X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun  3 14:45:41 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A265B89.7090409@post.pl>
References: <4A238480.5040704@post.pl>
	<25890ca0906011151l21045a78n579e1ad2bf519f80@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906011524x15349ae0hfe6f40ecff5ddfbc@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906011555mf106db9rc3944fe7bd94d675@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A24C451.6010301@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906020151r2bc76954t97affdaa237a1d22@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fb557d70906020728g3afd6110l5f99cd93ddf01fff@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906020733q5e2c8b5cse87200771e07da23@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906030333q26f46d30yf9351f0e72b9165d@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A265B89.7090409@post.pl>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:45:26 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906030545n4ebf5b57m3ec56e1bb017d715@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 14:16, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > > Loosemark's actually doing quite a good job
	of keeping the heat on and > > asking some pertinent questions. > > Btw,
	who's Loosemark and what's his wikipolitic angle here? I don't > recall
	Loosemark editing any Polish-related subjects, so it is possible > he is
	simply grinding an axe against somebody, and by accident, is on > our
	side. What's his reputation? If he is a nutcase, his support and >
	alliance with him may not be in our own best interest... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] [WMP] Molobo ban
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2252158309985152046=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.2
X-Spam_score_int: 2
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 14:16, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > > Loosemark's actually doing quite a good job
	of keeping the heat on and > > asking some pertinent questions. > > Btw,
	who's Loosemark and what's his wikipolitic angle here? I don't > recall
	Loosemark editing any Polish-related subjects, so it is possible > he is
	simply grinding an axe against somebody, and by accident, is on > our
	side. What's his reputation? If he is a nutcase, his support and >
	alliance with him may not be in our own best interest... [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	1.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============2252158309985152046==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a3cb9cd45a046b710810

--001636c5a3cb9cd45a046b710810
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 14:16, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> > Loosemark's actually doing quite a good job of keeping the heat on and
> > asking some pertinent questions.
>
> Btw, who's Loosemark and what's his wikipolitic angle here? I don't
> recall Loosemark editing any Polish-related subjects, so it is possible
> he is simply grinding an axe against somebody, and by accident, is on
> our side. What's his reputation? If he is a nutcase, his support and
> alliance with him may not be in our own best interest...


No idea on reputation, but his recent interests appear to converge around
WWII, late Imperial Japanese military technology, and Poland.  Consider <
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DBeata_K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka&diff=
=3Dprev&oldid=3D250679113>,
for example -- it's a gnomish edit to a Polish article by Loosmark from las=
t
November.  Considering the difference in interest areas, probably Polish
interested in some aspects of Japan rather than the other way around.  The
fact that he's interested in Japanese involvement in its final (and
ultimately, losing) war rather than more popular, more glorious aspects of
Japanese history, is probably useful for further profiling.

If I didn't know any better, I'd suspect Loosmark was Piotrus' sock. :o)

I have not found obvious signs of nutjobbery.  For most of the part, he
appears to have followed a relatively peaceful wikicareer as newbies usuall=
y
go.  Probably worth defence, lest the Cabal figure out they still have the
power to get rid of him.

--=20
Andres Soolo

--001636c5a3cb9cd45a046b710810
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 14:16, Piotr Konieczny <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex">

<div>&gt; Loosemark&#39;s actually doing quite a good job of keeping the he=
at on and<br>
&gt; asking some pertinent questions.<br>
<br>
</div>Btw, who&#39;s Loosemark and what&#39;s his wikipolitic angle here? I=
 don&#39;t<br>
recall Loosemark editing any Polish-related subjects, so it is possible<br>
he is simply grinding an axe against somebody, and by accident, is on<br>
our side. What&#39;s his reputation? If he is a nutcase, his support and<br=
>
alliance with him may not be in our own best interest...</blockquote><div><=
br></div><div>No idea on reputation, but his recent interests appear to con=
verge around WWII, late Imperial Japanese military technology, and Poland. =
=C2=A0Consider &lt;<a href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DB=
eata_K" target=3D"_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DBeata=
_K</a>=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka&amp;diff=3Dprev&amp;oldid=3D250679113&gt;, for exa=
mple -- it&#39;s a gnomish edit to a Polish article by Loosmark from last N=
ovember. =C2=A0Considering the difference in interest areas, probably Polis=
h interested in some aspects of Japan rather than the other way around. =C2=
=A0The fact that he&#39;s interested in Japanese involvement in its final (=
and ultimately, losing)=C2=A0war rather than more popular, more glorious as=
pects of Japanese history, is probably useful for further profiling.</div>

<div><br></div><div>If I didn&#39;t know any better, I&#39;d suspect Loosma=
rk was Piotrus&#39; sock. :o)</div><div><br></div><div>I have not found obv=
ious signs of nutjobbery. =C2=A0For most of the part, he appears to have fo=
llowed a relatively peaceful wikicareer as newbies usually go. =C2=A0Probab=
ly worth defence, lest the Cabal figure out they still have the power to ge=
t rid of him.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c5a3cb9cd45a046b710810--


--===============2252158309985152046==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============2252158309985152046==--


