X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jul 15 00:51:53 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A5D0BFD.6020606@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:51:41 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <bc2.4a4db562.378d5671@aol.com>	<c3b2b3db0907140744q1f74b14cv7b6b84b296b3f6e8@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0907140810l66813775v1c11eabab9dcb7e2@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70907141204r1b7d3849nd6d7e9bd5438434a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6fb557d70907141204r1b7d3849nd6d7e9bd5438434a@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote: > i agree
	that
	Siebert is a rather difficult case, exactly due to his > professional
	approach. He is constantly POV-pushing that e.g. MRP was > some
	inevitable step for ''buying time in order to build defences'' > etc. -
	a completely nonsensical POV, but alas supported by many > Western
	academics. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] question
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote: > i agree that
	Siebert is a rather difficult case, exactly due to his > professional
	approach. He is constantly POV-pushing that e.g. MRP was > some
	inevitable step for ''buying time in order to build defences'' > etc. -
	a completely nonsensical POV, but alas supported by many > Western
	academics. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote:
> i agree that Siebert is a rather difficult case, exactly due to his
> professional approach. He is constantly POV-pushing that e.g. MRP was
> some inevitable step for ''buying time in order to build defences''
> etc. - a completely nonsensical POV, but alas supported by many
> Western academics.

That's fine; if he respects Wiki policies and is ammenable to reaching a 
consensus, that the type of an editor that should be welcomed. We may 
disagree with his POV, but it is worth remembering we are not perfect :)

Our enemies are wikilawyering trolls, not people who have different POV.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

