X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul  4 22:21:12 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A4FBA38.10401@post.pl>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:23:20 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Something to consider in a month or so: Molobo could
	appeal his block to ArbCom. Arguments: * apologize for using a sock to
	avoid 1RR restriction, point out that violations were infrequent and
	your primary motivation was to retire old account, not avoid blocks *
	acknowledge that reverting is your biggest problem and promise to
	adhere
	to 1RR for a year if unbanned * promise not to sock again, of course *
	ask for a mentor * point out that you are a content creator and civil
	discutant at talk, and have a lot of materials to add which you've
	accumulated over the few months of your ban (you can attach a doc with
	some stuff, just to show how you'd benefit the project by quantity)
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM]  Appealing Molobo's block to ArbCom
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Something to consider in a month or so: Molobo could
	appeal his block to ArbCom. Arguments: * apologize for using a sock to
	avoid 1RR restriction, point out that violations were infrequent and
	your primary motivation was to retire old account, not avoid blocks *
	acknowledge that reverting is your biggest problem and promise to adhere
	to 1RR for a year if unbanned * promise not to sock again, of course *
	ask for a mentor * point out that you are a content creator and civil
	discutant at talk, and have a lot of materials to add which you've
	accumulated over the few months of your ban (you can attach a doc with
	some stuff, just to show how you'd benefit the project by quantity)
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Something to consider in a month or so: Molobo could appeal his block to 
ArbCom. Arguments:
* apologize for using a sock to avoid 1RR restriction, point out that 
violations were infrequent and your primary motivation was to retire old 
account, not avoid blocks
* acknowledge that reverting is your biggest problem and promise to 
adhere to 1RR for a year if unbanned
* promise not to sock again, of course
* ask for a mentor
* point out that you are a content creator and civil discutant at talk, 
and have a lot of materials to add which you've accumulated over the few 
months of your ban (you can attach a doc with some stuff, just to show 
how you'd benefit the project by quantity)

Bottom line, appeal to ArbCom cannot hurt you, and may result in unbanning.

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

