X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jul 15 01:14:56 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A5D0CD1.8090601@post.pl>
References: <bc2.4a4db562.378d5671@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907140744q1f74b14cv7b6b84b296b3f6e8@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907140810l66813775v1c11eabab9dcb7e2@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70907141204r1b7d3849nd6d7e9bd5438434a@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0907141259q4556b7e2o2bd1fb18068e178f@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907141325k3965a4d7o3dbe1bd7513aeffe@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907141333q7e4b585awf017cd7a76f8a6ba@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A5D0CD1.8090601@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:14:53 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0907141614ofa39fbas16899b64c910d4cf@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  2009/7/15 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> > Andrei
	Dombay wrote: > > > At the end, Siebert tells me: "Hey man, I know where
	did you work in > > Moscow": > > > > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gulag&diff=242807712&oldid=242806280
	> > Stalking? > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] question
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1326696037625913049=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  2009/7/15 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> > Andrei
	Dombay wrote: > > > At the end, Siebert tells me: "Hey man, I know where
	did you work in > > Moscow": > > > > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gulag&diff=242807712&oldid=242806280
	> > Stalking? > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1326696037625913049==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64c1ab432bbec046eb29b89

--0016e64c1ab432bbec046eb29b89
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

2009/7/15 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>

> Andrei Dombay wrote:
>
> > At the end, Siebert tells me: "Hey man, I know where did you work in
> > Moscow":
> >
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gulag&diff=242807712&oldid=242806280
>
> Stalking?
>

This is the 3rd or 4th case I see in the last month of stalking Biophys'
(trying to disclose his identity). We should gather material for a future
RfC. But it shouldn't be Biophys who files it. It could be for example two
of the rest of us. We can say that we exchanged these concerns via email and
we (those 2) then thought more and gathered 5-6 cases (more?) of evidence
and present them now to the community...

What we openly should demand IMHO shoulb be that stalking of Biophys, esp.
identity things, should be punishable with outright blocks to the users that
have been previously warned, in particular those we documented that have
committed this already once (a Damocles' sword on to of a couple guys). But
without saying, we hint to the community (ArbCom?) that Biophys' identity
must be circulating from one individual to another (how would they know
otherwise?), hence the existence of a Cabal. We don't have to say it, we
just need to hint it, so we can get the Damocres' sword on top of them.

sometimes in the fall we can do this
dorin

--0016e64c1ab432bbec046eb29b89
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/15 Piotr Konieczny <span dir=3D"l=
tr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div c=
lass=3D"im">
Andrei Dombay wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; At the end, Siebert tells me: &quot;Hey man, I know where did you work=
 in<br>
&gt; Moscow&quot;:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Gulag&amp;=
diff=3D242807712&amp;oldid=3D242806280" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikiped=
ia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Gulag&amp;diff=3D242807712&amp;oldid=3D2428=
06280</a><br>

<br>
</div>Stalking?<br>
<div class=3D"im"></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is the 3rd or=
 4th case I see in the last month of stalking Biophys&#39; (trying to discl=
ose his identity). We should gather material for a future RfC. But it shoul=
dn&#39;t be Biophys who files it. It could be for example two of the rest o=
f us. We can say that we exchanged these concerns via email and we (those 2=
) then thought more and gathered 5-6 cases (more?) of evidence and present =
them now to the community...=A0</div>
<div><br></div><div>What we openly should demand IMHO shoulb be that stalki=
ng of Biophys, esp. identity things, should be punishable with outright blo=
cks to the users that have been previously warned, in particular those we d=
ocumented that have committed this already once (a Damocles&#39; sword on t=
o of a couple guys). But without saying, we hint to the community (ArbCom?)=
 that Biophys&#39; identity must be circulating from one individual to anot=
her (how would they know otherwise?), hence the existence of a Cabal. We do=
n&#39;t have to say it, we just need to hint it, so we can get the Damocres=
&#39; sword on top of them.</div>
<div><br></div><div>sometimes in the fall we can do this</div><div>dorin</d=
iv></div>

--0016e64c1ab432bbec046eb29b89--


--===============1326696037625913049==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1326696037625913049==--


