X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jun 18 22:04:35 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906181257q5ee1749ap4872a277af9b7a6f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181257q5ee1749ap4872a277af9b7a6f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:04:25 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906181304x6fab2980se600cc88f41aaaf8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 22:57, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > What I did was an experiment. There
	are
	two possible outcomes: (1) all of > that is dismissed as content
	dispute
	and bickering, and (2) Offliner and me > are restricted. In the case of
	latter scenario, I would probably submit new > AE requests about
	Russavia, Igny, PU, and BF4, unless you advise that > something else
	would be better. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5089808152625846206=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 22:57, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > What I did was an experiment. There are
	two possible outcomes: (1) all of > that is dismissed as content dispute
	and bickering, and (2) Offliner and me > are restricted. In the case of
	latter scenario, I would probably submit new > AE requests about
	Russavia, Igny, PU, and BF4, unless you advise that > something else
	would be better. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5089808152625846206==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd8d4921c5ab046ca4ea8b

--0016e6dd8d4921c5ab046ca4ea8b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 22:57, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:

> What I did was an experiment. There are two possible outcomes: (1) all of
> that is dismissed as content dispute and bickering, and (2) Offliner and me
> are restricted. In the case of latter scenario, I would probably submit new
> AE requests about Russavia, Igny, PU, and BF4, unless you advise that
> something else would be better.


I see.  Then, an interesting battleplan would be to pretty much ignore the
AE threads, and have the Cartel try to battle alone.  Piotrus: can this
work?

Russavia and Deacon are still important targets.  But if this goes through,
I'd recommend going for BF4 next.  He's got one of the highest
disruption/good edits ratios; a chance of getting him restricted or banned
is among the highest.  Otherwise, the Cartel might start claiming you're
just systematically reporting everybody who has opposed you, actual merit
notwithstanding.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6dd8d4921c5ab046ca4ea8b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 22:57, Andrei Dombay <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com">wikibiophys@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; paddi=
ng-left: 1ex;">
What I did was an experiment. There are two possible outcomes: (1) all of t=
hat is dismissed as content dispute and bickering, and (2) Offliner and me =
are restricted. In the case of latter scenario, I would probably submit new=
 AE requests about Russavia, Igny, PU, and BF4, unless you advise that some=
thing else would be better.</blockquote>
<div><br>I see.=C2=A0 Then, an interesting battleplan would be to pretty mu=
ch ignore the AE threads, and have the Cartel try to battle alone.=C2=A0 Pi=
otrus: can this work?<br></div></div><br>Russavia and Deacon are still impo=
rtant targets.=C2=A0 But if this goes through, I&#39;d recommend going for =
BF4 next.=C2=A0 He&#39;s got one of the highest disruption/good edits ratio=
s; a chance of getting him restricted or banned is among the highest.=C2=A0=
 Otherwise, the Cartel might start claiming you&#39;re just systematically =
reporting everybody who has opposed you, actual merit notwithstanding.<br>
<br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e6dd8d4921c5ab046ca4ea8b--


--===============5089808152625846206==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5089808152625846206==--


