X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Apr 12 14:00:53 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <49E0FD42.1000504@post.pl>
References: <929ed1ec0904101249h7aa04181j85b0c8957838a551@mail.gmail.com>
	<49E0FD42.1000504@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:00:40 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880904120500l714c5b22n87ff7aa03d934388@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Digwuren wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Beatle Fab Four
	has, after a long while, sprung into action. As usual, >> he seems to be
	concerned with persistently reverting my edits on a few >> pages. > >
	If
	you can show that this is statistically true, you can report him to >
	ANI as a single purpose disruptive account. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] BFF is back
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/private/folks>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.3
X-Spam_score_int: -2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Digwuren wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Beatle Fab Four
	has, after a long while, sprung into action. As usual, >> he seems to be
	concerned with persistently reverting my edits on a few >> pages. > > If
	you can show that this is statistically true, you can report him to >
	ANI as a single purpose disruptive account. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0003]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.6 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
> Digwuren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Beatle Fab Four has, after a long while, sprung into action. =A0As usual,
>> he seems to be concerned with persistently reverting my edits on a few
>> pages.
>
> If you can show that this is statistically true, you can report him to
> ANI as a single purpose disruptive account.

I had a quick look at his edits, and they all seem to be just reverts
with incivil comments. I was actually going to lodge a report on ANI
myself in the next couple of days.

Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

