X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul 11 21:45:42 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0905171211x4f4b3f44m6f833bc0823242e8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0905171211x4f4b3f44m6f833bc0823242e8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:45:29 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0907111245q43767204g85449e057c8ba577@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=0016e6ddab32c89d3f046e7354e5
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: To all email users-this message comes with text file
	where I wrote down my earlier draft of my RFC against Skapperod.
	Request
	for comment regarding user Skapperod I would like to report and ask for
	comment as well as possible sanctions situation arising from the
	behaviour of user Skapperod. The user in my view is currently engaging
	in persistent intimidation of Wikipedians opposing his POV on ANI
	forums, instead of engaging in debate on particular articles.
	Additionally his continued interaction with others on talk and
	discussion pages is agressive and harmfull to productive cooperation.
	Just as well the edits made in articles themselfs are heavily biased
	and
	seem to violate several Wiki policies such NPOV and RS, UNDUE. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] RfC regarding Skapperod
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  To all email users-this message comes with text file
	where I wrote down my earlier draft of my RFC against Skapperod. Request
	for comment regarding user Skapperod I would like to report and ask for
	comment as well as possible sanctions situation arising from the
	behaviour of user Skapperod. The user in my view is currently engaging
	in persistent intimidation of Wikipedians opposing his POV on ANI
	forums, instead of engaging in debate on particular articles.
	Additionally his continued interaction with others on talk and
	discussion pages is agressive and harmfull to productive cooperation.
	Just as well the edits made in articles themselfs are heavily biased and
	seem to violate several Wiki policies such NPOV and RS, UNDUE. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--0016e6ddab32c89d3f046e7354e5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

To all email users-this message comes with text file where I wrote
down my earlier draft of my RFC against Skapperod.

--0016e6ddab32c89d3f046e7354e5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="Skap.txt"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Skap.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Attachment-Id: f_fuu4aic20

[encoded data, 13224 characters]
--0016e6ddab32c89d3f046e7354e5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--0016e6ddab32c89d3f046e7354e5--


