X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Apr 30 01:57:53 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0904291634g78c78847hab4f8b35233d4b9c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0904291428y30678c90mea7d88e6b68a8b24@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880904291625y34682ea8g6dcc7bf95a7e53e0@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0904291634g78c78847hab4f8b35233d4b9c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:57:48 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880904291657r4113bfm3d4d9dffd8b8ef45@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Don't know, but it must be better than giving the
	opposition ammunition. Afterall, if the sources do support and confirm
	the viewpoint that the Baltics were occupied as mainstream, what's to
	get hot under the collar over? Some people believe that if their
	opponent gets upset, then it must be due to their argument having less
	substance. That is why people troll prod and poke, to get this reaction.
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Hiberniantears
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.0
X-Spam_score_int: 10
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Don't know, but it must be better than giving the
	opposition ammunition. Afterall, if the sources do support and confirm
	the viewpoint that the Baltics were occupied as mainstream, what's to
	get hot under the collar over? Some people believe that if their
	opponent gets upset, then it must be due to their argument having less
	substance. That is why people troll prod and poke, to get this reaction.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4805]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Don't know, but it must be better than giving the opposition ammunition.

Afterall, if the sources do support and confirm the viewpoint that the
Baltics were occupied as mainstream, what's to get hot under the
collar over? Some people believe that if their opponent gets upset,
then it must be due to their argument having less substance. That is
why people troll prod and poke, to get this reaction.

Martin

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:25, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Patiently explain the need for reliable sources, then requirement for
>> due weight and the problems of OR and synthesis. Pin him down on the
>> need to provide sources to back his view.
>
> Has it ever worked before?  Can such cases be studied?
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

