X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jun 13 09:20:19 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 02:20:00 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906130020r6e5fad93x1d369c3b8df2a1b4@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: And Skapperod is on the roll again. He promised to
	quite
	editing the relevant articles until Friday in order to weasel out of
	the
	3RR violation and as soon as Friday hit he hits again. We're going to
	have to stop this but without any single person reverting more than
	once
	per day. Then either he breaks 3RR again, he gives up or his
	reinforcements show up - though Matthead's on 1RR so I'm not sure how
	much of that he's got. If he's not careful though even without a 3RR
	vio
	we can get him for edit warring - basically by arguing that he's used
	the "cease fire till Friday" promise to weasel out of a 3RR block and
	restarted as soon as Friday came around - getting him to do 3 diff
	reverts on 3 different people (even if they are all a "Polish
	tag-team")
	should be enough to file a case (though I don't think I should be the
	one to do it again - and I won't have the time). There should probably
	be more talk page comments, even if they are fairly superfluous -
	basically take each of his edits and call him on it; the fact that he
	isn't just moving stuff around or providing refs but rewriting the text
	in a POV way in the process. Gotta be careful with the language though.
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Skapperod on the roll AGAIN
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  And Skapperod is on the roll again. He promised to quite
	editing the relevant articles until Friday in order to weasel out of the
	3RR violation and as soon as Friday hit he hits again. We're going to
	have to stop this but without any single person reverting more than once
	per day. Then either he breaks 3RR again, he gives up or his
	reinforcements show up - though Matthead's on 1RR so I'm not sure how
	much of that he's got. If he's not careful though even without a 3RR vio
	we can get him for edit warring - basically by arguing that he's used
	the "cease fire till Friday" promise to weasel out of a 3RR block and
	restarted as soon as Friday came around - getting him to do 3 diff
	reverts on 3 different people (even if they are all a "Polish tag-team")
	should be enough to file a case (though I don't think I should be the
	one to do it again - and I won't have the time). There should probably
	be more talk page comments, even if they are fairly superfluous -
	basically take each of his edits and call him on it; the fact that he
	isn't just moving stuff around or providing refs but rewriting the text
	in a POV way in the process. Gotta be careful with the language though.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

And Skapperod is on the roll again. He promised to quite editing the
relevant articles until Friday in order to weasel out of the 3RR
violation and as soon as Friday hit he hits again. We're going to have
to stop this but without any single person reverting more than once
per day. Then either he breaks 3RR again, he gives up or his
reinforcements show up - though Matthead's on 1RR so I'm not sure how
much of that he's got. If he's not careful though even without a 3RR
vio we can get him for edit warring - basically by arguing that he's
used the "cease fire till Friday" promise to weasel out of a 3RR block
and restarted as soon as Friday came around - getting him to do 3 diff
reverts on 3 different people (even if they are all a "Polish
tag-team") should be enough to file a case (though I don't think I
should be the one to do it again - and I won't have the time). There
should probably be more talk page comments, even if they are fairly
superfluous - basically take each of his edits and call him on it; the
fact that he isn't just moving stuff around or providing refs but
rewriting the text in a POV way in the process. Gotta be careful with
the language though.

I'd love to be able to go on my wiki break knowing that at least some
fear has been put into that guy.

Radek

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

