X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jul 11 21:04:39 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A58E23B.4090206@post.pl>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:04:27 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <571846.28820.qm@web45111.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <571846.28820.qm@web45111.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
X-Spam_score: -1.5
X-Spam_score_int: -14
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Jack wrote: > Yea, you guys right, I tend to react too
	quickly. But Skapperod need to > be dealt with eventually. Agreed. How
	are we doing on RfC? I think Molobo had the draft? It would be a good
	idea to upload it somewhere where we can all work on it... if we cannot
	get a wiki of our own to work, what about google docs? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-1.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	-0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM]
 =?utf-8?q?Sneaky_blanking_by_Skapperod_in_Ko=C5=82obrzeg_ar?=
 =?utf-8?q?ticle_=28IMPORTANT=29?=
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -1.5
X-Spam_score_int: -14
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Jack wrote: > Yea, you guys right, I tend to react too
	quickly. But Skapperod need to > be dealt with eventually. Agreed. How
	are we doing on RfC? I think Molobo had the draft? It would be a good
	idea to upload it somewhere where we can all work on it... if we cannot
	get a wiki of our own to work, what about google docs? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-1.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	-0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Jack wrote:
> Yea, you guys right, I tend to react too quickly. But Skapperod need to 
> be dealt with eventually.

Agreed. How are we doing on RfC? I think Molobo had the draft? It would 
be a good idea to upload it somewhere where we can all work on it... if 
we cannot get a wiki of our own to work, what about google docs?

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

