
	active, and still isn't. :-( [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7169388852403123186==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7841d63237c046ceb18e5

--0016e6d7841d63237c046ceb18e5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:22, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> This seems to fit Newyorkbrad just fine.  He's active, too.
>

I have messed up the days.  Newyorkbrad wasn't active, and still isn't. :-(

In order to speed up arbitrative interest, do we need to contact anybody
else from arbcom?

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6d7841d63237c046ceb18e5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:22, Digwuren <span di=
r=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&=
gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 =
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">This seems to fit Newyorkbrad =
just fine. =C2=A0He&#39;s active, too.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></d=
iv><div>I have messed up the days. =C2=A0Newyorkbrad wasn&#39;t active, and=
 still isn&#39;t. :-(</div>
<div><br></div><div>In order to speed up arbitrative interest, do we need t=
o contact anybody else from arbcom?</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres=
 Soolo<br>

--0016e6d7841d63237c046ceb18e5--


--===============7169388852403123186==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7169388852403123186==--


