X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Sep  1 21:35:35 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0909011232h7e6fbdc1n2168c72286ef5e40@mail.gmail.com>
References: <77941.86266.qm@web45112.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<461804.22192.qm@web32801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<6c9a05ec0909011232h7e6fbdc1n2168c72286ef5e40@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:35:28 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0909011235n5fc1468exf6aa5bb28ebd0af8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Jacure, despite what Tymek claims,
	this is not something
	new, as I wrote two days ago: (2 dni temu) *Yes, I know there is an
	article, my version is the copy of this artricle with expanded
	information. It is not something completely new, but the same version as
	with wiki but biger, with more information, an sources. You can just
	paste it into the article with summary (expanded information). I tested
	it on preview and they were no errors, but you can double check to be
	sure.* [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Theodore Oberlander article complete
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2722104839405772240=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Jacure, despite what Tymek claims, this is not something
	new, as I wrote two days ago: (2 dni temu) *Yes, I know there is an
	article, my version is the copy of this artricle with expanded
	information. It is not something completely new, but the same version as
	with wiki but biger, with more information, an sources. You can just
	paste it into the article with summary (expanded information). I tested
	it on preview and they were no errors, but you can double check to be
	sure.* [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2722104839405772240==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd22f6cb17caf04728940ab

--000e0cd22f6cb17caf04728940ab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Jacure, despite what Tymek claims,  this is not something new, as I wrote
two days ago:


(2 dni temu)

*Yes, I know there is an article, my version is the copy of this
artricle with expanded information. It is not something completely
new, but the same version as with wiki but biger, with more
information, an sources. You can just paste it into the article with
summary (expanded information). I tested it on preview and they were
no errors, but you can double check to be sure.*


So final question-I posted this article six days ago, after spending
considering amount of time to collect resources and edit the article, hoping
that it could get posted. So can it finally get posted.


2009/9/1 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>:
> Tymek why do you state this after  I already explained to you that it
> is not replacement but expansion of the current article. If you don't
> want to post it for reasons unknown just say so, I will ask somebody
> else.
>
> 2009/9/1 piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>:
>> I thought the article on Oberlander did not exist on English Wikipedia.
Now
>> I see it there, and I do not think it is fair to completely replace
>> somebody's work. Some user took their time, and now we are to destroy
their
>> efforts. Changes are OK, but not replacing the whole article. This is
what I
>> am thinking.
>>
>> Tymek
>>
>> --- On Tue, 9/1/09, Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Jack <jacurek@yahoo.com>
>> Subject: Re: [WPM] Theodore Oberlander article complete
>> To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
>> Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 10:11 AM
>>
>> I can do it,
>> Do we all agree as far as the version?
>> What are Tymek's abjections? Sorry I don't follow your disagreements to
>> closely.
>> Jack
>>
>> --- On Tue, 9/1/09, Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [WPM] Theodore Oberlander article complete
>> To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
>> Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 2:23 AM
>>
>> So is anybody going to copy this article or was my work pointless ?
>>
>> 2009/8/30 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>:
>>> Yes, I know there is an article, my version is the copy of this
>>> artricle with expanded information. It is not something completely
>>> new, but the same version as with wiki but biger, with more
>>> information, an sources. You can just paste it into the article with
>>> summary (expanded information). I tested it on preview and they were
>>> no errors, but you can double check to be sure.
>>>
>>> 2009/8/28 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
>>>> piotr micula wrote:
>>>>> OK, but there is an article on him already
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Oberl%C3%A4nder .
>>>>>
>>>>> What am I supposed to do now? Replace it all with what you wrote?
>>>>> Tymek
>>>>
>>>> Merge. Question to Molobo: is your article a merged version? If not,
>>>> please rewrite it so.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Piotr Konieczny
>>>>
>>>> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
>>>> theory."
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>>>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>>>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>> start: 0000-00-00 end: 0000-00-00
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>

--000e0cd22f6cb17caf04728940ab
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jacure, despite what Tymek claims, =A0this is not something new, as I wrote=
 two days ago:<br><br> <br> (2 dni temu)<br>	<br><i>Yes, I know there is an=
 article, my version is the copy of this<br>artricle with expanded informat=
ion. It is not something completely<br>
new, but the same version as with wiki but biger, with more<br>information,=
 an sources. You can just paste it into the article with<br>summary (expand=
ed information). I tested it on preview and they were<br>no errors, but you=
 can double check to be sure.</i><br>
<br><br>So final question-I posted this article six days ago, after spendin=
g considering amount of time to collect resources and edit the article, hop=
ing that it could get posted. So can it finally get posted.<br><br><br>
2009/9/1 Molobo Molobo &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:molobus@gmail.com">molobus@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;:<br>&gt; Tymek why do you state this after =A0I already expl=
ained to you that it<br>&gt; is not replacement but expansion of the curren=
t article. If you don&#39;t<br>
&gt; want to post it for reasons unknown just say so, I will ask somebody<b=
r>&gt; else.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; 2009/9/1 piotr micula &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ba=
siaipiotr@yahoo.com">basiaipiotr@yahoo.com</a>&gt;:<br>&gt;&gt; I thought t=
he article on Oberlander did not exist on English Wikipedia. Now<br>
&gt;&gt; I see it there, and I do not think it is fair to completely replac=
e<br>&gt;&gt; somebody&#39;s work. Some user took their time, and now we ar=
e to destroy their<br>&gt;&gt; efforts. Changes are OK, but not replacing t=
he whole article. This is what I<br>
&gt;&gt; am thinking.<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; Tymek<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;=
 --- On Tue, 9/1/09, Jack &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jacurek@yahoo.com">jacurek@=
yahoo.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; From: Jack &lt;<a href=3D"=
mailto:jacurek@yahoo.com">jacurek@yahoo.com</a>&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Subject: Re: [WPM] Theodore Oberlander article complete<br>&gt;&gt=
; To: &quot;Wikipedia statistics&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedo=
meter.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a>&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; Date: Tuesday, Septe=
mber 1, 2009, 10:11 AM<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; I can do it,<br>&gt;&gt; Do we all agree as far as the=
 version?<br>&gt;&gt; What are Tymek&#39;s abjections? Sorry I don&#39;t fo=
llow your disagreements to<br>&gt;&gt; closely.<br>&gt;&gt; Jack<br>&gt;&gt=
;<br>
&gt;&gt; --- On Tue, 9/1/09, Molobo Molobo &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:molobus@gm=
ail.com">molobus@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; From: Mol=
obo Molobo &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:molobus@gmail.com">molobus@gmail.com</a>&g=
t;<br>
&gt;&gt; Subject: Re: [WPM] Theodore Oberlander article complete<br>&gt;&gt=
; To: &quot;Wikipedia statistics&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedo=
meter.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a>&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; Date: Tuesday, Septe=
mber 1, 2009, 2:23 AM<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; So is anybody going to copy this article or was my wor=
k pointless ?<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; 2009/8/30 Molobo Molobo &lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:molobus@gmail.com">molobus@gmail.com</a>&gt;:<br>&gt;&gt;&gt; Ye=
s, I know there is an article, my version is the copy of this<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; artricle with expanded information. It is not something comple=
tely<br>&gt;&gt;&gt; new, but the same version as with wiki but biger, with=
 more<br>&gt;&gt;&gt; information, an sources. You can just paste it into t=
he article with<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; summary (expanded information). I tested it on preview and the=
y were<br>&gt;&gt;&gt; no errors, but you can double check to be sure.<br>&=
gt;&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;&gt; 2009/8/28 Piotr Konieczny &lt;piokon@post.pl&gt=
;:<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; piotr micula wrote:<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; OK, but there =
is an article on him already<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"http://en.w=
ikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Oberl%C3%A4nder">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The=
odor_Oberl%C3%A4nder</a> .<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; What am I supposed to do now? =
Replace it all with what you wrote?<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Tymek<br>&gt;&g=
t;&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Merge. Question to Molobo: is your article a=
 merged version? If not,<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; please rewrite it so.<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&=
gt; --<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Piotr Konieczny<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;&=
gt;&gt; &quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality=
, not in<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; theory.&quot;<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; ____=
___________________________________________<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Wikipedia s=
tatistics discussion list<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikip=
edometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listin=
fo/folks">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>&g=
t;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; ____________________=
___________________________<br>
&gt;&gt; Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"mailto=
:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>&gt;&gt; <a href=
=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks">http://wikiped=
ometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; -----Inline Attachment Follows-----<br>&gt=
;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; _______________________________________________<br>&gt;&g=
t; Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:folks=
@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks=
">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>&gt;&gt;<b=
r>&gt;&gt; start: 0000-00-00 end: 0000-00-00<br>&gt;&gt; __________________=
_____________________________<br>
&gt;&gt; Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"mailto=
:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>&gt;&gt; <a href=
=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks">http://wikiped=
ometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;<br><br>

--000e0cd22f6cb17caf04728940ab--


--===============2722104839405772240==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2722104839405772240==--


