The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2755
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14
2012-09-16
2012-09-17
2012-09-18
2012-09-19

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Re: INSIGHT - US/UK/French view on Libya operation

Released on 2012-03-06 07:00 GMT

Email-ID | 5101537
Date | 2011-03-19 04:15:13
From | marko.papic@stratfor.com
To | mark.schroeder@stratfor.com, secure@stratfor.com

I don't think anyone really thinks any European country has proven
military capability... Also, it is not just military capability. It is
also about the ability to lead on foreign policy.
And good questions on where this goes from here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Mark Schroeder" <mark.schroeder@stratfor.com>
To: "Marko Papic" <marko.papic@stratfor.com>
Cc: secure@stratfor.com
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 10:05:39 PM
Subject: Re: INSIGHT - US/UK/French view on Libya operation
in Europe itself, doesn't France already have a fairly proven military
capability? Among the Europeans, who doesn't think they're still a capable
power? They have their CDG, their advanced fighter jets, their capable
army, their foreign legion -- who can match them among the Europeans?
Germany doesn't need them to demonstrate an ability to intervene in Libya.
Might that just compel the Germans to think that they will need to
demonstrate they can go intervene somewhere? If France goes and ups the
stakes, where does this get France in the next few years, and then what
does Germany then start to calculate?
On 3/18/11 9:55 PM, Marko Papic wrote:
This part is awesome: The French are more complicated. They dont' need
the energy. The French had a multi-billion dollar contract signed with
Ghadafi for 40 Rafale jets, that was going to be the saving grace for
the French defense industry. Then the French (so he claims) hear about
AQIM threats backed by Ghadafi on French targets, and they got pissed.
Sarkozy painted himself in a corner. More than that, though, (and this
is what the british and the french guy agreed on,) was that this was
France really, really wanting to show that it can DO this. To prove its
relevance.
This is something that I have said as well in a few analysis we wrote on
this issue in the past few weeks -- and have had an itch for the past
two years that the French were really really looking for an opportunity
to do this (remember declaring war on AQIM and penning that military
agreement with the U.K.). It is part of trying to balance a rising
Germany... proving that you still matter in military matters, that when
it comes to "war", you lead Europe. This is not just about ego. If
Europe is to become a "player" it can't all be just widgets and euros,
someone has to have guns. So France has wanted, for the past couple of
years, to make that statement. And I don't think this is about Sarko's
ego either... France simply needs to assert that the leadership duo of
Europe is a duo and it's not just Germany alone.
Not sure this accomplishes it... but I do think this has informed their
thinking on everything from selling advanced naval tech to Russia to
penning that military agreement with the U.K.
First, France wants to lead the European response on the crisis in
Libya. As Berlin wrestles economic and political control of the eurozone
and the European Union from Paris a** to which Sarkozy has thus far
acquiesced for lack of any real alternative a** France wants to reassert
its leadership of Europe on foreign policy.
http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/20110311-european-disunity-libya
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Reva Bhalla" <bhalla@stratfor.com>
To: secure@stratfor.com
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 6:51:05 PM
Subject: INSIGHT - US/UK/French view on Libya operation
from a closed door mtg with a few US, one UK and one French air force
colonels
USAF could not be more thrilled with the resolution. They are
practically jumping out of their seats to do this operation --- it's a
dream op, as they call it - flat terrain, close to the coast, easy
targets. no prob.
What's funny is they're only looking at the 'op' as preventing Ghadafi
from retaking Benghazi. These guys aren't the decision-makers,
obviously, but the US guys are simply not looking at the 'what's next'
question. They brush it off as, we'll get the rebel forces into a mean
fighting force, they'll handle the rest. We took a group of rag tag
Afghans who were repressed into nothing and turned them into fighters,
why can't we do it with Libyans. (uhh...) They were amazed at my
skepticism.
The Egyptians are on the ground, arming and training the rebels.
From their perspective this whole operation is a UK-French-driven
campaign. The US was in many ways pushed into it. The resolution was
almost completely drafted by the Brits.
The UK guy says UK is driven by energy interests in this campaign. BP
post-oil spill is suffering in US< other options are to expand in
Siberia (problems with Russia), Vietnam and .. libya. They see a
Ghadafi ouster as the best way to meet their energy interests.
The French are more complicated. They dont' need the energy. The French
had a multi-billion dollar contract signed with Ghadafi for 40 Rafale
jets, that was going to be the saving grace for the French defense
industry. Then the French (so he claims) hear about AQIM threats backed
by Ghadafi on French targets, and they got pissed. Sarkozy painted
himself in a corner. More than that, though, (and this is what the
british and the french guy agreed on,) was that this was France really,
really wanting to show that it can DO this. To prove its relevance.
The Germans are opposed, but they all commented on how Germany
abstained. Germany has the stigma of being too close to Russia these
days and they think Merkel is trying to balance a bit more with the US
and plus wanted to look good in a leadership position in the UNSC
(acting responsibly, etc. instead of flat out voting against.)
The French guy was pissed b/c, as they claim, the French and the Brits
and the US air force all ready to go. They can start bombing within
hours. But, they started bitching about the petty bureaucracy. The US
Navy now wants to make sure it gets involved and are saying Tuesday to
get into position, maybe Wed start the operation
** Note - George believes this is the US deliberately buying time and
tryign to bluff ghadafi into a negotiation. They don't want this war.
Certainly Gates doesn't.
This has to be a US=-led operation. No question. All their excrcises
and the way NATO is configured only allows for a US-led operation. They
have yet to sort out all the ohter command and control issues. It sounds
like it'll be a giant mess.
There's also some fighting going on over what anti-air defense systems
to employ since the US has some new fancy stuff and they want to 'give
it away' or reveal their capabilities in something like this. This is
all central European air defenses anyway. They seem extremely confident
in the intel they have on EADs. Not so much about who's who in the
opposiiton (but let the agency, SF guys, allies like Egypt worry about
that.)
So, all in all, a lot of stereotypes confirmed. The Air Force is trying
to jump the gun, saying piece of cake, we got this, who cares about what
happens next. I'm sure the army is thinking you're out of your mind.
we're not getting ourselves into this. US appears to be buying time and
NATO unity on this operation is not assured. NATO may deploy a few jets
- keeping close to the mandate of 'protecting civilians' - if Ghadafi
doesn't shoot, NATO won't shoot (french guy seemed to be pretty clear
that the French wouldn't act if Q held to the ceasefire.)
So... maybe we'll have a weekend? I probably just jinxed us.
--
Marko Papic
STRATFOR Analyst
C: + 1-512-905-3091
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Marko Papic
STRATFOR Analyst
C: + 1-512-905-3091
marko.papic@stratfor.com