X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jul 20 01:01:36 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A63A5AA.7080808@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:00:58 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <4A634D50.9060502@post.pl>	<929ed1ec0907190947h8aea7e7x4feb9514b1c367a2@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70907191014r65ce8863gd455a351199b8921@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6fb557d70907191014r65ce8863gd455a351199b8921@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote: >
	''Councils''
	that Wikipedia needs are the ones that would include > editors who have
	proven a few qualities necessary for writing an > encyclopeda, e.g.
	having demonstrated expertise in the fields they are > mostly
	contributing to, and having more objective, non-ideological > approach
	to writing there. > > Such a ''council'' should have nothing to do with
	the present admindom > and arbitration committee, which are random sets
	of people who have > been able to grab enough votes - being most likely
	lackluster > bureaucrats and conformists, who can get anyone's votes if
	necessary. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Advisory Council formed alongside ArbCom - invitations
 secret...
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote: > ''Councils''
	that Wikipedia needs are the ones that would include > editors who have
	proven a few qualities necessary for writing an > encyclopeda, e.g.
	having demonstrated expertise in the fields they are > mostly
	contributing to, and having more objective, non-ideological > approach
	to writing there. > > Such a ''council'' should have nothing to do with
	the present admindom > and arbitration committee, which are random sets
	of people who have > been able to grab enough votes - being most likely
	lackluster > bureaucrats and conformists, who can get anyone's votes if
	necessary. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote:
> ''Councils'' that Wikipedia needs are the ones that would include
> editors who have proven a few qualities  necessary for writing an
> encyclopeda, e.g. having demonstrated expertise in the fields they are
> mostly contributing to, and having more objective, non-ideological
> approach to writing there.
> 
> Such a ''council'' should have nothing to do with the present admindom
> and arbitration committee, which are random sets of people who have
> been able  to grab enough votes - being most likely  lackluster
> bureaucrats and conformists, who can get anyone's votes if necessary.

Feel free to post it on the council talk page :) I think it is a valid 
thought.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

