X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun  1 08:33:44 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A237629.3030502@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 08:33:13 +0200
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <6c9a05ec0905231259r4ffb1fa7i350386b8cd565ea@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0905271342p2266776el5ab3e92702419fef@mail.gmail.com>	<4A1E2E3F.30306@post.pl>	<4f045a880905280014r457170ddu3799a8e8e7d9ceca@mail.gmail.com>	<4A22A7EC.3010107@post.pl>	<6c9a05ec0905310930p44d63c2h79337fc4b64eaead@mail.gmail.com>	<6c9a05ec0905311005n1fa330a3qbb58a99607fdc86c@mail.gmail.com>	<4A22F6A3.6090300@post.pl>	<929ed1ec0905311648p1901ee52mc5ebfecb258e68bc@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0905311851j11a82d11pa278dc4ed7b6443f@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0905312008m4cb43360q9d549cb2639607ae@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0905312008m4cb43360q9d549cb2639607ae@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: radek szulga wrote: > This is pretty insane. Now Avi's
	saying that he's blocking Molobo for > sock puppetry based solely on
	the
	publicly available evidence and > hence there is no need to release the
	secret evidence. > This despite the fact that we have at least three
	involved clerks > and/or admins - Mayalld, nix eagle and AdjustShift -
	stating > explicitly that the publicly available evidence was not
	sufficient. > Hell, I think even Skapperod - the guy who brought this up
	- said > somewhere that the publicly available evidence was not
	sufficient (I > can't find this after all the mess with moving comments
	but I remember > this). > This really really stinks. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon and Molobo
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > This is pretty insane. Now Avi's
	saying that he's blocking Molobo for > sock puppetry based solely on the
	publicly available evidence and > hence there is no need to release the
	secret evidence. > This despite the fact that we have at least three
	involved clerks > and/or admins - Mayalld, nix eagle and AdjustShift -
	stating > explicitly that the publicly available evidence was not
	sufficient. > Hell, I think even Skapperod - the guy who brought this up
	- said > somewhere that the publicly available evidence was not
	sufficient (I > can't find this after all the mess with moving comments
	but I remember > this). > This really really stinks. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

radek szulga wrote:
> This is pretty insane. Now Avi's saying that he's blocking Molobo for
> sock puppetry based solely on the publicly available evidence and
> hence there is no need to release the secret evidence.
> This despite the fact that we have at least three involved clerks
> and/or admins  - Mayalld, nix eagle and AdjustShift - stating
> explicitly that the publicly available evidence was not sufficient.
> Hell, I think even Skapperod - the guy who brought this up - said
> somewhere that the publicly available evidence was not sufficient (I
> can't find this after all the mess with moving comments but I remember
> this).
> This really really stinks.

This is what you get when your reputation is as bad as Molobo's. There 
are lessons to draw from this.

-- 
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

