X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jul  1 14:27:26 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A4A89FA.7080606@post.pl>
References: <494251.20348.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0906291324m488bdf60l2e64cbb8faae4b41@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4953A5.1090708@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906301125r7014ce9se3ef68aef1392490@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4A89FA.7080606@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:27:10 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0907010527m246ce7cci6d1379e94c06959c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 00:56, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Sells well? Amusingly off topic, but I think
	the entire Internet porn > business is a dying breed: anybody with a
	little net know-how can get > all he wants for free - so I suspect its
	only the google-averse older [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Women and Wiklp
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5266096685852921753=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 00:56, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Sells well? Amusingly off topic, but I think
	the entire Internet porn > business is a dying breed: anybody with a
	little net know-how can get > all he wants for free - so I suspect its
	only the google-averse older [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5266096685852921753==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5ad38dfc40b046da40a6a

--001636c5ad38dfc40b046da40a6a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 00:56, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> Sells well? Amusingly off topic, but I think the entire Internet porn
> business is a dying breed: anybody with a little net know-how can get
> all he wants for free - so I suspect its only the google-averse older


It's probably strongly generational, so I wouldn't buy long-term bonds of a
bondage porn company.  But it's only dying, not dead.

Furthermore, another important source for revenues is advertising.  This
will work even when the watcher doesn't pay a red grosz to the shower.  My
sources say that porn advertising revenues are significantly down, but it
seems likely that they pick up again once the economic crisis is over.

conclusion and hypotheses is that given a decade or two the net
> geography may be quite different, as the increasing availability of free


Different, yes.  But it doesn't mean costly net porn will die out within
these decades.  If my hypothesis about the generationality is right, porn
lords will be quite happy knowing that geriatric medicine will advance in
numerous ways.

porn will crush those who try to sell it. Note, I am not saying there
> will be less porn, but I predict there will be much fewer porn-peddlers,
> as almost nobody will want to buy it.


And soon thereafter, there will be 3D porn, and interactive porn, and
old-fashioned static pictures in a browser will go out of fashion -- just
like ancient fertility goddess sculptures did.

Btw, has anybody run into academic study of the 'net porn industry? We
> all keep saying how big it is, but is there any hard data to go with it?


Larry Flynt made an appeal for bailout back when bailing out was the cool
thing to do.   I think he quoted some data about how many porn producers
there are in USA, and how badly they're doing under economic distress.  If
you can find his request, you can check out if his data is usable.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5ad38dfc40b046da40a6a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 00:56, Piotr Konieczny <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">Sells well? Amusingly off topic, but I think the entire I=
nternet porn</div>
business is a dying breed: anybody with a little net know-how can get<br>
all he wants for free - so I suspect its only the google-averse older</bloc=
kquote><div><br></div><div>It&#39;s probably strongly generational, so I wo=
uldn&#39;t buy long-term bonds of a bondage porn company. =C2=A0But it&#39;=
s only dying, not dead.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Furthermore, another important source for revenues is a=
dvertising. =C2=A0This will work even when the watcher doesn&#39;t pay a re=
d grosz to the shower. =C2=A0My sources say that porn advertising revenues =
are significantly down, but it seems likely that they pick up again once th=
e economic crisis is over.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">conclusion and hypotheses is=
 that given a decade or two the net<br>
geography may be quite different, as the increasing availability of free</b=
lockquote><div><br></div><div>Different, yes. =C2=A0But it doesn&#39;t mean=
 costly net porn will die out within these decades. =C2=A0If my hypothesis =
about the generationality is right, porn lords will be quite happy knowing =
that geriatric medicine will advance in numerous ways.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">porn will crush those who tr=
y to sell it. Note, I am not saying there<br>
will be less porn, but I predict there will be much fewer porn-peddlers,<br=
>
as almost nobody will want to buy it.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>And s=
oon thereafter, there will be 3D porn, and interactive porn, and old-fashio=
ned static pictures in a browser will go out of fashion -- just like ancien=
t fertility goddess sculptures did.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Btw, has anybody run into ac=
ademic study of the &#39;net porn industry? We<br>
all keep saying how big it is, but is there any hard data to go with it?</b=
lockquote><div><br></div><div>Larry Flynt made an appeal for bailout back w=
hen bailing out was the cool thing to do. =C2=A0 I think he quoted some dat=
a about how many porn producers there are in USA, and how badly they&#39;re=
 doing under economic distress. =C2=A0If you can find his request, you can =
check out if his data is usable.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5ad38dfc40b046da40a6a--


--===============5266096685852921753==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5266096685852921753==--


