X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Sep  8 20:25:23 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4AA6A018.7070802@post.pl>
References: <184746.12419.qm@web45113.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<4AA6A018.7070802@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 20:25:14 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0909081125h249d985te9bdd442d8da1666@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  However Piotrus,
	this means we do lose a contributor who
	was able to absorb time and effort of unfriendly contributors, and who
	did patricipate in votes. additionally Skapperod would gain credibility
	as "victim" and productive member of Wiki community. I agree that Xx236
	is completely clueless as to avoiding personal attacks, but still I
	think a word or two of warning to him to stop it might avoid a ban. If
	he continues-well it's sad, but like Hanzo some people are unable to
	exploit Wiki doublespeak. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Xx236 needs help.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6927561764785712918=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  However Piotrus, this means we do lose a contributor who
	was able to absorb time and effort of unfriendly contributors, and who
	did patricipate in votes. additionally Skapperod would gain credibility
	as "victim" and productive member of Wiki community. I agree that Xx236
	is completely clueless as to avoiding personal attacks, but still I
	think a word or two of warning to him to stop it might avoid a ban. If
	he continues-well it's sad, but like Hanzo some people are unable to
	exploit Wiki doublespeak. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6927561764785712918==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d99ecc71804d0473151604

--0016e6d99ecc71804d0473151604
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

However Piotrus, this means we do lose a contributor who was able to absorb
time and effort of unfriendly contributors, and who did patricipate in
votes. additionally Skapperod would gain credibility as "victim" and
productive member of Wiki community. I agree that Xx236 is completely
clueless as to avoiding personal attacks, but still I think a word or two of
warning to him to stop it might avoid a ban. If he continues-well it's sad,
but like Hanzo some people are unable to exploit Wiki doublespeak.

2009/9/8 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>

> Jack wrote:
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Xx236
> > What is our position as far as backing him up? He was reported bu S. who
> > in the past got in trouble himself for filing ungrounded complaints.
>
> Never liked him...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xx236#Notice_of_editing_restrictions
>
> Plus he so rarely edits articles, he is almost like a Polish Dr. Dan -
> all talk, little substance. That said, Dr. Dan is much more hate filled
> and so on... but to be honest, I don't feel the need to go out of my way
> to defend Xx, and a major factor is that I cannot recall a single
> helpful content creation he did (at best he makes some minor edits and
> complains a lot on talk).
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--0016e6d99ecc71804d0473151604
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

However Piotrus, this means we do lose a contributor who was able to absorb=
 time and effort of unfriendly contributors, and who did patricipate in vot=
es. additionally Skapperod would gain credibility as &quot;victim&quot; and=
 productive member of Wiki community. I agree that Xx236 is completely clue=
less as to avoiding personal attacks, but still I think a word or two of wa=
rning to him to stop it might avoid a ban. If he continues-well it&#39;s sa=
d, but like Hanzo some people are unable to exploit Wiki doublespeak.<br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/9/8 Piotr Konieczny <span dir=3D"ltr">&=
lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; paddi=
ng-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">Jack wrote:<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests=
/Enforcement#Xx236" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedi=
a:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Xx236</a><br>
&gt; What is our position as far as backing him up? He was reported bu S. w=
ho<br>
&gt; in the past got in trouble himself for filing ungrounded complaints.<b=
r>
<br>
</div></div>Never liked him...<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xx236#Notice_of_editing_r=
estrictions" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xx236=
#Notice_of_editing_restrictions</a><br>
<br>
Plus he so rarely edits articles, he is almost like a Polish Dr. Dan -<br>
all talk, little substance. That said, Dr. Dan is much more hate filled<br>
and so on... but to be honest, I don&#39;t feel the need to go out of my wa=
y<br>
to defend Xx, and a major factor is that I cannot recall a single<br>
helpful content creation he did (at best he makes some minor edits and<br>
complains a lot on talk).<br>
<br>
--<br>
Piotr Konieczny<br>
<br>
&quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=
<br>
theory.&quot;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>

--0016e6d99ecc71804d0473151604--


--===============6927561764785712918==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6927561764785712918==--


