The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2689
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14
2012-09-16
2012-09-17

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Fw: [alpha] S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions blast in Iran

Released on 2012-03-08 09:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1588898
Date | 2011-11-14 16:00:18
From | burton@stratfor.com
To | bokhari@stratfor.com, sean.noonan@stratfor.com

I captured Ramzi Yousef on a single piece of intel and you will never see
the killer that I had killed in Shadows show up in the OS. Relying on the
OS as corroboration makes us no better then CNN. Also, Comrade J told me
that the KGB takes great pride in killing Zia...
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Kamran Bokhari <bokhari@stratfor.com>
Sender: alpha-bounces@stratfor.com
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:22:18 -0600 (CST)
To: <alpha@stratfor.com>
ReplyTo: Alpha List <alpha@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: [alpha] S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions blast in
Iran
As an intelligence entity we can't simply accept a single piece of insight
as truth.
On 11/14/11 9:10 AM, Fred Burton wrote:
Guerrilla actions behind enemy lines.
If we think the Izzies have set back waiting on Iran to create a bomb we
are like the CIA with their inability to predict just about anything.
Check INSIGHT I posted last week that everyone discounted. How come if
its not in OS we nash our teeth? Intelligence agencies exist to have
sources. That is what we are.
On 11/14/2011 8:06 AM, Kamran Bokhari wrote:
Penetrating a major military installation and causing a blast is a
totally different ballgame. Not saying it can't happen. But we can't
assume that because they did stuxnet that they are capable of doing
this blast as well. It is a huge leap in capabilities.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Sean Noonan" <sean.noonan@stratfor.com>
Sender: alpha-bounces@stratfor.com
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:03:34 -0600 (CST)
To: Alpha List<alpha@stratfor.com>
ReplyTo: Alpha List <alpha@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: [alpha] S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions blast
in Iran
It clearly does not. Look at the thousand centrifuges. Please reread
the 2 stuxnet analyses.
There are enough iranians who have aliyah'd to israel that they could
easily train a persian looking, farsi speaking jew to go into Iran for
sabotage and not get caught. I don't know that this is happening nor
do I assume that there would not be mistakes, but its very possible to
do this undetected. The key is recruiting human agents on the bases.
This was clearly done with stuxnet, though it may have been
unknowingly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Kamran Bokhari" <bokhari@stratfor.com>
Sender: alpha-bounces@stratfor.com
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:59:47 -0600 (CST)
To: Alpha List<alpha@stratfor.com>
ReplyTo: Alpha List <alpha@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: [alpha] S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions blast
in Iran
Yeah this seems really unlikely. '79 was a whole different reality.
The security establishment has the placed locked down.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Abe Selig <abe.selig@stratfor.com>
Sender: alpha-bounces@stratfor.com
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:45:14 -0600 (CST)
To: Alpha List<alpha@stratfor.com>
ReplyTo: Alpha List <alpha@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: [alpha] S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions blast
in Iran
There are still about 20,000 Jews in Iran (Tehran and Esfahan mostly),
but IMO, they are far too scared of being accused as Israeli spies too
actually help Israel out.
On 11/14/11 7:32 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
Ah. As stick said, they would more likely use proxies. But if
not, special operations forces do often move undetected. Don't
think of them as going in on a helicopter, think of them as going in
with a group of migrant workers crossing the border. There used to
be a lot of jews in Iran, not so much anymore, that's who I would
recruit form.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Kamran Bokhari" <bokhari@stratfor.com>
To: "Alpha List" <alpha@stratfor.com>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 7:11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [alpha] S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions
blast in Iran
See insight below.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sean Noonan <sean.noonan@stratfor.com>
Sender: alpha-bounces@stratfor.com
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:10:06 -0600 (CST)
To: Alpha List<alpha@stratfor.com>
ReplyTo: Alpha List <alpha@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: [alpha] S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions
blast in Iran
what commandos?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Kamran Bokhari" <bokhari@stratfor.com>
To: "Alpha List" <alpha@stratfor.com>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 6:39:07 AM
Subject: Re: [alpha] S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions
blast in Iran
How did Israeli commandos get to operate deep inside Iran without
being detected?
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sean Noonan <sean.noonan@stratfor.com>
Sender: alpha-bounces@stratfor.com
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:54:41 -0600 (CST)
To: Alpha List<alpha@stratfor.com>
ReplyTo: Alpha List <alpha@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: [alpha] S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions
blast in Iran
I agree. The argument here is that the proponents of conventional
war are ones that want the oil prices--but is it really that
simple? What about other economic effects? For Israel, by this
argument, it doesn't matter what method as long as it sets Iran
back----I agree with this. However, the confidence that this guy
has does not show publicly. By that, I mean look at what Dagan was
saying a year ago, and how quiet Israeli leaders have been.
Suddenly they are really pushing the issue, and while Dagan isn't
it, his line is that conventional war would be a mistake, not that
Iran doesn't need to be dealt with. I don't really like trying to
interpret public statements, but I think there is something here,
and that's why I keep pushing this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Chris Farnham" <chris.farnham@stratfor.com>
To: "Alpha List" <alpha@stratfor.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 7:22:52 PM
Subject: Re: [alpha] S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions
blast in Iran
I think the info that Fred sent in previously needs to be looked
quite seriously here.
The insight seems like quite a stretch however it has been put out
there for some reason or another and is now playing in to what we
are seeing.
Insight below:
Source below was asked to clarify his remarks that the nuclear
infrastructure had been destroyed. Source response:
Israeli commandos in collaboration with Kurd forces destroyed few
underground facilities mainly used for the Iranian defense and
nuclear research projects.
Despite the reports in the media and against any public knowledge,
the promoter of a massive Israeli attack on Syria is the axis
India-Russia-Turkey-Saudi Arabia. The axis US-Germany-France-China
is against such an attack from obvious reasons. Not many people know
that Russia is one of Israel's largest military partners and India
is Israel's largest client.
If a direct conflict between Iran and Israel erupts, Russia and
Saudi Arabia will gain the advantages on oil increasing prices. On
the other hand, China and Europe are expected to loose from an oil
crisis as a result of a conflict. Based on Israeli plans, the attack
on Iran will last only 48 hours but will be so destructive that Iran
will be unable to retaliate or recover and the government will fall.
It is hard to believe that Hamas or Hezbollah will try to get
involved in this conflict.
In the open media many are pushing and expecting Israel to launch a
massive attack on Iran. Even if the Israelis have the capabilities
and are ready to attack by air, sea and land, there is no need to
attack the nuclear program at this point after the commandos
destroyed a significant part of it.
If a massive attack on Iran happens soon, then the attack will have
political and oil reasons and not nuclear. It is also very hard to
believe that the Israelis will initiate an attack unless they act as
a contractor for other nations or if Iran or its proxies attack
first. With the revealed of the new UN report the Israelis have
green light to take care of the Iranian proxies in Gaza and Lebanon
now with the entire world watching Iran. I think that we should
expect escalations on these fronts rather than an Israeli attack on
Iran.
On 11/7/11 8:09 AM, Chris Farnham wrote: Ah, what? Israel has
already destroyed the Iranian prog/infra and this is all being
engineered by Europeans so people forget about the economy crisis?!
How and when did the Israelis destroy the infra on the ground?
Why is that we see the vast majority of the increase in pressure
coming from Israel (I mean straight from people's mouths) and from
the US (Such as Albright in the WaPo)?
Would anyone actually accept that this could let the Europeans
forget about the Euro crisis, something they have been experiencing
every day for over a year?!
Do we attribute any credibility to this item at all? I don't even
see what possible disinfo purposes this could serve.
On 11/7/11 7:54 AM, Benjamin Preisler wrote:
Code: IL701
Publication: for background
Attribution: none
Source Description - Confirmed Israeli Intelligence Agent
Source reliability: Still testing
Item credibility: untested
Source handler: Fred
Source was asked what he thought of reports that the Israelis were
preparing a military offensive against Iran. Response:
I think this is a diversion. The Israelis already destroyed all
the Iranian nuclear infrastructure on the ground weeks ago. The
current "let's bomb Iran" campaign was ordered by the EU leaders
to divert the public attention from their at home financial
problems. It plays also well for the US since Pakistan, Russia
and N. Korea are mentioned in the report.
The result of this campaign will be massive attacks on Gaza and
strikes on Hezbollah in both Lebanon and Syria.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Reva Bhalla" <bhalla@stratfor.com>
To: analysts@stratfor.com
Sent: Monday, 14 November, 2011 11:52:04 AM
Subject: Re: S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions blast in
Iran
wow, that's an extremely revealing statement. The Israelis (i
believe it was even Barak then too) made very similar comments
following the Stuxnet news as well. THe whole 'I'm not going to
admit publicly that we did it, but boy that was nice.'
i think we need a piece laying out the details as far as we know of
what happened and where and point out the holes in the accident
theory. i think our assessment on the constraints of an Israeli
attack on Iranian sites holds. It's the sabotage efforts where the
most resources are being concentrated, which makes a lot of
strategic and tactical sense for Israel and US in dealing with Iran
at this stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Ben West" <ben.west@stratfor.com>
To: "alerts" <alerts@stratfor.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 2:40:06 PM
Subject: S3/G3* ISRAEL/IRAN - Barak hails munitions blast in Iran
Interesting comments by the defense minister.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i28MvYyqR9sGxc2cZ4U1QlPPQFLA?docId=CNG.93c1b5af9b6cb71a17bf389563809eb2.a1
Israel hails deadly blast in Iran
(AFP) - 1 hour ago
JERUSALEM - Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak on Sunday hailed the
deadly munitions blast at a base of Iran's elite Revolutionary
Guards and hoped for more such incidents.
"I don't know the extent of the explosion," he told military radio,
asked about the incident. "But it would be desirable if they
multiply."
Iran said earlier that a senior general who pioneered an artillery
and missile unit was among the 17 Guards reported killed in
Saturday's blast at Bid Ganeh, near the town of Malard on the
western outskirts of Tehran.
Guards spokesman commander Ramezan Sharif said the blast, which Iran
said was an accident, occurred as "ammunition was taken out of the
depot and was being moved outside toward the appropriate site."
Set up after the 1979 Islamic revolution to defend Iran, the Guards
are in charge of the Islamic republic's missile programme, including
Shahab-3 missiles with a range of 2,000 kilometres (1,200 miles)
capable of hitting Israel.
Saturday's blast came amid international condemnation of Iran since
the release of a new UN nuclear watchdog report accusing Tehran of
working towards the development of nuclear warheads to fit inside
its medium-range missiles.
Israeli officials have in past weeks warned Iran of the possibility
of military strikes against its nuclear sites.
Ben West
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
512-744-4300
ext. 4340
--
Chris Farnham
Senior Watch Officer, STRATFOR
Australia Mobile: 0423372241
Email: chris.farnham@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
T: +1 512-279-9479 | M: +1 512-758-5967
www.STRATFOR.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
T: +1 512-279-9479 | M: +1 512-758-5967
www.STRATFOR.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
T: +1 512-279-9479 | M: +1 512-758-5967
www.STRATFOR.com
--
-
Abe Selig
Officer, Operations Center
STRATFOR
T: 512.279.9489 | M: 512.574.3846
www.STRATFOR.com