X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jul 27 11:08:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880907262359v40ab7e8el1b116f464bfd0b56@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f826636f0907251156x6a440551v26bbe8d50743dcbc@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0907251240j4f84a928n672bb1ce8d2c4d8f@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0907251522i4daf8b6are8f1fe105c844e0c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0907260201o6b7c726o60e7787655455720@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0907261413r30f8f4wf1dcd336d1d709ea@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880907262359v40ab7e8el1b116f464bfd0b56@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:08:23 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0907270208t60d76d29x4c1eb2ab10c28915@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:59, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > No big deal. I don't think that a block
	log can be cleansed anyway. AFAIU, it theoretically can be, but the
	official position is that it "will not be done without a good reason
	such as an obvious error". IOW, if you have a block log entry, it means
	your block log entry should not be deleted. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] mistake
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9021324874105860547=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:59, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > No big deal. I don't think that a block
	log can be cleansed anyway. AFAIU, it theoretically can be, but the
	official position is that it "will not be done without a good reason
	such as an obvious error". IOW, if you have a block log entry, it means
	your block log entry should not be deleted. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============9021324874105860547==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d460a7cf9fc3046fac4b0b

--0016e6d460a7cf9fc3046fac4b0b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:59, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:

> No big deal. I don't think that a block log can be cleansed anyway.


AFAIU, it theoretically can be, but the official position is that it "will
not be done without a good reason such as an obvious error".  IOW, if you
have a block log entry, it means your block log entry should not be deleted.

I inquired Deskana about it two years ago on IRC.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6d460a7cf9fc3046fac4b0b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:59, Martin <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:martint20@gmail.com">martint20@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
No big deal. I don&#39;t think that a block log can be cleansed anyway.</bl=
ockquote><div><br></div><div>AFAIU, it theoretically can be, but the offici=
al position is that it &quot;will not be done without a good reason such as=
 an obvious error&quot;. =C2=A0IOW, if you have a block log entry, it means=
 your block log entry should not be deleted.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I inquired Deskana about it two years ago on IRC.</div>=
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e6d460a7cf9fc3046fac4b0b--


--===============9021324874105860547==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============9021324874105860547==--


