X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 29 15:31:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A48C2AA.3020303@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:33:30 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <25890ca0906281732s3836a51i757b5568dd328d63@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880906281902n56be257ao44cc951550f8b1e9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880906281902n56be257ao44cc951550f8b1e9@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Martin wrote: > I thought your restriction was six
	months? Anyway, I'd appeal to > ArbCom via RFAR, (and mention Colchicum
	in your appeal). As I mentioned before, I'd try AE first. If AE works, 
	there is no need to go to RFAR; but you cannot really try it the other
	way around, since what arbcommers say at RFAR superceed what admins say
	at AE. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Appeal at AE (was: Let's give Thatcher some
	breathing	space)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Martin wrote: > I thought your restriction was six
	months? Anyway, I'd appeal to > ArbCom via RFAR, (and mention Colchicum
	in your appeal). As I mentioned before, I'd try AE first. If AE works,
	there is no need to go to RFAR; but you cannot really try it the other
	way around, since what arbcommers say at RFAR superceed what admins say
	at AE. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Martin wrote:
> I thought your restriction was six months? Anyway, I'd appeal to
> ArbCom via RFAR, (and mention Colchicum in your appeal).

As I mentioned before, I'd try AE first. If AE works, there is no need 
to go to RFAR; but you cannot really try it the other way around, since 
what arbcommers say at RFAR superceed what admins say at AE.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

