X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun May 24 23:19:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880905241413v2e69659dt38897431bfaa4f9a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0905231259r4ffb1fa7i350386b8cd565ea@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0905240459g618ce5bbod4c4be35baa9d4df@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880905241413v2e69659dt38897431bfaa4f9a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 07:19:28 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880905241419yc2d5a99n4bf4ee8f673e50b3@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  But then again perhaps AdjustShift is looking for a
	change of IP location that would indicate the alleged sock account has
	been handed over. This counter intelligence stuff is so tricky. On Mon,
	May 25, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > I note
	that AdjustShift has delayed closing the case from the 24th to > the
	29th. Perhaps he doesn't have "secret evidence" per se, but some > kind
	of "secret" method of collecting it and the delay is intended to >
	provide more time to observe Molobo's behaviour with this method. That >
	would fit with Sciurinæ's desire to keep it secret for future >
	investigations. > > What I suspect is that AdjustShift will release is
	the results of this > method, while keeping this method itself secret.
	Ofcourse this is all > just pure speculation. I don't believe Molobo was
	engaged in > sockpuppetry, as I don't think he is that dumb. But just
	for > argument's sake the course of action would be to privately
	handover > the username and password of this sock account to some
	trusted third > party so that ongoing activity cannot be linked. But
	again this is > just speculation. > > Martin > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at
	9:59 PM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at
	22:59, Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> A rather
	unpleasant attempt is being made during a sockpuppet >>> investigation
	into my person. Mainly to accept "secret evidence" that is >>> being
	produced by German editors making the accusations. >> >> Any idea on
	what the evidence might be? >> -- >> Andres Soolo >> >> >> Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> >> > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Assistance required
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  But then again perhaps AdjustShift is looking for a
	change of IP location that would indicate the alleged sock account has
	been handed over. This counter intelligence stuff is so tricky. On Mon,
	May 25, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > I note
	that AdjustShift has delayed closing the case from the 24th to > the
	29th. Perhaps he doesn't have "secret evidence" per se, but some > kind
	of "secret" method of collecting it and the delay is intended to >
	provide more time to observe Molobo's behaviour with this method. That >
	would fit with Sciurinæ's desire to keep it secret for future >
	investigations. > > What I suspect is that AdjustShift will release is
	the results of this > method, while keeping this method itself secret.
	Ofcourse this is all > just pure speculation. I don't believe Molobo was
	engaged in > sockpuppetry, as I don't think he is that dumb. But just
	for > argument's sake the course of action would be to privately
	handover > the username and password of this sock account to some
	trusted third > party so that ongoing activity cannot be linked. But
	again this is > just speculation. > > Martin > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at
	9:59 PM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at
	22:59, Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> A rather
	unpleasant attempt is being made during a sockpuppet >>> investigation
	into my person. Mainly to accept "secret evidence" that is >>> being
	produced by German editors making the accusations. >> >> Any idea on
	what the evidence might be? >> -- >> Andres Soolo >> >> >> Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> >> > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

But then again perhaps AdjustShift is looking for a change of IP
location that would indicate the alleged sock account has been handed
over. This counter intelligence stuff is so tricky.

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:
> I note that AdjustShift has delayed closing the case from the 24th to
> the 29th. Perhaps he doesn't have "secret evidence" per se, but some
> kind of "secret" method of collecting it and the delay is intended to
> provide more time to observe Molobo's behaviour with this method. That
> would fit with Sciurin=E6's desire to keep it secret for future
> investigations.
>
> What I suspect is that AdjustShift will release is the results of this
> method, while keeping this method itself secret. Ofcourse this is all
> just pure speculation. I don't believe Molobo was engaged in
> sockpuppetry, as I don't think he is that dumb. But just for
> argument's sake the course of action would be to privately handover
> the username and password of this sock account to some trusted third
> party so that ongoing activity cannot be linked. But again this is
> just speculation.
>
> Martin
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 22:59, Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> A rather unpleasant attempt is being made during a sockpuppet
>>> investigation into my person. Mainly to accept "secret evidence" that is
>>> being produced by German editors making the accusations.
>>
>> Any idea on what the evidence might be?
>> --
>> Andres Soolo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

