X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jul 16 09:44:13 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A5E471F.1060906@post.pl>
References: <929ed1ec0907150915n76ff62fdt507474878b2d1b74@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0907151210m6bf429faxbc8724b07cc31225@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70907151238w5e91489ajb47b7406068262e3@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A5E471F.1060906@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:43:55 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0907160043x35d31f73x92611fef4b97c9b3@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Actually Piotrus, the accusations against Ziemkiewicz
	are pushed by Thorsten1 correct ? I believe this is because Ziemkiewcz
	is one of the main critics of Michnik, who Thorsten1 idolizes very much
	as representant of the anti-national left movement in Poland. So I am
	inclined to think that the whole drama serves just to push a negative
	picture of Ziemkiewicz due to his opposition to left movement, Remember
	that to Thorsten1 anybody not from the left and representing Polish
	tradition is antisemite, racist and so on. Perhaps add some sound
	criticism of Michnik made by Ziemkiewicz into the article and see the
	reaction. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Lithuania bans "public dissemination of information
	considered harmful to minors"
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Actually Piotrus, the accusations against Ziemkiewicz
	are pushed by Thorsten1 correct ? I believe this is because Ziemkiewcz
	is one of the main critics of Michnik, who Thorsten1 idolizes very much
	as representant of the anti-national left movement in Poland. So I am
	inclined to think that the whole drama serves just to push a negative
	picture of Ziemkiewicz due to his opposition to left movement, Remember
	that to Thorsten1 anybody not from the left and representing Polish
	tradition is antisemite, racist and so on. Perhaps add some sound
	criticism of Michnik made by Ziemkiewicz into the article and see the
	reaction. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Actually Piotrus, the accusations against Ziemkiewicz are pushed by
Thorsten1 correct ? I believe this is because Ziemkiewcz is one of the
main critics of Michnik, who Thorsten1 idolizes very much as
representant of the anti-national left movement in Poland. So I am
inclined to think that the whole drama serves just to push a negative
picture of Ziemkiewicz due to his opposition to left movement,
Remember that to Thorsten1 anybody not from the left and representing
Polish tradition is antisemite, racist and so on. Perhaps add some
sound criticism of Michnik made by Ziemkiewicz into the article and
see the reaction.

2009/7/15 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote:
>> Apparently, gays in Europe think that they need to run riot if a bill
>> bans material that "encourages gambling, encourages and suggests
>> participation in the games of chance and lotteries", "promotes bad
>> eating, sanitary and physical passivity habits", or gives credence to
>> paranormal phenomena and hypnosis.''
>
> It is such idiocy that ruins good causes - incidentally, I am pretty
> sure this is what Ziemkiewicz meant in the essay that has caused
> controversy in his bio (see Talk:Rafa=B3 A. Ziemkiewicz).
>
> Yet if you criticize extremist activists, you risk being labeled as
> enemy of all (add description of a group).
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

