X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 21 23:04:03 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211401s5b6f5011hc6c5073933981872@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:03:40 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211403v2e2b9beep263b646b1188bd4e@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: He just took a huuuuuggggggeeeee step backward with
	his
	latest redact - he realized he got ahead of himself. Still, it shows his
	prejudices and that he definitely is either a) on a power trip or b)
	has
	a personal grudge here. This is the sort of wavering that needs to be
	exploited. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  He just took a huuuuuggggggeeeee step backward with his
	latest redact - he realized he got ahead of himself. Still, it shows his
	prejudices and that he definitely is either a) on a power trip or b) has
	a personal grudge here. This is the sort of wavering that needs to be
	exploited. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

He just took a huuuuuggggggeeeee step backward with his latest redact
- he realized he got ahead of himself. Still, it shows his prejudices
and that he definitely is either a) on a power trip or b) has a
personal grudge here. This is the sort of wavering that needs to be
exploited.

Radek


2009/6/21 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 23:47, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I surprised:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk%3APiotrus&diff=3D2=
97788006&oldid=3D297787433
>> I tried talking to him nicely on AE/talk pages, but he replies with
>> this. Should I go to AN, ANI or some ArbCom page to deal with this? Best
>> argument so far is that nobody else criticized my posts and he didn't
>> even cite diffs to what exactly in my posts was unhelpful/inflammatory.
>
> It's a clear example of incivility, disrespect for a fellow administrator,
> and can be painted as a power trip. =A0I think we want a speedy resolutio=
n,
> therefore arbcom is out. =A0AN/I or Jimbo's talkpage?
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

