X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Sep  3 22:14:54 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4AA023BF.2040907@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:14:55 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.17
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <574245.36226.qm@web45107.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <574245.36226.qm@web45107.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
X-Spam_score: -1.6
X-Spam_score_int: -15
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Jack wrote: > Asshole is after me. He has no grounds
	but still block shopping. >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thatcher#Edit_warring_by_Jacurek
	That's why it's important to stay with 2 or 1 reverts per day on a
	given
	article. And yes, we should collect diffs of when Scr is targeting
	Polish editors, he does it relatively often. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-1.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	-0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM]
 =?iso-8859-1?q?Is_Sciurin=E6_sanctioned=3F=3F_Do_we_have_an?=
 =?iso-8859-1?q?ything_on_him=3F=3F?=
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -1.6
X-Spam_score_int: -15
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Jack wrote: > Asshole is after me. He has no grounds but
	still block shopping. >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thatcher#Edit_warring_by_Jacurek
	That's why it's important to stay with 2 or 1 reverts per day on a given
	article. And yes, we should collect diffs of when Scr is targeting
	Polish editors, he does it relatively often. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-1.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	-0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Jack wrote:
> Asshole is after me. He has no grounds but still block shopping.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thatcher#Edit_warring_by_Jacurek

That's why it's important to stay with 2 or 1 reverts per day on a given 
article. And yes, we should collect diffs of when Scr is targeting 
Polish editors, he does it relatively often.

Can somebody look into opening a dedicated wiki? I listed a potential 
site we can do this on a few days ago.
http://www.yourwiki.net/wiki/YourWiki

Did anybody try it out? I am a bit busy now, so it may be a while before 
I can do it myself.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

