The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2755
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14
2012-09-16
2012-09-17
2012-09-18
2012-09-19

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Re: [CT] DISCUSSION GERMANY/CT-The Story Behind Germany's Terror Threat

Released on 2012-08-12 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 2007872
Date | 2010-11-22 18:53:25
From | ben.west@stratfor.com
To | ct@stratfor.com
List-Name | ct@stratfor.com

Europeans have still found a way to blame Americans for warnings in the
past.
And yes, something very well could be in the works, but given the fact
that jihadists constantly want to attack the west, is it really at all
significant that something is in the works?
I think we'd seen past plots with travel plans... I'd have to look harder
to get specifics, but I don't think that's all that novel.
Agree that the security officials are in a catch-22 situation.
On 11/22/2010 11:43 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
There is a notable difference here. And that is the German warning
issued last week. It was based on their own intelligence not American
intelligence--so no blaming americans this time. Yes, it's true that
they don't have the capability to attack the Reichstag, and theat the
attack is not imminent, as I pointed out. But on the other hand, like
with cargo parcels, it doesn't mean that something is not in the works.
Have we ever seen information this specific before on the individuals
and their travel plans?
This is the conundrum of warning intelligence, when the warning is
given (just to policymakers, or to the public), measures are taken that
prevent it. It then comes the boy-who-cried-wolf, even if the warning
was originally accurate.
Not to mention, given what happened with the last double agent to become
public (Khost), it will be interesting to follow this one.
On 11/22/10 11:33 AM, Ben West wrote:
I agree that the spiegel article was good - but this is the kind of
thing we've seen over and over again in Europe. Source from durkastan
says that aq is going to target Europe and kill lots of people and
that attackers are en route. Everyone gets freaked out. Nothing
significant happens. Europe blames US of scare mongering.
Certainly islamists have europe in their cross-hairs, but if an attack
is going to happen, it's not going be preceded by this kind of
publicity.
Also, attacking the reichstag? I mean, it's possible to ATTACK it, but
they've got a pretty heavy security presence there that would prevent
a hostage situation. I was there a few years ago. The public entryway
is confined to one doorway with a heavy guard presence, metal
detectors, x-ray machines, etc. If anything, an attack could kill lots
of tourists lined up outside, but it would take a very serious force
to be able to gain entrance to the reichstag and an even more well
trained force to actually hold hostages. This sounds like a pipe-dream
to me.
On 11/22/2010 11:04 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
thoughts?
On 11/22/10 11:00 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
It is up to you and CT how you approach this. On the short-term,
this looks like something you can handle without me. If you want
to dabble in the more long-term view of what is going on here, I
would love to help.
On 11/22/10 10:58 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
In the more long-term, I think an analysis of the German
intelligence agencies would be good too. They have been pretty
decimated by the Cold War and by all the problems associated
with running an intelligence agency in a post-Gestapo country.
If Germany is ever going to become a world power again, however,
they would need to overcome these deamons as well. That is sort
of the last straw for Germany, the one that is going to be most
sensitive to overcome. But perhaps this case may illustrate how
they are already overcoming these issues.
On 11/22/10 10:50 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
Main problem is that Der Spiegel is just that good, they've at
least touched on most of what I would want to say about it.
The main thing here is how the politics of a terror
threat/alert coincide with the reality of the threat itself.
We saw that Germany was fairly relaxed bout the earlier threat
in Europe released by the US. I'm not sure if that was the
same as the info that the FBI passed over about this shia
group, Saif (I don't know anything about them). But something
changed, as we noted last week in their interpretation. That
seems to go down to this virtual walk-in. The one thing I was
left confused about is whether BKA had ever been in contact
with this source before. It sounds like he cold called them.
It's common knowledge that walk-ins, rather than recruits, are
nearly always the best sources. But at the same time, they
are very suspicious as double agents. If this was a US source
they would be freaking the fuck out after having Al-Balawi
turn on them. The germans seem to have cooler heads, but they
will be working 24/7 to verify the source (let me make another
plug for John Lecarre's A Most Wanted Man here, most of his
career was in Germany).
They've clearly got enough corroborating information that they
consider this a real threat. But politically they are faced
with the universal 'damned if you do, damned if you don't'
alert problem. If the Interior ministry doesn't say
something, they will be liable if an attack occurs. Look at
the constant press over information on the warning
intelligence for Mumbai. As we've said before, simply issuing
the warning may help to deter the attackers.
The real important bit here, is that it seems the germans have
fairly good intelligence. While this attack is still not
happening tomorrow, they have a lot of details about what
might be in the works, rather than a single-source intercept
that indicates some vague threat. It seems they've increased
security pretty well at the Bundestag, and want to add to the
presence at any possible target. This is where we seem them
scrambling, and where their intelligence holes are.
The task now for the germans is to verify this source. Maybe
even pick him up and put him on ice somewhere (Fred/Stick?),
not in GErmany but in Pakistan/Afghanistan. That will require
some cooperation with either/both the Americans and
Pakistanis. They also need to verify all the bio information
they have on these 4-6 guys trying to get into germany and
watch travelers very carefully. The germans seem to be very
good at surveilling these threats within Germany, so their
best luck may come when one of the guys overseas contacts a
local already under surveillance.
At minimum, this could be a pretty interesting tearline this
week. Both the walk-in issues and the CIA/FBI liaison
conflicts that I havne't gotten into here.
On 11/22/10 10:34 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
Any thoughts on where you guys are thinking of going with
this?
Der Spiegel article is indeed interesting.
On 11/22/10 9:28 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
Great report from Der Spiegel (thanks Mikey). I suggest
anyone interested to read the whole thing. They ask the
right questions, and while not as much detail as I hoped,
give us a much better understanding on the threat in
Germany.
The BKA (germany's FBI) must be extremely busy verifying
the details of this virtual walk-in. It obviously caused
the germans to shit their pants. But the real questions
are buried in the article---how real was this plot, how
real is the source, is the source just trying to get back
to the land of brezeln and bier? Trying to double-cross
them somehow?
Also note the tip off from the FBI (cue fred), not the
usual CIA liaison with BND.
For Eurasia, there's a lot in here on the internal
politics of the interior minister position, and the
relation between state and federal government.
On 11/22/10 8:55 AM, Michael Wilson wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [OS] GERMANY/CT-The Story Behind Germany's
Terror Threat
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:38:21 -0600
From: Graham Smith <graham.smith@stratfor.com>
Reply-To: The OS List <os@stratfor.com>
To: os@stratfor.com
11/22/2010 11:38 AM
Fears of a Mumbai Redux
The Story Behind Germany's Terror Threat
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,730377,00.html
By Matthias Bartsch, Yassin Musharbash and Holger Stark
Germany is currently in a state of high alert. Security
officials are warning that they have concrete
information pointing to a possible terror attack on the
federal parliament building in Berlin, a massively
popular tourist attraction. The days of Interior
Minister Thomas de Maiziere's reserved stances in
dealing with such warnings appear to be over.
The call came from abroad, and the man speaking
hurriedly on the other end of the line sounded as if he
feared for his life. He wanted out, he told the officers
of the German Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) --
out of the terrorist scene. He wanted to come back to
Germany, back to his family. Then he asked if German
officials could help him.
Right now, they're trying to do just that. The BKA is
pursuing the case under the codename "Nova." The
apparently remorseful man could be an important possible
whistleblower from a dangerous region of the globe. In
fact, he is also the most recent reason why German
Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere put the entire
country in a state of fright on Wednesday.
During a hastily called press conference that day, de
Maiziere stated that Germany faced the threat of
terrorist attacks that might be launched against the
country at some point in November. As he put it, Germany
is "presently dealing with a new situation."
Just two days earlier, the source had called for the
third time in just a short period and provided more
information. He told officials that a small group of
terrorists wanted to conduct a raid on the Reichstag
building in Berlin, which houses the federal parliament,
and that that was only one of the targets included in
their attack plans.
Germany on High Alert
Since then, Germany has been in a state of high alert.
The Reichstag is surrounded with barricades and its
popular cupola tourist attraction temporarily closed to
visitors. Police armed with submachine guns are
patrolling major railway stations and airports. And
vacations have been called off for officials at the
country's security agencies. Wherever they have cause
for doing so, the authorities are secretly monitoring
communications, conducting surveillance operations and
launching undercover investigations. At the moment,
investigators seem to be at a loss; their modus
operandi: "We'll prod the shrubs and see if we can flush
out any birds."
"There is cause for worry, but no cause for hysteria,"
de Maiziere assured his listeners. But while he has
never been much of an agitator, his colleagues at the
state level have described the situation in much more
drastic terms. Uwe Schu:nemann, for example, who has
been the interior minister of the northwestern state of
Lower Saxony since 2003, stated that he had "never
experienced a heightened security situation like this
one." And Berlin Senator for the Interior Ehrhart
Ko:rting, whose position is tantamount to that of a
government minister in the city-state, has already even
gone so far as to call on the inhabitants of the German
capital city to report suspicious-looking individuals of
Arab origin to the police. "If you suddenly see three
somewhat strange-looking men who are new to your
neighborhood, who hide their faces and who only speak
Arabic," Ko:rting said, "you should report them to the
authorities."
Under heightened pressure, officials in Germany's 16
federal states are now checking to see when and where
major events are scheduled to take place this coming
week within their boundaries. And nothing suggested as a
possible target is being discounted, no matter how
unlikely. For example, officials in Rhineland-Palatinate
warned the state's interior minister, Karl Peter Burch,
that there was always a lot going on at IKEA stores on
Saturdays.[WTF]
Serenity, Scaremongering and Strategy
Since last week, German politicians at both the state
and federal levels have once again had to figure out how
they will handle themselves when making warnings about
terrorist attacks. They have had to come up with a
language that can simultaneously convey both an alert
and a sense of calm.
This is no easy task. For one thing, this isn't the
first time this has happened. In September 2009, for
example, right before federal elections were held, there
were concrete threats that resulted in a heightened
security situation. But, in the end, nothing happened.
This time around, people are wondering whether they are
on the precipice of an emergency or whether these are
once again empty threats.
Still, one thing is certain: For the time being, Germany
has become a different country -- more nervous, more
anxious, more agitated. And Germany's domestic security
policies are being put to the test.
When Interior Minister de Maiziere assumed his office in
October 2009 in conservative Chancellor Angela Merkel's
government, he aimed to cool down the heated sense of
alarm regularly fanned out by his predecessors. What's
more, the man who had served as Merkel's chief of staff
in Chancellery until being moved to the role of interior
minister in her new government, was given the task of
nurturing a more relaxed relationship between her party,
the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), and its new
coalition partner, the business-friendly Free Democratic
Party (FDP). In particular, it was his job to not draw
out the long-standing conflict over domestic security
policies with the Justice Ministry, which has been led
since the 2009 election by Sabine
Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, a member of the FDP.
Indeed, Merkel feared that the quarrelsome FDP might try
to capitalize on the issue to win over more voters, so
she assigned de Maiziere to prevent that from happening.
In fact, the plan was to repeat the same strategy that
the CDU and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian
Social Union (CSU), had used when they were in the
so-called "grand coalition" with the center-left Social
Democratic Party, between 2005 and 2009. At the time,
they made a point of undermining the SPD by championing
what had traditionally been the latter party's issues.
A Game-Changer
But now the game plan has changed. This November will
drastically alter de Maiziere's understanding of his
role in office. If he tries to return things to their
previous state of calm, he's going to have a very tough
time. In fact, it's much more likely that he will be a
completely different interior minister.
For a while now, de Maiziere's softer stance has
prompted opposition by politicians on the right involved
with domestic security issues. But they are now calling
louder than ever for a tougher course to be followed.
Merkel is also adjusting to the new situation and is
reportedly happy with the way de Maiziere handled
himself last week. Likewise, no one seems to have voiced
any criticism last Thursday evening during a meeting of
the Coalition Committee, a regular gathering of the
parties that are part of the government.
The almost complete lack of protest has a lot to do with
where the alarming information is coming from. In fact,
information regarding the supposedly imminent attacks
has come from two independent sources. Shortly before
receiving the telephone call about the planned attacks,
BKA officials had received a cable from their American
counterparts at the FBI, America's federal police force,
warning of possible attacks.
Still, what truth is there in these "security-related"
pieces of information coming from both domestic and
foreign sources? And, given all the discrepancies in the
warning messages, just how much do they deserve to be
trusted? Indeed, even among security officials
themselves, there is some doubt about how legitimate
these statements are -- and about just how acute the
danger threatening Germany really is.
An Attack Modelled after Mumbai[plot details in this
section]
What the caller reported was undeniably alarming.
According to him, al-Qaida and associated groups based
in Pakistan were making joint preparations for an attack
in Germany. One idea was to remotely detonate a bomb
using a mobile phone. Another called for a small group
of terrorists to storm the Reichstag with guns blazing,
take hostages and end everything in one calamitous
bloodbath. Indeed, BKA officials learned that the latter
plan had been modeled on the storming of luxury hotels
in Mumbai, the Indian capital, almost exactly two years
ago, in a massacre that left 175 people dead.
According to the caller, the plan called for the
terrorists to procure the submachine guns, automatic
rifles, explosives and whatever else they would need to
storm Germany's parliament building in the Balkans. He
said that two men had already traveled to Germany six to
eight weeks earlier, adding that one had the nom de
guerre of "Abu Mohammed" and that the other one was a
German of Turkish origin. Both apparently had roots in
the Greater Berlin metropolitan area, were currently
unemployed and living off of welfare payments and had
immersed themselves in the anonymity provided by a major
city -- until the time should come for their activation.
Likewise, there were allegedly four other volunteers --
including a German, a Turk, a North African and another
jihadist of unknown identity -- in the training camps
run by al-Qaida and related groups waiting for the
signal to travel to Germany. And, according to the
telephone source, al-Qaida's plan was to attack in
February or March.
The only question now relates to just how credible the
caller's statements are. He is an insider who joined up
with armed groups several months ago and has earned a
reputation as a fanatic fighter.
But could it be that he is only trying to tell German
officials the juiciest things possible in order to raise
his own market value and thereby prompt them to extract
him from the terror scene? Or could it be that al-Qaida
is even planning a second spectacular coup like the one
in December 2009, when the Americans allowed a
supposedly top-level turncoat onto an American military
base without any sort of pat-down, who went on to
detonate his explosive vest and blow seven CIA officials
to bits?
A Strange Message
A clear picture has yet to emerge. And one reason for
this is also the fact that it was only two weeks ago
that the FBI first decided to share information about
another possible attack with German officials.
In this case, even the way contact was made was unusual.
Under normal circumstances, liaisons from the CIA
station in Germany are the ones to communicate American
warnings to their German counterparts. But, this time
around, it was an apparently particularly anxious FBI
that chose to directly notify the BKA.
The FBI told the Germans about an obscure Indian group
called "Saif," or "sword." Despite being a Shiite group,
it had allegedly made a pact with al-Qaida, a Sunni
organization, and sent five of its men to the Pakistani
province of Waziristan for training. According to the
FBI, two volunteers -- who were already equipped with
visas allowing them to travel freely within the 25
European countries belonging to the Schengen zone --
were supposedly already en route to Germany and would
enter the United Arab Emirates on Monday, Nov. 22.
There, they would allegedly be provided with new travel
documents before traveling on to Germany. One of the men
is supposedly named "Khan," which is about as common in
that part of the world as "Smith" is in English-speaking
countries. And no firm conclusion had been made about
their nationalities.
The FBI agents even named the presumed masterminds
behind the operation. A certain Mushtaq Altaf
Bin-Khadri, who is in charge of finances and training
for "Saif," allegedly dispatched the terrorist squad.
But the FBI was not in a position to comment on the
targets of the two men in Germany.
One name came up time and again in the communique, and
one that pricked the Germans' ears: Dawood Ibrahim. The
54-year-old arms trader is "India's most-wanted man."
The US government has listed him as a "global terrorist"
and persuaded the United Nations to place his name on a
list of supporters of terror. Ibrahim is rumored to be
the head of D-Company, a criminal syndicate named after
himself, and is believed to be in charge of smuggling
the suspected terrorists into Germany.
Both the FBI and the BKA are attaching a lot of
importance to the information in the FBI communique. But
the intelligence services of the two countries -- the
CIA in the United States and the BND and Office for the
Protection of the Constitution in Germany, the country's
foreign and domestic intelligence agencies, respectively
-- point to internal contradictions as reasons for their
skepticism. As they see it, for example, it is highly
unlikely that a Shiite group would team up with Sunni
terrorists, especially since a good part of al-Qaida
propaganda vilifies Shiites. Other reasons for doubt
include the facts that none of the intelligence agencies
was previously familiar with an organization called
"Saif," that there have been no previously recorded
threats against Germany by Indian extremists, and that
the whole scenario seems rather implausible.
On the other hand, the FBI information is uncommonly
concrete. In addition to the names of the suspects, it
also provides information about the exact day on which
they are supposed to arrive in the United Arab Emirates.
Moreover, Ibrahim is believed to be one of the men
behind the terror attacks in Mumbai. If he really is
involved, that alone would be reason enough for worry.
Abnormal Circumstances
Under normal circumstances, a message of this kind from
the United States would no doubt be cause for
serious-minded scrutiny, but it would not be a cause for
alarm. For example, the BKA would go through all recent
visa applications, and federal police officers would
take a closer look at all the people entering Germany
from Arab states. And the intelligence services would
make the rounds to see if any of its partners had any
helpful information on the matter.
Indeed, under normal circumstances, there are always a
lot of these communiques, most of which turn out to be
false alarms. But these are no normal circumstances.
Germany is in a state of emergency. Other countries,
such as the United States, employ a system of official
warning levels based on color codes that change -- from
yellow to orange, for example -- when the danger level
is thought to increase. But, in Germany, the interior
minister is the barometer: He consults with experts --
and then it is he who must call the shots.
For the minister, a situation like this presents a
dilemma. If he remains silent and something happens,
he's a failure. If he makes loud warning and nothing
happens, he's just a rabble-rouser trying to push
through controversial tougher security laws. And, of
course, the public never thanks you if everyday life
continues in a normal, peaceful way.
Absolute Security Remains a Pipe Dream
When de Maiziere became Germany's interior minister, he
had planned to lead the ministry in a level-headed way.
For example, he prefers to use phrases such as "internal
calm" rather than "internal security." And it was only
six weeks ago that he uttered the sentence: "There's no
cause for alarm." But, since then, the chorus of warning
voices has only ballooned in size.
This change in course is the combined result of
everything that happened beforehand. It might very well
turn out that the alleged Indian terror squad stays home
and that the raid on the Reichstag never happens. But
what will remain is a well-founded supposition that
there is a critical mass of terrorists in the border
region between Afghanistan and Pakistan that is thinking
about launching attacks in Europe -- and certainly in
Germany, as well.
Raw Nerves
Given such circumstances, there is a major sense of
alarm among German officials. Last Thursday, just a day
after de Maiziere's shocking press conference, the BKA
issued a press release "in connection with the current
high-risk situation." It reported that a piece of
suspicious luggage had been discovered a day earlier in
Windhoek, the capital of Namibia, before being loaded
onto a plane bound for Germany. The laptop bag contained
batteries, wires, a detonator and a clock -- in other
words, all the ingredients you need for a potential
airborne catastrophe.
It sounded as if another terror plot had been foiled.
Had there been a plan to blow up Air Berlin Flight 7377
en route to Munich? And had the authorities, yet again,
discovered an explosive device at the last minute? In
the end, all the worry was unfounded. As it turned out,
the piece of luggage was a test device built by a
company that designs "real test" suitcases to be used to
test security measures. It remains unclear who checked
the bag in. But the fact that the BKA was so quick to go
into alarm mode -- and publicly so -- has been a
communications debacle.
Of course, these days, nobody wants to be the one that
wasn't sufficiently circumspect, the one who took too
long to speak up. No one wants a replay of situations
like the one from the beginning of November, when de
Maiziere didn't know for hours whether the package that
had arrived at the Chancellery contained actual
explosives or was just a false alarm. Now, the threshold
for sounding the alarm is already much lower.
Bonded by Fear
Of course, you can never be too sure. Over the last 12
months, a series of attacks concocted in the
Afghan-Pakistani border region have been foiled in the
West. For example, in May, a car bomb set in New York's
Times Square by a man with ties to the Pakistani Taliban
failed to properly detonate. In Copenhagen, al-Qaida had
made plans to storm the offices of the Jyllands-Posten
newspaper as revenge for its 2005 publishing of
caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad. In October 2009,
David Headley, an American citizen with Pakistani roots,
was arrested after having already visited the
newspaper's offices in order to scout them out before
the planned attack. Other targets reportedly included
the subway systems of New York City and Washington.
On the other hand, absolute security is a pipe dream.
For example, British authorities had even conducted
rehearsals for how to respond to possible attacks. But,
even so, when attacks claiming 56 lives (including those
of four attackers) did strike London, on July 7, 2005,
they were unable to prevent them. Likewise, US
intelligence services had warned India a number of times
that terrorists were planning attacks in Mumbai.
The new situation in Germany has at least had one
positive side effect: For the time being, the
traditionally quarrelsome interior ministers from both
the state and the federal levels have refrained from
their usual bickering. Following informal talks held
last Thursday in Hamburg, Minister Bruch of
Rhineland-Palatinate noted that he had "never
experienced such harmony within this group" that has
apparently been bonded together by their shared fear.
Translated from the German by Josh Ward
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Ben West
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
Austin, TX
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Ben West
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
Austin, TX