X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jul  2 19:34:03 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A4A8C99.1070502@post.pl>
References: <25890ca0906300904t384ebb5am2ede38d7e66a4ab9@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4A8A4C.4000804@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906301457r6d6f2da7pcc7af59df0cbed60@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A4A8C99.1070502@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:33:49 +0200
Message-ID: <6c9a05ec0907021033g1d95c228kb5607a8aae357b9f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Sorry guys I have been out of net for two days due to
	work. Radek be careful with Matthead-he is trying to bait you I think.
	As to Skapperod-it was a good chance to have him restricted to 1RR-it
	is
	still a good goal to achieve in future-and there is a lot of evidence
	to
	support this. Piotrus-sure I can find and restore Skapperod's RFC and
	add few other examples: See for example
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Royal_Castle,
	_Pozna%C5%84&action=history [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Skapperod is going after Loosmark at AE
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Sorry guys I have been out of net for two days due to
	work. Radek be careful with Matthead-he is trying to bait you I think.
	As to Skapperod-it was a good chance to have him restricted to 1RR-it is
	still a good goal to achieve in future-and there is a lot of evidence to
	support this. Piotrus-sure I can find and restore Skapperod's RFC and
	add few other examples: See for example
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Royal_Castle,_Pozna%C5%84&action=history
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Sorry guys I have been out of net for two days due to work. Radek be
careful with Matthead-he is trying to bait you I think. As to
Skapperod-it was a good chance to have him restricted to 1RR-it is
still a good goal to achieve in future-and there is a lot of evidence
to support this. Piotrus-sure I can find and restore Skapperod's RFC
and add few other examples:
See for example
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Royal_Castle,_Pozna%C5%84&action=history

In the course of month Skapperod engaged in dozens of reverts fighting
against Polish user to push a German name,

2009/7/1 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>:
> radek szulga wrote:
>> Sandstein is about to topic-ban or revert restrict Loosemark -
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=299586735
>>
>> I'm not sure if he can avoid this. But the key is to bring up Herkus
>> in as soon as possible to get him in any kind of ban as well. Mention
>> Skap's edit warring as well and hope for the best.
>
> Somebody with a little time should look at their recent diffs, as things
> are going on AE those days, just a brush ups with 3RR in the past month
> or two may be enough to give an editor a 1RR or a topic ban :( Idiocy,
> but if one side is throwing nukes, well...
>
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

