The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2933
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14
2012-09-16
2012-09-17
2012-09-18
2012-09-19
2012-09-21
2012-09-22
2012-09-25
2012-09-27
2012-09-28
2012-09-29
2012-09-30

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Re: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade

Released on 2012-08-22 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1689181
Date | 1970-01-01 01:00:00
From | marko.papic@stratfor.com
To | analysts@stratfor.com

It's still metaphysical intelligence...
Also, looks to me like they want ATF more deeply involved... how to we
process that?
----- Original Message -----
From: "scott stewart" <scott.stewart@stratfor.com>
To: "Analyst List" <analysts@stratfor.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2009 4:31:53 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: RE: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
The Mexicans certainly do have the capability to trace the guns that are
sold through UCAM.
And they may be messed up, but they know the US does not make RPG 7
rockets or South Korean frag grenades.
AK varients imported to the US for sale also bear distinctive markings and
features.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com]
On Behalf Of Marko Papic
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:46 PM
To: Analyst List
Subject: Re: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
Also, another logical problem with the argument of Mexico planting guns to
the U.S. is that that would mean that they have some ability to trace the
serial numbers first themselves. But they obviously don't have that
capacity.
Although, they could do it by make... Sort of like send the U.S. just the
AR-15s, since obviously those are manufactured in the U.S. To tell you the
truth, all of that sounds pretty organized for a fucked up place like
Mexico.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marko Papic" <marko.papic@stratfor.com>
To: "Analyst List" <analysts@stratfor.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2009 3:42:55 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
These are all good points...
But the story itself is a strange choice to include to back up your
argument... Fromt he story itself:
But the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which handles
the U.S. investigations, is at the mercy of local Mexican police for the
amount and quality of the information.
"Many of these rural municipalities that may come into a gun seizure ...
may not even know anything about tracing guns," ATF spokesman Thomas
Mangan said.
That is almost verbatim what MX1 is saying. No?
----- Original Message -----
From: "scott stewart" <scott.stewart@stratfor.com>
To: "Analyst List" <analysts@stratfor.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2009 3:25:47 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: RE: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
But I simply don't buy the logic that the Mexicans are too inept to pull
the serial numbers off of recovered guns. ATF has been in the country
since the 1980's and has conducted hundreds of classes on identification,
plus the Mexican military has weapons specialists in dedicated weapons
storage facilities that are fully capable of copying down serial numbers:
http://abcnews.go.com/International/WireStory?id=7518874&page=1
The fact that the Mexican government is only turning over 7200 serial
numbers a year to the US for tracing is incredible -- and very meaningful
to a curious analyst.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com]
On Behalf Of Marko Papic
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:16 PM
To: Analyst List
Subject: Re: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
Definitely... plus if you could seal the border forever... and stop the
flow of guns (magically), there are still guns that are in mexico.
That is why ATF needs to be INSIDE there... which is what MX1 was saying.
----- Original Message -----
From: "scott stewart" <scott.stewart@stratfor.com>
To: "Analyst List" <analysts@stratfor.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2009 3:13:21 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: RE: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
Look back at this piece.
http://www.stratfor.com/tracing_mexicos_guns
There are certain classes of weapons that the cartels obtain from the U.S.
but certain other classes that they do not.
In recent years we are seeing the cartel enforcer groups move more toward
what I call the class 3 weapons - assault rifles, grenades and RPGs -- as
the cartel wars have heated up.
Even if they U.S. border were hermitically sealed this afternoon, the
cartels would still be able to get guns.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com]
On Behalf Of Marko Papic
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:03 PM
To: Analyst List
Subject: Re: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
Also, note that this is not all about price. Price only matters in a free
market ceteris paribus theoretical. I can't think of something that is
more not governed by free market than gun sales. I don't doubt that heavy
weapons and grenades do not come from the U.S. That is just Mex gov't
propaganda. But why on earth would all the other stuff come from anywhere
else, regardless of the price, when you can cross the border and buy it in
the U.S.
Also, are you factoring transportation and cost of security for weapons
shipped from China or Asia? You can't just look at face value price when
you need to factor a number of other actors. It just seems ludicrous to me
that the cartels would get light arms from anywhere else.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marko Papic" <marko.papic@stratfor.com>
To: "Analyst List" <analysts@stratfor.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2009 2:59:44 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
That's good... definitely a link to add to it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "scott stewart" <scott.stewart@stratfor.com>
To: "Analyst List" <analysts@stratfor.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2009 2:57:39 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: RE: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
You know, a really good way to prove this theory would be to show that
there is gun flow from Mexico INTO the U.S. That would prove your
assertion about market dynamics which I am not necessarily sold on.
Here you go. We have a documented flow of grenades into the US from MX.
http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/20090210_mexico_u_s_new_weapon_cartel_arsenal
Guns are still more expensive in MX than in the US but there are other
places where they are cheaper than either the US or MX.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com]
On Behalf Of Marko Papic
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 3:50 PM
To: Analyst List
Subject: Re: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
----- Original Message -----
From: "scott stewart" <scott.stewart@stratfor.com>
To: "Analyst List" <analysts@stratfor.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2009 2:07:05 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: S-weekly for Comment Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
I didn't intend to get so deeply into the economic end of things when I
began writing (this was supposed to be essentially a primer on how
international arms markets work) but when I began to think about the
current gun and ammo shortages in the U.S. I kind of had an epiphany...
(I've been trying to buy a block of .22 rounds for weeks now. The guy
at Wal-mart told me he got a shipment of .22s in last week and they sold
out in 3 hours.) This also has to have an impact on the cartels.
Mexico: Economics and the Arms Trade
On June 26, the small town of Apaseo el Alto, Guanajuato state, Mexico,
was the scene of a [link
http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/20090629_mexico_security_memo_june_29_2009
] brief but deadly firefight between members of Los Zetas and federal and
local security forces. The engagement began when a joint patrol of
Mexican soldiers and law enforcement officers responded to a report of
heavily armed men at a suspected drug safe-house. When the patrol arrived,
a 20 minute firefight erupted between the security forces and gunmen in
the house, as well as several suspects in two vehicles that threw
fragmentation grenades as they attempted to escape.
When the shooting stopped, twelve gunmen were dead and twelve had been
taken into custody, while several soldiers and police were reported
wounded. At least half the detained suspects admitted to being members of
Los Zetas.
When authorities examined the house they discovered a pit that contained
the remains of an undetermined number of people (perhaps 14 or 15) who are
believed to have been executed and then burned beyond recognition by Los
Zetas. The house also contained a large cache of weapons, including
assault rifles and fragmentation grenades. Such [link
http://www.stratfor.com/mexico_coming_fight_control_matamoros ] military
ordnance is frequently used by Los Zetas and the enforcers who work for
their rival cartels.
STRATFOR has been [link
http://www.stratfor.com/theme/tracking_mexicos_drug_cartels ] closely
following the cartel violence in Mexico for several years now, and
certainly the events that transpired in Apaseo el Alto are by no means
unique. It is not uncommon for the Mexican authorities to engage in large
firefights with cartel groups, encounter mass graves or [link
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids ]
recover large caches of arms. The recovery of these weapons does,
however, provide an opportunity to once again focus on the dynamics of
Mexicoa**s arms trade.
White Black and Shades of Gray
Before we get down in the weeds in Mexicoa**s arms flow, leta**s do
something just a little different and first take a brief look at how arms
trafficking works on a larger global and regional scale. Doing so will
help better illustrate how the arms trafficking in Mexico fits into
these broader patterns.
When analysts examine arms sales they look at three general categories,
the white arms, market, the gray arms market and the black arms market.
The white arms market is the totally legal, above board transfer of
weapons in accordance with the national laws of the parties involved and
international treaties or restrictions. The parties in a white arms deal
will file the proper paperwork to include end-user certificates noting
what is being sold who is selling it and who it is going to. There is an
understanding that the receiving party does not intend to transfer the
weapons to a third party. So for example, if the Mexican Army wants to buy
an order of assault rifles from German arms maker Heckler and Koch, it
places the order with the company and fills out all the required
paperwork, to include getting permission for the sale from the German
government.
Now, the white arms market can be deceived and manipulated, and when this
happens, we get the gray market a** literally white arms that are shifted
into the hands of someone other than the purported recipient. On of the
classic ways to do this is to either falsify an end user certificate or to
bribe an official in a third country to sign an end user certificate but
then allow a shipment of arms to pass through a country en route to a
third location. This type of transaction is frequently used in cases where
there are international arms embargoes against a particular country (like
Liberia) or where it is illegal to sell arms to a militant group (such as
the FARC.) On example of this would be Ukrainian small arms that were on
paper supposed to go to CA'te d'Ivoire, but that were really transferred
in violation of UN arms embargoes to Liberia and Sierra Leone. Another
example of this would be the government of Peru ostensibly purchasing
thousands of surplus East German assault rifles from Jordan on the white
arms market but then those rifles slipped into the gray arms world when
they were dropped at airstrips in the jungles of Colombia for use by the
FARC instead of being delivered to the Peruvian military.
At the far end of the spectrum is the black arms market where the guns are
contraband from the get go and all the business is conducted under the
board. There are no end user certificates and the weapons are smuggled
covertly. Examples of this would be the smuggling of arms from the Former
Soviet Union (FSU) and Afghanistan into Europe through places like Kosovo
and Slovenia, or the smuggling of arms into South America from Asia, the
FSU and Middle East by Hezbollah and criminal gangs in the Tri-Border
Region.
Nation states will often use the gray and black arms markets in order to
support allies, undermine opponents or otherwise pursue their national
interests. This was clearly revealed in the Iran-Contra scandal of the mid
1980a**s but Iran-Contra only scratched the surface of the arms smuggling
that occurred during the Cold War. Untold tons of military ordnance was
delivered by the U.S. and the Soviet Union and Cuba to their respective
allies in Latin America during the Cold War.
This quantity of materiel shipped into Latin America during the Cold War
brings up another very important point pertaining to weapons. Unlike
drugs, which are consumable goods, firearms are durable goods. This means
that they can be useful for decades and are frequently shipped from
conflict zone to conflict zone. East German MPiKMS and MPiKM assault
rifles are still floating around the worlda**s arms markets years after
the German Democratic Republic ceased to exist. In fact, visiting an arms
bazaar in a place like Yemen is like visiting an arms museum. One can
encounter functional century-old Lee-Enfield and Springfield rifles in a
rack next to a modern U.S. M-4 rifle or a German HK 93, and those next to
brand-new, just out of the box, Chinese Type 56 and 81 assault rifles.
There is often a correlation between arms and drug smuggling. In many
instances the same routes used to smuggle drugs are also used to smuggle
arms. In some instances, like the smuggling routes from Central Asia to
Europe, the flow of guns and drugs flows in the same direction, and they
are both sold in Western Europe for cash. In the case of Latin American
cocaine, the drugs tend to flow in one direction (towards the U.S. and
Europe) while guns from the U.S. and Russian organized crime groups flow
in the other direction, and often times the guns are used as whole or
partial payment for the drugs.
Illegal drugs are not the only thing traded for guns. During the Cold War
there was a robust arms-for-sugar trade going on between the Cubans and
Vietnamese. As a result, Marxist groups all over Latin America were
furnished with U.S. materiel either captured or left behind when the
Americans withdrew from the country. LAW rockets traced to U.S. military
stocks sent to Vietnam were used in several attacks by Latin American
Marxist groups. These Vietnam-war vintage weapons still crop up with some
frequency in Mexico, Colombia and other parts of the region. Cold-war era
weapons furnished to the likes of the Contras, the Sandinistas, the FMLN
and URNG in the 1980a**s are also frequently encountered in the region.
After the civil wars ended in places like El Salvador and Guatemala, the
governments and international community attempted to institute arms
by-back programs, but those programs were not very successful and most of
the guns turned in were very old a** the better arms were cached by groups
or kept by individuals. These guns have found their way in dribs and
drabs back onto the black arms market
Well Over 90%
For several years now, Mexican officials have been telling STRATFOR that
[link http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/mexico_dynamics_gun_trade ] 90
percent of the arms used by criminals in Mexico come from the U.S. Last
month, that number was echoed in a report by the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) report on U.S. efforts to Conbat Arms
Trafficking to Mexico (see external link).
External link http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09709.pdf
The GAO report stated that in 2008, some 30,000 firearms were seized from
criminals by Mexican officials. Out of these 30,000 firearms, information
pertaining to 7,200 of the, (24 percent) was submitted to ATF for tracing.
Of these 7,200 guns, only approximately 4,000 could be traced and of these
4,000, some 3,480 or 87 percent, were shown to have come from the U.S.
This means that the 87 percent number comes from the number of weapons
submitted by the Mexican government to ATF that could be successfully
traced, and not from the total number of weapons seized by the Mexicans or
even from the total number of weapons submitted to ATF for tracing. The
3,480 guns positively traced to the U.S. only equals less than 12 percent
of the total arms seized in 2008 and less than 48 percent of those
submitted to the ATF for tracing by the Mexican government.
From our contact we have information for why this is so... He has before
told us that Mexican authorities are incapable of properly tracing serial
numbers and that often ATF uses numbers gathered in the open source. Many
of these numbers are not serial numbers at all... instead they are model
numbers or something else.
Contact was adamant that the only way this could work is if the ATF had an
actual presence in Mexico itself.
The 87 percent number is not supported by the evidence presented by the
GAO. In a response to the GAO report that was published as part of the
report, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security called the GAOa**s use of
the 87 percent statistic a**misleadinga**. DHS further noted that
a**Numerous problems with the data collection and sample population render
this assertion as unreliable.a** Yes, this is most definitely corroborated
by our Mexican contact.
Interestingly, when STRATFOR asked a Mexican government official about the
report in an attempt to get an honest read on the scope of the problem of
U.S. firearms going to Mexico, the official told us (off the record) that
the amount of ordnance (guns, grenades, ammunition, etc.) seized by the
Mexican government that come from the U.S. is a**way over 90 percent.a**
With the 87 percent number being dubious, the a**way over 90 percenta**
claim is really very hard to swallow.
Now at STRATFOR, we really dislike it when people attempt to feed us
disinformation in an attempt to get us to report it to further some
agenda. Of course such efforts quickly lead us to consider exactly what
that agenda is, and frequently examining the motives of such people who
provides us with more interesting intelligence than the initial report
itself. In this case it is clear that the motive of the Mexican government
is simple deflection.
It is not just deflection. Mexico is trying to establish the concept of
"shared responsibility". That has been a key phrase that we have heard
from U.S. officials themselves and from our contact as well. I personally
think they are angling to get U.S. to feel sorry for them...
The Mexicans have been criticized by the U.S. for decades over their
inability to stop the flow of narcotics through their territory. Instead
of addressing the hard problem and stopping the flow of narcotics, they
have instead attempted to deflect criticism by blaming the guns proceeding
from the U.S. for their inability to stop the flow of drugs. This is
strange because Mexico has been arguing against U.S. arms flow for
years... this is not something that is new. Sounds a bit like you're
griping too...
We strongly suspect that there is a program underway to cherry pick the
guns provided to the ATF for tracing and that only those guns that are
likely to be traced back to the U.S. are provided for tracing. Sounds like
metaphysical intelligence to me... are you sure your sources on the U.S.
side are not doing the same thing our Mexican soruces are?
We strongly doubt the Mexicans are providing ATF information from the
RPG-7 rocket launchers, South Korean hand grenades, Israeli, South African
Belgian, German, Chinese and other foreign weapons that likely have no
connection to the U.S. In this way they Mexicans are able to spin the
arms tracing figures in their favor, which provides them with a ready
response whenever the U.S. criticizes Mexican counternarcotics efforts.
Again, unless you have evidence of this... we are doing metaphysical
intelligence. Our Mexican contact has said repeatedly that without ATF
presence in Mexico, there is going to be no proper intelligence on serial
numbers. He has said in a conversation two days ago that Mexico is hoping
to have something in place where ATF is present in Mexico. It was in an
insight that you commented on that he was smoking crack.
Again, from the contact:
The only really effective way to clamp down on trafficking in arms is to
institutionalize physical access by ATF agents to Mexico, so they can take
pictures, and run traces from there. There are many dangers to this, but
it is something that is being worked on, and which I expect to see
completed within the next 12 months, at least de jure.
Reality
Arms, like drugs are a commodity, and as such, the economic laws of supply
and demand play a big part in global arms trafficking. Ordnance flows from
places where it is cheap and available to places where it is not. Because
of this, the a**well over 90 percenta** argument does not make a whole lot
of economic sense. Wait why? Logically it makes sense that it would flow
from U.S.... at least the small arms (certainly not the heavy stuff that
they get from corrupt Mexican cops and army). I mean you cross the border,
go to a gun show and you get a gun... IT's simple.
Firstly, it must be recognized that while arms sales are restricted in
Mexico, they do occur and people are able to buy weapons from the
government. In fact guns in calibers that are very popular in Mexico but
fairly uncommon in the U.S. (like the .38 Super) are commonly used by
criminals. Yup... corroberated by contact.
Secondly at the present time assault rifles are very expensive in the
United States, as is ammunition. In fact, it is difficult to locate many
types of assault rifles and ammunition at the present time, though a lucky
buyer might be able to find a basic stripped down AR-15 for between $850
and $1100, or and an AK-47 for between $650 and $850. Obviously, a gun
purchased in the U.S., smuggled into Mexico and sold to a cartel is going
to carry a premium well above this purchase price. Sure, but you just have
to cross the border to get it. Also, this does not preclude gun sales
prior to price inflation. Now, by way of comparison, a surplus assault
rifle can be purchased for under $100 on the white arms market, and about
the same on the black arms market in locations where weapons are abundant.
That difference in price provides a powerful economic incentive to buy low
elsewhere and sell high in Mexico. Indeed, we have seen reports of
international arms merchants from places like Israel and Belgium, selling
weapons to the cartels, and that ordnance is coming into Mexico through
routes other than over the U.S. border.
You know, a really good way to prove this theory would be to show that
there is gun flow from Mexico INTO the U.S. That would prove your
assertion about market dynamics which I am not necessarily sold on.
At the same time as gun and ammunition prices have spiked in the U.S. the
profits of the Mexican cartels have plummeted due to increased enforcement
efforts and inter- and intra- cartel wars. Many of the cartels are
hurting for money and have had to resort to kidnapping and other crime in
order to finance their operations. That means that they will be attempting
to purchase maximum firepower for the minimum price.
The Bottom Line
STRATFOR believes that the issue of U.S. guns being sent south of the
border is a serious issue, but we do not believe that U.S. weapons
represent any where near 90 percent of the cartelsa** weaponry a**
especially their military-style weapons like fully automatic assault
rifles, fragmentation grenades and RPGa**s, where the percentage of U.S.
ordnance is negligible. Yeah, I think that is true as well... definitely
not the heavy serious stuff. The cartels clearly have contacts with arms
dealers outside of the U.S. both those who deal in cold war-era stocks of
arms in Latin America and international arms merchants who can supply arms
from around the world.
While increased U.S. enforcement efforts will have an impact as the risk
of being caught outweighs the profit that can be made by selling guns to
the cartels, we believe that economics (high gun prices and scarce
ammunition supplies you are overemphesizing this... this is a current
issue that has nothing to do with last 3-4 years of arms sales though. )
may play an equally important part in reducing the flow of U.S. guns to
Mexico IN THE FUTURE (or at least while Obama is the President). The laws
of supply and demand will ensure that the Mexican cartels get their
ordnance in the most price effective way, and with the current gun and
ammunition supply issues in the U.S. that will likely mean that an even
greater amount of that supply will come from outside the U.S. via the gray
and black arms markets.
Scott Stewart
STRATFOR
Office: 814 967 4046
Cell: 814 573 8297
scott.stewart@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com