X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Sep  1 12:23:40 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0908300621q4dbe4821k18adfe0bcf3ad5b9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <750762.25002.qm@web32807.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<4A982AA4.6070605@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0908300621q4dbe4821k18adfe0bcf3ad5b9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:23:32 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0909010323p2d5ec5d6wa059c2bbc7d740c5@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: So is anybody going to copy this article or was my
	work
	pointless ? 2009/8/30 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>: > Yes, I know
	there is an article, my version is the copy of this > artricle with
	expanded information. It is not something completely > new, but the same
	version as with wiki but biger, with more > information, an sources. You
	can just paste it into the article with > summary (expanded
	information). I tested it on preview and they were > no errors, but you
	can double check to be sure. > > 2009/8/28 Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl>: >> piotr micula wrote: >>> OK, but there is an article
	on him already >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Oberl%C3%A4nder
	. >>> >>> What am I supposed to do now? Replace it all with what you
	wrote? >>> Tymek >> >> Merge. Question to Molobo: is your article a
	merged version? If not, >> please rewrite it so. >> >> -- >> Piotr
	Konieczny >> >> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in
	reality, not in >> theory." >> >> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion
	list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Theodore Oberlander article complete
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  So is anybody going to copy this article or was my work
	pointless ? 2009/8/30 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>: > Yes, I know
	there is an article, my version is the copy of this > artricle with
	expanded information. It is not something completely > new, but the same
	version as with wiki but biger, with more > information, an sources. You
	can just paste it into the article with > summary (expanded
	information). I tested it on preview and they were > no errors, but you
	can double check to be sure. > > 2009/8/28 Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl>: >> piotr micula wrote: >>> OK, but there is an article
	on him already >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Oberl%C3%A4nder
	. >>> >>> What am I supposed to do now? Replace it all with what you
	wrote? >>> Tymek >> >> Merge. Question to Molobo: is your article a
	merged version? If not, >> please rewrite it so. >> >> -- >> Piotr
	Konieczny >> >> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in
	reality, not in >> theory." >> >> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion
	list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

So is anybody going to copy this article or was my work pointless ?

2009/8/30 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>:
> Yes, I know there is an article, my version is the copy of this
> artricle with expanded information. It is not something completely
> new, but the same version as with wiki but biger, with more
> information, an sources. You can just paste it into the article with
> summary (expanded information). I tested it on preview and they were
> no errors, but you can double check to be sure.
>
> 2009/8/28 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
>> piotr micula wrote:
>>> OK, but there is an article on him already
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Oberl%C3%A4nder .
>>>
>>> What am I supposed to do now? Replace it all with what you wrote?
>>> Tymek
>>
>> Merge. Question to Molobo: is your article a merged version? If not,
>> please rewrite it so.
>>
>> --
>> Piotr Konieczny
>>
>> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
>> theory."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

