X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Sep 11 23:27:01 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0909111006kd8b4063l9ffd4031e936095c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0909111006kd8b4063l9ffd4031e936095c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:27:01 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880909111427i7495b8b3tfeff06e7c864e4fa@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Seems like most admins like KillerChihuahua and
	MBisanz
	have come to the rescue, I think the thread will die off now On Sat, Sep
	12, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > Check out
	Russavia's talkpage. Ezhiki has been repeatedly insinuating that >
	Sandstein is incapable of handling the situation, and is apparently
	trying > to collect a consensus of friends. > > When backing up
	Sandstein, the consensus on topic-banning Russavia on AN/I > is a good
	point of support. We should point out that Russavia's ban is not > some
	random thought of Sandstein. > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Sandstein may need support
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Seems like most admins like KillerChihuahua and MBisanz
	have come to the rescue, I think the thread will die off now On Sat, Sep
	12, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > Check out
	Russavia's talkpage. Ezhiki has been repeatedly insinuating that >
	Sandstein is incapable of handling the situation, and is apparently
	trying > to collect a consensus of friends. > > When backing up
	Sandstein, the consensus on topic-banning Russavia on AN/I > is a good
	point of support. We should point out that Russavia's ban is not > some
	random thought of Sandstein. > -- > Andres Soolo > > > Wikipedia
	statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Seems like most admins like  KillerChihuahua and  MBisanz have come to
the rescue, I think the thread will die off now

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check out Russavia's talkpage. =A0Ezhiki has been repeatedly insinuating =
that
> Sandstein is incapable of handling the situation, and is apparently trying
> to collect a consensus of friends.
>
> When backing up Sandstein, the consensus on topic-banning Russavia on AN/I
> is a good point of support. =A0We should point out that Russavia's ban is=
 not
> some random thought of Sandstein.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>



-- =

Regards,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

