X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Apr 27 11:36:32 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0904261238q3ba986b6l33a6331c9ee12f8f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <623986.62457.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0904241316y2d5d13ffre68cc86bc629bb99@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0904241418w42df54e2j71e867d659fabbc9@mail.gmail.com>
	<49F4AA8E.4050208@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0904261238q3ba986b6l33a6331c9ee12f8f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:36:16 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0904270236t42824be8xfeeea43d2e921f6c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.6
X-Spam_score_int: 6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 22:38, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess this is time for someone else
	to comment. The discussion follows > "me against Russavia" scenario,
	which is bad. Jayvdb claims his edit history looks like Russavia's.
	Let's take a look. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Evidence against Russavia
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6165490219773847474=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.8
X-Spam_score_int: 18
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 22:38, Andrei Dombay
	<wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess this is time for someone else
	to comment. The discussion follows > "me against Russavia" scenario,
	which is bad. Jayvdb claims his edit history looks like Russavia's.
	Let's take a look. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-0.2 BAYES_40               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40%
	[score: 0.2221]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6165490219773847474==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e269df425f40468861310

--0016368e269df425f40468861310
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 22:38, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:

> I guess this is time for someone else to comment. The discussion follows
> "me against Russavia" scenario, which is bad.


Jayvdb claims his edit history looks like Russavia's.  Let's take a look.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016368e269df425f40468861310
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 22:38, Andrei Dombay <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com">wikibiophys@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I guess this is time for someone else to comment. The discussion follows &q=
uot;me against Russavia&quot; scenario, which is bad.</blockquote><div><br>=
</div><div>Jayvdb claims his edit history looks like Russavia&#39;s. =C2=A0=
Let&#39;s take a look.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016368e269df425f40468861310--


--===============6165490219773847474==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6165490219773847474==--


