X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jul 16 01:13:25 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0907150612u5d7816f6pf70efae675f3b5f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0907150608s6949c524kc3ad5ec769b8030@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0907150612u5d7816f6pf70efae675f3b5f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:13:21 +0300
Message-ID: <f826636f0907151613q5d775240t6dc88f227e6111ba@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Any thoughts or suggestions?
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact&diff=302313517&oldid=301904438]
	2009/7/15 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>: > The concerned fragment Is
	> "The negotiations reached a sticking point on the question whether a >
	political turn towards Germany by the Baltic states would constitute >
	in Soviet view "indirect aggression" towards the Soviet Union,[42] >
	which Britain feared might justify the Soviets to intervene in Finland >
	and the Baltic states, or push those countries to seek closer >
	relations with Germany.[43][44]" > > Obviously this completely different
	from previous information that > Soviet Union demanded right to occupy
	Baltic States and tries to > portay Balts as guilty. > > 2009/7/15
	Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>: >> Did anybody spot the amount of
	white washing being done on MRP article >> in regards to SU ? >> >> A
	while ago I added some good sources explaining that SU conducted >>
	talks with Germany in secret, and also demanded right to occupyl >>
	Baltic states which Britain opposed. >> It seems they have been removed
	for some reason, You might restore >> some of that information, as
	currently the article claims SU only >> wanted to "intervene if Balts
	ally with Germany". >> You can find the info about occupation of Baltic
	states here(an old >> edit of mine) >>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact&diff=201870633&oldid=200813780
	>> > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net
	> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Molotov Ribbentrop Pact article/Baltic states occupation
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Any thoughts or suggestions?
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact&diff=302313517&oldid=301904438]
	2009/7/15 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>: > The concerned fragment Is
	> "The negotiations reached a sticking point on the question whether a >
	political turn towards Germany by the Baltic states would constitute >
	in Soviet view "indirect aggression" towards the Soviet Union,[42] >
	which Britain feared might justify the Soviets to intervene in Finland >
	and the Baltic states, or push those countries to seek closer >
	relations with Germany.[43][44]" > > Obviously this completely different
	from previous information that > Soviet Union demanded right to occupy
	Baltic States and tries to > portay Balts as guilty. > > 2009/7/15
	Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>: >> Did anybody spot the amount of
	white washing being done on MRP article >> in regards to SU ? >> >> A
	while ago I added some good sources explaining that SU conducted >>
	talks with Germany in secret, and also demanded right to occupyl >>
	Baltic states which Britain opposed. >> It seems they have been removed
	for some reason, You might restore >> some of that information, as
	currently the article claims SU only >> wanted to "intervene if Balts
	ally with Germany". >> You can find the info about occupation of Baltic
	states here(an old >> edit of mine) >>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact&diff=201870633&oldid=200813780
	>> > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net
	> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Any thoughts or suggestions?

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DMolotov=96Ribbentrop_Pact&diff=
=3D302313517&oldid=3D301904438]

2009/7/15 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>:
> The concerned fragment Is
> "The negotiations reached a sticking point on the question whether a
> political turn towards Germany by the Baltic states would constitute
> in Soviet view "indirect aggression" towards the Soviet Union,[42]
> which Britain feared might justify the Soviets to intervene in Finland
> and the Baltic states, or push those countries to seek closer
> relations with Germany.[43][44]"
>
> Obviously this completely different from previous information that
> Soviet Union demanded right to occupy Baltic States and tries to
> portay Balts as guilty.
>
> 2009/7/15 Molobo Molobo <molobus@gmail.com>:
>> Did anybody spot the amount of white washing being done on MRP article
>> in regards to SU ?
>>
>> A while ago I added some good sources explaining that SU conducted
>> talks with Germany in secret, and also demanded right to occupyl
>> Baltic states which Britain opposed.
>> It seems they have been removed for some reason, You might restore
>> some of that information, as currently the article claims SU only
>> wanted to "intervene =A0if Balts ally with Germany".
>> You can find the info about occupation of Baltic states here(an old
>> edit of mine)
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DMolotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_P=
act&diff=3D201870633&oldid=3D200813780
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

