X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 14 12:46:31 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A34801C.7090403@post.pl>
References: <25890ca0906130020r6e5fad93x1d369c3b8df2a1b4@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906130914g6fd888c1oe642fb9937fa8713@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906130959x687d349bic13619cc3aeeef8@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A34801C.7090403@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:46:13 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0906140346g4af9fea8k41ed5914e35a37d8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I must think over what to write. As we all I have
	limited time :( Skapperod RfC is certainly something worth writing but
	I
	have to make a list of things to do(The 70th anniversary of WW2 is what
	I have on my mind and related articles) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Skapperod on the roll AGAIN
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I must think over what to write. As we all I have
	limited time :( Skapperod RfC is certainly something worth writing but I
	have to make a list of things to do(The 70th anniversary of WW2 is what
	I have on my mind and related articles) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0001]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I must think over what to write. As we all I have limited time :(
Skapperod RfC is certainly something worth writing but I have to make
a list of things to do(The 70th anniversary of WW2 is what I have on
my mind and related articles)

2009/6/14 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> Molobo Molobo wrote:
>> Unreliable sources used in articles made by Skapperod:
>
> I'd highly recommend that you take your time (since you have not many
> other choices anyway :>) and prepare a good RfC for them, than one of us
> can post it. Posting info here by piecemeal is not going to be most
> effective.
>
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

