X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jun 27 17:49:05 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A463FCE.6080905@post.pl>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:50:38 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <d55.53170ae2.37770722@aol.com>
	<929ed1ec0906262338md164c65u638f7fd47366a022@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906262338md164c65u638f7fd47366a022@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Digwuren wrote: > It's interesting how Thatcher on one
	hand explains that he sanctioned > everybody involved in the Nashi
	classification as anti-fascist, and on > the other hand complains that
	no neutral third party showed up to join > in on the obviousness. Who's
	Radek if not a neutral third party? > Besides, if another neutral third
	party *had* showed up, Thatcher's > "canary theory" would led to his
	restriction, as well. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Let's give Thatcher some breathing space
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > It's interesting how Thatcher on one
	hand explains that he sanctioned > everybody involved in the Nashi
	classification as anti-fascist, and on > the other hand complains that
	no neutral third party showed up to join > in on the obviousness. Who's
	Radek if not a neutral third party? > Besides, if another neutral third
	party *had* showed up, Thatcher's > "canary theory" would led to his
	restriction, as well. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Digwuren wrote:

> It's interesting how Thatcher on one hand explains that he sanctioned 
> everybody involved in the Nashi classification as anti-fascist, and on 
> the other hand complains that no neutral third party showed up to join 
> in on the obviousness.  Who's Radek if not a neutral third party? 
>  Besides, if another neutral third party *had* showed up, Thatcher's 
> "canary theory" would led to his restriction, as well.

A good point; that entire canary idea is a bizarre idiocy. 
Unfortunately, it appears to me that Thathcer has a fatal flow: belief 
is self perfection. He does a lot of good job otherwise, but seems to 
refuse to acknowledge he may make mistakes :(


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

