X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jul  6 05:28:34 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0907051951v36d2d7aev40a1245bdcc43291@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0907051248n46416964qc6fa2c7c069a4f9f@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A515A8A.2000600@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0907051951v36d2d7aev40a1245bdcc43291@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:28:03 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0907052028t4482f478gcde4b823bee69328@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.6
X-Spam_score_int: 6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Kirill commented favorably to Radek. You can restate
	that you are "stepping away" from those articles. If I were you, I'd say
	something like: "When was it one single time that I was told to take a
	deep breath and I did not listen to the advice? I need not be told, I
	need only be suggested, and I immediately step away. Give me a single
	example when I preferred further confrontation instead of stepping away
	or of discussing while refraining from edits. You would never find such
	an example. If I was bold to edit, my comments contained the words "feel
	free to undo me". That is just the opposite to confrontation." [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Ok,
	I know these are vandalisms on a serious subject but I thought they
	were pretty funny
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2737308333254844460=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.6
X-Spam_score_int: 6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Kirill commented favorably to Radek. You can restate
	that you are "stepping away" from those articles. If I were you, I'd say
	something like: "When was it one single time that I was told to take a
	deep breath and I did not listen to the advice? I need not be told, I
	need only be suggested, and I immediately step away. Give me a single
	example when I preferred further confrontation instead of stepping away
	or of discussing while refraining from edits. You would never find such
	an example. If I was bold to edit, my comments contained the words "feel
	free to undo me". That is just the opposite to confrontation." [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2737308333254844460==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de010f048a69046e01183c

--0016e6de010f048a69046e01183c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Kirill commented favorably to Radek. You can restate that you are "stepping
away" from those articles. If I were you, I'd say something like:
 "When was it one single time that I was told to take a deep breath and I
did not listen to the advice? I need not be told, I need only be suggested,
and I immediately step away. Give me a single example when I preferred
further confrontation instead of stepping away or of discussing while
refraining from edits. You would never find such an example. If I was bold
to edit, my comments contained the words "feel free to undo me". That is
just the opposite to confrontation."

--0016e6de010f048a69046e01183c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Kirill commented favorably to Radek. You can restate that you are &quot;ste=
pping away&quot; from those articles. If I were you, I&#39;d say something =
like:<div><br></div><div>=A0&quot;When was it one single time that I was to=
ld to take a deep breath and I did not listen to the advice? I need not be =
told, I need only be suggested, and I immediately step away. Give me a sing=
le example when I preferred further confrontation instead of stepping away =
or of discussing while refraining from edits. You would never find such an =
example. If I was bold to edit, my comments contained the words &quot;feel =
free to undo me&quot;. That is just the opposite to confrontation.&quot;=A0=
<br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><br></div></div>

--0016e6de010f048a69046e01183c--


--===============2737308333254844460==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2737308333254844460==--


