X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 19 20:07:25 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A3BD227.2080105@post.pl>
References: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906181304x6fab2980se600cc88f41aaaf8@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181350i5fbd4cc9u41114510a11eab2@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181358tec27236w5a3ad45a11e02432@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190014k624acd6as6a0793df5398e54d@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190412i80309d6kf23d7967fc7b8764@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906190619j14cfa570u7a77a29a69336ac4@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906190715w6e35fd30j508a40422aedcbef@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906191029t9a8ab49jc2c0922a0b24c1cd@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3BD227.2080105@post.pl>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:07:13 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906191107l1fff8199qa764014c613ca439@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 21:00, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Andrei Dombay wrote: > > I am afraid this
	will
	be seen as an intentional disruption, an action > > intended to
	"generate a lot of dramu", exactly as you tell. And it may > > be
	punished as [[WP:POINT]]. People are really getting tired of our > >
	dramas. Let's be quite. My filing was obviously a bad mistake. We > >
	should not make things worse ourselves. Our opponents will do it. >
	[...] Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0574140454124624164=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 21:00, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Andrei Dombay wrote: > > I am afraid this will
	be seen as an intentional disruption, an action > > intended to
	"generate a lot of dramu", exactly as you tell. And it may > > be
	punished as [[WP:POINT]]. People are really getting tired of our > >
	dramas. Let's be quite. My filing was obviously a bad mistake. We > >
	should not make things worse ourselves. Our opponents will do it. >
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============0574140454124624164==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7786cd14d3f046cb764b5

--001485f7786cd14d3f046cb764b5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 21:00, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> Andrei Dombay wrote:
> > I am afraid this will be seen as an intentional disruption, an action
> > intended to "generate a lot of dramu", exactly as you tell. And it may
> > be punished as [[WP:POINT]]. People are really getting tired of our
> > dramas. Let's be quite.  My filing was obviously a bad mistake. We
> > should not make things worse ourselves. Our opponents will do it.
>

Right, it was a silly idea.  Anyway, the issue is moot now, as all three AE
threads are now closed with no action.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001485f7786cd14d3f046cb764b5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 21:00, Piotr Konieczny <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">Andrei Dombay wrote:<br>
&gt; I am afraid this will be seen as an intentional disruption, an action<=
br>
&gt; intended to &quot;generate a lot of dramu&quot;, exactly as you tell. =
And it may<br>
&gt; be punished as [[WP:POINT]]. People are really getting tired of our<br=
>
&gt; dramas. Let&#39;s be quite. =C2=A0My filing was obviously a bad mistak=
e. We<br>
&gt; should not make things worse ourselves. Our opponents will do it.</div=
></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Right, it was a silly idea. =C2=A0Anyway,=
 the issue is moot now, as all three AE threads are now closed with no acti=
on.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001485f7786cd14d3f046cb764b5--


--===============0574140454124624164==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0574140454124624164==--


