X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Apr 28 22:11:46 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <49F7613B.6070307@post.pl>
References: <226476.72978.qm@web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<c3b2b3db0904271114y495f9b0dl1328b86a07723d9f@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0904271358r8c08b23ifc2991dde9e442c6@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0904271410w78ed56bbh730525025f0dccd4@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0904272130n43965cf2m9305908aaf6ad130@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880904272214n1e851002v67f3b5063d94b95b@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0904272221n218358d2h65c04bd5570cbec2@mail.gmail.com>
	<49F7613B.6070307@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:11:36 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0904281311p370761d1r8146dc6226236218@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 23:04, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Infamous doesn't mean good. I'd personally
	bet
	that the fact that it was > discovered means that this Chinese
	operation
	> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GhostNet) was probably amateurish. I >
	really find it hard to believe that Chinese would be more advanced then
	> the West. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2812918880528493513=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.4
X-Spam_score_int: 14
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 23:04, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Infamous doesn't mean good. I'd personally bet
	that the fact that it was > discovered means that this Chinese operation
	> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GhostNet) was probably amateurish. I >
	really find it hard to believe that Chinese would be more advanced then
	> the West. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.7 BAYES_20               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20%
	[score: 0.1761]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2812918880528493513==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d647b1eb27750468a311d3

--0016e6d647b1eb27750468a311d3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 23:04, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> Infamous doesn't mean good. I'd personally bet that the fact that it was
> discovered means that this Chinese operation
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GhostNet) was probably amateurish. I
> really find it hard to believe that Chinese would be more advanced then
> the West.


They need not be more advanced.  A lot of Western computer systems have
silly holes in them.  They only need to have lot of time to systematically
poke through potential holes, and they're pretty much guaranteed to find
some.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6d647b1eb27750468a311d3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 23:04, Piotr Konieczny <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">Infamous doesn&#39;t mean good. I&#39;d personally bet th=
at the fact that it was<br></div>
discovered means that this Chinese operation<br>
(<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GhostNet" target=3D"_blank">http:/=
/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GhostNet</a>) was probably amateurish. I<br>
really find it hard to believe that Chinese would be more advanced then<br>
the West.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>They need not be more advanced. =
=C2=A0A lot of Western computer systems have silly holes in them. =C2=A0The=
y only need to have lot of time to systematically poke through potential ho=
les, and they&#39;re pretty much guaranteed to find some.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e6d647b1eb27750468a311d3--


--===============2812918880528493513==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2812918880528493513==--


