X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 02:09:58 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906201606p57210825v570077cda8088b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cdb.526d35e2.376ec2f8@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906201606p57210825v570077cda8088b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:09:47 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906201709s7e976be2l4c8e2333d1d7ead0@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 02:06, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > No, please. Things are becoming
	complicated. The disagreement of admins (S > who closed the case and J
	who reopened the case and used sanctions) is a > reason for starting
	the
	Arbom case that we all commented about (see comment > by FloNight in
	Arbcom case). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Well, there goes another weekend, the latest AE
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0711305436360488709=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 02:06, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > No, please. Things are becoming
	complicated. The disagreement of admins (S > who closed the case and J
	who reopened the case and used sanctions) is a > reason for starting the
	Arbom case that we all commented about (see comment > by FloNight in
	Arbcom case). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0711305436360488709==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b3fd5a0ff6046cd09321

--001636c5b3fd5a0ff6046cd09321
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 02:06, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:

> No, please. Things are becoming complicated. The disagreement of admins (S
> who closed the case and J who reopened the case and used sanctions) is a
> reason for starting the  Arbom case that we all commented about (see comment
> by FloNight in Arbcom case).


Can we argue that Jehochman only changed his mind to deliberately create a
disagreement of administrators after FloNight pointed out that there wasn't
one?

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5b3fd5a0ff6046cd09321
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 02:06, Andrei Dombay <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com">wikibiophys@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
No, please. Things are becoming complicated. The disagreement of admins (S =
who closed the case and J who reopened the case and used sanctions) is a re=
ason for starting the=C2=A0 Arbom case that we all commented about (see com=
ment by FloNight in Arbcom case).</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Can we argue that Jehochman only changed his mind to de=
liberately create a disagreement of administrators after FloNight pointed o=
ut that there wasn&#39;t one?</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo=
<br>


--001636c5b3fd5a0ff6046cd09321--


--===============0711305436360488709==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0711305436360488709==--


