X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jul  6 18:10:51 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A4FBA38.10401@post.pl>
References: <4A4FBA38.10401@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:10:27 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0907060910h5ac839a2oacaf2da4cd222615@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi, Interesting proposal but well, definetely not in a
	month. That's just a too short time, and frankly once I get some time
	free I would rather write something for you guys to post in article.
	Arbcoms and the like just use so much time that could be spent
	elsewhere. There a couple of articles I want to improve or write
	first... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appealing Molobo's block to ArbCom
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi, Interesting proposal but well, definetely not in a
	month. That's just a too short time, and frankly once I get some time
	free I would rather write something for you guys to post in article.
	Arbcoms and the like just use so much time that could be spent
	elsewhere. There a couple of articles I want to improve or write
	first... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Hi,

Interesting proposal but well, definetely not in a month. That's just
a too short time, and frankly once I get some time free I would rather
write something for you guys to post in article. Arbcoms and the like
just use so much time that could be spent elsewhere. There a couple of
articles I want to improve or write first...

2009/7/4 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> Something to consider in a month or so: Molobo could appeal his block to
> ArbCom. Arguments:
> * apologize for using a sock to avoid 1RR restriction, point out that
> violations were infrequent and your primary motivation was to retire old
> account, not avoid blocks
> * acknowledge that reverting is your biggest problem and promise to
> adhere to 1RR for a year if unbanned
> * promise not to sock again, of course
> * ask for a mentor
> * point out that you are a content creator and civil discutant at talk,
> and have a lot of materials to add which you've accumulated over the few
> months of your ban (you can attach a doc with some stuff, just to show
> how you'd benefit the project by quantity)
>
> Bottom line, appeal to ArbCom cannot hurt you, and may result in unbanning.
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

