X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Sep  9 21:25:30 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0909091221o2d914929n27f916da3e3633ee@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0909080653o7591b5c2j44606a827a5a8533@mail.gmail.com>
	<4fbe29dd0909080702q41b4b80aw6d0ede1c7c62f958@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0909082341g16f2ec66mbbcdc525c863c058@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0909090542j7ded5c09gb9b17786032390d9@mail.gmail.com>
	<4AA7E444.6050602@post.pl>
	<4fbe29dd0909091203s1ac491a9h2208b98dfba553dc@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0909091216l6c6ff7a7tbd383515f86f6e5a@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0909091221o2d914929n27f916da3e3633ee@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:25:28 +0300
Message-ID: <4fbe29dd0909091225i73e59f0an2c9ddf25775dadd3@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?U2FuZGVyIFPDpGRl?= <sander.sade@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  "Russavia, by this
	edit<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Russavia&diff=312825975&oldid=312820426>you
	violated the topic ban imposed at
	[10]<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Russavia&diff=312584256&oldid=312561859>,
	as you yourself admit in the edit at issue. As announced in the message
	imposing the topic ban, I have indefinitely blocked you in enforcement
	of, and under the authority of, WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary
	sanctions<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DIGWUREN#Discretionary_sanctions>.
	I will unblock you if you convincingly agree to abide by your topic ban,
	which I might add has general support at WP:ANI#Arbitration enforcement
	sanction<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ANI#Arbitration_enforcement_sanction>.
	Should you want to contest this block, which you may do by following the
	instructions at WP:GAB <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GAB>, I
	would like to note that this block is an arbitration enforcement action
	and as such may not be lifted except through the appeals procedure set
	forth in WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary
	sanctions<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DIGWUREN#Discretionary_sanctions>.
	As to any complaints you may have with respect to other editors, you may
	raise them in any appropriate forum, including
	WP:AE<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AE>, after the expiration
	of your topic ban. * Sandstein
	*<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sandstein>19:14, 9 September 2009
	(UTC)" [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Russavia got Bannned !
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0761986739708641375=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  "Russavia, by this
	edit<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Russavia&diff=312825975&oldid=312820426>you
	violated the topic ban imposed at
	[10]<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Russavia&diff=312584256&oldid=312561859>,
	as you yourself admit in the edit at issue. As announced in the message
	imposing the topic ban, I have indefinitely blocked you in enforcement
	of, and under the authority of, WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary
	sanctions<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DIGWUREN#Discretionary_sanctions>.
	I will unblock you if you convincingly agree to abide by your topic ban,
	which I might add has general support at WP:ANI#Arbitration enforcement
	sanction<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ANI#Arbitration_enforcement_sanction>.
	Should you want to contest this block, which you may do by following the
	instructions at WP:GAB <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GAB>, I
	would like to note that this block is an arbitration enforcement action
	and as such may not be lifted except through the appeals procedure set
	forth in WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary
	sanctions<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DIGWUREN#Discretionary_sanctions>.
	As to any complaints you may have with respect to other editors, you may
	raise them in any appropriate forum, including
	WP:AE<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AE>, after the expiration
	of your topic ban. * Sandstein
	*<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sandstein>19:14, 9 September 2009
	(UTC)" [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0761986739708641375==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64c0b6cab29f604732a0bb2

--0016e64c0b6cab29f604732a0bb2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

"Russavia, by this
edit<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Russavia&diff=312825975&oldid=312820426>you
violated the topic ban imposed at
[10]<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Russavia&diff=312584256&oldid=312561859>,
as you yourself admit in the edit at issue. As announced in the message
imposing the topic ban, I have indefinitely blocked you in enforcement of,
and under the authority of, WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary
sanctions<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DIGWUREN#Discretionary_sanctions>.
I will unblock you if you convincingly agree to abide by your topic ban,
which I might add has general support at WP:ANI#Arbitration enforcement
sanction<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ANI#Arbitration_enforcement_sanction>.
Should you want to contest this block, which you may do by following the
instructions at WP:GAB <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GAB>, I would
like to note that this block is an arbitration enforcement action and as
such may not be lifted except through the appeals procedure set forth
in WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary
sanctions<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DIGWUREN#Discretionary_sanctions>.
As to any complaints you may have with respect to other editors, you may
raise them in any appropriate forum, including
WP:AE<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AE>,
after the expiration of your topic ban. * Sandstein
*<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sandstein>19:14, 9 September 2009
(UTC)"

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:21 PM, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Man, Russavia is REALLY loosing it. I think the strategy now for the cartel
> is going to be to try and get one of us restricted in the similar way -
> since there's no way that after everything he said Russavia can have his ban
> revoked.
>
> So everyone must be on best behavior, especially Martin whom Russavia is
> particularly singling out for abuse.
>
> Radek
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0016e64c0b6cab29f604732a0bb2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

&quot;Russavia, by <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DU=
ser_talk:Russavia&amp;diff=3D312825975&amp;oldid=3D312820426" class=3D"exte=
rnal text" title=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:R=
ussavia&amp;diff=3D312825975&amp;oldid=3D312820426" rel=3D"nofollow">this e=
dit</a> you violated the topic ban imposed at <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedi=
a.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Russavia&amp;diff=3D312584256&amp;oldid=
=3D312561859" class=3D"external autonumber" title=3D"http://en.wikipedia.or=
g/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Russavia&amp;diff=3D312584256&amp;oldid=3D3=
12561859" rel=3D"nofollow">[10]</a>,
as you yourself admit in the edit at issue. As announced in the message
imposing the topic ban, I have indefinitely blocked you in enforcement
of, and under the authority of, <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wik=
ipedia:DIGWUREN#Discretionary_sanctions" title=3D"Wikipedia:DIGWUREN" class=
=3D"mw-redirect">WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary sanctions</a>. I will unblock yo=
u if you convincingly agree to abide by your topic ban, which I might add h=
as general support at <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ANI=
#Arbitration_enforcement_sanction" title=3D"" class=3D"mw-redirect">WP:ANI#=
Arbitration enforcement sanction</a>. Should you want to contest this block=
, which you may do by following the instructions at <a href=3D"http://en.wi=
kipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GAB" title=3D"Wikipedia:GAB" class=3D"mw-redirec=
t">WP:GAB</a>,
I would like to note that this block is an arbitration enforcement
action and as such may not be lifted except through the appeals
procedure set forth in <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DI=
GWUREN#Discretionary_sanctions" title=3D"Wikipedia:DIGWUREN" class=3D"mw-re=
direct">WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary sanctions</a>. As to any complaints you m=
ay have with respect to other editors, you may raise them in any appropriat=
e forum, including <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AE" ti=
tle=3D"Wikipedia:AE" class=3D"mw-redirect">WP:AE</a>, after the expiration =
of your topic ban. <small><span style=3D"border: 1px solid black; padding: =
1px;"><a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sandstein" title=3D"User=
:Sandstein"><font style=3D"background: blue none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color=
: white; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -mo=
z-background-inline-policy: continuous; font-family: sans-serif;"><b>=C2=A0=
Sandstein=C2=A0</b></font></a></span></small> 19:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)=
&quot;<br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:21 PM, radek szulg=
a <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rsszulga@gmai=
l.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"b=
order-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; paddin=
g-left: 1ex;">
<br>Man, Russavia is REALLY loosing it. I think the strategy now for the ca=
rtel is going to be to try and get one of us restricted in the similar way =
- since there&#39;s no way that after everything he said Russavia can have =
his ban revoked. <br>

<br>So everyone must be on best behavior, especially Martin whom Russavia i=
s particularly singling out for abuse.<br><font color=3D"#888888"><br>Radek=
<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e64c0b6cab29f604732a0bb2--


--===============0761986739708641375==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0761986739708641375==--


