X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Apr  2 22:39:57 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <49D522DA.805@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:40:58 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <929ed1ec0904020150l361343dw20bcb580151dc665@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0904020150l361343dw20bcb580151dc665@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -1.4
X-Spam_score_int: -13
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > Hi, > > by now, it's intuitively
	obvious that the anonymous address on Bäckman's > article is probably
	Bäckman himself. But can we conclusively demonstrate > it, based on
	evidence rather than intuition? > > When [[Rein Lang]]'s assistant
	showed up at his article to delete stuff > he didn't like, it became
	news. The anonymous address has not only > deleted stuff; it has also
	issued rather questionable statements -- if > we could get real evidence
	of its connections to Bäckman, we could get > the press to report on
	it, and then we could quote the press in the > article. This, in turn,
	would likely lead to many further press mentions > of Bäckman quote
	Wikipedia about Bäckman's actions on Wikipedia when > giving a
	background of Bäckman, which seems to work in our favour. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-1.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	-0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM]
 =?utf-8?q?Can_we_show_that_the_anonymous_address_is_probabl?=
 =?utf-8?b?eSBCw6Rja21hbj8=?=
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -1.2
X-Spam_score_int: -11
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > Hi, > > by now, it's intuitively
	obvious that the anonymous address on Bäckman's > article is probably
	Bäckman himself. But can we conclusively demonstrate > it, based on
	evidence rather than intuition? > > When [[Rein Lang]]'s assistant
	showed up at his article to delete stuff > he didn't like, it became
	news. The anonymous address has not only > deleted stuff; it has also
	issued rather questionable statements -- if > we could get real evidence
	of its connections to Bäckman, we could get > the press to report on
	it, and then we could quote the press in the > article. This, in turn,
	would likely lead to many further press mentions > of Bäckman quote
	Wikipedia about Bäckman's actions on Wikipedia when > giving a
	background of Bäckman, which seems to work in our favour. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-1.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 MIME_BASE64_NO_NAME    RAW: base64 attachment does not have a file name
	-0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
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