X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 15 12:08:16 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906142348m1fc548bpf49902ca7129225a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <210291.63163.qm@web32806.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<25890ca0906141251g418db961p3fbe520eeffdfb2c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906142348m1fc548bpf49902ca7129225a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:07:55 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0906150307l6a2cfc41g5106b995b5bbd29c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: What do we do when in the middle ages the names were
	rendered in Latin (and not always with the same spelling)? For example, 
	let's take Transylvania. Certainly, when referring to 1867-1918, the
	names would be in Hungarian, and still conceivably going back to maybe
	as early as 1600s. But not before, although I am sure many Hungarians
	would insist using Hungarian names since 896, even before they arrived
	in Transylvania. Several alternatives: Rname (then Uname) Uname (now
	Rname) Rname (then Lname) Lname (now Rname) Rname (then Uname and
	Lname)
	Rname (then also Uname and Lname) Uname (also Lname, now Rname) Uname
	(also Lname and Rname, now Rname) Lname (also Uname, now Rname) Lname
	(also Uname and Rname, now Rname) Rname Uname Lname [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD     BODY: HTML font face is not a word
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] More cabal theory
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7759314878758870906=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  What do we do when in the middle ages the names were
	rendered in Latin (and not always with the same spelling)? For example,
	let's take Transylvania. Certainly, when referring to 1867-1918, the
	names would be in Hungarian, and still conceivably going back to maybe
	as early as 1600s. But not before, although I am sure many Hungarians
	would insist using Hungarian names since 896, even before they arrived
	in Transylvania. Several alternatives: Rname (then Uname) Uname (now
	Rname) Rname (then Lname) Lname (now Rname) Rname (then Uname and Lname)
	Rname (then also Uname and Lname) Uname (also Lname, now Rname) Uname
	(also Lname and Rname, now Rname) Lname (also Uname, now Rname) Lname
	(also Uname and Rname, now Rname) Rname Uname Lname [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0009]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD     BODY: HTML font face is not a word
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7759314878758870906==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5aa6864c3e3046c603b79

--001636c5aa6864c3e3046c603b79
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

What do we do when in the middle ages the names were rendered in Latin (and
not always with the same spelling)?  For example, let's take Transylvania.
Certainly, when referring to 1867-1918, the names would be in Hungarian, an=
d
still conceivably going back to maybe as early as 1600s. But not before,
although I am sure many Hungarians would insist using Hungarian names since
896, even before they arrived in Transylvania.  Several alternatives:
Rname (then Uname)
Uname (now Rname)
Rname (then Lname)
Lname (now Rname)
Rname (then Uname and Lname)
Rname (then also Uname and Lname)
Uname (also Lname, now Rname)
Uname (also Lname and Rname, now Rname)
Lname (also Uname, now Rname)
Lname (also Uname and Rname, now Rname)
Rname
Uname
Lname

Or which names are used when speaking about the Saxon cities in
Transylvania_ It makes more sense to use neither Romanian, nor Hungarian,
but German, for example: Sighi=BAoara - Segesv=E1r - Sch=E4=DFburg. The Lat=
in name
Castrum Sex (city number six) would be unrecongnizable.

Of course, WP naming convention solves the problem for the name of the
article. We are talking here for the usage in the text of other articles.

--001636c5aa6864c3e3046c603b79
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

What do we do when in the middle ages the names were rendered in Latin (and=
 not always with the same spelling)? =A0For example, let&#39;s take Transyl=
vania. Certainly, when referring to 1867-1918, the names would be in Hungar=
ian, and still conceivably going back to maybe as early as 1600s. But not b=
efore, although I am sure many Hungarians would insist using Hungarian name=
s since 896, even before they arrived in Transylvania. =A0Several alternati=
ves:<div>
<br></div><div>Rname (then Uname)</div><div>Uname (now Rname)</div><div><di=
v>Rname (then Lname)</div><div>Lname (now Rname)</div><div><div>Rname (then=
 Uname and Lname)</div><div>Rname (then also Uname and Lname)</div><div>
Uname (also Lname, now Rname)</div></div></div><div><div>Uname (also Lname =
and Rname, now Rname)</div><div><div><div><div>Lname (also Uname, now Rname=
)</div></div></div><div><div>Lname (also Uname and Rname, now Rname)</div>
</div></div></div><div>Rname</div><div>Uname</div><div>Lname</div><div><br>=
</div><div>Or which names are used when speaking about the Saxon cities in =
Transylvania_ It makes more sense to use neither Romanian, nor Hungarian, b=
ut German, for example:=A0Sighi=BAoara -=A0<span class=3D"Apple-style-span"=
 style=3D"font-family: -webkit-sans-serif; font-style: italic; line-height:=
 19px; "><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-style: normal;">Seg=
esv=E1r -=A0</span><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-style: no=
rmal; "><span lang=3D"de">Sch=E4=DFburg. The Latin name Castrum Sex (city n=
umber six) would be unrecongnizable.</span></span></span></div>
<div><font class=3D"Apple-style-span" face=3D"-webkit-sans-serif"><span cla=
ss=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"line-height: 19px;"><br></span></font></di=
v><div><font class=3D"Apple-style-span" face=3D"-webkit-sans-serif"><span c=
lass=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"line-height: 19px;">Of course, WP naming=
 convention solves the problem for the name of the article. We are talking =
here for the usage in the text of other articles.</span></font></div>
<div><br></div>

--001636c5aa6864c3e3046c603b79--


--===============7759314878758870906==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7759314878758870906==--


