X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jul  6 17:52:22 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A521D99.8030206@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:51:53 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <25890ca0907051248n46416964qc6fa2c7c069a4f9f@mail.gmail.com>	<4A515A8A.2000600@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0907051951v36d2d7aev40a1245bdcc43291@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0907051951v36d2d7aev40a1245bdcc43291@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Andrei Dombay wrote: > Formally, the restriction does
	not prevent anyone from undoing > vandalism. However, a decision if
	something represents vandalism or not > may be rather subjective (how
	about inserting false or disputed numbers: >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_for_Height_776&diff=290633831&oldid=290630956
	>
	<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_for_Height_776&diff=290633831&oldid=290630956>)
	> > Moreover, I am afraid to make any two non-sequential edits in the
	same > article during one week, because that can be viewed as 1RR
	violation. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Ok,
 I know these are vandalisms on a serious subject but I thought
 they	were pretty funny
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Andrei Dombay wrote: > Formally, the restriction does
	not prevent anyone from undoing > vandalism. However, a decision if
	something represents vandalism or not > may be rather subjective (how
	about inserting false or disputed numbers: >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_for_Height_776&diff=290633831&oldid=290630956
	>
	<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_for_Height_776&diff=290633831&oldid=290630956>)
	> > Moreover, I am afraid to make any two non-sequential edits in the
	same > article during one week, because that can be viewed as 1RR
	violation. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Andrei Dombay wrote:
> Formally, the restriction does not prevent anyone from undoing 
> vandalism. However, a decision if something represents vandalism or not 
> may be rather subjective (how about inserting false or disputed numbers:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_for_Height_776&diff=290633831&oldid=290630956 
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_for_Height_776&diff=290633831&oldid=290630956>)
> 
> Moreover, I am afraid to make any two non-sequential edits in the same 
> article during one week, because that can be viewed as 1RR violation.

I think you should not be afraid to state exactly this. 1RR is fine, but 
with Radek being punished for 3 reverts in 2 weeks, I think we should 
all note that we are afraid to make more edits at all! I know I am, too...

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

