X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 15 19:25:13 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 725890.28843.bm@omp203.mail.sp1.yahoo.com
Message-ID: <560456.57299.qm@web45103.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: vJl1X14VM1ktI.owDozjLm5uvlNtzs.1PzfhN_ppxFwCYl42EFc49SVyVvChuMqqlZQCaPhEmmaGAWniZw3EbPpl3nLsXLJ3fHG47lyyr3UOj3NOvo2g8aC3_QCEZoXJPP4_qaTdlk9BkRd4LoKfkrHgu8vIsa_kJcvkwMtk5Wb6QV1duy876iZldS3mSvByPDS0ZZG3kAV4GMjdkds6HoH3i6_Y3V8Ed9bqm1Rgo.bX46GBMa_Cg_UtTrteMEwWP7HrxO4JCsbRzTWJq0a14Y2TA5LZCaEtLjNqtcqUYO7mcg--
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.4.12 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi Piotrek, Well... I think that Radeksz should have
	amin. rights first and very soon. Of course if he wants to. As for
	myself I don't feel comfortable with that yet plus my block history is
	bad. Jacek [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Sandstein is done; Shotlandiya sanctioned
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4131799129317382349=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hi Piotrek, Well... I think that Radeksz should have
	amin. rights first and very soon. Of course if he wants to. As for
	myself I don't feel comfortable with that yet plus my block history is
	bad. Jacek [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============4131799129317382349==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-709649071-1245086684=:57299"


--0-709649071-1245086684=:57299
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi Piotrek,
Well... I think that Radeksz should have amin. rights first and very soon. Of course if he wants to.
As for myself I don't feel comfortable with that yet plus my block history is bad.
Jacek


--- On Fri, 6/12/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:


From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
Subject: Re: [WPM] Sandstein is done; Shotlandiya sanctioned
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 10:47 PM


Andrei Dombay wrote:
> Many people including some of us could be also sanctioned for edit 
> warring and questionable edits. A lesson to be learned.

Don't revert more then twice on article per day, unless you are dealing 
with clear vandalism or a solely noobie/ip that will not have cabal support.

Or you are an admin (but even I try to avoid 3 rr). Which reminds me: we 
should really start thinking about getting adminship. Who wants to go 
first and SOON? We need to try our strength at RfA.

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks



      
--0-709649071-1245086684=:57299
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>Hi Piotrek,</DIV>
<DIV>Well... I think that Radeksz should have amin. rights first and very soon. Of course if he wants to.</DIV>
<DIV>As for myself I don't feel comfortable with that yet plus my block history is bad.</DIV>
<DIV>Jacek</DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR>--- On <B>Fri, 6/12/09, Piotr Konieczny <I>&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: Piotr Konieczny &lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;<BR>Subject: Re: [WPM] Sandstein is done; Shotlandiya sanctioned<BR>To: "Wikipedia statistics" &lt;folks@wikipedometer.net&gt;<BR>Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 10:47 PM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail>Andrei Dombay wrote:<BR>&gt; Many people including some of us could be also sanctioned for edit <BR>&gt; warring and questionable edits. A lesson to be learned.<BR><BR>Don't revert more then twice on article per day, unless you are dealing <BR>with clear vandalism or a solely noobie/ip that will not have cabal support.<BR><BR>Or you are an admin (but even I try to avoid 3 rr). Which reminds me: we <BR>should really start thinking about getting adminship. Who wants to go <BR>first and SOON? We need to try our strength at RfA.<BR><BR>-- <BR>Piotr Konieczny<BR><BR>"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in <BR>theory."<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Wikipedia statistics discussion list<BR><A href="http://us.mc451.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=folks@wikipedometer.net" ymailto="mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</A><BR><A
 href="http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=_blank>http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table><br>

      
--0-709649071-1245086684=:57299--



--===============4131799129317382349==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4131799129317382349==--



