X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun  3 20:50:01 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906030545n4ebf5b57m3ec56e1bb017d715@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A238480.5040704@post.pl>
	<c3b2b3db0906011524x15349ae0hfe6f40ecff5ddfbc@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906011555mf106db9rc3944fe7bd94d675@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A24C451.6010301@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906020151r2bc76954t97affdaa237a1d22@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70906020728g3afd6110l5f99cd93ddf01fff@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906020733q5e2c8b5cse87200771e07da23@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906030333q26f46d30yf9351f0e72b9165d@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A265B89.7090409@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906030545n4ebf5b57m3ec56e1bb017d715@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:49:48 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906031149j3f79c0f9j51634a631cf02f6e@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: He seems to have walked in from Military History
	Project
	quite by accident - maybe he saw all the dramu and got drawn in. So far
	he hasn't said anything nutjobby but his level of persistence is
	surprising for an uninvolved editor. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] [WMP] Molobo ban
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.5
X-Spam_score_int: -4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  He seems to have walked in from Military History Project
	quite by accident - maybe he saw all the dramu and got drawn in. So far
	he hasn't said anything nutjobby but his level of persistence is
	surprising for an uninvolved editor. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

He seems to have walked in from Military History Project quite by
accident - maybe he saw all the dramu and got drawn in. So far he
hasn't said anything nutjobby but his level of persistence is
surprising for an uninvolved editor.

2009/6/3 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 14:16, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>>
>> > Loosemark's actually doing quite a good job of keeping the heat on and
>> > asking some pertinent questions.
>>
>> Btw, who's Loosemark and what's his wikipolitic angle here? I don't
>> recall Loosemark editing any Polish-related subjects, so it is possible
>> he is simply grinding an axe against somebody, and by accident, is on
>> our side. What's his reputation? If he is a nutcase, his support and
>> alliance with him may not be in our own best interest...
>
> No idea on reputation, but his recent interests appear to converge around
> WWII, late Imperial Japanese military technology, and Poland. =A0Consider
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DBeata_K=B1dzio=B3ka&diff=3Dp=
rev&oldid=3D250679113>,
> for example -- it's a gnomish edit to a Polish article by Loosmark from l=
ast
> November. =A0Considering the difference in interest areas, probably Polish
> interested in some aspects of Japan rather than the other way around. =A0=
The
> fact that he's interested in Japanese involvement in its final (and
> ultimately, losing)=A0war rather than more popular, more glorious aspects=
 of
> Japanese history, is probably useful for further profiling.
> If I didn't know any better, I'd suspect Loosmark was Piotrus' sock. :o)
> I have not found obvious signs of nutjobbery. =A0For most of the part, he
> appears to have followed a relatively peaceful wikicareer as newbies usua=
lly
> go. =A0Probably worth defence, lest the Cabal figure out they still have =
the
> power to get rid of him.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

