X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 29 20:19:07 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <494251.20348.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: LbK2n9MVM1lizjqi.axRAoRO8iEn5ZWSOjDz7.Ct9Wn4a_elI3heqMaTK9dJtauaq77.PrnLrIwBGEVRRr78_S9K.dKmiL3k.Lv4hoSbbh.0GB.vg1BhaVBeuW_8hX8Vkhey4lc15aX8h9ygQRAtJFOVXXfFD6LKbx42Y4BLZNM1Ebpqh09eB0Mgwu3ofKAW79YkZeSPc5UilSWInBQLknAMaHHbyxJq.LyxlkCwHv4U4skUJ38p2n6otgR_qS9rWljlms6HJX.ge6YkwUyzIjHetye5RS8Cit1oxB7XdKfOP79wa66gWVuIE48xBFgnkBIkce1qDEd_zBhVluc.qN_cYZjso8mocBmrYGj5MA--
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.4.17 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: 1.3
X-Spam_score_int: 13
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  All the women in my family also tend to revile my
	Wikipedia activity. Regardless, I think it's a good thing some kinds of
	women aren't there in greater numbers. Let me explain. You've probably
	heard of [[User:Bishonen]]. So, on May 21, she referred to a user as a
	"little shit":
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bishonen&diff=291466598&oldid=291465740
	. The next day, Jimbo Wales blocked her for 3 hours:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ABishonen
	. On June 7, she wrote a complaint about it, and has been pestering
	Jimbo as late as June 28: [[User_talk:Bishonen/block_discussion]]. (A
	sample of her whining: "...the demeaning way he blocked me: without
	warning; without discussion; in retaliation and punitively; blocking a
	user with five years of squeaky clean block log under her bra; blocking
	a user vulnerably asleep and thereby incapable of self-defence; blocking
	without care for context; and blocking in a hurry.") Well, if you call
	someone a "little shit", you can expect to be blocked, and a 3-hour
	block is really a slap on the wrist. I'm confident a man would have
	taken the block in stoic calm, rather than made this big scandal about
	it. On the other hand, while I don't know her, [[User:Jeanne boleyn]]
	seems like a very interesting woman,
	and someone I'd like to know. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Women and Wiklp
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5159797980758305213=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.3
X-Spam_score_int: 13
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  All the women in my family also tend to revile my
	Wikipedia activity. Regardless, I think it's a good thing some kinds of
	women aren't there in greater numbers. Let me explain. You've probably
	heard of [[User:Bishonen]]. So, on May 21, she referred to a user as a
	"little shit":
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bishonen&diff=291466598&oldid=291465740
	. The next day, Jimbo Wales blocked her for 3 hours:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ABishonen
	. On June 7, she wrote a complaint about it, and has been pestering
	Jimbo as late as June 28: [[User_talk:Bishonen/block_discussion]]. (A
	sample of her whining: "...the demeaning way he blocked me: without
	warning; without discussion; in retaliation and punitively; blocking a
	user with five years of squeaky clean block log under her bra; blocking
	a user vulnerably asleep and thereby incapable of self-defence; blocking
	without care for context; and blocking in a hurry.") Well, if you call
	someone a "little shit", you can expect to be blocked, and a 3-hour
	block is really a slap on the wrist. I'm confident a man would have
	taken the block in stoic calm, rather than made this big scandal about
	it. On the other hand, while I don't know her, [[User:Jeanne boleyn]]
	seems like a very interesting woman, and someone I'd like to know. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============5159797980758305213==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1025634162-1246299539=:20348"


--0-1025634162-1246299539=:20348
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All the women in my family also tend to revile my Wikipedia activity.
Regardless, I think it's a good thing some=A0kinds of women aren't there in=
 greater numbers. Let me explain. You've probably heard of [[User:Bishonen]=
]. So, on May 21, she referred to a user as a "little shit":=A0http://en.wi=
kipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Bishonen&diff=3D291466598&oldid=
=3D291465740 . The next day, Jimbo Wales blocked her for 3 hours:=A0http://=
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DSpecial:Log&type=3Dblock&page=3DUser%3=
ABishonen . On June 7, she wrote a complaint about it, and has been pesteri=
ng Jimbo as late as June 28: [[User_talk:Bishonen/block_discussion]]. (A sa=
mple of her whining: "...the demeaning way he blocked me: without warning; =
without discussion; in retaliation and punitively; blocking a user with fiv=
e years of squeaky clean block log under her bra; blocking a user vulnerabl=
y asleep and thereby incapable of self-defence; blocking without care for c=
ontext; and blocking in a hurry.")
Well, if you call someone a "little shit", you can expect to be blocked, an=
d a 3-hour block is really a slap on the wrist. I'm confident a man would h=
ave taken the block in stoic calm, rather than made this big scandal about =
it.
On the other hand, while I don't know her, [[User:Jeanne boleyn]] seems lik=
e a very interesting woman, and someone I'd like to know.=0A=0A=0A      
--0-1025634162-1246299539=:20348
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;"><div>All the women in my family also tend to =
revile my Wikipedia activity.</div><div><br></div>Regardless, I think it's =
a good thing <i>some</i>&nbsp;kinds of women aren't there in greater number=
s. Let me explain. You've probably heard of [[User:Bishonen]]. So, on May 2=
1, she referred to a user as a "little shit":&nbsp;http://en.wikipedia.org/=
w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Bishonen&amp;diff=3D291466598&amp;oldid=3D291=
465740 . The next day, Jimbo Wales blocked her for 3 hours:&nbsp;http://en.=
wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DSpecial:Log&amp;type=3Dblock&amp;page=3DU=
ser%3ABishonen . On June 7, she wrote a complaint about it, and has been pe=
stering Jimbo as late as <i>June 28</i>: [[User_talk:Bishonen/block_discuss=
ion]]. (A sample of her whining: "...the demeaning way he blocked me: witho=
ut warning; without discussion; in retaliation and punitively; blocking a u=
ser with five
 years of squeaky clean block log under her bra; blocking a user vulnerably=
 asleep and thereby incapable of self-defence; blocking without care for co=
ntext; and blocking in a hurry.")<div><br></div><div>Well, if you call some=
one a "little shit", you can expect to be blocked, and a 3-hour block is re=
ally a slap on the wrist. I'm confident a man would have taken the block in=
 stoic calm, rather than made this big scandal about it.</div><div><br></di=
v><div>On the other hand, while I don't know her, [[User:Jeanne boleyn]] se=
ems like a very interesting woman, and someone I'd like to know.</div></td>=
</tr></table><br>=0A=0A      
--0-1025634162-1246299539=:20348--


--===============5159797980758305213==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5159797980758305213==--


