X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Sep  3 01:37:45 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A9EEDC9.8000908@post.pl>
References: <6c9a05ec0908311819w7da56eecp684e1a7b69b6c4c@mail.gmail.com>
	<856410.173.qm@web32803.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<6c9a05ec0909010316w5e877837k7a6c05d8dfefd550@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A9DC390.80604@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0909011834o51341d1ag8fe2086d8214d16@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0909020408t3465a07at5780b610d338a251@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A9EEDC9.8000908@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 02:37:41 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0909021637p293d987q1b79da7a02dba235@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Romanian president had today the annual meeting with
	diplomats, at which it is traditional for the president, seconded by the
	foreign minister, to state the current priorities of the foreign policy.
	In case some of you are interested, here they are as of September 2009:
	- ratification of Lisbon Treaty - obtaining for Romania the office of
	the European Commissioner for Agriculture - setting an European Agency
	for Coordination of National Authorities for Reglementation in the
	field
	of Energy, which could be located in Romania - Nabucco pipeline,
	mentioning that there is enough gas in Turkmenistan, Iran, Iraq and
	Caspic basin, the problem being to build the pipeline, not the
	availability of gas. Recall that recently, European governments have
	agreed to finance Nabicco, after two years of Romanian pressure to
	strengthen the common energy policy. - further developing the strategic
	partnerships with USA and France - focus Romanian diplomacy on
	Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan - upgrade relations with Poland
	and Turkey to strategic partnerships - peace in the Middle East can be
	achieved if parties drop preconditions, giving an explicit example: it
	is pointless to ask for the return of the Golan Heights as a
	precondition for discussions, since it is obviously clear that question
	number one in any bilateral discussions would be Golan Heights. -
	support for the EU and NATO integration of the western Balkan countries
	without any differences: support all countries indiscriminantly, and
	when a country is ready it should get in - support Serbia's territorial
	integrity at the International Court of Justice, re-stating that Romania
	does not recognize Kosovo - support Moldova's EU integration in the
	package with the western Balkans, and not in the package with Ukraine, 
	Turkey and other possible candidates. - continue to develop relations
	with China and Russia. In the case of China, the 2008 Romanian economy
	ministry was harshly criticized for failing 3 consecutive Chinese
	delegations that came to Romania to find ways to [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] a thought for the near future
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0106601017357446466=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Romanian president had today the annual meeting with
	diplomats, at which it is traditional for the president, seconded by the
	foreign minister, to state the current priorities of the foreign policy.
	In case some of you are interested, here they are as of September 2009:
	- ratification of Lisbon Treaty - obtaining for Romania the office of
	the European Commissioner for Agriculture - setting an European Agency
	for Coordination of National Authorities for Reglementation in the field
	of Energy, which could be located in Romania - Nabucco pipeline,
	mentioning that there is enough gas in Turkmenistan, Iran, Iraq and
	Caspic basin, the problem being to build the pipeline, not the
	availability of gas. Recall that recently, European governments have
	agreed to finance Nabicco, after two years of Romanian pressure to
	strengthen the common energy policy. - further developing the strategic
	partnerships with USA and France - focus Romanian diplomacy on
	Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan - upgrade relations with Poland
	and Turkey to strategic partnerships - peace in the Middle East can be
	achieved if parties drop preconditions, giving an explicit example: it
	is pointless to ask for the return of the Golan Heights as a
	precondition for discussions, since it is obviously clear that question
	number one in any bilateral discussions would be Golan Heights. -
	support for the EU and NATO integration of the western Balkan countries
	without any differences: support all countries indiscriminantly, and
	when a country is ready it should get in - support Serbia's territorial
	integrity at the International Court of Justice, re-stating that Romania
	does not recognize Kosovo - support Moldova's EU integration in the
	package with the western Balkans, and not in the package with Ukraine,
	Turkey and other possible candidates. - continue to develop relations
	with China and Russia. In the case of China, the 2008 Romanian economy
	ministry was harshly criticized for failing 3 consecutive Chinese
	delegations that came to Romania to find ways to [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0106601017357446466==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255544eac2a0620472a0c048

--0003255544eac2a0620472a0c048
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Romanian president had today the annual meeting with diplomats, at which it
is traditional for the president, seconded by the foreign minister, to state
the current priorities of the foreign policy. In case some of you are
interested, here they are as of September 2009:
- ratification of Lisbon Treaty
- obtaining for Romania the office of the European Commissioner for
Agriculture
- setting an European Agency for Coordination of National Authorities for
Reglementation in the field of Energy, which could be located in Romania
- Nabucco pipeline, mentioning that there is enough gas in Turkmenistan,
Iran, Iraq and Caspic basin, the problem being to build the pipeline, not
the availability of gas. Recall that recently, European governments have
agreed to finance Nabicco, after two years of Romanian pressure to
strengthen the common energy policy.
- further developing the strategic partnerships with USA and France
- focus Romanian diplomacy on Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan
- upgrade relations with Poland and Turkey to strategic partnerships
- peace in the Middle East can be achieved if parties drop preconditions,
giving an explicit example: it is pointless to ask for the return of the
Golan Heights as a precondition for discussions, since it is obviously clear
that question number one in any bilateral discussions would be Golan
Heights.
- support for the EU and NATO integration of the western Balkan countries
without any differences: support all countries indiscriminantly, and when a
country is ready it should get in
- support Serbia's territorial integrity at the International Court of
Justice, re-stating that Romania does not recognize Kosovo
- support Moldova's EU integration in the package with the western Balkans,
and not in the package with Ukraine, Turkey and other possible candidates.
- continue to develop relations with China and Russia. In the case of China,
the 2008 Romanian economy ministry was harshly criticized for failing 3
consecutive Chinese delegations that came to Romania to find ways to equate
the 2-billion euros trade dis-balance after special agreements between the
presidents (the then Romanian economy ministry was a highly incompetent and
corrupt person). In the case of Russia, it was mentioned that despite there
were some minor temporary incidents (perhaps meaning the spy case we
discussed several months ago among them), the relations should continue the
previous good path, and that Russia should treat Romania as equal and
respect its interests as Romania respects Russia's interests. "It does not
mean that Russia is equal to Romania economically, militarily, or as a
worldwide power, but should treat Romania as an equal dialog party" was
said.
- support for Romanian diaspora in the neighboring countries: Ukraine,
Serbia, Bulgaria and Hungary, mentioning that in some cases there are recent
worsening of the situation, although it was not meant which country or
countries it was meant. Serbia was slightly praised, so most likely it is
not Serbia. It was inferred that the problem is the preservation and
development of Romanian culture and language, and education in Romanian.
Romanian diplomats were urged to be more pro-active and defend the European
principles of minority rights for education and culture preservation. It is
very unlikely that the problem is Bulgaria, given the size of the Romanian
community there, and that there were no such problems with Bulgaria in the
last decades. So, most likely  it was meant Hungary or Ukraine. One word
might suggest that the problem is in Ukraine, because that word could be
interpreted as the country wants to join rather than it is already a member.
In this context, it is a known fact that over the last year the current
Timoshenko government forced Romanian language schools to become mixed
Romanian-Ukrainian even in completely Romanian villages. So it is possible
that this is what is meant. The situation in Hungary can also be meant,
because there is also a problem there with education in Romanian language,
but there were no recent developments (at least known in the press). Not all
issues were cleared yet with Serbia in recognizing the Timok Vlachs as
Romanians, but Serbia was praised in regard to Voevodina, so it is unlikely
it is Serbia meant. It is also possible that it was used in a generic sense
to mean all 4 countries with specific issues for each in regard to education
and culture in Romanian. The main focus was on Romanian diplomats trying to
avoid getting involved, not as much on the countries. It was mentioned that
the Romanian diplomats must be very active and signal problems as they occur
so that they can be addressed. But the diplomatic language was such chosen
that in fact anything could have been meant.

--0003255544eac2a0620472a0c048
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Romanian president had today the annual meeting with diplomats, at which it=
 is traditional for the president, seconded by the foreign minister, to sta=
te the current priorities of the foreign policy. In case some of you are in=
terested, here they are as of September 2009:<div>
<br></div><div>- ratification of Lisbon Treaty</div><div>- obtaining for Ro=
mania the office of the European Commissioner for Agriculture</div><div>- s=
etting an European Agency for Coordination of National Authorities for Regl=
ementation in the field of Energy, which could be located in Romania<span c=
lass=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-family: -webkit-sans-serif; ">=A0</=
span></div>
<div>- Nabucco pipeline, mentioning that there is enough gas in Turkmenista=
n, Iran, Iraq and Caspic basin, the problem being to build the pipeline, no=
t the availability of gas. Recall that recently, European governments have =
agreed to finance Nabicco, after two years of Romanian pressure to strength=
en the common energy policy.</div>
<div>- further developing the strategic partnerships with USA and France</d=
iv><div>- focus Romanian diplomacy on Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Kazakhst=
an</div><div>- upgrade relations with Poland and Turkey to strategic partne=
rships</div>
<div>- peace in the Middle East can be achieved if parties drop preconditio=
ns, giving an explicit example: it is pointless to ask for the return of th=
e Golan Heights as a precondition for discussions, since it is obviously cl=
ear that question number one in any bilateral discussions would be Golan He=
ights.=A0</div>
<div>- support for the EU and NATO integration of the western Balkan countr=
ies without any differences: support all countries indiscriminantly, and wh=
en a country is ready it should get in</div><div>- support Serbia&#39;s ter=
ritorial integrity at the International Court of Justice, re-stating that R=
omania does not recognize Kosovo</div>
<div>- support Moldova&#39;s EU integration in the package with the western=
 Balkans, and not in the package with Ukraine, Turkey and other possible ca=
ndidates.=A0</div><div>- continue to develop relations with China and Russi=
a. In the case of China, the 2008 Romanian economy ministry was harshly cri=
ticized for failing 3 consecutive Chinese delegations that came to Romania =
to find ways to equate the 2-billion euros trade dis-balance after special =
agreements between the presidents (the then Romanian economy ministry was a=
 highly incompetent and corrupt person). In the case of Russia, it was ment=
ioned that despite there were some minor temporary incidents (perhaps meani=
ng the spy case we discussed several months ago among them), the relations =
should continue the previous good path, and that Russia should treat Romani=
a as equal and respect its interests as Romania respects Russia&#39;s inter=
ests. &quot;It does not mean that Russia is equal to Romania economically, =
militarily, or as a worldwide power, but should treat Romania as an equal d=
ialog party&quot; was said.</div>
<div>- support for Romanian diaspora in the neighboring countries: Ukraine,=
 Serbia, Bulgaria and Hungary, mentioning that in some cases there are rece=
nt worsening of the situation, although it was not meant which country or c=
ountries it was meant. Serbia was slightly praised, so most likely it is no=
t Serbia. It was inferred that the problem is the preservation and developm=
ent of Romanian culture and language, and education in Romanian. Romanian d=
iplomats were urged to be more pro-active and defend the European principle=
s of minority rights for education and culture preservation. It is very unl=
ikely that the problem is Bulgaria, given the size of the Romanian communit=
y there, and that there were no such problems with Bulgaria in the last dec=
ades. So, most likely =A0it was meant Hungary or Ukraine. One word might su=
ggest that the problem is in Ukraine, because that word could be interprete=
d as the country wants to join rather than it is already a member. In this =
context, it is a known fact that over the last year the current Timoshenko =
government forced Romanian language schools to become mixed Romanian-Ukrain=
ian even in completely Romanian villages. So it is possible that this is wh=
at is meant. The situation in Hungary can also be meant, because there is a=
lso a problem there with education in Romanian language, but there were no =
recent developments (at least known in the press). Not all issues were clea=
red yet with Serbia in recognizing the Timok Vlachs as Romanians, but Serbi=
a was praised in regard to Voevodina, so it is unlikely it is Serbia meant.=
 It is also possible that it was used in a generic sense to mean all 4 coun=
tries with specific issues for each in regard to education and culture in R=
omanian. The main focus was on Romanian diplomats trying to avoid getting i=
nvolved, not as much on the countries. It was mentioned that the Romanian d=
iplomats must be very active and signal problems as they occur so that they=
 can be addressed. But the diplomatic language was such chosen that in fact=
 anything could have been meant.=A0</div>

--0003255544eac2a0620472a0c048--


--===============0106601017357446466==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0106601017357446466==--


