X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 29 21:03:43 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906290618q1ef7f161o6445a189af59fb76@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A480401.9060205@post.pl>
	<4f045a880906281705k5d7967aaqbe2ad28ed8d8ee96@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906290052q39227fcfx1ed191605eea8367@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906290529n3ffb24ddj83448eeb9c055412@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906290618q1ef7f161o6445a189af59fb76@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:03:30 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906291203o76ea489fo32558aa02e15232d@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On this, I'd really like to throw my support behind
	Mosedschurte. Mostly because I think he's a great, very knowledgeable
	editor (he did wonders at Molotov-Ribbentrop) but also because I think
	that Viriditas is, to put it in previously mentioned language, a "little
	shit". I don't have time to find the diffs right now but he's got
	serious ownership issues with articles (particularly the Human Rights
	in
	US) and he's made several very incivil remarks to me, like "go away"
	"don't edit here" etc. in that vein. If someone can dig them up and
	make
	use of them in that discussion that'd be great. I'm trying to avoid
	drama for now and don't have much time. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Mosedschurte
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On this, I'd really like to throw my support behind
	Mosedschurte. Mostly because I think he's a great, very knowledgeable
	editor (he did wonders at Molotov-Ribbentrop) but also because I think
	that Viriditas is, to put it in previously mentioned language, a "little
	shit". I don't have time to find the diffs right now but he's got
	serious ownership issues with articles (particularly the Human Rights in
	US) and he's made several very incivil remarks to me, like "go away"
	"don't edit here" etc. in that vein. If someone can dig them up and make
	use of them in that discussion that'd be great. I'm trying to avoid
	drama for now and don't have much time. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

On this, I'd really like to throw my support behind Mosedschurte.
Mostly because I think he's a great, very knowledgeable editor (he did
wonders at Molotov-Ribbentrop) but also because I think that Viriditas
is, to put it in previously mentioned language, a "little shit". I
don't have time to find the diffs right now but he's got serious
ownership issues with articles (particularly the Human Rights in US)
and he's made several very incivil remarks to me, like
"go away"
"don't edit here"
etc. in that vein. If someone can dig them up and make use of them in
that discussion that'd be great. I'm trying to avoid drama for now and
don't have much time.

Radek


2009/6/29 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 15:29, Andrei Dombay <wikibiophys@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here it is:
>>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Viriditas#Comment_by_Mosedschurte
>>
>> If you like contributions by Viriditas, there is nothing wrong to comment.
>
> I don't, but I'd like the Cartel to take him on first if reasonably
> possible.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

