X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Sep  4 07:43:40 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4AA06D75.8000501@post.pl>
References: <718485.23600.qm@web45111.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<4AA06D75.8000501@post.pl>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:43:30 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880909032243m42828593re2ea79d765ed6db3@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I have to agree with Piotr here. On Fri, Sep 4,
	2009 at
	11:29 AM, Piotr Konieczny<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Jack wrote: >> What
	do you guys think? > > We discussed this a month ago or so. The problem
	is - we don't know > anything about him. And he is relatively new. Can
	we trust him? I don't > think that he is a plant :) But are we sure he
	would not reveal the > existence of this list with an ill-thought
	comment? > > > -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about Wikipedia is,
	that it just works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] LOOSMARK should be invited here.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I have to agree with Piotr here. On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at
	11:29 AM, Piotr Konieczny<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Jack wrote: >> What
	do you guys think? > > We discussed this a month ago or so. The problem
	is - we don't know > anything about him. And he is relatively new. Can
	we trust him? I don't > think that he is a plant :) But are we sure he
	would not reveal the > existence of this list with an ill-thought
	comment? > > > -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about Wikipedia is,
	that it just works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I have to agree with Piotr here.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Piotr Konieczny<piokon@post.pl> wrote:
> Jack wrote:
>> What do you guys think?
>
> We discussed this a month ago or so. The problem is - we don't know
> anything about him. And he is relatively new. Can we trust him? I don't
> think that he is a plant :) But are we sure he would not reveal the
> existence of this list with an ill-thought comment?
>
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>



-- 
Regards,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

