X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Aug 21 02:39:57 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0908201648k4e82427ald40670e4373ff72@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0908190732o7be5947ey2741cb6ba8dd742d@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0908201648k4e82427ald40670e4373ff72@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:39:52 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0908201739obe23bdakf404e4de5192beed@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Thanks! For this one I'm gonna hold off. I'm pretty
	sure
	the anon is Lokyz and the fake "German nationalist" could very well be
	Dr. Dan but these hunches are not enough for the report unless the sock
	activity continues. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] check user
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4479446554761139739=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Thanks! For this one I'm gonna hold off. I'm pretty sure
	the anon is Lokyz and the fake "German nationalist" could very well be
	Dr. Dan but these hunches are not enough for the report unless the sock
	activity continues. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4479446554761139739==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65aeee03c37e704719c1b92

--0016e65aeee03c37e704719c1b92
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks! For this one I'm gonna hold off. I'm pretty sure the anon is Lokyz
and the fake "German nationalist" could very well be Dr. Dan but these
hunches are not enough for the report unless the sock activity continues.

Radek

2009/8/20 Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>

> I just came back from a few day trip and can respond.
>
>
>
>
> Do I have to justify a request for it and if so with how much detail?
>
>
> Yes, you should. The details should be convincing enough if possible. Do
> not forget the "letter code" of violation.
>
>
>> Should I list whom I want the anon checked "against"?
>
>
> Yes, absolutely.
>
>
>> Is there a cost to including a name or two extra (to make sure)? Is there
>> a potential downside - I'm sure someone will scream "hounding" or something,
>> but is there a danger here?
>
>
> Do not file CU case, unless you are really sure if at least one of them is
> a sock. There is no cost if the first of listed suspects was justified well
> enough. However, do not list anyone,
> who you  think was most probably not him. Any obvious "fishing" will
> decrease your credibility.
>
> Andrei
>
>
>>
>>
>> Radek
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0016e65aeee03c37e704719c1b92
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks! For this one I&#39;m gonna hold off. I&#39;m pretty sure the anon i=
s Lokyz and the fake &quot;German nationalist&quot; could very well be Dr. =
Dan but these hunches are not enough for the report unless the sock activit=
y continues.<br>
<br>Radek<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/8/20 Andrei Dombay <span d=
ir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com">wikibiophys@gmail.c=
om</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left=
: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1e=
x;">
I just came back from a few day trip and can respond.<br><br><br><br><div c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im"><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote=
" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0=
.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

Do I have to justify a request for it and if so with how much detail? </blo=
ckquote></div><div><br>Yes, you should. The details should be convincing en=
ough if possible. Do not forget the &quot;letter code&quot; of violation.<b=
r>

=A0</div><div class=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"borde=
r-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-le=
ft: 1ex;">Should I list whom I want the anon checked &quot;against&quot;? <=
/blockquote>
</div><div><br>
Yes, absolutely.<br>=A0</div><div class=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_q=
uote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0=
pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Is there a cost to including a name or two ex=
tra (to make sure)? Is there a potential downside - I&#39;m sure someone wi=
ll scream &quot;hounding&quot; or something, but is there a danger here?</b=
lockquote>

</div><div><br>Do not file CU case, unless you are really sure if at least =
one of them is a sock. There is no cost if the first of listed suspects was=
 justified well enough. However, do not list anyone,<br>who you=A0 think wa=
s most probably not him. Any obvious &quot;fishing&quot; will decrease your=
 credibility.<br>

<br>Andrei <br>=A0<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"bord=
er-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-l=
eft: 1ex;"><br><font color=3D"#888888">
<br>Radek<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net" target=3D"_blank">folks@wikipedo=
meter.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e65aeee03c37e704719c1b92--


--===============4479446554761139739==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4479446554761139739==--


