X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul 10 17:31:28 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6fb557d70907100811n4e1f3a4duef5596a86f636fdf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0907071633x67d6dbf9g887c34fe4c6c4846@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0907091326m32644d3fv891a2626423342f1@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0907100757p743afb57n98630537a46fad47@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70907100811n4e1f3a4duef5596a86f636fdf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:31:16 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907100831q4592d915k1d8c65e98f1f8c83@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: That particular book is also available on Amazon with
	the "search inside" feature. I asked HM to remove his "verification
	failed" tag which he did, but of course also changed some wording in the
	process. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Can somebody correct HerkusMonte recent edit ?
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4329485078203216811=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  That particular book is also available on Amazon with
	the "search inside" feature. I asked HM to remove his "verification
	failed" tag which he did, but of course also changed some wording in the
	process. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4329485078203216811==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636a7d9c8c45bcb046e5ba955

--001636a7d9c8c45bcb046e5ba955
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

That particular book is also available on Amazon with the "search inside"
feature. I asked HM to remove his "verification failed" tag which he did,
but of course also changed some wording in the process.

Radek


2009/7/10 Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>

> Yes, i've read some books that have actually 85% of pages available
> though never while try to have ''a reading with one sitting''. Just
> clean the pages you've read from internet history and try again,
> you'll probably get some of those that you hadn't read yet.
>
> M.
>
> On 10/07/2009, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  Ask him for a screenshot.  It's theoretically possible that Google
> Books'
> > visible pages depend on what day it is or what language preferences you
> use.
> >  Amazon's approach manages to do that.
> >
> > --
> > Andres Soolo
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--001636a7d9c8c45bcb046e5ba955
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That particular book is also available on Amazon with the &quot;search insi=
de&quot; feature. I asked HM to remove his &quot;verification failed&quot; =
tag which he did, but of course also changed some wording in the process.<b=
r>
<br>Radek<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/10 Miacek and his cr=
ime-fighting dog <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:miacek08@googlemai=
l.com">miacek08@googlemail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt=
 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Yes, i&#39;ve read some books that have actually 85% of pages available<br>
though never while try to have &#39;&#39;a reading with one sitting&#39;&#3=
9;. Just<br>
clean the pages you&#39;ve read from internet history and try again,<br>
you&#39;ll probably get some of those that you hadn&#39;t read yet.<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
M.<br>
</font><div class=3D"im"><br>
On 10/07/2009, Digwuren &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:digwuren@gmail.com">digwuren@=
gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; =A0Ask him for a screenshot. =A0It&#39;s theoretically possible that G=
oogle Books&#39;<br>
&gt; visible pages depend on what day it is or what language preferences yo=
u use.<br>
&gt; =A0Amazon&#39;s approach manages to do that.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; --<br>
&gt; Andres Soolo<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">___________________________________=
____________<br>
Wikipedia statistics discussion list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--001636a7d9c8c45bcb046e5ba955--


--===============4329485078203216811==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4329485078203216811==--


