X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 15 04:37:34 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c51.50215b5d.3766fb5f@aol.com>
References: <c51.50215b5d.3766fb5f@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:37:11 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0906141937n1a9666dfua61518f5817251df@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Agree. That is precisely what Irpen usually did. On
	Sun, 
	Jun 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote: > In a message dated
	6/14/2009 9:09:51 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > wikibiophys@gmail.com
	writes: > > Who said two reverts a days would be fine? Looking at this
	> > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Result_concerning_Shotlandiya
	> > it's clear he can block anyone for a couple of poorly justified
	reverts > made in different articles > a few months ago. Following this
	way may lead to everyone on all sides > being restricted. > > I think
	what made the difference on Aaviksoo was (fortunately, not taking >
	credit) that I had already requested discussion of the perceived WP:BLP
	> violation and those requests for discussion were ignored. The lesson
	here is > to > > 1. make the request to discuss and not revert back to
	their offending > content > 2. clearly state why the content was
	inappropriate > 3. then, and only then, make the revert of their content
	> > ...and repeat the request each time. > > /Peters > > > Choose the
	home loan that saves you the most $$$. Agents available at >
	ditech.com<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221374924x1201371434/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fclk.atdmt.com%2FDEG%2Fgo%2F153724534%2Fdirect%2F01%2F>
	> > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Always pause to request discussion on article talk page,
	only then revert
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4208250399108942627=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Agree. That is precisely what Irpen usually did. On Sun,
	Jun 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote: > In a message dated
	6/14/2009 9:09:51 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > wikibiophys@gmail.com
	writes: > > Who said two reverts a days would be fine? Looking at this >
	> >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Result_concerning_Shotlandiya
	> > it's clear he can block anyone for a couple of poorly justified
	reverts > made in different articles > a few months ago. Following this
	way may lead to everyone on all sides > being restricted. > > I think
	what made the difference on Aaviksoo was (fortunately, not taking >
	credit) that I had already requested discussion of the perceived WP:BLP
	> violation and those requests for discussion were ignored. The lesson
	here is > to > > 1. make the request to discuss and not revert back to
	their offending > content > 2. clearly state why the content was
	inappropriate > 3. then, and only then, make the revert of their content
	> > ...and repeat the request each time. > > /Peters > > > Choose the
	home loan that saves you the most $$$. Agents available at >
	ditech.com<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221374924x1201371434/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fclk.atdmt.com%2FDEG%2Fgo%2F153724534%2Fdirect%2F01%2F>
	> > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4208250399108942627==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d59e1f6fad4f046c59ef43

--0016e6d59e1f6fad4f046c59ef43
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Agree. That is precisely what Irpen usually did.

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:

>  In a message dated 6/14/2009 9:09:51 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> wikibiophys@gmail.com writes:
>
> Who said two reverts a days would be fine? Looking at this
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Result_concerning_Shotlandiya
>
> it's clear he can block anyone for a couple of poorly justified reverts
> made in different articles
> a few months ago. Following this way may lead to everyone on all sides
> being restricted.
>
>  I think what made the difference on Aaviksoo was (fortunately, not taking
> credit) that I had already requested discussion of the perceived WP:BLP
> violation and those requests for discussion were ignored. The lesson here is
> to
>
>    1. make the request to discuss and not revert back to their offending
>    content
>    2. clearly state why the content was inappropriate
>    3. then, and only then, make the revert of their content
>
> ...and repeat the request each time.
>
> /Peters
>
> ------------------------------
> Choose the home loan that saves you the most $$$. Agents available at
> ditech.com<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221374924x1201371434/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fclk.atdmt.com%2FDEG%2Fgo%2F153724534%2Fdirect%2F01%2F>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0016e6d59e1f6fad4f046c59ef43
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Agree. That is precisely what Irpen usually did.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM,  <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"=
mailto:PetersJV@aol.com">PetersJV@aol.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204=
); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">




<div style=3D"font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;"><f=
ont color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2">
<div>
<div>In a message dated 6/14/2009 9:09:51 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,=20
<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">wikibiophys@gmai=
l.com</a> writes:</div>
<blockquote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid blue; padding-left: 5px; margin=
-left: 5px;"><font style=3D"background-color: transparent;" color=3D"#00000=
0" face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2">Who said=20
  two reverts a days would be fine? Looking at this <br><br><a title=3D"htt=
p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Result_concern=
ing_Shotlandiya" href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_fo=
r_arbitration#Result_concerning_Shotlandiya" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wi=
kipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Result_concerning_Shotl=
andiya</a><br>
<br>it&#39;s=20
  clear he can block anyone for a couple of poorly justified reverts made i=
n=20
  different articles<br>a few months ago. Following this way may lead to=20
  everyone on all sides being restricted. <br></font></blockquote></div>
<div></div>
<div>I think what made the difference on Aaviksoo was (fortunately, not tak=
ing=20
credit) that I had already requested discussion of the perceived WP:BLP=20
violation and those requests for discussion were ignored. The lesson here i=
s=20
to</div>
<ol>
  <li>make the request to discuss and not revert back to their offending=20
  content</li>
  <li>clearly state why the content was inappropriate</li>
  <li>then, and only then, make the revert of their content</li></ol>
<div>...and repeat the request each time.</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>/Peters</div></font><div><br><font style=3D"color: black; font-family:=
 arial,san-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: no=
rmal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-st=
retch: normal;"> <hr style=3D"margin-top: 10px;">
Choose the home loan that saves you the most $$$. <a href=3D"http://pr.atwo=
la.com/promoclk/100126575x1221374924x1201371434/aol?redir=3Dhttp:%2F%2Fclk.=
atdmt.com%2FDEG%2Fgo%2F153724534%2Fdirect%2F01%2F" target=3D"_blank">Agents=
 available at ditech.com</a></font></div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e6d59e1f6fad4f046c59ef43--


--===============4208250399108942627==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4208250399108942627==--


