X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:35:24 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906211433t62c6e753u9887a81dbc24f5b9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3EA461.2050208@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906211423x2123ead9v1da04a5fa7e3242c@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211428y5ea28c88wafdde68863c6a2bd@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211433t62c6e753u9887a81dbc24f5b9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:35:13 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906211435o2eb96ffctff3a6becea4e2881@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:33, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Neither Cbrown1023 or Rlevse are active.
	I've got mixed feelings about > AGK too but he's at least familiar with
	the Deacon case. Other > possibilities are Ryan Postlewaite (my time
	zone), Tiptoety > (California, 8 hours), Nixeagle (New York, 6 hours) -
	whom I only > recall from somewhere but don't know his attitudes. [...]
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4484362211380937766=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:33, radek szulga
	<rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote: > Neither Cbrown1023 or Rlevse are active.
	I've got mixed feelings about > AGK too but he's at least familiar with
	the Deacon case. Other > possibilities are Ryan Postlewaite (my time
	zone), Tiptoety > (California, 8 hours), Nixeagle (New York, 6 hours) -
	whom I only > recall from somewhere but don't know his attitudes. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============4484362211380937766==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b7c66a540c046ce28827

--001636c5b7c66a540c046ce28827
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:33, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:

> Neither Cbrown1023 or Rlevse are active. I've got mixed feelings about
> AGK too but he's at least familiar with the Deacon case. Other
> possibilities are Ryan Postlewaite (my time zone), Tiptoety
> (California, 8 hours), Nixeagle (New York, 6 hours) - whom I only
> recall from somewhere but don't know his attitudes.


Tiptoety sounds good.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c5b7c66a540c046ce28827
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 00:33, radek szulga <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsszulga@gmail.com">rsszulga@gmail.com<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:=
0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Neither Cbrown1023 or Rlevse are active. I&#39;ve got mixed feelings about<=
br>
AGK too but he&#39;s at least familiar with the Deacon case. Other<br>
possibilities are Ryan Postlewaite (my time zone), Tiptoety<br>
(California, 8 hours), Nixeagle (New York, 6 hours) - whom I only<br>
recall from somewhere but don&#39;t know his attitudes.</blockquote><div><b=
r></div><div>Tiptoety sounds good.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres =
Soolo<br>

--001636c5b7c66a540c046ce28827--


--===============4484362211380937766==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============4484362211380937766==--


