X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:32:40 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211430n74ede828t87898697dbadcaa0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3EA461.2050208@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906211423x2123ead9v1da04a5fa7e3242c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211428y5ea28c88wafdde68863c6a2bd@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211430n74ede828t87898697dbadcaa0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:32:30 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906211432i395bb0d1v4ace9d2f4da52cc4@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:30, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > What's your interest in this? I think the
	best theory is that you were > keeping a watch over a fellow Pole's
	talkpage. You shouldn't probably show > active involvement in the
	arbitration case, or it's going to get a lot > muddier. After all, our
	position is that Polish affairs aren't involved in > this case. > [...]
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4447061954806929822=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:30, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > What's your interest in this? I think the
	best theory is that you were > keeping a watch over a fellow Pole's
	talkpage. You shouldn't probably show > active involvement in the
	arbitration case, or it's going to get a lot > muddier. After all, our
	position is that Polish affairs aren't involved in > this case. > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4447061954806929822==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c59825a7fa76046ce27e57

--001636c59825a7fa76046ce27e57
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:30, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> What's your interest in this?  I think the best theory is that you were
> keeping a watch over a fellow Pole's talkpage.  You shouldn't probably show
> active involvement in the arbitration case, or it's going to get a lot
> muddier.  After all, our position is that Polish affairs aren't involved in
> this case.
>

This probably means that unless you've already shown active interest in this
case, you don't know that Jehochman has moved the thread around, so you
can't ask about it.  Let somebody else do it.  Biophys or Miacek, perhaps?

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c59825a7fa76046ce27e57
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:30, Digwuren <span di=
r=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&=
gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 =
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">What&#39;s your interest in th=
is? =C2=A0I think the best theory is that you were keeping a watch over a f=
ellow Pole&#39;s talkpage. =C2=A0You shouldn&#39;t probably show active inv=
olvement in the arbitration case, or it&#39;s going to get a lot muddier. =
=C2=A0After all, our position is that Polish affairs aren&#39;t involved in=
 this case.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This probably means that unless you&=
#39;ve already shown active interest in this case, you don&#39;t know that =
Jehochman has moved the thread around, so you can&#39;t ask about it. =C2=
=A0Let somebody else do it. =C2=A0Biophys or Miacek, perhaps?</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c59825a7fa76046ce27e57--


--===============4447061954806929822==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4447061954806929822==--


