X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Mon Jun 22 00:48:38 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0906211533y1638c2d3oa11830253dafb791@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A3E9C6F.4040704@post.pl>
	<929ed1ec0906211430n74ede828t87898697dbadcaa0@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211432i395bb0d1v4ace9d2f4da52cc4@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211438u405219b9se5a775761f8b8a7e@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211441w1782cb63x753f942d98d167bb@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211507t40b06546n96fa2e485f48ec5@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211511v542ad8dj252f7043e6eb1bb8@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211522t16b93620r8ff75fc90b7ac43@mail.gmail.com>
	<25890ca0906211531w4fc9a4d0v22662eb8d7c3d0be@mail.gmail.com>
	<929ed1ec0906211533y1638c2d3oa11830253dafb791@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:48:29 -0500
Message-ID: <25890ca0906211548re27af99x8f55f211ce8eab67@mail.gmail.com>
From: radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: One more note: since Jeh is basically questioning the
	competence of the AE admins it might be worth while to offer a few
	words
	of support for Sandstein, AGK and that other fella somewhere - something
	along the lines of "they're working hard, sometimes they decided not
	quite in a way that I wanted, but I respect their hard work and they
	should be commended instead of having abuse heaped upon them. Overall
	for the most part they've decided cases correctly (include some
	examples
	where it was a pretty clear cut matter, like Smith2006)". Benefits is
	brownie points, positioning yourself as "part of the system" that bad
	admins like Jeh are trying to upset and polarizing some of the admins
	(hopefully separating those with obvious bad intentions like Jeh and
	Deacon from those who actually strive for some neutrality) Costs are
	potentially polarizing the admins and getting blamed for it. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Jehochmann and Piotrus
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  One more note: since Jeh is basically questioning the
	competence of the AE admins it might be worth while to offer a few words
	of support for Sandstein, AGK and that other fella somewhere - something
	along the lines of "they're working hard, sometimes they decided not
	quite in a way that I wanted, but I respect their hard work and they
	should be commended instead of having abuse heaped upon them. Overall
	for the most part they've decided cases correctly (include some examples
	where it was a pretty clear cut matter, like Smith2006)". Benefits is
	brownie points, positioning yourself as "part of the system" that bad
	admins like Jeh are trying to upset and polarizing some of the admins
	(hopefully separating those with obvious bad intentions like Jeh and
	Deacon from those who actually strive for some neutrality) Costs are
	potentially polarizing the admins and getting blamed for it. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-0.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.1 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

One more note: since Jeh is basically questioning the competence of
the AE admins it might be worth while to offer a few words of support
for Sandstein, AGK and that other fella somewhere - something along
the lines of "they're working hard, sometimes they decided not quite
in a way that I wanted, but I respect their hard work and they should
be commended instead of having abuse heaped upon them. Overall for the
most part they've decided cases correctly (include some examples where
it was a pretty clear cut matter, like Smith2006)".
Benefits is brownie points, positioning yourself as "part of the
system" that bad admins like Jeh are trying to upset and polarizing
some of the admins (hopefully separating those with obvious bad
intentions like Jeh and Deacon from those who actually strive for some
neutrality)
Costs are potentially polarizing the admins and getting blamed for it.

Radek


2009/6/21 Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:31, radek szulga <rsszulga@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Posted, at Newyorkbard's.
>
> The paragraph breaks are missing.
> --
> Andres Soolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia statistics discussion list
> folks@wikipedometer.net
> http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

