X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  8 14:33:00 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:32:46 +0300
Message-ID: <4fbe29dd0906080532g1a082d0ej7c91f03b8628a86e@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?U2FuZGVyIFPDpGRl?= <sander.sade@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 1.5
X-Spam_score_int: 15
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hello, I had a bit of time, so I decided to do my own
	tool to compare diurnal editing cycles. Right now it runs only in my
	own
	machine - I'll try to find a website to host it later this week - I did
	it in ASP.NET and my current host runs only PHP; also a general cleanup
	of the graph format and code is needed. It is reasonably fast - roughly
	ten seconds with 3000 last edits from both users. I can speed it up by
	threading the queries, but I don't think that is really needed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	1.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24 BODY: HTML: images with 2000-2400 bytes of words
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] Diurnal cycle tool
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1884672050554392895=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.9
X-Spam_score_int: 29
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Hello, I had a bit of time, so I decided to do my own
	tool to compare diurnal editing cycles. Right now it runs only in my own
	machine - I'll try to find a website to host it later this week - I did
	it in ASP.NET and my current host runs only PHP; also a general cleanup
	of the graph format and code is needed. It is reasonably fast - roughly
	ten seconds with 3000 last edits from both users. I can speed it up by
	threading the queries, but I don't think that is really needed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.9 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	1.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24     BODY: HTML: images with 2000-2400 bytes of words
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4206]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-1.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1884672050554392895==
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary=0016364c76f57b270b046bd570bd

--0016364c76f57b270b046bd570bd
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c76f57b2706046bd570bc

--0016364c76f57b2706046bd570bc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,

I had a bit of time, so I decided to do my own tool to compare diurnal
editing cycles. Right now it runs only in my own machine - I'll try to find
a website to host it later this week - I did it in ASP.NET and my current
host runs only PHP; also a general cleanup of the graph format and code is
needed. It is reasonably fast - roughly ten seconds with 3000 last edits
from both users. I can speed it up by threading the queries, but I don't
think that is really needed.

[image: PasswordUsernameRJCG.png]
As you can see, PU and RJ CG seem to have rather different diurnal cycle -
however, see the strangely stable activity of PU. No downtime whatsoever!
Now that is a dedication.

[image: PU_Russavia.png]
Let's compare PU and Russavia - I think the similarity is obvious.

[image: RJCG_FeelSunny.png]
Our beloved FeelSunny has a bit different editing pattern than even more
loved RJ CG. However, if one is from Moscow and the other is in Toronto...
the time difference doesn't add up (especially the start of low activity -
sleep). More likely is that he finished high-school and went to a university
- or went to work. Also, seasonal time change is a possibility.

[image: DigwurenMe.png]
And finally, time to prove for once and for all that Digwuren is but my
sock! Ha! You didn't guess that, did you? :P

If you want images from other user/users, please let me know and I'll run
the tool.

Sander

--0016364c76f57b2706046bd570bc
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,<br>
<br>
I had a bit of time, so I decided to do my own tool to compare diurnal
editing cycles. Right now it runs only in my own machine - I&#39;ll try to
find a website to host it later this week - I did it in <a href=3D"http://A=
SP.NET">ASP.NET</a> and my
current host runs only PHP; also a general cleanup of the graph format
and code is needed. It is reasonably fast - roughly ten seconds with
3000 last edits from both users. I can speed it up by threading the
queries, but I don&#39;t think that is really needed.<br><br><img title=3D"=
PasswordUsernameRJCG.png" alt=3D"PasswordUsernameRJCG.png" src=3D"https://m=
ail.google.com/mail/?ui=3D2&amp;ik=3Dcb831b0ba4&amp;view=3Datt&amp;th=3D121=
bfd0550bba3bc&amp;attid=3D0.3&amp;disp=3Dattd&amp;realattid=3Dii_121bfcc2a5=
0b3622&amp;zw"><br>
As you can see, PU and RJ CG seem to have rather different diurnal cycle - =
however, see the strangely stable activity of PU. No downtime whatsoever! N=
ow that is a dedication.<br><br><img title=3D"PU_Russavia.png" alt=3D"PU_Ru=
ssavia.png" src=3D"https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=3D2&amp;ik=3Dcb831b0ba4=
&amp;view=3Datt&amp;th=3D121bfd0fc5009ebb&amp;attid=3D0.2&amp;disp=3Dattd&a=
mp;realattid=3Dii_121bfcebb3647b39&amp;zw"><br>
Let&#39;s compare PU and Russavia - I think the similarity is obvious.<br><=
br><img title=3D"RJCG_FeelSunny.png" alt=3D"RJCG_FeelSunny.png" src=3D"http=
s://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=3D2&amp;ik=3Dcb831b0ba4&amp;view=3Datt&amp;th=
=3D121bfd332a8c278f&amp;attid=3D0.2&amp;disp=3Dattd&amp;realattid=3Dii_121b=
fd2e2b9c6281&amp;zw"><br>
Our beloved FeelSunny has a bit different editing pattern than even more lo=
ved RJ CG. However, if one is from Moscow and the other is in Toronto... th=
e time difference doesn&#39;t add up (especially the start of low activity =
- sleep). More likely is that he finished high-school and went to a univers=
ity - or went to work. Also, seasonal time change is a possibility.<br>
<br><img title=3D"DigwurenMe.png" alt=3D"DigwurenMe.png" src=3D"cid:ii_121b=
fd77e5e22560"><br>And finally, time to prove for once and for all that Digw=
uren is but my sock! Ha! You didn&#39;t guess that, did you? :P<br><br>If y=
ou want images from other user/users, please let me know and I&#39;ll run t=
he tool.<br>
<br>Sander<br><br><br>

--0016364c76f57b2706046bd570bc--
--0016364c76f57b270b046bd570bd
Content-Type: image/png; name="DigwurenMe.png"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: <ii_121bfd77e5e22560>
X-Attachment-Id: ii_121bfd77e5e22560

[encoded data, 29180 characters]
--0016364c76f57b270b046bd570bd--


--===============1884672050554392895==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1884672050554392895==--


