X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sat Sep 12 15:27:06 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0909120603n1e599bd7sfcda3ef359963f14@mail.gmail.com>
References: <929ed1ec0909111006kd8b4063l9ffd4031e936095c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f045a880909111427i7495b8b3tfeff06e7c864e4fa@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0909120603n1e599bd7sfcda3ef359963f14@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:26:56 -0400
Message-ID: <c3b2b3db0909120626o3dc19640n4806e4fc3059d390@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I made my comment. I do not think that blaming Ezhiki
	and Alex (who also communicated with Russavia) would be a good idea.
	Obviously, there is no consensus among administrators in favor of
	Russavia. On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
	wrote: [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Sandstein may need support
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4965205168412536871=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I made my comment. I do not think that blaming Ezhiki
	and Alex (who also communicated with Russavia) would be a good idea.
	Obviously, there is no consensus among administrators in favor of
	Russavia. On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
	wrote: [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4965205168412536871==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cffac02e2a404736163cc

--0015175cffac02e2a404736163cc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I made my comment. I do not think that blaming Ezhiki and Alex (who also
communicated with Russavia) would be a good idea. Obviously, there is no
consensus among administrators in favor of Russavia.

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 00:27, Martin <martint20@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Seems like most admins like  KillerChihuahua and  MBisanz have come to
>> the rescue, I think the thread will die off now
>>
>
> Alas, that does not appear to be the case.  Giano showed up and is
> attracting friends already.
>
> Somebody might want to explicitly call the ruckus wikidramu and/or complain
> about Russavia attacking an administrator because of doing his job.
>  Expressing disappointment over Ezhiki may also be a good idea.  Unlike Alex
> Bakharev, Ezhiki and Russavia made the mistake of conferencing on-Wikipedia,
> so there's space for finger-pointing.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

--0015175cffac02e2a404736163cc
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I made my comment. I do not think that blaming Ezhiki and Alex (who also co=
mmunicated with Russavia) would be a good idea. Obviously, there is no cons=
ensus among administrators in favor of Russavia.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Digwuren <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"=
mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204,=
 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 00:27,=
 Martin <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:martint20@gmail.com" target=
=3D"_blank">martint20@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin=
: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

Seems like most admins like =A0KillerChihuahua and =A0MBisanz have come to<=
br>
the rescue, I think the thread will die off now<br></blockquote><div><br></=
div></div><div>Alas, that does not appear to be the case. =A0Giano showed u=
p and is attracting friends already.</div><div><br></div><div>Somebody migh=
t want to explicitly call the ruckus wikidramu and/or complain about Russav=
ia attacking an administrator because of doing his job. =A0Expressing disap=
pointment over Ezhiki may also be a good idea. =A0Unlike Alex Bakharev, Ezh=
iki and Russavia made the mistake of conferencing on-Wikipedia, so there&#3=
9;s space for finger-pointing.</div>

<div><br></div></div><font color=3D"#888888">-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0015175cffac02e2a404736163cc--


--===============4965205168412536871==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4965205168412536871==--


