X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 10 20:44:19 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f826636f0906101014x73cee7d7sda094352d4c50539@mail.gmail.com>
References: <371738.50475.qm@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<6fb557d70906100521u77e91643k2f1ec406797a72f2@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0906100905r5fd5e1edn30d99b8e2984152b@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906100926k5885b4fdwd0e866cf4ce47d12@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0906101014x73cee7d7sda094352d4c50539@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:44:06 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906101144x576fa5ffp888507390e40e86e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: 2009/6/10 Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com> >
	Come
	on, 95% of the European officials are euro-utopists and often loose >>
	connection with reality. >> > True. That's where the European
	bureaucrats (or Eurocrats) come into play. One of the reasons why there
	has to be so many of them is to make sure that silly projects can not
	be carried through too fast. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] EU elections
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1492973228514968078=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  2009/6/10 Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com> > Come
	on, 95% of the European officials are euro-utopists and often loose >>
	connection with reality. >> > True. That's where the European
	bureaucrats (or Eurocrats) come into play. One of the reasons why there
	has to be so many of them is to make sure that silly projects can not be
	carried through too fast. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1492973228514968078==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5ad4d3292e6046c02dc67

--001636c5ad4d3292e6046c02dc67
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

2009/6/10 Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>

> Come on, 95% of the European officials are euro-utopists and often loose
>> connection with reality.
>>
>
True.  That's where the European bureaucrats (or Eurocrats) come into play.
 One of the reasons why there has to be so many of them is to make sure that
silly projects can not be carried through too fast.


> As for military integration, why would you want to build something to
>> replace NATO unless you are anti-NATO?
>>
>
It depends on the applicable military doctrine.  In general, heterogeneous
structures are less vulnerable to systemic troubles, but costlier to
maintain.  It might be claimed that having a para-NATO makes EU stronger.
 But then again, NATO is itself organised in a rather heterogeneous manner,
so in the current political climate, I don't think it's necessary.  In
particular, it probably is not worth the cost.

During the communist regime, Vadim ran a pamphlet magazine famous for
>> attacking dissidents. Becali is half-literate. What "constructive" you
>> expect from them? During the famous December 2006 Basescu's speech in the
>> Romanian Parliament with the report of the presidential commission
>> condamning communism, Vadim ran an ugly circus, interrupting it 20 times.
>>
>
Ah.  That sort of circus.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5ad4d3292e6046c02dc67
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/6/10 Dorin Cheptea <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a=
 href=3D"mailto:dorin.cheptea@gmail.com">dorin.cheptea@gmail.com</a>&gt;</s=
pan><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border=
-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quo=
te" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"=
><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div><div>Come on, 95% of the European official=
s are euro-utopists and often loose connection with reality.</div>
</div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>True.=
 =C2=A0That&#39;s where the European bureaucrats (or Eurocrats) come into p=
lay. =C2=A0One of the reasons why there has to be so many of them is to mak=
e sure that silly projects can not be carried through too fast.</div>
<div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8=
ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"=
><div class=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div><div>As for military integration, why would=
 you want to build something to replace NATO unless you are anti-NATO?</div=
></div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It d=
epends on the applicable military doctrine. =C2=A0In general, heterogeneous=
 structures are less vulnerable to systemic troubles, but costlier to maint=
ain. =C2=A0It might be claimed that having a para-NATO makes EU stronger. =
=C2=A0But then again, NATO is itself organised in a rather heterogeneous ma=
nner, so in the current political climate, I don&#39;t think it&#39;s neces=
sary. =C2=A0In particular, it probably is not worth the cost.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><=
div class=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8=
ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div><div>During the communist regime, Vadim ran=
 a pamphlet magazine famous for attacking dissidents. Becali is half-litera=
te. What &quot;constructive&quot; you expect from them? During the famous D=
ecember 2006 Basescu&#39;s speech in the Romanian Parliament with the repor=
t of the presidential commission condamning communism, Vadim ran an ugly ci=
rcus, interrupting it 20 times.</div>
</div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Ah. =
=C2=A0That sort of circus.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br=
>

--001636c5ad4d3292e6046c02dc67--


--===============1492973228514968078==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1492973228514968078==--


