X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jul  6 13:38:13 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0907052002w3477b84dhb8186dc1e1823f28@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c0b.5e689382.37816eb0@aol.com>
	<4f045a880907050202o1effdb71p6327da592480d82f@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A516336.3070208@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0907052002w3477b84dhb8186dc1e1823f28@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:37:52 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70907060437x3f35ce54scc73339f383bc7bb@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I've had this userpage in my watchlist since I joined
	in
	October 2008. An academician (of Russian origin, as Piotr stated),
	biased, but not really communist. For a real communist user (true, a
	cautious one) see Soman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Soman [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Are we keeping track (Russavia)?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I've had this userpage in my watchlist since I joined in
	October 2008. An academician (of Russian origin, as Piotr stated),
	biased, but not really communist. For a real communist user (true, a
	cautious one) see Soman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Soman [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I've had this userpage in my watchlist since I joined in October 2008.
An academician (of Russian origin, as Piotr stated), biased, but not
really communist. For a real communist user (true, a cautious one) see
Soman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Soman

M.

On 06/07/2009, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, someone just came today (the account was reactivated after a year):
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unified_Communist_Party_of_Nepal_(Maoist)&diff=prev&oldid=207050720
>
> First thing, he deleted article created by Colchichum, which previously led
> to a conflict between Colchicum and Irpen:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decommunization_in_Russia&diff=prev&oldid=300508749
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>
>> Martin wrote:
>> > I note that Russavia is tagging may topics, like [[Occupation of the
>> > Baltic states]] as Wikiproject_Russia, Shouldn't it really be tagged
>> > Wikiproject_Soviet_Union?
>>
>> I don't think such a WikiProject exists...
>>
>> Btw, I do think we may be assuming to much, hmmm, cabal behind Russavia.
>> Really, he is no more active than I am, for example. Until proven
>> otherwise, we should always consider it highly possible (Ockham razor)
>> that he is just a very active pro-Putin editor (the letter could be
>> explained by pure luck or having a friend in the right place).
>>
>> And seriously, if any country wanted to manage Wikipedia properly, they
>> would be doing a much better job than Russavia and the few others
>> amateurish USSR Forever cabalists and friends.
>>
>> For a cost of 4-5 officials/agents, you can hire that many full hour
>> smart editors, who would have time aplenty to create/adjust content, up
>> to and including possible FAs, get adminship and weight in and likely
>> dominate most subject areas. Seriously, consider what I was able to do,
>> and that's in my spare time (although I am highly addicted to the
>> Wiki... :D). And if you get restricted/banned, you have funds aplenty to
>> get a different ISP / computer / whatever. Heck, they could be rotating
>> agents and everything. You don't even need to dabble to much in
>> controversial articles, there is a ton of uncontroversial Russia article
>> that could be promoted to DYKs/FAs and thus improve Russia image that
>> way. The fact that this is not happening, and the fact that we are more
>> or less holding our own against them, tells me that either they are
>> highly uncompetent/not serious or most likely, we are dealing with
>> amateurish pro-Putin editor(s).
>>
>> --
>> Piotr Konieczny
>>
>> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
>> theory."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

