X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  9 09:58:29 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A2E1608.2050405@post.pl>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:58:00 +0200
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <830063.89149.qm@web32802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	<929ed1ec0906081352i665fc1b2y2e9a3f889621cda5@mail.gmail.com>	<4A2D862A.2090206@post.pl>
	<f826636f0906081659t5f5043f7u738acfda49376df@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f826636f0906081659t5f5043f7u738acfda49376df@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  > I am sorry, I am afraid I don't follow you. Just to
	clarify, I don't > understand: > 1) what kind of accommodation between
	Hillock and Irpen? > 3) which nick have you mistaken: Hillock,
	Hillock65, Ostap, OstapR ? :) > answer only as many questions that
	straighten things out, not > necessarily all 3. :) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] More cabal theory
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  > I am sorry, I am afraid I don't follow you. Just to
	clarify, I don't > understand: > 1) what kind of accommodation between
	Hillock and Irpen? > 3) which nick have you mistaken: Hillock,
	Hillock65, Ostap, OstapR ? :) > answer only as many questions that
	straighten things out, not > necessarily all 3. :) [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


> I am sorry, I am afraid I don't follow you. Just to clarify, I don't 
> understand:
> 1) what kind of accommodation between Hillock and Irpen?
> 3) which nick have you mistaken: Hillock, Hillock65, Ostap, OstapR ? :)
> answer only as many questions that straighten things out, not 
> necessarily all 3. :)

I think I was mistaken to speak of accommodation, or at best, it was 
some agreement on some article, so it's unimportant.

 > 2) "sounding out" OstapR ? means you don't want him (ever/yet) [which is
 > absolutely ok if you have a good reason, even if you don't want to share
 > that reason with us] or means smth else?

I meant we should ask him to join the list :)

Shouldn't we have some policy on inactive members? With all respect, a 
person who never posts here is just a potential security leak...

-- 
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

