X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jun 20 22:14:38 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0906201203s394948s4228e33c3e0cd150@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0906201203s394948s4228e33c3e0cd150@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:14:27 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906201314u506cbbdbhb300282e944d5580@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 22:03, Molobo Molobo
	<molobus@gmail.com> wrote: > The claim that because charges are dropped
	information about them > should be removed is not something regularly
	done on Wikipedia. > Consider similiar case with Christian Bale-while
	the charges were > dropped information stayed. Why should Aron be
	treated different ? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Aron Bielski/Christian Bale
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2302383480572114512=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 22:03, Molobo Molobo
	<molobus@gmail.com> wrote: > The claim that because charges are dropped
	information about them > should be removed is not something regularly
	done on Wikipedia. > Consider similiar case with Christian Bale-while
	the charges were > dropped information stayed. Why should Aron be
	treated different ? [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2302383480572114512==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd8d49b6e902046ccd49dc

--0016e6dd8d49b6e902046ccd49dc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 22:03, Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> wrote:

> The claim that because charges are dropped information about them
> should be removed is not something regularly done on Wikipedia.
> Consider similiar case with Christian Bale-while the charges were
> dropped information stayed. Why should Aron be treated different ?


I have no idea about the articles in question.  Thus, by Wikipedia's
standards, I'm evidently qualified to offer advice.

Charges being dropped is sometimes an indication that they were brought by
mistake in the first place.  Unless the charges themselves have become
notable in their own right, it makes sense for an encyclop=C3=A6dia to skip=
 them,
or only mention them very briefly.  In Wikipedia's terms, undue weight to
charges that have been dropped may constitute a BLP violation.

Unfortunately, if charges are notable or not is considerably vague a
subject, depend to a lot of editorial discretion.

--=20
Andres Soolo

--0016e6dd8d49b6e902046ccd49dc
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 22:03, Molobo Molobo <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:molobus@gmail.com">molobus@gmail.com</=
a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0=
 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
The claim that because charges are dropped information about them<br>
should be removed is not something regularly done on Wikipedia.<br>
Consider similiar case with Christian Bale-while the charges were<br>
dropped information stayed. Why should Aron be treated different ?</blockqu=
ote><div><br></div><div>I have no idea about the articles in question. =C2=
=A0Thus, by Wikipedia&#39;s standards, I&#39;m evidently qualified to offer=
 advice.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Charges being dropped is sometimes an indication that t=
hey were brought by mistake in the first place. =C2=A0Unless the charges th=
emselves have become notable in their own right, it makes sense for an ency=
clop=C3=A6dia to skip them, or only mention them very briefly. =C2=A0In Wik=
ipedia&#39;s terms, undue weight to charges that have been dropped may cons=
titute a BLP violation.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Unfortunately, if charges are notable or not is conside=
rably vague a subject, depend to a lot of editorial discretion.</div><div><=
br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--0016e6dd8d49b6e902046ccd49dc--


--===============2302383480572114512==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2302383480572114512==--


