X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  2 10:51:37 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A24C451.6010301@post.pl>
References: <4A238480.5040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906010158l333a1c0bwd3d1255df947b517@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A240F9A.5040108@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906011031p4b179ea6gffb621a35f27587d@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2420BE.60108@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906011151l21045a78n579e1ad2bf519f80@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906011524x15349ae0hfe6f40ecff5ddfbc@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906011555mf106db9rc3944fe7bd94d675@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A24C451.6010301@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:51:20 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906020151r2bc76954t97affdaa237a1d22@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 09:18, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > > Per multiple sources, the most important of
	the obvious reasons expire > > in about three months. > > You guys lost
	me here :) What obvious reasons? :D [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] [WMP] Molobo ban
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0666286019650716142=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.4
X-Spam_score_int: 14
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 09:18, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > > Per multiple sources, the most important of
	the obvious reasons expire > > in about three months. > > You guys lost
	me here :) What obvious reasons? :D [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.7 BAYES_20               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20%
	[score: 0.1135]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0666286019650716142==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7786c8fd735046b59a5a4

--001485f7786c8fd735046b59a5a4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 09:18, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> > Per multiple sources, the most important of the obvious reasons expire
> > in about three months.
>
> You guys lost me here :) What obvious reasons? :D


In this context, the checkuser data.  Checkusers routinely report users who
left more than three months ago as "stale".

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001485f7786c8fd735046b59a5a4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 09:18, Piotr Konieczny <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">&gt; Per multiple sources, the most important of the obvi=
ous reasons expire<br></div><div class=3D"im">
&gt; in about three months.<br>
<br>
</div>You guys lost me here :) What obvious reasons? :D</blockquote><div><b=
r></div><div>In this context, the checkuser data. =C2=A0Checkusers routinel=
y report users who left more than three months ago as &quot;stale&quot;.</d=
iv>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001485f7786c8fd735046b59a5a4--


--===============0666286019650716142==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0666286019650716142==--


