X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Aug  1 01:33:01 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <BAY110-W4748876AC6A199772F21E1D6100@phx.gbl>
X-Originating-IP: [207.102.64.73]
From: Richard Tylman <poeticbent@hotmail.com>
To: <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:32:54 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <555223.41827.qm@web32801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <25890ca0907311551u59d32d03y4d1f951a56b70e02@mail.gmail.com>
	<555223.41827.qm@web32801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2009 23:32:55.0262 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[3ACEE7E0:01CA1237]
X-Spam_score: 2.1
X-Spam_score_int: 21
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Going back to users Faustian and Lvivske, I think it
	would be naïve to assume that one could make a couple of young hotheads
	like them slow down a bit by promising (in talk) to look into what they
	do in a neutral way. – If you dare to put a thinking cap on at the
	Massacres of Poles in Volhynia, please be warned. Your edits will be
	reverted, as explicitly stated in the intentions of the new article
	"owners" who do not understand that repetitive blanket reverts
	constitute an ultimate slap in the face of a fellow editor. I’m sure you
	know as well as I do that quickly reverting an elaborate edit is a form
	of personal attack – only nonverbal – similar to a middle finger. That’s
	because all automatic reverts are reserved for blatant vandalism like
	page blanking and swearwords. However, these two guys’ use blanket
	reverts mainly, because one of them freaks out at a sight of change and
	the other backs him up blindly. It does NOT matter how you phrase your
	rationale when making your own changes there, because you will be
	“talking to the hand” anyways. Faustian is not reasonable if you were to
	analyze his edits individually, one after another like I did. Anyhow,
	thank you guys for taking a stand in this matter. Your active
	participation means a great deal to me. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	2.3 FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD    Forged hotmail.com 'Received:' header found
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,HTML_40_50,
	HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] HELP!! Radek , Piotrus, Tymek and others.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8162312265139198570=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.2
X-Spam_score_int: 22
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Going back to users Faustian and Lvivske, I think it
	would be naïve to assume that one could make a couple of young hotheads
	like them slow down a bit by promising (in talk) to look into what they
	do in a neutral way. – If you dare to put a thinking cap on at the
	Massacres of Poles in Volhynia, please be warned. Your edits will be
	reverted, as explicitly stated in the intentions of the new article
	"owners" who do not understand that repetitive blanket reverts
	constitute an ultimate slap in the face of a fellow editor. I’m sure you
	know as well as I do that quickly reverting an elaborate edit is a form
	of personal attack – only nonverbal – similar to a middle finger. That’s
	because all automatic reverts are reserved for blatant vandalism like
	page blanking and swearwords. However, these two guys’ use blanket
	reverts mainly, because one of them freaks out at a sight of change and
	the other backs him up blindly. It does NOT matter how you phrase your
	rationale when making your own changes there, because you will be
	“talking to the hand” anyways. Faustian is not reasonable if you were to
	analyze his edits individually, one after another like I did. Anyhow,
	thank you guys for taking a stand in this matter. Your active
	participation means a great deal to me. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	2.3 FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD    Forged hotmail.com 'Received:' header found
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0018]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============8162312265139198570==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_bbb7b9e4-cb39-4fd0-93b8-480eca1b2842_"

--_bbb7b9e4-cb39-4fd0-93b8-480eca1b2842_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Going back to users Faustian and Lvivske=2C I think it would be na=EFve to =
assume that one could make a couple of young hotheads like them slow down a=
 bit by promising (in talk) to look into what they do in a neutral way. =96=
 If you dare to put a thinking cap on at the Massacres of Poles in Volhynia=
=2C please be warned. Your edits will be reverted=2C as explicitly stated i=
n the intentions of the new article "owners" who do not understand that rep=
etitive blanket reverts constitute an ultimate slap in the face of a fellow=
 editor. I=92m sure you know as well as I do that quickly reverting an elab=
orate edit is a form of personal attack =96 only nonverbal =96 similar to a=
 middle finger. That=92s because all automatic reverts are reserved for bla=
tant vandalism like page blanking and swearwords. However=2C these two guys=
=92 use blanket reverts mainly=2C because one of them freaks out at a sight=
 of change and the other backs him up blindly. It does NOT matter how you p=
hrase your rationale when making your own changes there=2C because you will=
 be =93talking to the hand=94 anyways. Faustian is not reasonable if you we=
re to analyze his edits individually=2C one after another like I did. Anyho=
w=2C thank you guys for taking a stand in this matter. Your active particip=
ation means a great deal to me.=20
=20
Richard  (Poeticbent) Tylman=20
=20
=20

=20


Date: Fri=2C 31 Jul 2009 16:19:59 -0700
From: basiaipiotr@yahoo.com
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
Subject: Re: [WPM] HELP!! Radek =2C Piotrus=2C Tymek and others.







=20
"UPA never engaged in genocide of Poles. It simply wanted them out of Ukrai=
nian territories"
=20
This is a very interesting observation. How about: "SS never engaged in gen=
ocide of Poles. It simply wanted them out of German territories".=20
=20
The more I read your posts=2C the more shocked I am. Looks like you know mo=
re than the general consensus of historians. Where do you get that info?
=20
BTW what do you understand by Ukrainian territories where Poles were unwant=
ed and simply removed?=20
=20
Tymek

_________________________________________________________________
Stay on top of things=2C check email from other accounts!
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=3D9671355=

--_bbb7b9e4-cb39-4fd0-93b8-480eca1b2842_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt=3B
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"mso-ansi-=
language: EN-US" lang=3DEN-US><FONT color=3D#000000><FONT size=3D2>Going ba=
ck to users Faustian and&nbsp=3BLvivske=2C I think it would be na=EFve to a=
ssume that one could make a couple of young hotheads like them slow down a =
bit by promising&nbsp=3B(in talk) to look into what they do in a neutral wa=
y. =96 If you dare to put a thinking cap on at the Massacres of Poles in Vo=
lhynia=2C please be warned. Your edits will be reverted=2C as explicitly st=
ated in the intentions of the new article "owners" who do not understand th=
at repetitive blanket reverts constitute an ultimate slap in the face of a =
fellow editor. I=92m sure you know as well as I do that quickly reverting a=
n elaborate edit is a form of personal attack =96 only nonverbal =96 simila=
r to a middle finger. That=92s because all automatic reverts are reserved f=
or blatant vandalism like page blanking and swearwords. However=2C these tw=
o guys=92 use blanket reverts mainly=2C because one of them freaks out at a=
 sight of change and the other backs him up blindly. It does NOT matter how=
 you phrase your rationale when making your own changes there=2C because yo=
u will be =93talking to the hand=94 anyways. Faustian is not reasonable if =
you were to analyze his edits individually=2C one after another like I did.=
 Anyhow=2C thank you guys for taking a stand in this matter. Your active pa=
rticipation means a great deal to me. <?xml:namespace prefix =3D o ns =3D "=
urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN>=
</P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"mso-ansi-=
language: EN-US" lang=3DEN-US><FONT color=3D#000000><FONT size=3D2>&nbsp=3B=
<o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"mso-ansi-=
language: EN-US" lang=3DEN-US><FONT color=3D#000000><FONT size=3D2>Richard<=
SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp=3B </SPAN>(Poeticbent) Tylman <o:p><=
/o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"mso-ansi-=
language: EN-US" lang=3DEN-US><FONT size=3D3><FONT color=3D#000000><FONT fa=
ce=3D"Times New Roman">&nbsp=3B<o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"mso-ansi-=
language: EN-US" lang=3DEN-US><FONT size=3D3><FONT color=3D#000000><FONT fa=
ce=3D"Times New Roman">&nbsp=3B<o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
<BR>&nbsp=3B<BR>
<HR id=3DstopSpelling>
Date: Fri=2C 31 Jul 2009 16:19:59 -0700<BR>From: basiaipiotr@yahoo.com<BR>T=
o: folks@wikipedometer.net<BR>Subject: Re: [WPM] HELP!! Radek =2C Piotrus=
=2C Tymek and others.<BR><BR>
<TABLE border=3D0 cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=3Dtop>
<DIV><BR>&nbsp=3B</DIV>
<DIV>"UPA never engaged in genocide of Poles. It simply wanted them&nbsp=3B=
out of Ukrainian territories"</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp=3B</DIV>
<DIV>This is a very interesting observation.&nbsp=3BHow about:&nbsp=3B"SS n=
ever engaged in genocide of Poles. It simply wanted them&nbsp=3Bout of Germ=
an territories". </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp=3B</DIV>
<DIV>The more I read your posts=2C the more shocked I am. Looks like you kn=
ow more than the general consensus of historians. Where do you get that inf=
o?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp=3B</DIV>
<DIV>BTW what do you understand by Ukrainian territories where Poles were u=
nwanted and simply removed? </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp=3B</DIV>
<DIV>Tymek</DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><br /><hr />Stay on top of th=
ings=2C check email from other accounts! <a href=3D'http://go.microsoft.com=
/?linkid=3D9671350' target=3D'_new'>Check it out.</a></body>
</html>=

--_bbb7b9e4-cb39-4fd0-93b8-480eca1b2842_--


--===============8162312265139198570==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============8162312265139198570==--


