X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  9 09:48:38 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0906081128i6518aa43nad634af788a23026@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0906060616s7dd20794o40b98d98be6687c8@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906071531n102e5748u8142b4308b2535ef@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906071619p4a65b22hdefac48108ef0a84@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906071711s582ed998kd1d2a6b2ae04c432@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906072316l54bd7f3cr8db9d08928734a3a@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2CD905.8030904@post.pl> <4A2CE548.60607@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0906080626n2ba36a96id98c930a3d94221b@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906081106w5343e102rb5326d0a9965e5ba@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906081128i6518aa43nad634af788a23026@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:48:24 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906090048w579bf962k8743af75ef900ceb@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: WHY is that 3RR report still open? Every other single
	3RR report on that page has been dealt with, including 8 that followed
	that one. None of the admins have chimed in which they usually do.
	There's some good to this as it's given Deacon another opportunity to
	show up and make another insulting comment. But I'm just tired out by
	it. Skapperod's latest "amendments" are at 7:38 June 9, I filed it at
	5:39 June 8, so it's been more than 24 hrs. And now he's gone from
	"squirming" to "weaseling". [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Skapperod on the roll
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  WHY is that 3RR report still open? Every other single
	3RR report on that page has been dealt with, including 8 that followed
	that one. None of the admins have chimed in which they usually do.
	There's some good to this as it's given Deacon another opportunity to
	show up and make another insulting comment. But I'm just tired out by
	it. Skapperod's latest "amendments" are at 7:38 June 9, I filed it at
	5:39 June 8, so it's been more than 24 hrs. And now he's gone from
	"squirming" to "weaseling". [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

WHY is that 3RR report still open? Every other single 3RR report on
that page has been dealt with, including 8 that followed that one.
None of the admins have chimed in which they usually do. There's some
good to this as it's given Deacon another opportunity to show up and
make another insulting comment. But I'm just tired out by it.
Skapperod's latest "amendments" are at  7:38 June 9, I filed it at
5:39 June 8, so it's been more than 24 hrs. And now he's gone from
"squirming" to "weaseling".

Radek


2009/6/8 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>:
> Sure:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archi=
ve_24#Towns.27_websites_as_a_source_for_history
> (above was the biggest one)
>
> Here:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources/archive_20#W=
ebsites_of_towns
>
> And here:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archi=
ve_24#Towns.27_websites_acceptable_as_a_temporary_source_for_history
>
> So far Skapperod tried to counter them claiming they are non-reliable or
> Self-published. Fringe accusation is new but hardly strong-he uses almost
> exclusively German sources so it can be countered that he doesn't full
> picture of scholary works.
>
>
> W dniu 8 czerwca 2009 20:06 u=BFytkownik radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
> napisa=B3:
>>
>> "he took part in discussions on =A0RS noticeboard trying to ban Polish
>> cities statements as source of information and the general opinion was
>> against him."
>>
>> You have a diff for that? If not I'll go digging.
>>
>> 2009/6/8 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>:
>> > Besides 3RR this also is usefull for RfC as Skapperod goes against
>> > consensus-he took part in discussions on=A0 RS noticeboard trying to b=
an
>> > Polish cities statements as source of information and the general
>> > opinion
>> > was against him. He uses the same arguments now he used then, which we=
re
>> > rejected by community.
>> > Also-I think there is a template to indicate biased sources(that is
>> > concentrated on one world location) it would be good to use as the
>> > Ko=B3obrzeg
>> > article is now based on almost only German books.
>> >
>> > 2009/6/8 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
>> >>
>> >> Piotr Konieczny wrote:
>> >> > radek szulga wrote:
>> >> >> And I think Skap just reverted again after Tymek which would make =
it
>> >> >> 4
>> >> >> - though it's hard to tell because of his editing style.
>> >> >
>> >> > I think he did; I don't have time right now to analyze this but if
>> >> > somebody could do so it would be great. Remember: all it takes is to
>> >> > show that he removed/restored something that was removed/restored by
>> >> > others in a single article 4 times within 24h; those 4 edits don't
>> >> > need
>> >> > to be the same.
>> >>
>> >> Here are 4 reverts - I don't have time to file a report myself; it
>> >> should be noted that more reverts can be found in his recent edits on
>> >> this page, although they fall in longer strings of edits mixed with
>> >> non-reverts. Those four, however, are pretty clear:
>> >> *
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D295=
052744&oldid=3D295039187
>> >> *
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D295=
058475&oldid=3D295057425
>> >> *
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D295=
058475&oldid=3D295057425
>> >> *
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3D295=
142920&oldid=3D295141645
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __
>> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
>> >> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here." =A0 =A0 |||
>> >> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
>> >> =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> >> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> >> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> > folks@wikipedometer.net
>> > http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

