X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Sep 10 20:18:18 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4AA9392D.1040807@post.pl>
References: <4AA9392D.1040807@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:18:14 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0909101118j50405c3ax7579c3df9a4e179f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Right. Thank you for support! On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at
	1:36 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: > I don't think he has
	a case > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Biophys_reported_by_User:YMB29_.28Result:_.29
	> but he does make a good point about you forgetting to discuss the
	issue > on talk... remember: some discussion is necessary to avoid such
	> accusations. > > -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about
	Wikipedia
	is, that it just works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] [WMP] To Biophys
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5807774509162328926=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Right. Thank you for support! On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at
	1:36 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: > I don't think he has
	a case > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Biophys_reported_by_User:YMB29_.28Result:_.29
	> but he does make a good point about you forgetting to discuss the
	issue > on talk... remember: some discussion is necessary to avoid such
	> accusations. > > -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about Wikipedia
	is, that it just works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5807774509162328926==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d0a3c169f0504733d39ae

--0015175d0a3c169f0504733d39ae
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Right. Thank you for support!


On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> I don't think he has a case
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Biophys_reported_by_User:YMB29_.28Result:_.29
> but he does make a good point about you forgetting to discuss the issue
> on talk... remember: some discussion is necessary to avoid such
> accusations.
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--0015175d0a3c169f0504733d39ae
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Right. Thank you for support!<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu,=
 Sep 10, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Piotr Konieczny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post=
.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-=
left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left=
: 1ex;">
I don&#39;t think he has a case<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeb=
oard/Edit_warring#User:Biophys_reported_by_User:YMB29_.28Result:_.29" targe=
t=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_notic=
eboard/Edit_warring#User:Biophys_reported_by_User:YMB29_.28Result:_.29</a><=
br>

but he does make a good point about you forgetting to discuss the issue<br>
on talk... remember: some discussion is necessary to avoid such accusations=
.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Piotr Konieczny<br>
<br>
&quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=
<br>
theory.&quot;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>

--0015175d0a3c169f0504733d39ae--


--===============5807774509162328926==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5807774509162328926==--


