X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Aug 19 17:53:31 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:53:23 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0908190853u7d1c8135n35c195712d1367db@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I think this recent spat about Nawratil with Skapperod
	should go into any future RFC against him. Here are some comments he
	made earlier:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive558#Possible_BLP_issue
	[...] Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: [WPM] For the record/future RFC of Skapperod
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5030984225816455174=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I think this recent spat about Nawratil with Skapperod
	should go into any future RFC against him. Here are some comments he
	made earlier:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive558#Possible_BLP_issue
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5030984225816455174==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d99c4b88d506047180a205

--0016e6d99c4b88d506047180a205
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I think this recent spat about Nawratil with Skapperod should go into any
future RFC against him. Here are some comments he made earlier:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive558#Possible_BLP_issue

*Circumstantial evidence was presented that the subject published in a
journal associated with Holocaust denial. A booksearch has not turned out
any matches of the subject's name and right-wing exremism.*

And :

*What makes it even more spicy is that the person in question is a lawyer,
decorated for his law-related achievements.*

So we have Skapperod trying to defend what now we know a well known far
right extremists from German nationalist circles and claiming he is
decorated lawyer(indicating he knows him) while alledging a booksearch
turned out nothing-which is again wrong since my search in german for it
turned out several.

Why is it relevant ? Because it is a fourth time Skapperod uses extreme
right wing source or Nazi one and tries to defend it as neutral in
discussion.
We had Nazi propaganda book in Prussian colonization of Poland.
We had self-published propaganda book equalizing Jewish Holocaust to
population transfer of Germans
We had Skapperod giving Oberlander as non-nazi.

So I think this is a certain pattern worth pointing out in future RFC.

--0016e6d99c4b88d506047180a205
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think this recent spat about Nawratil with Skapperod should go into any f=
uture RFC against him. Here are some comments he made earlier:<br><br><a hr=
ef=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/=
IncidentArchive558#Possible_BLP_issue">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped=
ia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive558#Possible_BLP_issue</a><=
br>
<br><i>Circumstantial evidence was presented that the subject published in =
a
journal associated with Holocaust denial.<u> A booksearch has not turned
out any matches of the subject&#39;s name and right-wing exremism.</u></i><=
br><br>And :<br><br><i>What makes it even more spicy is that the person in =
question is a lawyer, decorated for his law-related achievements.</i><br>
<br>So we have Skapperod trying to defend what now we know a well known far=
 right extremists from German nationalist circles and claiming he is decora=
ted lawyer(indicating he knows him) while alledging a booksearch turned out=
 nothing-which is again wrong since my search in german for it turned out s=
everal.<br>
<br>Why is it relevant ? Because it is a fourth time Skapperod uses extreme=
 right wing source or Nazi one and tries to defend it as neutral in discuss=
ion.<br>We had Nazi propaganda book in Prussian colonization of Poland.<br>
We had self-published propaganda book equalizing Jewish Holocaust to popula=
tion transfer of Germans<br>We had Skapperod giving Oberlander as non-nazi.=
<br><br>So I think this is a certain pattern worth pointing out in future R=
FC.<br>
<br>

--0016e6d99c4b88d506047180a205--


--===============5030984225816455174==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5030984225816455174==--


