X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 00:45:37 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0906201534r47afe489ie1755965e4a8e141@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c9b.2cd42f08.376e6e7c@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906201400p2bbacbct3bdd67727ef83080@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906201452s1db82bc7o889e274d1b3cf5bb@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906201534r47afe489ie1755965e4a8e141@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:45:26 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906201545w656f42e8y2e0168b35c9d087e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 01:34, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > J. refers to the warning he gave us
	during my failed Russavia AE request. > But in fact, J simply does not
	like us. This appears to be the case. If we're going to build a case
	that he's not neutral, do we have anything else to go by besides the
	trail from my oppose on his RFA and his sole vote in support of William
	M. Connolley's mistaken (he admitted it himself) block of me? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Well, there goes another weekend, the latest AE
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2108665257282234489=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 01:34, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > J. refers to the warning he gave us
	during my failed Russavia AE request. > But in fact, J simply does not
	like us. This appears to be the case. If we're going to build a case
	that he's not neutral, do we have anything else to go by besides the
	trail from my oppose on his RFA and his sole vote in support of William
	M. Connolley's mistaken (he admitted it himself) block of me? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2108665257282234489==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502bad0b90bdf046ccf6523

--00504502bad0b90bdf046ccf6523
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 01:34, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:

> J. refers to the warning he gave us  during my failed Russavia AE request.
> But in fact, J simply does not like us.


This appears to be the case.  If we're going to build a case that he's not
neutral, do we have anything else to go by besides the trail from my oppose
on his RFA and his sole vote in support of William M. Connolley's mistaken
(he admitted it himself) block of me?

Actually, I'm starting to suspect that Jehochman is either a very, very
devoted follower of Eris, or just unstable.  In other topics, too, it has
seemed to me as though he consistently goes for simple, plausible-looking
and dramu-maximising decisions, actual issues notwithstanding.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--00504502bad0b90bdf046ccf6523
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 01:34, Andrei Dombay <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com">wikibiophys@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
J. refers to the warning he gave us=C2=A0 during my failed Russavia AE requ=
est. But in fact, J simply does not like us.</blockquote><div><br></div><di=
v>This appears to be the case. =C2=A0If we&#39;re going to build a case tha=
t he&#39;s not neutral, do we have anything else to go by besides the trail=
 from my oppose on his RFA and his sole vote in support of William M. Conno=
lley&#39;s mistaken (he admitted it himself) block of me?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Actually, I&#39;m starting to suspect that Jehochman is=
 either a very, very devoted follower of Eris, or just unstable. =C2=A0In o=
ther topics, too, it has seemed to me as though he consistently goes for si=
mple, plausible-looking and dramu-maximising decisions, actual issues notwi=
thstanding.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--00504502bad0b90bdf046ccf6523--


--===============2108665257282234489==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2108665257282234489==--


