X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Aug 14 00:37:55 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A8495FD.8080800@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:38:53 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <4f045a880908122142nc29c0e8rdab4757897a267bc@mail.gmail.com>	<4f045a880908122147s4da3e90fh763550ff75c7ece6@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0908130812k7c90d139qb9f56be7e96be0de@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0908130812k7c90d139qb9f56be7e96be0de@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Andrei Dombay wrote: > He frequently blocked users
	with
	whom he had content disputes; that was > previously brought to Arbcom by
	Giovanni33 and his friends, but did not > result in any sanctions (a
	failed Arbcom request or an RfC about > Connolley >
	<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip>).
	[...] Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] William M. Connolley RFAR
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Andrei Dombay wrote: > He frequently blocked users with
	whom he had content disputes; that was > previously brought to Arbcom by
	Giovanni33 and his friends, but did not > result in any sanctions (a
	failed Arbcom request or an RfC about > Connolley >
	<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip>).
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Andrei Dombay wrote:
> He frequently blocked users with whom he had content disputes; that was 
> previously brought to Arbcom by Giovanni33 and his friends, but did not 
> result in any sanctions (a failed Arbcom request or an RfC about 
> Connolley 
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Ikip>).

I have mixed fillings about William, who even blocked me in the past. 
Still, he does a lot of good jobs on 3RR and elsewhere. I think I'll 
stay out of this, and I'd suggest the same for you - if we cannot 
contribute to his case, and we don't feel a clear need to, appearance 
there may just make us enemies.

I'd make an exception for those of us who want to go for an adminship, 
commenting there in a neutral fashion - for visibility and experience - 
may be a good idea. Just make sure not to take sides so nobody thinks of 
you as the future enemy :)

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

