X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Tue Jun  9 05:53:34 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <5805.28757.qm@web32807.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: LBTxWDQVM1lmuyZtBqa1yQmTab47NLsEF2kgz0LmZw8XxfeUYnHt8SCH2ZHyyRugSZaUNy9.PUV5WoFaqjDav0ysLBXvUhJhmABJ7odX0rfGfXuCKDufKDRZ4lSSjXd6R6DYuxOF6yFgtW6lp7ifCES.kTj8rjN3NNWBZAvfgDAh8OO1dOIdcZQpFxzmVf_dpmPynfOQeB78UCdQlutBmST12qcZ6TO1cjkPq3Dm8zjVCDZ1Iq3SuGTb1mRRW8rFVzmjZ9aRIT6C.U3DYy57O3n91ebBauzCYuTXkcl.f3Vg3hFO185XD9D2SAcnYfK9Vr0ZVQuvRq6kR6M-
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.4.12 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 20:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: piotr micula <basiaipiotr@yahoo.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  OK, fine. Now let me know about some possibility of
	using this list in the future. I will gladly copy and paste it wherever
	it is useful, unless you want to do it of course. Tymek --- On Mon,
	6/8/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, 
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking on Deacon)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4321423156094730512=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  OK, fine. Now let me know about some possibility of
	using this list in the future. I will gladly copy and paste it wherever
	it is useful, unless you want to do it of course. Tymek --- On Mon,
	6/8/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote: [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	1.1 MIME_HTML_MOSTLY       BODY: Multipart message mostly text/html MIME
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


--===============4321423156094730512==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-836276609-1244519594=:28757"


--0-836276609-1244519594=:28757
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

OK, fine. Now let me know about some possibility of using this list in the =
future. I will gladly copy and paste it wherever it is useful, unless you w=
ant to do it of course.=20
Tymek

--- On Mon, 6/8/09, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:


From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
Subject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking on Deacon)
To: "Wikipedia statistics" <folks@wikipedometer.net>
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009, 4:42 PM


piotr micula wrote:
> Piotrus, do you have any diffs to prove our point against Deacon? If you=
=20
> do, please share them here.

This is my up-to-date evidence list against Deacon:

* stalking by D

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Eastern_European_disputes/Evidence#Tag_t=
eam_1:_Russian

* February 4 and 5, 2009 at AE:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D268589325],=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D268735675]=20

*February 25, 2009 at article discussion:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk%3AHolocaust_in_Lithuania&=
diff=3D273253643&oldid=3D273250888]

*February:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Requests_for_arbitra=
tion&oldid=3D270472942#Request_for_clarification:_Wikipedia:Requests_for_ar=
bitration.2FEastern_European_disputes]
an ArbCom clarification request, in which Deacon tries to portray may=20
normal administrative actions as some sort of wrongdoing, again. To=20
quote from Coren: "what I see is a 3RR report that was closed=20
uncontroversially and properly (and which nobody contests on its face,=20
for that matter), and a thread on AE that attempts to rely on a tenuous=20
possible conflict of interest to invoke sanctions according to a=20
particularily imaginative reading of a remedy which was swiftly (and=20
correctly) closed as unactionable. It is impossible, in this context, to=20
see this request as little more than forum shopping; and an attempt to=20
misuse the committee into a bludgeon in a vendetta." But Deacon didn't=20
even get a warning.

*April 3 and 4, 2009 at article and policy space:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DBattle_of_Vilnius_%281655%29&d=
iff=3D281534126&oldid=3D281530841=20
move], and when at talk=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Battle_of_Vilnius_(1655)&=
diff=3D281724660&oldid=3D281724299=20
I cite a naming policy in support of a version],=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3ANaming_conventions=
_%28geographic_names%29&diff=3D281729338&oldid=3D281533853=20
he changes the estabilished policy]! (he does so again on=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Naming_conventions_(=
geographic_names)&diff=3D282447250&oldid=3D282446029=20
April 7] and=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3ANaming_conventions=
_%28geographic_names%29&diff=3D282811646&oldid=3D282716398=20
on April 9], then responds with=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Battle_of_Vilnius_(1655)&=
diff=3D281729768&oldid=3D281729093=20
personal remarks on talk] (also=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Battle_of_Vilnius_(1655)&=
diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D281848806=20
here]) and misrepresents the case at=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D281718073=20
WP:ANI] criticizing Polish editors, then launches a clear personal=20
attack:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D281909360=20
"Piotrus, partizan campaigning with personal attacks and straw men on=20
AN/I is not likely to produce any results for you"], and another one:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D281996850=20
"I honestly can't see any useful purpose to your participation in this=20
thread except as partizan campaigning; unless that is stacking up Polish=20
votes to to Polonise the name of the Lithuanian capital has nothing to=20
do with nationalism."]

Please note that Deacon refuses to answer how he became aware of my edit=20
to this orphaned article=20
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzi=
m&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D282009689]).

*previous attempts at dispute resolution:=20
[[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Bad_faith_towards_me\Wikiquette alerts]]=20
(April 5): I've asked Deacon to apologize for his uncivil remarks=20
towards me; he instead=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&=
diff=3D282002372&oldid=3D281998868=20
repeats them and adds new ones]: "You then joined in with straw men and=20
personal attacks... I've been very moderate about using the "N word" in=20
the context of Piotrus' campaign to change the name of a Lithuanian city=20
to a Polish spelling... Piotrus, please stop with the frivolous=20
forum-shopping and please let a "debate" remain a debate without trying=20
to escalate it into a dispute". He also accused me of "disrupting ANI",=20
=A0 making=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&=
diff=3D282006059&oldid=3D282005792=20
personal attacks] towards him (I dearly invite anybody to read the post=20
in his diff and try to find any personal attack there) and of=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D282006979=20
nationalist POV]=20
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_n=
oticeboard/Incidents&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D282007762=20
also here]). His final comment at wikiquette indicated no good will=20
towards dispute resolution:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&di=
ff=3Dprev&oldid=3D282007379=20
"The phoney indignation is boring, and nothing's gonna happen here.=20
Please just stop all this drama-mongering"]. --~~~~

*April 6: as he has done in the past, Deacon appears immediately in a=20
thread I opened at AE, even through it doesn't concern him at all, to=20
defend an editor I complained about:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_=
noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282216930&oldid=3D282211595]=
=20
; he there accuses me of "forum-shopping", and categorizes those who=20
disagree with the editor I disagree with as "tendentious multi-blocked=20
nationalists trolls". Next, he makes an unbacked personal attack at=20
another Polish user, Radeksz ("he (Dr. Dan) is not by any means half as=20
problematic a user as, for instance, User:Radeksz whom Piotrus has gone=20
to a lot of trouble to protect"). He then hijacks the AE request by=20
posting obsolete (last arbcom) evidence against Radeksz:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282236979&oldid=3D282232264].=20
=A0=A0=A0Note that he uses evidence and claims from the rejected arbitratio=
n=20
clarification request to smear my and Radeksz name.
Third 3RR violation: Piotrus closes the issue himself to avoid a block"=20
and so on. Note also that=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282237414&oldid=3D282237165=20
he moves Radeksz post] like he did with mine earlier, with potentially=20
confusing results. When I attempted to structure the discussion, he=20
reverted me with an uncivil edit summary=20
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27=
_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282275525&oldid=3D282275111])=
.=20
Subsequently, a neutral admin reviewing this case=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3ADeacon_of_Pndapetz=
im&diff=3D282278967&oldid=3D282277765=20
supported my edit], as=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282288194&oldid=3D282287798=20
did another].

*April 7:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_talk:Requested_moves=
&diff=3D282445068&oldid=3D282443991=20
Deacon presents an analysis of vote], dividing users into ethnic camps,=20
with bad faith assumptions "long term ally of certain users", "(followed=20
user X and opposed him". Notably, the bad faith assumptions are limited=20
to the users opposing him; and the ethnic analysis is twisted - in an=20
attempt to show how Poles outvote Lithuanians, Lithuanian users agreeing=20
with Deacon and living in US are shown as Americans=20
([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_talk%3ARequested_mo=
ves&diff=3D282579954&oldid=3D282504996]),=20
but Poles living in US are, well, Poles...

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27=
_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282467288&oldid=3D282463214=
=20
more bad faith and slander]: "the four users are all your normal=20
tag-team partners I'd expect to turn up here....", "It's no secret that=20
I am one of many many users who have had a problem with much of your=20
behaviour Piotrus," "The long old ad hominems you've been in the habit=20
of launching against me and any one else whenever they try to ensure a=20
fair hearing for one of your ideological "opponents" won't make your=20
"evidence" against this one any stronger"

*stalking:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_talk%3ARequested_mov=
es&diff=3D282436896&oldid=3D282435103=20
Deacon appears on a Wikipedia page and answers my question, defending a=20
disruptive user]

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27=
_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=3D282618987&oldid=3D282609281]:=
=20
Deacon misrepresents the arbcom case, accuses me of "edit-warring in=20
with poorly-sourced nationalistic nonsense against consensus," (and also=20
slanders other editors: "no-one's gonna care, as most of the AE admins=20
have done much worse"). He repeats claims from last ArbCom that were=20
dismissed by arbcom (but were not clearly rejected, so as I predicted,=20
all the accusations will get repeated on an on): "user who spends much=20
of his wiki-time IMing with notorious nationalist edit-warriors (like=20
Alden Jones...)", "That the editors who've joined you here are your=20
normal tag-teamers"

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3ASandstein&diff=3D=
282633373&oldid=3D282633058]:=20
here Deacon appears on talk page to defend an editor that offended me=20
and slanders me again: "it's rather saintly compared with much of the=20
stuff... Piotrus' allies say but never gets reported...

* April 9: Accusing other editors:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Jogaila&diff=3D282714988&=
oldid=3D282714688=20
of nationalism]

*May 21: just few days after returning from his 1-month wikibreak,=20
Deacon becomes involved in a SPI case involving a Polish user, and=20
becomes the only non-SPI/CU/ArbCom official to see the "secret evidence"=20
in this case:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Sockpuppet_investiga=
tions/Molobo&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D291375384].=20
Requests from other non-SPI/CU/ArbCom editors to obtain this evidence,=20
and to ask why Deacon obtained this evidence, are ignored or rejected.

*May 31:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_=
noticeboard&diff=3D293606105&oldid=3D293602145=20
bad faith against Polish users in general and Piotrus in particular]

*June 2:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3AAvraham&diff=3D294=
030252&oldid=3D294029001=20
Bad faith, PA against me]

*June 3:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=3D294165024&oldid=3D294163865=20
bad faith], note=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=3D294193718&oldid=3D294184461=20
that an editor was offended]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzi=
m&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D294155101=20
refusal to discuss his behavior]

*June 5:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzi=
m&diff=3D294456430&oldid=3D294450386=20
refuses mediation, assumes bad faith]

*June 8:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Jacurek&diff=3Dprev&=
oldid=3D295013000=20
abuse of admin powers]
*June 8:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim=
&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D295082429=20
refusal to discuss the issues, removing any criticism as "slanderous=20
personal attacks"] and=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim=
&diff=3D295112666&oldid=3D295112174=20
closing the discussion]
*June 8:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim=
&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D295086772=20
bad faith towards administrative actions of others]
*June 8:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27=
_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=3D295085030&oldid=3D295084717=20
accusing an editor of being "a hard-core edit warrior"]
*June 8: more bad faith and PAs:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests=
/Enforcement&diff=3D295190903&oldid=3D295190539=20
I would ask however that Radeksz is added to the Diguren case. He=20
appears to be a one-purpose nationalist account who does nothing on=20
wikipedia but edit-war against German and Lithuanian users (mainly=20
German users), and then go shopping against them.]
*June 8:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests=
/Enforcement&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D295205955=20
bad faith: "Poland-Lithuania-Russia axis"... clear dislike users in this=20
area have towards me]
*June 8:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests=
/Enforcement&diff=3Dprev&oldid=3D295218878=20
bad faith towards others, characterizing his opponents as "battlers"]
*June 8:=20
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests=
/Enforcement&diff=3D295226926&oldid=3D295226895=20
more ofthe above: "satisfaction of the fictional anti-Polishness=20
conveniently manufactured by the tendentious swarm above"]

--=20
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny=A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0|||____=A0 __ __
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=
=A0=A0I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=3D>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."=A0 =A0=A0=A0|||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
=A0 -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
=0A=0A=0A      
--0-836276609-1244519594=:28757
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;"><DIV>OK, fine. Now let me know about some pos=
sibility of using this list in the future. I will gladly copy and paste it =
wherever it is useful, unless you want to do it of course. </DIV>
<DIV>Tymek<BR><BR>--- On <B>Mon, 6/8/09, Piotr Konieczny <I>&lt;piokon@post=
.pl&gt;</I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(=
16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: Piotr Konieczny &lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;<BR>S=
ubject: Re: [WPM] Deacon abuse of Jacurek (was Taking on Deacon)<BR>To: "Wi=
kipedia statistics" &lt;folks@wikipedometer.net&gt;<BR>Date: Monday, June 8=
, 2009, 4:42 PM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=3DplainMail>piotr micula wrote:<BR>&gt; Piotrus, do you have any=
 diffs to prove our point against Deacon? If you <BR>&gt; do, please share =
them here.<BR><BR>This is my up-to-date evidence list against Deacon:<BR><B=
R>* stalking by D<BR><BR>Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Eastern_Europea=
n_disputes/Evidence#Tag_team_1:_Russian<BR><BR>* February 4 and 5, 2009 at =
AE: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:A=
dministrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;ol=
did=3D268589325" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=
=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=
=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D268589325</A>], <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org=
/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_en=
forcement&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D268735675"
 target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Admi=
nistrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=
=3D268735675</A>] <BR><BR>*February 25, 2009 at article discussion: <BR>[<A=
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk%3AHolocaust_in_Li=
thuania&amp;diff=3D273253643&amp;oldid=3D273250888" target=3D_blank>http://=
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk%3AHolocaust_in_Lithuania&amp;diff=
=3D273253643&amp;oldid=3D273250888</A>]<BR><BR>*February: <BR>[<A href=3D"h=
ttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Requests_for_arbitrati=
on&amp;oldid=3D270472942#Request_for_clarification:_Wikipedia:Requests_for_=
arbitration.2FEastern_European_disputes" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedi=
a.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&amp;oldid=3D27=
0472942#Request_for_clarification:_Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration.2FEas=
tern_European_disputes</A>]<BR>an ArbCom clarification request, in which De=
acon tries to portray may
 <BR>normal administrative actions as some sort of wrongdoing, again. To <B=
R>quote from Coren: "what I see is a 3RR report that was closed <BR>uncontr=
oversially and properly (and which nobody contests on its face, <BR>for tha=
t matter), and a thread on AE that attempts to rely on a tenuous <BR>possib=
le conflict of interest to invoke sanctions according to a <BR>particularil=
y imaginative reading of a remedy which was swiftly (and <BR>correctly) clo=
sed as unactionable. It is impossible, in this context, to <BR>see this req=
uest as little more than forum shopping; and an attempt to <BR>misuse the c=
ommittee into a bludgeon in a vendetta." But Deacon didn't <BR>even get a w=
arning.<BR><BR>*April 3 and 4, 2009 at article and policy space: <BR>[<A hr=
ef=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DBattle_of_Vilnius_%281655=
%29&amp;diff=3D281534126&amp;oldid=3D281530841"
 target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DBattle_of_Viln=
ius_%281655%29&amp;diff=3D281534126&amp;oldid=3D281530841</A> <BR>move], an=
d when at talk <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3D=
Talk:Battle_of_Vilnius_" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph=
p?title=3DTalk:Battle_of_Vilnius_</A>(1655)&amp;diff=3D281724660&amp;oldid=
=3D281724299 <BR>I cite a naming policy in support of a version], <BR>[<A h=
ref=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3ANaming_conve=
ntions_%28geographic_names%29&amp;diff=3D281729338&amp;oldid=3D281533853" t=
arget=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3ANami=
ng_conventions_%28geographic_names%29&amp;diff=3D281729338&amp;oldid=3D2815=
33853</A> <BR>he changes the estabilished policy]! (he does so again on <BR=
>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Naming_c=
onventions_"
 target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Nami=
ng_conventions_</A>(geographic_names)&amp;diff=3D282447250&amp;oldid=3D2824=
46029 <BR>April 7] and <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?=
title=3DWikipedia%3ANaming_conventions_%28geographic_names%29&amp;diff=3D28=
2811646&amp;oldid=3D282716398" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/in=
dex.php?title=3DWikipedia%3ANaming_conventions_%28geographic_names%29&amp;d=
iff=3D282811646&amp;oldid=3D282716398</A> <BR>on April 9], then responds wi=
th <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Battle_=
of_Vilnius_" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTa=
lk:Battle_of_Vilnius_</A>(1655)&amp;diff=3D281729768&amp;oldid=3D281729093 =
<BR>personal remarks on talk] (also <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org=
/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Battle_of_Vilnius_" target=3D_blank>http://en.wik=
ipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Battle_of_Vilnius_</A>(1655)&amp;diff=
=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281848806 <BR>here])
 and misrepresents the case at <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/in=
dex.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=
=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281718073" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/in=
dex.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=
=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281718073</A> <BR>WP:ANI] criticizing Polish editors, t=
hen launches a clear personal <BR>attack: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikiped=
ia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incident=
s&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281909360" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedi=
a.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents=
&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281909360</A> <BR>"Piotrus, partizan campaigni=
ng with personal attacks and straw men on <BR>AN/I is not likely to produce=
 any results for you"], and another one: <BR>[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrato=
rs%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281996850" target=
=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrat=
ors%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D281996850</A> <BR>=
"I honestly can't see any useful purpose to your participation in this <BR>=
thread except as partizan campaigning; unless that is stacking up Polish <B=
R>votes to to Polonise the name of the Lithuanian capital has nothing to <B=
R>do with nationalism."]<BR><BR>Please note that Deacon refuses to answer h=
ow he became aware of my edit <BR>to this orphaned article <BR>([<A href=3D=
"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim=
&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D282009689" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia=
.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp=
;oldid=3D282009689</A>]).<BR><BR>*previous attempts at dispute resolution:
 <BR>[[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Bad_faith_towards_me\Wikiquette alerts]]=
 <BR>(April 5): I've asked Deacon to apologize for his uncivil remarks <BR>=
towards me; he instead <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?=
title=3DWikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&amp;diff=3D282002372&amp;oldid=3D2819=
98868" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedi=
a%3AWikiquette_alerts&amp;diff=3D282002372&amp;oldid=3D281998868</A> <BR>re=
peats them and adds new ones]: "You then joined in with straw men and <BR>p=
ersonal attacks... I've been very moderate about using the "N word" in <BR>=
the context of Piotrus' campaign to change the name of a Lithuanian city <B=
R>to a Polish spelling... Piotrus, please stop with the frivolous <BR>forum=
-shopping and please let a "debate" remain a debate without trying <BR>to e=
scalate it into a dispute". He also accused me of "disrupting ANI", <BR>&nb=
sp; making <BR>[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AWikiquette=
_alerts&amp;diff=3D282006059&amp;oldid=3D282005792" target=3D_blank>http://=
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&amp;diff=
=3D282006059&amp;oldid=3D282005792</A> <BR>personal attacks] towards him (I=
 dearly invite anybody to read the post <BR>in his diff and try to find any=
 personal attack there) and of <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/in=
dex.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=
=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D282006979" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/in=
dex.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=
=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D282006979</A> <BR>nationalist POV] <BR>([<A href=3D"htt=
p://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_notice=
board/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D282007762"
 target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Admi=
nistrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D282007762</=
A> <BR>also here]). His final comment at wikiquette indicated no good will =
<BR>towards dispute resolution: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/i=
ndex.php?title=3DWikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D28=
2007379" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipe=
dia:Wikiquette_alerts&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D282007379</A> <BR>"The ph=
oney indignation is boring, and nothing's gonna happen here. <BR>Please jus=
t stop all this drama-mongering"]. --~~~~<BR><BR>*April 6: as he has done i=
n the past, Deacon appears immediately in a <BR>thread I opened at AE, even=
 through it doesn't concern him at all, to <BR>defend an editor I complaine=
d about: <BR>[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministra=
tors%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282216930&amp;oldi=
d=3D282211595" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3D=
Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&amp;dif=
f=3D282216930&amp;oldid=3D282211595</A>] <BR>; he there accuses me of "foru=
m-shopping", and categorizes those who <BR>disagree with the editor I disag=
ree with as "tendentious multi-blocked <BR>nationalists trolls". Next, he m=
akes an unbacked personal attack at <BR>another Polish user, Radeksz ("he (=
Dr. Dan) is not by any means half as <BR>problematic a user as, for instanc=
e, User:Radeksz whom Piotrus has gone <BR>to a lot of trouble to protect").=
 He then hijacks the AE request by <BR>posting obsolete (last arbcom) evide=
nce against Radeksz: <BR>[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrato=
rs%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282236979&amp;oldid=3D=
282232264" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWiki=
pedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D2822=
36979&amp;oldid=3D282232264</A>]. <BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Note that he uses e=
vidence and claims from the rejected arbitration <BR>clarification request =
to smear my and Radeksz name.<BR>Third 3RR violation: Piotrus closes the is=
sue himself to avoid a block" <BR>and so on. Note also that <BR>[<A href=3D=
"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_no=
ticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282237414&amp;oldid=3D28223716=
5" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Ad=
ministrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282237414&am=
p;oldid=3D282237165</A> <BR>he moves Radeksz post] like he did with mine ea=
rlier, with potentially
 <BR>confusing results. When I attempted to structure the discussion, he <B=
R>reverted me with an uncivil edit summary <BR>([<A href=3D"http://en.wikip=
edia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FAr=
bitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282275525&amp;oldid=3D282275111" target=3D=
_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrato=
rs%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282275525&amp;oldid=
=3D282275111</A>]). <BR>Subsequently, a neutral admin reviewing this case <=
BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3ADeac=
on_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3D282278967&amp;oldid=3D282277765" target=3D_blan=
k>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3ADeacon_of_Pndapet=
zim&amp;diff=3D282278967&amp;oldid=3D282277765</A> <BR>supported my edit], =
as <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Ad=
ministrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282288194&am=
p;oldid=3D282287798"
 target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Admi=
nistrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282288194&amp;=
oldid=3D282287798</A> <BR>did another].<BR><BR>*April 7: <BR>[<A href=3D"ht=
tp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_talk:Requested_moves&am=
p;diff=3D282445068&amp;oldid=3D282443991" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikiped=
ia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_talk:Requested_moves&amp;diff=3D282445=
068&amp;oldid=3D282443991</A> <BR>Deacon presents an analysis of vote], div=
iding users into ethnic camps, <BR>with bad faith assumptions "long term al=
ly of certain users", "(followed <BR>user X and opposed him". Notably, the =
bad faith assumptions are limited <BR>to the users opposing him; and the et=
hnic analysis is twisted - in an <BR>attempt to show how Poles outvote Lith=
uanians, Lithuanian users agreeing <BR>with Deacon and living in US are sho=
wn as Americans <BR>([<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_talk%3AReque=
sted_moves&amp;diff=3D282579954&amp;oldid=3D282504996" target=3D_blank>http=
://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia_talk%3ARequested_moves&am=
p;diff=3D282579954&amp;oldid=3D282504996</A>]), <BR>but Poles living in US =
are, well, Poles...<BR><BR>*[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php=
?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcemen=
t&amp;diff=3D282467288&amp;oldid=3D282463214" target=3D_blank>http://en.wik=
ipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2F=
Arbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282467288&amp;oldid=3D282463214</A> <BR>=
more bad faith and slander]: "the four users are all your normal <BR>tag-te=
am partners I'd expect to turn up here....", "It's no secret that <BR>I am =
one of many many users who have had a problem with much of your <BR>behavio=
ur Piotrus," "The long old ad hominems you've been in the habit <BR>of laun=
ching against me and any
 one else whenever they try to ensure a <BR>fair hearing for one of your id=
eological "opponents" won't make your <BR>"evidence" against this one any s=
tronger"<BR><BR>*stalking: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.=
php?title=3DWikipedia_talk%3ARequested_moves&amp;diff=3D282436896&amp;oldid=
=3D282435103" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DW=
ikipedia_talk%3ARequested_moves&amp;diff=3D282436896&amp;oldid=3D282435103<=
/A> <BR>Deacon appears on a Wikipedia page and answers my question, defendi=
ng a <BR>disruptive user]<BR><BR>*[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/ind=
ex.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enfo=
rcement&amp;diff=3D282618987&amp;oldid=3D282609281" target=3D_blank>http://=
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticebo=
ard%2FArbitration_enforcement&amp;diff=3D282618987&amp;oldid=3D282609281</A=
>]: <BR>Deacon misrepresents the arbcom case, accuses me of "edit-warring i=
n <BR>with poorly-sourced
 nationalistic nonsense against consensus," (and also <BR>slanders other ed=
itors: "no-one's gonna care, as most of the AE admins <BR>have done much wo=
rse"). He repeats claims from last ArbCom that were <BR>dismissed by arbcom=
 (but were not clearly rejected, so as I predicted, <BR>all the accusations=
 will get repeated on an on): "user who spends much <BR>of his wiki-time IM=
ing with notorious nationalist edit-warriors (like <BR>Alden Jones...)", "T=
hat the editors who've joined you here are your <BR>normal tag-teamers"<BR>=
<BR>*[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3ASa=
ndstein&amp;diff=3D282633373&amp;oldid=3D282633058" target=3D_blank>http://=
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3ASandstein&amp;diff=3D28263=
3373&amp;oldid=3D282633058</A>]: <BR>here Deacon appears on talk page to de=
fend an editor that offended me <BR>and slanders me again: "it's rather sai=
ntly compared with much of the <BR>stuff... Piotrus' allies say but never g=
ets
 reported...<BR><BR>* April 9: Accusing other editors: <BR>[<A href=3D"http=
://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DTalk:Jogaila&amp;diff=3D282714988&a=
mp;oldid=3D282714688" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t=
itle=3DTalk:Jogaila&amp;diff=3D282714988&amp;oldid=3D282714688</A> <BR>of n=
ationalism]<BR><BR>*May 21: just few days after returning from his 1-month =
wikibreak, <BR>Deacon becomes involved in a SPI case involving a Polish use=
r, and <BR>becomes the only non-SPI/CU/ArbCom official to see the "secret e=
vidence" <BR>in this case: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.=
php?title=3DWikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Molobo&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;=
oldid=3D291375384" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?titl=
e=3DWikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Molobo&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D=
291375384</A>]. <BR>Requests from other non-SPI/CU/ArbCom editors to obtain=
 this evidence, <BR>and to ask why Deacon obtained this evidence, are ignor=
ed or
 rejected.<BR><BR>*May 31: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.=
php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&amp;diff=3D293606105&=
amp;oldid=3D293602145" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?=
title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&amp;diff=3D293606105&amp;=
oldid=3D293602145</A> <BR>bad faith against Polish users in general and Pio=
trus in particular]<BR><BR>*June 2: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org=
/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3AAvraham&amp;diff=3D294030252&amp;oldid=3D2=
94029001" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_=
talk%3AAvraham&amp;diff=3D294030252&amp;oldid=3D294029001</A> <BR>Bad faith=
, PA against me]<BR><BR>*June 3: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/=
index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&amp;=
diff=3D294165024&amp;oldid=3D294163865"
 target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Admi=
nistrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&amp;diff=3D294165024&amp;oldid=3D294=
163865</A> <BR>bad faith], note <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/i=
ndex.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&amp;d=
iff=3D294193718&amp;oldid=3D294184461" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.=
org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warrin=
g&amp;diff=3D294193718&amp;oldid=3D294184461</A> <BR>that an editor was off=
ended]<BR>*[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_tal=
k:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D294155101" target=3D_bla=
nk>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetz=
im&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D294155101</A> <BR>refusal to discuss his beh=
avior]<BR><BR>*June 5:<BR>*[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?=
title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3D294456430&amp;oldid=3D294=
450386"
 target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deac=
on_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3D294456430&amp;oldid=3D294450386</A> <BR>refuses=
 mediation, assumes bad faith]<BR><BR>*June 8: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wi=
kipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Jacurek&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=
=3D295013000" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DU=
ser_talk:Jacurek&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295013000</A> <BR>abuse of adm=
in powers]<BR>*June 8: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?=
title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D29508242=
9" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:De=
acon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295082429</A> <BR>refusal to=
 discuss the issues, removing any criticism as "slanderous <BR>personal att=
acks"] and <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser=
_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3D295112666&amp;oldid=3D295112174"
 target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deac=
on_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3D295112666&amp;oldid=3D295112174</A> <BR>closing=
 the discussion]<BR>*June 8: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/inde=
x.php?title=3DUser_talk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D29=
5086772" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_t=
alk:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295086772</A> <BR>bad =
faith towards administrative actions of others]<BR>*June 8:<BR>*[<A href=3D=
"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_=
noticeboard%2FIncidents&amp;diff=3D295085030&amp;oldid=3D295084717" target=
=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia%3AAdministr=
ators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&amp;diff=3D295085030&amp;oldid=3D295084717=
</A> <BR>accusing an editor of being "a hard-core edit warrior"]<BR>*June 8=
: more bad faith and PAs: <BR>[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/=
Requests/Enforcement&amp;diff=3D295190903&amp;oldid=3D295190539" target=3D_=
blank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Req=
uests/Enforcement&amp;diff=3D295190903&amp;oldid=3D295190539</A> <BR>I woul=
d ask however that Radeksz is added to the Diguren case. He <BR>appears to =
be a one-purpose nationalist account who does nothing on <BR>wikipedia but =
edit-war against German and Lithuanian users (mainly <BR>German users), and=
 then go shopping against them.]<BR>*June 8: <BR>[<A href=3D"http://en.wiki=
pedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&am=
p;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295205955" target=3D_blank>http://en.wikipedia.or=
g/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&amp;diff=
=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295205955</A> <BR>bad faith: "Poland-Lithuania-Russia a=
xis"... clear dislike users in this <BR>area have towards me]<BR>*June 8: <=
BR>[<A
 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/=
Requests/Enforcement&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295218878" target=3D_blank=
>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests=
/Enforcement&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D295218878</A> <BR>bad faith toward=
s others, characterizing his opponents as "battlers"]<BR>*June 8: <BR>[<A h=
ref=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Re=
quests/Enforcement&amp;diff=3D295226926&amp;oldid=3D295226895" target=3D_bl=
ank>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DWikipedia:Arbitration/Reque=
sts/Enforcement&amp;diff=3D295226926&amp;oldid=3D295226895</A> <BR>more oft=
he above: "satisfaction of the fictional anti-Polishness <BR>conveniently m=
anufactured by the tendentious swarm above"]<BR><BR>-- <BR>Prokonsul Piotru=
s aka Piotr Konieczny&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;|||____&nbsp; __ __<BR=
>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbs=
p; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;I=3DI=3D=3D=3D=3D__|_|I__I=
=3D&gt;<BR>"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
|||<BR>"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."<BR>&nbsp; -- I=
vanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"<BR><BR>_____________=
__________________________________<BR>Wikipedia statistics discussion list<=
BR><A href=3D"http://us.mc328.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=3Dfolks@wikipedo=
meter.net" ymailto=3D"mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net">folks@wikipedometer.n=
et</A><BR><A href=3D"http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folk=
s" target=3D_blank>http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks<=
/A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table><br>=0A=0A      
--0-836276609-1244519594=:28757--


--===============4321423156094730512==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4321423156094730512==--


