X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 14 06:47:22 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A34814C.9070002@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:49:16 -0400
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <cd9.532840bd.37653144@aol.com>
	<929ed1ec0906131243s263abe81ia0134d6c8658e4e3@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906131243s263abe81ia0134d6c8658e4e3@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > If your conscience demands it,
	I guess
	the least harmful way would be to > write a private mail to Sandstein, 
	and in it repeatedly explain that it > is about due process, and
	definitely not about criticism of Sandstein. > Especially that you will
	not raise the issue in any public venue. Keep > in mind that Sandstein
	can probably understand the situation in private, > but if he were to
	actually revert his decision, a lot of unnecessary > extra dramu would
	still be generated. At most, Sandstein might do > warning more
	diligently in the future. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 ADVANCE_FEE_1 Appears to be advance fee fraud (Nigerian 419)
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_1,AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Sandstein is done; Shotlandiya sanctioned
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > If your conscience demands it, I guess
	the least harmful way would be to > write a private mail to Sandstein,
	and in it repeatedly explain that it > is about due process, and
	definitely not about criticism of Sandstein. > Especially that you will
	not raise the issue in any public venue. Keep > in mind that Sandstein
	can probably understand the situation in private, > but if he were to
	actually revert his decision, a lot of unnecessary > extra dramu would
	still be generated. At most, Sandstein might do > warning more
	diligently in the future. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 ADVANCE_FEE_1          Appears to be advance fee fraud (Nigerian 419)
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Digwuren wrote:

> If your conscience demands it, I guess the least harmful way would be to 
> write a private mail to Sandstein, and in it repeatedly explain that it 
> is about due process, and definitely not about criticism of Sandstein. 
>  Especially that you will not raise the issue in any public venue.  Keep 
> in mind that Sandstein can probably understand the situation in private, 
> but if he were to actually revert his decision, a lot of unnecessary 
> extra dramu would still be generated.  At most, Sandstein might do 
> warning more diligently in the future.

This is indeed the best idea. Sandstein seems to be doing a decent and 
neutral job, we don't want to give others ammo to weaken/harass him, and 
at the same time establishing private lines of com with him and showing 
that we (those who contact him) are reasonable, merciful and so on is 
only to our benefit.

-- 
Piotr Konieczny

"The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in 
theory."

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

