X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Apr 30 01:24:03 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <761602.3692.qm@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <761602.3692.qm@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:23:54 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0904291623s625ca734oe1d5b8fa5eec45d7@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:39, Christian Suciu
	<christiansuciu@yahoo.com>wrote: > Good idea or not? The responses are
	bound to be amusing, at any rate. > It might work. However, regular
	Wikipedians generally patmatch against a number of "propaganda" markers,
	and your initial suggestion is rich of likely such markers. Can you
	improve it in this regard? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Good idea?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4060465960348487999=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.8
X-Spam_score_int: 18
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:39, Christian Suciu
	<christiansuciu@yahoo.com>wrote: > Good idea or not? The responses are
	bound to be amusing, at any rate. > It might work. However, regular
	Wikipedians generally patmatch against a number of "propaganda" markers,
	and your initial suggestion is rich of likely such markers. Can you
	improve it in this regard? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4992]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4060465960348487999==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163662e5c6831dce0468b9df1f

--00163662e5c6831dce0468b9df1f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:39, Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>wrote:

> Good idea or not? The responses are bound to be amusing, at any rate.
>

It might work.  However, regular Wikipedians generally patmatch against a
number of "propaganda" markers, and your initial suggestion is rich of
likely such markers.  Can you improve it in this regard?

For example, the reference to "exposing the truth" is likely to be
interpreted as associated to WP:TRUTH or conspiracy theories in general.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--00163662e5c6831dce0468b9df1f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:39, Christian Suciu <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:christiansuciu@yahoo.com">christians=
uciu@yahoo.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0"><tbody><tr><td vali=
gn=3D"top" style=3D"font:inherit"><div>Good idea or not? The responses are =
bound to be amusing, at any rate.<br></div></td></tr></tbody></table></bloc=
kquote>
<div><br></div><div>It might work. =C2=A0However, regular Wikipedians gener=
ally patmatch against a number of &quot;propaganda&quot; markers, and your =
initial suggestion is rich of likely such markers. =C2=A0Can you improve it=
 in this regard?</div>
<div><br></div><div>For example, the reference to &quot;exposing the truth&=
quot; is likely to be interpreted as associated to WP:TRUTH or conspiracy t=
heories in general.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--00163662e5c6831dce0468b9df1f--


--===============4060465960348487999==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4060465960348487999==--


