X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Sep  8 20:10:08 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4AA69E0C.4020702@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:10:20 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.17
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <bf7.6660deac.37d712ac@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <bf7.6660deac.37d712ac@aol.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: PetersJV@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 9/7/2009
	9:04:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > christiansuciu@yahoo.com writes: >
	> Not only is that a [[WP:OWN]] breach, it's also as clear a >
	[[WP:BATTLEGROUND]] violation as possible. Perhaps ANI rather than > AE
	would be a better venue for complaining, and perhaps a "this user > has
	exhausted the patience of the community" type of message might > earn
	him a lengthy block/ban. > > Based on this latest edit on talk... > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AThe_Soviet_Story&diff=312498936&oldid=312491468
	>
	<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AThe_Soviet_Story&diff=312498936&oldid=312491468>
	> > I believe we should lobby for a topic ban on anything involving the
	> Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. (If he wants to edit Heros of the >
	Soviet Union I don't care.) Please see my response to his in article >
	history. I also commented on his talk page. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb3
Subject: Re: [WPM] Russavia going nuts on Soviet Story
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  PetersJV@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 9/7/2009
	9:04:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > christiansuciu@yahoo.com writes: >
	> Not only is that a [[WP:OWN]] breach, it's also as clear a >
	[[WP:BATTLEGROUND]] violation as possible. Perhaps ANI rather than > AE
	would be a better venue for complaining, and perhaps a "this user > has
	exhausted the patience of the community" type of message might > earn
	him a lengthy block/ban. > > Based on this latest edit on talk... > >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AThe_Soviet_Story&diff=312498936&oldid=312491468
	>
	<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AThe_Soviet_Story&diff=312498936&oldid=312491468>
	> > I believe we should lobby for a topic ban on anything involving the
	> Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. (If he wants to edit Heros of the >
	Soviet Union I don't care.) Please see my response to his in article >
	history. I also commented on his talk page. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

PetersJV@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 9/7/2009 9:04:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
> christiansuciu@yahoo.com writes:
> 
>     Not only is that a [[WP:OWN]] breach, it's also as clear a
>     [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]] violation as possible. Perhaps ANI rather than
>     AE would be a better venue for complaining, and perhaps a "this user
>     has exhausted the patience of the community" type of message might
>     earn him a lengthy block/ban.
> 
> Based on this latest edit on talk...
>  
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AThe_Soviet_Story&diff=312498936&oldid=312491468 
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AThe_Soviet_Story&diff=312498936&oldid=312491468>
>  
> I believe we should lobby for a topic ban on anything involving the 
> Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. (If he wants to edit Heros of the 
> Soviet Union I don't care.) Please see my response to his in article 
> history. I also commented on his talk page.

And this is also why it IS important to make edits even if they are 
likely to be reverted by the CABAL. As long as we avoid editwarring, all 
of that is evidence of their POV/revert mentality/edit warring. So don't 
be discouraged by their reverts, and remember - we created this group to 
be able to act together, so if indeed they have taken over some 
articles, let's make the list and try to reclaim them.

Remember - they can be defeated, as was the case with the CABAL trying 
to push their POV on Poland subjects. They lost.


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

