X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jun 20 05:04:12 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c59.4d89a497.376dab35@aol.com>
References: <c59.4d89a497.376dab35@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:03:58 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880906192003u279f99c6kaf86b80b73b8dd29@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  No worries, the combative crankiness can come later if
	the case is accepted :)) It looks like Kirill has rejected the case....
	On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:02 PM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote: > In a
	message dated 6/19/2009 10:52:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >
	martint20@gmail.com writes: > > Your first entry on the ArbCom page is
	excellent, but you might want > to refactor your two subsequent entries,
	as it reads a bit combative, > particularly the clerk's question about
	naming, and "Arbcom > frustration". It is only Jehochmen expressing
	frustration, the issue > with him seems to be timorousness in applying
	discretionary sanctions > (has he ever) and trying to offload back to
	ArbCom, which begs the > question if he is so timorous, why is he doing
	AE duty. > > Thanks for that, have removed my combative crankiness. >
	/Peters > > Dell Inspiron 15: Now starting at $349 > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] It isn't over.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  No worries, the combative crankiness can come later if
	the case is accepted :)) It looks like Kirill has rejected the case....
	On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:02 PM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote: > In a
	message dated 6/19/2009 10:52:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >
	martint20@gmail.com writes: > > Your first entry on the ArbCom page is
	excellent, but you might want > to refactor your two subsequent entries,
	as it reads a bit combative, > particularly the clerk's question about
	naming, and "Arbcom > frustration". It is only Jehochmen expressing
	frustration, the issue > with him seems to be timorousness in applying
	discretionary sanctions > (has he ever) and trying to offload back to
	ArbCom, which begs the > question if he is so timorous, why is he doing
	AE duty. > > Thanks for that, have removed my combative crankiness. >
	/Peters > > Dell Inspiron 15: Now starting at $349 > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

No worries, the combative crankiness can come later if the case is accepted :))

It looks like Kirill has rejected the case....

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:02 PM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
> In a message dated 6/19/2009 10:52:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> martint20@gmail.com writes:
>
> Your first entry on the ArbCom page is excellent, but you might want
> to refactor your two subsequent entries, as it reads a bit combative,
> particularly the clerk's question about naming, and "Arbcom
> frustration". It is only Jehochmen expressing frustration, the issue
> with him seems to be timorousness in applying discretionary sanctions
> (has he ever) and trying to offload back to ArbCom, which begs the
> question if he is so timorous, why is he doing AE duty.
>
> Thanks for that, have removed my combative crankiness.
> /Peters
> ________________________________
> Dell Inspiron 15: Now starting at $349
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

