X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jul 14 21:04:18 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0907140810l66813775v1c11eabab9dcb7e2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <bc2.4a4db562.378d5671@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907140744q1f74b14cv7b6b84b296b3f6e8@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907140810l66813775v1c11eabab9dcb7e2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:04:04 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70907141204r1b7d3849nd6d7e9bd5438434a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  i agree that Siebert is a rather difficult case,
	exactly
	due to his professional approach. He is constantly POV-pushing that
	e.g.
	MRP was some inevitable step for ''buying time in order to build
	defences'' etc. - a completely nonsensical POV, but alas supported by
	many Western academics. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] question
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  i agree that Siebert is a rather difficult case, exactly
	due to his professional approach. He is constantly POV-pushing that e.g.
	MRP was some inevitable step for ''buying time in order to build
	defences'' etc. - a completely nonsensical POV, but alas supported by
	many Western academics. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

i agree that Siebert is a rather difficult case, exactly due to his
professional approach. He is constantly POV-pushing that e.g. MRP was
some inevitable step for ''buying time in order to build defences''
etc. - a completely nonsensical POV, but alas supported by many
Western academics.

M.

On 14/07/2009, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah I agree - and already tried to comment at the RfC. Mosedchurte has done
> some great work and he really knows his stuff (way more than I do at any
> rate). Siebert is another one of those editors that are civil, use talk a
> lot, use sources and completely POV articles - pretty much impossible to get
> rid off and basically just requires some really labor intensive countering.
>
> Radek
>
>
> 2009/7/14 Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
>
>> I had some email exchange with Mosedschurte. There is not much to tell,
>> except he would appreciate some help with Viriditas; and he said he was
>> followed by a number of "strange" editors who know very little but make
>> his
>> life difficult (that's true). I think we know too little to invite him
>> here,
>> but collaboration with him in WP would be beneficial.
>>
>> Paul Siebert is a Russian editor who persistently "NPOV" articles meaning
>> the promotion the Soviet view of history.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:33 PM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  In a message dated 7/12/2009 2:48:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>> piokon@post.pl writes:
>>>
>>> > What do you know about User:Mosedschurte?
>>> > He just helped save two Nazi-Soviet images:
>>>
>>> He writes good (anti-Soviet?) content, didn't have much luck trying to
>>> engage him in discussion. Overall, potential ally?
>>>
>>>  I only recently engaged with Mosedschurte, so far I can say all I've
>>> seen is good work from our perspective and following sources well in
>>> general. He's also had some disagreements with our friend Paul Siebert
>>> (on
>>> which my tendency was to see things from the same perspective
>>> as Mosedschurte). Sibert at least sticks to sources for the most part and
>>> can usually be reasoned with.
>>>
>>> Viriditas (mentioned in another Email) has some serious ownership issues
>>> compounded by a persecution complex compounded by egocentric (self as
>>> target) conspiracy theories.
>>>
>>> /Peters
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Looking for love this summer? Find it now on AOL
>>> Personals<http://personals.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntuslove00000003>
>>> .
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

