X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Aug 30 15:22:07 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A982AA4.6070605@post.pl>
References: <750762.25002.qm@web32807.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<4A982AA4.6070605@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:21:59 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0908300621q4dbe4821k18adfe0bcf3ad5b9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yes, I know there is an article,
	my version is the copy
	of this artricle with expanded information. It is not something
	completely new, but the same version as with wiki but biger, with more
	information, an sources. You can just paste it into the article with
	summary (expanded information). I tested it on preview and they were no
	errors, but you can double check to be sure. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Theodore Oberlander article complete
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yes, I know there is an article, my version is the copy
	of this artricle with expanded information. It is not something
	completely new, but the same version as with wiki but biger, with more
	information, an sources. You can just paste it into the article with
	summary (expanded information). I tested it on preview and they were no
	errors, but you can double check to be sure. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Yes, I know there is an article, my version is the copy of this
artricle with expanded information. It is not something completely
new, but the same version as with wiki but biger, with more
information, an sources. You can just paste it into the article with
summary (expanded information). I tested it on preview and they were
no errors, but you can double check to be sure.

2009/8/28 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> piotr micula wrote:
>> OK, but there is an article on him already
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Oberl%C3%A4nder .
>>
>> What am I supposed to do now? Replace it all with what you wrote?
>> Tymek
>
> Merge. Question to Molobo: is your article a merged version? If not,
> please rewrite it so.
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

