X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Feb  5 19:49:03 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <498B34BB.8030309@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:49:31 -0500
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080829 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.2
X-Spam_score_int: -21
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  In an AE thread, Deacon is (as usual) defending a user
	(M.K.) who is harassing Polish editors, and criticizing me. A few
	comments would be appreciated, to ensure that he doesn't manage to frame
	this to his liking (i.e. that his opinion is not the only one there,
	which his tag team could later claim, as they've done in the past,
	represented a consensus):
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration.2FEastern_European_disputes
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-2.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM]  An AE thread involving me
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.2
X-Spam_score_int: -21
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  In an AE thread, Deacon is (as usual) defending a user
	(M.K.) who is harassing Polish editors, and criticizing me. A few
	comments would be appreciated, to ensure that he doesn't manage to frame
	this to his liking (i.e. that his opinion is not the only one there,
	which his tag team could later claim, as they've done in the past,
	represented a consensus):
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration.2FEastern_European_disputes
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

In an AE thread, Deacon is (as usual) defending a user (M.K.) who is 
harassing Polish editors, and criticizing me. A few comments would be 
appreciated, to ensure that he doesn't manage to frame this to his 
liking (i.e. that his opinion is not the only one there, which his tag 
team could later claim, as they've done in the past, represented a 
consensus):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration.2FEastern_European_disputes

Btw, MK is the editor who has launched (together with his friend Ghirla) 
RfC against me and Halibutt, and the first arbcom against me (that's 
just citing some of his most notable attempts to harass me and other 
Polish editors).

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

