X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul  4 19:50:28 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f826636f0907031318o1ce54b82x924fb078fbd31e40@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f826636f0907031318o1ce54b82x924fb078fbd31e40@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 20:50:15 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0907041050h1bcb8affp766e5f6b73b14162@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Tymek,
	thank you very much for your help. These kind of
	edits and comments are exactly what I had in mind. I need not mention
	the multiple ways they help:* removal of a tag with good comment in the
	talk page, incl. creates precedent if someone reintroduces the tag at a
	later time * discourages Anonimu, who sees that he is alone/isolated
	among editors * the more people read through the article and comment on
	the talk page, the stronger is our claim on existing consensus * if in
	the future a vote or serious debate comes along, you can claim that in
	mean time you had the article in "my watchlist" and followed
	modification as they go by, but did not intervene b/c you are not
	specialist in all those details - your future vote/comment would carry
	weigh, from an editor with a very civil behavior in the article * not to
	mention improvements to the text of the article. * etc, etc Thanks a
	lot. Dorin [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] [[Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina]]
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3681300818107749321=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Tymek, thank you very much for your help. These kind of
	edits and comments are exactly what I had in mind. I need not mention
	the multiple ways they help:* removal of a tag with good comment in the
	talk page, incl. creates precedent if someone reintroduces the tag at a
	later time * discourages Anonimu, who sees that he is alone/isolated
	among editors * the more people read through the article and comment on
	the talk page, the stronger is our claim on existing consensus * if in
	the future a vote or serious debate comes along, you can claim that in
	mean time you had the article in "my watchlist" and followed
	modification as they go by, but did not intervene b/c you are not
	specialist in all those details - your future vote/comment would carry
	weigh, from an editor with a very civil behavior in the article * not to
	mention improvements to the text of the article. * etc, etc Thanks a
	lot. Dorin [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3681300818107749321==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fa168c7948a046de4e7a7

--0016367fa168c7948a046de4e7a7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tymek, thank you very much for your help. These kind of edits and comments
are exactly what I had in mind. I need not mention the multiple ways they
help:* removal of a tag with good comment in the talk page, incl. creates
precedent if someone reintroduces the tag at a later time
* discourages Anonimu, who sees that he is alone/isolated among editors
* the more people read through the article and comment on the talk page, the
stronger is our claim on existing consensus
* if in the future a vote or serious debate comes along, you can claim that
in mean time you had the article in "my watchlist" and followed modification
as they go by, but did not intervene b/c you are not specialist in all those
details - your future vote/comment would carry weigh, from an editor with a
very civil behavior in the article
* not to mention improvements to the text of the article.
* etc, etc
Thanks a lot. Dorin

--0016367fa168c7948a046de4e7a7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Tymek, thank you very much for your help. These kind of edits and comments =
are exactly what I had in mind. I need not mention the multiple ways they h=
elp:<div>* removal of a tag with good comment in the talk page, incl. creat=
es precedent if someone reintroduces the tag at a later time</div>
<div>* discourages Anonimu, who sees that he is alone/isolated among editor=
s</div><div>* the more people read through the article and comment on the t=
alk page, the stronger is our claim on existing consensus=A0</div><div>* if=
 in the future a vote or serious debate comes along, you can claim that in =
mean time you had the article in &quot;my watchlist&quot; and followed modi=
fication as they go by, but did not intervene b/c you are not specialist in=
 all those details - your future vote/comment would carry weigh, from an ed=
itor with a very civil behavior in the article</div>
<div>* not to mention improvements to the text of the article.<br>* etc, et=
c<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">Thanks a lot. Dorin</div></div>

--0016367fa168c7948a046de4e7a7--


--===============3681300818107749321==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3681300818107749321==--


