X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 30 23:52:40 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A4A8840.8040803@post.pl>
References: <25890ca0906281732s3836a51i757b5568dd328d63@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906290548w37de1fa2w2e2e0c4fc73e48d@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906290557v54ca84ffw6fd1bfa41726da34@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906290607n3820f96ledc8b75892a474f3@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A490AA0.4010107@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906291156y47f38354y606b28ff9640c876@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906291200w4701a20es9162d3a13509848b@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906291205q41ca8f46jb5bdeeaf0e22cf43@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906300826w3d2e7055k36965f3a3ed4729e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4A8840.8040803@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:52:30 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906301452q70e09962v271a9b21198f06ad@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I thought about that ... it's a little like setting
	myself up for further restrictions though. This is actually what I
	emailed Sandstein about. I haven't contacted the four admins you
	mentioned - I want to have a draft of what I'm going to post on AE
	before I do that just to make sure everything fits together. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appeal at AE (was: Let's give Thatcher some breathing
	space)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I thought about that ... it's a little like setting
	myself up for further restrictions though. This is actually what I
	emailed Sandstein about. I haven't contacted the four admins you
	mentioned - I want to have a draft of what I'm going to post on AE
	before I do that just to make sure everything fits together. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I thought about that ... it's a little like setting myself up for
further restrictions though. This is actually what I emailed Sandstein
about.

I haven't contacted the four admins you mentioned - I want to have a
draft of what I'm going to post on AE before I do that just to make
sure everything fits together.

Radek


2009/6/30 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:

>>
>> Is there a precedent that I can use as a template?
>
> Not sure about that, but you may want to structure it as a request to
> enforce a ruling against yourself :) Use the diff Thatcher cited on your
> talkpage as evidence, use the EE arbitration as the case, and so on -
> and than have your explanation of what he did, why you think he
> overkilled you, and how you are asking for another AE admin to review this.
>
> Make sure you have clear sections for neutral admin discussion, and for
> expected-to-be dramu by Offliner and others :) It would be bad if they
> would dramu your request into something annoying.
>
> Have you contacted neutral admins by email asking them for review, as I
> suggested? Any replies from Shelly or anybody else?
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

