X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Sep  3 23:09:12 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <456037.82466.qm@web45112.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: qEIWZ0sVM1l3ENKE9YwIAvCqW.c3TlT9w1FojVfanjfz.exFER_gidAL1N3wmfIcJCZkhn1n1L.Kr3dtEKIz9JuOloVCd_ZPIzn_VXYAZILLcUytX3MHo1lw7jAP6zJTehNREI0NJ_5dQv_4x2ffc0oMSY.CfD7PsWrkwMXtdIT.B0Oqq5ubT8Vg7IDWXICC3QtePj2luQ8ruky8CmVaYPbyoOdSCSImc6vshu1GHv9twcfTD95Mg7N3CsxAyw1qJ3o-
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/6.1.2 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 14:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AA023BF.2040907@post.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Thanks Piotrus for the comments in my defence on
	Tachers
	page, I'm not sure if you checked, but I follow your advice already and
	I did only up to 2 reverts per article reverting that anon. Suricane
	"the ass wipe" has no grounds, he is just trying to manipulate
	administrators right now. Hope this will end now but we should collect
	evidence on Suricane because he will do it again. I just know
	that.Thanks again for the support. Jacek --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Piotr
	Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,
	SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM]
 =?iso-8859-1?q?Is_Sciurin=E6_sanctioned=3F=3F_Do_we_have_an?=
 =?iso-8859-1?q?ything_on_him=3F=3F?=
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0531177917629759398=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Thanks Piotrus for the comments in my defence on Tachers
	page, I'm not sure if you checked, but I follow your advice already and
	I did only up to 2 reverts per article reverting that anon. Suricane
	"the ass wipe" has no grounds, he is just trying to manipulate
	administrators right now. Hope this will end now but we should collect
	evidence on Suricane because he will do it again. I just know
	that.Thanks again for the support. Jacek --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Piotr
	Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0531177917629759398==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-804878483-1252012125=:82466"

--0-804878483-1252012125=:82466
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Piotrus for the comments in my defence on Tachers page, I'm not sure=
 if you checked, but I follow your advice already and I did only up to 2 re=
verts per article reverting that anon. Suricane "the ass wipe" has no groun=
ds, he is just trying to manipulate administrators right now. Hope this wil=
l end now but we should collect evidence on Suricane because he will do it =
again. I just know that.Thanks again for the support.
Jacek
--- On Thu, 9/3/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
Subject: Re: [WPM] Is Sciurin=E6 sanctioned?? Do we have anything on him??
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 12:14 PM

Jack wrote:
> Asshole is after me. He has no grounds but still block shopping.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thatcher#Edit_warring_by_Jacurek

That's why it's important to stay with 2 or 1 reverts per day on a given=20
article. And yes, we should collect diffs of when Scr is targeting=20
Polish editors, he does it relatively often.

Can somebody look into opening a dedicated wiki? I listed a potential=20
site we can do this on a few days ago.
http://www.yourwiki.net/wiki/YourWiki

Did anybody try it out? I am a bit busy now, so it may be a while before=20
I can do it myself.


--=20
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=20
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
=0A=0A=0A      
--0-804878483-1252012125=:82466
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;">Thanks Piotrus for the comments in my defence=
 on Tachers page, I'm not sure if you checked, but I follow your advice alr=
eady and I did only up to 2 reverts per article reverting that anon. Surica=
ne "the ass wipe" has no grounds, he is just trying to manipulate administr=
ators right now. Hope this will end now but we should collect evidence on S=
uricane because he will do it again. I just know that.<div>Thanks again for=
 the support.<br><div>Jacek</div><div><br>--- On <b>Thu, 9/3/09, Piotr Koni=
eczny <i>&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style=3D"bord=
er-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;">=
<br>From: Piotr Konieczny &lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;<br>Subject: Re: [WPM] Is S=
ciurin=E6 sanctioned?? Do we have anything on him??<br>To: "Wikipedia stati=
stics" &lt;folks@wikipedometer.net&gt;<br>Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009=
,
 12:14 PM<br><br><div class=3D"plainMail">Jack wrote:<br>&gt; Asshole is af=
ter me. He has no grounds but still block shopping.<br>&gt; <a href=3D"http=
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thatcher#Edit_warring_by_Jacurek" target=
=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thatcher#Edit_warring_by=
_Jacurek</a><br><br>That's why it's important to stay with 2 or 1 reverts p=
er day on a given <br>article. And yes, we should collect diffs of when Scr=
 is targeting <br>Polish editors, he does it relatively often.<br><br>Can s=
omebody look into opening a dedicated wiki? I listed a potential <br>site w=
e can do this on a few days ago.<br><a href=3D"http://www.yourwiki.net/wiki=
/YourWiki" target=3D"_blank">http://www.yourwiki.net/wiki/YourWiki</a><br><=
br>Did anybody try it out? I am a bit busy now, so it may be a while before=
 <br>I can do it myself.<br><br><br>-- <br>Piotr Konieczny<br><br>"The prob=
lem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
 <br>theory."<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Wik=
ipedia statistics discussion list<br><a ymailto=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedomet=
er.net" href=3D"/mc/compose?to=3Dfolks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedomet=
er.net</a><br><a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/=
folks" target=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/=
folks</a><br></div></blockquote></div></div></td></tr></table><br>=0A=0A=0A=
=0A      
--0-804878483-1252012125=:82466--


--===============0531177917629759398==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0531177917629759398==--


