The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2690
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14
2012-09-16
2012-09-17

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Fwd: Re: Zaur

Released on 2012-02-29 03:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1209471
Date | 2010-12-06 06:37:06
From | lauren.goodrich@stratfor.com
To | confed@stratfor.com

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Zaur
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:21:48 -0600
From: Lauren Goodrich <lauren.goodrich@stratfor.com>
To: Zaur Hasanov <hasanovz@yahoo.com>
CC: Lauren Goodrich <goodrich@stratfor.com>
Hello Zaur!
Here are my answers. I hope they reach you in time. Let me know if you
have any follow-up questions.
Lauren
We are also thinking on wikileaks in Azerbaijan. What's your take on it, I
mean of Stratfor?
This latest round of WikiLeaks of more than 250,000 U.S. State Department
diplomatic cables has revealed very little that was not previously known.
There has not been a single Top Secret report like the Pentagon Papers of
1971. Each of the WikiLeaks releases have instead been fairly low-level
reports of even lower levels of classification-despite the cables being
classified.
The leaks will not affect much in ways of operation, but are instead
diplomatically embarrassing. The cables reveal what is widely known in the
world - that countries' representatives act one way and say another. The
cables cut through much of the diplomatic and theatrical dialogues seen in
public and instead lay out much of the reality between countries. But such
frank discussions are meant to be held in confidence since there are
larger games and balances to be held outside of a bilateral discussion.
This is how diplomacy and the real back-channel negotiations work.
Do you see in a purposeful leak by US officials or it is happened really?
The U.S. at this time can not afford to have such a scandal as its
relationships around the world are already strained, so STRATFOR believes
that the leaks are genuine instead of purposefully orchestrated.
Also what do you think Azerbaijan can expect from the leak? There are
tons of stories not published yet. The leak already irritates officials
here. If wikileak will continue to publish stories about high ranking
officials it can damage the relations between US and Azerbaijan.
The WikiLeaks on Azerbaijan were interesting in that there were two sets
of leaks that will effect Azerbaijan's public perception.
The first set of important leaks is the US officials in Baku comparing
President Ilham Aliyev to the "Godfather", saying that "the Aliyev
administration has developed an 'organised crime' image in some quarters,
leading some analysts to see Ilham Aliyev at times in a mafia-like role."
This is a definite blast against the leadership in Azerbaijan at a time
when the U.S. State department was already struggling with getting an
Ambassador sent to Baku. So this leak could be another sign to Baku of the
U.S.'s lack of taking Azerbaijan seriously. Interestingly, this
terminology of comparing leaders to the mafia has been seen in may of the
cables concerning former Soviet states, giving the impression that the
State Department perhaps does not understand how governments in the region
operate.
The other set of leaks that STRATFOR finds interesting is those where
President Aliyev discusses Baku's balance of powers in the region. How
Azerbaijan is not against normalizing relations with Armenia pending a
resolution on Nagorn-Karabakh, but how Russia isn't playing the a negative
role in the process. Also, how Baku isn't tied to Ankara. Such leaks are a
sign that Azerbaijan isn't solely dependent on the U.S. or Turkey and does
have a constructive relationship with Russia. Such leaks reinforce to the
U.S. that it can not dictate Azerbaijan's future, since Baku does have
options of other major players in the region to leverage into a better
relationship with Washington.
On 12/3/10 3:38 AM, Zaur Hasanov wrote:
Hey Lauren
Hope you are fine.
We are also thinking on wikileaks in Azerbaijan. What's your take on it,
I mean of Stratfor?
Do you see in a purposeful leak by US officials or it is happened
really?
Also what do you think Azerbaijan can expect from the leak? There are
tons of stories not published yet. The leak already irritates officials
here. If wikileak will continue to publish stories about high ranking
officials it can damage the relations between US and Azerbaijan.
Have a good day, Zaur
--
Lauren Goodrich
Senior Eurasia Analyst
STRATFOR
T: 512.744.4311
F: 512.744.4334
lauren.goodrich@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com