X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 19 16:15:15 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906190619j14cfa570u7a77a29a69336ac4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181257q5ee1749ap4872a277af9b7a6f@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906181304x6fab2980se600cc88f41aaaf8@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181350i5fbd4cc9u41114510a11eab2@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181358tec27236w5a3ad45a11e02432@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190014k624acd6as6a0793df5398e54d@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190412i80309d6kf23d7967fc7b8764@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906190619j14cfa570u7a77a29a69336ac4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:15:00 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906190715w6e35fd30j508a40422aedcbef@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 16:19, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > Not responding means admitting all
	arguments by your opponents. Not > responding was fatal error of Vlad
	Fedorov. You should follow last advice by > Sandstein: (1) responds to
	all claims or diffs that may be misunderstood by > the reviewing
	administrator; (2) if you think the accusers have some valid > points,
	tell how you are going to adapt/behave. I think your text above is > OK
	as a part of your answer. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0542422603345134566=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 16:19, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > Not responding means admitting all
	arguments by your opponents. Not > responding was fatal error of Vlad
	Fedorov. You should follow last advice by > Sandstein: (1) responds to
	all claims or diffs that may be misunderstood by > the reviewing
	administrator; (2) if you think the accusers have some valid > points,
	tell how you are going to adapt/behave. I think your text above is > OK
	as a part of your answer. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0542422603345134566==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5990b6282c9046cb426c5

--001636c5990b6282c9046cb426c5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 16:19, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:

> Not responding means admitting all arguments by your opponents. Not
> responding was fatal error of Vlad Fedorov. You should follow last advice by
> Sandstein: (1) responds to all claims or diffs that may be misunderstood by
> the reviewing administrator; (2) if you think the accusers have some valid
> points, tell how you are going to adapt/behave. I think your text above is
> OK as a part of your answer.


I'll try.  But I also had another silly idea.

How about I'll call for a ban vote on AN/I on myself?  I'd call it a vote of
confidence, and attach today's date to it, in an implicit-yet-obvious bid
that all my possible editing issues up to today are covered by the resulting
vote.  It'll generate a lot of dramu, and hopefully direct it in the right
direction.

There's naturally a risk that the Web Brigades manage to show up in large
numbers.  It'd be interesting to see, if that happens.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5990b6282c9046cb426c5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 16:19, Andrei Dombay <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com">wikibiophys@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Not responding means admitting all arguments by your opponents. Not respond=
ing was fatal error of Vlad Fedorov. You should follow last advice by Sands=
tein: (1) responds to all claims or diffs that may be misunderstood by the =
reviewing administrator; (2) if you think the accusers have some valid poin=
ts, tell how you are going to adapt/behave. I think your text above is OK a=
s a part of your answer.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>I&#39;ll try. =C2=A0But I also had another silly idea.<=
/div><div><br></div><div>How about I&#39;ll call for a ban vote on AN/I on =
myself? =C2=A0I&#39;d call it a vote of confidence, and attach today&#39;s =
date to it, in an implicit-yet-obvious bid that all my possible editing iss=
ues up to today are covered by the resulting vote. =C2=A0It&#39;ll generate=
 a lot of dramu, and hopefully direct it in the right direction.</div>
<div><br></div><div>There&#39;s naturally a risk that the Web Brigades mana=
ge to show up in large numbers. =C2=A0It&#39;d be interesting to see, if th=
at happens.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5990b6282c9046cb426c5--


--===============0542422603345134566==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0542422603345134566==--


