The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2569
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Re: [CT] DISCUSSION GERMANY/CT-The Story Behind Germany's Terror Threat

Released on 2012-08-12 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 2007893
Date | 2010-11-22 20:16:23
From | sean.noonan@stratfor.com
To | ct@stratfor.com, eurasia@stratfor.com
List-Name | ct@stratfor.com

including Eurasia on this one.
Where else do germans get weapons?
On 11/22/10 1:13 PM, Ben West wrote:
Interesting parts I think are facts that balkan criminals were
implicated in smuggilng weapons and that Dawood Ibrahim was also
implicated. Lots of shady stuff comes out of the Balkans, so getting
weapons to Germany from there would be no easy task.
Also, I'm not sure what role Dawood would play in this scenario.
Remember Indian officials blamed him for working with naxalites a few
months back but didn't offer much evidence. He's an all around south
asian bogeyman - any reference to him sends a clear message that
somebody is up to no good.
On 11/22/2010 1:01 PM, Jaclyn Blumenfeld wrote:
Here are some of the thoughts and inconsistencies I found - I had
summarized the der spiegel to pick out the bits I found important and
added some info from other OS articles in blue.
-Call from abroad (likely Pakistan) from "Nova" a terrorist wanting to
surrender and return to his family in Germany
-now working with German Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) and was
reason behind threat increase on Wednesday, so far three calls have
taken place between "Nova" and BKA
-warned of small group attacking Reichstag on Monday and security has
since been increased, authorities are secretly monitoring
communications, conducting surveillance operations and launching
undercover investigations.
According to "NOVA":
-AQ and associate groups (Pakistan's Islamic Jihad Group) planning
together in Pakistan for attack(s) in Germany.
-One idea was to remotely detonate a bomb using a mobile phone.
Another called for a small group of terrorists to storm the Reichstag
with guns blazing, take hostages and end everything in one calamitous
bloodbath.
-Plan called for the terrorists to procure the submachine guns,
automatic rifles, explosives and whatever else they would need in the
Balkans.
-He said that two men had already traveled to Germany six to eight
weeks earlier, adding that one had the nom de guerre of "Abu Mohammed"
and that the other one was a German of Turkish origin
-Both apparently had roots in the Greater Berlin metropolitan area,
were currently unemployed and living off of welfare payments and had
immersed themselves in the anonymity provided by a major city -- until
the time should come for their activation.
-Four others involved were waiting to travel to Germany at training
camps in Pakistan - including a German, a Turk, a North African and
another jihadist of unknown identity
-Attack slated for February or March (if German intel had this
knowledge why would they close the Reichstag today? are they sending a
statement to AQ and affiliate group that they are aware and ahead of
the planning?)
According to FBI (which was recieved shortly before the call from
"Nova" (there are some inconsistencies between the intelligence)
- FBI included warnings about the obscure Indian group "Saif" which
although Shiite had allegedly made pact with AQ and sent five men to
Pakistan for training - what the connection to the Germany plot not
specified - the 6 members described in the Reichstag plot were
described by caller as various nationalities - none Indian)
-FBI also shared that two members with visas allowing them to travel
freely in EU schengen zone were already enroute to Germany and would
enter via UAE on Nov 22 (compared to caller saying that two had
already entered two weeks prior - time gap - so maybe there are four
now in Germany unless FBI intel was outdated and the men came earlier
- or caller was not accurate?)
-FBI warnings claim the two in Germany were dispatched by Dawood
Ibrahim Kaskar, an Indian organised crime baron linked to al-Qaeda
based out of Karachi (this seems out of place - two mentions by the
FBI of an Indian connection)
-One of the men is supposedly named "Khan" (versus caller's info he
was named Abu Muhammed and the second guy was of Turkish descent -
Khan is not Turkish, Khan and Abu Muhammed could be the same guy
though)
Ben West wrote:
Europeans have still found a way to blame Americans for warnings in
the past.
And yes, something very well could be in the works, but given the
fact that jihadists constantly want to attack the west, is it really
at all significant that something is in the works?
I think we'd seen past plots with travel plans... I'd have to look
harder to get specifics, but I don't think that's all that novel.
Agree that the security officials are in a catch-22 situation.
On 11/22/2010 11:43 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
There is a notable difference here. And that is the German
warning issued last week. It was based on their own intelligence
not American intelligence--so no blaming americans this time.
Yes, it's true that they don't have the capability to attack the
Reichstag, and theat the attack is not imminent, as I pointed
out. But on the other hand, like with cargo parcels, it doesn't
mean that something is not in the works. Have we ever seen
information this specific before on the individuals and their
travel plans?
This is the conundrum of warning intelligence, when the warning
is given (just to policymakers, or to the public), measures are
taken that prevent it. It then comes the boy-who-cried-wolf, even
if the warning was originally accurate.
Not to mention, given what happened with the last double agent to
become public (Khost), it will be interesting to follow this one.
On 11/22/10 11:33 AM, Ben West wrote:
I agree that the spiegel article was good - but this is the kind
of thing we've seen over and over again in Europe. Source from
durkastan says that aq is going to target Europe and kill lots
of people and that attackers are en route. Everyone gets freaked
out. Nothing significant happens. Europe blames US of scare
mongering.
Certainly islamists have europe in their cross-hairs, but if an
attack is going to happen, it's not going be preceded by this
kind of publicity.
Also, attacking the reichstag? I mean, it's possible to ATTACK
it, but they've got a pretty heavy security presence there that
would prevent a hostage situation. I was there a few years ago.
The public entryway is confined to one doorway with a heavy
guard presence, metal detectors, x-ray machines, etc. If
anything, an attack could kill lots of tourists lined up
outside, but it would take a very serious force to be able to
gain entrance to the reichstag and an even more well trained
force to actually hold hostages. This sounds like a pipe-dream
to me.
On 11/22/2010 11:04 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
thoughts?
On 11/22/10 11:00 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
It is up to you and CT how you approach this. On the
short-term, this looks like something you can handle without
me. If you want to dabble in the more long-term view of what
is going on here, I would love to help.
On 11/22/10 10:58 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
In the more long-term, I think an analysis of the German
intelligence agencies would be good too. They have been
pretty decimated by the Cold War and by all the problems
associated with running an intelligence agency in a
post-Gestapo country. If Germany is ever going to become a
world power again, however, they would need to overcome
these deamons as well. That is sort of the last straw for
Germany, the one that is going to be most sensitive to
overcome. But perhaps this case may illustrate how they
are already overcoming these issues.
On 11/22/10 10:50 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
Main problem is that Der Spiegel is just that good,
they've at least touched on most of what I would want to
say about it. The main thing here is how the politics
of a terror threat/alert coincide with the reality of
the threat itself.
We saw that Germany was fairly relaxed bout the earlier
threat in Europe released by the US. I'm not sure if
that was the same as the info that the FBI passed over
about this shia group, Saif (I don't know anything about
them). But something changed, as we noted last week in
their interpretation. That seems to go down to this
virtual walk-in. The one thing I was left confused
about is whether BKA had ever been in contact with this
source before. It sounds like he cold called them.
It's common knowledge that walk-ins, rather than
recruits, are nearly always the best sources. But at
the same time, they are very suspicious as double
agents. If this was a US source they would be freaking
the fuck out after having Al-Balawi turn on them. The
germans seem to have cooler heads, but they will be
working 24/7 to verify the source (let me make another
plug for John Lecarre's A Most Wanted Man here, most of
his career was in Germany).
They've clearly got enough corroborating information
that they consider this a real threat. But politically
they are faced with the universal 'damned if you do,
damned if you don't' alert problem. If the Interior
ministry doesn't say something, they will be liable if
an attack occurs. Look at the constant press over
information on the warning intelligence for Mumbai. As
we've said before, simply issuing the warning may help
to deter the attackers.
The real important bit here, is that it seems the
germans have fairly good intelligence. While this
attack is still not happening tomorrow, they have a lot
of details about what might be in the works, rather than
a single-source intercept that indicates some vague
threat. It seems they've increased security pretty well
at the Bundestag, and want to add to the presence at any
possible target. This is where we seem them scrambling,
and where their intelligence holes are.
The task now for the germans is to verify this source.
Maybe even pick him up and put him on ice somewhere
(Fred/Stick?), not in GErmany but in
Pakistan/Afghanistan. That will require some
cooperation with either/both the Americans and
Pakistanis. They also need to verify all the bio
information they have on these 4-6 guys trying to get
into germany and watch travelers very carefully. The
germans seem to be very good at surveilling these
threats within Germany, so their best luck may come when
one of the guys overseas contacts a local already under
surveillance.
At minimum, this could be a pretty interesting tearline
this week. Both the walk-in issues and the CIA/FBI
liaison conflicts that I havne't gotten into here.
On 11/22/10 10:34 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
Any thoughts on where you guys are thinking of going
with this?
Der Spiegel article is indeed interesting.
On 11/22/10 9:28 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
Great report from Der Spiegel (thanks Mikey). I
suggest anyone interested to read the whole thing.
They ask the right questions, and while not as much
detail as I hoped, give us a much better
understanding on the threat in Germany.
The BKA (germany's FBI) must be extremely busy
verifying the details of this virtual walk-in. It
obviously caused the germans to shit their pants.
But the real questions are buried in the
article---how real was this plot, how real is the
source, is the source just trying to get back to the
land of brezeln and bier? Trying to double-cross
them somehow?
Also note the tip off from the FBI (cue fred), not
the usual CIA liaison with BND.
For Eurasia, there's a lot in here on the internal
politics of the interior minister position, and the
relation between state and federal government.
On 11/22/10 8:55 AM, Michael Wilson wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [OS] GERMANY/CT-The Story Behind
Germany's Terror Threat
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:38:21 -0600
From: Graham Smith <graham.smith@stratfor.com>
Reply-To: The OS List <os@stratfor.com>
To: os@stratfor.com
11/22/2010 11:38 AM
Fears of a Mumbai Redux
The Story Behind Germany's Terror Threat
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,730377,00.html
By Matthias Bartsch, Yassin Musharbash and Holger
Stark
Germany is currently in a state of high alert.
Security officials are warning that they have
concrete information pointing to a possible terror
attack on the federal parliament building in
Berlin, a massively popular tourist attraction.
The days of Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere's
reserved stances in dealing with such warnings
appear to be over.
The call came from abroad, and the man speaking
hurriedly on the other end of the line sounded as
if he feared for his life. He wanted out, he told
the officers of the German Federal Criminal Police
Office (BKA) -- out of the terrorist scene. He
wanted to come back to Germany, back to his
family. Then he asked if German officials could
help him.
Right now, they're trying to do just that. The BKA
is pursuing the case under the codename "Nova."
The apparently remorseful man could be an
important possible whistleblower from a dangerous
region of the globe. In fact, he is also the most
recent reason why German Interior Minister Thomas
de Maiziere put the entire country in a state of
fright on Wednesday.
During a hastily called press conference that day,
de Maiziere stated that Germany faced the threat
of terrorist attacks that might be launched
against the country at some point in November. As
he put it, Germany is "presently dealing with a
new situation."
Just two days earlier, the source had called for
the third time in just a short period and provided
more information. He told officials that a small
group of terrorists wanted to conduct a raid on
the Reichstag building in Berlin, which houses the
federal parliament, and that that was only one of
the targets included in their attack plans.
Germany on High Alert
Since then, Germany has been in a state of high
alert. The Reichstag is surrounded with barricades
and its popular cupola tourist attraction
temporarily closed to visitors. Police armed with
submachine guns are patrolling major railway
stations and airports. And vacations have been
called off for officials at the country's security
agencies. Wherever they have cause for doing so,
the authorities are secretly monitoring
communications, conducting surveillance operations
and launching undercover investigations. At the
moment, investigators seem to be at a loss; their
modus operandi: "We'll prod the shrubs and see if
we can flush out any birds."
"There is cause for worry, but no cause for
hysteria," de Maiziere assured his listeners. But
while he has never been much of an agitator, his
colleagues at the state level have described the
situation in much more drastic terms. Uwe
Schu:nemann, for example, who has been the
interior minister of the northwestern state of
Lower Saxony since 2003, stated that he had "never
experienced a heightened security situation like
this one." And Berlin Senator for the Interior
Ehrhart Ko:rting, whose position is tantamount to
that of a government minister in the city-state,
has already even gone so far as to call on the
inhabitants of the German capital city to report
suspicious-looking individuals of Arab origin to
the police. "If you suddenly see three somewhat
strange-looking men who are new to your
neighborhood, who hide their faces and who only
speak Arabic," Ko:rting said, "you should report
them to the authorities."
Under heightened pressure, officials in Germany's
16 federal states are now checking to see when and
where major events are scheduled to take place
this coming week within their boundaries. And
nothing suggested as a possible target is being
discounted, no matter how unlikely. For example,
officials in Rhineland-Palatinate warned the
state's interior minister, Karl Peter Burch, that
there was always a lot going on at IKEA stores on
Saturdays.[WTF]
Serenity, Scaremongering and Strategy
Since last week, German politicians at both the
state and federal levels have once again had to
figure out how they will handle themselves when
making warnings about terrorist attacks. They have
had to come up with a language that can
simultaneously convey both an alert and a sense of
calm.
This is no easy task. For one thing, this isn't
the first time this has happened. In September
2009, for example, right before federal elections
were held, there were concrete threats that
resulted in a heightened security situation. But,
in the end, nothing happened. This time around,
people are wondering whether they are on the
precipice of an emergency or whether these are
once again empty threats.
Still, one thing is certain: For the time being,
Germany has become a different country -- more
nervous, more anxious, more agitated. And
Germany's domestic security policies are being put
to the test.
When Interior Minister de Maiziere assumed his
office in October 2009 in conservative Chancellor
Angela Merkel's government, he aimed to cool down
the heated sense of alarm regularly fanned out by
his predecessors. What's more, the man who had
served as Merkel's chief of staff in Chancellery
until being moved to the role of interior minister
in her new government, was given the task of
nurturing a more relaxed relationship between her
party, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), and
its new coalition partner, the business-friendly
Free Democratic Party (FDP). In particular, it was
his job to not draw out the long-standing conflict
over domestic security policies with the Justice
Ministry, which has been led since the 2009
election by Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, a
member of the FDP. Indeed, Merkel feared that the
quarrelsome FDP might try to capitalize on the
issue to win over more voters, so she assigned de
Maiziere to prevent that from happening.
In fact, the plan was to repeat the same strategy
that the CDU and its Bavarian sister party, the
Christian Social Union (CSU), had used when they
were in the so-called "grand coalition" with the
center-left Social Democratic Party, between 2005
and 2009. At the time, they made a point of
undermining the SPD by championing what had
traditionally been the latter party's issues.
A Game-Changer
But now the game plan has changed. This November
will drastically alter de Maiziere's understanding
of his role in office. If he tries to return
things to their previous state of calm, he's going
to have a very tough time. In fact, it's much more
likely that he will be a completely different
interior minister.
For a while now, de Maiziere's softer stance has
prompted opposition by politicians on the right
involved with domestic security issues. But they
are now calling louder than ever for a tougher
course to be followed. Merkel is also adjusting to
the new situation and is reportedly happy with the
way de Maiziere handled himself last week.
Likewise, no one seems to have voiced any
criticism last Thursday evening during a meeting
of the Coalition Committee, a regular gathering of
the parties that are part of the government.
The almost complete lack of protest has a lot to
do with where the alarming information is coming
from. In fact, information regarding the
supposedly imminent attacks has come from two
independent sources. Shortly before receiving the
telephone call about the planned attacks, BKA
officials had received a cable from their American
counterparts at the FBI, America's federal police
force, warning of possible attacks.
Still, what truth is there in these
"security-related" pieces of information coming
from both domestic and foreign sources? And, given
all the discrepancies in the warning messages,
just how much do they deserve to be trusted?
Indeed, even among security officials themselves,
there is some doubt about how legitimate these
statements are -- and about just how acute the
danger threatening Germany really is.
An Attack Modelled after Mumbai[plot details in
this section]
What the caller reported was undeniably alarming.
According to him, al-Qaida and associated groups
based in Pakistan were making joint preparations
for an attack in Germany. One idea was to remotely
detonate a bomb using a mobile phone. Another
called for a small group of terrorists to storm
the Reichstag with guns blazing, take hostages and
end everything in one calamitous bloodbath.
Indeed, BKA officials learned that the latter plan
had been modeled on the storming of luxury hotels
in Mumbai, the Indian capital, almost exactly two
years ago, in a massacre that left 175 people
dead.
According to the caller, the plan called for the
terrorists to procure the submachine guns,
automatic rifles, explosives and whatever else
they would need to storm Germany's parliament
building in the Balkans. He said that two men had
already traveled to Germany six to eight weeks
earlier, adding that one had the nom de guerre of
"Abu Mohammed" and that the other one was a German
of Turkish origin. Both apparently had roots in
the Greater Berlin metropolitan area, were
currently unemployed and living off of welfare
payments and had immersed themselves in the
anonymity provided by a major city -- until the
time should come for their activation.
Likewise, there were allegedly four other
volunteers -- including a German, a Turk, a North
African and another jihadist of unknown identity
-- in the training camps run by al-Qaida and
related groups waiting for the signal to travel to
Germany. And, according to the telephone source,
al-Qaida's plan was to attack in February or
March.
The only question now relates to just how credible
the caller's statements are. He is an insider who
joined up with armed groups several months ago and
has earned a reputation as a fanatic fighter.
But could it be that he is only trying to tell
German officials the juiciest things possible in
order to raise his own market value and thereby
prompt them to extract him from the terror scene?
Or could it be that al-Qaida is even planning a
second spectacular coup like the one in December
2009, when the Americans allowed a supposedly
top-level turncoat onto an American military base
without any sort of pat-down, who went on to
detonate his explosive vest and blow seven CIA
officials to bits?
A Strange Message
A clear picture has yet to emerge. And one reason
for this is also the fact that it was only two
weeks ago that the FBI first decided to share
information about another possible attack with
German officials.
In this case, even the way contact was made was
unusual. Under normal circumstances, liaisons from
the CIA station in Germany are the ones to
communicate American warnings to their German
counterparts. But, this time around, it was an
apparently particularly anxious FBI that chose to
directly notify the BKA.
The FBI told the Germans about an obscure Indian
group called "Saif," or "sword." Despite being a
Shiite group, it had allegedly made a pact with
al-Qaida, a Sunni organization, and sent five of
its men to the Pakistani province of Waziristan
for training. According to the FBI, two volunteers
-- who were already equipped with visas allowing
them to travel freely within the 25 European
countries belonging to the Schengen zone -- were
supposedly already en route to Germany and would
enter the United Arab Emirates on Monday, Nov. 22.
There, they would allegedly be provided with new
travel documents before traveling on to Germany.
One of the men is supposedly named "Khan," which
is about as common in that part of the world as
"Smith" is in English-speaking countries. And no
firm conclusion had been made about their
nationalities.
The FBI agents even named the presumed masterminds
behind the operation. A certain Mushtaq Altaf
Bin-Khadri, who is in charge of finances and
training for "Saif," allegedly dispatched the
terrorist squad. But the FBI was not in a position
to comment on the targets of the two men in
Germany.
One name came up time and again in the communique,
and one that pricked the Germans' ears: Dawood
Ibrahim. The 54-year-old arms trader is "India's
most-wanted man." The US government has listed him
as a "global terrorist" and persuaded the United
Nations to place his name on a list of supporters
of terror. Ibrahim is rumored to be the head of
D-Company, a criminal syndicate named after
himself, and is believed to be in charge of
smuggling the suspected terrorists into Germany.
Both the FBI and the BKA are attaching a lot of
importance to the information in the FBI
communique. But the intelligence services of the
two countries -- the CIA in the United States and
the BND and Office for the Protection of the
Constitution in Germany, the country's foreign and
domestic intelligence agencies, respectively --
point to internal contradictions as reasons for
their skepticism. As they see it, for example, it
is highly unlikely that a Shiite group would team
up with Sunni terrorists, especially since a good
part of al-Qaida propaganda vilifies Shiites.
Other reasons for doubt include the facts that
none of the intelligence agencies was previously
familiar with an organization called "Saif," that
there have been no previously recorded threats
against Germany by Indian extremists, and that the
whole scenario seems rather implausible.
On the other hand, the FBI information is
uncommonly concrete. In addition to the names of
the suspects, it also provides information about
the exact day on which they are supposed to arrive
in the United Arab Emirates. Moreover, Ibrahim is
believed to be one of the men behind the terror
attacks in Mumbai. If he really is involved, that
alone would be reason enough for worry.
Abnormal Circumstances
Under normal circumstances, a message of this kind
from the United States would no doubt be cause for
serious-minded scrutiny, but it would not be a
cause for alarm. For example, the BKA would go
through all recent visa applications, and federal
police officers would take a closer look at all
the people entering Germany from Arab states. And
the intelligence services would make the rounds to
see if any of its partners had any helpful
information on the matter.
Indeed, under normal circumstances, there are
always a lot of these communiques, most of which
turn out to be false alarms. But these are no
normal circumstances. Germany is in a state of
emergency. Other countries, such as the United
States, employ a system of official warning levels
based on color codes that change -- from yellow to
orange, for example -- when the danger level is
thought to increase. But, in Germany, the interior
minister is the barometer: He consults with
experts -- and then it is he who must call the
shots.
For the minister, a situation like this presents a
dilemma. If he remains silent and something
happens, he's a failure. If he makes loud warning
and nothing happens, he's just a rabble-rouser
trying to push through controversial tougher
security laws. And, of course, the public never
thanks you if everyday life continues in a normal,
peaceful way.
Absolute Security Remains a Pipe Dream
When de Maiziere became Germany's interior
minister, he had planned to lead the ministry in a
level-headed way. For example, he prefers to use
phrases such as "internal calm" rather than
"internal security." And it was only six weeks ago
that he uttered the sentence: "There's no cause
for alarm." But, since then, the chorus of warning
voices has only ballooned in size.
This change in course is the combined result of
everything that happened beforehand. It might very
well turn out that the alleged Indian terror squad
stays home and that the raid on the Reichstag
never happens. But what will remain is a
well-founded supposition that there is a critical
mass of terrorists in the border region between
Afghanistan and Pakistan that is thinking about
launching attacks in Europe -- and certainly in
Germany, as well.
Raw Nerves
Given such circumstances, there is a major sense
of alarm among German officials. Last Thursday,
just a day after de Maiziere's shocking press
conference, the BKA issued a press release "in
connection with the current high-risk situation."
It reported that a piece of suspicious luggage had
been discovered a day earlier in Windhoek, the
capital of Namibia, before being loaded onto a
plane bound for Germany. The laptop bag contained
batteries, wires, a detonator and a clock -- in
other words, all the ingredients you need for a
potential airborne catastrophe.
It sounded as if another terror plot had been
foiled. Had there been a plan to blow up Air
Berlin Flight 7377 en route to Munich? And had the
authorities, yet again, discovered an explosive
device at the last minute? In the end, all the
worry was unfounded. As it turned out, the piece
of luggage was a test device built by a company
that designs "real test" suitcases to be used to
test security measures. It remains unclear who
checked the bag in. But the fact that the BKA was
so quick to go into alarm mode -- and publicly so
-- has been a communications debacle.
Of course, these days, nobody wants to be the one
that wasn't sufficiently circumspect, the one who
took too long to speak up. No one wants a replay
of situations like the one from the beginning of
November, when de Maiziere didn't know for hours
whether the package that had arrived at the
Chancellery contained actual explosives or was
just a false alarm. Now, the threshold for
sounding the alarm is already much lower.
Bonded by Fear
Of course, you can never be too sure. Over the
last 12 months, a series of attacks concocted in
the Afghan-Pakistani border region have been
foiled in the West. For example, in May, a car
bomb set in New York's Times Square by a man with
ties to the Pakistani Taliban failed to properly
detonate. In Copenhagen, al-Qaida had made plans
to storm the offices of the Jyllands-Posten
newspaper as revenge for its 2005 publishing of
caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad. In October
2009, David Headley, an American citizen with
Pakistani roots, was arrested after having already
visited the newspaper's offices in order to scout
them out before the planned attack. Other targets
reportedly included the subway systems of New York
City and Washington.
On the other hand, absolute security is a pipe
dream. For example, British authorities had even
conducted rehearsals for how to respond to
possible attacks. But, even so, when attacks
claiming 56 lives (including those of four
attackers) did strike London, on July 7, 2005,
they were unable to prevent them. Likewise, US
intelligence services had warned India a number of
times that terrorists were planning attacks in
Mumbai.
The new situation in Germany has at least had one
positive side effect: For the time being, the
traditionally quarrelsome interior ministers from
both the state and the federal levels have
refrained from their usual bickering. Following
informal talks held last Thursday in Hamburg,
Minister Bruch of Rhineland-Palatinate noted that
he had "never experienced such harmony within this
group" that has apparently been bonded together by
their shared fear.
Translated from the German by Josh Ward
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Ben West
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
Austin, TX
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Ben West
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
Austin, TX
--
Ben West
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
Austin, TX
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com