X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 22 06:25:44 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A3F0834.6030406@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:27:32 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880906212008y451e7bd5nec82b3ad8db84c96@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880906212008y451e7bd5nec82b3ad8db84c96@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Martin wrote: > Jimbo is no help unless it gets to
	ArbCom. > > Would it be worth supporting acceptance of the case to
	review > Jehochman's conduct? I've alrady written some stuff on the
	request page,
	> but can withdraw if it is not the right way to go. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Martin wrote: > Jimbo is no help unless it gets to
	ArbCom. > > Would it be worth supporting acceptance of the case to
	review > Jehochman's conduct? I've alrady written some stuff on the
	request page, > but can withdraw if it is not the right way to go. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Martin wrote:
> Jimbo is no help unless it gets to ArbCom.
> 
> Would it be worth supporting acceptance of the case to review 
> Jehochman's conduct? I've alrady written some stuff on the request page, 
> but can withdraw if it is not the right way to go.

It's probably a good idea. Shelly and Durova have replied to me, rather 
supportive, AGK is taking a neutral stance here. Useful quotes from 
Durova's @:

"I think I've warned you about that fellow before?  He's one of the most 
politically minded admins on the site, and he's aligned himself on an 
administrative level with the likes of Irpen, etc., who hate you.

For an example of Jehochman in a nutshell, put it this way: when 
Bishonen tried to indef FT2, in the initial chaos of the aftermath 
Jehochman tried to start an admin board discussion to siteban FT2. 
Sure, the fellow was unpopular.  But sitebanning a sitting arbitrator? 
That was one of the reasons I opened the RFAR request that ended in 
Bishonen's admonishment.

Here's the way Jehochman typically operates: he comes on really strong 
and turns up the heat, and pushes things right up to the brink, and then 
(after the drama has really gotten going) he'll back away and act 
conciliatory.  He'll even do favors for the people he initially 
offended.  If you don't realize it's pattern behavior it seems like the 
fellow is well meaning.  Even true blue.  He's not.

Not worth detailing all the reasons I came to that conclusion.  But 
basically he's one of the most disruptive administrators who hasn't been 
RfC'd yet."

Taking this into consideration, closer (email) cooperation with Durova 
against Jeh seems like a good idea.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

