X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jul 17 01:10:06 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A5FAADC.3060407@post.pl>
References: <25890ca0907140825s36d6f83cje812f6b689af8992@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0907150045m6e1d76a0o5c8848f7eedfd0e7@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907150139j4a6b276ap213e1fac6e2a967e@mail.gmail.com>
	<207274cd0907151310w1ae416can7120cc29f159be1@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907151319l6b03db97y913f4f56b9d339b4@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A5FAADC.3060407@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:09:42 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0907161609j3a53e503u35ed54b40b405030@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I think it'd be good if both Pawel and Lvivske just
	toned it down a bit. Quite a bit. Neither of them is helping the
	discussion. I might write an email to Loosemark telling him to chill
	out. It'd be good if Faustian also kept his cool - the way it seems to
	be working is that Pawel or Lvivske post something provocative,
	Loosemark or Faustian get baited by it and they start making "no
	compromise possible" type of statements and the situation escalates.
	I've been trying to interfere in the way that just cuts this kind of
	vicious cycle off but ... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Volhynia Massacres
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1048271701280369911=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.6
X-Spam_score_int: -5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I think it'd be good if both Pawel and Lvivske just
	toned it down a bit. Quite a bit. Neither of them is helping the
	discussion. I might write an email to Loosemark telling him to chill
	out. It'd be good if Faustian also kept his cool - the way it seems to
	be working is that Pawel or Lvivske post something provocative,
	Loosemark or Faustian get baited by it and they start making "no
	compromise possible" type of statements and the situation escalates.
	I've been trying to interfere in the way that just cuts this kind of
	vicious cycle off but ... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============1048271701280369911==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b4312d512ba4046edac4ca

--001636b4312d512ba4046edac4ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I think it'd be good if both Pawel and Lvivske just toned it down a bit.
Quite a bit. Neither of them is helping the discussion. I might write an
email to Loosemark telling him to chill out. It'd be good if Faustian also
kept his cool - the way it seems to be working is that Pawel or Lvivske post
something provocative, Loosemark or Faustian get baited by it and they start
making "no compromise possible" type of statements and the situation
escalates. I've been trying to interfere in the way that just cuts this kind
of vicious cycle off but ...

Radek


2009/7/16 Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>

> radek szulga wrote:
> > Oh, I agree that Pawel5586's a problem here too - I hadn't seen his
> > comments when I wrote the message and have been ignoring him since then.
> > Lvivske sounded ok in his response to me but he's leaving provocative
> > edit summaries and the like
>
> Let me know if he needs a warning or such, there is a chance he may
> listen to me due to (sigh) my nationality.
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

--001636b4312d512ba4046edac4ca
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think it&#39;d be good if both Pawel and Lvivske just toned it down a bit=
. Quite a bit. Neither of them is helping the discussion. I might write an =
email to Loosemark telling him to chill out. It&#39;d be good if Faustian a=
lso kept his cool - the way it seems to be working is that Pawel or Lvivske=
 post something provocative, Loosemark or Faustian get baited by it and the=
y start making &quot;no compromise possible&quot; type of statements and th=
e situation escalates. I&#39;ve been trying to interfere in the way that ju=
st cuts this kind of vicious cycle off but ...<br>
<br>Radek<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/16 Piotr Konieczny <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmai=
l_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0p=
t 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">radek szulga wrote:<br>
&gt; Oh, I agree that Pawel5586&#39;s a problem here too - I hadn&#39;t see=
n his<br>
&gt; comments when I wrote the message and have been ignoring him since the=
n.<br>
&gt; Lvivske sounded ok in his response to me but he&#39;s leaving provocat=
ive<br>
&gt; edit summaries and the like<br>
<br>
</div>Let me know if he needs a warning or such, there is a chance he may<b=
r>
listen to me due to (sigh) my nationality.<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>
--<br>
Piotr Konieczny<br>
<br>
&quot;The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in=
<br>
theory.&quot;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">Wikipedia statistics discussion lis=
t<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks" target=
=3D"_blank">http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--001636b4312d512ba4046edac4ca--


--===============1048271701280369911==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============1048271701280369911==--


