X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jun  4 19:15:35 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A2780E5.7080709@post.pl>
References: <4A2625B5.7010705@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906030113r295a1e3as1452b924a5f7a55f@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906031153u6f231517n51cd4e0f21aec4fb@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A26ED7C.80705@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906031456u415cb794w9908c88da07ac212@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2780E5.7080709@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:15:19 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0906041015k3c5635a5ufd7955a5573b218f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I asked Woogie and he agreed, but he wants first to
	build a consensus with other editors interested in the case. 2009/6/4
	Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> > radek szulga wrote: > > Yeah, I can
	file the one for Kurfurst as a sort of a test case. My > > main worry
	is
	that if I file these sooner or later, Sandstein, or some > > other
	involved admin, is going to decide that I need to be placed on > >
	notice too - and I like my (limited) "get out of jail free" card. > >
	It
	will also be interesting to see who shows up for Kurfurst (if > >
	Deacon
	makes a few more remarks and Matthead decides to chime it ... > > ahhh, 
	that'd be a trifecta). > > You cannot be placed on those unless you do
	something bad. Filing an AE > case is fine till admins start warning
	you
	that your cases have no > merit. As long as they do, and I think we are
	wise enough not to spam AE > with pointless cases, we should be fine. >
	> I suggest we review AE drafts here before we send them in. And I
	think
	> we should rescue the Skapperod's RfC drafted by Molobo. It has
	potential > to do some good. Molobo, have you talked to Woogie as I
	suggested and > asked him if he would be willing to start it? > > -- >
	Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny |||____ __ __ >
	I=I====__|_|I__I=>
	> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here." ||| > "Initiating 'getting the
	hell out of here' maneuver." > -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The
	Hour of the Wolf" > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list >
	folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Taking on Deacon
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1213188859602787189=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I asked Woogie and he agreed, but he wants first to
	build a consensus with other editors interested in the case. 2009/6/4
	Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> > radek szulga wrote: > > Yeah, I can
	file the one for Kurfurst as a sort of a test case. My > > main worry is
	that if I file these sooner or later, Sandstein, or some > > other
	involved admin, is going to decide that I need to be placed on > >
	notice too - and I like my (limited) "get out of jail free" card. > > It
	will also be interesting to see who shows up for Kurfurst (if > > Deacon
	makes a few more remarks and Matthead decides to chime it ... > > ahhh,
	that'd be a trifecta). > > You cannot be placed on those unless you do
	something bad. Filing an AE > case is fine till admins start warning you
	that your cases have no > merit. As long as they do, and I think we are
	wise enough not to spam AE > with pointless cases, we should be fine. >
	> I suggest we review AE drafts here before we send them in. And I think
	> we should rescue the Skapperod's RfC drafted by Molobo. It has
	potential > to do some good. Molobo, have you talked to Woogie as I
	suggested and > asked him if he would be willing to start it? > > -- >
	Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny |||____ __ __ > I=I====__|_|I__I=>
	> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here." ||| > "Initiating 'getting the
	hell out of here' maneuver." > -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The
	Hour of the Wolf" > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list >
	folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1213188859602787189==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd304709d737a046b88eb6f

--000e0cd304709d737a046b88eb6f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I asked Woogie and he agreed, but he wants first to build a consensus with
other editors interested in the case.

2009/6/4 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>

> radek szulga wrote:
> > Yeah, I can file the one for Kurfurst as a sort of a test case. My
> > main worry is that if I file these sooner or later, Sandstein, or some
> > other involved admin, is going to decide that I need to be placed on
> > notice too - and I like my (limited) "get out of jail free" card.
> > It will also be interesting to see who shows up for Kurfurst (if
> > Deacon makes a few more remarks and Matthead decides to chime it ...
> > ahhh, that'd be a trifecta).
>
> You cannot be placed on those unless you do something bad. Filing an AE
> case is fine till admins start warning you that your cases have no
> merit. As long as they do, and I think we are wise enough not to spam AE
> with pointless cases, we should be fine.
>
> I suggest we review AE drafts here before we send them in. And I think
> we should rescue the Skapperod's RfC drafted by Molobo. It has potential
> to do some good. Molobo, have you talked to Woogie as I suggested and
> asked him if he would be willing to start it?
>
> --
> Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
>                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
> "Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
> "Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
>  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--000e0cd304709d737a046b88eb6f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I asked Woogie and he agreed, but he wants first to build a consensus with =
other editors interested in the case.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">200=
9/6/4 Piotr Konieczny <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span><br><b=
lockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 20=
4, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">radek szulga wrote:<br>
&gt; Yeah, I can file the one for Kurfurst as a sort of a test case. My<br>
&gt; main worry is that if I file these sooner or later, Sandstein, or some=
<br>
&gt; other involved admin, is going to decide that I need to be placed on<b=
r>
&gt; notice too - and I like my (limited) &quot;get out of jail free&quot; =
card.<br>
&gt; It will also be interesting to see who shows up for Kurfurst (if<br>
&gt; Deacon makes a few more remarks and Matthead decides to chime it ...<b=
r>
&gt; ahhh, that&#39;d be a trifecta).<br>
<br>
</div>You cannot be placed on those unless you do something bad. Filing an =
AE<br>
case is fine till admins start warning you that your cases have no<br>
merit. As long as they do, and I think we are wise enough not to spam AE<br=
>
with pointless cases, we should be fine.<br>
<br>
I suggest we review AE drafts here before we send them in. And I think<br>
we should rescue the Skapperod&#39;s RfC drafted by Molobo. It has potentia=
l<br>
to do some good. Molobo, have you talked to Woogie as I suggested and<br>
asked him if he would be willing to start it?<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Koniec=
zny =A0 =A0 =A0 |||____ =A0__ __<br>
 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D&gt;<br>
&quot;Lennier, get us the hell out of here.&quot; =A0 =A0 |||<br>
&quot;Initiating &#39;getting the hell out of here&#39; maneuver.&quot;<br>
 =A0-- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:&quot;The Hour of the Wolf&quot;<br=
>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--000e0cd304709d737a046b88eb6f--


--===============1213188859602787189==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1213188859602787189==--


