X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jan 11 09:26:47 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <f826636f0901110026u82df563r632bd5c4d38d70d4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:26:33 +0200
From: "Dorin Cheptea" <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0901101827y6f936724g259b9c942df9c7ca@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <929ed1ec0901090323y236c1203peb362f3b9b79bb35@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0901101827y6f936724g259b9c942df9c7ca@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Happy New year, everybody! (sorry, I was for a while
	away from internet access, thus I long since missed the opportunity to
	convey Chiristmas wishes) ---- To the issue: [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Malbork massacre
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0405969873587909123=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.7
X-Spam_score_int: 27
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Happy New year, everybody! (sorry, I was for a while
	away from internet access, thus I long since missed the opportunity to
	convey Chiristmas wishes) ---- To the issue: [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4557]
	1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0405969873587909123==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_6607_7422212.1231662393435"

------=_Part_6607_7422212.1231662393435
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Happy New year, everybody!

(sorry, I was for a while away from internet access, thus I long since
missed the opportunity to convey Chiristmas wishes)

---- To the issue:

Then say just as it is:

*Der Spiegel considers that the grave is associated with a Red Army advance
from 1945, after which 1840 people went missing. However, accodring to Bild,
an official investigation of the remains has just started. Thus, it appears
too early to draw any conclusions based on the human remains.
*
If Team USSR joins in with a dosen of other examples, please also add this
one:

*Given the fact that no conclusive carbon dating has been performed yet, it
is logical to admit also the alternative that some of the remains might also
date back In 1421, when during a siege of Marienburg a number of Teutons
were ambushed in a small wood just under the walls of the city by a goup of
200 Moldavian solders sent by prince Alexander the Good to add his then
Polish allies.*

It is absolute truth, and I can sourse it to both primary and secondary
refs. It is true also that most probably the Teutons were afterwards buried
in a Christian manner and that they were more likely 18 than 1800. But just
in case team USSR joins, you can have some fun adding it. :)

  Dorin

------=_Part_6607_7422212.1231662393435
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div>Happy New year, everybody!</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>(sorry, I was for a while away from internet access, thus I long since missed the opportunity&nbsp;to convey Chiristmas wishes)</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>---- To the issue:</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Then say just as it is:</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><em>Der Spiegel considers that the grave is associated with a Red Army advance from 1945, after which 1840 people went missing. However, accodring to Bild, an official investigation of the remains has&nbsp;just started. Thus, it appears too early to draw any conclusions based on the human remains. <br>
</em><br>If Team USSR joins in with a dosen of other examples, please also add this one:</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><em>Given the fact that no conclusive carbon dating has been performed yet, it is logical to admit also the alternative that some of the remains might also date back In 1421,&nbsp;when during&nbsp;a siege of Marienburg a number of Teutons were ambushed in a small&nbsp;wood just under the walls of the city by a goup of 200 Moldavian solders sent by prince Alexander the Good to add his then Polish allies.</em></div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>It&nbsp;is absolute truth, and I can sourse it to both primary and secondary refs.&nbsp;It is true also that most probably the Teutons were afterwards buried in a Christian manner and that they were more likely 18 than 1800. But just in case team USSR joins, you can have some fun adding it. :)</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;&nbsp;Dorin</div>

------=_Part_6607_7422212.1231662393435--


--===============0405969873587909123==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0405969873587909123==--


