X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul 10 19:30:43 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0907100904x6ad1a4bai5f0228231ecafe1f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0907100904x6ad1a4bai5f0228231ecafe1f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:30:32 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907101030x5a08467cs61c6d5f6c8f00ad0@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  BTW on this the website says 6th/7th century which
	actually makes it roughly in line with Piskorski. I will change it
	accordingly. Radek 2009/7/10 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM]
	=?iso-8859-2?q?Sneaky_blanking_by_Skapperod_in_Ko=B3obrzeg_?=
	=?iso-8859-2?q?article?=
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6552287668786728128=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  BTW on this the website says 6th/7th century which
	actually makes it roughly in line with Piskorski. I will change it
	accordingly. Radek 2009/7/10 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com> [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	1.7 SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE  Subject: MIME encoded twice
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6552287668786728128==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d42bba4ea7b8046e5d5405

--0016e6d42bba4ea7b8046e5d5405
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

BTW on this the website says 6th/7th century which actually makes it roughl=
y
in line with Piskorski. I will change it accordingly.

Radek


2009/7/10 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>

> Skapperod deleted information about Slavic history of Ko=B3obrzeg coming
> rom the city authorities. He manipulated his explanation by stating
> "per RSN". However the link shows only one responce and seems to be
> attempt by Skapperod to bypass prior discussions in which Skapperod's
> attempts to cenzor Polish city authorities in history sections of
> Polish cities have been rejected.
> The blanking in question
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&diff=3Dprev&ol=
did=3D301331769
>
>
> Previous debates in which Skapperod was rejected:
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archi=
ve_24#Towns.27_websites_as_a_source_for_history
>
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources/archive_20#W=
ebsites_of_towns
>
> And here:
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archi=
ve_24#Towns.27_websites_acceptable_as_a_temporary_source_for_history
>
>
> Note that it has been determined that those sources are always
> reliable source in terms of showing what city authorities declare, and
> city authorities are of course notable sources of information about
> the city. No matter how Skapperod tries to delete them(as they show
> non-German history) he can always be countered using above argument.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--0016e6d42bba4ea7b8046e5d5405
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

BTW on this the website says 6th/7th century which actually makes it roughl=
y in line with Piskorski. I will change it accordingly.<br><br>Radek<br><br=
><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/10 Molobo Molobo <span dir=3D"ltr">&=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:molobus@gmail.com">molobus@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br=
>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, =
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Skapperod deleted=
 information about Slavic history of Ko=B3obrzeg coming<br>
rom the city authorities. He manipulated his explanation by stating<br>
&quot;per RSN&quot;. However the link shows only one responce and seems to =
be<br>
attempt by Skapperod to bypass prior discussions in which Skapperod&#39;s<b=
r>
attempts to cenzor Polish city authorities in history sections of<br>
Polish cities have been rejected.<br>
The blanking in question<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&amp;d=
iff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D301331769" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org=
/w/index.php?title=3DKo%C5%82obrzeg&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D301331769</=
a><br>
<br>
<br>
Previous debates in which Skapperod was rejected:<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticebo=
ard/Archive_24#Towns.27_websites_as_a_source_for_history" target=3D"_blank"=
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archiv=
e_24#Towns.27_websites_as_a_source_for_history</a><br>

<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources/arc=
hive_20#Websites_of_towns" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W=
ikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources/archive_20#Websites_of_towns</a><br>
<br>
And here:<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticebo=
ard/Archive_24#Towns.27_websites_acceptable_as_a_temporary_source_for_histo=
ry" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sourc=
es/Noticeboard/Archive_24#Towns.27_websites_acceptable_as_a_temporary_sourc=
e_for_history</a><br>

<br>
<br>
Note that it has been determined that those sources are always<br>
reliable source in terms of showing what city authorities declare, and<br>
city authorities are of course notable sources of information about<br>
the city. No matter how Skapperod tries to delete them(as they show<br>
non-German history) he can always be countered using above argument.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>

--0016e6d42bba4ea7b8046e5d5405--


--===============6552287668786728128==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6552287668786728128==--


