X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Apr  8 02:20:20 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <49DBD9B5.7080703@post.pl>
References: <49D6F9F8.3030603@post.pl> <49DA4A96.40806@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0904061136n4070fa1eg3a31d606a7bba79a@mail.gmail.com>
	<49DADE35.5090707@post.pl>
	<4f045a880904070030o4275f21g98ba9f0874534464@mail.gmail.com>
	<49DB7D57.8020307@post.pl>
	<4f045a880904071542w4f9aed3exedb4c146d3f8b0d2@mail.gmail.com>
	<49DBD9B5.7080703@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:20:00 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880904071720y6f8c3856i703e35ec4f877ef@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Martin wrote: > >> Too bad you didn't think
	to
	use your admin powers to close that 3RR >> report against myself as
	stale, they were already almost a day old by >> the time you left your
	comment: >>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=281361891&oldid=281361644
	>> Too bad I didn't think to ask you myself to close it while the case
	>> was still open. >> >> Can't cry over missed opportunities I suppose.
	> > I didn't realize it was stale, but I didn't think the block was
	likely > :( We really need more admins on our teams, I have already once
	been > accused of doing favors on ANI/3RR, we need more people to be
	able to > step in. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon versus Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Martin wrote: > >> Too bad you didn't think to
	use your admin powers to close that 3RR >> report against myself as
	stale, they were already almost a day old by >> the time you left your
	comment: >>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=281361891&oldid=281361644
	>> Too bad I didn't think to ask you myself to close it while the case
	>> was still open. >> >> Can't cry over missed opportunities I suppose.
	> > I didn't realize it was stale, but I didn't think the block was
	likely > :( We really need more admins on our teams, I have already once
	been > accused of doing favors on ANI/3RR, we need more people to be
	able to > step in. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
> Martin wrote:
>
>> Too bad you didn't think to use your admin powers to close that 3RR
>> report against myself as stale, they were already almost a day old by
>> the time you left your comment:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=281361891&oldid=281361644
>> Too bad I didn't think to ask you myself to close it while the case
>> was still open.
>>
>> Can't cry over missed opportunities I suppose.
>
> I didn't realize it was stale, but I didn't think the block was likely
> :( We really need more admins on our teams, I have already once been
> accused of doing favors on ANI/3RR, we need more people to be able to
> step in.

I didn't expect a block either. I've been thinking about adminship,
but the my block log will make it that little bit harder now, as my
opponents will no doubt exploit that point to undermine any requests.

Can block logs be expunged, do admins have the tools to do this? I may
be able to convince the blocking admin to do this if it is possible
technically.

Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

