X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Fri Jun 19 09:15:46 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A3AD76A.8090306@post.pl>
References: <929ed1ec0906181233s287008a9he4fe6c05fe4cac6a@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181257q5ee1749ap4872a277af9b7a6f@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906181304x6fab2980se600cc88f41aaaf8@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906181350i5fbd4cc9u41114510a11eab2@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A3AD76A.8090306@post.pl>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:15:28 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906190015o65bf5f58lca22e90ce62945b1@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:10, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Andrei Dombay wrote: > > Agree. No comments
	unless one has good diffs. > > I'd still suggest a short comment
	denying
	the accusations, pointing out > their diffs are baseless, and also
	importantly pointing out that > baseless accusations of harassment are
	harassment themselves and > contribute to bad faith and battleground
	creation. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Offliner (Piotrus -- please advice)
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9188818366715031573=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.3
X-Spam_score_int: 3
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:10, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > Andrei Dombay wrote: > > Agree. No comments
	unless one has good diffs. > > I'd still suggest a short comment denying
	the accusations, pointing out > their diffs are baseless, and also
	importantly pointing out that > baseless accusations of harassment are
	harassment themselves and > contribute to bad faith and battleground
	creation. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.8 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============9188818366715031573==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502bad00448bc046cae4aff

--00504502bad00448bc046cae4aff
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:10, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> Andrei Dombay wrote:
> > Agree. No comments unless one has good diffs.
>
> I'd still suggest a short comment denying the accusations, pointing out
> their diffs are baseless, and also importantly pointing out that
> baseless accusations of harassment are harassment themselves and
> contribute to bad faith and battleground creation.


Short comment denying accusations is going to look like a handwave.

As for pointing out that the accusations are baseless -- I tried that in the
arbcom.  It didn't work.  The arbcom even refused to discuss the principle
that baseless accusations might be counterpolicy.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--00504502bad00448bc046cae4aff
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:10, Piotr Konieczny <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin=
: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">Andrei Dombay wrote:<br>
&gt; Agree. No comments unless one has good diffs.<br>
<br>
</div>I&#39;d still suggest a short comment denying the accusations, pointi=
ng out<br>
their diffs are baseless, and also importantly pointing out that<br>
baseless accusations of harassment are harassment themselves and<br>
contribute to bad faith and battleground creation.</blockquote><div><br>Sho=
rt comment denying accusations is going to look like a handwave.<br><br>As =
for pointing out that the accusations are baseless -- I tried that in the a=
rbcom.=C2=A0 It didn&#39;t work.=C2=A0 The arbcom even refused to discuss t=
he principle that baseless accusations might be counterpolicy.<br>
</div></div><br>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--00504502bad00448bc046cae4aff--


--===============9188818366715031573==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============9188818366715031573==--


