X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  8 21:47:30 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <73789.71843.qm@web32802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: m6LmpGgVM1nWzwd8UCwx4UKwIe6OwzxMJIf6VVdSeUcjVvvE.sv3Bx_0MLhnWFqJNFD766AF7hfFgMY0qZY4elbKSIwwjIbIV3mM6wgJGUAhJfbmPdbsxZLfkh0VUCQxlNQcYt5TKg3xEjYnK_7VRjdiACiwmNmAnkoOAx_ed.694NCTGKxxxR8mTSPEG94FHatgiVVG.cDZI2bJ7Ix6Eo9HsiH3vQ6noBh8CWDfwm9ioVEoIUPBJaBFncJX.pJ0GQmeV3FGyj2y4ZJ3NPaFsubRB8_.UhksJoq2sCd3unYMnkdvUqPD_soMq2yY_tY_dzrB6dDcRZMl2Yoh
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.4.12 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Piotrus, do you have any diffs to prove our point
	against Deacon? If you do, please share them here. Tymek --- On Mon,
	6/8/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: From: Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking
	on Deacon) To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net> Date:
	Monday, June 8, 2009, 2:44 PM [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, 
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking on Deacon)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2029666141871537699=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Piotrus, do you have any diffs to prove our point
	against Deacon? If you do, please share them here. Tymek --- On Mon,
	6/8/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: From: Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking
	on Deacon) To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net> Date:
	Monday, June 8, 2009, 2:44 PM [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org


--===============2029666141871537699==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1533258803-1244490440=:71843"


--0-1533258803-1244490440=:71843
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Piotrus, do you have any diffs to prove our point against Deacon? If you do=
, please share them here.=20
Tymek

--- On Mon, 6/8/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:


From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking on Deacon)
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009, 2:44 PM


Update: Deacon has reversed his actions. It remains to be seen if he can=20
convince some buddy of his to reapply them, which seems like the best=20
countertactic here. If this happens, let's remember that rollback is not=20
that important and Jacurek can ask for it in a short while, but unless=20
somebody can present evidence that he is creating battlegrounds, he=20
shouldn't be added to the Dig's list.

On the other hand, the thread is now in danger of being closed before=20
Deacon is punished. Comments that he abused the tools and acted in bad=20
faith towards Polish editors would be helpful; also consider sending=20
well-thought emails to AGK (but note he is not above revealing the fact=20
that he received emails on wiki).


--=20
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny=A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0|||____=A0 __ __
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=
=A0=A0I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."=A0 =A0=A0=A0|||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
=A0 -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
=0A=0A=0A      
--0-1533258803-1244490440=:71843
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;"><DIV>Piotrus, do you have any diffs to prove =
our point against Deacon? If you do, please share them here. </DIV>
<DIV>Tymek<BR><BR>--- On <B>Mon, 6/8/09, Piotr Konieczny <I>&lt;piokon@post=
.pl&gt;</I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(=
16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: Piotr Konieczny &lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;<BR>S=
ubject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking on Deacon)<BR>To: "Wi=
kipedia statistics" &lt;folks@wikipedometer.net&gt;<BR>Date: Monday, June 8=
, 2009, 2:44 PM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=3DplainMail>Update: Deacon has reversed his actions. It remains =
to be seen if he can <BR>convince some buddy of his to reapply them, which =
seems like the best <BR>countertactic here. If this happens, let's remember=
 that rollback is not <BR>that important and Jacurek can ask for it in a sh=
ort while, but unless <BR>somebody can present evidence that he is creating=
 battlegrounds, he <BR>shouldn't be added to the Dig's list.<BR><BR>On the =
other hand, the thread is now in danger of being closed before <BR>Deacon i=
s punished. Comments that he abused the tools and acted in bad <BR>faith to=
wards Polish editors would be helpful; also consider sending <BR>well-thoug=
ht emails to AGK (but note he is not above revealing the fact <BR>that he r=
eceived emails on wiki).<BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Koni=
eczny&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;|||____&nbsp; __ __<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &=
nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=
=3D__|_|I__I=3D&gt;<BR>"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."&nbsp; &nbsp;=
&nbsp;&nbsp;|||<BR>"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."<BR=
>&nbsp; -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"<BR><BR>_=
______________________________________________<BR>Wikipedia statistics disc=
ussion list<BR><A href=3D"http://us.mc328.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=3Dfo=
lks@wikipedometer.net" ymailto=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wik=
ipedometer.net</A><BR><A href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/l=
istinfo/folks" target=3D_blank>http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/lis=
tinfo/folks</A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table><br>=0A=0A      
--0-1533258803-1244490440=:71843--


--===============2029666141871537699==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2029666141871537699==--


