X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun May 31 22:02:05 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 23:01:48 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0905311301o4ef132d2xa3674fbdd218fe3c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 1.7
X-Spam_score_int: 17
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hypothesis (read: wild-assed guess): the
	DefendEachOther<http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOther>
	ethic is a metric of how established a wikicabal is. Established
	wikicabals can reliably and consistently count on such mutual defence, 
	and thus their members tend to defend themselves on a less frequent
	basis. Newcomers, loners, and members less socially cohesive wikicabals
	can not afford to rely on such defence and thus, fearing that supportive
	points are not made at all, are more inclined to push their own points.
	In this regard, the fact that Deacon himself had to resort to posting <
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AN#Close_this_drama-mongering>
	is
	an encouraging sign: he is not confident that anybody else would push
	it. Since he's a major participant in the original drama, his call to
	closing *some* of the drama can be countered by some justified
	counterdrama of the "Please do not try to deflect the discussion from
	your misbehaviour" kind. (There's probably no need for this, unless
	something unexpected happens. AFAIU, the drama is currently in a stage
	where few outside people would dare to get involved.) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.4 HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 BODY: Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] On wikistablishments
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4980503288916594300=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.6
X-Spam_score_int: 26
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hypothesis (read: wild-assed guess): the
	DefendEachOther<http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOther>
	ethic is a metric of how established a wikicabal is. Established
	wikicabals can reliably and consistently count on such mutual defence,
	and thus their members tend to defend themselves on a less frequent
	basis. Newcomers, loners, and members less socially cohesive wikicabals
	can not afford to rely on such defence and thus, fearing that supportive
	points are not made at all, are more inclined to push their own points.
	In this regard, the fact that Deacon himself had to resort to posting <
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AN#Close_this_drama-mongering> is
	an encouraging sign: he is not confident that anybody else would push
	it. Since he's a major participant in the original drama, his call to
	closing *some* of the drama can be countered by some justified
	counterdrama of the "Please do not try to deflect the discussion from
	your misbehaviour" kind. (There's probably no need for this, unless
	something unexpected happens. AFAIU, the drama is currently in a stage
	where few outside people would dare to get involved.) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.4 HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10   BODY: Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	-0.7 BAYES_20               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20%
	[score: 0.0774]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-1.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4980503288916594300==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364592e8a8043a046b3ac7e0

--0016364592e8a8043a046b3ac7e0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hypothesis (read: wild-assed guess): the
DefendEachOther<http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOther>
ethic
is a metric of how established a wikicabal is.  Established wikicabals can
reliably and consistently count on such mutual defence, and thus their
members tend to defend themselves on a less frequent basis.  Newcomers,
loners, and members less socially cohesive wikicabals can not afford to rely
on such defence and thus, fearing that supportive points are not made at
all, are more inclined to push their own points.
In this regard, the fact that Deacon himself had to resort to posting <
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AN#Close_this_drama-mongering> is an
encouraging sign: he is not confident that anybody else would push it.
 Since he's a major participant in the original drama, his call to closing
*some* of the drama can be countered by some justified counterdrama of the
"Please do not try to deflect the discussion from your misbehaviour" kind.
 (There's probably no need for this, unless something unexpected happens.
 AFAIU,  the drama is currently in a stage where few outside people would
dare to get involved.)

On the other hand, if such defensive actions could be quantified, it might
possibly be developed into a tool for mapping and analysing cabals.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016364592e8a8043a046b3ac7e0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hypothesis (read: wild-assed guess): the=C2=A0<a href=3D"http://www.usemod.=
com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOther">DefendEachOther</a>=C2=A0ethic is a metr=
ic of how established a wikicabal is. =C2=A0Established wikicabals can reli=
ably and consistently count on such mutual defence, and thus their members =
tend to defend themselves on a less frequent basis. =C2=A0Newcomers, loners=
, and members less socially cohesive wikicabals can not afford to rely on s=
uch defence and thus, fearing that supportive points are not made at all, a=
re more inclined to push their own points.<div>
<br></div><div>In this regard, the fact that Deacon himself had to resort t=
o posting &lt;<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AN#Close_th=
is_drama-mongering">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AN#Close_this_dr=
ama-mongering</a>&gt; is an encouraging sign: he is not confident that anyb=
ody else would push it. =C2=A0Since he&#39;s a major participant in the ori=
ginal drama, his call to closing *some* of the drama can be countered by so=
me justified counterdrama of the &quot;Please do not try to deflect the dis=
cussion from your misbehaviour&quot; kind. =C2=A0(There&#39;s probably no n=
eed for this, unless something unexpected happens. =C2=A0AFAIU, =C2=A0the d=
rama is currently in a stage where few outside people would dare to get inv=
olved.)</div>
<div><br></div><div>On the other hand, if such defensive actions could be q=
uantified, it might possibly be developed into a tool for mapping and analy=
sing cabals.</div><div><br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
</div>

--0016364592e8a8043a046b3ac7e0--


--===============4980503288916594300==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4980503288916594300==--


