X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Jan  3 13:43:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0901030443i19d35519of1f379435ab59b04@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:43:38 +0200
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880901030035h2e0a050ka88ce15930146118@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4f045a880901030035h2e0a050ka88ce15930146118@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:35, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > I've noticed this >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petri_Krohn&diff=261247662&oldid=261196671
	> > Should we be concerned about ScienceApologist taking up Petri's POV
	pushing > agenda? > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] ScienceApologist
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5899746285400101079=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:35, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > I've noticed this >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petri_Krohn&diff=261247662&oldid=261196671
	> > Should we be concerned about ScienceApologist taking up Petri's POV
	pushing > agenda? > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0050]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5899746285400101079==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_142682_19371806.1230986618906"

------=_Part_142682_19371806.1230986618906
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:35, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've noticed this
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petri_Krohn&diff=261247662&oldid=261196671
>
> Should we be concerned about ScienceApologist taking up Petri's POV pushing
> agenda?
>

Unlikely.  I've found ScienceApologist to behave in quite a reasonable
manner; it wouldn't be like him to start pushing Petri Krohn's agenda on his
say-so without reliable sources -- and those PK does not have.

-- 
Andres Soolo

------=_Part_142682_19371806.1230986618906
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:35, Martin <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:martint20@gmail.com">martint20@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>I&#39;ve noticed this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petri_Krohn&amp;diff=261247662&amp;oldid=261196671" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petri_Krohn&amp;diff=261247662&amp;oldid=261196671</a></div>


<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Should we be concerned about ScienceApologist taking up Petri&#39;s POV pushing agenda?</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Unlikely. &nbsp;I&#39;ve found ScienceApologist to behave in quite a reasonable manner; it wouldn&#39;t be like him to start pushing Petri Krohn&#39;s agenda on his say-so without reliable sources -- and those PK does not have.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

------=_Part_142682_19371806.1230986618906--


--===============5899746285400101079==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5899746285400101079==--


