X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:21:24 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A3EA313.9000901@post.pl>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0906211358w1eb0730dm77226d89a49f0d58@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211400v198e9443nc9ad234ff6b1cbc5@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3EA313.9000901@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:20:53 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906211420o795c6cd0o2e7950245f8e3135@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:16, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > > would be willing to submit to a wider
	discussion, in which several > uninvolved admins (likely regulars at AE
	would be the best) would review > my and your comments on this issue
	and
	other evidence, and decide > whether any of us have improperly, and in
	particular, whether I should > avoid EE threads at AE, and whether your
	comments towards me were > appropriate. --~~~~ [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4541963368808947976=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:16, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > > would be willing to submit to a wider
	discussion, in which several > uninvolved admins (likely regulars at AE
	would be the best) would review > my and your comments on this issue and
	other evidence, and decide > whether any of us have improperly, and in
	particular, whether I should > avoid EE threads at AE, and whether your
	comments towards me were > appropriate. --~~~~ [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4541963368808947976==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b7c61bfb29046ce255df

--001636c5b7c61bfb29046ce255df
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:16, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>
> would be willing to submit to a wider discussion, in which several
> uninvolved admins (likely regulars at AE would be the best) would review
> my and your comments on this issue and other evidence, and decide
> whether any of us have improperly, and in particular, whether I should
> avoid EE threads at AE, and whether your comments towards me were
> appropriate. --~~~~


Sneaky.  Classical example of how a Lawful Good character plays ;-)
And easy to dismiss through the Ghirlandajo Gambit.  I'm not sure how well
Jehochman can do it, however.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5b7c61bfb29046ce255df
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:16, Piotr Konieczny <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<blockquote class=3D"g=
mail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-l=
eft:1ex;">

would be willing to submit to a wider discussion, in which several<br>
uninvolved admins (likely regulars at AE would be the best) would review<br=
>
my and your comments on this issue and other evidence, and decide<br>
whether any of us have improperly, and in particular, whether I should<br>
avoid EE threads at AE, and whether your comments towards me were<br>
appropriate. --~~~~</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sneaky. =C2=A0Classical=
 example of how a Lawful Good character plays ;-)</div><div>And easy to dis=
miss through the Ghirlandajo Gambit. =C2=A0I&#39;m not sure how well Jehoch=
man can do it, however.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5b7c61bfb29046ce255df--


--===============4541963368808947976==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4541963368808947976==--


