X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jul 14 17:11:04 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c3b2b3db0907140744q1f74b14cv7b6b84b296b3f6e8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <bc2.4a4db562.378d5671@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907140744q1f74b14cv7b6b84b296b3f6e8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:10:51 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907140810l66813775v1c11eabab9dcb7e2@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Yeah I agree - and already tried to comment at the
	RfC.
	Mosedchurte has done some great work and he really knows his stuff (way
	more than I do at any rate). Siebert is another one of those editors
	that are civil, use talk a lot, use sources and completely POV articles
	- pretty much impossible to get rid off and basically just requires
	some really labor intensive countering. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] question
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7386140848263855804=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yeah I agree - and already tried to comment at the RfC.
	Mosedchurte has done some great work and he really knows his stuff (way
	more than I do at any rate). Siebert is another one of those editors
	that are civil, use talk a lot, use sources and completely POV articles
	- pretty much impossible to get rid off and basically just requires some
	really labor intensive countering. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7386140848263855804==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367ed5082463b1046eabd858

--0016367ed5082463b1046eabd858
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Yeah I agree - and already tried to comment at the RfC. Mosedchurte has done
some great work and he really knows his stuff (way more than I do at any
rate). Siebert is another one of those editors that are civil, use talk a
lot, use sources and completely POV articles - pretty much impossible to get
rid off and basically just requires some really labor intensive countering.

Radek


2009/7/14 Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>

> I had some email exchange with Mosedschurte. There is not much to tell,
> except he would appreciate some help with Viriditas; and he said he was
> followed by a number of "strange" editors who know very little but make his
> life difficult (that's true). I think we know too little to invite him here,
> but collaboration with him in WP would be beneficial.
>
> Paul Siebert is a Russian editor who persistently "NPOV" articles meaning
> the promotion the Soviet view of history.
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:33 PM, <PetersJV@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>  In a message dated 7/12/2009 2:48:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> piokon@post.pl writes:
>>
>> > What do you know about User:Mosedschurte?
>> > He just helped save two Nazi-Soviet images:
>>
>> He writes good (anti-Soviet?) content, didn't have much luck trying to
>> engage him in discussion. Overall, potential ally?
>>
>>  I only recently engaged with Mosedschurte, so far I can say all I've
>> seen is good work from our perspective and following sources well in
>> general. He's also had some disagreements with our friend Paul Siebert (on
>> which my tendency was to see things from the same perspective
>> as Mosedschurte). Sibert at least sticks to sources for the most part and
>> can usually be reasoned with.
>>
>> Viriditas (mentioned in another Email) has some serious ownership issues
>> compounded by a persecution complex compounded by egocentric (self as
>> target) conspiracy theories.
>>
>> /Peters
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Looking for love this summer? Find it now on AOL Personals<http://personals.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntuslove00000003>
>> .
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0016367ed5082463b1046eabd858
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yeah I agree - and already tried to comment at the RfC. Mosedchurte has don=
e some great work and he really knows his stuff (way more than I do at any =
rate). Siebert is another one of those editors that are civil, use talk a l=
ot, use sources and completely POV articles - pretty much impossible to get=
 rid off and basically just requires some really labor intensive countering=
.<br>
<br>Radek<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/14 Andrei Dombay <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wikibiophys@gmail.com">wikibiophys@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-=
left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left=
: 1ex;">
I had some email exchange with <font size=3D"2" color=3D"#000000" face=3D"A=
rial"><font style=3D"background-color: transparent;" size=3D"2" color=3D"#0=
00000" face=3D"Arial">Mosedschurte. There is not much to tell, except he wo=
uld appreciate some help with Viriditas; and he said he was followed by a n=
umber of &quot;strange&quot; editors who know very little but make his life=
 difficult (that&#39;s true). I think we know too little to invite him here=
, but collaboration with him in WP would be beneficial.<br>

<br>Paul Siebert is a Russian editor who persistently &quot;NPOV&quot; arti=
cles meaning the promotion the Soviet view of history.<br></font></font><br=
><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">On Mon, Jul 1=
3, 2009 at 11:33 PM,  <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:PetersJV@aol.=
com" target=3D"_blank">PetersJV@aol.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

</div></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px sol=
id rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div>=
<div></div><div class=3D"h5">



<div style=3D"font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;"><f=
ont size=3D"2" color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial"><div>
<div>
<div>In a message dated 7/12/2009 2:48:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,=20
piokon@post.pl writes:</div>
<blockquote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid blue; padding-left: 5px; margin=
-left: 5px;"><font style=3D"background-color: transparent;" size=3D"2" colo=
r=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial">&gt;=20
  What do you know about User:Mosedschurte?<br>&gt; He just helped save two=
=20
  Nazi-Soviet images:<br><br>He writes good (anti-Soviet?) content, didn&#3=
9;t have=20
  much luck trying to <br>engage him in discussion. Overall, potential=20
  ally?<br></font></blockquote></div>
<div></div>
</div><div>I only recently engaged with Mosedschurte, so far I can say all =
I&#39;ve seen=20
is good work from our perspective and following sources well in general. He=
&#39;s=20
also had some disagreements with our friend Paul Siebert (on which my tende=
ncy=20
was to see things from the same perspective as=A0Mosedschurte). Sibert at=
=20
least sticks to sources for the most part and can usually be reasoned=20
with.</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>Viriditas (mentioned in another Email) has some serious ownership issu=
es=20
compounded by a persecution complex compounded by egocentric (self as targe=
t)=20
conspiracy theories.</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>/Peters</div></font><div><br><font style=3D"color: black; font-family:=
 arial,san-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: no=
rmal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-st=
retch: normal;"> <hr style=3D"margin-top: 10px;">

Looking for love this summer? <a href=3D"http://personals.aol.com/?ncid=3De=
mlcntuslove00000003" target=3D"_blank">Find it now on AOL Personals</a>.</f=
ont></div></div>
<br></div></div><div class=3D"im">_________________________________________=
______<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net" target=3D"_blank">folks@wikipedo=
meter.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0016367ed5082463b1046eabd858--


--===============7386140848263855804==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7386140848263855804==--


