X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 30 19:13:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906300800i73b500dcme382df96f2cbe5c7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0906300641x650da7e7nff045f4a10862e71@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906300725o64bf1aebp176b7447bf8fbd62@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906300800i73b500dcme382df96f2cbe5c7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:13:29 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0906301013i387b0cf6q83e687f702b4e2c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I am quite certain that IP check during Sockpuppet
	investigation would turn badly for both Skapperod and HerkusMonte.
	2009/6/30 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>: > I think both Loosmark
	and
	HerkusMonte just violated 3RR on [[Polish > Corridor]] (despite the
	fact
	that I emailed Loosmark and told him to > be careful). Neither of them
	has any prior blocks. I'm also not sure > if filing would be a good
	idea
	- but it is something to watch, just in > case Skapperod or someone else
	files to make sure that HM gets his due > as well - and if we're lucky
	maybe somehow this could be spun into > hitting HM or Skapper with
	Thatcher's restriction. > > Radek > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion
	list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] and Jacob Peters probably back too
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I am quite certain that IP check during Sockpuppet
	investigation would turn badly for both Skapperod and HerkusMonte.
	2009/6/30 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>: > I think both Loosmark and
	HerkusMonte just violated 3RR on [[Polish > Corridor]] (despite the fact
	that I emailed Loosmark and told him to > be careful). Neither of them
	has any prior blocks. I'm also not sure > if filing would be a good idea
	- but it is something to watch, just in > case Skapperod or someone else
	files to make sure that HM gets his due > as well - and if we're lucky
	maybe somehow this could be spun into > hitting HM or Skapper with
	Thatcher's restriction. > > Radek > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion
	list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I am quite certain that IP check during Sockpuppet investigation would
turn badly for both Skapperod and HerkusMonte.

2009/6/30 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>:
> I think both Loosmark and HerkusMonte just violated 3RR on [[Polish
> Corridor]] (despite the fact that I emailed Loosmark and told him to
> be careful). Neither of them has any prior blocks. I'm also not sure
> if filing would be a good idea - but it is something to watch, just in
> case Skapperod or someone else files to make sure that HM gets his due
> as well - and if we're lucky maybe somehow this could be spun into
> hitting HM or Skapper with Thatcher's restriction.
>
> Radek
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

