X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul 11 19:13:33 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0907110936g4d749368mf2e187af1506eb8c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0907110652x50262100t4905f563a92bd416@mail.gmail.com>
	<848790.6704.qm@web45107.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0907110936g4d749368mf2e187af1506eb8c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:13:18 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907111013m233e8badp2f0c92024ec22c7@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Loosemark also supported me. Yeah I think it's obvious
	that Skapperod is hoping to exploit the recent appeal and hopes to just
	stir up controversy, roll the die and hope for the best. I said so much
	in my response but then took it out - probably better not to make the
	connection in admins minds. Though if someone else brings it up then I
	will note this. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM]
	=?utf-8?q?Sneaky_blanking_by_Skapperod_in_Ko=C5=82obrzeg_ar?=
	=?utf-8?q?ticle_=28IMPORTANT=29?=
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7534206294216470450=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Loosemark also supported me. Yeah I think it's obvious
	that Skapperod is hoping to exploit the recent appeal and hopes to just
	stir up controversy, roll the die and hope for the best. I said so much
	in my response but then took it out - probably better not to make the
	connection in admins minds. Though if someone else brings it up then I
	will note this. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7534206294216470450==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636416adf89ca9e046e7134bb

--001636416adf89ca9e046e7134bb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Loosemark also supported me.

Yeah I think it's obvious that Skapperod is hoping to exploit the recent
appeal and hopes to just stir up controversy, roll the die and hope for the
best. I said so much in my response but then took it out - probably better
not to make the connection in admins minds. Though if someone else brings it
up then I will note this.

Radek


2009/7/11 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>

> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 18:19, Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> This is TOTAL BS !!!
>>
>
> Yes it is.
>
>
>> Radek I will comment on it very soon. *All our members should get
>> involved here*.
>>
>
> Let's not be too hasty.  The request is not put together too well; there's
> a good chance it'll be rejected by an administrator who thinks it's "just
> another of those silly Eastern European disputes".
>
> I recommend that the development be closely watched, and if need be, we
> should get involved over time, not all at once.
>
> However, right now, only Radek has made a statement in his support.
>  Somebody else should support him, too, to let the administrator who shows
> up know that it is not a "People v. Radek" case.
>
> If there's too much dramu, somebody like Thatcher might eventually be the
> only administrator willing to take the thread.  Somebody who thinks he
> should "do a lot of work" and then "sanction everybody who gave an evil eye
> to the canary".  Ideally, it should look like an easy case of an obviously
> frivolous complaint.  Ideally, a random passing-by administrator should not
> be shied away from this thread, and should then hastily resolve it in favour
> of Radek.  Alas, achieving that is nontrivial :-(
>
> Of course, if Jehochman shows up, generating a lot of dramu might be the
> safe approach.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--001636416adf89ca9e046e7134bb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Loosemark also supported me.<br><br>Yeah I think it&#39;s obvious that Skap=
perod is hoping to exploit the recent appeal and hopes to just stir up cont=
roversy, roll the die and hope for the best. I said so much in my response =
but then took it out - probably better not to make the connection in admins=
 minds. Though if someone else brings it up then I will note this.<br>
<br>Radek<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/11 Digwuren <span di=
r=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&=
gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px s=
olid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 18:19, Jack <span dir=3D=
"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jacurek@yahoo.com" target=3D"_blank">jacurek@ya=
hoo.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D=
"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padd=
ing-left: 1ex;">

<table border=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"0"><tbody><tr><td styl=
e=3D"font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font=
-weight: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-size-adjus=
t: inherit; font-stretch: inherit;" valign=3D"top">
<div>This is TOTAL BS !!!</div></td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote><div>=
<br></div><div>Yes it is.</div><div class=3D"im"><div><br></div><blockquote=
 class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); =
margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

<table border=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"0"><tbody><tr><td styl=
e=3D"font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font=
-weight: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-size-adjus=
t: inherit; font-stretch: inherit;" valign=3D"top">
<div><br><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt;">Radek I will comment on it very s=
oon. <b>All our members should get involved here</b>.</span></div>
</td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Let&#39;s =
not be too hasty. =A0The request is not put together too well; there&#39;s =
a good chance it&#39;ll be rejected by an administrator who thinks it&#39;s=
 &quot;just another of those silly Eastern European disputes&quot;.</div>

<div><br></div><div>I recommend that the development be closely watched, an=
d if need be, we should get involved over time, not all at once.</div><div>=
<br></div><div>However, right now, only Radek has made a statement in his s=
upport. =A0Somebody else should support him, too, to let the administrator =
who shows up know that it is not a &quot;People v. Radek&quot; case.</div>

<div><br></div><div>If there&#39;s too much dramu, somebody like Thatcher m=
ight eventually be the only administrator willing to take the thread. =A0So=
mebody who thinks he should &quot;do a lot of work&quot; and then &quot;san=
ction everybody who gave an evil eye to the canary&quot;. =A0Ideally, it sh=
ould look like an easy case of an obviously frivolous complaint. =A0Ideally=
, a random passing-by administrator should not be shied away from this thre=
ad, and should then hastily resolve it in favour of Radek. =A0Alas, achievi=
ng that is nontrivial :-(</div>

<div><br></div><div>Of course, if Jehochman shows up, generating a lot of d=
ramu might be the safe approach.</div><div><br></div></div><font color=3D"#=
888888">-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--001636416adf89ca9e046e7134bb--


--===============7534206294216470450==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7534206294216470450==--


