The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2878
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14
2012-09-16
2012-09-17
2012-09-18
2012-09-19
2012-09-21
2012-09-22
2012-09-25
2012-09-27
2012-09-28

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## AFGHANISTAN/AFRICA/LATAM/EU/MESA - Columnist suggests USA seeking to use Turkey to undermine Syria, Iran - IRAN/US/ISRAEL/TURKEY/AFGHANISTAN/FRANCE/SYRIA/IRAQ/EGYPT/LIBYA/TUNISIA

Released on 2012-08-22 09:00 GMT

Email-ID | 744691
Date | 2011-11-07 19:11:11
From | nobody@stratfor.com
To | translations@stratfor.com
List-Name | translations@stratfor.com

Columnist suggests USA seeking to use Turkey to undermine Syria, Iran
Text of report by Turkish newspaper Star website on 3 November
[Commentary by Sedat Laciner: "Syrian trap to Turkey"]
President Barack Obama's style is quite different from that of his
predecessor. When George W Bush would encounter a problem in a country,
he would attempt to directly invade that country, he would mass tens and
even hundreds of thousands of troops, and he would attempt to change the
borders, the regimes, and the leaders. In the "Bush style" the targeted
country would sustain great damages, but US troops and funds would also
be risked in a similar manner.
The Obama-led Democrats in turn believe that Bush's stand has brought
the United States's to the point of bankruptcy. According to them, both
the globalized economic crisis and the shaking in the social balances in
the United States are the results of the Iraq and Afghanistan
adventures. Drawing the necessary lessons from bad examples, the
Democrats engaged in a very different method in Libya, Egypt, and
Tunisia. It is possible to list the lessons that have been drawn as
follows:
1. They did not get directly involved in the clashes in Libya, they did
not take place in the first ranks.
2. They encouraged other eager countries such as France to share the
costs.
3. They ensured the involvement of NATO and the United Nations and this
way, they ensured that the intervention would not merely be a US
intervention.
4. They received the support of the Arab World and Turkey and this way,
they have stopped the regional reactions from the very beginning.
5. Most important, Muammar al-Qadhafi was overcome by the Libyans. In
other words, they had Libyans kill Libyans. The dissidents were given
arms and armed training. Certain intelligence units determined all the
shortfalls of al-Qadhafi and his men and they shared this information
with the dissidents. Similar developments also occurred and continue to
occur in Egypt, Syria, and other Arab countries.
Obama is more dangerous
The "Obama style" was greeted with applause in Turkey and the entire
world. For example, despite the fact that the administration in Libya
has undergone change in line with the wishes of the United States, as
opposed to the past, serious anti-American sentiments have not been
encountered in the streets of Turkey. I also accept that when compared
with Bush's style the new approach has many positive sides. However I
believe that this new method, which can also be described as "picking up
the flame with a pair of tongs," carries more fatal risks than the Bush
era for Turkey. This is because in the new method the targeted country
and its neighbours are charged to pay all the cost.
When you look in this context, you will see that if Iran and Syria are
the countries in line, bloody civil wars await these countries.
Similarly if the United States which is getting ready to withdraw from
Iraq encounters serious problems in Iraq, as opposed to the past it will
have regional forces clash with each other, rather than dispatching
soldiers to Iraq. Under such circumstances Turkey will sustain the
greatest damage.
Tender to Turkey?
The latest developments especially regarding Syria are enough to
increase the concerns on this issue. The US and the Israeli press
insistently try to portray Turkey as the supporter and the leader of the
armed opposition in Syria. Unfortunately, from time to time Turkey is
unknowingly giving material to those who do not have good intentions on
this issue in any way whatsoever. I had drawn attention to this issue in
this column months ago and I had said: "Efforts are being made to kill
two birds with one stone by having Turkey and Syria clash with each
other." More data which increases my fears in this regard is being
exposed. Syrian President Bashar al-Asad is certain that Turkey wants
his head. According to the Allawites Turkey wants to change the regime
in Syria and it openly encourages a civil war. In short, efforts are
being made to assign Turkey the role that the United States used to
assume in the past. There is no doubt that a Syria which thinks in this!
manner extends further support to the PKK. In other words, efforts are
being made to try to implement the Libyan model in Syria by modifying
it. Nonetheless the calculations over Turkey are not merely limited to
Syria. These calculations are also being made in association with Iran.
If Iran is stopped by Turkey, Turkey which will weaken both militarily
and economically will be tamed and a problem such as Iran will be gotten
rid of at a low cost.
As you can see, the calculations are extremely logical on paper in terms
of the West and Israel. Time will show when they will be implemented.
Source: Star website, Istanbul, in Turkish 3 Nov 11
BBC Mon EU1 EuroPol ME1 MEPol 071111 em/osc
(c) Copyright British Broadcasting Corporation 2011