X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jun 20 04:58:47 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880906191952h2c73b422w3e746cce1bf2ed5f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ca3.534dabe2.376d98de@aol.com>
	<4f045a880906191952h2c73b422w3e746cce1bf2ed5f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:58:28 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880906191958u733dd063if7cd1f77d349e7be@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: The aim here at this stage is not to have ArbCom
	accept
	the case, so we don't waat to dive in with diffs and counter accusations
	because this will only reinforce in ArbComs mind that there really is a
	battle going on, and thus make it more likely they will accept the case.
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] It isn't over.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  The aim here at this stage is not to have ArbCom accept
	the case, so we don't waat to dive in with diffs and counter accusations
	because this will only reinforce in ArbComs mind that there really is a
	battle going on, and thus make it more likely they will accept the case.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

The aim here at this stage is not to have ArbCom accept the case, so
we don't waat to dive in with diffs and counter accusations because
this will only reinforce in ArbComs mind that there really is a battle
going on, and thus make it more likely they will accept the case.

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Martin<martint20@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Peters,
>
> Your first entry on the ArbCom page is excellent, but you might want
> to refactor your two subsequent entries, as it reads a bit combative,
> particularly the clerk's question about naming, and "Arbcom
> frustration". It is only Jehochmen expressing frustration, the issue
> with him seems to be timorousness in applying discretionary sanctions
> (has he ever) and trying to offload back to ArbCom, which begs the
> question if he is so timorous, why is he doing AE duty.
>
> Sandstein in contrast has no problems using sanctions and is doing a great job.
>
> Martin
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:43 AM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
>> Let them come to us.
>>
>> Patience all. We have outlasted others, we will outlast the latest pack too.
>> Let them be the ones on the attack. Sticking to reputable sources always
>> eventually forces them to step over the line to push their POV as equally
>> valid.
>>
>> /Peters
>> ________________________________
>> Dell Inspiron 15: Now starting at $349
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

