X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Apr  7 07:01:32 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <49DADE35.5090707@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:01:41 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <49D6F9F8.3030603@post.pl> <49DA4A96.40806@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0904061136n4070fa1eg3a31d606a7bba79a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0904061136n4070fa1eg3a31d606a7bba79a@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.2
X-Spam_score_int: -21
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: More developments: I started a thread at AE against an
	irritating but not very active troll, Dr. Dan:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#Dr._Dan
	Deacon immediately appeared and started changing the focus: despite the
	new AE format requiring the discussion to be about Dr. Dan, he created a
	large thread about Polish editor Radeksz. I've now split this part of
	the discussion into a separate section, which I expect he will try to
	revert. If and when he does so, it would be bad style for me to revert
	but if other editors could come into the discussion, restore the heading
	(this is how it looks in the version with my subheading:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&oldid=282275111#Off-topic_discussion_concerning_Radeksz)
	and comment that the entire Radeksz discussion is off topic and
	irrelevant, this would be appreciated. Deacon in the past has gotten
	into revert wars about headings and such on AE / ANI and similar pages, 
	and another example of him warring on (disrupting...) such pages would
	be useful in the upcoming arbcom case. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon versus Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.2
X-Spam_score_int: -21
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  More developments: I started a thread at AE against an
	irritating but not very active troll, Dr. Dan:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#Dr._Dan
	Deacon immediately appeared and started changing the focus: despite the
	new AE format requiring the discussion to be about Dr. Dan, he created a
	large thread about Polish editor Radeksz. I've now split this part of
	the discussion into a separate section, which I expect he will try to
	revert. If and when he does so, it would be bad style for me to revert
	but if other editors could come into the discussion, restore the heading
	(this is how it looks in the version with my subheading:
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&oldid=282275111#Off-topic_discussion_concerning_Radeksz)
	and comment that the entire Radeksz discussion is off topic and
	irrelevant, this would be appreciated. Deacon in the past has gotten
	into revert wars about headings and such on AE / ANI and similar pages,
	and another example of him warring on (disrupting...) such pages would
	be useful in the upcoming arbcom case. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

More developments: I started a thread at AE against an irritating but 
not very active troll, Dr. Dan:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#Dr._Dan
Deacon immediately appeared and started changing the focus: despite the 
new AE format requiring the discussion to be about Dr. Dan, he created a 
large thread about Polish editor Radeksz. I've now split this part of 
the discussion into a separate section, which I expect he will try to 
revert. If and when he does so, it would be bad style for me to revert 
but if other editors could come into the discussion, restore the heading 
  (this is how it looks in the version with my subheading: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&oldid=282275111#Off-topic_discussion_concerning_Radeksz) 
and comment that the entire Radeksz discussion is off topic and 
irrelevant, this would be appreciated. Deacon in the past has gotten 
into revert wars about headings and such on AE / ANI and similar pages, 
and another example of him warring on (disrupting...) such pages would 
be useful in the upcoming arbcom case.

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

