X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 23 18:35:47 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:35:40 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0906230935v3ba25d0epb3e6994120e37cb5@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Indeed this is the case. Let me share my personal
	experience-edit warring seems only important in the heat of the moment.
	Once you look from a distance, it doesn't change articles much. What
	really matters-and what certain editors realise(Stor
	Stark7,Skapperod,Irpen) are extensive, lenghty articles with lots of
	sources. It is a difficult tactic-you need time and effort before
	making
	article. Reverting somebody is easy. Writing an article is much more
	work-intense effort. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] "We each have different talents which are wasted by simple
	edit warring."
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Indeed this is the case. Let me share my personal
	experience-edit warring seems only important in the heat of the moment.
	Once you look from a distance, it doesn't change articles much. What
	really matters-and what certain editors realise(Stor
	Stark7,Skapperod,Irpen) are extensive, lenghty articles with lots of
	sources. It is a difficult tactic-you need time and effort before making
	article. Reverting somebody is easy. Writing an article is much more
	work-intense effort. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Indeed this is the case. Let me share my personal experience-edit
warring seems only important in the heat of the moment. Once you look
from a distance, it doesn't change articles much. What really
matters-and what certain editors realise(Stor Stark7,Skapperod,Irpen)
are extensive, lenghty articles with lots of sources.
It is a difficult tactic-you need time and effort before making
article. Reverting somebody is easy. Writing an article is much more
work-intense effort.

As others noted, each of us has interests and knowledge in his
favourite fields. We should write articles, then protect them for each
other.
I am currently making a task list of things to do, complete with
sources I have for each article. I will send it over for you during
the weekend so that you might comment and decide what in your view is
interesting and what is important, perhaps advice. I hope this will
allow us to create more content-driven activity. I suggest the same
from you, while I currently focus on German-topics, my knowledge of
Soviet history in certain areas is also extensive and I am also able
to provide many sources.

Cheers !

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

