X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 22:53:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906211337h4be4fa8cm590a56d88be3e8ec@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c39.57b57f3e.376ee266@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906202028s9291ce7webaed4493229aedb@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70906210719u3ac8b9b3l9f28443cce3dabe2@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3E7FEE.8070601@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211212p10320e3cwbfc9bb3780e2a5c3@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211336h47a4185eg660716b7591628f3@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211337h4be4fa8cm590a56d88be3e8ec@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:53:04 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70906211353q5a7f0007o831d41bfbf72dc0@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Jehochmann was already siding with one party here
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Petri_Krohn,
	approving of Ghirla's (!) view, that of Beatle Fab Four
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Petri_Krohn&diff=prev&oldid=139447791,
	posting as ''independent view'' - a lampoon supporting Petr Krohn's
	hooliganism (in 2007!) and whining on Digwuren's ''checkered history''
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=139197103.
	In fact he posted a comment, agreeing with Ghirla's view at a
	noticeboard - G.'s view at the time was that Digwuren should be banned
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=139217687
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Well, there goes another weekend, the latest AE
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Jehochmann was already siding with one party here
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Petri_Krohn,
	approving of Ghirla's (!) view, that of Beatle Fab Four
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Petri_Krohn&diff=prev&oldid=139447791,
	posting as ''independent view'' - a lampoon supporting Petr Krohn's
	hooliganism (in 2007!) and whining on Digwuren's ''checkered history''
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=139197103.
	In fact he posted a comment, agreeing with Ghirla's view at a
	noticeboard - G.'s view at the time was that Digwuren should be banned
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=139217687
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Jehochmann was already siding with one party here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Petri_Krohn,
approving of Ghirla's (!) view, that of Beatle Fab Four
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Requests_for_comment/=
Petri_Krohn&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D139447791,
posting as ''independent view'' - a lampoon supporting Petr Krohn's
hooliganism (in 2007!) and whining on Digwuren's ''checkered history''
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_not=
iceboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D139197103.
In fact he posted a comment, agreeing with Ghirla's view at a
noticeboard - G.'s view at the time was that Digwuren should be banned
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_not=
iceboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D139217687

He has to be rather impudent so as to play the role of an uninvolved
sysop now, two years later.

M.





On 21/06/2009, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
> It might also be a good idea to challenge this whole notion of
> uninvolved/involved - who gets to decide? The cost of course is that
> it amps up the dramu.
>
> Radek
>
>
> 2009/6/21 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>:
>> Given the latest moving around of Piotrus' edits
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Reques=
ts/Enforcement&curid=3D12936136&diff=3D297786750&oldid=3D297786362
>> =A0and Jehochman's statement that "Digwuren is one of the most warned
>> and sanctioned editors on Wikipedia. They do not need any more chances
>> to reform. " (which is obviously false - and it betrays his prejudices
>> here) I think it's probably time to start questioning his
>> "uninvolvedness" as well.
>>
>> It'd be useful to back track it to where it originated from which I
>> think someone already mentioned.
>>
>> Radek
>>
>>
>> 2009/6/21 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 21:46, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If Deacon chimes in with his "Piotrus is allied to Baltics due to
>>>> Irpen-hate", one can simply point out that he is assuming bad faith he=
re
>>>> and that he is certainly involved and biased when it comes to anything
>>>> Piotrus-related :)
>>>
>>> And that there is no Irpen.
>>> --
>>> Andres Soolo
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

