X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul  3 20:27:09 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <470075.43344.qm@web45106.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
References: <470075.43344.qm@web45106.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 20:26:46 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0907031126m17b6a9d6g63c796fec08fb9ef@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: While we know for example Lossmark attitude to German
	history, we have no knowledge of hist attitude to Soviet one. Just a
	point. Also-call me paranoid, but I have certain reserve to people who
	suddenly appeared during the show made by Scinurea against me. Did you
	noticed sudden activity in recent days of Adjustshift on German issues
	and his pro-German rants ? Doesn't seem he was as neutral as claimed...
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Outside users, potential allies and Loosmark
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  While we know for example Lossmark attitude to German
	history, we have no knowledge of hist attitude to Soviet one. Just a
	point. Also-call me paranoid, but I have certain reserve to people who
	suddenly appeared during the show made by Scinurea against me. Did you
	noticed sudden activity in recent days of Adjustshift on German issues
	and his pro-German rants ? Doesn't seem he was as neutral as claimed...
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

While we know for example Lossmark attitude to German history, we have
no knowledge of hist attitude to Soviet one. Just a point.

Also-call me paranoid, but I have certain reserve to people who
suddenly appeared during the show made by Scinurea against me. Did you
noticed sudden activity in recent days of Adjustshift on German issues
and his pro-German rants ? Doesn't seem he was as neutral as
claimed...

2009/7/3 Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>:
> You are right, we should keep supporting Lossmark and see what happens.
> People have to be %100 trusted to be here.
> P.S.
> I just posted this on Thatcher's page because he pissed me off.....(sorry
> for my language) His decisions to punish everybody like a machine gun are
> stupid. I'm wondering what will he say...most likely please apeal BS.
> --- On Thu, 7/2/09, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
> Subject: [WPM] Outside users, potential allies
> To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
> Date: Thursday, July 2, 2009, 2:04 PM
>
> Has anyone had any dealings with the user Yopie?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yopie
> I've alerted him once or twice when the usual German suspects and/or anon
> was doing the same thing to Czech/Slovak-German articles that they do to
> Polish-German articles and he was pretty good with taking care of it. In
> some strange connection, Dr. Dan also tried to stir up some Czechs vs. Poles
> trouble with the usual Cieszyn/Zaolzie issue recently and as far as I could
> tell Yopie didn't take the bait (funny how only Soviet and German (Dr. Dan
> is neither but he'll reflexively support anyone who's anti-Polish) editors
> bring it up, while I've never seen a Czech or a Slovak give a shit about
> it).
> I don't think that at this point he's someone we should invite to join us
> but I think we should watch him as a potential ally (he's pretty anti-commie
> too) and maybe try to establish some weak connections with him (watch the
> pages he edits, occasionally throw in a supportive edit, if he gets in a
> dispute on a talk page support him etc) and see how it turns out.
>
> Also, just for the record at this time I'd be against asking Loosemark to
> join. Support him, yes, and keep talking to him, but I'd hold off on
> anything more than that.
>
> Radek
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

