X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Apr  3 01:14:47 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <49D53E8B.6090902@post.pl>
References: <929ed1ec0904021519y23c5e37bm2dd7bd3e71b2aea6@mail.gmail.com>
	<49D53E8B.6090902@post.pl>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:14:41 +1100
Message-ID: <4f045a880904021614y5e0f78bcn4ae396902de2e37d@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Digwuren wrote: >> Hi, >> >> William M.
	Connolly has blocked Martin for 24 hours, based on one of >> Offliner's
	reports :-( > > This only speaks of the need not to revert by yourself
	more then twice a > day and if reverts are needed, request them here or
	on IMs or such. > Revert warring by yourself leads only down this path.
	Learn from it. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] WMConnolly blocked Martin
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.4
X-Spam_score_int: 14
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Digwuren wrote: >> Hi, >> >> William M.
	Connolly has blocked Martin for 24 hours, based on one of >> Offliner's
	reports :-( > > This only speaks of the need not to revert by yourself
	more then twice a > day and if reverts are needed, request them here or
	on IMs or such. > Revert warring by yourself leads only down this path.
	Learn from it. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4798]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
> Digwuren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> William M. Connolly has blocked Martin for 24 hours, based on one of
>> Offliner's reports :-(
>
> This only speaks of the need not to revert by yourself more then twice a
> day and if reverts are needed, request them here or on IMs or such.
> Revert warring by yourself leads only down this path. Learn from it.

Piotr is right. We should be careful not to get into edit wars, I know
I have as my formerly clean block log testified.

Martin
Mental note: don't work so hard defending Piotr next time he gets
hauled before Arbcom ;o)

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

