X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 15 15:23:08 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A352855.8050906@post.pl>
References: <960568.11005.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<4f045a880906140403s72981b45rf4637171b9a02615@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c9a05ec0906140435m2d05aaeaie9e2b51a864130a0@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906140444n44fcff93n30f04a77ea3955cc@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906140700g752710adke6a57dbf9250c8f7@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906140742h200f1a2bk7d266ba2df278d5d@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70906140746m3c83639cne6caa4f1e48a4e52@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A352855.8050906@post.pl>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:22:47 +0300
Message-ID: <6fb557d70906150622v1bf2135dr208e08f6e1e9aa56@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miacek and his crime-fighting dog <miacek08@googlemail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yes, thanx for additional information;
	I agree with you. Based on such edits
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Putinland&diff=274229532&oldid=274207642
	someone might perhaps want to describe me as a Putinist, too,
	perhaps.... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Mikkalai
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -2.5
X-Spam_score_int: -24
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yes, thanx for additional information; I agree with you.
	Based on such edits
	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Putinland&diff=274229532&oldid=274207642
	someone might perhaps want to describe me as a Putinist, too,
	perhaps.... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Yes, thanx for additional information; I agree with you. Based on such
edits http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Putinland&diff=274229532&oldid=274207642

someone might perhaps want to describe me as a Putinist, too, perhaps....

M

On 14/06/2009, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:
> Miacek and his crime-fighting dog wrote:
>> If 172 were puppet master  ''Jacob Peters'', how come all those
>> checkusers failed to reveal him? Would a shameless stalinist troll
>> with not much of iontellect successfully play the role of some scholar
>> for a long time? No, my two cents, but you may want to try a specific
>> CU, of course.
>
> I don't think there is much connection between 172 and JP. Long time ago
> I cooperated with 172 on Polish-Soviet War and had a positive
> experience; I respect him, while acknowledging his background (he is a
> Russian emigree academic living on US East coast). As far as I know, 172
> is a reasonable editor of Russian background. This
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decommunization_in_Russia&diff=295113031&oldid=291631836)
> hardly proves that he is a commie sympathizer.
>
> Remember - we are looking for trends, not exceptions/outliers). If you
> look hard enough, you may find edits by me that can be seen as
> pro-Soviet (heck, I wrote
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Brest_Fortress once, an article
> about a major Soviet propaganda-celebrated battle).
>
> --
> Piotr Konieczny
>
> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
> theory."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

