X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 18:14:26 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A3E5CD3.6030301@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:16:19 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <ca3.534dabe2.376d98de@aol.com>	<4f045a880906191952h2c73b422w3e746cce1bf2ed5f@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880906191958u733dd063if7cd1f77d349e7be@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880906191958u733dd063if7cd1f77d349e7be@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Martin wrote: > The aim here at this stage is not to
	have ArbCom accept the case, so > we don't waat to dive in with diffs
	and counter accusations because > this will only reinforce in ArbComs
	mind that there really is a battle > going on, and thus make it more
	likely they will accept the case. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] It isn't over.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Martin wrote: > The aim here at this stage is not to
	have ArbCom accept the case, so > we don't waat to dive in with diffs
	and counter accusations because > this will only reinforce in ArbComs
	mind that there really is a battle > going on, and thus make it more
	likely they will accept the case. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Martin wrote:
> The aim here at this stage is not to have ArbCom accept the case, so
> we don't waat to dive in with diffs and counter accusations because
> this will only reinforce in ArbComs mind that there really is a battle
> going on, and thus make it more likely they will accept the case.

Seems like there is a good chance this will get rejected, so far only 
one arb is supporting, two are rejecting and one is likely to do so.

Do read Deacon's comments who discusses the "Polish-Baltic" alliance:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Comment_from_Deacon_of_Pndapetzim

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

