X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 22:58:48 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211357t6b784222rbfbdcea08f73c4e3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c39.57b57f3e.376ee266@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906202028s9291ce7webaed4493229aedb@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70906210719u3ac8b9b3l9f28443cce3dabe2@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3E7FEE.8070601@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211212p10320e3cwbfc9bb3780e2a5c3@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211336h47a4185eg660716b7591628f3@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211357t6b784222rbfbdcea08f73c4e3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:58:32 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906211358j586b6862gcb831cc0b9f1d6d6@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 23:57, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > other* administrator, PhilKnight, did the
	block, not William M. Connolley > -- it's rather > I meant to say "undid
	the block". Sorry for the confusion. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Well, there goes another weekend, the latest AE
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0403532209034410726=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 23:57, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > other* administrator, PhilKnight, did the
	block, not William M. Connolley > -- it's rather > I meant to say "undid
	the block". Sorry for the confusion. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0403532209034410726==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5bbd1385a26046ce205be

--001636c5bbd1385a26046ce205be
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 23:57, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> other* administrator, PhilKnight, did the block, not William M. Connolley
> -- it's rather
>

I meant to say "undid the block".  Sorry for the confusion.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5bbd1385a26046ce205be
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 23:57, Digwuren <span di=
r=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&=
gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 =
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">other* administrator, PhilKnig=
ht, did the block, not William M. Connolley -- it&#39;s rather</div></div><=
/blockquote><div><br></div><div>I meant to say &quot;undid the block&quot;.=
 =C2=A0Sorry for the confusion.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5bbd1385a26046ce205be--


--===============0403532209034410726==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0403532209034410726==--


