X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Apr 28 07:08:51 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <739313.85820.qm@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <739313.85820.qm@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:08:35 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880904272208g7305da68w9028727b183ca836@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Given that 90% of internet traffic gets routed through
	the USA, try writing a series of messages about your plans to conduct
	Jihad on US soil, see what happens ; o) On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:26 PM,
	Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote: > OK, so no
	psychological warfare - I understand the message. It was a crazy > idea
	conceived at 3 am when I should have been asleep. I just hope ArbCom >
	doesn't receive that letter. In my defence, it was only a notion that
	never > advanced beyond a single message. > Still, I find it outrageous
	(though not wholly unsurprising) that a > dictatorship is perverting
	the
	encyclopedia to fit its propaganda message, > and I hope the champions
	of neutrality eventually emerge triumphant. > By the way, who else is
	using Wikipedia for propaganda? We know the CIA has > edited, but I'm
	not sure what articles. How about the Chinese? I have a > vague
	impression that there are some very pro-PRC editors, but also >
	anti-Communist ones from Taiwan, Hong Kong & overseas. It would be >
	interesting to compare how Russia and China differ in their approach to
	> spreading propaganda on Wikipedia. > Belarus might be another
	interesting case, especially as Lukashenka's > relations with Russia
	cool. Venezuela and Iran probably have enough Western > apologists not
	to have to worry about spending their own money for > propaganda. And
	North Korea? > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list >
	folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] China?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Given that 90% of internet traffic gets routed through
	the USA, try writing a series of messages about your plans to conduct
	Jihad on US soil, see what happens ;o) On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:26 PM,
	Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote: > OK, so no
	psychological warfare - I understand the message. It was a crazy > idea
	conceived at 3 am when I should have been asleep. I just hope ArbCom >
	doesn't receive that letter. In my defence, it was only a notion that
	never > advanced beyond a single message. > Still, I find it outrageous
	(though not wholly unsurprising) that a > dictatorship is perverting the
	encyclopedia to fit its propaganda message, > and I hope the champions
	of neutrality eventually emerge triumphant. > By the way, who else is
	using Wikipedia for propaganda? We know the CIA has > edited, but I'm
	not sure what articles. How about the Chinese? I have a > vague
	impression that there are some very pro-PRC editors, but also >
	anti-Communist ones from Taiwan, Hong Kong & overseas. It would be >
	interesting to compare how Russia and China differ in their approach to
	> spreading propaganda on Wikipedia. > Belarus might be another
	interesting case, especially as Lukashenka's > relations with Russia
	cool. Venezuela and Iran probably have enough Western > apologists not
	to have to worry about spending their own money for > propaganda. And
	North Korea? > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list >
	folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Given that 90% of internet traffic gets routed through the USA, try
writing a series of messages about your plans to conduct Jihad on US
soil, see what happens ;o)


On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Christian Suciu
<christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> OK, so no psychological warfare - I understand the message. It was a crazy
> idea conceived at 3 am when I should have been asleep. I just hope ArbCom
> doesn't receive that letter. In my defence, it was only a notion that never
> advanced beyond a single message.
> Still, I find it outrageous (though not wholly unsurprising) that a
> dictatorship is perverting the encyclopedia to fit its propaganda message,
> and I hope the champions of neutrality eventually emerge triumphant.
> By the way, who else is using Wikipedia for propaganda? We know the CIA has
> edited, but I'm not sure what articles. How about the Chinese? I have a
> vague impression that there are some very pro-PRC editors, but also
> anti-Communist ones from Taiwan, Hong Kong & overseas. It would be
> interesting to compare how Russia and China differ in their approach to
> spreading propaganda on Wikipedia.
> Belarus might be another interesting case, especially as Lukashenka's
> relations with Russia cool. Venezuela and Iran probably have enough Western
> apologists not to have to worry about spending their own money for
> propaganda. And North Korea?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

