X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:23:30 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A3EA461.2050208@post.pl>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3EA461.2050208@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:23:07 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211423x2123ead9v1da04a5fa7e3242c@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Ok,
	let's get this a bit organized: 1. Contact a ArbCom
	clerk and ask about the moving of other admin's comments w/o proving he
	is involved. Would AGK be a good person here? If I do it, I can point
	out that in getting Deacon declared "involved" I followed a formal
	procedure whereas Jeh is doing this unilaterally here. 2. I have less
	experience with ANI threads so probably someone else should file this
	one. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Ok, let's get this a bit organized: 1. Contact a ArbCom
	clerk and ask about the moving of other admin's comments w/o proving he
	is involved. Would AGK be a good person here? If I do it, I can point
	out that in getting Deacon declared "involved" I followed a formal
	procedure whereas Jeh is doing this unilaterally here. 2. I have less
	experience with ANI threads so probably someone else should file this
	one. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Ok, let's get this a bit organized:

1. Contact a ArbCom clerk and ask about the moving of other admin's
comments w/o proving he is involved. Would AGK be a good person here?
If I do it, I can point out that in getting Deacon declared "involved"
I followed a formal procedure whereas Jeh is doing this unilaterally
here.
2. I have less experience with ANI threads so probably someone else
should file this one.

I'll be here for a bit longer so let me know.

Radek


2009/6/21 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> Digwuren wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 23:47, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>
>> It's a clear example of incivility, disrespect for a fellow
>> administrator, and can be painted as a power trip. =A0I think we want a
>> speedy resolution, therefore arbcom is out. =A0AN/I or Jimbo's talkpage?
>
> ANI? Good idea to frame it that he is picking on another admin and thus
> a danger to other admins. I'd suggest one of us in good standing tries
> to start a thread at ANI on that.
>
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

