X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jun 27 11:16:44 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906270015n26713efdy9d48e99eb791eed9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c9b.2da820b4.37771938@aol.com>
	<929ed1ec0906270015n26713efdy9d48e99eb791eed9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:16:32 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906270216y52b72c7egca74f99ecc270112@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Durova suggested that I file an appeal of my
	restriction
	on RFAR (that's this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RFAR
	right?) which if my final appeal to Thorsten (including my argument
	that
	it's best to settle this off wiki and avoid large scale drama) doesn't
	work is what I'm going to do early next week. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Let's give Thatcher some breathing space
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Durova suggested that I file an appeal of my restriction
	on RFAR (that's this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RFAR
	right?) which if my final appeal to Thorsten (including my argument that
	it's best to settle this off wiki and avoid large scale drama) doesn't
	work is what I'm going to do early next week. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Durova suggested that I file an appeal of my restriction on RFAR
(that's this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RFAR right?)
which if my final appeal to Thorsten (including my argument that it's
best to settle this off wiki and avoid large scale drama) doesn't work
is what I'm going to do early next week.

We might want to talk a little bit about how to proceed and any advice
on how to file these things are welcome.
Note some things:
-per the comment above I'm going to play the "neutral party" that
became "collateral damage"
-to make that appear credible I will have to distance myself from some
of you and maybe even make some slightly critical remarks. I might say
something like "...if you compare my clean blog with that of Digwurgen
(sic) or Passwordname, you'll see that..."

Radek


2009/6/27 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
>> It's clear that Thatcher believes there are no innocents in the EE/Baltic
>> saga, so that as soon as one agrees with one contention or the other alo=
ng
>> party lines, they are immediately inducted into the party of their choic=
e.
>> /Peters
>
> Hence, he's out to get the Evil Cabal, or possibly Evil Cabals, not speci=
fic
> cases of misbehaviour. =A0So much for his worry that no Neutral Third Par=
ties
> showed up: they *couldn't*, because if they showed up, they would ipso
> facto=A0be non-neutral!
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

