X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 19 13:13:11 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906190014k624acd6as6a0793df5398e54d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181257q5ee1749ap4872a277af9b7a6f@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906181304x6fab2980se600cc88f41aaaf8@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181350i5fbd4cc9u41114510a11eab2@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181358tec27236w5a3ad45a11e02432@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190014k624acd6as6a0793df5398e54d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:12:54 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906190412i80309d6kf23d7967fc7b8764@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:14, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > I was having in mind something like
	writing on Sandstein's (or another > administrator's) talkpage
	something
	like this: > I did it, since nobody suggested anything better. It might
	help, but I guess it's not guaranteed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4821899757487938203=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:14, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > I was having in mind something like
	writing on Sandstein's (or another > administrator's) talkpage something
	like this: > I did it, since nobody suggested anything better. It might
	help, but I guess it's not guaranteed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4821899757487938203==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b7c624dded046cb19b71

--001636c5b7c624dded046cb19b71
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:14, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was having in mind something like writing on Sandstein's (or another
> administrator's) talkpage something like this:
>

I did it, since nobody suggested anything better.  It might help, but I
guess it's not guaranteed.

Also, please do try to soup up the dramu, as Piotrus suggested.  The point
is to demonstrate that as a vexatious litigator, Offliner has generated
dramu-prone meritless two requests that are very complicated to handle
properly.  Unfortunately, I can't help without seeming like developing a
battlefield. :/  It might be that Biophys should stay away, too.

It's probably useful to explain some of the silliest diffs Offliner proposed
in both cases, and discuss thoroughly why they're silly.  Don't forget to
repeatedly refer to Offliner's earlier meritless cases.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5b7c624dded046cb19b71
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:14, Digwuren <span di=
r=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&=
gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left=
: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1e=
x;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>I was having in mind something like writing=
 on Sandstein&#39;s (or another administrator&#39;s) talkpage something lik=
e this:</div></div></blockquote><div><br>I did it, since nobody suggested a=
nything better.=C2=A0 It might help, but I guess it&#39;s not guaranteed.<b=
r>
</div></div><br>Also, please do try to soup up the dramu, as Piotrus sugges=
ted.=C2=A0 The point is to demonstrate that as a vexatious litigator, Offli=
ner has generated dramu-prone meritless two requests that are very complica=
ted to handle properly.=C2=A0 Unfortunately, I can&#39;t help without seemi=
ng like developing a battlefield. :/=C2=A0 It might be that Biophys should =
stay away, too.<br>
<br>It&#39;s probably useful to explain some of the silliest diffs Offliner=
 proposed in both cases, and discuss thoroughly why they&#39;re silly.=C2=
=A0 Don&#39;t forget to repeatedly refer to Offliner&#39;s earlier meritles=
s cases.<br>
<br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5b7c624dded046cb19b71--


--===============4821899757487938203==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4821899757487938203==--


