X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jul 14 21:01:17 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0907140552t30225fe8i82c86c41ddd2e660@mail.gmail.com>
References: <25890ca0907140340u40447a53o429159d8f003d945@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0907140552t30225fe8i82c86c41ddd2e660@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:00:52 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70907141200k7ec623e0q131ea616e69da345@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I added the page to my watchlist. It was indeed a
	pretty
	nasty move by M.K. since the article had a number of acceptable
	references, esp. wrt Belarus. I'll revert, should he return there. M. On
	14/07/2009, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009
	at 13:40, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Isn't this just
	a sneaky way to "delete" and article one doesn't like w/o >> AfD? >>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Litvin&diff=next&oldid=301935330
	> > > Yes it is. In absence of Irpen, most third-party Wikipedians tend
	to frown > upon such an approach. If he repeats, this editwar is
	winnable, and even if > he doesn't, this incident should go to the Black
	Book. > > -- > Andres Soolo > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] MK
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I added the page to my watchlist. It was indeed a pretty
	nasty move by M.K. since the article had a number of acceptable
	references, esp. wrt Belarus. I'll revert, should he return there. M. On
	14/07/2009, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009
	at 13:40, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Isn't this just
	a sneaky way to "delete" and article one doesn't like w/o >> AfD? >>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Litvin&diff=next&oldid=301935330
	> > > Yes it is. In absence of Irpen, most third-party Wikipedians tend
	to frown > upon such an approach. If he repeats, this editwar is
	winnable, and even if > he doesn't, this incident should go to the Black
	Book. > > -- > Andres Soolo > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I added the page to my watchlist. It was indeed a pretty nasty move by
M.K. since the article had a number of acceptable references, esp. wrt
Belarus. I'll revert, should he return there.

M.

On 14/07/2009, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 13:40, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Isn't this just a sneaky way to "delete" and article one doesn't like w/o
>> AfD?
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Litvin&diff=next&oldid=301935330
>
>
> Yes it is.  In absence of Irpen, most third-party Wikipedians tend to frown
> upon such an approach.  If he repeats, this editwar is winnable, and even if
> he doesn't, this incident should go to the Black Book.
>
> --
> Andres Soolo
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

