X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  1 10:58:58 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A238480.5040704@post.pl>
References: <4A238480.5040704@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:58:42 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906010158l333a1c0bwd3d1255df947b517@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:34, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > That's all I have to say, other whenever
	Molobo comes back, his new > account should behave sufficiently
	different to deal with future > "behavioral analysis". [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] [WMP] Molobo ban
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7433142998556488850=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.7
X-Spam_score_int: 17
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:34, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > That's all I have to say, other whenever
	Molobo comes back, his new > account should behave sufficiently
	different to deal with future > "behavioral analysis". [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4732]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7433142998556488850==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163605988c0f9999046b45a238

--00163605988c0f9999046b45a238
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:34, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> That's all I have to say, other whenever Molobo comes back, his new
> account should behave sufficiently different to deal with future
> "behavioral analysis".


I think sock accounts should be shared between wildly differing people of
wildly differing habits.  This tends to neutralise personality quirks,
confuse Bayesian statistics, and with some luck, also draw less attention.
 Also, manufactured personality and spelling quirks are probably useful.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--00163605988c0f9999046b45a238
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:34, Piotr Konieczny <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
That&#39;s all I have to say, other whenever Molobo comes back, his new<br>
account should behave sufficiently different to deal with future<br>
&quot;behavioral analysis&quot;.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I think so=
ck accounts should be shared between wildly differing people of wildly diff=
ering habits. =C2=A0This tends to neutralise personality quirks, confuse Ba=
yesian statistics, and with some luck, also draw less attention. =C2=A0Also=
, manufactured personality and spelling quirks are probably useful.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--00163605988c0f9999046b45a238--


--===============7433142998556488850==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7433142998556488850==--


