X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Aug 13 17:12:33 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880908122147s4da3e90fh763550ff75c7ece6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4f045a880908122142nc29c0e8rdab4757897a267bc@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880908122147s4da3e90fh763550ff75c7ece6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:12:16 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0908130812k7c90d139qb9f56be7e96be0de@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: He frequently blocked users with whom he had content
	disputes; that was previously brought to Arbcom by Giovanni33 and his
	friends, but did not result in any sanctions (a failed Arbcom request or
	an RfC about
	Connolley<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip>
	). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] William M. Connolley RFAR
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3136391987906574529=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  He frequently blocked users with whom he had content
	disputes; that was previously brought to Arbcom by Giovanni33 and his
	friends, but did not result in any sanctions (a failed Arbcom request or
	an RfC about
	Connolley<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip>
	). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3136391987906574529==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221540170e73da410471075c44

--00221540170e73da410471075c44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

He frequently blocked users with whom he had content disputes; that was
previously brought to Arbcom by Giovanni33 and his friends, but did not
result in any sanctions (a failed Arbcom request or an RfC about
Connolley<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip>
).

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:

> ps,
>
> check out the evidence of Ikip
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Martin<martint20@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Check out
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Workshop#William_M._Connolley_is_desysoped
> > several ArbCom members are backing desysoping William.
> >
> > It may be worthwhile contributing, I don't think he is sympathetic to
> > our efforts, seeming to favour team Offliner, and recall his efforts
> > in removing content from [[Nuclear Winter]] then ignoring any
> > discussion on talk.
> >
> > I also recall he made some pretty bad blocks on some of us, for
> > example blocking me for edit warring 24 hours after my last edit which
> > was to undo myself. He also claimed one of my edits was a revert, see
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:William_M._Connolley#Question_about_Martintg_edit_warring
> .
> > Just yesterday he blocked a couple of people for no real reason other
> > than they were discussing something on his talk page, he later reduced
> > the block to one hour. But I also recall he made some serious mistakes
> > like blocking the wrong people, or so he claimed, several times.
> > Anyone else recall such things, I will compile it and add it to the
> > case.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Martin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--00221540170e73da410471075c44
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

He frequently blocked users with whom he had content disputes; that was pre=
viously brought to Arbcom by Giovanni33 and his friends, but did not result=
 in any sanctions (a failed Arbcom request or an RfC about <a href=3D"http:=
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._=
Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip" target=3D"_blank">Connolley<=
/a>).<br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Martin <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:martint20@gmail.com">martint20@gmail.c=
om</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"bord=
er-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-l=
eft: 1ex;">
ps,<br>
<br>
check out the evidence of Ikip<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case=
/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip" target=3D"_b=
lank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-=
William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip</a><br>

<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Martin&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:martint20@gmai=
l.com">martint20@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; Check out <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitratio=
n/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Workshop#William_M._Connolley_is_d=
esysoped" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitrat=
ion/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Workshop#William_M._Connolley_is=
_desysoped</a><br>

&gt; several ArbCom members are backing desysoping William.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; It may be worthwhile contributing, I don&#39;t think he is sympathetic=
 to<br>
&gt; our efforts, seeming to favour team Offliner, and recall his efforts<b=
r>
&gt; in removing content from [[Nuclear Winter]] then ignoring any<br>
&gt; discussion on talk.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I also recall he made some pretty bad blocks on some of us, for<br>
&gt; example blocking me for edit warring 24 hours after my last edit which=
<br>
&gt; was to undo myself. He also claimed one of my edits was a revert, see<=
br>
&gt; <a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:William_M._Connolley=
#Question_about_Martintg_edit_warring" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedi=
a.org/wiki/User_talk:William_M._Connolley#Question_about_Martintg_edit_warr=
ing</a>.<br>

&gt; Just yesterday he blocked a couple of people for no real reason other<=
br>
&gt; than they were discussing something on his talk page, he later reduced=
<br>
&gt; the block to one hour. But I also recall he made some serious mistakes=
<br>
&gt; like blocking the wrong people, or so he claimed, several times.<br>
&gt; Anyone else recall such things, I will compile it and add it to the<br=
>
&gt; case.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; --<br>
&gt; Regards,<br>
&gt; Martin<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Regards,<br>
Martin<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--00221540170e73da410471075c44--


--===============3136391987906574529==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3136391987906574529==--


