X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun 14 13:04:55 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <495175.4564.qm@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <495175.4564.qm@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:04:38 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880906140404p1872db23qb8386f076dac3ec3@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Seems like a good strategy On Sun, Jun 14,
	2009 at 11:42
	AM, Christian Suciu<christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote: > Obviously this is
	a huge setback. But it's far from fatal. > a.) He's on a very strict
	set
	of conditions from ArbCom - one mistake and > he's out for good again.
	>
	b.) He will be monitored closely. COLLECT DIFFS! Since Dorin and I (and
	> Peters) know most about Romanian history, and since he mostly sticks
	to > Romanian topics, that task will largely fall to us. Once he's made
	5, 6, 7, > maybe 10 mistakes, we go straight to WP:AE (right?) and get
	the ban > restored. > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list >
	folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Dealing with Anonimu
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.2
X-Spam_score_int: -1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Seems like a good strategy On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:42
	AM, Christian Suciu<christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote: > Obviously this is
	a huge setback. But it's far from fatal. > a.) He's on a very strict set
	of conditions from ArbCom - one mistake and > he's out for good again. >
	b.) He will be monitored closely. COLLECT DIFFS! Since Dorin and I (and
	> Peters) know most about Romanian history, and since he mostly sticks
	to > Romanian topics, that task will largely fall to us. Once he's made
	5, 6, 7, > maybe 10 mistakes, we go straight to WP:AE (right?) and get
	the ban > restored. > > > Wikipedia statistics discussion list >
	folks@wikipedometer.net >
	http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks > > [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Seems like a good strategy

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Christian
Suciu<christiansuciu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Obviously this is a huge setback. But it's far from fatal.
> a.) He's on a very strict set of conditions from ArbCom - one mistake and
> he's out for good again.
> b.) He will be monitored closely. COLLECT DIFFS! Since Dorin and I (and
> Peters) know most about Romanian history, and since he mostly sticks to
> Romanian topics, that task will largely fall to us. Once he's made 5, 6, 7,
> maybe 10 mistakes, we go straight to WP:AE (right?) and get the ban
> restored.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

