X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  2 16:28:53 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906020151r2bc76954t97affdaa237a1d22@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A238480.5040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906010158l333a1c0bwd3d1255df947b517@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A240F9A.5040108@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906011031p4b179ea6gffb621a35f27587d@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2420BE.60108@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906011151l21045a78n579e1ad2bf519f80@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906011524x15349ae0hfe6f40ecff5ddfbc@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906011555mf106db9rc3944fe7bd94d675@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A24C451.6010301@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906020151r2bc76954t97affdaa237a1d22@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:28:32 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70906020728g3afd6110l5f99cd93ddf01fff@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  If Molobo did indeed use sock puppets (what I was
	suspecting early on, hence my silence here) and gets permabanned, I can
	actually send him a number of unused dormant account I have gathered. I
	just happened to find a list with acces data to those, when I was moving
	out of my flat and thus collecting all those bits and pieces :O [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] [WMP] Molobo ban
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  If Molobo did indeed use sock puppets (what I was
	suspecting early on, hence my silence here) and gets permabanned, I can
	actually send him a number of unused dormant account I have gathered. I
	just happened to find a list with acces data to those, when I was moving
	out of my flat and thus collecting all those bits and pieces :O [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

If Molobo did indeed use sock puppets (what I was suspecting early on,
hence my silence here) and gets permabanned, I can actually send him a
number of unused dormant account I have gathered. I just happened to
find a list with acces data to those, when I was moving out of my flat
and thus collecting all those bits and pieces :O

Have a nice day,
Miacek.

On 02/06/2009, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 09:18, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>
>> > Per multiple sources, the most important of the obvious reasons expire
>> > in about three months.
>>
>> You guys lost me here :) What obvious reasons? :D
>
>
> In this context, the checkuser data.  Checkusers routinely report users who
> left more than three months ago as "stale".
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

