The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2615
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11
2012-09-12
2012-09-13
2012-09-14

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Re: Dealing with the Turks

Released on 2012-03-03 08:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1457112
Date | 2010-09-01 17:47:15
From | reva.bhalla@stratfor.com
To | mfriedman@stratfor.com, gfriedman@stratfor.com, bhalla@stratfor.com, bokhari@stratfor.com, friedman@att.blackberry.net, emre.dogru@stratfor.com

ok, let us know how you want to use the lever of our charging them with
falsifying what we said. is that something you prefer to handle directly?
On Sep 1, 2010, at 10:45 AM, George Friedman wrote:
Ok. There are others we can approach for this. But I want to smooth the
relation with zaman and use the lever of our charging them with
falsifying what we said. I want to explore a counter at the heart of our
critics.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Reva Bhalla <reva.bhalla@stratfor.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:43:19 -0500 (CDT)
To: <friedman@att.blackberry.net>
Cc: Emre Dogru<emre.dogru@stratfor.com>; Kamran
Bokhari<bokhari@stratfor.com>; Reva Bhalla<bhalla@stratfor.com>; George
Friedman<gfriedman@stratfor.com>; Meredith
Friedman<mfriedman@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with the Turks
Bulent Kenes is in charge of Today's Zaman - English language. Ali Aslan
is in charge of Zaman - Turkish language. Both are Zaman.
On Sep 1, 2010, at 10:42 AM, George Friedman wrote:
Hold on. Who is ali and who is bulent. So far I only authorized
contact with zaman.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Reva Bhalla <reva.bhalla@stratfor.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:40:15 -0500
To: <friedman@att.blackberry.net>
Cc: Emre Dogru<emre.dogru@stratfor.com>; Kamran
Bokhari<bokhari@stratfor.com>; Reva Bhalla<bhalla@stratfor.com>;
George Friedman<gfriedman@stratfor.com>; Meredith
Friedman<mfriedman@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with the Turks
that's good. will add that to the email response.
if Bulent is saying no, Ali will probably say no as well. im still
waiting for his response.
Emre, Ali wanted to know which of his contacts we met with in Turkey,
so it doesn't surprise me that he and Bulent are coordinating and
exchanging emails on this. Ali was also trying to get us to issue a
retraction.
On Sep 1, 2010, at 10:37 AM, George Friedman wrote:
Further thoughts.
Turkey has no better or influential friend than stratfor in the
united states. We are not seeking a breach with the movement but
will defend ourselves. We can do it in a dialog form if he wishes.
I would say something like that.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "George Friedman" <friedman@att.blackberry.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:34:55 +0000
To: Emre Dogru<emre.dogru@stratfor.com>
ReplyTo: friedman@att.blackberry.net
Cc: Reva Bhalla<reva.bhalla@stratfor.com>; Kamran
Bokhari<bokhari@stratfor.com>; Reva Bhalla<bhalla@stratfor.com>;
George Friedman<gfriedman@stratfor.com>; Meredith
Friedman<mfriedman@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with the Turks
Remember that we have credibility in turkey. Would it help if I
spoke to him?
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Emre Dogru <emre.dogru@stratfor.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:31:54 -0500 (CDT)
To: <friedman@att.blackberry.net>
Cc: Reva Bhalla<reva.bhalla@stratfor.com>; Kamran
Bokhari<bokhari@stratfor.com>; Reva Bhalla<bhalla@stratfor.com>;
George Friedman<gfriedman@stratfor.com>; Meredith
Friedman<mfriedman@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with the Turks
I was on the phone with Bulent Kenes, editor-in-chief of Today's
Zaman, for quite a while. I explained him the situation and your
purpose. Briefly, he said they will not publish a letter or article
that you would write. He suggests us to write another article and
correct mistakes that we did, send it to all our clients and "all
concerned". They will greatly cite that in their newspaper if we do
this. He says he frankly thinks that they deserve an apology due to
the "negative taste" of the report. None of the things that they
told us in our meeting was included in the report.
Between the lines, I told him that we never defined Gulen movement
as fundamental violent organization. He said it was Abdulhamit's
piece and not his.
He was pretty nice and talkative, just tried to convince me. My
personal opinion is that trying to reach out to them shows our
willingness to maintain dialogue and we're fine like this. Btw Reva,
Ali Aslan told (or forwarded) the things that you wrote him to
Bulent and Abdulhamit. Especially the parts that you got information
from them during our meeting.
George Friedman wrote:
Yes. I want to at least have it on record that we tried to have
dialogue. Use my name and no one elses. I want to write a piece.
Make it clear I am not angry. Just misunderstood.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Emre Dogru <emre.dogru@stratfor.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:48:27 +0300
To: <friedman@att.blackberry.net>
Cc: Reva Bhalla<reva.bhalla@stratfor.com>; Kamran
Bokhari<bokhari@stratfor.com>; Reva Bhalla<bhalla@stratfor.com>;
George Friedman<gfriedman@stratfor.com>; Meredith
Friedman<mfriedman@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with the Turks
Sabah would not want to take side by us against Zaman. They would
prefer not to get involved in this. They are close to the
government and government is close to Gulen movement. They don't
want media quarrel.
Btw, not sure if I included in the quick translation but
Abdulhamit says we said Sabah was an Islamist newspaper.
I can contact zaman or even Abdulhamit if you'd like.
George Friedman wrote:
We don't want a neutral forum. We would like the most rabid
gulenist forum. If they will give it to us. Emre, how do you
feel about contacting zaman and saying I would like to explain
stratfor's position there.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Reva Bhalla <reva.bhalla@stratfor.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:43:18 -0500
To: Emre Dogru<emre.dogru@stratfor.com>
Cc: <friedman@att.blackberry.net>; Kamran
Bokhari<bokhari@stratfor.com>; Reva Bhalla<bhalla@stratfor.com>;
George Friedman<gfriedman@stratfor.com>; Meredith
Friedman<mfriedman@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with the Turks
wouldn't Sabah be a more neutral forum?
On Sep 1, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Emre Dogru wrote:
I don't know if they would publish one in the Turkish Zaman.
Today's Zaman is more liberal than the Turkish one, it could
publish your letter. But I think it would be good idea to ask
them before you write it.
You are right, Hurriyet is not a good idea. We can easily
become a tool in their fight.
George Friedman wrote:
Emre, would they publish one? If they did I would want a
week for all the nuts to come out. I don't want it in
hurriyet.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Kamran Bokhari <bokhari@stratfor.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:35:28 -0500 (CDT)
To: Reva Bhalla<bhalla@stratfor.com>
Cc: Emre
Dogru<emre.dogru@stratfor.com>; <friedman@att.blackberry.net>;
George Friedman<gfriedman@stratfor.com>; Meredith
Friedman<mfriedman@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with the Turks
I think George should write an op-ed and publish it in
Zaman.
On 9/1/2010 10:32 AM, Reva Bhalla wrote:
We never once described Gulen as 'violent' or 'radical' or
anything close to that.
Would we be able to do a rebuttal in Sabah? or would that
be a bad idea?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Emre Dogru" <emre.dogru@stratfor.com>
To: "Kamran Bokhari" <bokhari@stratfor.com>
Cc: "Reva
Bhalla" <reva.bhalla@stratfor.com>, friedman@att.blackberry.net,
"George Friedman"<gfriedman@stratfor.com>, "Meredith
Friedman" <mfriedman@stratfor.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2010 9:29:48 AM
Subject: Re: Dealing with the Turks
Here is what Abdulhamit Bilici says (btw, he was present
in the break-room before George gave lecture in Istanbul
conference hall, the short, bald guy)
Title: Strategic Scratch/defamation
An American researcher, Reva Bhalla, came to visit us few
weeks ago. Asked many questions about Gulenist schools,
referendum etc. We answered her questions and suggested
her to meet with opponents as well to see broader picture.
When I received the report, I noticed even though we've
told that the real struggle is between those who are eager
to maintain the statusquo and those who want change, they
built the entire report on Islamist - Secularist debate.
(He gives here names of Turkish intellectuals from
different nationalities and religions and says that if it
would be true, these people would be Islamist as well)
There are many faults when it comes to its objectivity. It
includes "violent radical Islamist" to define Gulen
movement as extreme opponents use. Report says Gulen
supports dialogue between religions abroad, and promotes
Islam at home. Isn't it interesting that it doesn't say
anything that could be in favor of Gulen in the West. No
mention about Gulen's meetings with Pope.
The report could mention "Abant Platform" (a conference
that Gulen movement organizes and gathers many people from
a wide specturm) to show that we make different people
come together. The report didn't say that Gulen said he
hates Bin Laden, (published on Zaman) because it could
show Gulen positive?
There are many errors; Turkish schools were shut down in
n. Iraq, Gulen praised new Turkish intel chief Fidan, a
Bank changed its name. Many many lies and allegations
without evidence.
Stratfor, which drew attention by showing Turkey as a
leader country in the future and founded by G Friedman,
needs to think what to do with all these lies..
Kamran Bokhari wrote:
Btw, Hurriyet putting your name on the shorter piece
could just be an error or something they just did as per
their SOP. A few years ago, the Pakistani daily, The
News, published one of our regular analyses with my
byline and even slapped a picture of me on it. It's
never happened again because whenever I share any of our
material with anyone I put the following disclaimer up
on top and in bold:
Please do not republish without permission. STRATFOR
reports in general are the product of a collaborative
effort on the part of our analytical group and not the
work of a single analyst. Therefore, should you need to
quote from this or any of our other analyses that do not
carry a byline, please refer to it as *STRATFOR says...*
Thank you.
On 9/1/2010 9:42 AM, Emre Dogru wrote:
Bulent Kenes, editor in chief of Today's Zaman also
criticized the piece before it was published by
Hurriyet. I asked him what facts does he disagree with
and how he would portray the current situation. He did
not respond, because he simply did not have anything
to say against the facts.
Reva Bhalla wrote:
Falsifying what facts? Not a single one of these
guys has produced any evidence to the contrary. Now
they're all hell bent on making us look like an
Israeli agent just because we are the only ones who
have discussed the Gulen in detail.
I'm going to send out a draft email that I've been
composing to respond to emails like this so we can
all be on the same page and deliver the same, firm
response. These guys really think they can dictate
everything we write.
On Sep 1, 2010, at 8:30 AM, Kamran Bokhari wrote:
One of my Turkish contacts in the U.S., a Gulenist
sent me the following note this morning:
Salam;
It seems that you're not preparing reports on
Turkey at Stratfor's anymore. It's unbelievable
that the report prepared by Reva Bhalla is
published by Stratfor despite you. There is
nothing to be gained from falsifying the facts. If
Stratfor is an institution like WINEP, this is
understandable. You have responsibility toward
your clients to portray a picture of a country
close to the facts. It seems that Reva Bhalla's
report is not prepared by this sense of
responsibility.
What is strange is that he doesn't know Reva.
Also, he has seen many of our previous reports
Turkey but never once complained. I guess he
wasn't expecting one on the Gulen movement.
On 9/1/2010 9:22 AM, George Friedman wrote:
I'm sorry hurriyet published your name but
stratfor publishes what it thinks is correct.
There is no flexibility on our part on this.
Once we start to bend very far on this, we are
finished. I will be having more substantial
pressure I'm sure. So be it.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Emre Dogru <emre.dogru@stratfor.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:19:44 -0500 (CDT)
To: Reva Bhalla<reva.bhalla@stratfor.com>
Cc: George Friedman<gfriedman@stratfor.com>;
Kamran Bokhari<bokhari@stratfor.com>; Meredith
Friedman<mfriedman@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with the Turks
I will add my thoughts here. But before that, I
need to inform you that our Hurriyet Daily News
partners re-published our article on AKP -
Gulenist split
(http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=turkey-an-emerging-akp-gulenist-split-2010-08-31),
by referring my name and role at Stratfor. This
could further complicate the things that Reva
laid out below. For your information, I always
forward our articles on Turkey to our partners
and some people that I know. HDN did not inform
me that they would re-publish our article and
mention my name. Please let me know what we are
supposed to do now.
Apart from this, Gulenists got over-concerned
following our special report given their already
tarnishing image in the US. We've been closely
following AKP's efforts to reverse this
situation. However, we are an American company
and we wrote in detail on how Gulen community
works and their relationship to the AKP. They
don't have anything to say against the facts
that we included, because we wrote the truth.
But as Reva says, the mere fact that we wrote
about them and how they work disturbed them
intensely.
They won't be happy unless we take their side.
So, I don't think that we need to work to make
them happy. They are extremely skeptical to us
because we are American, and I'm sure they
wonder if there is an American plan in the works
against Gulen and AKP and if we are a part of
it. I think what we need to do is to convince
them that there is no such a thing and we write
what we know, without taking side by anyone.
This could help us to maintain our
relationships. Guidance would be much
appreciated, especially given HDN re-published
our article.
Thanks,
Emre
Reva Bhalla wrote:
Just want to keep everyone informed on the
feedback we're getting from the Gulenists on
the power struggle report since they are
becoming a bit of an issue and since G is
going to be in Turkey soon.
So far, feedback from the secularists,
military and moderate AKP types has been good.
The more extreme Gulenists (for example, the
editor of Today's Zaman and the US head of
Tuskon business group) are not happy with us.
It's quite clear that they were lovey dovey
with Emre and I in Turkey because they
intended for us to write out their propaganda
and describe Gulen solely as a 'peace-loving,
democratic and pro-reform human rights
organization.' The Gulenists are also on the
defensive right now with the release of a new
book in Turkey by a former police chief that
details their infiltration into police
intelligence. They are being extremely
defensive about any Islamist connotation
attached to them, and are flat out denying
their infiltration of any of the security
agencies.
We had credible sourcing for this report,
including a former Gulenist who walked me
through the recruitment process. Since this
stuff isn't discussed in English language,
they are naturally uncomfortable with it being
published. None of the Gulenists who are
criticizing the report have presented
counter-evidence to anything we've said yet
and are sticking mainly to polemic arguments.
Notably, the Today's Zaman counterargument
that was published was quite tame.
Now, these guys are difficult to deal with,
but it's important for them to realize they
need us just as it is important for us to keep
open a channel with Gulen to keep information
coming. I've been trying to work out some
sort of damage control plan to make clear to
them that Stratfor is not interested in taking
sides in this power struggle, is an
influential player in the US-Turkey
relationship and how it behooves both sides to
continue working with each other. George, do
you have any guidance on how to handle this so
we can maintain these relationships? The
Gulenists can get really nasty if you get on
their bad side, and i want to avoid that.
Thanks,
R
--
Emre Dogru
STRATFOR
Cell: +90.532.465.7514
Fixed: +1.512.279.9468
emre.dogru@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Emre Dogru
STRATFOR
Cell: +90.532.465.7514
Fixed: +1.512.279.9468
emre.dogru@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Emre Dogru
STRATFOR
Cell: +90.532.465.7514
Fixed: +1.512.279.9468
emre.dogru@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Emre Dogru
STRATFOR
Cell: +90.532.465.7514
Fixed: +1.512.279.9468
emre.dogru@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Emre Dogru
STRATFOR
Cell: +90.532.465.7514
Fixed: +1.512.279.9468
emre.dogru@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Emre Dogru
STRATFOR
Cell: +90.532.465.7514
Fixed: +1.512.279.9468
emre.dogru@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com