X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 12 01:26:59 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <250142.35491.qm@web32803.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <250142.35491.qm@web32803.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:26:54 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906111626l6a035ac7le73772a6549958fa@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: This seems shocking to me too - I haven't seen stuff
	like this before. Two week block for basically a misunderstanding with
	threats of an indef ban because basically an admin's ego was bruised.
	And yet we always keep hearing about how admins are "just regular
	editors" with a bit more responsibility. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] blocked
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  This seems shocking to me too - I haven't seen stuff
	like this before. Two week block for basically a misunderstanding with
	threats of an indef ban because basically an admin's ego was bruised.
	And yet we always keep hearing about how admins are "just regular
	editors" with a bit more responsibility. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

This seems shocking to me too - I haven't seen stuff like this before.
Two week block for basically a misunderstanding with threats of an
indef ban because basically an admin's ego was bruised. And yet we
always keep hearing about how admins are "just regular editors" with a
bit more responsibility.

Radek

2009/6/11 piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>:
> See you have been unblocked. I was going to leave a comment on your talk
> page, but I do not really know if it will be helpful. Anyway, this is
> shocking to me. Vicenarian started the edit war, and you were the one
> punished for it.
>
> Tymek
>
> --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [WPM] blocked
> To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 5:38 PM
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 01:35, piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Is there anything I could help out there? I did not really follow the
>> article, and I do not know the reason for blocking. Nevertheless, let me
>> know if my help is needed.
>
> I don't know.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

