X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun 30 21:47:08 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0906301140m5e184e7eh9e9e549b506fc75c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0906300641x650da7e7nff045f4a10862e71@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906300725o64bf1aebp176b7447bf8fbd62@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906300800i73b500dcme382df96f2cbe5c7@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906301013i387b0cf6q83e687f702b4e2c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906301128kb8315f0pb526ab31f1aae6f1@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906301140m5e184e7eh9e9e549b506fc75c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:46:53 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906301246o58d6dd19pf7cab52b8bd26dff@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I'm not so sure that they're the same user - unless
	you
	know something I don't. While there's an obvious similarity in POV and
	topics they seem to have pretty different personalities (Skap being the
	passive aggressive type, while you can sort of tell HM has a bit of a
	temper). I've also seen some exchanges between them that appeared
	genuine. Of course all that could be faked (though personality is
	pretty
	hard) However, as I've mentioned before, there was some concern at some
	point about Herkus letting his "brother" use his computer - of course
	his "brother" made edits in support of HM. He was told to cut it out.
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] and Jacob Peters probably back too
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I'm not so sure that they're the same user - unless you
	know something I don't. While there's an obvious similarity in POV and
	topics they seem to have pretty different personalities (Skap being the
	passive aggressive type, while you can sort of tell HM has a bit of a
	temper). I've also seen some exchanges between them that appeared
	genuine. Of course all that could be faked (though personality is pretty
	hard) However, as I've mentioned before, there was some concern at some
	point about Herkus letting his "brother" use his computer - of course
	his "brother" made edits in support of HM. He was told to cut it out.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I'm not so sure that they're the same user - unless you know something
I don't. While there's an obvious similarity in POV and topics they
seem to have pretty different personalities (Skap being the passive
aggressive type, while you can sort of tell HM has a bit of a temper).
I've also seen some exchanges between them that appeared genuine. Of
course all that could be faked (though personality is pretty hard)
However, as I've mentioned before, there was some concern at some
point about Herkus letting his "brother" use his computer - of course
his "brother" made edits in support of HM. He was told to cut it out.

Radek


2009/6/30 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>:
> Never created a SPI before. Isn't it done automatically ? I can write
> content for SPI and point out to past joint actions of the two
> accounts, same phrases and same edit wars.
>
>
> 2009/6/30 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 20:13, Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am quite certain that IP check during Sockpuppet investigation would
>>> turn badly for both Skapperod and HerkusMonte.
>>
>> It's probably a good time for doing it, considering the development at A=
E.
>> =A0If we're lucky (well ...), the SPI will be over before the AE is even
>> picked up. =A0Can you construct a SPI request? =A0I'm sure somebody here=
 can
>> file it.
>> --
>> Andres Soolo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

