X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jan  2 23:19:39 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0901021419k47a5cde3n70f11c71f78d28fa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 00:19:40 +0200
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
In-Reply-To: <495E895C.1070203@post.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <785258.53453.qm@web52507.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
	<9d40e4ef0901020735p2167d7e6q26835a6f941a6a0@mail.gmail.com>
	<9d40e4ef0901021038q3d75d4c8l4fcdb707486052e0@mail.gmail.com>
	<495E8880.8040205@post.pl> <495E895C.1070203@post.pl>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: > > I have a feeling blocking admin didn't even read
	the
	Donald's block log > carefully, as despite its length, he has only two
	real blocks, and only > one of them, from half a year ago, for edit
	warring: > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ADonaldDuck
	> > A good illustration of the theory that the length of your block log
	> MATTERS A LOT. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Can anyone report this guy?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8407291436891666348=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  > > I have a feeling blocking admin didn't even read the
	Donald's block log > carefully, as despite its length, he has only two
	real blocks, and only > one of them, from half a year ago, for edit
	warring: > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ADonaldDuck
	> > A good illustration of the theory that the length of your block log
	> MATTERS A LOT. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8407291436891666348==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_136989_7382826.1230934780221"

------=_Part_136989_7382826.1230934780221
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

>
> I have a feeling blocking admin didn't even read the Donald's block log
> carefully, as despite its length, he has only two real blocks, and only
> one of them, from half a year ago, for edit warring:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ADonaldDuck
>
> A good illustration of the theory that the length of your block log
> MATTERS A LOT.


Furthermore, he may have been swayed by the recent 3RR warning by Hillock
directly above his message -- and that warning, in turn, comes from this
very incident DonaldDuck is getting blocked for.

We might consider adopting as standard tactic the practice that before the
3RR report is filed, somebody else should add a 3RR warning to the user's
talkpage.

That having been said, does anybody else find it amusing that among the
monikers adopted by some of the fiercest fans of USSR are DonaldDuck and
Beatle Fab Four -- references to popular icons from the two world powers
that topped USSR's "potential enemy" list?

-- 
Andres Soolo

------=_Part_136989_7382826.1230934780221
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I have a feeling blocking admin didn&#39;t even read the Donald&#39;s block log<br>
carefully, as despite its length, he has only two real blocks, and only<br>
one of them, from half a year ago, for edit warring:<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&amp;type=block&amp;page=User%3ADonaldDuck" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&amp;type=block&amp;page=User%3ADonaldDuck</a><br>

<br>
A good illustration of the theory that the length of your block log<br>
MATTERS A LOT.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Furthermore, he may have been swayed by the recent 3RR warning by Hillock directly above his message -- and that warning, in turn, comes from this very incident DonaldDuck is getting blocked for.</div>
<div><br></div><div>We might consider adopting as standard tactic the practice that before the 3RR report is filed, somebody else should add a 3RR warning to the user&#39;s talkpage.</div><div><br></div><div>That having been said, does anybody else find it amusing that among the monikers adopted by some of the fiercest fans of USSR are DonaldDuck and Beatle Fab Four -- references to popular icons from the two world powers that topped USSR&#39;s &quot;potential enemy&quot; list?</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

------=_Part_136989_7382826.1230934780221--


--===============8407291436891666348==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8407291436891666348==--


