X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 17 21:25:35 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c90.455615b7.376a97ad@aol.com>
References: <c90.455615b7.376a97ad@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:25:21 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906171225x6d651bd8m8fc2c278f52421e1@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 22:02,
	<PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
	> Candidates I can offer: > * Offliner > * Petri Krohn > * Bloomfield >
	> In reporting, can we request an IP check against existing IPs? /p >
	Unlikely. If the checkuser is unfriendly -- and I don't think we have
	any friendly ones --, he'll call it "fishing" and decline. Besides, from
	the nearby edits, I suspect the IP would only trace to one of Starman's
	dynamic addresses, perhaps even some Starman's web proxy. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Interesting tactic by Cartel
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3910575880971316429=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 22:02, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
	> Candidates I can offer: > * Offliner > * Petri Krohn > * Bloomfield >
	> In reporting, can we request an IP check against existing IPs? /p >
	Unlikely. If the checkuser is unfriendly -- and I don't think we have
	any friendly ones --, he'll call it "fishing" and decline. Besides, from
	the nearby edits, I suspect the IP would only trace to one of Starman's
	dynamic addresses, perhaps even some Starman's web proxy. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3910575880971316429==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a2b39294f8046c904060

--001636c5a2b39294f8046c904060
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 22:02, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:

>  Candidates I can offer:
> * Offliner
> * Petri Krohn
> * Bloomfield
>
>  In reporting, can we request an IP check against existing IPs? /p
>

Unlikely.  If the checkuser is unfriendly -- and I don't think we have any
friendly ones --, he'll call it "fishing" and decline.  Besides, from the
nearby edits, I suspect the IP would only trace to one of Starman's dynamic
addresses, perhaps even some Starman's web proxy.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5a2b39294f8046c904060
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 22:02,  <span dir=3D"ltr=
">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:PetersJV@aol.com">PetersJV@aol.com</a>&gt;</span> w=
rote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid =
rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">




<div style=3D"font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;"><f=
ont color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2">
<div><blockquote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid blue; padding-left: 5px; m=
argin-left: 5px;"><font style=3D"background-color: transparent;" color=3D"#=
000000" face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>Candidate=
s I can offer:<br>
<div class=3D"im">* Offliner<br>* Petri Krohn<br>*=20
  Bloomfield<br></div></div></div><br></font></blockquote></div>
<div></div>
<div>In reporting, can we request an IP check against existing IPs?=20
/p</div></font></div></blockquote><div><br>Unlikely.=C2=A0 If the checkuser=
 is unfriendly -- and I don&#39;t think we have any friendly ones --, he&#3=
9;ll call it &quot;fishing&quot; and decline.=C2=A0 Besides, from the nearb=
y edits, I suspect the IP would only trace to one of Starman&#39;s dynamic =
addresses, perhaps even some Starman&#39;s web proxy.<br>
</div></div><br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5a2b39294f8046c904060--


--===============3910575880971316429==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3910575880971316429==--


