X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Mar 31 21:37:56 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <49D27140.9020506@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:38:40 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <929ed1ec0903310210n13f77c97p4f2a3800643e2ef4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0903310210n13f77c97p4f2a3800643e2ef4@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that the >
	<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Historical_revisionism_(political)>
	> doesn't have a lot of articles in it, and there are relatively few >
	persons. Would it make sense to create a navigation box on historical >
	revisionists? > > And would we be able to defend it against the Cartel?
	> > An important but not immediately obvious result of such a template
	-- if > we could make it stick -- would be that due to the connecting
	links, > Google would begin associating Bäckman and Dyukov with the
	well-known > historical revisionists such as Miguel Serrano, David
	Irving, and Harry > Barnes. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Historical revisionists navibox?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that the >
	<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Historical_revisionism_(political)>
	> doesn't have a lot of articles in it, and there are relatively few >
	persons. Would it make sense to create a navigation box on historical >
	revisionists? > > And would we be able to defend it against the Cartel?
	> > An important but not immediately obvious result of such a template
	-- if > we could make it stick -- would be that due to the connecting
	links, > Google would begin associating Bäckman and Dyukov with the
	well-known > historical revisionists such as Miguel Serrano, David
	Irving, and Harry > Barnes. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 MIME_BASE64_NO_NAME    RAW: base64 attachment does not have a file name
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
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