X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  2 10:48:44 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A24C3CF.7020305@post.pl>
References: <929ed1ec0906011001l2f7a4a8dq4da0837bd4054eff@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906011016n6e3f569av1576023b93173d9@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A240EF7.2050907@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0906011500u3669d036j30639bde342ea987@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A24C3CF.7020305@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:48:28 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906020148w5457acc8r603a77729a97d3d3@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 09:16, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Andrei Dombay wrote: > > Thank you! I do not
	need anything right now in Commons, excepts > > deleting this remaining
	link (if possible), because it can be used by > > people like DD,
	precisely in the way he just did. > > Oversight should be able to do
	it. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] DonaldDuck unblocked
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6638206389869209065=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 09:16, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Andrei Dombay wrote: > > Thank you! I do not
	need anything right now in Commons, excepts > > deleting this remaining
	link (if possible), because it can be used by > > people like DD,
	precisely in the way he just did. > > Oversight should be able to do it.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0094]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6638206389869209065==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de04e1545902046b599b11

--0016e6de04e1545902046b599b11
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 09:16, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> Andrei Dombay wrote:
> > Thank you!  I do not need anything right now in Commons, excepts
> > deleting this remaining link (if possible), because it can be used by
> > people like DD, precisely in the way he just did.
>
> Oversight should be able to do it.


Really?  It's a block log entry.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6de04e1545902046b599b11
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 09:16, Piotr Konieczny <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">Andrei Dombay wrote:<br>
&gt; Thank you! =C2=A0I do not need anything right now in Commons, excepts<=
br>
&gt; deleting this remaining link (if possible), because it can be used by<=
br>
&gt; people like DD, precisely in the way he just did.<br>
<br>
</div>Oversight should be able to do it.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Re=
ally? =C2=A0It&#39;s a block log entry.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>An=
dres Soolo<br>

--0016e6de04e1545902046b599b11--


--===============6638206389869209065==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6638206389869209065==--


