X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul  3 17:12:01 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0907011244l6efbb29wf0ea850c623211cf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0906281732s3836a51i757b5568dd328d63@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906291205q41ca8f46jb5bdeeaf0e22cf43@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906300826w3d2e7055k36965f3a3ed4729e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4A8840.8040803@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906301452q70e09962v271a9b21198f06ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906301558l3dd6f4b9p3f901958325e637a@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906301642qa1b9a47ncd8a4c76dfb74e1a@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4AC42E.9080204@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0906301929o30d77c9bi2b9114bf6be20c3c@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907011244l6efbb29wf0ea850c623211cf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:11:49 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907030811k715772c9w377f24a20922f172@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  "Tag-teams mentioned by T in his official 1RR
	restriction message. Should the idea of collective responsibility ever
	be used by administrators? (several users treayed as one, as Deacon
	said). The tag-team is a controversial concept, which was not supported
	by ArbCom in the last EE case. A group of editors may indeed revert
	someone who fights against consensus. A tag-team?" [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appeal at AE (was: Let's give Thatcher some breathing
	space)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6788152778287160504=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  "Tag-teams mentioned by T in his official 1RR
	restriction message. Should the idea of collective responsibility ever
	be used by administrators? (several users treayed as one, as Deacon
	said). The tag-team is a controversial concept, which was not supported
	by ArbCom in the last EE case. A group of editors may indeed revert
	someone who fights against consensus. A tag-team?" [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6788152778287160504==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cdda254518a046dce9337

--0015175cdda254518a046dce9337
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Tag-teams mentioned by T in his official 1RR restriction message. Should
the idea of collective responsibility ever be used by administrators?
(several users treayed as one, as Deacon said). The tag-team is a
controversial concept, which was not supported by ArbCom in the last EE
case. A group of editors may indeed revert someone who fights against
consensus. A tag-team?"

Here I guess you're referring to the Piotrus case. Is there anything similar
in the Digwuren case?

Radek

--0015175cdda254518a046dce9337
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

&quot;Tag-teams mentioned by T in his official 1RR restriction message.
Should the idea of collective responsibility ever be used by
administrators? (several users treayed as one, as Deacon said). The
tag-team is a controversial concept, which was not supported by ArbCom
in the last EE case. A group of editors may indeed revert someone who
fights against=A0 consensus. A tag-team?&quot;<br><br>Here I guess you&#39;=
re referring to the Piotrus case. Is there anything similar in the Digwuren=
 case?<br><br>Radek<br><br>

--0015175cdda254518a046dce9337--


--===============6788152778287160504==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6788152778287160504==--


