X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jun 27 07:45:02 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c41.5ed2ecea.3776b0f7@aol.com>
References: <c41.5ed2ecea.3776b0f7@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:44:45 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880906262244j46833f86ib661e008ef7d5d08@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: What are the odds they will find evidence in the
	Soviet
	archives pinning the blame on Poland for the M-R pact.... On Sat, Jun
	27, 2009 at 9:17 AM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote: > In a message dated
	6/26/2009 4:37:15 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > digwuren@gmail.com
	writes: > > According to <http://www.epl.ee/artikkel/472080>, the
	Historic Truth > Commission has promised surprising revelations by
	August 23 in form of > studies based on Soviet archive documents
	regarding the lead-up to and the > aftermath of the Molotov-Ribbentrop
	Pact. 2009 is the Pact's 70th > anniversary and the first year the
	anniversary will (theoretically) be > commemorated EU-wide after the
	Europarliament's vote in April, so it's going > to catch quite a bit of
	attention. > > In the regime where "history serves politics" why is it
	that everyone rushes > to accept Soviet archives as factual? Once a
	liar, always a liar. Has anyone > actually done a study of Soviet
	archives and their reliability of > information? /Peters > > Make your
	summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the grill. > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Historic Truth Commission preparing for MRP-70
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  What are the odds they will find evidence in the Soviet
	archives pinning the blame on Poland for the M-R pact.... On Sat, Jun
	27, 2009 at 9:17 AM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote: > In a message dated
	6/26/2009 4:37:15 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > digwuren@gmail.com
	writes: > > According to <http://www.epl.ee/artikkel/472080>, the
	Historic Truth > Commission has promised surprising revelations by
	August 23 in form of > studies based on Soviet archive documents
	regarding the lead-up to and the > aftermath of the Molotov-Ribbentrop
	Pact. 2009 is the Pact's 70th > anniversary and the first year the
	anniversary will (theoretically) be > commemorated EU-wide after the
	Europarliament's vote in April, so it's going > to catch quite a bit of
	attention. > > In the regime where "history serves politics" why is it
	that everyone rushes > to accept Soviet archives as factual? Once a
	liar, always a liar. Has anyone > actually done a study of Soviet
	archives and their reliability of > information? /Peters > > Make your
	summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the grill. > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

What are the odds they will find evidence in the Soviet archives
pinning the blame on Poland for the M-R pact....

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 9:17 AM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
> In a message dated 6/26/2009 4:37:15 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> digwuren@gmail.com writes:
>
> According to <http://www.epl.ee/artikkel/472080>, the Historic Truth
> Commission has promised surprising revelations by August 23 in form of
> studies based on Soviet archive documents regarding the lead-up to and the
> aftermath of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. =A02009 is the Pact's 70th
> anniversary and the first year the anniversary will (theoretically) be
> commemorated EU-wide after the Europarliament's vote in April, so it's go=
ing
> to catch quite a bit of attention.
>
> In the regime where "history serves politics" why is it that everyone rus=
hes
> to accept Soviet archives as factual? Once a liar, always=A0a liar. Has a=
nyone
> actually done a study of Soviet archives and their reliability of
> information? /Peters
> ________________________________
> Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the grill.
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

