X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Feb 15 21:54:34 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <49988125.8080201@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:55:01 -0500
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080829 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <929ed1ec0902150406u38d165e3k959bfb108e80b6e2@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0902151239y68693dcct5a2738f6e5d9a25e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0902151239y68693dcct5a2738f6e5d9a25e@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.2
X-Spam_score_int: -21
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Digwuren wrote: > The block has been overturned via
	AN/I
	consensus, the only opposer being > Jehochman. > > Publically, I plan to
	take the position that this is obviously Jehochman > holding grudge
	against me for voting against him at his (successful) RFA. > >
	Privately, something more complex is going on, and Jehochman may be >
	holding grudge against me since I criticised Bishonen. Some signs also
	>
	indicate that he might be taking sides randomly, or following some sort
	> of "tough on wikicriminals" pattern. > > Either way, I consider
	Jehochman dangerous, and will seek to "poison the > well" re his
	neutrality in a few days. I hope to make it socially > unacceptable for
	him to take administrative actions concerning me in the > future. Ideas
	are welcome, and somebody please support me when the time > arrives --
	because I can't do this alone. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] =?utf-8?q?Nochnoy_Dozor_+_Johan_B=C3=A4ckman_=3D_=3F?=
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > The block has been overturned via AN/I
	consensus, the only opposer being > Jehochman. > > Publically, I plan to
	take the position that this is obviously Jehochman > holding grudge
	against me for voting against him at his (successful) RFA. > >
	Privately, something more complex is going on, and Jehochman may be >
	holding grudge against me since I criticised Bishonen. Some signs also >
	indicate that he might be taking sides randomly, or following some sort
	> of "tough on wikicriminals" pattern. > > Either way, I consider
	Jehochman dangerous, and will seek to "poison the > well" re his
	neutrality in a few days. I hope to make it socially > unacceptable for
	him to take administrative actions concerning me in the > future. Ideas
	are welcome, and somebody please support me when the time > arrives --
	because I can't do this alone. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Digwuren wrote:

> The block has been overturned via AN/I consensus, the only opposer being 
> Jehochman.
> 
> Publically, I plan to take the position that this is obviously Jehochman 
> holding grudge against me for voting against him at his (successful) RFA.
> 
> Privately, something more complex is going on, and Jehochman may be 
> holding grudge against me since I criticised Bishonen.  Some signs also 
> indicate that he might be taking sides randomly, or following some sort 
> of "tough on wikicriminals" pattern.
> 
> Either way, I consider Jehochman dangerous, and will seek to "poison the 
> well" re his neutrality in a few days.  I hope to make it socially 
> unacceptable for him to take administrative actions concerning me in the 
> future.  Ideas are welcome, and somebody please support me when the time 
> arrives -- because I can't do this alone.

Even not knowing him previously I've criticized him on ANI. This should 
be a good start.

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

