X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:14:34 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211410w74194a4fi69f89ae4116ad6d8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211403v2e2b9beep263b646b1188bd4e@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211406l280b7081w8bdd6aa9264193da@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211410w74194a4fi69f89ae4116ad6d8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:14:07 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211414m3e911be3pa3e8d1e903b40c01@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Sure (though, given my limited time,
	I was trying to fly
	this one under the radar) - but where exactly, since this has spread and
	there's talk of places only admins can comment. Also I think Piotrus
	should first innocently inquire about what exactly is going on here?
	Just act puzzled and surprised and disappointed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Sure (though, given my limited time, I was trying to fly
	this one under the radar) - but where exactly, since this has spread and
	there's talk of places only admins can comment. Also I think Piotrus
	should first innocently inquire about what exactly is going on here?
	Just act puzzled and surprised and disappointed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Sure (though, given my limited time, I was trying to fly this one
under the radar) - but where exactly, since this has spread and
there's talk of places only admins can comment. Also I think Piotrus
should first innocently inquire about what exactly is going on here?
Just act puzzled and surprised and disappointed.

Radek


2009/6/21 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:06, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I still think the idea that an administrator can threaten another
>> administrator by banning him from AE is worth bringing to some sort of m=
ass
>> scrutiny. Nobody cares what a power-hungry administrator does in a little
>> ethnopolitical content war, but when an administrator starts threatening
>> other administrators, yet other administrators can easily empathise. This
>> might be the undoing of Jehochman, given enough time.
>
> Piotrus can't do it himself without creating needless sidedramu. =A0Radek=
, do
> you think you could bring this issue to a general administrators' forum?
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

