X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Apr 30 00:39:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <761602.3692.qm@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: .EKR9uIVM1lOO4If8QZe0YPPqM7q3lGsxTfkOkVpCKPgAJF8QpwHsP1Xdg48TrD5473tHUJKG58JhULf0BjD8_St.T.lyM2hT78hqyPH5OvVrzEZ9vpRIWMC.1JUx1P1rwdRYqAMn.KwQ.yMlHmRJ11Q982e_HNpVvR75mkNLKCnz2llujcbN5ZNfaHzX00geSHNepo5r8EmLxG.amb8wt6EXBiqhTxkgKQU.pJ_PajJ0dWNl5rDGftwy6CPBisUi5VB4Zm15ukZnp1pyxFkHN4flr_Dnr2lzB8TEB_WqPp_19GMsQ--
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.2.20 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I have another one of my ideas,
	only less dangerous than
	the last one. Now that [[Russian apartment bombings]] has been
	protected, how about I start a new section on the talk page? Playing the
	naif, I'd say something like: "It's clear the FSB, wanting to cement its
	power in the Russian state and needing a good crisis to do so and
	relaunch its stalled war in Chechnya, orchestrated these bombings. Those
	people have no compunction about killing their own civilians - just
	look
	at the [[January Events]] or the [[April 9 tragedy]], to say nothing of
	the [[Gulag]]. The question is: why are some here so eager to hide that
	fact? Don't we want to expose the truth behind the criminal, dictatorial
	regime in Moscow, to shine the spotlight on these gross human rights
	violations? Surely all right-thinking individuals hope to see the
	downfall of Putin and the dawn of liberal, multiparty democracy in
	Russia?" Good idea or not? The responses are bound to be amusing, at any
	rate. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] Good idea?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7557616924627500266=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.1
X-Spam_score_int: 21
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I have another one of my ideas, only less dangerous than
	the last one. Now that [[Russian apartment bombings]] has been
	protected, how about I start a new section on the talk page? Playing the
	naif, I'd say something like: "It's clear the FSB, wanting to cement its
	power in the Russian state and needing a good crisis to do so and
	relaunch its stalled war in Chechnya, orchestrated these bombings. Those
	people have no compunction about killing their own civilians - just look
	at the [[January Events]] or the [[April 9 tragedy]], to say nothing of
	the [[Gulag]]. The question is: why are some here so eager to hide that
	fact? Don't we want to expose the truth behind the criminal, dictatorial
	regime in Moscow, to shine the spotlight on these gross human rights
	violations? Surely all right-thinking individuals hope to see the
	downfall of Putin and the dawn of liberal, multiparty democracy in
	Russia?" Good idea or not? The responses are bound to be amusing, at any
	rate. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4876]
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============7557616924627500266==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-331394733-1241044771=:3692"


--0-331394733-1241044771=:3692
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have another one of my ideas, only less dangerous than the last one. Now =
that [[Russian apartment bombings]] has been protected, how about I start a=
 new section on the talk page? Playing the naif, I'd say something like:
"It's clear the FSB, wanting to cement its power in the Russian state and n=
eeding a good crisis to do so and relaunch its stalled war in Chechnya, orc=
hestrated these bombings. Those people have no compunction about killing th=
eir own civilians - just look at the [[January Events]] or the [[April 9 tr=
agedy]], to say nothing of the [[Gulag]]. The question is: why are some her=
e so eager to hide that fact? Don't we want=A0to expose the truth behind th=
e criminal, dictatorial regime in Moscow, to shine the spotlight on these g=
ross human rights violations? Surely all right-thinking individuals hope to=
 see the downfall of Putin and the dawn of liberal, multiparty democracy in=
 Russia?"
Good idea or not? The responses are bound to be amusing, at any rate.=0A=0A=
=0A      
--0-331394733-1241044771=:3692
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;">I have another one of my ideas, only less dan=
gerous than the last one. Now that [[Russian apartment bombings]] has been =
protected, how about I start a new section on the talk page? Playing the <s=
pan class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-style: italic;">naif</span>, I=
'd say something like:<div><br></div><div>"It's clear the FSB, wanting to c=
ement its power in the Russian state and needing a good crisis to do so and=
 relaunch its stalled war in Chechnya, orchestrated these bombings. Those p=
eople have no compunction about killing their own civilians - just look at =
the [[January Events]] or the [[April 9 tragedy]], to say nothing of the [[=
Gulag]]. The question is: why are some here so eager to hide that fact? Don=
't we <span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-style: italic;">want</=
span>=A0to expose the truth behind the criminal, dictatorial regime in Mosc=
ow, to shine
 the spotlight on these gross human rights violations? Surely all right-thi=
nking individuals hope to see the downfall of Putin and the dawn of liberal=
, multiparty democracy in Russia?"</div><div><br></div><div>Good idea or no=
t? The responses are bound to be amusing, at any rate.</div></td></tr></tab=
le><br>=0A=0A      
--0-331394733-1241044771=:3692--


--===============7557616924627500266==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7557616924627500266==--


