The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2755
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14
2012-09-16
2012-09-17
2012-09-18
2012-09-19

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Re: DISCUSSION -- Moscow's Moves in Central Europe

Released on 2012-08-24 04:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1748619
Date | 2010-04-14 18:12:39
From | marko.papic@stratfor.com
To | sean.noonan@stratfor.com

Order of countries in terms of priority:
Czech Republic
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Poland
Hungary
Bulgaria
Slovakia
Romania
As for NGOs we should start with "No bases". From there we can go and look
at any NGO that has an agenda such as:
- anti-nuclear energy
- anti-nuclear weapons
- anti - GMO
- peace NGOs
- NGOs and human rights groups that deal with Russian minorities
An OS sweep as an initial cut might make sense.
Sean Noonan wrote:
what countries are priorities? in rank order please. what media and
NGOs can you think of off the top of your head?
Sean Noonan wrote:
I have some general questions and thoughts (which must be taken with a
grain of salt as my understanding of Eurasia is limited)
1. "continuation of soviet tactics"--is it really? Or is it rather a
different and more careful extension of these tactics? I think we have
to be careful how we phrase and explain this. Your comparison is with
western Europe during that time, so that would mean that Russia's
ability to extend its influence is actually more limited (it is not
going as far West). And it has learned to apply more careful tactics
in a region where it had overt control before. So I'm not disagreeing
with you here, but I want to make sure we fully examine what tactics
Russia is applying where.
2. The problems with examining covert/clandestine tactics. Some are
going to be more obvious and identifiable than others.
For example, a whole lot of FSB guys on the ground in Kyrgyzstan is
very meaningful, but we don't always know what they are doing. We can
expect to see a lot of them all over this region, and an increasing
number (as in that report on Czech). But what exactly does that
mean? In kyrgyzstan we have pretty good arguments for their
involvement in the coup. What are we seeing in the central european
countries?
When it comes to media and NGOs it becomes more difficult. Some media
may very well be toeing Moscow's line and actively spreading certain
information, others may just have a pro-Russian viewpoint. Think of
CNN, or even Stratfor at times, that simply take a US-centric view on
certain topics. The information of Russian involvement during the
cold war with many different NGOs--from terrorist groups to
peaceniks--often became apparent much later. We can examine the past
MO and compare it with current events and draw parallels. We can look
at links between different groups and Russia government as well. In
the end though, these links will be pretty hard to identify. Look at
our current CSM discussion on the Chinese company Huawei--there's some
pretty serious speculation, but it's still speculation. Also remember
the KGB was the best of the best at disguising its links to these
different groups. I'm not saying this isn't worth investigating. It's
possible we could come up with some interesting links, such as between
the credit cards used in the Dubai assassination and Israel. I don't
want to get into the debate on that again, but basically it was a
fuck-up that made that information available. That, or really good
sourcing, will be required to make definite links. But we could also
produce a lot of very good conjecture that highlights different
anamolies--something stratfor is very good at.
Think more about what groups you've seen and we'll look into them
more.
Marko Papic wrote:
Interesting question.
Last thing Russia needs is an aggressive Poland (in the north) and
Romania (in the south) pushing against its sphere of influence.
Poland has cultural/historical/geographic ties to Belarus, as does
Lithuania. Same with Romania in Moldova. Russia does not want these
countries enlisting the rest of Central Europe, especially the
Slovaks, Czechs, Bulgarians and Hungarians -- in a broader counter
of Moscow's moves in Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova.
Therefore, you are in a way talking about reducing tensions so that
the focus can be shifted elsewhere.
This is essentially a continuation of Soviet tactics during the Cold
War. By the end of the 1960s, Moscow no longer actively sought
conversion of West European democracies to Communist rule. It began
assuaging their fears, nurturing such politics as Ostpolitik in
order to make sure that West European commitment to U.S. efforts to
roll back Russian influence in Hungary/Poland/Czech wavered.
Michael Wilson wrote:
As kind if an ancillary focus, is concentrating on such things
cheaper than threatening with military might, and/or does it allow
you to go ahead with military restructuring. In other words does
concentrating on such things allow you to refocus or shift
anything at home
Marko Papic wrote:
The ongoing "charm offensive" in Poland combined with the
tactics that Moscow used in taking out Kyrgyzstan has given me
the idea that we should perhaps be looking at NGOs, human rights
groups, media (RT), propaganda tools and other tactics that
Russia uses in the rest of the world, Central Europe
specifically.
Two items actually jumped at me today that talked about this:
-- This item from Estonian Security Policy about how Russia is
expanding media influence in the Baltics:
http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/markets_and_companies/?doc=25742&ins_print
-- This item from Ukraine about pro-Russian NGOs in Crimea
(attached below since it arrived through BBC Monitoring)
Also, take a look at this piece from late 2008
(http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/20080925_czech_republic_russias_increasing_intelligence_activities)
in which we talked about a report from the Czech
counterintelligence service, Security Information Service (BIS)
about the influence of Russian intelligence operatives in Czech
Republic.
This is nothing new. Soviet Union was extremely adept at using
left-wing and environmental groups -- sometimes even without
their knowledge -- as an unaware "fifth column" in Western
European states. Look at the example of the UK Campaign for
Nuclear Disarmament (whose symbol, by the way, is the peace sign
and was later coopted by the peace movement) from the 1980s
which apparently received funding from the USSR. Guess who was
this groups' national treasurer... Catherine Ashton, the current
EU "foreign minister".
The Polish "charm offensive" shows us that Russia does not want
to dominate Central Europe anymore. That is not their strategy.
Russians want to return to the borders of the former Soviet
Union -- extent of the borders being the mountains -- but they
are not seeking confrontation with NATO on the North European
Plain, at least not yet. This means that they don't need Central
Europeans to be under their control, they just need them to
acquiesce in Russia's dominance of Eastern Europe, Belarus,
Ukraine, Caucasus and Central Asia.
This also means that Central Europe today is in the role of
Western Europe during the Cold War, which means that Russia will
try to convince them that it is not a threat, that they should
not ally with warmongering US and that they should accept the
Russian sphere of influence. Various NGOs,
environmental/human-rights/peace groups as well as a glossy and
sophisticated propaganda machine (RT is no Pravda) are part of
this.
I am suggesting that I pair up with our TACTICAL crew to do a
piece on this. Considering the events in Poland and Kyrgyzstan,
this looks like a very timely piece.
Any thoughts? challenges? questions? comments?
--
Marko Papic
STRATFOR
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
700 Lavaca Street, Suite 900
Austin, TX 78701 - U.S.A
TEL: + 1-512-744-4094
FAX: + 1-512-744-4334
marko.papic@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Michael Wilson
Watchofficer
STRATFOR
michael.wilson@stratfor.com
(512) 744 4300 ex. 4112
--
Marko Papic
STRATFOR
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
700 Lavaca Street, Suite 900
Austin, TX 78701 - U.S.A
TEL: + 1-512-744-4094
FAX: + 1-512-744-4334
marko.papic@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
ADP- Tactical Intelligence
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
ADP- Tactical Intelligence
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Marko Papic
STRATFOR
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
700 Lavaca Street, Suite 900
Austin, TX 78701 - U.S.A
TEL: + 1-512-744-4094
FAX: + 1-512-744-4334
marko.papic@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com