X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun Jun  7 10:26:25 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A2B71D2.5060408@post.pl>
References: <4fbe29dd0906061059v27b2dd97s9cac920e60ae110c@mail.gmail.com>
	<c3b2b3db0906061756o58c4d70id650fb8abfc67d93@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A2B71D2.5060408@post.pl>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:26:08 +0300
Message-ID: <929ed1ec0906070126m22ad6a39x7a2acc221b5c76c3@mail.gmail.com>
From: Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.4
X-Spam_score_int: 4
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:52, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > One more idea: > * wait a few days, let them
	think they won, let the other, neutral > editors lose interest, and then
	edit those articles [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] New wave of provocations
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5502378806077071914=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 1.6
X-Spam_score_int: 16
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:52, Piotr Konieczny
	<piokon@post.pl> wrote: > One more idea: > * wait a few days, let them
	think they won, let the other, neutral > editors lose interest, and then
	edit those articles [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (1.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-0.2 BAYES_40               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40%
	[score: 0.2098]
	0.4 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

--===============5502378806077071914==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c599f6a68dbb046bbde0f9

--001636c599f6a68dbb046bbde0f9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:52, Piotr Konieczny <piokon@post.pl> wrote:

> One more idea:
> * wait a few days, let them think they won, let the other, neutral
> editors lose interest, and then edit those articles


Right.  Consider that it's currently summer, and not many Red Army
anniversaries in the near future.  Right now, the Cartel bandwagon is
running, but if it splits up, re-organisation will be harder for the Cartel.

-- 
Andres Soolo

--001636c599f6a68dbb046bbde0f9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:52, Piotr Konieczny <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;piokon@post.pl&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">One more idea:<br></div>
* wait a few days, let them think they won, let the other, neutral<br>
editors lose interest, and then edit those articles</blockquote><div><br></=
div><div>Right. =C2=A0Consider that it&#39;s currently summer, and not many=
 Red Army anniversaries in the near future. =C2=A0Right now, the Cartel ban=
dwagon is running, but if it splits up, re-organisation will be harder for =
the Cartel.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>Andres Soolo<br>

--001636c599f6a68dbb046bbde0f9--


--===============5502378806077071914==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

--===============5502378806077071914==--


