X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jun 27 18:24:54 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A464847.2000703@post.pl>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:26:47 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <c9b.2da820b4.37771938@aol.com>	<929ed1ec0906270015n26713efdy9d48e99eb791eed9@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906270216y52b72c7egca74f99ecc270112@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906270216y52b72c7egca74f99ecc270112@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: radek szulga wrote: > Durova suggested that I file an
	appeal of my restriction on RFAR > (that's this one:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RFAR right?) > which if my final
	appeal to Thorsten (including my argument that it's > best to settle
	this off wiki and avoid large scale drama) doesn't work > is what I'm
	going to do early next week. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Let's give Thatcher some breathing space
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > Durova suggested that I file an
	appeal of my restriction on RFAR > (that's this one:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RFAR right?) > which if my final
	appeal to Thorsten (including my argument that it's > best to settle
	this off wiki and avoid large scale drama) doesn't work > is what I'm
	going to do early next week. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

radek szulga wrote:
> Durova suggested that I file an appeal of my restriction on RFAR
> (that's this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RFAR right?)
> which if my final appeal to Thorsten (including my argument that it's
> best to settle this off wiki and avoid large scale drama) doesn't work
> is what I'm going to do early next week.

I'd think that AE would be the right place for that, not RFAR. You can 
always go to RFAR once AE fails.

I contacted some admins on IRC and they were somewhat supportive, and 
should've contacted Thatcher. If there is no chance in a day or so, we 
can consider starting an AE thread. I'd suggest to look over the draft 
of what Radek wants to post here.

> -to make that appear credible I will have to distance myself from some
> of you and maybe even make some slightly critical remarks. I might say
> something like "...if you compare my clean blog with that of Digwurgen
> (sic) or Passwordname, you'll see that..."

Indeed.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

