X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 22 06:19:51 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A3F06D4.2070406@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:21:40 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>	<929ed1ec0906211430n74ede828t87898697dbadcaa0@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0906211432i395bb0d1v4ace9d2f4da52cc4@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0906211438u405219b9se5a775761f8b8a7e@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0906211441w1782cb63x753f942d98d167bb@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0906211507t40b06546n96fa2e485f48ec5@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0906211511v542ad8dj252f7043e6eb1bb8@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0906211522t16b93620r8ff75fc90b7ac43@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0906211531w4fc9a4d0v22662eb8d7c3d0be@mail.gmail.com>	<929ed1ec0906211533y1638c2d3oa11830253dafb791@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211548re27af99x8f55f211ce8eab67@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906211548re27af99x8f55f211ce8eab67@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > One more note: since Jeh is
	basically questioning the competence of > the AE admins it might be
	worth while to offer a few words of support > for Sandstein, AGK and
	that other fella somewhere - something along > the lines of "they're
	working hard, sometimes they decided not quite > in a way that I wanted,
	but I respect their hard work and they should > be commended instead of
	having abuse heaped upon them. Overall for the > most part they've
	decided cases correctly (include some examples where > it was a pretty
	clear cut matter, like Smith2006)". > Benefits is brownie points,
	positioning yourself as "part of the > system" that bad admins like Jeh
	are trying to upset and polarizing > some of the admins (hopefully
	separating those with obvious bad > intentions like Jeh and Deacon from
	those who actually strive for some > neutrality) > Costs are
	potentially
	polarizing the admins and getting blamed for it. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > One more note: since Jeh is
	basically questioning the competence of > the AE admins it might be
	worth while to offer a few words of support > for Sandstein, AGK and
	that other fella somewhere - something along > the lines of "they're
	working hard, sometimes they decided not quite > in a way that I wanted,
	but I respect their hard work and they should > be commended instead of
	having abuse heaped upon them. Overall for the > most part they've
	decided cases correctly (include some examples where > it was a pretty
	clear cut matter, like Smith2006)". > Benefits is brownie points,
	positioning yourself as "part of the > system" that bad admins like Jeh
	are trying to upset and polarizing > some of the admins (hopefully
	separating those with obvious bad > intentions like Jeh and Deacon from
	those who actually strive for some > neutrality) > Costs are potentially
	polarizing the admins and getting blamed for it. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

radek szulga wrote:
> One more note: since Jeh is basically questioning the competence of
> the AE admins it might be worth while to offer a few words of support
> for Sandstein, AGK and that other fella somewhere - something along
> the lines of "they're working hard, sometimes they decided not quite
> in a way that I wanted, but I respect their hard work and they should
> be commended instead of having abuse heaped upon them. Overall for the
> most part they've decided cases correctly (include some examples where
> it was a pretty clear cut matter, like Smith2006)".
> Benefits is brownie points, positioning yourself as "part of the
> system" that bad admins like Jeh are trying to upset and polarizing
> some of the admins (hopefully separating those with obvious bad
> intentions like Jeh and Deacon from those who actually strive for some
> neutrality)
> Costs are potentially polarizing the admins and getting blamed for it.

I think the benefits are worth it. Just don't attack Jeh to openly, or 
we risk admins coming to his defense! Support the admins he is 
attacking, and it looks so much better.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

