X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jul  1 04:02:36 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A4AC42E.9080204@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:04:30 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <25890ca0906281732s3836a51i757b5568dd328d63@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0906290607n3820f96ledc8b75892a474f3@mail.gmail.com>	<4A490AA0.4010107@post.pl>	<25890ca0906291156y47f38354y606b28ff9640c876@mail.gmail.com>	<c3b2b3db0906291200w4701a20es9162d3a13509848b@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0906291205q41ca8f46jb5bdeeaf0e22cf43@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0906300826w3d2e7055k36965f3a3ed4729e@mail.gmail.com>	<4A4A8840.8040803@post.pl>	<25890ca0906301452q70e09962v271a9b21198f06ad@mail.gmail.com>	<c3b2b3db0906301558l3dd6f4b9p3f901958325e637a@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906301642qa1b9a47ncd8a4c76dfb74e1a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906301642qa1b9a47ncd8a4c76dfb74e1a@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: radek szulga wrote: > I think I'm ok with Sandstein.
	Thatcher... > And yes the Skapperod crap comes at a bad time. I am
	still
	writing > this AE appeal up and probably won't make it for at least a
	day or > two. But I need to know how this is going to play out. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appeal at AE (was: Let's give Thatcher some
	breathing	space)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > I think I'm ok with Sandstein.
	Thatcher... > And yes the Skapperod crap comes at a bad time. I am still
	writing > this AE appeal up and probably won't make it for at least a
	day or > two. But I need to know how this is going to play out. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

radek szulga wrote:
> I think I'm ok with Sandstein. Thatcher...
> And yes the Skapperod crap comes at a bad time. I am still writing
> this AE appeal up and probably won't make it for at least a day or
> two. But I need to know how this is going to play out.


Thathcher... has just dug out his own grave (or at least waved a shovel):
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=299606947&oldid=299594987
"At RFAR/Digwuren, users must be notified of the existence of the case 
and the possibility of further sanctions, with the notification logged, 
prior to imposing any sanctions."
Yet as Durova pointed out, Radek was not warned before he was 
sanctioned. I'd strongly recommend Radek cite this diff when he goes to 
appear at AE.

On the other hand, please note that he tends to follow the principle of 
"warn everyone who is even a little bit associated with others". I would 
urge Jacurek to ask why his name was brought up there?

I strongly encourage adopting voluntary 1RR for a while. Let's try to 
use our numbers to deal with them, if they do more than 1RR a day they 
should become objects of Thatcher affection :)

I am almost thinking that considering his irrational attitude 
(sanctioning editors who are reverting like 0.25 a day on a given 
article) it may be a good idea to create SPS to take care of reverting. 
As long as the socks are not identifiable, and if they do only a few 
reverts before being retired, they should not be easy to identify with 
existing editors... I hate to suggest such an option, but if he is going 
to sanction people for a few related reverts over a period of a month, 
we have to consider such actions.

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

