X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Sep 13 22:14:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4AAD3AF5.70903@post.pl>
References: <4AAD3AF5.70903@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:14:38 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0909131314q6f016301nc94a855825e604c7@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.4
X-Spam_score_int: -3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Although I objected, whatever you and others decide is
	fine. My problem is lack of time and wikipedia addiction (as I just
	noted in response to Radek), and I am going to fight this addiction. On
	Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] We brigades,
	Internet operations by Russian secret police 	and POLAND
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4737824911677352936=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Although I objected, whatever you and others decide is
	fine. My problem is lack of time and wikipedia addiction (as I just
	noted in response to Radek), and I am going to fight this addiction. On
	Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.9 SUBJ_HAS_SPACES        Subject contains lots of white space
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4737824911677352936==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325554a66daa66304737b32e8

--000325554a66daa66304737b32e8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Although I objected, whatever you and others decide is fine. My problem is
lack of time and wikipedia addiction (as I just noted in response to Radek),
and I am going to fight this addiction.



On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> @Polish editors: please make sure that the section about Poland is not
> weaseled, the Cartel tries to do by adding irrelevant long quotes and such
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Web_brigades&action=history
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Web_brigades#Marian_Kaluski
>
> @Everyone: I've proposed the merger; I see that it was opposed before
> but I am sorry - those articles sound very similar, cover similar
> issues, and are really content forks. Merging them will make it easier
> to defend them - I suggested the merger when one of the Cartel members
> (sic!) pointed out that the Polish section is duplicated verbatim in
> both, and this is a nice illustration of why they are forked.
>
> We can discuss the best title, whether to keep all the content, and
> such, but I do think that we should support the merger here.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Web_brigades#Merge._again
>
> Lastly: recently somebody noted Russian internet operations in Czech
> Republic? Why is this not mentioned in the article? Why stuff like
> Stalin in Moscow Metro are mentioned here but nobody bothers to add them
> to Wikipedia? I find this annoying. If you find something, try to add
> this to the wiki first, than discuss it here, not the other way around.
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--000325554a66daa66304737b32e8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<br>Although I objected, whatever you and others decide is fine. My problem is lack of time and wikipedia addiction (as I just noted in response to Radek), and I am going to fight this addiction.<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Piotr Konieczny <span dir="ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
@Polish editors: please make sure that the section about Poland is not<br>
weaseled, the Cartel tries to do by adding irrelevant long quotes and such<br>
<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Web_brigades&amp;action=history" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Web_brigades&amp;action=history</a><br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Web_brigades#Marian_Kaluski" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Web_brigades#Marian_Kaluski</a><br>
<br>
@Everyone: I&#39;ve proposed the merger; I see that it was opposed before<br>
but I am sorry - those articles sound very similar, cover similar<br>
issues, and are really content forks. Merging them will make it easier<br>
to defend them - I suggested the merger when one of the Cartel members<br>
(sic!) pointed out that the Polish section is duplicated verbatim in<br>
both, and this is a nice illustration of why they are forked.<br>
<br>
We can discuss the best title, whether to keep all the content, and<br>
such, but I do think that we should support the merger here.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Web_brigades#Merge._again" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Web_brigades#Merge._again</a><br>
<br>
Lastly: recently somebody noted Russian internet operations in Czech<br>
Republic? Why is this not mentioned in the article? Why stuff like<br>
Stalin in Moscow Metro are mentioned here but nobody bothers to add them<br>
to Wikipedia? I find this annoying. If you find something, try to add<br>
this to the wiki first, than discuss it here, not the other way around.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Piotr Konieczny<br>
<br>
&quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in<br>
theory.&quot;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href="mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href="http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target="_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>

--000325554a66daa66304737b32e8--


--===============4737824911677352936==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4737824911677352936==--


