X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jul 15 22:19:36 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <207274cd0907151310w1ae416can7120cc29f159be1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0907140825s36d6f83cje812f6b689af8992@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0907150045m6e1d76a0o5c8848f7eedfd0e7@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907150139j4a6b276ap213e1fac6e2a967e@mail.gmail.com>
	<207274cd0907151310w1ae416can7120cc29f159be1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:19:26 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907151319l6b03db97y913f4f56b9d339b4@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Oh, I agree that Pawel5586's a problem here too - I
	hadn't seen his comments when I wrote the message and have been
	ignoring
	him since then. Lvivske sounded ok in his response to me but he's
	leaving provocative edit summaries and the like [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Volhynia Massacres
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5068881192724517150=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Oh, I agree that Pawel5586's a problem here too - I
	hadn't seen his comments when I wrote the message and have been ignoring
	him since then. Lvivske sounded ok in his response to me but he's
	leaving provocative edit summaries and the like [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5068881192724517150==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364166f388ae01046ec4453a

--0016364166f388ae01046ec4453a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Oh, I agree that Pawel5586's a problem here too - I hadn't seen his comment=
s
when I wrote the message and have been ignoring him since then. Lvivske
sounded ok in his response to me but he's leaving provocative edit summarie=
s
and the like

Radek


2009/7/15 Ostap R <ostap30@gmail.com>

> I'm more worried that Lvivskie (who's obviously a troll, I actually
>> considered the idea that he's a Dr. Dan sock) will provoke Loosemark to =
a
>> point where an agreement can't be worked out - it'd be a typical case of=
 a
>> radical trolling user who radicalizes others, which should be prevented.
>>
>
>
>
> I think the radical, offensive, fringe troll in this case is Pawe=C5=8255=
86,
> rather than Lvivske (who I am quite confident is not a sock, certainly no=
t
> one of the "Dr. Dan").   Could someone please try to calm this user down?
>
> And Faustian is probably the best, most reasonable editor I have ever see=
n
> on wikipedia, so don't worry about him.
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0016364166f388ae01046ec4453a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Oh, I agree that Pawel5586&#39;s a problem here too - I hadn&#39;t seen his=
 comments when I wrote the message and have been ignoring him since then. L=
vivske sounded ok in his response to me but he&#39;s leaving provocative ed=
it summaries and the like<br>
<br>Radek<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/15 Ostap R <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ostap30@gmail.com">ostap30@gmail.com</a>&gt;=
</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px soli=
d rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1=
px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"=
>I&#39;m more worried that Lvivskie (who&#39;s obviously a troll, I actuall=
y considered the idea that he&#39;s a Dr. Dan sock) will provoke Loosemark =
to a point where an agreement can&#39;t be worked out - it&#39;d be a typic=
al case of a radical trolling user who radicalizes others, which should be =
prevented.<br>

</blockquote><br><br><br></div>I think the radical, offensive, fringe troll=
 in this case is Pawe=C5=825586, rather than Lvivske (who I am quite confid=
ent is not a sock, certainly not one of the &quot;Dr. Dan&quot;).=C2=A0=C2=
=A0 Could someone please try to calm this user down? <br>

<br>And Faustian is probably the best, most reasonable editor I have ever s=
een on wikipedia, so don&#39;t worry about him. =C2=A0=20
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0016364166f388ae01046ec4453a--


--===============5068881192724517150==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5068881192724517150==--


