The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2701
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14
2012-09-16
2012-09-17
2012-09-18
2012-09-19

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Re: S3* - MESA/CT/MIL - WikiLeaks posts huge encrypted file to Web

Released on 2012-02-29 03:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1184240
Date | 2010-08-06 15:47:53
From | benjamin.preisler@stratfor.com
To | analysts@stratfor.com, nathan.hughes@stratfor.com
List-Name | analysts@stratfor.com

This is a pretty cool tool to come out of the Wikileaks data
http://ekstrabladet.dk/indsigt/warlogs-1/
Nate Hughes wrote:
True, but gotta watch for the ideologies. Not above breaking the law or
anything like that, but pretty fanatical in their beliefs. This
wikileaks guy talks a lot about 'justice' and shit like that...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "scott stewart" <scott.stewart@stratfor.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:10:08 -0500 (CDT)
To: 'Analyst List'<analysts@stratfor.com>
ReplyTo: Analyst List <analysts@stratfor.com>
Subject: RE: S3* - MESA/CT/MIL - WikiLeaks posts huge encrypted file to
Web
They try to portray themselves as all idealistic, but by and large, the
hacker community is pretty mercenary. I can see him selling copies to
intelligence agencies to make some quick scratch and build his server
farm....
The Chinese and Russians don't leak intelligence they vacuum it up.
From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com
[mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com] On Behalf Of Marc Lanthemann
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 5:01 PM
To: Analyst List
Subject: Re: S3* - MESA/CT/MIL - WikiLeaks posts huge encrypted file to
Web
I don't think that the copies can be purchased. It's the complete
opposite of wikileaks' mission. They are as a public dissemination
organization, not a private intelligence agency. Selling information to
private parties is just unthinkable to those guys, they seek the glory
of being whistle blowers, not monetary profit. They think of themselves
as the freedom of press' Robin Hoods, taking info from the rich and
powerful to give to the poor and ignorant masses.
If this is, as you said, a media operation, they wouldn't risk the
Chinese or the Russians leaking that info and taking away their credit.
Assuming it's similar to the previous leaks, the biggest damage those
documents can do is by being leaked. It's not like the PRA is going to
learn anything about out tactics they didn't know already. So China
would only pay for this document for its potentially destabilizing
value. This implies some sort of dissemination. If someone is going to
leak that document it's wikileaks, ergo they won't give/sell it to
anyone else.
On 8/5/10 3:43 PM, scott stewart wrote:
The sources and methods concern is already out the window. This material
is already out there and I'm certain that anybody who wanted to purchase
it on the side from Assange could do so. I'm sure the Chinese and
Russians already have complete copies, probably even the ISI has bought
a copy.
Now the issue is really more about damage control, and spinning the
perception of events in the USGs favor.
From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com
[mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com] On Behalf Of Sean Noonan
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:36 PM
To: Analyst List
Subject: Re: S3* - MESA/CT/MIL - WikiLeaks posts huge encrypted file to
Web
I'm not sure what you're saying here--- if you mean that Assange wants
this to appear like a Keanue Reeves movie you are right on. In terms of
the US concerns, i'm pretty confident in my analysis. There's no crazy
conspiracy here, but the US is going to do what it can to limit and
protect that information. The key is protecting sources and methods.
While there was nothing crazy in the last file dump, it still outed
both. I'm not saying the US is going to do any major covert operation or
whatever to get Assange nor that they are going to be intimidated by
this 'insurance' file. They're going to quickly rethink how they are
going to get him, but they're not going to be scared by this. They
might be more motivated to negotiate in some way.
Marko Papic wrote:
I will say one thing... if you submitted this as a script to Hollywood,
they'd say it is too ludicrous.
Unless it was the 1990s... in which case they would cast Keanu Reeves
as Assange
Sean Noonan wrote:
I think it is actually the smartest move he could make. The US wants
him....pretty badly. So, he can assume he will be pursued for arrest,
maybe even rendition (I doubt that, and definitely doubt any
assassination BS) wherever he goes. Putting this file up there makes
the US think twice about arresting him. And Marc, you are right that
now the US can be concerned about his well-being, especially if they
have been given clues abou what's in the file and really don't want it
out. Looking at the information in the last leak, none of it was of any
serious value (except in endangering US operatives). Let's assume this
is more valuable, but it's still hard to believe it is that valuable.
Wikileaks wants the public to think these are crazy revelations coming
out. For example, everything in those files people could've learned
from reading STRATFOR, but now that it has the hype of being
'classified' and 'leaked' more people are paying attention.
Even if the information is valuable enough to the US to really try to
protect, I highly doubt whatever information this might have will be so
damaging to the US that any foreign group or country would find it
valuable enough to assassinate Assange. Would any foreign intelligence
agency or militant group dealing with the US want it leaked? Yes,
definitely, but it is not of such value to them to accept the risk to
force the information out there. At best a foreign country would offer
him some sort of protected asylum in return for access (but would he
accept that? not on his ideology).
So now the US has to figure out how to get its hand on this file, any
other information Assange might have while having enough information for
a prosecution and preventing the 'insurance' from being 'collected.'
This gives him a delay in which he can move around, maybe better protect
himself and at worst work out a deal with the US. If the US really was
so concerned about, he would already be in custody. It would have to be
truly disastrous information, and I highly doubt it is.
He's making a smart media ploy, and creating enough of a distraction
that it's probably better for his personal security. The larger his
profile, the harder it is for US security services to arrest,
interrogate and neutralize (I don't mean kill) him.
Marc Lanthemann wrote:
I came up with some more thoughts/points while discussing this with
Sean:
o The general guess is that Insurance contains the remaining 15k
Afghan docs, but it could either be something more damaging or total
bluff.
o In any case the US govt wouldn't want to risk public dissemination.
Which means they can't really arrest him, kill him or send him to a
relaxation spa in Cuba or Poland.
o Therefore Assange's life/liberty is somewhat important for US
national security.
o Pushing this reasoning forward, killing Assange would be detrimental
for the US.
o I don't know who would benefit from further leaks and political
shitstorms in the US, but that person/government may have it in them
to cap Assange.
o The US needs to make sure nobody gets to him.
o All in all, not a particularly brilliant self-preservation move from
Assange.
On 8/5/10 2:25 PM, Marc Lanthemann wrote:
FYI, talked to some of my CS/hacker-savvy friends. The file is encrypted
using a 256 bit AES encryption, which is what the US government uses for
classified documentation. There are no known weaknesses to this
encryption and it would take longer than the lifetime of the sun to
brute-force the code using all the supercomputers currently in
existence. You'd need a super secret quantum computer or the biggest
breakthrough in cryptoanalysis ever.
Bottom line we'll only get access to the files when Wikileaks feels like
releasing the password. This has been making lots of waves in the
hacker/nerd community, and I spent some time browsing hacker forums for
ideas. Serious people (as serious as webforum hackers can be) are
talking about a sort of dead man trigger, password must be entered by
Assange every X hours/days or the password is released.
In any case, NSA is going to get a headache over this. It might even be
a bluff and turn out to be Assange's randomly encrypted copy of Bambi.
On 8/5/10 1:31 PM, Michael Wilson wrote:
no idea what is really on
WikiLeaks posts huge encrypted file to Web
The Associated Press
Thursday, August 5, 2010; 1:30 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/05/AR2010080504526.html
LONDON -- Online whistle-blower WikiLeaks has posted a huge encrypted
file named "Insurance" to its website, sparking speculation that those
behind the organization may be prepared to release more classified
information if authorities interfere with them.
Bloggers have noted that it's 20 times larger than the batch of 77,000
secret U.S. military documents about Afghanistan that WikiLeaks dumped
onto the Web last month. Contributors to tech sites such as CNet have
speculated that the file could be a way of threatening to disclose more
information if WikiLeaks' staffers were detained or if the site was
attacked, although the organization itself has kept mum.
"As a matter of policy, we do not discuss security procedures,"
WikiLeaks said Thursday in an e-mail response to questions about the 1.4
gigabyte file.
Editor-in-chief Julian Assange was a bit more expansive - if equally
cryptic - in his response to the same line of questioning in a
television interview with independent U.S. news network Democracy Now!
"I think it's better that we don't comment on that," Assange said,
according to the network's transcript of the interview. "But, you know,
one could imagine in a similar situation that it might be worth ensuring
that important parts of history do not disappear."
Assange, a former computer hacker, has expressed concern over his safety
in the past, complaining of surveillance and telling interviewers that
he's been warned away from visiting the United States.
Since the publication of the Afghanistan files, at least one activist
associated with the site has been questioned by U.S. authorities.
Programmer Jacob Appelbaum, who filled in for Assange at a conference
last month, was reportedly detained and questioned about the site by
officials after arriving in the U.S. on a flight from the Netherlands.
ad_icon
U.S. officials have had harsh words for Assange, with Adm. Michael
Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, saying he and his
colleagues had disclosed potentially life-threatening information and
might already have blood on their hands.
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has refused to rule out the
possibility that Assange could be a target into the military's
investigation into the leak.
---
--
Michael Wilson
Watch Officer, STRAFOR
Office: (512) 744 4300 ex. 4112
Email: michael.wilson@stratfor.com
--
Michael Wilson
Watch Officer, STRAFOR
Office: (512) 744 4300 ex. 4112
Email: michael.wilson@stratfor.com
--
Marc Lanthemann
Research Intern
Mobile: +1 609-865-5782
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Marc Lanthemann
Research Intern
Mobile: +1 609-865-5782
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Marc Lanthemann
Research Intern
Mobile: +1 609-865-5782
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com