X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 22:37:12 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906211336h47a4185eg660716b7591628f3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c39.57b57f3e.376ee266@aol.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906202028s9291ce7webaed4493229aedb@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70906210719u3ac8b9b3l9f28443cce3dabe2@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3E7FEE.8070601@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211212p10320e3cwbfc9bb3780e2a5c3@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211336h47a4185eg660716b7591628f3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:37:05 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211337h4be4fa8cm590a56d88be3e8ec@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: It might also be a good idea to challenge this whole
	notion of uninvolved/involved - who gets to decide? The cost of course
	is that it amps up the dramu. Radek 2009/6/21 radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com>: > Given the latest moving around of Piotrus'
	edits >
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=297786750&oldid=297786362
	> and Jehochman's statement that "Digwuren is one of the most warned >
	and sanctioned editors on Wikipedia. They do not need any more chances
	>
	to reform. " (which is obviously false - and it betrays his prejudices
	> here) I think it's probably time to start questioning his >
	"uninvolvedness" as well. > > It'd be useful to back track it to where
	it originated from which I > think someone already mentioned. > > Radek
	> > > 2009/6/21 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>: >> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009
	at 21:46, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: >>> >>> If Deacon
	chimes in with his "Piotrus is allied to Baltics due to >>> Irpen-hate",
	one can simply point out that he is assuming bad faith here >>> and
	that
	he is certainly involved and biased when it comes to anything >>>
	Piotrus-related :) >> >> And that there is no Irpen. >> -- >> Andres
	Soolo >> >> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion list >>
	folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> >> > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Well, there goes another weekend, the latest AE
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  It might also be a good idea to challenge this whole
	notion of uninvolved/involved - who gets to decide? The cost of course
	is that it amps up the dramu. Radek 2009/6/21 radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com>: > Given the latest moving around of Piotrus' edits
	>
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=297786750&oldid=297786362
	> and Jehochman's statement that "Digwuren is one of the most warned >
	and sanctioned editors on Wikipedia. They do not need any more chances >
	to reform. " (which is obviously false - and it betrays his prejudices >
	here) I think it's probably time to start questioning his >
	"uninvolvedness" as well. > > It'd be useful to back track it to where
	it originated from which I > think someone already mentioned. > > Radek
	> > > 2009/6/21 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>: >> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009
	at 21:46, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: >>> >>> If Deacon
	chimes in with his "Piotrus is allied to Baltics due to >>> Irpen-hate",
	one can simply point out that he is assuming bad faith here >>> and that
	he is certainly involved and biased when it comes to anything >>>
	Piotrus-related :) >> >> And that there is no Irpen. >> -- >> Andres
	Soolo >> >> >> Wikipedia statistics discussion list >>
	folks@wikipedometer.net >>
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks >> >> > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

It might also be a good idea to challenge this whole notion of
uninvolved/involved - who gets to decide? The cost of course is that
it amps up the dramu.

Radek


2009/6/21 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>:
> Given the latest moving around of Piotrus' edits
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Request=
s/Enforcement&curid=3D12936136&diff=3D297786750&oldid=3D297786362
> =A0and Jehochman's statement that "Digwuren is one of the most warned
> and sanctioned editors on Wikipedia. They do not need any more chances
> to reform. " (which is obviously false - and it betrays his prejudices
> here) I think it's probably time to start questioning his
> "uninvolvedness" as well.
>
> It'd be useful to back track it to where it originated from which I
> think someone already mentioned.
>
> Radek
>
>
> 2009/6/21 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 21:46, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>> If Deacon chimes in with his "Piotrus is allied to Baltics due to
>>> Irpen-hate", one can simply point out that he is assuming bad faith here
>>> and that he is certainly involved and biased when it comes to anything
>>> Piotrus-related :)
>>
>> And that there is no Irpen.
>> --
>> Andres Soolo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

