X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jul  1 13:21:20 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906291324m488bdf60l2e64cbb8faae4b41@mail.gmail.com>
References: <494251.20348.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0906291324m488bdf60l2e64cbb8faae4b41@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:21:07 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70907010421i43e4392bx5d0abce951d6c4c8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.6
X-Spam_score_int: -25
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Are you now referring to the illustrious rate.ee? :-DD
	M. > While the exact behaviour patterns vary from society to > society, 
	they may be rather discriminatory, and I know several people who > are
	female in real life but as a matter of habit use male personas online
	so
	> as to ward off unwarranted attention. One of them makes an exception
	for a > certain well-known Estonian dating site; the other ones don't
	use well-known > dating sites as far as I know. The fact that they
	happen to be in stable > relations may factor into it. > > Bishonen
	falls to the other extreme. > > -- > Andres Soolo > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Women and Wiklp
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -1.4
X-Spam_score_int: -13
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Are you now referring to the illustrious rate.ee? :-DD
	M. > While the exact behaviour patterns vary from society to > society,
	they may be rather discriminatory, and I know several people who > are
	female in real life but as a matter of habit use male personas online so
	> as to ward off unwarranted attention. One of them makes an exception
	for a > certain well-known Estonian dating site; the other ones don't
	use well-known > dating sites as far as I know. The fact that they
	happen to be in stable > relations may factor into it. > > Bishonen
	falls to the other extreme. > > -- > Andres Soolo > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-1.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 MIME_BASE64_NO_NAME    RAW: base64 attachment does not have a file name
	1.9 MIME_BASE64_TEXT       RAW: Message text disguised using base64 encoding
	-0.9 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
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