X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Sep  8 23:26:33 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c9a05ec0909081125h249d985te9bdd442d8da1666@mail.gmail.com>
References: <184746.12419.qm@web45113.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<4AA6A018.7070802@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0909081125h249d985te9bdd442d8da1666@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:26:28 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880909081426xe639357hdf8c27a2b9b294f2@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Xx236 just slapped a POV tag on [[Soviet invasion of
	Poland]], which I believe has FA status. On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:25 AM,
	Molobo Molobo<molobus@gmail.com> wrote: > However Piotrus, this means we
	do lose a contributor who was able to absorb > time and effort of
	unfriendly contributors, and who did patricipate in > votes.
	additionally Skapperod would gain credibility as "victim" and >
	productive member of Wiki community. I agree that Xx236 is completely >
	clueless as to avoiding personal attacks, but still I think a word or
	two of > warning to him to stop it might avoid a ban. If he
	continues-well it's sad, > but like Hanzo some people are unable to
	exploit Wiki doublespeak. > > 2009/9/8 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
	>> >> Jack wrote: >> > >> >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Xx236
	>> > What is our position as far as backing him up? He was reported bu
	S. who >> > in the past got in trouble himself for filing ungrounded
	complaints. >> >> Never liked him... >> >> >>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xx236#Notice_of_editing_restrictions
	>> >> Plus he so rarely edits articles, he is almost like a Polish Dr.
	Dan - >> all talk, little substance. That said, Dr. Dan is much more
	hate filled >> and so on... but to be honest, I don't feel the need to
	go out of my way >> to defend Xx, and a major factor is that I cannot
	recall a single >> helpful content creation he did (at best he makes
	some minor edits and >> complains a lot on talk). >> >> -- >> Piotr
	Konieczny >> >> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in
	reality, not in >> theory." >> >> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion
	list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Xx236 needs help.
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Xx236 just slapped a POV tag on [[Soviet invasion of
	Poland]], which I believe has FA status. On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:25 AM,
	Molobo Molobo<molobus@gmail.com> wrote: > However Piotrus, this means we
	do lose a contributor who was able to absorb > time and effort of
	unfriendly contributors, and who did patricipate in > votes.
	additionally Skapperod would gain credibility as "victim" and >
	productive member of Wiki community. I agree that Xx236 is completely >
	clueless as to avoiding personal attacks, but still I think a word or
	two of > warning to him to stop it might avoid a ban. If he
	continues-well it's sad, > but like Hanzo some people are unable to
	exploit Wiki doublespeak. > > 2009/9/8 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
	>> >> Jack wrote: >> > >> >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Xx236
	>> > What is our position as far as backing him up? He was reported bu
	S. who >> > in the past got in trouble himself for filing ungrounded
	complaints. >> >> Never liked him... >> >> >>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xx236#Notice_of_editing_restrictions
	>> >> Plus he so rarely edits articles, he is almost like a Polish Dr.
	Dan - >> all talk, little substance. That said, Dr. Dan is much more
	hate filled >> and so on... but to be honest, I don't feel the need to
	go out of my way >> to defend Xx, and a major factor is that I cannot
	recall a single >> helpful content creation he did (at best he makes
	some minor edits and >> complains a lot on talk). >> >> -- >> Piotr
	Konieczny >> >> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in
	reality, not in >> theory." >> >> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion
	list >> folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > > >
	Wikipedia statistics discussion list > folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Xx236 just slapped a POV tag on [[Soviet invasion of Poland]], which I
believe has FA status.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Molobo Molobo<molobus@gmail.com> wrote:
> However Piotrus, this means we do lose a contributor who was able to absorb
> time and effort of unfriendly contributors, and who did patricipate in
> votes. additionally Skapperod would gain credibility as "victim" and
> productive member of Wiki community. I agree that Xx236 is completely
> clueless as to avoiding personal attacks, but still I think a word or two of
> warning to him to stop it might avoid a ban. If he continues-well it's sad,
> but like Hanzo some people are unable to exploit Wiki doublespeak.
>
> 2009/9/8 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
>>
>> Jack wrote:
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Xx236
>> > What is our position as far as backing him up? He was reported bu S. who
>> > in the past got in trouble himself for filing ungrounded complaints.
>>
>> Never liked him...
>>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xx236#Notice_of_editing_restrictions
>>
>> Plus he so rarely edits articles, he is almost like a Polish Dr. Dan -
>> all talk, little substance. That said, Dr. Dan is much more hate filled
>> and so on... but to be honest, I don't feel the need to go out of my way
>> to defend Xx, and a major factor is that I cannot recall a single
>> helpful content creation he did (at best he makes some minor edits and
>> complains a lot on talk).
>>
>> --
>> Piotr Konieczny
>>
>> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
>> theory."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

