The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2921
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14
2012-09-16
2012-09-17
2012-09-18
2012-09-19
2012-09-21
2012-09-22
2012-09-25
2012-09-27
2012-09-28
2012-09-29

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## FOR EDIT- Assange Arrest

Released on 2012-08-15 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1649726
Date | 2010-12-07 16:15:43
From | sean.noonan@stratfor.com
To | analysts@stratfor.com

*thanks to all for the very helpful comments.
Assange Arrest and WikiLeaks Survival
Display: the Douchiest picture of Assange possible.
Summary:
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was arrested in Britain December 7,
following an Interpol Red Notice based on a Swedish warrant. WikiLeaks is
a new organization with one leader that has not institutionalized.
Assange's arrest will test its ability to maintain itself as an
institution, but the concept of leaking documents on the internet will
continue.
Analysis:
London Metropolitan police arrested Julian Assange, the founder and public
spokesman for WikiLeaks, at 0930 GMT December 7 when he turned himself in.
He is due to appear in a court in Westminster soon to face a hearing over
charges against him in Sweden, and possible extradition. There is
considerable interest in what this can mean for his organization. While
it's possible that Assange's arrest could disrupt the long-term viability
of WikiLeaks, it will not stop the release of cables in the short-term and
will not stop similar future leaks via the internet.
Leadership can be extremely important in non-governmental organizations
that have not institutionalized. From <terrorist groups> [LINK:
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20090923_death_top_indonesian_militant] to
charities, new organizations often ebb and flow along with their founders.
WikiLeaks organized a new method for an old practice- leaking
confidential government information in an attempt to influence politics.
Assange created WikiLeaks with himself as the only public face-- he leads
supporters, drives donations, gives interviews and faces criticism. There
have been reports of internal dissent and tensions, and in one interview
with CNN, discussion of the organizations internal politics seemed to
touch a nerve with Assange. If Assange were to face charges in Sweden for
sexual assault or new charges in the UK or US and was found guilty,
WikiLeaks would still need someone to operate it. Assange may have
someone waiting in the wings, but that is not evident.
WikiLeaks has also suffered logistically. As national governments put
pressure on its infrastructure, its websites have been shut down and most
importantly a major source of funding, PayPal, has closed WikiLeaks'
account (Mastercard has also banned payments from its card to WikiLeaks).
It is also not clear whether the events of the last few months will
encourage or deter other potential leakers from approaching Wikileaks as
opposed to other organizations (especially if they dislike or disagree
with Assange. Moreover, this new set of documents have not worked out
like Assange expected- the U.S. public is not angry at the State
Department, but many are angry at Assange and his organization. [LINK:
http://www.stratfor.com/geopolitical_diary/20101206_geopolitics_continue_despite_wikileaks]
Immediately following Assange's arrest, WikiLeaks spokesperson Kristinn
Hrafnsson said that it would not stop the group's operations. Indeed,
whether Assange remains behind bars or not, it most likely will not stop
the continued leaks of this large batch of US State Department cables. It
also will not shut down WikiLeaks, which still maintains its website
(albeit currently on a Swiss server, after its initial site's were
deactivated) and the ability to collect information from leakers. So in
the short-term, WikiLeaks will continue. The question remains if Assange
created a truly sustainable institution-- one where leaders are
replaceable, members can adapt to changing circumstance, and
representatives can aid and inspire new leakers. Will leakers continue to
go to the, or choose other organizations?
If Assange is extradited to Sweden and tried of one count of unlawful
coercion, two counts of sexual molestation and one count of rape, the
question is how much WikiLeaks image will be damaged. He may try to use
prison time- especially before trial- to develop his image as a martyr,
but this can always backfire. If WikiLeaks, however, is not tied to his
image, it will be much more sustainable as an organization.
Western governments also fear whatever is contained in his "insurance"
file, for which he threatens to release an encryption key if something
happens to him. The file was released across the internet and has been
downloaded by countless number of people. What it contains is still
secret, but WikiLeaks may have threatened the US government and others
with clues to its contents. WikiLeaks has likely already released its
most damaging documents in an attempt to get public attention. This new
file then probably does not contain higher-level secret information, but
instead may be full of names. Those names being sources who will be at
risk and those of diplomats, military or intelligence officers who could
lose their jobs or even lives. These people who could be adversely
affected by the release of the insurance file also pose another conundrum
for wikileaks. Exposing them and impacting them in a vindictive manner
could further tarnish Assange and Wikileaks in the eyes of the
international public, to include potential financial and information
contributors.
WikiLeaks is now facing a conundrum that all new organizations do--the
ability to maintain and transition leadership through adverse
circumstances. Maybe Assange will be released quickly-- STRATFOR cannot
speak to the veracity of the charges against him-- but if he isn't,
WikiLeaks survival is brought into question. But even if WikiLeaks
disappears, the organizational concept will still continue, and leaks
along with it. WikiLeaks has only demonstrated the ability new technology
has created to transfer such large quantities of documents, and there is
no reason other organizations will not make use of the same technology.
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com