X-From_: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net Sun May  3 00:26:54 2009
Return-Path: <folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <929ed1ec0905021258w75f05336mbe679fc55b17e1d7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <278679.88860.qm@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<929ed1ec0905021258w75f05336mbe679fc55b17e1d7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:26:40 +1000
Message-ID: <4f045a880905021526u5754920bn2611d046157c9c29@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin <martint20@gmail.com>
To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
	running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 18:07, Christian
	Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com> > wrote: >> >> Nominated for deletion
	by Offliner, first vote by Krohn 14 minutes later! > > And obviously
	trying to lay down a "Offliner can't be PK because they > disagree"
	defence. This, in itself, is suspicious. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 
	pakkun.mirky.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Subject: Re: [WPM] Russian influence operations in Estonia
X-BeenThere: folks@wikipedometer.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Wikipedia statistics <folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Id: Wikipedia statistics <folks.wikipedometer.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:folks@wikipedometer.net>
List-Help: <mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks>,
	<mailto:folks-request@wikipedometer.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
Errors-To: folks-bounces@wikipedometer.net
X-Spam_score: 0.9
X-Spam_score_int: 9
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "pakkun.mirky.net", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Digwuren
	<digwuren@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 18:07, Christian
	Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com> > wrote: >> >> Nominated for deletion
	by Offliner, first vote by Krohn 14 minutes later! > > And obviously
	trying to lay down a "Offliner can't be PK because they > disagree"
	defence. This, in itself, is suspicious. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (0.9 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-0.7 BAYES_20               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20%
	[score: 0.1590]
	1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
	postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
	-0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Digwuren <digwuren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 18:07, Christian Suciu <christiansuciu@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Nominated for deletion by Offliner, first vote by Krohn 14 minutes later!
>
> And obviously trying to lay down a "Offliner can't be PK because they
> disagree" defence. =A0This, in itself, is suspicious.

Russavia is probably conflicted now on which way to vote. No doubt he
will wait until one of us votes and then will vote the opposite way.
So I'm going to hold off voting for the moment, should be
entertaining.

Martin

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia statistics discussion list
folks@wikipedometer.net
http://wikipedometer.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/folks

