X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul  3 01:47:34 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A4D4799.3020905@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:49:45 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <25890ca0907021504w7ad77295kf4470437692e4487@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0907021504w7ad77295kf4470437692e4487@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: radek szulga wrote: > Has anyone had any dealings with
	the user Yopie? > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yopie > I've
	alerted
	him once or twice when the usual German suspects and/or > anon was
	doing
	the same thing to Czech/Slovak-German articles that they > do to
	Polish-German articles and he was pretty good with taking care of > it.
	In some strange connection, Dr. Dan also tried to stir up some > Czechs
	vs. Poles trouble with the usual Cieszyn/Zaolzie issue recently > and
	as
	far as I could tell Yopie didn't take the bait (funny how only > Soviet
	and German (Dr. Dan is neither but he'll reflexively support > anyone
	who's anti-Polish) editors bring it up, while I've never seen a > Czech
	or a Slovak give a shit about it). > I don't think that at this point
	he's someone we should invite to join > us but I think we should watch
	him as a potential ally (he's pretty > anti-commie too) and maybe try
	to
	establish some weak connections with > him (watch the pages he edits,
	occasionally throw in a supportive edit, > if he gets in a dispute on a
	talk page support him etc) and see how it > turns out. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Outside users, potential allies
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > Has anyone had any dealings with
	the user Yopie? > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yopie > I've alerted
	him once or twice when the usual German suspects and/or > anon was doing
	the same thing to Czech/Slovak-German articles that they > do to
	Polish-German articles and he was pretty good with taking care of > it.
	In some strange connection, Dr. Dan also tried to stir up some > Czechs
	vs. Poles trouble with the usual Cieszyn/Zaolzie issue recently > and as
	far as I could tell Yopie didn't take the bait (funny how only > Soviet
	and German (Dr. Dan is neither but he'll reflexively support > anyone
	who's anti-Polish) editors bring it up, while I've never seen a > Czech
	or a Slovak give a shit about it). > I don't think that at this point
	he's someone we should invite to join > us but I think we should watch
	him as a potential ally (he's pretty > anti-commie too) and maybe try to
	establish some weak connections with > him (watch the pages he edits,
	occasionally throw in a supportive edit, > if he gets in a dispute on a
	talk page support him etc) and see how it > turns out. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

radek szulga wrote:
> Has anyone had any dealings with the user Yopie? 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yopie
> I've alerted him once or twice when the usual German suspects and/or 
> anon was doing the same thing to Czech/Slovak-German articles that they 
> do to Polish-German articles and he was pretty good with taking care of 
> it. In some strange connection, Dr. Dan also tried to stir up some 
> Czechs vs. Poles trouble with the usual Cieszyn/Zaolzie issue recently 
> and as far as I could tell Yopie didn't take the bait (funny how only 
> Soviet and German (Dr. Dan is neither but he'll reflexively support 
> anyone who's anti-Polish) editors bring it up, while I've never seen a 
> Czech or a Slovak give a shit about it).
> I don't think that at this point he's someone we should invite to join 
> us but I think we should watch him as a potential ally (he's pretty 
> anti-commie too) and maybe try to establish some weak connections with 
> him (watch the pages he edits, occasionally throw in a supportive edit, 
> if he gets in a dispute on a talk page support him etc) and see how it 
> turns out.

I vaguely recall that Yopie was involved in some problematic editing on 
Zaolzie. Check this page history and talk to Darwinek before inviting him.

Incidentally, I wonder if we could make Darwinek our ally again. He was 
an active member of our Polish group till he got desysoped; I helped him 
get resysoped but since then he decided to stop being involved in all 
controversial editing :(

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

