X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul  3 00:04:57 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:04:44 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907021504w7ad77295kf4470437692e4487@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Has anyone had any dealings with the user Yopie?
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yopie I've alerted him once or twice
	when the usual German suspects and/or anon was doing the same thing to
	Czech/Slovak-German articles that they do to Polish-German articles and
	he was pretty good with taking care of it. In some strange connection, 
	Dr. Dan also tried to stir up some Czechs vs. Poles trouble with the
	usual Cieszyn/Zaolzie issue recently and as far as I could tell Yopie
	didn't take the bait (funny how only Soviet and German (Dr. Dan is
	neither but he'll reflexively support anyone who's anti-Polish) editors
	bring it up, while I've never seen a Czech or a Slovak give a shit about
	it). I don't think that at this point he's someone we should invite to
	join us but I think we should watch him as a potential ally (he's
	pretty
	anti-commie too) and maybe try to establish some weak connections with
	him (watch the pages he edits, occasionally throw in a supportive edit, 
	if he gets in a dispute on a talk page support him etc) and see how it
	turns out. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] Outside users, potential allies
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2282235993468626228=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Has anyone had any dealings with the user Yopie?
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yopie I've alerted him once or twice
	when the usual German suspects and/or anon was doing the same thing to
	Czech/Slovak-German articles that they do to Polish-German articles and
	he was pretty good with taking care of it. In some strange connection,
	Dr. Dan also tried to stir up some Czechs vs. Poles trouble with the
	usual Cieszyn/Zaolzie issue recently and as far as I could tell Yopie
	didn't take the bait (funny how only Soviet and German (Dr. Dan is
	neither but he'll reflexively support anyone who's anti-Polish) editors
	bring it up, while I've never seen a Czech or a Slovak give a shit about
	it). I don't think that at this point he's someone we should invite to
	join us but I think we should watch him as a potential ally (he's pretty
	anti-commie too) and maybe try to establish some weak connections with
	him (watch the pages he edits, occasionally throw in a supportive edit,
	if he gets in a dispute on a talk page support him etc) and see how it
	turns out. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2282235993468626228==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cdd26384672046dc03a06

--0015175cdd26384672046dc03a06
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Has anyone had any dealings with the user Yopie?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yopie
I've alerted him once or twice when the usual German suspects and/or anon
was doing the same thing to Czech/Slovak-German articles that they do to
Polish-German articles and he was pretty good with taking care of it. In
some strange connection, Dr. Dan also tried to stir up some Czechs vs. Poles
trouble with the usual Cieszyn/Zaolzie issue recently and as far as I could
tell Yopie didn't take the bait (funny how only Soviet and German (Dr. Dan
is neither but he'll reflexively support anyone who's anti-Polish) editors
bring it up, while I've never seen a Czech or a Slovak give a shit about
it).
I don't think that at this point he's someone we should invite to join us
but I think we should watch him as a potential ally (he's pretty anti-commie
too) and maybe try to establish some weak connections with him (watch the
pages he edits, occasionally throw in a supportive edit, if he gets in a
dispute on a talk page support him etc) and see how it turns out.

Also, just for the record at this time I'd be against asking Loosemark to
join. Support him, yes, and keep talking to him, but I'd hold off on
anything more than that.

Radek

--0015175cdd26384672046dc03a06
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Has anyone had any dealings with the user Yopie? <a href=3D"http://en.wikip=
edia.org/wiki/User:Yopie">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yopie</a><br>I&=
#39;ve alerted him once or twice when the usual German suspects and/or anon=
 was doing the same thing to Czech/Slovak-German articles that they do to P=
olish-German articles and he was pretty good with taking care of it. In som=
e strange connection, Dr. Dan also tried to stir up some Czechs vs. Poles t=
rouble with the usual Cieszyn/Zaolzie issue recently and as far as I could =
tell Yopie didn&#39;t take the bait (funny how only Soviet and German (Dr. =
Dan is neither but he&#39;ll reflexively support anyone who&#39;s anti-Poli=
sh) editors bring it up, while I&#39;ve never seen a Czech or a Slovak give=
 a shit about it).<br>
I don&#39;t think that at this point he&#39;s someone we should invite to j=
oin us but I think we should watch him as a potential ally (he&#39;s pretty=
 anti-commie too) and maybe try to establish some weak connections with him=
 (watch the pages he edits, occasionally throw in a supportive edit, if he =
gets in a dispute on a talk page support him etc) and see how it turns out.=
<br>
<br>Also, just for the record at this time I&#39;d be against asking Loosem=
ark to join. Support him, yes, and keep talking to him, but I&#39;d hold of=
f on anything more than that.<br><br>Radek<br><br>

--0015175cdd26384672046dc03a06--


--===============2282235993468626228==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2282235993468626228==--


