X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Sep  4 04:05:03 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <207474.55938.qm@web32802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: pNw67pAVM1mbHrwkSahoDHL_kov1zSElGdI_zFqSb23Rs4nVa2BqBaCjiThyu2uzZC6UFTUV6fkSG6YWz2Osz3tr8gsjuFrMRXNhpSf.W61A1Sgt8cps1l0n12zk2cLwKJJWcxHG9caFdYfnTgg5gLRJd2VsZqYAWzbnGcPWlWqdHmpM336gp7TWam6tEbfyFXKOpsAbZjdQ5vosNptEvhyckUi0QyNrEjFtHqzjl2qSJQG9B.Q4UJt2T_hhJjgE2KLTsLgl0xU3oG8dM8dgD.i5uPsTMK3e0M9y7GN47aPmmsuesW6coMoG_TAh7ON5MhNNXoyDZP9lpQFT8Nqpsouaf25nYqklVZQWTuR3EuNNp_kkotjOpBp9Ei6.0RDr4z0-
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/6.1.2 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AA06D75.8000501@post.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I am totally be OK with Loosmark,
	but I do not know what
	other, non-Polish users here think of it. I mean, it might turn into a
	Polish club. Tymek --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
	wrote: [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] LOOSMARK should be invited here.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3967224068410930774=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I am totally be OK with Loosmark, but I do not know what
	other, non-Polish users here think of it. I mean, it might turn into a
	Polish club. Tymek --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
	wrote: [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3967224068410930774==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-182033306-1252029891=:55938"

--0-182033306-1252029891=:55938
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am totally be OK with Loosmark, but I do not know what other, non-Polish =
users here think of it. I mean, it might turn into a Polish club.
=A0
Tymek

--- On Thu, 9/3/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:


From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
Subject: Re: [WPM] LOOSMARK should be invited here.
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 8:29 PM


Jack wrote:
> What do you guys think?

We discussed this a month ago or so. The problem is - we don't know=20
anything about him. And he is relatively new. Can we trust him? I don't=20
think that he is a plant :) But are we sure he would not reveal the=20
existence of this list with an ill-thought comment?


--=20
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=20
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
=0A=0A=0A      
--0-182033306-1252029891=:55938
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;"><DIV>I am totally be OK with Loosmark, but I =
do not know what other, non-Polish users here think of it. I mean, it might=
 turn into a Polish club.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Tymek<BR><BR>--- On <B>Thu, 9/3/09, Piotr Konieczny <I>&lt;piokon@post=
.pl&gt;</I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(=
16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: Piotr Konieczny &lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;<BR>S=
ubject: Re: [WPM] LOOSMARK should be invited here.<BR>To: "Wikipedia statis=
tics" &lt;folks@wikipedometer.net&gt;<BR>Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009,=
 8:29 PM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=3DplainMail>Jack wrote:<BR>&gt; What do you guys think?<BR><BR>W=
e discussed this a month ago or so. The problem is - we don't know <BR>anyt=
hing about him. And he is relatively new. Can we trust him? I don't <BR>thi=
nk that he is a plant :) But are we sure he would not reveal the <BR>existe=
nce of this list with an ill-thought comment?<BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>Piotr Konie=
czny<BR><BR>"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality,=
 not in <BR>theory."<BR><BR>_______________________________________________=
<BR>Wikipedia statistics discussion list<BR><A href=3D"http://us.mc328.mail=
.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=3Dfolks@wikipedometer.net" ymailto=3D"mailto:folks=
@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</A><BR><A href=3D"http://wikipe=
dometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=3D_blank>http://wikipedo=
meter.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></t=
r></table><br>=0A=0A=0A=0A      
--0-182033306-1252029891=:55938--


--===============3967224068410930774==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3967224068410930774==--


