X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Apr  2 10:38:50 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:38:35 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0904020138t79a850ddg15ad06fe1eddde03@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 1.0
X-Spam_score_int: 10
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi, I reported the anonymous address on [[Johan
	Bäckman]] to AN/I. With luck, he'll be blocked for a while for either
	editwarring, incivility, or trolling. Considering that administrators
	tend to hate controversy, please do not needlessly add to the drama in
	this thread -- our best chance is if the thread will consist of a brief
	report followed by an administrator confirming that the report was valid
	and that a block has been issued, then closing the thread. In such
	cases, the anonymous blocks are often long-term (upwards of 3 months).
	The daytime is (yet) in our favour, too. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] WP:AN/I
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9082778337425855319=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.8
X-Spam_score_int: 28
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi, I reported the anonymous address on [[Johan
	Bäckman]] to AN/I. With luck, he'll be blocked for a while for either
	editwarring, incivility, or trolling. Considering that administrators
	tend to hate controversy, please do not needlessly add to the drama in
	this thread -- our best chance is if the thread will consist of a brief
	report followed by an administrator confirming that the report was valid
	and that a block has been issued, then closing the thread. In such
	cases, the anonymous blocks are often long-term (upwards of 3 months).
	The daytime is (yet) in our favour, too. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.0 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS          Subject is all capitals
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4999]
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-1.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============9082778337425855319==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de00339b934804668e5b77

--0016e6de00339b934804668e5b77
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,
I reported the anonymous address on [[Johan B=C3=A4ckman]] to AN/I.  With l=
uck,
he'll be blocked for a while for either editwarring, incivility, or
trolling.

Considering that administrators tend to hate controversy, please do not
needlessly add to the drama in this thread -- our best chance is if the
thread will consist of a brief report followed by an administrator
confirming that the report was valid and that a block has been issued, then
closing the thread.  In such cases, the anonymous blocks are often long-ter=
m
(upwards of 3 months).  The daytime is (yet) in our favour, too.

In the bad news department, it's clear that the hole left in the Cartel by
Irpen's departure is closing up, and Russavia will be his replacement.  The
time for a more decisive direct confrontation is, alas, getting nearer.

Alex Bakharev appears to dislike the idea of active Cartel participation,
but feels a need to co=C3=B6perate with it in harsh situations.  This might=
 be
one of the weakest connections in the Cartel's battle formation that we
could exploit.  I'm not yet sure how, but given the choice between Alex and
Russavia, I'd rather side with Alex.  Are there ways we could improve
relations with him?

--=20
Andres Soolo

--0016e6de00339b934804668e5b77
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,<div><br></div><div>I reported the anonymous address on [[Johan B=C3=A4c=
kman]] to AN/I. =C2=A0With luck, he&#39;ll be blocked for a while for eithe=
r editwarring,=C2=A0incivility, or trolling.</div><div><br></div><div>Consi=
dering that administrators tend to hate controversy, please do not needless=
ly add to the drama in this thread -- our best chance is if the thread will=
 consist of a brief report followed by an administrator confirming that the=
 report was valid and that a block has been issued, then closing the thread=
. =C2=A0In such cases, the anonymous blocks are often long-term (upwards of=
 3 months). =C2=A0The daytime is (yet) in our favour, too.</div>
<div><br></div><div>In the bad news department, it&#39;s clear that the hol=
e left in the Cartel by Irpen&#39;s departure is closing up, and Russavia w=
ill be his replacement. =C2=A0The time for a more decisive direct confronta=
tion is, alas, getting nearer.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Alex Bakharev appears to dislike the idea of active Car=
tel participation, but feels a need to co=C3=B6perate with it in harsh situ=
ations. =C2=A0This might be one of the weakest connections in the Cartel&#3=
9;s battle formation that we could exploit. =C2=A0I&#39;m not yet sure how,=
 but given the choice between Alex and Russavia, I&#39;d rather side with A=
lex. =C2=A0Are there ways we could improve relations with him?</div>
<div><br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
</div>

--0016e6de00339b934804668e5b77--


--===============9082778337425855319==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============9082778337425855319==--


