X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Sep  9 18:23:58 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4AA7D6E2.5000607@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:25:06 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.17
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <184746.12419.qm@web45113.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>	<4AA6A018.7070802@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0909081125h249d985te9bdd442d8da1666@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0909081125h249d985te9bdd442d8da1666@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Molobo Molobo wrote: > However Piotrus,
	this means we do
	lose a contributor who was able to > absorb time and effort of
	unfriendly contributors, and who did > patricipate in votes.
	additionally Skapperod would gain credibility as > "victim" and
	productive member of Wiki community. I agree that Xx236 is > completely
	clueless as to avoiding personal attacks, but still I think a > word or
	two of warning to him to stop it might avoid a ban. If he >
	continues-well it's sad, but like Hanzo some people are unable to >
	exploit Wiki doublespeak. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Xx236 needs help.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Molobo Molobo wrote: > However Piotrus, this means we do
	lose a contributor who was able to > absorb time and effort of
	unfriendly contributors, and who did > patricipate in votes.
	additionally Skapperod would gain credibility as > "victim" and
	productive member of Wiki community. I agree that Xx236 is > completely
	clueless as to avoiding personal attacks, but still I think a > word or
	two of warning to him to stop it might avoid a ban. If he >
	continues-well it's sad, but like Hanzo some people are unable to >
	exploit Wiki doublespeak. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Molobo Molobo wrote:
> However Piotrus, this means we do lose a contributor who was able to 
> absorb time and effort of unfriendly contributors, and who did 
> patricipate in votes. additionally Skapperod would gain credibility as 
> "victim" and productive member of Wiki community. I agree that Xx236 is 
> completely clueless as to avoiding personal attacks, but still I think a 
> word or two of warning to him to stop it might avoid a ban. If he 
> continues-well it's sad, but like Hanzo some people are unable to 
> exploit Wiki doublespeak.

True, but he is also clueless as how to follow my advice. I gave him 
various advice and warnings over the time, yet he got himself on the DIG 
list some time ago, and the evidence presented at AE is pretty strong.

Defending him would be quite double-standardish - I'd want anybody 
making those kind of PAs against us banned.

If anybody disagrees with me, fine, go ahead and defend him, but I think 
I'll stay this one out. This will also mean that I'll be able to claim 
that I don't defend all Polish editors automatically if such a charge is 
brought against me in the future.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

