X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 19 20:45:19 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906191132s3ef7311ck83f6c7bac7bb5fba@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181358tec27236w5a3ad45a11e02432@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190014k624acd6as6a0793df5398e54d@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190412i80309d6kf23d7967fc7b8764@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906190619j14cfa570u7a77a29a69336ac4@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190715w6e35fd30j508a40422aedcbef@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906191029t9a8ab49jc2c0922a0b24c1cd@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3BD227.2080105@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906191107l1fff8199qa764014c613ca439@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906191132s3ef7311ck83f6c7bac7bb5fba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:45:09 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0906191145gfa5d6d5pf2ea46eada273ba0@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  BTW, Diguwren,
	I think O. might have a better chance of
	getting you restricted if he filed an AE request about you several days
	ago, as he discussed with Sandstein. But right now any side will have
	very poor chances of starting anything at all. If PU or O starts
	something about you or others, one should simply inform Sandstein about
	this. Let's wait when they do it. But they will wait too. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6810023344567819209=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  BTW, Diguwren, I think O. might have a better chance of
	getting you restricted if he filed an AE request about you several days
	ago, as he discussed with Sandstein. But right now any side will have
	very poor chances of starting anything at all. If PU or O starts
	something about you or others, one should simply inform Sandstein about
	this. Let's wait when they do it. But they will wait too. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6810023344567819209==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d348a07bde65046cb7ec0d

--001636d348a07bde65046cb7ec0d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

BTW, Diguwren, I think O. might have a better chance of getting you
restricted if he filed an  AE request about you several days ago, as he
discussed with Sandstein.

But right now any side will have very poor chances of starting anything at
all. If PU or O starts something about you or others, one should simply
inform Sandstein about this. Let's wait when they do it. But they will wait
too.



On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>wrote:

> I am certainly not going to submit anything about anyone (including BF4),
> not even 3RR reports. A couple of last 3RR reports I submitted have been
> ignored, despite of a clear violation. There is nothing we can do with R.,
> O. and PU at this time.  I can not spend too much time at wiki as well. If
> you come up with something, let's discuss it here.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 21:00, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> Andrei Dombay wrote:
>>> > I am afraid this will be seen as an intentional disruption, an action
>>> > intended to "generate a lot of dramu", exactly as you tell. And it may
>>> > be punished as [[WP:POINT]]. People are really getting tired of our
>>> > dramas. Let's be quite.  My filing was obviously a bad mistake. We
>>> > should not make things worse ourselves. Our opponents will do it.
>>>
>>
>> Right, it was a silly idea.  Anyway, the issue is moot now, as all three
>> AE threads are now closed with no action.
>>
>> --
>> Andres Soolo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>

--001636d348a07bde65046cb7ec0d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

BTW, Diguwren, I think O. might have a better chance of getting you restric=
ted if he filed an=A0 AE request about you several days ago, as he discusse=
d with Sandstein. <br><br>But right now any side will have very poor chance=
s of starting anything at all. If PU or O starts something about you or oth=
ers, one should simply inform Sandstein about this. Let&#39;s wait when the=
y do it. But they will wait too. =A0 <br>
<br>=A0<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:32 PM, =
Andrei Dombay <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com=
">wikibiophys@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt=
 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I am certainly not going to submit anything about anyone (including BF4), n=
ot even 3RR reports. A couple of last 3RR reports I submitted have been ign=
ored, despite of a clear violation. There is nothing we can do with R., O. =
and PU at this time.=A0 I can not spend too much time at wiki as well. If y=
ou come up with something, let&#39;s discuss it here.<br>

<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">On=
 Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Digwuren <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"ma=
ilto:digwuren@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span=
> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px sol=
id rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div>=
<div></div><div class=3D"h5">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 21:00, Piotr Koniec=
zny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); ma=
rgin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">


<div>Andrei Dombay wrote:<br>
&gt; I am afraid this will be seen as an intentional disruption, an action<=
br>
&gt; intended to &quot;generate a lot of dramu&quot;, exactly as you tell. =
And it may<br>
&gt; be punished as [[WP:POINT]]. People are really getting tired of our<br=
>
&gt; dramas. Let&#39;s be quite. =A0My filing was obviously a bad mistake. =
We<br>
&gt; should not make things worse ourselves. Our opponents will do it.</div=
></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Right, it was a silly idea. =A0Anyw=
ay, the issue is moot now, as all three AE threads are now closed with no a=
ction.</div>


<div><br></div></div><font color=3D"#888888">-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
</font><br></div></div><div class=3D"im">__________________________________=
_____________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net" target=3D"_blank">folks@wikipedo=
meter.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br>

--001636d348a07bde65046cb7ec0d--


--===============6810023344567819209==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6810023344567819209==--


