X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Apr 30 01:34:13 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880904291625y34682ea8g6dcc7bf95a7e53e0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0904291428y30678c90mea7d88e6b68a8b24@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880904291625y34682ea8g6dcc7bf95a7e53e0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:34:09 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0904291634g78c78847hab4f8b35233d4b9c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:25, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > Patiently explain the need for reliable
	sources, then requirement for > due weight and the problems of OR and
	synthesis. Pin him down on the > need to provide sources to back his
	view. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Hiberniantears
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2812051506487200156=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.8
X-Spam_score_int: 18
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:25, Martin
	<martint20@gmail.com> wrote: > Patiently explain the need for reliable
	sources, then requirement for > due weight and the problems of OR and
	synthesis. Pin him down on the > need to provide sources to back his
	view. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4999]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2812051506487200156==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163662e5c629f6e30468ba04ad

--00163662e5c629f6e30468ba04ad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:25, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:

> Patiently explain the need for reliable sources, then requirement for
> due weight and the problems of OR and synthesis. Pin him down on the
> need to provide sources to back his view.


Has it ever worked before?  Can such cases be studied?

-- 
Andres Soolo

--00163662e5c629f6e30468ba04ad
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:25, Martin <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:martint20@gmail.com">martint20@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Patiently explain the need for reliable sources, then requirement for<br>
due weight and the problems of OR and synthesis. Pin him down on the<br>
need to provide sources to back his view.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>H=
as it ever worked before? =C2=A0Can such cases be studied?</div><div><br></=
div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--00163662e5c629f6e30468ba04ad--


--===============2812051506487200156==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2812051506487200156==--


