X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jul  7 18:55:17 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0907070621k61699b99kc595911ad1914881@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0907031517taba84aaodd143d82c724e8db@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907061327p1c5ce381yc5496196b7b7e8f4@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0907061547r48b175adk91f8f9cc8fc69339@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A5282D8.5000604@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0907061610o58cd553cw39ee9c1de14f6bf@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A5299F1.1000207@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0907070059v59ab4d50wca39f1a9d5a87cc8@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907070514m197bc2a0o1baab97ce1a1c625@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907070533m7f13c010p8b06b8a6a2e1edbc@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907070621k61699b99kc595911ad1914881@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:55:03 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0907070955g12b898f7i7b9adb461218cc24@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 16:21, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > After Thatcher's latest at the
	Clarification request I think I'm going to > skip thanking him. A part
	of me wants to ask him who's a bigger crybaby, an > editor who appeals
	an unjust sanction, or an administrator who just can't > stand to have
	his rulings and omnipotence questioned? Not gonna, but want > to. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appeal
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2533144192449200997=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 16:21, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > After Thatcher's latest at the
	Clarification request I think I'm going to > skip thanking him. A part
	of me wants to ask him who's a bigger crybaby, an > editor who appeals
	an unjust sanction, or an administrator who just can't > stand to have
	his rulings and omnipotence questioned? Not gonna, but want > to. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2533144192449200997==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d64163ec6dad046e207b5b

--0016e6d64163ec6dad046e207b5b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 16:21, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

> After Thatcher's latest at the Clarification request I think I'm going to
> skip thanking him. A part of me wants to ask him who's a bigger crybaby, an
> editor who appeals an unjust sanction, or an administrator who just can't
> stand to have his rulings and omnipotence questioned? Not gonna, but want
> to.


Those were Thatcher's sanctions.  Offliner is now lobbying to get
Sandstein's sanctions also lifted.  This includes Shotlandiya and Beatle Fab
Four.

What will the outcome be?  Nothing else that the EE area will be slightly
more unstable on Wikipedia: some more administrators will be reluctant to
get involved in even simple things, and we can only expect more people like
Jehochman to show up occasionally.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6d64163ec6dad046e207b5b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 16:21, radek szulga <span=
 dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rsszulga@gmail.com</=
a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0=
 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
After Thatcher&#39;s latest at the Clarification request I think I&#39;m go=
ing to skip thanking him. A part of me wants to ask him who&#39;s a bigger =
crybaby, an editor who appeals an unjust sanction, or an administrator who =
just can&#39;t stand to have his rulings and omnipotence questioned? Not go=
nna, but want to.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Those were Thatcher&#39;s sanctions. =C2=A0Offliner is =
now lobbying to get Sandstein&#39;s sanctions also lifted. =C2=A0This inclu=
des Shotlandiya and Beatle Fab Four.</div><div><br></div><div>What will the=
 outcome be? =C2=A0Nothing else that the EE area will be slightly more unst=
able on Wikipedia: some more administrators will be reluctant to get involv=
ed in even simple things, and we can only expect more people like Jehochman=
 to show up occasionally.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e6d64163ec6dad046e207b5b--


--===============2533144192449200997==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2533144192449200997==--


