X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jul 14 21:59:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6fb557d70907141204r1b7d3849nd6d7e9bd5438434a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <bc2.4a4db562.378d5671@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0907140744q1f74b14cv7b6b84b296b3f6e8@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0907140810l66813775v1c11eabab9dcb7e2@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70907141204r1b7d3849nd6d7e9bd5438434a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:59:27 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0907141259q4556b7e2o2bd1fb18068e178f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 22:04, Miacek and his
	crime-fighting dog < miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote: > i agree that
	Siebert is a rather difficult case, exactly due to his > professional
	approach. He is constantly POV-pushing that e.g. MRP was > some
	inevitable step for ''buying time in order to build defences'' > etc. -
	a completely nonsensical POV, but alas supported by many > Western
	academics. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] question
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9051152246554809028=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 22:04, Miacek and his
	crime-fighting dog < miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote: > i agree that
	Siebert is a rather difficult case, exactly due to his > professional
	approach. He is constantly POV-pushing that e.g. MRP was > some
	inevitable step for ''buying time in order to build defences'' > etc. -
	a completely nonsensical POV, but alas supported by many > Western
	academics. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============9051152246554809028==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de00333ef280046eafe022

--0016e6de00333ef280046eafe022
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 22:04, Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <
miacek08@googlemail.com> wrote:

> i agree that Siebert is a rather difficult case, exactly due to his
> professional approach. He is constantly POV-pushing that e.g. MRP was
> some inevitable step for ''buying time in order to build defences''
> etc. - a completely nonsensical POV, but alas supported by many
> Western academics.


Supported?  Consistent, perhaps, but supported?

-- 
Andres Soolo

--0016e6de00333ef280046eafe022
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 22:04, Miacek and his cr=
ime-fighting dog <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:miacek08@googlemai=
l.com">miacek08@googlemail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
i agree that Siebert is a rather difficult case, exactly due to his<br>
professional approach. He is constantly POV-pushing that e.g. MRP was<br>
some inevitable step for &#39;&#39;buying time in order to build defences&#=
39;&#39;<br>
etc. - a completely nonsensical POV, but alas supported by many<br>
Western academics.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Supported? =C2=A0Consist=
ent, perhaps, but supported?</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<=
br>

--0016e6de00333ef280046eafe022--


--===============9051152246554809028==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============9051152246554809028==--


