X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Mar 26 15:50:52 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <652927.39645.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <652927.39645.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:50:41 +0200
Message-ID: <f826636f0903260750ydc5a887sa2d0b030e92bec43@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dorin Cheptea <dorin.cheptea@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Colchicum and Biophys - obviously yes, without
	reservations Ostap R - yes from what i know, but I had only several
	occasions to see his name Kober - rings positive, but i don't know him, 
	never interacted with, even remotely [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Interesting list
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6170886521453550857=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 2.2
X-Spam_score_int: 22
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Colchicum and Biophys - obviously yes, without
	reservations Ostap R - yes from what i know, but I had only several
	occasions to see his name Kober - rings positive, but i don't know him,
	never interacted with, even remotely [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.8 HTML_00_10             BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.5000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============6170886521453550857==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502c779800550046606bd6e

--00504502c779800550046606bd6e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Colchicum and Biophys - obviously yes, without reservations
Ostap R - yes from what i know, but I had only several occasions to see his
name
Kober - rings positive, but i don't know him, never interacted with, even
remotely

Narking - good person, and quite educated. but first try to approach him to
see if he would approve of the existence of our group. if he would approve,
then tell him of the existence and invite him. I have absolutely no idea
about his political views. can only tell that my interaction with him was
very positive, very pleasant person. But it was an apolitical interaction.

Eurocopter - I interacted with him offline. he is fine. He is a good editor.
But he would need some coaching. Sometimes he runs into problems other
people easily avoid. I mean in particular his interactions with Dahn and
Illythr - two people with different views from us, but with whom Christian
and I have very productive relations. Eurocopter sometimes goes into
arguments with them defending futile edits, instead of trying diplomatically
to reach some acceptable formulations. The point is Dahn and Illythr can be
accommodated if you press the right buttons. They are not your typical Irpen
with whom you (at least I) simply have (had) no leverage whatsoever. I am
saying this to support the idea that we should whenever possible avoid
uniting all these people into one category (against us), but rather exploit
the differences between them to our advantage.

the rest - I don't know them. So, for the record: "no opinion"

Dorin

--00504502c779800550046606bd6e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Colchicum and Biophys - obviously yes, without reservations<br>Ostap R - ye=
s from what i know, but I had only several occasions to see his name<br>Kob=
er - rings positive, but i don&#39;t know him, never interacted with, even =
remotely<br>
<br>Narking - good person, and quite educated. but first try to approach hi=
m to see if he would approve of the existence of our group. if he would app=
rove, then tell him of the existence and invite him. I have absolutely no i=
dea about his political views. can only tell that my interaction with him w=
as very positive, very pleasant person. But it was an apolitical interactio=
n. <br>
<br>Eurocopter - I interacted with him offline. he is fine. He is a good ed=
itor. But he would need some coaching. Sometimes he runs into problems othe=
r people easily avoid. I mean in particular his interactions with Dahn and =
Illythr - two people with different views from us, but with whom Christian =
and I have very productive relations. Eurocopter sometimes goes into argume=
nts with them defending futile edits, instead of trying diplomatically to r=
each some acceptable formulations. The point is Dahn and Illythr can be acc=
ommodated if you press the right buttons. They are not your typical Irpen w=
ith whom you (at least I) simply have (had) no leverage whatsoever. I am sa=
ying this to support the idea that we should whenever possible avoid unitin=
g all these people into one category (against us), but rather exploit the d=
ifferences between them to our advantage. <br>
<br>the rest - I don&#39;t know them. So, for the record: &quot;no opinion&=
quot;<br><br>Dorin<br>

--00504502c779800550046606bd6e--


--===============6170886521453550857==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============6170886521453550857==--


