X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  9 11:11:43 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906090125j37476833g4dc26f2a8f7f2b9c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9a05ec0906060616s7dd20794o40b98d98be6687c8@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906072316l54bd7f3cr8db9d08928734a3a@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2CD905.8030904@post.pl> <4A2CE548.60607@post.pl>
	<6c9a05ec0906080626n2ba36a96id98c930a3d94221b@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906081106w5343e102rb5326d0a9965e5ba@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906081128i6518aa43nad634af788a23026@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906090048w579bf962k8743af75ef900ceb@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2E1714.4060603@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906090125j37476833g4dc26f2a8f7f2b9c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:11:28 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906090211r308d9833m22b93569f1ffc93@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:25, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > The admins are not stupid, and I'm sure
	they saw this growing and > getting messier and messier. They could've
	made a quick ruling to that [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Skapperod on the roll
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3559617320809207153=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.2
X-Spam_score_int: 12
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:25, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > The admins are not stupid, and I'm sure
	they saw this growing and > getting messier and messier. They could've
	made a quick ruling to that [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-1.1 BAYES_05               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5%
	[score: 0.0262]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============3559617320809207153==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6d53869fb60046be6beda

--001485f6d53869fb60046be6beda
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:25, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

> The admins are not stupid, and I'm sure they saw this growing and
> getting messier and messier. They could've made a quick ruling to that


Admins tend to abhor "drama".  Accordingly, very few show up when they see
anything that is more controversial than a single loner protesting.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001485f6d53869fb60046be6beda
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:25, radek szulga <span=
 dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rsszulga@gmail.com</=
a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0=
 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
The admins are not stupid, and I&#39;m sure they saw this growing and<br>
getting messier and messier. They could&#39;ve made a quick ruling to that<=
/blockquote><div><br></div><div>Admins tend to abhor &quot;drama&quot;. =C2=
=A0Accordingly, very few show up when they see anything that is more contro=
versial than a single loner protesting.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001485f6d53869fb60046be6beda--


--===============3559617320809207153==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============3559617320809207153==--


