X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Apr  8 04:04:51 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <49DC066D.9010409@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:05:33 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <49D6F9F8.3030603@post.pl>
	<49DA4A96.40806@post.pl>	<929ed1ec0904061136n4070fa1eg3a31d606a7bba79a@mail.gmail.com>	<49DADE35.5090707@post.pl>	<4f045a880904070030o4275f21g98ba9f0874534464@mail.gmail.com>	<49DB7D57.8020307@post.pl>	<4f045a880904071542w4f9aed3exedb4c146d3f8b0d2@mail.gmail.com>	<49DBD9B5.7080703@post.pl>
	<4f045a880904071720y6f8c3856i703e35ec4f877ef@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f045a880904071720y6f8c3856i703e35ec4f877ef@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.2
X-Spam_score_int: -21
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Martin wrote: > I didn't expect a block either. I've
	been thinking about adminship, > but the my block log will make it that
	little bit harder now, as my > opponents will no doubt exploit that
	point to undermine any requests. > > Can block logs be expunged, do
	admins have the tools to do this? I may > be able to convince the
	blocking admin to do this if it is possible > technically. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon versus Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.2
X-Spam_score_int: -21
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Martin wrote: > I didn't expect a block either. I've
	been thinking about adminship, > but the my block log will make it that
	little bit harder now, as my > opponents will no doubt exploit that
	point to undermine any requests. > > Can block logs be expunged, do
	admins have the tools to do this? I may > be able to convince the
	blocking admin to do this if it is possible > technically. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Martin wrote:

> I didn't expect a block either. I've been thinking about adminship,
> but the my block log will make it that little bit harder now, as my
> opponents will no doubt exploit that point to undermine any requests.
> 
> Can block logs be expunged, do admins have the tools to do this? I may
> be able to convince the blocking admin to do this if it is possible
> technically.

Unfortunately, no. The best recommendation is to wait a while - I hate 
to say it, but 2010 would be good - and stand for adminship there, and 
dismiss the block as "last year" and "lifted before it run out anyway".


-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

