X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 23 09:08:07 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:07:48 +0300
Message-ID: <4fbe29dd0906230007g300310f3i2ecab5d6ca6ed1dc@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?U2FuZGVyIFPDpGRl?= <sander.sade@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Seems I should have looked a bit more thoroughly at
	the sources about the "controversy" before -
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jaak_Aaviksoo#Controversy_section -
	it
	will be fun to see with what claims does PU come out now. Hopefully he
	will blow his lid and do something drastic again. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] Jaak Aaviksoo
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6269502163776211968=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Seems I should have looked a bit more thoroughly at the
	sources about the "controversy" before -
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jaak_Aaviksoo#Controversy_section - it
	will be fun to see with what claims does PU come out now. Hopefully he
	will blow his lid and do something drastic again. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6269502163776211968==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ee20ef40d49046cfea5e1

--0016364ee20ef40d49046cfea5e1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Seems I should have looked a bit more thoroughly at the sources about the
"controversy" before -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jaak_Aaviksoo#Controversy_section - it
will be fun to see with what claims does PU come out now. Hopefully he will
blow his lid and do something drastic again.

Sander

--0016364ee20ef40d49046cfea5e1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Seems I should have looked a bit more thoroughly at the sources about the &=
quot;controversy&quot; before - <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tal=
k:Jaak_Aaviksoo#Controversy_section">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jaak=
_Aaviksoo#Controversy_section</a> - it will be fun to see with what claims =
does PU come out now. Hopefully he will blow his lid and do something drast=
ic again.<br>
<br>Sander<br>

--0016364ee20ef40d49046cfea5e1--


--===============6269502163776211968==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6269502163776211968==--


