X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Aug 22 20:56:30 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
From: PetersJV@aol.com
Message-ID: <bc6.4ef0a4e0.37c19949@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:56:09 EDT
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5377
X-AOL-SENDER: PetersJV@aol.com
X-Spam_score: -1.0
X-Spam_score_int: -9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  In a message dated 8/22/2009 1:19:25 P.M. Eastern
	Daylight Time, digwuren@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 19:25,
	Jack <_jacurek@yahoo.com_ (mailto:jacurek@yahoo.com) > wrote: What's up
	with PU report?? No admin. fellow wants to touch it fearing
	"fireworks"?:) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-1.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.0 NO_REAL_NAME           From: does not include a real name
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
	NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] What's up with PU report??
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9021095353593560130=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -1.0
X-Spam_score_int: -9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  In a message dated 8/22/2009 1:19:25 P.M. Eastern
	Daylight Time, digwuren@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 19:25,
	Jack <_jacurek@yahoo.com_ (mailto:jacurek@yahoo.com) > wrote: What's up
	with PU report?? No admin. fellow wants to touch it fearing
	"fireworks"?:) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-1.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.0 NO_REAL_NAME           From: does not include a real name
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============9021095353593560130==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1250967369"


-------------------------------1250967369
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 
In a message dated 8/22/2009 1:19:25 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
digwuren@gmail.com writes:

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 19:25, Jack <_jacurek@yahoo.com_ 
(mailto:jacurek@yahoo.com) > wrote:

What's up with PU report?? No admin. fellow wants to touch it  fearing 
"fireworks"?:)



Pretty much.  Why risk getting involved in a complex case if you can  just 
as easily go and ban three obvious vandals?  Simpler to do, greater  benefit.




_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_w
arring#User:PasswordUsername_reported_by_User:jacurek_.28Result:_.29_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring/l
User:PasswordUsername_reported_by_User:jacurek_.28Result:_.29) 
It is long overdue. Can report as such get ignored and forgotten  ?



Yes.  It's called "stale".  Nowadays, it's automated by the  archival bot; 
see 
<_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive107#User:PasswordUsername_reported_by_User:jacurek_.28Result:_.29_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RRArchiv
e107#User:PasswordUsername_reported_by_User:jacurek_.28Result:_.29) >.



-- 
Andres Soolo



I started writing up PU's new strategy, for example, neo-Stalinism, where  
it's a combination of edit warring and inappropriate interpretation of 
sources  to create content which guts an article from the inside. Much more 
creative than  AfDs. Don't know if it's worth it at this point or save for a 
rainy day when I  can find another example.
/Peters

-------------------------------1250967369
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16850" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=3Drole_body style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY=
: Arial"=20
bottomMargin=3D7 leftMargin=3D7 topMargin=3D7 rightMargin=3D7><FONT id=3Dr=
ole_document=20
face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 8/22/2009 1:19:25 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,=20
digwuren@gmail.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"=
><FONT=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 siz=
e=3D2>
  <DIV class=3Dgmail_quote>On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 19:25, Jack <SPAN=20
  dir=3Dltr>&lt;<A title=3Dmailto:jacurek@yahoo.com=20
  href=3D"mailto:jacurek@yahoo.com">jacurek@yahoo.com</A>&gt;</SPAN> wrote=
:<BR>
  <BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dgmail_quote=20
  style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc=
 1px solid">
    <TABLE cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D0 border=3D0>
      <TBODY>
      <TR>
        <TD vAlign=3Dtop>
          <DIV>What's up with PU report?? No admin. fellow wants to touch=
 it=20
          fearing "fireworks"?:)</DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></BLOCKQUO=
TE>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV>Pretty much. &nbsp;Why risk getting involved in a complex case if=
 you can=20
  just as easily go and ban three obvious vandals? &nbsp;Simpler to do, gr=
eater=20
  benefit.</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dgmail_quote=20
  style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc=
 1px solid">
    <TABLE cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D0 border=3D0>
      <TBODY>
      <TR>
        <TD vAlign=3Dtop>
          <DIV></DIV>
          <DIV><A=20
          title=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_=
noticeboard/Edit_warring/lUser:PasswordUsername_reported_by_User:jacurek_.=
28Result:_.29"=20
          href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27=
_noticeboard/Edit_warring/lUser:PasswordUsername_reported_by_User:jacurek_=
.28Result:_.29"=20
          target=3D_blank><U><FONT=20
          color=3D#0000ff>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administr=
ators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:PasswordUsername_reported_by_User:j=
acurek_.28Result:_.29</FONT></U></A></DIV>
          <DIV>It is long overdue. Can report as such get ignored and forg=
otten=20
          ?</DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></BLOCKQUOTE>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV>Yes. &nbsp;It's called "stale". &nbsp;Nowadays, it's automated by=
 the=20
  archival bot; see &lt;<A=20
  title=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticebo=
ard/3RRArchive107#User:PasswordUsername_reported_by_User:jacurek_.28Result=
:_.29"=20
  href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeb=
oard/3RRArchive107#User:PasswordUsername_reported_by_User:jacurek_.28Resul=
t:_.29">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboa=
rd/3RRArchive107#User:PasswordUsername_reported_by_User:jacurek_.28Result:=
_.29</A>&gt;.</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV></DIV>-- <BR>Andres Soolo<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>I started writing up PU's new strategy, for example, neo-Stalinism,=
 where=20
it's a combination of edit warring and inappropriate interpretation of sou=
rces=20
to create content which guts an article from the inside. Much more creativ=
e than=20
AfDs. Don't know if it's worth it at this point or save for a rainy day wh=
en I=20
can find another example.</DIV>
<DIV>/Peters</DIV></FONT><DIV CLASS=3D"aol_ad_footer" ID=3D"2dd1bc257f751c=
d8e296b91cb14b8b85"><br/><font style=3D"color:black;font:normal 10pt arial=
,san-serif;"> <hr style=3D"margin-top:10px"/></font></DIV></BODY></HTML>

-------------------------------1250967369--


--===============9021095353593560130==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============9021095353593560130==--


