X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 22 05:08:50 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:08:31 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880906212008y451e7bd5nec82b3ad8db84c96@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Jimbo is no help unless it gets to ArbCom. Would it be
	worth supporting acceptance of the case to review Jehochman's conduct?
	I've alrady written some stuff on the request page, but can withdraw if
	it is not the right way to go. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7293548641869936847=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Jimbo is no help unless it gets to ArbCom. Would it be
	worth supporting acceptance of the case to review Jehochman's conduct?
	I've alrady written some stuff on the request page, but can withdraw if
	it is not the right way to go. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7293548641869936847==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174bdf8a591273046ce730cd

--0015174bdf8a591273046ce730cd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jimbo is no help unless it gets to ArbCom.

Would it be worth supporting acceptance of the case to review Jehochman's
conduct? I've alrady written some stuff on the request page, but can
withdraw if it is not the right way to go.


On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 23:47, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I surprised:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APiotrus&diff=297788006&oldid=297787433
>> I tried talking to him nicely on AE/talk pages, but he replies with
>> this. Should I go to AN, ANI or some ArbCom page to deal with this? Best
>> argument so far is that nobody else criticized my posts and he didn't
>> even cite diffs to what exactly in my posts was unhelpful/inflammatory.
>
>
> It's a clear example of incivility, disrespect for a fellow administrator,
> and can be painted as a power trip.  I think we want a speedy resolution,
> therefore arbcom is out.  AN/I or Jimbo's talkpage?
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0015174bdf8a591273046ce730cd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jimbo is no help unless it gets to ArbCom.<br><br>Would it be worth support=
ing acceptance of the case to review Jehochman&#39;s conduct? I&#39;ve alra=
dy written some stuff on the request page, but can withdraw if it is not th=
e right way to go.<br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Digwure=
n <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmai=
l.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"b=
order-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; paddin=
g-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 23:47,=
 Piotr Konieczny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, =
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

Ok, I surprised:<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3APiotrus&=
amp;diff=3D297788006&amp;oldid=3D297787433" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wik=
ipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3APiotrus&amp;diff=3D297788006&amp=
;oldid=3D297787433</a><br>


I tried talking to him nicely on AE/talk pages, but he replies with<br>
this. Should I go to AN, ANI or some ArbCom page to deal with this? Best<br=
>
argument so far is that nobody else criticized my posts and he didn&#39;t<b=
r>
even cite diffs to what exactly in my posts was unhelpful/inflammatory.</bl=
ockquote><div><br></div></div><div>It&#39;s a clear example of incivility, =
disrespect for a fellow administrator, and can be painted as a power trip. =
=A0I think we want a speedy resolution, therefore arbcom is out. =A0AN/I or=
 Jimbo&#39;s talkpage?</div>

<div><br></div></div><font color=3D"#888888">-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0015174bdf8a591273046ce730cd--


--===============7293548641869936847==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7293548641869936847==--


