X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Aug 18 01:24:50 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 864762.81534.bm@omp407.mail.sp1.yahoo.com
Message-ID: <638963.58286.qm@web45113.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: PmkYvbEVM1luV9_Biynh1jWTjDuwhiyx2tOq4sEiRNToIRQSYM5uMy7utlZeBbbKvB1sh.jz07Rf8YG2YDh_6zt872pUTSh5jDuXFQlbc55h4daDM80uuCFyWspwSnROVQNr58r4U3Haj1eOQkwAJJ32xdbMAhv3QEy8vsoTY_Jw9iJt_qoP0MtBmighd2NeqHu1_1hU5wu7K4bWdjwR5gOshxO357aZjJ05.CrFnUuU.fomPMKByeAr2U0ZmFozBteEYLxlZ3lZDOYjCKJtQqsR0UF7.0xGbh4nsXo21mpJKY15HGMEqE_mTNLBcHT7XiBCK2Z2mDGJ
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/6.1.2 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0908171440y61ab752fh78770ec33b8dc3ed@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Oh boy..Radek,
	you guys are experts on these things...I
	don't know.....maybe wait for the 4th revert to have unquestionable
	case...? --- On Mon, 8/17/09, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
	From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> Subject: [WPM] PasswordUsername
	fence hugging To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
	Date: Monday, August 17, 2009, 1:40 PM [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] PasswordUsername fence hugging
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1274948816944566260=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Oh boy..Radek, you guys are experts on these things...I
	don't know.....maybe wait for the 4th revert to have unquestionable
	case...? --- On Mon, 8/17/09, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
	From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> Subject: [WPM] PasswordUsername
	fence hugging To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net> Date:
	Monday, August 17, 2009, 1:40 PM [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1274948816944566260==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-335294743-1250551486=:58286"

--0-335294743-1250551486=:58286
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Oh boy..Radek, you guys are experts on these things...I don't know.....mayb=
e wait for the 4th revert to have unquestionable case...?

--- On Mon, 8/17/09, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:


From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
Subject: [WPM] PasswordUsername fence hugging
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Monday, August 17, 2009, 1:40 PM


So PU has made exactly three reverts in 24 hours in at least three differen=
t articles
Collaboration with Axis powers during WWII
Anti-Russian sentiment
Nochnoy Dozor (group)

there might be others. The fact is that he hasn't broken 3RR on any of them=
.. However,=A0 since he's doing this on a group of related article and fence=
-hugging in each case clearly indicates that he's edit warring, so this may=
 be enough for a report.

I think most of us are ok in terms of reverts on these pages, though probab=
ly the standard accusations of 'tag-teaming' will be made.

What do others think? Enough? Or too risky?

We could also throw in some of the "POINT" edits he's been making recently.

Radek



2009/8/17 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>

Hi,


some two years ago, Times Online has published an article, sourced apparent=
ly mostly to Ion Mihai Pacepa of what's probably Securitate, claiming that =
KGB deliberately and counterfactually attempted to paint Pius XII as antise=
mitic and pro-Hitler. =A0It's online at <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/n=
ews/world/europe/article1400670.ece>.


Comments? =A0In particular, how much credibility should be reasonably ascri=
bed to Mr. Pacepa?

--=20
Andres Soolo

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks



-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
=0A=0A=0A      
--0-335294743-1250551486=:58286
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;">Oh boy..Radek, you guys are experts on these =
things...I don't know.....maybe wait for the 4th revert to have unquestiona=
ble case...?<BR><BR>--- On <B>Mon, 8/17/09, radek szulga <I>&lt;rsszulga@gm=
ail.com&gt;</I></B> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(=
16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: radek szulga &lt;rsszulga@gmail.com&gt;<BR>=
Subject: [WPM] PasswordUsername fence hugging<BR>To: "Wikipedia statistics"=
 &lt;folks@wikipedometer.net&gt;<BR>Date: Monday, August 17, 2009, 1:40 PM<=
BR><BR>
<DIV id=3Dyiv2042124139>So PU has made exactly three reverts in 24 hours in=
 at least three different articles<BR>Collaboration with Axis powers during=
 WWII<BR>Anti-Russian sentiment<BR>Nochnoy Dozor (group)<BR><BR>there might=
 be others. The fact is that he hasn't broken 3RR on any of them. However,&=
nbsp; since he's doing this on a group of related article and fence-hugging=
 in each case clearly indicates that he's edit warring, so this may be enou=
gh for a report.<BR><BR>I think most of us are ok in terms of reverts on th=
ese pages, though probably the standard accusations of 'tag-teaming' will b=
e made.<BR><BR>What do others think? Enough? Or too risky?<BR><BR>We could =
also throw in some of the "POINT" edits he's been making recently.<BR><BR>R=
adek<BR><BR><BR>
<DIV class=3Dgmail_quote>2009/8/17 Digwuren <SPAN dir=3Dltr>&lt;<A href=3D"=
http://us.mc451.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=3Ddigwuren@gmail.com" target=
=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow ymailto=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gma=
il.com</A>&gt;</SPAN><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dgmail_quote style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt=
 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">Hi,
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>some two years ago, Times Online has published an article, sourced app=
arently mostly to Ion Mihai Pacepa of what's probably Securitate, claiming =
that KGB deliberately and counterfactually attempted to paint Pius XII as a=
ntisemitic and pro-Hitler. &nbsp;It's online at &lt;<A href=3D"http://www.t=
imesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article1400670.ece" target=3D_blank =
rel=3Dnofollow>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article14=
00670.ece</A>&gt;.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Comments? &nbsp;In particular, how much credibility should be reasonab=
ly ascribed to Mr. Pacepa?<BR clear=3Dall><BR>-- <BR>Andres Soolo<BR></DIV>=
<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Wikipedia statistics=
 discussion list<BR><A href=3D"http://us.mc451.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=
=3Dfolks@wikipedometer.net" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow ymailto=3D"mailt=
o:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</A><BR><A href=3D"http:/=
/wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=3D_blank rel=3Dno=
follow>http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</A><BR><BR><=
/BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV><BR>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----<BR><BR>
<DIV class=3DplainMail>_______________________________________________<BR>W=
ikipedia statistics discussion list<BR><A href=3D"http://us.mc451.mail.yaho=
o.com/mc/compose?to=3Dfolks@wikipedometer.net" ymailto=3D"mailto:folks@wiki=
pedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</A><BR><A href=3D"http://wikipedomet=
er.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=3D_blank>http://wikipedometer=
..net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></t=
able><br>=0A=0A      
--0-335294743-1250551486=:58286--



--===============1274948816944566260==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1274948816944566260==--



