X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 29 15:07:50 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906290557v54ca84ffw6fd1bfa41726da34@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0906281732s3836a51i757b5568dd328d63@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880906281902n56be257ao44cc951550f8b1e9@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906282003j163060b5y8ba6da454b967828@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906282012r23dcb4fcr3982e02029734d66@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906290536t1e1014c7t5915ae76f3772d56@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906290548w37de1fa2w2e2e0c4fc73e48d@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906290557v54ca84ffw6fd1bfa41726da34@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:07:35 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906290607n3820f96ledc8b75892a474f3@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Also, it would be useful if someone could
	elaborate/explain this portion of the AE guideline: "# In November 2008,
	the Arbitration Committee passed a motion which stated that
	administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly
	or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to
	the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being
	taken to enforce said remedy, except [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appeal at AE (was: Let's give Thatcher some breathing
	space)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Also, it would be useful if someone could
	elaborate/explain this portion of the AE guideline: "# In November 2008,
	the Arbitration Committee passed a motion which stated that
	administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly
	or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to
	the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being
	taken to enforce said remedy, except [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Also, it would be useful if someone could elaborate/explain this
portion of the AE guideline:

"# In November 2008, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion which
stated that administrators are prohibited from reversing or
overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another
administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy,
and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except

    * with the written authorization of the Committee, or
    * following a clear, substantial, and active community consensus to do so.

Provisionally (pending updates to the enforcement process), this
applies only to specific administrative actions affecting specific
users; it does not apply to notices, editor lists, warnings, broad
topic area actions, or other "enforcement actions" that are not
specific actions applied to specific editors. (Clarification motion)"

Obviously there is NOT going to be a "clear community consensus". Does
this mean that Thatcher is the only person who can rescind the ruling?
If so, then perhaps it would be better to go straight to RFAR?

Radek

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

