The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2878
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14
2012-09-16
2012-09-17
2012-09-18
2012-09-19
2012-09-21
2012-09-22
2012-09-25
2012-09-27

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Re: [CT] DISCUSSION GERMANY/CT-The Story Behind Germany's Terror Threat

Released on 2012-08-12 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1948061
Date | 2010-11-22 20:01:11
From | jaclyn.blumenfeld@stratfor.com
To | ct@stratfor.com
List-Name | ct@stratfor.com

Here are some of the thoughts and inconsistencies I found - I had
summarized the der spiegel to pick out the bits I found important and
added some info from other OS articles in blue.
-Call from abroad (likely Pakistan) from "Nova" a terrorist wanting to
surrender and return to his family in Germany
-now working with German Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) and was
reason behind threat increase on Wednesday, so far three calls have taken
place between "Nova" and BKA
-warned of small group attacking Reichstag on Monday and security has
since been increased, authorities are secretly monitoring communications,
conducting surveillance operations and launching undercover
investigations.
According to "NOVA":
-AQ and associate groups (Pakistan's Islamic Jihad Group) planning
together in Pakistan for attack(s) in Germany.
-One idea was to remotely detonate a bomb using a mobile phone. Another
called for a small group of terrorists to storm the Reichstag with guns
blazing, take hostages and end everything in one calamitous bloodbath.
-Plan called for the terrorists to procure the submachine guns, automatic
rifles, explosives and whatever else they would need in the Balkans.
-He said that two men had already traveled to Germany six to eight weeks
earlier, adding that one had the nom de guerre of "Abu Mohammed" and that
the other one was a German of Turkish origin
-Both apparently had roots in the Greater Berlin metropolitan area, were
currently unemployed and living off of welfare payments and had immersed
themselves in the anonymity provided by a major city -- until the time
should come for their activation.
-Four others involved were waiting to travel to Germany at training camps
in Pakistan - including a German, a Turk, a North African and another
jihadist of unknown identity
-Attack slated for February or March (if German intel had this knowledge
why would they close the Reichstag today? are they sending a statement to
AQ and affiliate group that they are aware and ahead of the planning?)
According to FBI (which was recieved shortly before the call from "Nova"
(there are some inconsistencies between the intelligence)
- FBI included warnings about the obscure Indian group "Saif" which
although Shiite had allegedly made pact with AQ and sent five men to
Pakistan for training - what the connection to the Germany plot not
specified - the 6 members described in the Reichstag plot were described
by caller as various nationalities - none Indian)
-FBI also shared that two members with visas allowing them to travel
freely in EU schengen zone were already enroute to Germany and would enter
via UAE on Nov 22 (compared to caller saying that two had already entered
two weeks prior - time gap - so maybe there are four now in Germany unless
FBI intel was outdated and the men came earlier - or caller was not
accurate?)
-FBI warnings claim the two in Germany were dispatched by Dawood Ibrahim
Kaskar, an Indian organised crime baron linked to al-Qaeda based out of
Karachi (this seems out of place - two mentions by the FBI of an Indian
connection)
-One of the men is supposedly named "Khan" (versus caller's info he was
named Abu Muhammed and the second guy was of Turkish descent - Khan is not
Turkish, Khan and Abu Muhammed could be the same guy though)
Ben West wrote:
Europeans have still found a way to blame Americans for warnings in the
past.
And yes, something very well could be in the works, but given the fact
that jihadists constantly want to attack the west, is it really at all
significant that something is in the works?
I think we'd seen past plots with travel plans... I'd have to look
harder to get specifics, but I don't think that's all that novel.
Agree that the security officials are in a catch-22 situation.
On 11/22/2010 11:43 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
There is a notable difference here. And that is the German warning
issued last week. It was based on their own intelligence not American
intelligence--so no blaming americans this time. Yes, it's true that
they don't have the capability to attack the Reichstag, and theat the
attack is not imminent, as I pointed out. But on the other hand, like
with cargo parcels, it doesn't mean that something is not in the
works. Have we ever seen information this specific before on the
individuals and their travel plans?
This is the conundrum of warning intelligence, when the warning is
given (just to policymakers, or to the public), measures are taken
that prevent it. It then comes the boy-who-cried-wolf, even if the
warning was originally accurate.
Not to mention, given what happened with the last double agent to
become public (Khost), it will be interesting to follow this one.
On 11/22/10 11:33 AM, Ben West wrote:
I agree that the spiegel article was good - but this is the kind of
thing we've seen over and over again in Europe. Source from
durkastan says that aq is going to target Europe and kill lots of
people and that attackers are en route. Everyone gets freaked out.
Nothing significant happens. Europe blames US of scare mongering.
Certainly islamists have europe in their cross-hairs, but if an
attack is going to happen, it's not going be preceded by this kind
of publicity.
Also, attacking the reichstag? I mean, it's possible to ATTACK it,
but they've got a pretty heavy security presence there that would
prevent a hostage situation. I was there a few years ago. The public
entryway is confined to one doorway with a heavy guard presence,
metal detectors, x-ray machines, etc. If anything, an attack could
kill lots of tourists lined up outside, but it would take a very
serious force to be able to gain entrance to the reichstag and an
even more well trained force to actually hold hostages. This sounds
like a pipe-dream to me.
On 11/22/2010 11:04 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
thoughts?
On 11/22/10 11:00 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
It is up to you and CT how you approach this. On the short-term,
this looks like something you can handle without me. If you want
to dabble in the more long-term view of what is going on here, I
would love to help.
On 11/22/10 10:58 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
In the more long-term, I think an analysis of the German
intelligence agencies would be good too. They have been pretty
decimated by the Cold War and by all the problems associated
with running an intelligence agency in a post-Gestapo country.
If Germany is ever going to become a world power again,
however, they would need to overcome these deamons as well.
That is sort of the last straw for Germany, the one that is
going to be most sensitive to overcome. But perhaps this case
may illustrate how they are already overcoming these issues.
On 11/22/10 10:50 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
Main problem is that Der Spiegel is just that good, they've
at least touched on most of what I would want to say about
it. The main thing here is how the politics of a terror
threat/alert coincide with the reality of the threat
itself.
We saw that Germany was fairly relaxed bout the earlier
threat in Europe released by the US. I'm not sure if that
was the same as the info that the FBI passed over about this
shia group, Saif (I don't know anything about them). But
something changed, as we noted last week in their
interpretation. That seems to go down to this virtual
walk-in. The one thing I was left confused about is whether
BKA had ever been in contact with this source before. It
sounds like he cold called them. It's common knowledge that
walk-ins, rather than recruits, are nearly always the best
sources. But at the same time, they are very suspicious as
double agents. If this was a US source they would be
freaking the fuck out after having Al-Balawi turn on them.
The germans seem to have cooler heads, but they will be
working 24/7 to verify the source (let me make another plug
for John Lecarre's A Most Wanted Man here, most of his
career was in Germany).
They've clearly got enough corroborating information that
they consider this a real threat. But politically they are
faced with the universal 'damned if you do, damned if you
don't' alert problem. If the Interior ministry doesn't say
something, they will be liable if an attack occurs. Look at
the constant press over information on the warning
intelligence for Mumbai. As we've said before, simply
issuing the warning may help to deter the attackers.
The real important bit here, is that it seems the germans
have fairly good intelligence. While this attack is still
not happening tomorrow, they have a lot of details about
what might be in the works, rather than a single-source
intercept that indicates some vague threat. It seems
they've increased security pretty well at the Bundestag, and
want to add to the presence at any possible target. This is
where we seem them scrambling, and where their intelligence
holes are.
The task now for the germans is to verify this source.
Maybe even pick him up and put him on ice somewhere
(Fred/Stick?), not in GErmany but in Pakistan/Afghanistan.
That will require some cooperation with either/both the
Americans and Pakistanis. They also need to verify all the
bio information they have on these 4-6 guys trying to get
into germany and watch travelers very carefully. The
germans seem to be very good at surveilling these threats
within Germany, so their best luck may come when one of the
guys overseas contacts a local already under surveillance.
At minimum, this could be a pretty interesting tearline this
week. Both the walk-in issues and the CIA/FBI liaison
conflicts that I havne't gotten into here.
On 11/22/10 10:34 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
Any thoughts on where you guys are thinking of going with
this?
Der Spiegel article is indeed interesting.
On 11/22/10 9:28 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
Great report from Der Spiegel (thanks Mikey). I suggest
anyone interested to read the whole thing. They ask the
right questions, and while not as much detail as I
hoped, give us a much better understanding on the threat
in Germany.
The BKA (germany's FBI) must be extremely busy verifying
the details of this virtual walk-in. It obviously
caused the germans to shit their pants. But the real
questions are buried in the article---how real was this
plot, how real is the source, is the source just trying
to get back to the land of brezeln and bier? Trying to
double-cross them somehow?
Also note the tip off from the FBI (cue fred), not the
usual CIA liaison with BND.
For Eurasia, there's a lot in here on the internal
politics of the interior minister position, and the
relation between state and federal government.
On 11/22/10 8:55 AM, Michael Wilson wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [OS] GERMANY/CT-The Story Behind Germany's
Terror Threat
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:38:21 -0600
From: Graham Smith <graham.smith@stratfor.com>
Reply-To: The OS List <os@stratfor.com>
To: os@stratfor.com
11/22/2010 11:38 AM
Fears of a Mumbai Redux
The Story Behind Germany's Terror Threat
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,730377,00.html
By Matthias Bartsch, Yassin Musharbash and Holger
Stark
Germany is currently in a state of high alert.
Security officials are warning that they have concrete
information pointing to a possible terror attack on
the federal parliament building in Berlin, a massively
popular tourist attraction. The days of Interior
Minister Thomas de Maiziere's reserved stances in
dealing with such warnings appear to be over.
The call came from abroad, and the man speaking
hurriedly on the other end of the line sounded as if
he feared for his life. He wanted out, he told the
officers of the German Federal Criminal Police Office
(BKA) -- out of the terrorist scene. He wanted to come
back to Germany, back to his family. Then he asked if
German officials could help him.
Right now, they're trying to do just that. The BKA is
pursuing the case under the codename "Nova." The
apparently remorseful man could be an important
possible whistleblower from a dangerous region of the
globe. In fact, he is also the most recent reason why
German Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere put the
entire country in a state of fright on Wednesday.
During a hastily called press conference that day, de
Maiziere stated that Germany faced the threat of
terrorist attacks that might be launched against the
country at some point in November. As he put it,
Germany is "presently dealing with a new situation."
Just two days earlier, the source had called for the
third time in just a short period and provided more
information. He told officials that a small group of
terrorists wanted to conduct a raid on the Reichstag
building in Berlin, which houses the federal
parliament, and that that was only one of the targets
included in their attack plans.
Germany on High Alert
Since then, Germany has been in a state of high alert.
The Reichstag is surrounded with barricades and its
popular cupola tourist attraction temporarily closed
to visitors. Police armed with submachine guns are
patrolling major railway stations and airports. And
vacations have been called off for officials at the
country's security agencies. Wherever they have cause
for doing so, the authorities are secretly monitoring
communications, conducting surveillance operations and
launching undercover investigations. At the moment,
investigators seem to be at a loss; their modus
operandi: "We'll prod the shrubs and see if we can
flush out any birds."
"There is cause for worry, but no cause for hysteria,"
de Maiziere assured his listeners. But while he has
never been much of an agitator, his colleagues at the
state level have described the situation in much more
drastic terms. Uwe Schu:nemann, for example, who has
been the interior minister of the northwestern state
of Lower Saxony since 2003, stated that he had "never
experienced a heightened security situation like this
one." And Berlin Senator for the Interior Ehrhart
Ko:rting, whose position is tantamount to that of a
government minister in the city-state, has already
even gone so far as to call on the inhabitants of the
German capital city to report suspicious-looking
individuals of Arab origin to the police. "If you
suddenly see three somewhat strange-looking men who
are new to your neighborhood, who hide their faces and
who only speak Arabic," Ko:rting said, "you should
report them to the authorities."
Under heightened pressure, officials in Germany's 16
federal states are now checking to see when and where
major events are scheduled to take place this coming
week within their boundaries. And nothing suggested as
a possible target is being discounted, no matter how
unlikely. For example, officials in
Rhineland-Palatinate warned the state's interior
minister, Karl Peter Burch, that there was always a
lot going on at IKEA stores on Saturdays.[WTF]
Serenity, Scaremongering and Strategy
Since last week, German politicians at both the state
and federal levels have once again had to figure out
how they will handle themselves when making warnings
about terrorist attacks. They have had to come up with
a language that can simultaneously convey both an
alert and a sense of calm.
This is no easy task. For one thing, this isn't the
first time this has happened. In September 2009, for
example, right before federal elections were held,
there were concrete threats that resulted in a
heightened security situation. But, in the end,
nothing happened. This time around, people are
wondering whether they are on the precipice of an
emergency or whether these are once again empty
threats.
Still, one thing is certain: For the time being,
Germany has become a different country -- more
nervous, more anxious, more agitated. And Germany's
domestic security policies are being put to the test.
When Interior Minister de Maiziere assumed his office
in October 2009 in conservative Chancellor Angela
Merkel's government, he aimed to cool down the heated
sense of alarm regularly fanned out by his
predecessors. What's more, the man who had served as
Merkel's chief of staff in Chancellery until being
moved to the role of interior minister in her new
government, was given the task of nurturing a more
relaxed relationship between her party, the Christian
Democratic Union (CDU), and its new coalition partner,
the business-friendly Free Democratic Party (FDP). In
particular, it was his job to not draw out the
long-standing conflict over domestic security policies
with the Justice Ministry, which has been led since
the 2009 election by Sabine
Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, a member of the FDP.
Indeed, Merkel feared that the quarrelsome FDP might
try to capitalize on the issue to win over more
voters, so she assigned de Maiziere to prevent that
from happening.
In fact, the plan was to repeat the same strategy that
the CDU and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian
Social Union (CSU), had used when they were in the
so-called "grand coalition" with the center-left
Social Democratic Party, between 2005 and 2009. At the
time, they made a point of undermining the SPD by
championing what had traditionally been the latter
party's issues.
A Game-Changer
But now the game plan has changed. This November will
drastically alter de Maiziere's understanding of his
role in office. If he tries to return things to their
previous state of calm, he's going to have a very
tough time. In fact, it's much more likely that he
will be a completely different interior minister.
For a while now, de Maiziere's softer stance has
prompted opposition by politicians on the right
involved with domestic security issues. But they are
now calling louder than ever for a tougher course to
be followed. Merkel is also adjusting to the new
situation and is reportedly happy with the way de
Maiziere handled himself last week. Likewise, no one
seems to have voiced any criticism last Thursday
evening during a meeting of the Coalition Committee, a
regular gathering of the parties that are part of the
government.
The almost complete lack of protest has a lot to do
with where the alarming information is coming from. In
fact, information regarding the supposedly imminent
attacks has come from two independent sources. Shortly
before receiving the telephone call about the planned
attacks, BKA officials had received a cable from their
American counterparts at the FBI, America's federal
police force, warning of possible attacks.
Still, what truth is there in these "security-related"
pieces of information coming from both domestic and
foreign sources? And, given all the discrepancies in
the warning messages, just how much do they deserve to
be trusted? Indeed, even among security officials
themselves, there is some doubt about how legitimate
these statements are -- and about just how acute the
danger threatening Germany really is.
An Attack Modelled after Mumbai[plot details in this
section]
What the caller reported was undeniably alarming.
According to him, al-Qaida and associated groups based
in Pakistan were making joint preparations for an
attack in Germany. One idea was to remotely detonate a
bomb using a mobile phone. Another called for a small
group of terrorists to storm the Reichstag with guns
blazing, take hostages and end everything in one
calamitous bloodbath. Indeed, BKA officials learned
that the latter plan had been modeled on the storming
of luxury hotels in Mumbai, the Indian capital, almost
exactly two years ago, in a massacre that left 175
people dead.
According to the caller, the plan called for the
terrorists to procure the submachine guns, automatic
rifles, explosives and whatever else they would need
to storm Germany's parliament building in the Balkans.
He said that two men had already traveled to Germany
six to eight weeks earlier, adding that one had the
nom de guerre of "Abu Mohammed" and that the other one
was a German of Turkish origin. Both apparently had
roots in the Greater Berlin metropolitan area, were
currently unemployed and living off of welfare
payments and had immersed themselves in the anonymity
provided by a major city -- until the time should come
for their activation.
Likewise, there were allegedly four other volunteers
-- including a German, a Turk, a North African and
another jihadist of unknown identity -- in the
training camps run by al-Qaida and related groups
waiting for the signal to travel to Germany. And,
according to the telephone source, al-Qaida's plan was
to attack in February or March.
The only question now relates to just how credible the
caller's statements are. He is an insider who joined
up with armed groups several months ago and has earned
a reputation as a fanatic fighter.
But could it be that he is only trying to tell German
officials the juiciest things possible in order to
raise his own market value and thereby prompt them to
extract him from the terror scene? Or could it be that
al-Qaida is even planning a second spectacular coup
like the one in December 2009, when the Americans
allowed a supposedly top-level turncoat onto an
American military base without any sort of pat-down,
who went on to detonate his explosive vest and blow
seven CIA officials to bits?
A Strange Message
A clear picture has yet to emerge. And one reason for
this is also the fact that it was only two weeks ago
that the FBI first decided to share information about
another possible attack with German officials.
In this case, even the way contact was made was
unusual. Under normal circumstances, liaisons from the
CIA station in Germany are the ones to communicate
American warnings to their German counterparts. But,
this time around, it was an apparently particularly
anxious FBI that chose to directly notify the BKA.
The FBI told the Germans about an obscure Indian group
called "Saif," or "sword." Despite being a Shiite
group, it had allegedly made a pact with al-Qaida, a
Sunni organization, and sent five of its men to the
Pakistani province of Waziristan for training.
According to the FBI, two volunteers -- who were
already equipped with visas allowing them to travel
freely within the 25 European countries belonging to
the Schengen zone -- were supposedly already en route
to Germany and would enter the United Arab Emirates on
Monday, Nov. 22. There, they would allegedly be
provided with new travel documents before traveling on
to Germany. One of the men is supposedly named "Khan,"
which is about as common in that part of the world as
"Smith" is in English-speaking countries. And no firm
conclusion had been made about their nationalities.
The FBI agents even named the presumed masterminds
behind the operation. A certain Mushtaq Altaf
Bin-Khadri, who is in charge of finances and training
for "Saif," allegedly dispatched the terrorist squad.
But the FBI was not in a position to comment on the
targets of the two men in Germany.
One name came up time and again in the communique, and
one that pricked the Germans' ears: Dawood Ibrahim.
The 54-year-old arms trader is "India's most-wanted
man." The US government has listed him as a "global
terrorist" and persuaded the United Nations to place
his name on a list of supporters of terror. Ibrahim is
rumored to be the head of D-Company, a criminal
syndicate named after himself, and is believed to be
in charge of smuggling the suspected terrorists into
Germany.
Both the FBI and the BKA are attaching a lot of
importance to the information in the FBI communique.
But the intelligence services of the two countries --
the CIA in the United States and the BND and Office
for the Protection of the Constitution in Germany, the
country's foreign and domestic intelligence agencies,
respectively -- point to internal contradictions as
reasons for their skepticism. As they see it, for
example, it is highly unlikely that a Shiite group
would team up with Sunni terrorists, especially since
a good part of al-Qaida propaganda vilifies Shiites.
Other reasons for doubt include the facts that none of
the intelligence agencies was previously familiar with
an organization called "Saif," that there have been no
previously recorded threats against Germany by Indian
extremists, and that the whole scenario seems rather
implausible.
On the other hand, the FBI information is uncommonly
concrete. In addition to the names of the suspects, it
also provides information about the exact day on which
they are supposed to arrive in the United Arab
Emirates. Moreover, Ibrahim is believed to be one of
the men behind the terror attacks in Mumbai. If he
really is involved, that alone would be reason enough
for worry.
Abnormal Circumstances
Under normal circumstances, a message of this kind
from the United States would no doubt be cause for
serious-minded scrutiny, but it would not be a cause
for alarm. For example, the BKA would go through all
recent visa applications, and federal police officers
would take a closer look at all the people entering
Germany from Arab states. And the intelligence
services would make the rounds to see if any of its
partners had any helpful information on the matter.
Indeed, under normal circumstances, there are always a
lot of these communiques, most of which turn out to be
false alarms. But these are no normal circumstances.
Germany is in a state of emergency. Other countries,
such as the United States, employ a system of official
warning levels based on color codes that change --
from yellow to orange, for example -- when the danger
level is thought to increase. But, in Germany, the
interior minister is the barometer: He consults with
experts -- and then it is he who must call the shots.
For the minister, a situation like this presents a
dilemma. If he remains silent and something happens,
he's a failure. If he makes loud warning and nothing
happens, he's just a rabble-rouser trying to push
through controversial tougher security laws. And, of
course, the public never thanks you if everyday life
continues in a normal, peaceful way.
Absolute Security Remains a Pipe Dream
When de Maiziere became Germany's interior minister,
he had planned to lead the ministry in a level-headed
way. For example, he prefers to use phrases such as
"internal calm" rather than "internal security." And
it was only six weeks ago that he uttered the
sentence: "There's no cause for alarm." But, since
then, the chorus of warning voices has only ballooned
in size.
This change in course is the combined result of
everything that happened beforehand. It might very
well turn out that the alleged Indian terror squad
stays home and that the raid on the Reichstag never
happens. But what will remain is a well-founded
supposition that there is a critical mass of
terrorists in the border region between Afghanistan
and Pakistan that is thinking about launching attacks
in Europe -- and certainly in Germany, as well.
Raw Nerves
Given such circumstances, there is a major sense of
alarm among German officials. Last Thursday, just a
day after de Maiziere's shocking press conference, the
BKA issued a press release "in connection with the
current high-risk situation." It reported that a piece
of suspicious luggage had been discovered a day
earlier in Windhoek, the capital of Namibia, before
being loaded onto a plane bound for Germany. The
laptop bag contained batteries, wires, a detonator and
a clock -- in other words, all the ingredients you
need for a potential airborne catastrophe.
It sounded as if another terror plot had been foiled.
Had there been a plan to blow up Air Berlin Flight
7377 en route to Munich? And had the authorities, yet
again, discovered an explosive device at the last
minute? In the end, all the worry was unfounded. As it
turned out, the piece of luggage was a test device
built by a company that designs "real test" suitcases
to be used to test security measures. It remains
unclear who checked the bag in. But the fact that the
BKA was so quick to go into alarm mode -- and publicly
so -- has been a communications debacle.
Of course, these days, nobody wants to be the one that
wasn't sufficiently circumspect, the one who took too
long to speak up. No one wants a replay of situations
like the one from the beginning of November, when de
Maiziere didn't know for hours whether the package
that had arrived at the Chancellery contained actual
explosives or was just a false alarm. Now, the
threshold for sounding the alarm is already much
lower.
Bonded by Fear
Of course, you can never be too sure. Over the last 12
months, a series of attacks concocted in the
Afghan-Pakistani border region have been foiled in the
West. For example, in May, a car bomb set in New
York's Times Square by a man with ties to the
Pakistani Taliban failed to properly detonate. In
Copenhagen, al-Qaida had made plans to storm the
offices of the Jyllands-Posten newspaper as revenge
for its 2005 publishing of caricatures of the Prophet
Muhammad. In October 2009, David Headley, an American
citizen with Pakistani roots, was arrested after
having already visited the newspaper's offices in
order to scout them out before the planned attack.
Other targets reportedly included the subway systems
of New York City and Washington.
On the other hand, absolute security is a pipe dream.
For example, British authorities had even conducted
rehearsals for how to respond to possible attacks.
But, even so, when attacks claiming 56 lives
(including those of four attackers) did strike London,
on July 7, 2005, they were unable to prevent them.
Likewise, US intelligence services had warned India a
number of times that terrorists were planning attacks
in Mumbai.
The new situation in Germany has at least had one
positive side effect: For the time being, the
traditionally quarrelsome interior ministers from both
the state and the federal levels have refrained from
their usual bickering. Following informal talks held
last Thursday in Hamburg, Minister Bruch of
Rhineland-Palatinate noted that he had "never
experienced such harmony within this group" that has
apparently been bonded together by their shared fear.
Translated from the German by Josh Ward
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Ben West
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
Austin, TX
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Ben West
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
Austin, TX