X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Apr 24 21:13:55 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <567153.99835.qm@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <567153.99835.qm@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:13:45 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0904241213r691901fctfbed5578a9af5515@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 21:29, Christian Suciu
	<christiansuciu@yahoo.com>wrote: > It's really up to you guys - I think
	this is one time our team can, through > effective coordination, achieve
	some real results. Let's not allow the > opportunity to pass. I'm
	willing to help however I can, but I won't make a > move without orders
	(so to speak), as I'm not as familiar with Russavia as > with previous
	problem editors, and don't want to inadvertently cause this > chance to
	blow up. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] GFDL
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7400942955438353027=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.8
X-Spam_score_int: 18
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 21:29, Christian Suciu
	<christiansuciu@yahoo.com>wrote: > It's really up to you guys - I think
	this is one time our team can, through > effective coordination, achieve
	some real results. Let's not allow the > opportunity to pass. I'm
	willing to help however I can, but I won't make a > move without orders
	(so to speak), as I'm not as familiar with Russavia as > with previous
	problem editors, and don't want to inadvertently cause this > chance to
	blow up. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4053]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============7400942955438353027==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5ba67b98066046851cb89

--001636c5ba67b98066046851cb89
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 21:29, Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>wrote:

> It's really up to you guys - I think this is one time our team can, through
> effective coordination, achieve some real results. Let's not allow the
> opportunity to pass. I'm willing to help however I can, but I won't make a
> move without orders (so to speak), as I'm not as familiar with Russavia as
> with previous problem editors, and don't want to inadvertently cause this
> chance to blow up.


Whoever will bring the topic of Russavia up will be asked, *why* would they
analyse Russavia's contribution history in the first place?

I think the best suggestion is: because there were rumours that there was
something anomalous about them.  Biophys has been pointing it out, for
example.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5ba67b98066046851cb89
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 21:29, Christian Suciu <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:christiansuciu@yahoo.com">christians=
uciu@yahoo.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0"><tbody><tr><td vali=
gn=3D"top" style=3D"font:inherit">It&#39;s really up to you guys - I think =
this is one time our team can, through effective coordination, achieve some=
 real results. Let&#39;s not allow the opportunity to pass. I&#39;m willing=
 to help however I can, but I won&#39;t make a move without orders (so to s=
peak), as I&#39;m not as familiar with Russavia as with previous problem ed=
itors, and don&#39;t want to inadvertently cause this chance to blow up.</t=
d>
</tr></tbody></table></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Whoever will bring th=
e topic of Russavia up will be asked, *why* would they analyse Russavia&#39=
;s contribution history in the first place?</div><div><br></div><div>I thin=
k the best suggestion is: because there were rumours that there was somethi=
ng anomalous about them. =C2=A0Biophys has been pointing it out, for exampl=
e.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5ba67b98066046851cb89--


--===============7400942955438353027==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============7400942955438353027==--


