The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2933
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14
2012-09-16
2012-09-17
2012-09-18
2012-09-19
2012-09-21
2012-09-22
2012-09-25
2012-09-27
2012-09-28
2012-09-29
2012-09-30

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## RE: Obama transcript on terrorism---buck stops with ME

Released on 2012-08-21 01:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1100541
Date | 2010-01-08 00:35:26
From | burton@stratfor.com
To | analysts@stratfor.com
List-Name | analysts@stratfor.com

One other point.
Threat investigation is an art, but there is no single govt agency
responsible. It depends upon the nature of the threat. So, the many cooks
in the kitchen have to figure out who takes the lead in DC, but the
originator of the threat reporting can run with the ball and direct his
agent colleagues to take action in other posts. This was a very routine
matter done 5-6 times a day, back on my watch. The inability to know who
has the lead, provides the vacuum to be filled by those taking action in the
field.
For example, here are the various threats and the lead agencies to
investigate:
POTUS, VPOTUS - USSS
SecState, Embassies - State/DSS
Nuclear - FBI, CIA, DOE
US Homeland - FBI, DHS
Aviation - FBI, TSA, FAA
Clear as mudd, ain't it?
Which is why WE would take the lead on every terror threat and run with the
ball back in the day.
-----Original Message-----
From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com]
On Behalf Of Sean Noonan
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 4:34 PM
To: Analyst List
Subject: Obama transcript on terrorism---buck stops with ME
Transcript: Obama outlines steps to prevent terrorism January 7, 2010 --
Updated 2229 GMT (0629 HKT) President Obama says the United States "will not
succumb to a siege mentality that sacrifices the open society."
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/07/transcript.obama.terror.report/in
dex.html?iref=24hours
Washington (CNN) -- President Obama on Thursday discussed the results of the
reviews he requested after the botched Christmas terrorist attack.
Here is a transcript of his speech.
Obama: Good afternoon, everybody.
The immediate reviews that I ordered after the failed Christmas terrorist
attack are now complete. I was just briefed on the findings and
recommendations for reform, and I believe it's important that the American
people understand the new steps that we're taking to prevent attacks and
keep our country safe.
This afternoon my counterterrorism and homeland security adviser, John
Brennan, will discuss his review into our terrorist watch list system, how
our government failed to connect the dots in a way that would have prevented
a known terrorist from boarding a plane for America, and the steps we're
going to take to prevent that from happening again.
Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano will discuss her review of
aviation screening, technology and procedures, how that terrorist boarded a
plane with explosives that could have killed nearly 300 innocent people, and
how we'll strengthen aviation security going forward.
So today I want to just briefly summarize their conclusions and the steps
that I've ordered to address them.
In our ever-changing world, America's first line of defense is timely,
accurate intelligence that is shared, integrated, analyzed and acted upon
quickly and effectively. That's what the intelligence reforms after the 9/11
attacks largely achieved. That's what our intelligence community does every
day.
But, unfortunately, that's not what happened in the lead-up to Christmas
Day. It's now clear that shortcomings occurred in three broad and
compounding ways.
First, although our intelligence community had learned a great deal about
the al Qaeda affiliate in Yemen, called al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula,
that we knew that they sought to strike the United States and that they were
recruiting operatives to do so, the intelligence community did not
aggressively follow up on and prioritize particular streams of intelligence
related to a possible attack against the homeland.
Second, this contributed to a larger failure of analysis, a failure to
connect the dots of intelligence that existed across our intelligence
community and which together could have revealed that [Umar Farouk]
AbdulMutallab was planning an attack.
Third, this in turn fed into shortcomings in the watch-listing system which
resulted in this person not being placed on the no-fly list, thereby
allowing him to board that plane in Amsterdam for Detroit.
In sum, the U.S. government had the information scattered throughout the
system to potentially uncover this plot and disrupt the attack. Rather than
a failure to collect or share intelligence, this was a failure to connect
and understand the intelligence that we already had.
Now, that's why we took swift action in the immediate days following
Christmas, including reviewing and updating the terrorist watch list system
and adding more individuals to the no-fly list, and directing our embassies
and consulates to include current visa information in their warnings of
individuals with terrorist or suspected terrorist ties.
Today, I'm directing a series of additional corrective steps across multiple
agencies. Broadly speaking, they fall into four areas.
First, I'm directing that our intelligence community immediately begin
assigning specific responsibility for investigating all leads on
high-priority threats so that these leads are pursued and acted upon
aggressively not just most of the time, but all of the time.
We must follow the leads that we get, and we must pursue them until plots
are disrupted. And that means assigning clear lines of responsibility.
Second, I'm directing that intelligence reports, especially those involving
potential threats to the United States, be distributed more rapidly and more
widely. We can't sit on information that could protect the American people.
Third, I'm directing that we strengthen the analytical process, how our
analysis -- how our analysts process and integrate the intelligence that
they receive.
My director of national intelligence, Denny Blair, will take the lead in
improving our day-to-day efforts. My Intelligence Advisory Board will
examine the longer term challenge of sifting through vast universes of
-- of intelligence and data in our information age.
And, finally, I'm ordering an immediate effort to strengthen the criteria
used to add individuals to our terrorist watch lists, especially the no-fly
list. We must do better in keeping dangerous people off airplanes, while
still facilitating air travel.
So taken together, these reforms will improve the intelligence community's
ability to collect, share, integrate, analyze and act on intelligence
swiftly and effectively.
In short, they will help our intelligence community do its job even better
and protect American lives.
But even the best intelligence can't identify in advance every individual
who would do us harm.
So we need the security at our airports, ports, and borders and through our
partnerships with other nations to prevent terrorists from entering America.
At the Amsterdam airport, AbdulMutallab was subjected to the same screening
as other passengers. He was required to show his documents, including a
valid U.S. visa. His carry-on bag was X-rayed. He passed through a metal
detector.
But a metal detector can't detect the kind of explosives that were sewn into
his clothes. As Secretary Napolitano will explain, the screening
technologies that might have detected these explosives are in use at the
Amsterdam airport but not at the specific checkpoints that he passed
through.
Indeed, most airports in the world and in the United States do not yet have
these technologies.
Now, there's no silver bullet to securing the thousands of flights into
America each day, domestic and international. It will require significant
investments in many areas. And that's why, even before the Christmas attack,
we increased investments in homeland security and aviation security.
This includes an additional $1 billion in new systems and technologies that
we need to protect our airports, more baggage screening, more passenger
screening, and more advanced explosive detection capabilities, including
those that can improve our ability to detect the kind of explosive used on
Christmas.
These are major investments, and they'll make our skies safer and more
secure.
Now, as I announced this week, we've taken a whole range of steps to improve
aviation screening and security since Christmas, including new rules for how
we handle visas within the government and enhanced screening for passengers
flying from or through certain countries.
And today, I am directing that the Department of Homeland Security take
additional steps, including strengthening our international partnerships to
improve aviation screening and security around the world, greater use of the
advanced explosive detection technologies that we already have, including
imaging technology, and working aggressively in cooperation with the
Department of Energy and our national labs to develop and deploy the next
generation of screening technologies.
Now, there is, of course, no foolproof solution. As we develop new screening
technologies and procedures, our adversaries will seek new ways to evade
them, as was shown by the Christmas attack. In the never-ending race to
protect our country, we have to stay one step ahead of a nimble adversary.
That's what these steps are designed to do, and we will continue to work
with Congress to ensure that our intelligence, homeland security, and law
enforcement communities have the resources they need to keep the American
people safe.
I ordered these two immediate reviews so that we could take immediate action
to secure our country. But in the weeks and months ahead, we will continue a
sustained and intensive effort of analysis and assessment so we leave no
stone unturned in seeking better ways to protect the American people.
I have repeatedly made it clear in public with the American people and in
private with my national security team that I will hold my staff, our
agencies and the people in them accountable when they fail to perform their
responsibilities at the highest levels.
Now, at this stage in the review process it appears that this incident was
not the fault of a single individual or organization, but rather a systemic
failure across organizations and agencies.
That's why, in addition to the corrective efforts that I've ordered, I've
directed agency heads to establish internal accountability reviews and
directed my national security staff to monitor their efforts.
We will measure progress, and John Brennan will report back to me within 30
days and on a regular basis after that.
All of these agencies and their leaders are responsible for implementing
these reforms, and all will be held accountable if they don't.
Moreover, I am less interested in passing out blame than I am in learning
from and correcting these mistakes to make us safer, for ultimately the buck
stops with me. As president, I have a solemn responsibility to protect our
nation and our people, and when the system fails, it is my responsibility.
Over the past two weeks, we've been reminded again of the challenge we face
in protecting our country against a foe that is bent on our destruction. And
while passions and politics can often obscure the hard work before us, let's
be clear about what this moment demands.
We are at war. We are at war against al Qaeda, a far-reaching network of
violence and hatred that attacked us on 9/11, that killed nearly 3,000
innocent people, and that is plotting to strike us again. And we will do
whatever it takes to defeat them.
And we've made progress. Al Qaeda's leadership is hunkered down. We have
worked closely with partners, including Yemen, to inflict major blows
against al Qaeda leaders. And we have disrupted plots at home and abroad and
saved American lives.
And we know that the vast majority of Muslims reject al Qaeda. But it is
clear that al Qaeda increasingly seeks to recruit individuals without known
terrorist affiliations, not just in the Middle East but in Africa and other
places, to do their bidding.
That's why I've directed my national security team to develop a strategy
that addresses the unique challenges posed by lone recruits. And that's why
we must communicate clearly to Muslims around the world that al Qaeda offers
nothing except a bankrupt vision of misery and death, including the murder
of fellow Muslims, while the United States stands with those who seek
justice and progress.
To advance that progress we've sought new beginnings with Muslim communities
around the world, one in which we engage on the basis of mutual interest and
mutual respect and work together to fulfill the aspirations that all people
share -- to get an education, to work with dignity, to live in peace and
security.
That's what America believes in. That's the vision that is far more powerful
than the hatred of these violent extremists.
Here at home, we will strengthen our defenses, but we will not succumb to a
siege mentality that sacrifices the open society and liberties and values
that we cherish as Americans, because great and proud nations don't hunker
down and hide behind walls of suspicion and mistrust. That is exactly what
our adversaries want. And so long as I am president, we will never hand them
that victory.
We will define the character of our country, not some band of small men
intent on killing innocent men, women and children.
And in this cause, every one of us -- every American, every elected official
-- can do our part. Instead of giving in to cynicism and division, let's
move forward with the confidence and optimism and unity that defines us as a
people, for now is not a time for partisanship, it's a time for citizenship,
a time to come together and work together with the seriousness of purpose
that our national security demands.
That's what it means to be strong in the face of violent extremism.
That's how we will prevail in this fight. And that's how we will protect our
country and pass it, safer and stronger, to the next generation.
Thanks very much.
--
Sean Noonan
Research Intern
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com