X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 12 22:28:09 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906120243w435eb442p604279561d019f1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <292063.51782.qm@web32802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<f826636f0906111553l77c2fa8i4498ee714154408b@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906120025q5ffaecacvb348ec9533a8ef81@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0906120204y1fba64bagc900122aabaad9c1@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906120243w435eb442p604279561d019f1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:27:57 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906121327hd9c26d2u5250f2ec63299497@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:43, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > I wouldn't be so sure. PasswordUsername's
	clumsy attempts to connect these >>>> affairs will probably be useful
	at
	a future date to demonstrate his >>>> battleground mentality. >>>> >>>
	>> Short-term, he did. >> > > He certainly made an attempt, but I don't
	see anything that he gained. He > lost a chance to attack Sander,
	however, which is a good thing. > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] blocked
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1021640142182719521=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:43, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > I wouldn't be so sure. PasswordUsername's
	clumsy attempts to connect these >>>> affairs will probably be useful at
	a future date to demonstrate his >>>> battleground mentality. >>>> >>>
	>> Short-term, he did. >> > > He certainly made an attempt, but I don't
	see anything that he gained. He > lost a chance to attack Sander,
	however, which is a good thing. > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1021640142182719521==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7786c47a0cf046c2c8b11

--001485f7786c47a0cf046c2c8b11
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:43, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> I wouldn't be so sure.  PasswordUsername's clumsy attempts to connect these
>>>> affairs will probably be useful at a future date to demonstrate his
>>>> battleground mentality.
>>>>
>>>
>> Short-term, he did.
>>
>
> He certainly made an attempt, but I don't see anything that he gained.  He
> lost a chance to attack Sander, however, which is a good thing.
>

It's probably too early to assess it; he might have gained something for the
upcoming Sandstein investigation.  Let's wait until Sandstein completes, and
assess again.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001485f7786c47a0cf046c2c8b11
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:43, Digwuren <span di=
r=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&=
gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 =
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quo=
te" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"=
><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D=
"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>I would=
n&#39;t be so sure. =C2=A0PasswordUsername&#39;s clumsy attempts to connect=
 these affairs will probably be useful at a future date to demonstrate his =
battleground mentality.<br>
</div></blockquote></div>

<div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Short-term, he did.=
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>He certainly made an att=
empt, but I don&#39;t see anything that he gained. =C2=A0He lost a chance t=
o attack Sander, however, which is a good thing.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It&#39;s probably too early to asses=
s it; he might have gained something for the upcoming Sandstein investigati=
on. =C2=A0Let&#39;s wait until Sandstein completes, and assess again.</div>=
<div>
<br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001485f7786c47a0cf046c2c8b11--


--===============1021640142182719521==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1021640142182719521==--


