X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 30 20:40:42 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906301128kb8315f0pb526ab31f1aae6f1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0906300641x650da7e7nff045f4a10862e71@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906300725o64bf1aebp176b7447bf8fbd62@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906300800i73b500dcme382df96f2cbe5c7@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906301013i387b0cf6q83e687f702b4e2c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906301128kb8315f0pb526ab31f1aae6f1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:40:36 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0906301140m5e184e7eh9e9e549b506fc75c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Never created a SPI before. Isn't it done
	automatically
	? I can write content for SPI and point out to past joint actions of
	the
	two accounts, same phrases and same edit wars. 2009/6/30 Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 20:13, Molobo Molobo
	<molobus@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I am quite certain that IP check
	during
	Sockpuppet investigation would >> turn badly for both Skapperod and
	HerkusMonte. > > It's probably a good time for doing it, considering the
	development at AE. > If we're lucky (well ...), the SPI will be over
	before the AE is even > picked up. Can you construct a SPI request? I'm
	sure somebody here can > file it. > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] and Jacob Peters probably back too
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Never created a SPI before. Isn't it done automatically
	? I can write content for SPI and point out to past joint actions of the
	two accounts, same phrases and same edit wars. 2009/6/30 Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 20:13, Molobo Molobo
	<molobus@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I am quite certain that IP check during
	Sockpuppet investigation would >> turn badly for both Skapperod and
	HerkusMonte. > > It's probably a good time for doing it, considering the
	development at AE. > If we're lucky (well ...), the SPI will be over
	before the AE is even > picked up. Can you construct a SPI request? I'm
	sure somebody here can > file it. > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Never created a SPI before. Isn't it done automatically ? I can write
content for SPI and point out to past joint actions of the two
accounts, same phrases and same edit wars.


2009/6/30 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 20:13, Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am quite certain that IP check during Sockpuppet investigation would
>> turn badly for both Skapperod and HerkusMonte.
>
> It's probably a good time for doing it, considering the development at AE.
> =A0If we're lucky (well ...), the SPI will be over before the AE is even
> picked up. =A0Can you construct a SPI request? =A0I'm sure somebody here =
can
> file it.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

