X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Thu Jun  4 10:08:48 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A2780E5.7080709@post.pl>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:08:05 +0200
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <4A2625B5.7010705@post.pl>	<25890ca0906030113r295a1e3as1452b924a5f7a55f@mail.gmail.com>	<25890ca0906031153u6f231517n51cd4e0f21aec4fb@mail.gmail.com>	<4A26ED7C.80705@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906031456u415cb794w9908c88da07ac212@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906031456u415cb794w9908c88da07ac212@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > Yeah, I can file the one for
	Kurfurst as a sort of a test case. My > main worry is that if I file
	these sooner or later, Sandstein, or some > other involved admin, is
	going to decide that I need to be placed on > notice too - and I like
	my
	(limited) "get out of jail free" card. > It will also be interesting to
	see who shows up for Kurfurst (if > Deacon makes a few more remarks and
	Matthead decides to chime it ... > ahhh, that'd be a trifecta). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Taking on Deacon
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  radek szulga wrote: > Yeah, I can file the one for
	Kurfurst as a sort of a test case. My > main worry is that if I file
	these sooner or later, Sandstein, or some > other involved admin, is
	going to decide that I need to be placed on > notice too - and I like my
	(limited) "get out of jail free" card. > It will also be interesting to
	see who shows up for Kurfurst (if > Deacon makes a few more remarks and
	Matthead decides to chime it ... > ahhh, that'd be a trifecta). [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

radek szulga wrote:
> Yeah, I can file the one for Kurfurst as a sort of a test case. My
> main worry is that if I file these sooner or later, Sandstein, or some
> other involved admin, is going to decide that I need to be placed on
> notice too - and I like my (limited) "get out of jail free" card.
> It will also be interesting to see who shows up for Kurfurst (if
> Deacon makes a few more remarks and Matthead decides to chime it ...
> ahhh, that'd be a trifecta).

You cannot be placed on those unless you do something bad. Filing an AE 
case is fine till admins start warning you that your cases have no 
merit. As long as they do, and I think we are wise enough not to spam AE 
with pointless cases, we should be fine.

I suggest we review AE drafts here before we send them in. And I think 
we should rescue the Skapperod's RfC drafted by Molobo. It has potential 
to do some good. Molobo, have you talked to Woogie as I suggested and 
asked him if he would be willing to start it?

-- 
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

