X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:38:40 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211432i395bb0d1v4ace9d2f4da52cc4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3EA461.2050208@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906211423x2123ead9v1da04a5fa7e3242c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211428y5ea28c88wafdde68863c6a2bd@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211430n74ede828t87898697dbadcaa0@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211432i395bb0d1v4ace9d2f4da52cc4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:38:26 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211438u405219b9se5a775761f8b8a7e@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Right, so I don't think I should ask about the moving
	around of the comments though I can still ask somewhere about the
	warning/"advice" on Piotrus' page if it comes to that. I'll wait and if
	need be ask Tiptoety since "he's been involved before" to take a look
	at Jeh's behavior. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Right, so I don't think I should ask about the moving
	around of the comments though I can still ask somewhere about the
	warning/"advice" on Piotrus' page if it comes to that. I'll wait and if
	need be ask Tiptoety since "he's been involved before" to take a look at
	Jeh's behavior. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Right, so I don't think I should ask about the moving around of the
comments though I can still ask somewhere about the warning/"advice"
on Piotrus' page if it comes to that. I'll wait and if need be ask
Tiptoety since "he's been involved before" to take a look at Jeh's
behavior.

Radek


2009/6/21 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:30, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> What's your interest in this? =A0I think the best theory is that you were
>> keeping a watch over a fellow Pole's talkpage. =A0You shouldn't probably=
 show
>> active involvement in the arbitration case, or it's going to get a lot
>> muddier. =A0After all, our position is that Polish affairs aren't involv=
ed in
>> this case.
>
> This probably means that unless you've already shown active interest in t=
his
> case, you don't know that Jehochman has moved the thread around, so you
> can't ask about it. =A0Let somebody else do it. =A0Biophys or Miacek, per=
haps?
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

