X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jun 18 22:50:58 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906181304x6fab2980se600cc88f41aaaf8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181257q5ee1749ap4872a277af9b7a6f@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906181304x6fab2980se600cc88f41aaaf8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:50:46 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0906181350i5fbd4cc9u41114510a11eab2@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Agree. No comments unless one has good diffs. This
	might
	not work because I have bad reputation (as one could see from the
	failure of my previous AE request about Russavia). I am also not sure
	if
	I can do it due to time limitations. If you or others could help with
	collecting and placing some diffs about BF4 here, that would be more
	doable. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7525016022475755019=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Agree. No comments unless one has good diffs. This might
	not work because I have bad reputation (as one could see from the
	failure of my previous AE request about Russavia). I am also not sure if
	I can do it due to time limitations. If you or others could help with
	collecting and placing some diffs about BF4 here, that would be more
	doable. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7525016022475755019==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c7bcde7b517046ca58fb0

--0016364c7bcde7b517046ca58fb0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Agree. No comments unless one has good diffs. This might not work because I
have bad reputation  (as one could see from the failure of my previous AE
request about Russavia). I am also not sure if I can do it due to time
limitations.  If you or others could help with collecting and placing some
diffs about BF4 here, that would be more doable.



On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 22:57, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> What I did was an experiment. There are two possible outcomes: (1) all of
>> that is dismissed as content dispute and bickering, and (2) Offliner and me
>> are restricted. In the case of latter scenario, I would probably submit new
>> AE requests about Russavia, Igny, PU, and BF4, unless you advise that
>> something else would be better.
>
>
> I see.  Then, an interesting battleplan would be to pretty much ignore the
> AE threads, and have the Cartel try to battle alone.  Piotrus: can this
> work?
>
> Russavia and Deacon are still important targets.  But if this goes through,
> I'd recommend going for BF4 next.  He's got one of the highest
> disruption/good edits ratios; a chance of getting him restricted or banned
> is among the highest.  Otherwise, the Cartel might start claiming you're
> just systematically reporting everybody who has opposed you, actual merit
> notwithstanding.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0016364c7bcde7b517046ca58fb0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Agree. No comments unless one has good diffs. This might not work because I=
 have bad reputation=A0 (as one could see from the failure of my previous A=
E request about Russavia). I am also not sure if I can do it due to time li=
mitations.=A0 If you or others could help with collecting and placing some =
diffs about BF4 here, that would be more doable.<br>
<br>=A0<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:04 PM, =
Digwuren <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwur=
en@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;=
 padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 22:57,=
 Andrei Dombay <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.co=
m" target=3D"_blank">wikibiophys@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 20=
4); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

What I did was an experiment. There are two possible outcomes: (1) all of t=
hat is dismissed as content dispute and bickering, and (2) Offliner and me =
are restricted. In the case of latter scenario, I would probably submit new=
 AE requests about Russavia, Igny, PU, and BF4, unless you advise that some=
thing else would be better.</blockquote>

</div><div><br>I see.=A0 Then, an interesting battleplan would be to pretty=
 much ignore the AE threads, and have the Cartel try to battle alone.=A0 Pi=
otrus: can this work?<br></div></div><br>Russavia and Deacon are still impo=
rtant targets.=A0 But if this goes through, I&#39;d recommend going for BF4=
 next.=A0 He&#39;s got one of the highest disruption/good edits ratios; a c=
hance of getting him restricted or banned is among the highest.=A0 Otherwis=
e, the Cartel might start claiming you&#39;re just systematically reporting=
 everybody who has opposed you, actual merit notwithstanding.<br>
<font color=3D"#888888">
<br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0016364c7bcde7b517046ca58fb0--


--===============7525016022475755019==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7525016022475755019==--


