X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jan 18 13:16:31 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0901180416o4c2e0dffn1a9bd87384cba608@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:16:17 +0200
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  A few days ago, I created <
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Soviet_repressive_organs>. Now, it
	has been CFD:d at <
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_January_15#Category:Soviet_repressive_organs
	>. There appears to be some merit in the CFD nomination, but I am not
	sure if it's compelling, or which way to proceed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] seeking counsel regarding [[Category:Soviet repressive
	organs]]
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7354341905233576441=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.7
X-Spam_score_int: 17
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  A few days ago, I created <
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Soviet_repressive_organs>. Now, it
	has been CFD:d at <
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_January_15#Category:Soviet_repressive_organs
	>. There appears to be some merit in the CFD nomination, but I am not
	sure if it's compelling, or which way to proceed. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4537]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7354341905233576441==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_8428_15515901.1232280977787"

------=_Part_8428_15515901.1232280977787
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

A few days ago, I created <
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Soviet_repressive_organs>.  Now, it
has been CFD:d at <
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_January_15#Category:Soviet_repressive_organs
>.
There appears to be some merit in the CFD nomination, but I am not sure if
it's compelling, or which way to proceed.

As a counter-argument to the nomination, for example, the militia structure
of Soviet Union would be law enforcement, but AFAIK, is not generally
considered a repressive organ by itself; on the other hand, intelligence,
counterintelligence and state security services were certainly repressive
but not law enforcement.

Which position should we take?  Is the category needed or not?

-- 
Andres Soolo

------=_Part_8428_15515901.1232280977787
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

A few days ago, I created &lt;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Soviet_repressive_organs">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Soviet_repressive_organs</a>&gt;. &nbsp;Now, it has been CFD:d at&nbsp;&lt;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_January_15#Category:Soviet_repressive_organs">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_January_15#Category:Soviet_repressive_organs</a>&gt;.<div>
<br></div><div>There appears to be some merit in the CFD nomination, but I am not sure if it&#39;s compelling, or which way to proceed.</div><div><br></div><div>As a counter-argument to the nomination, for example, the militia structure of Soviet Union would be law enforcement, but AFAIK, is not generally considered a repressive organ by itself; on the other hand, intelligence, counterintelligence and state security services were certainly repressive but not law enforcement.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Which position should we take? &nbsp;Is the category needed or not?</div><div><br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
</div>

------=_Part_8428_15515901.1232280977787--


--===============7354341905233576441==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7354341905233576441==--


