X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Apr 30 09:25:28 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f826636f0904300004s3e73ce56te5a21eac99c140e4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <226476.72978.qm@web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<c3b2b3db0904271114y495f9b0dl1328b86a07723d9f@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0904271358r8c08b23ifc2991dde9e442c6@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0904271410w78ed56bbh730525025f0dccd4@mail.gmail.com>
	<f826636f0904290349r36789aedtb22a0243b6aed2a3@mail.gmail.com>
	<49F8A679.4060105@post.pl>
	<f826636f0904300004s3e73ce56te5a21eac99c140e4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:25:11 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0904300025g42b53db8l94680b5fba0c180f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:04, Dorin Cheptea
	<dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>wrote: > Exactly. If we can simply outperform
	them... Plus publically demand >> accountability every time they cross
	the line. > > Does not work. They'll claim that the constant demands of
	accountability for the constant line-crossings are harassment, and there
	will be enough active fools in the public to support this view. We've
	seen it before. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5254797631321520385=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.8
X-Spam_score_int: 18
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:04, Dorin Cheptea
	<dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>wrote: > Exactly. If we can simply outperform
	them... Plus publically demand >> accountability every time they cross
	the line. > > Does not work. They'll claim that the constant demands of
	accountability for the constant line-crossings are harassment, and there
	will be enough active fools in the public to support this view. We've
	seen it before. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-0.2 BAYES_40               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40%
	[score: 0.3900]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5254797631321520385==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485ecf70aac822e0468c09808

--001485ecf70aac822e0468c09808
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:04, Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>wrote:

> Exactly. If we can simply outperform them... Plus publically demand
>> accountability every time they cross the line.
>
>
Does not work.  They'll claim that the constant demands of accountability
for the constant line-crossings are harassment, and there will be enough
active fools in the public to support this view.  We've seen it before.

If to them this would look as attacks, but not to us and to the rest of the
>> community, the better. (Because they would get radicalized and make more
>> mistakes, while we can keep cool head and have the community on our side.)
>
>
The community is not a monolith.  It has a lot of views, but in Wikipedia,
the moderates tend to, well, moderate themselves, and the fringes dominate
most dramu-prone discussions.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001485ecf70aac822e0468c09808
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:04, Dorin Cheptea <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:dorin.cheptea@gmail.com">dorin.cheptea=
@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"padding-left:1ex;margin:0px 0px =
0px 0.8ex;border-left:#ccc 1px solid">Exactly. If we can simply outperform =
them... Plus publically demand accountability every time they cross the lin=
e.</blockquote>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Does not work. =C2=A0They&#39;=
ll claim that the constant demands of accountability for the constant line-=
crossings are harassment, and there will be enough active fools in the publ=
ic to support this view. =C2=A0We&#39;ve seen it before.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><=
div class=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"padding-left:1e=
x;margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:#ccc 1px solid">
If=C2=A0to them this would look as attacks, but not to us and to the rest o=
f the community, the better. (Because they would get radicalized and make m=
ore mistakes, while we can keep cool head and have the community on our sid=
e.)</blockquote>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The community is not a monolit=
h. =C2=A0It has a lot of views, but in Wikipedia, the moderates tend to, we=
ll, moderate themselves, and the fringes dominate most dramu-prone discussi=
ons.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001485ecf70aac822e0468c09808--


--===============5254797631321520385==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5254797631321520385==--


