X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Apr 23 03:19:27 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <191376.47171.qm@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: hF2KUpwVM1kezCT9xaQuafHG9E36FN_YIaKXpG05WeZF.K50UXQg9rKOIIuPOAdqIuRwAkKwan6KCwZIJOJpFUMZKgaXXLyDXBChjtxAe0BIbI8ZU3y6eIKlsfVv8DGihx6suzpU6HI_2peiw2QDrOP5GtWCeQl4YlLUpumtWqpB8Q50_K5znIQ2g1WpeFBwRz_QXPqOAK3B5FSn0Do_e8k8_tLPaSAQft6iuZYuuveCDdpWRsmc1UbRGJ6hlxR_XioHin..YYdQpKRbeeiLtGJoUQsT9X0f9GTqtQSESXSedNpMFA--
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.2.19 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>
To: folks@wikipedometer.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: If there's nothing or little more to a relationship
	than
	the fact that it exists, why not mention it at [[Diplomatic missions of
	Estonia]]? If there's no embassy, start a new paragraph, something like
	"Additionally, Estonia maintains relations with, but does not have
	embassies in, A, B, C..." Given widespread consensus that mere existence
	of relations is not notable enough for a separate article ("article"), 
	this seems like a good compromise solution. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: [WPM] Re
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0434857975916062379=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.1
X-Spam_score_int: 21
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  If there's nothing or little more to a relationship than
	the fact that it exists, why not mention it at [[Diplomatic missions of
	Estonia]]? If there's no embassy, start a new paragraph, something like
	"Additionally, Estonia maintains relations with, but does not have
	embassies in, A, B, C..." Given widespread consensus that mere existence
	of relations is not notable enough for a separate article ("article"),
	this seems like a good compromise solution. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4998]
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============0434857975916062379==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1643691970-1240449551=:47171"


--0-1643691970-1240449551=:47171
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

If there's nothing or little more to a relationship than the fact that it exists, why not mention it at [[Diplomatic missions of Estonia]]? If there's no embassy, start a new paragraph, something like "Additionally, Estonia maintains relations with, but does not have embassies in, A, B, C..."
Given widespread consensus that mere existence of relations is not notable enough for a separate article ("article"), this seems like a good compromise solution.


      
--0-1643691970-1240449551=:47171
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">If there's nothing or little more to a relationship than the fact that it exists, why not mention it at [[Diplomatic missions of Estonia]]? If there's no embassy, start a new paragraph, something like "Additionally, Estonia maintains relations with, but does not have embassies in, A, B, C..."<div><br></div><div>Given widespread consensus that mere existence of relations is not notable enough for a separate article ("article"), this seems like a good compromise solution.</div></td></tr></table><br>

      
--0-1643691970-1240449551=:47171--


--===============0434857975916062379==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============0434857975916062379==--


