X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Wed Jun 24 21:33:07 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25890ca0906240015l1bde5829ndefef3bf88463ed7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <be0.5d360a6b.3772dc2e@aol.com>
	<4f045a880906232114w3ff23eecq4003babb5cfb380e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A41BFE1.1040300@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906232322j75e49886l9c7e7f39b12c6b97@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906232356n35f5c1bdrde771cc61c3a4a5c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A41D0F6.9070601@post.pl>
	<4f045a880906240012r495fe98i184a670bdb10830f@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906240015l1bde5829ndefef3bf88463ed7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:26:39 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906241226s12141f49va1d683acf46eea0f@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: I got too impatient about this and also wrote Thacher,
	elaborating a bit in reply to to the reply he gave to Jacurek (thanks!)
	on his talk page. I've been steaming about this all day and I need some
	kind of closure here either way or it will seriously interfere with the
	loads of work I've got to do. So please leave it alone for now and just
	let it play out. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Hello, Martin
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  I got too impatient about this and also wrote Thacher,
	elaborating a bit in reply to to the reply he gave to Jacurek (thanks!)
	on his talk page. I've been steaming about this all day and I need some
	kind of closure here either way or it will seriously interfere with the
	loads of work I've got to do. So please leave it alone for now and just
	let it play out. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I got too impatient about this and also wrote Thacher, elaborating a
bit in reply to to the reply he gave to Jacurek (thanks!) on his talk
page. I've been steaming about this all day and I need some kind of
closure here either way or it will seriously interfere with the loads
of work I've got to do.
So please leave it alone for now and just let it play out.

Radek


2009/6/24 radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>:
> This is what I wrote to Shelly:
>
> Hi, I've just received this notice:
> [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DUser_talk:Radeksz&diff=3Dcur=
#1RR_limit]
> and I'm not 100% sure what this is about. Apparently I'm mentioned
> once or twice at the
> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shell_Kinney/EEreportsreview]
> (which I didn't even see previously) which you started, though not as
> one of the "major editors". I've also made 3 reverts over a period of
> two weeks to the [[Nashi (youth movement)]] article that is mentioned
> on the restriction - which I don't think qualifies as "edit warring"
> by any definition I've encountered so far. It's probably true that I
> should've commented on the talk page along with my edits but at the
> time I thought my edit summaries were sufficient - request for a
> source for the claim and that I was reverting somebody who reverted
> without explanation. =A03 edits over the course of two weeks aren't
> always supported by lengthy talk page discussions. I feel like I've
> wound up as some kind of collateral damage to something and don't feel
> the restriction is appropriate, hence would like for a reconsideration
> (I'm a little afraid of emailing Thatcher lest this get even worse). I
> can voluntarily promise not to edit the Nashi (youth movement) article
> for period of 6 months (or longer if you'd like - I have no strong
> interest in it, I thought I was just doing regular clean up grunt work
> editing), and voluntarily limit myself to 1RR on all the articles
> listed at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shell_Kinney/EEreportsreview]
> for 6 months as well.
>
> Also, I'm going to be gone for the next 24 hours or so and will unable
> to deal with this matter. I feel like if this goes "stale" then it
> will become "status quo" and I won't have a chance of reversing it.
> Hence my appeal to you for at least a bit of advice and possibly a
> reversal of this. If you think it prudent I can email Thatcher
> directly or leave a comment on his/her talk page - though I won't be
> able to do so for awhile (I'm leaving in 5 minutes here)
>
> Thank you for your time
>
> Radek
>
> I don't have time to talk to Thatcher.
>
> Radek
>
> 2009/6/24 Martin <martint20@gmail.com>:
>> I've already written to Thatcher (I though he is a she) about
>> Colchicum, stating that while I don't often see eye to eye with this
>> young Russian he does have a clean block log. (Okay I fibbed, I quite
>> like the guy, but I wanted to show that I was being magnanimous and
>> Thatcher may believe he is of the opposing camp due to his ethnicity).
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Piotr Konieczny<piokon@post.pl> wrote:
>>> radek szulga wrote:
>>>> Crap. I'm super busy today and will be gone all day and I can't pursue
>>>> it. Can someone at least initiate the disucssion with Shelly or
>>>> Thathcher?
>>>
>>> A little delay may be good here; I do think you should be the one to
>>> start it by emailing Shelly as I noted previously. If you do so in 24h
>>> or so, this shouldn't be an issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Piotr Konieczny
>>>
>>> "The problem about Wikipedia is, that it just works in reality, not in
>>> theory."
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
>> folks@wikipedometer.net
>> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

