X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 10 12:59:53 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A2F01ED.9040901@post.pl>
References: <929ed1ec0905311301o4ef132d2xa3674fbdd218fe3c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2F01ED.9040901@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:59:36 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906100359n5aa8dec8u43587b618725385f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 03:44, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Digwuren wrote: > > Hypothesis (read:
	wild-assed guess): the DefendEachOther > >
	<http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOther> ethic is a metric
	> > of how established a wikicabal is. Established wikicabals can
	reliably > > and consistently count on such mutual defence, and thus
	their members > > tend to defend themselves on a less frequent basis.
	Newcomers, loners, > > and members less socially cohesive wikicabals can
	not afford to rely on > > such defence and thus, fearing that supportive
	points are not made at > > all, are more inclined to push their own
	points. > > I might have asked this before, but: will you post it in
	your own > userspace as some for of a wiki essay? If not, I'd like to
	adapt it to > my series of wiki essays. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] On wikistablishments
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2319848385829689854=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 03:44, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Digwuren wrote: > > Hypothesis (read:
	wild-assed guess): the DefendEachOther > >
	<http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOther> ethic is a metric
	> > of how established a wikicabal is. Established wikicabals can
	reliably > > and consistently count on such mutual defence, and thus
	their members > > tend to defend themselves on a less frequent basis.
	Newcomers, loners, > > and members less socially cohesive wikicabals can
	not afford to rely on > > such defence and thus, fearing that supportive
	points are not made at > > all, are more inclined to push their own
	points. > > I might have asked this before, but: will you post it in
	your own > userspace as some for of a wiki essay? If not, I'd like to
	adapt it to > my series of wiki essays. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2319848385829689854==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b52e016101046bfc5ff1

--001636c5b52e016101046bfc5ff1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 03:44, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> Digwuren wrote:
> > Hypothesis (read: wild-assed guess): the DefendEachOther
> > <http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOther> ethic is a metric
> > of how established a wikicabal is.  Established wikicabals can reliably
> > and consistently count on such mutual defence, and thus their members
> > tend to defend themselves on a less frequent basis.  Newcomers, loners,
> > and members less socially cohesive wikicabals can not afford to rely on
> > such defence and thus, fearing that supportive points are not made at
> > all, are more inclined to push their own points.
>
> I might have asked this before, but: will you post it in your own
> userspace as some for of a wiki essay? If not, I'd like to adapt it to
> my series of wiki essays.


I attempted to discuss Wikipedia philosophy on Wikipedia before ArbCom
banned me, and I have become rather disillusioned in it.  I might post
something of it on my (long-unused) blog, but no promises.  If you want to
use it as a morsel of wikiwisdom, feel free to do so.

This goes for the powerplay essay, too.  As you recall, for that I can not
even claim any credit, I merely summarised some readily available knowledge.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5b52e016101046bfc5ff1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 03:44, Piotr Konieczny <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">Digwuren wrote:<br>
&gt; Hypothesis (read: wild-assed guess): the DefendEachOther<br>
</div>&gt; &lt;<a href=3D"http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOth=
er" target=3D"_blank">http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOther</=
a>&gt; ethic is a metric<br>
<div class=3D"im">&gt; of how established a wikicabal is. =C2=A0Established=
 wikicabals can reliably<br>
&gt; and consistently count on such mutual defence, and thus their members<=
br>
&gt; tend to defend themselves on a less frequent basis. =C2=A0Newcomers, l=
oners,<br>
&gt; and members less socially cohesive wikicabals can not afford to rely o=
n<br>
&gt; such defence and thus, fearing that supportive points are not made at<=
br>
&gt; all, are more inclined to push their own points.<br>
<br>
</div>I might have asked this before, but: will you post it in your own<br>
userspace as some for of a wiki essay? If not, I&#39;d like to adapt it to<=
br>
my series of wiki essays.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I attempted to di=
scuss Wikipedia philosophy on Wikipedia before ArbCom banned me, and I have=
 become rather disillusioned in it. =C2=A0I might post something of it on m=
y (long-unused) blog, but no promises. =C2=A0If you want to use it as a mor=
sel of wikiwisdom, feel free to do so.</div>
<div><br></div><div>This goes for the powerplay essay, too. =C2=A0As you re=
call, for that I can not even claim any credit, I merely summarised some re=
adily available knowledge.</div><div><br></div><div>--=C2=A0<br></div></div=
>Andres Soolo<br>


--001636c5b52e016101046bfc5ff1--


--===============2319848385829689854==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2319848385829689854==--


