X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Apr 10 04:07:15 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <49DE6AF4.2050608@post.pl>
References: <929ed1ec0904091308v7f156a6fmd0bae6ae8b6ba60b@mail.gmail.com>
	<49DE6AF4.2050608@post.pl>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:06:57 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880904091906p1735adbew9c29c4b8a618233c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  It's up to Andres to decide,
	it is his creation. Martin
	On 4/10/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: > In August, I will
	be presenting in an academic conference on tools for > collection and
	analysis of Wikipedia statistics. In a run up to that, I > will be
	updating http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tools and > relevant
	pages, and I would very much like to see the wikipedometer > listed
	there :) > > I don't think there are any reasons not to list it there
	now...? > > -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about Wikipedia is,
	that it just works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Time for the wikipedometer to go public?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  It's up to Andres to decide, it is his creation. Martin
	On 4/10/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: > In August, I will
	be presenting in an academic conference on tools for > collection and
	analysis of Wikipedia statistics. In a run up to that, I > will be
	updating http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tools and > relevant
	pages, and I would very much like to see the wikipedometer > listed
	there :) > > I don't think there are any reasons not to list it there
	now...? > > -- > Piotr Konieczny > > "The problem about Wikipedia is,
	that it just works in reality, not in > theory." > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0020]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

It's up to Andres to decide, it is his creation.

Martin

On 4/10/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
> In August, I will be presenting in an academic conference on tools for
> collection and analysis of Wikipedia statistics. In a run up to that, I
> will be updating http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tools and
> relevant pages, and I would very much like to see the wikipedometer
> listed there :)
>
> I don't think there are any reasons not to list it there now...?
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

