X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 10 02:44:53 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
Message-ID: <4A2F01ED.9040901@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:44:29 +0200
From: Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
References: <929ed1ec0905311301o4ef132d2xa3674fbdd218fe3c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0905311301o4ef132d2xa3674fbdd218fe3c@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: Digwuren wrote: > Hypothesis (read: wild-assed guess):
	the DefendEachOther >
	<http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOther> ethic is a metric
	> of how established a wikicabal is. Established wikicabals can
	reliably
	> and consistently count on such mutual defence, and thus their members
	> tend to defend themselves on a less frequent basis. Newcomers, loners,
	> and members less socially cohesive wikicabals can not afford to rely
	on > such defence and thus, fearing that supportive points are not made
	at > all, are more inclined to push their own points. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] On wikistablishments
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.4
X-Spam_score_int: -23
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Digwuren wrote: > Hypothesis (read: wild-assed guess):
	the DefendEachOther >
	<http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOther> ethic is a metric
	> of how established a wikicabal is. Established wikicabals can reliably
	> and consistently count on such mutual defence, and thus their members
	> tend to defend themselves on a less frequent basis. Newcomers, loners,
	> and members less socially cohesive wikicabals can not afford to rely
	on > such defence and thus, fearing that supportive points are not made
	at > all, are more inclined to push their own points. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Digwuren wrote:
> Hypothesis (read: wild-assed guess): the DefendEachOther 
> <http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?DefendEachOther> ethic is a metric 
> of how established a wikicabal is.  Established wikicabals can reliably 
> and consistently count on such mutual defence, and thus their members 
> tend to defend themselves on a less frequent basis.  Newcomers, loners, 
> and members less socially cohesive wikicabals can not afford to rely on 
> such defence and thus, fearing that supportive points are not made at 
> all, are more inclined to push their own points.

I might have asked this before, but: will you post it in your own 
userspace as some for of a wiki essay? If not, I'd like to adapt it to 
my series of wiki essays.

-- 
Prokonsul Piotrus aka Piotr Konieczny       |||____  __ __
                                       I=I====__|_|I__I=>
"Lennier, get us the hell out of here."     |||
"Initiating 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver."
  -- Ivanova and Lennier in Babylon 5:"The Hour of the Wolf"

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

