The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2546
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Re: [CT] DISCUSSION GERMANY/CT-The Story Behind Germany's Terror Threat

Released on 2012-08-12 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1976918
Date | 2010-11-22 18:43:07
From | sean.noonan@stratfor.com
To | ct@stratfor.com
List-Name | ct@stratfor.com

There is a notable difference here. And that is the German warning issued
last week. It was based on their own intelligence not American
intelligence--so no blaming americans this time. Yes, it's true that they
don't have the capability to attack the Reichstag, and theat the attack is
not imminent, as I pointed out. But on the other hand, like with cargo
parcels, it doesn't mean that something is not in the works. Have we ever
seen information this specific before on the individuals and their travel
plans?
This is the conundrum of warning intelligence, when the warning is given
(just to policymakers, or to the public), measures are taken that prevent
it. It then comes the boy-who-cried-wolf, even if the warning was
originally accurate.
Not to mention, given what happened with the last double agent to become
public (Khost), it will be interesting to follow this one.
On 11/22/10 11:33 AM, Ben West wrote:
I agree that the spiegel article was good - but this is the kind of
thing we've seen over and over again in Europe. Source from durkastan
says that aq is going to target Europe and kill lots of people and that
attackers are en route. Everyone gets freaked out. Nothing significant
happens. Europe blames US of scare mongering.
Certainly islamists have europe in their cross-hairs, but if an attack
is going to happen, it's not going be preceded by this kind of
publicity.
Also, attacking the reichstag? I mean, it's possible to ATTACK it, but
they've got a pretty heavy security presence there that would prevent a
hostage situation. I was there a few years ago. The public entryway is
confined to one doorway with a heavy guard presence, metal detectors,
x-ray machines, etc. If anything, an attack could kill lots of tourists
lined up outside, but it would take a very serious force to be able to
gain entrance to the reichstag and an even more well trained force to
actually hold hostages. This sounds like a pipe-dream to me.
On 11/22/2010 11:04 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
thoughts?
On 11/22/10 11:00 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
It is up to you and CT how you approach this. On the short-term,
this looks like something you can handle without me. If you want to
dabble in the more long-term view of what is going on here, I would
love to help.
On 11/22/10 10:58 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
In the more long-term, I think an analysis of the German
intelligence agencies would be good too. They have been pretty
decimated by the Cold War and by all the problems associated with
running an intelligence agency in a post-Gestapo country. If
Germany is ever going to become a world power again, however, they
would need to overcome these deamons as well. That is sort of the
last straw for Germany, the one that is going to be most sensitive
to overcome. But perhaps this case may illustrate how they are
already overcoming these issues.
On 11/22/10 10:50 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
Main problem is that Der Spiegel is just that good, they've at
least touched on most of what I would want to say about it. The
main thing here is how the politics of a terror threat/alert
coincide with the reality of the threat itself.
We saw that Germany was fairly relaxed bout the earlier threat
in Europe released by the US. I'm not sure if that was the same
as the info that the FBI passed over about this shia group, Saif
(I don't know anything about them). But something changed, as
we noted last week in their interpretation. That seems to go
down to this virtual walk-in. The one thing I was left confused
about is whether BKA had ever been in contact with this source
before. It sounds like he cold called them. It's common
knowledge that walk-ins, rather than recruits, are nearly always
the best sources. But at the same time, they are very
suspicious as double agents. If this was a US source they would
be freaking the fuck out after having Al-Balawi turn on them.
The germans seem to have cooler heads, but they will be working
24/7 to verify the source (let me make another plug for John
Lecarre's A Most Wanted Man here, most of his career was in
Germany).
They've clearly got enough corroborating information that they
consider this a real threat. But politically they are faced
with the universal 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' alert
problem. If the Interior ministry doesn't say something, they
will be liable if an attack occurs. Look at the constant press
over information on the warning intelligence for Mumbai. As
we've said before, simply issuing the warning may help to deter
the attackers.
The real important bit here, is that it seems the germans have
fairly good intelligence. While this attack is still not
happening tomorrow, they have a lot of details about what might
be in the works, rather than a single-source intercept that
indicates some vague threat. It seems they've increased
security pretty well at the Bundestag, and want to add to the
presence at any possible target. This is where we seem them
scrambling, and where their intelligence holes are.
The task now for the germans is to verify this source. Maybe
even pick him up and put him on ice somewhere (Fred/Stick?), not
in GErmany but in Pakistan/Afghanistan. That will require some
cooperation with either/both the Americans and Pakistanis. They
also need to verify all the bio information they have on these
4-6 guys trying to get into germany and watch travelers very
carefully. The germans seem to be very good at surveilling
these threats within Germany, so their best luck may come when
one of the guys overseas contacts a local already under
surveillance.
At minimum, this could be a pretty interesting tearline this
week. Both the walk-in issues and the CIA/FBI liaison conflicts
that I havne't gotten into here.
On 11/22/10 10:34 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
Any thoughts on where you guys are thinking of going with
this?
Der Spiegel article is indeed interesting.
On 11/22/10 9:28 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
Great report from Der Spiegel (thanks Mikey). I suggest
anyone interested to read the whole thing. They ask the
right questions, and while not as much detail as I hoped,
give us a much better understanding on the threat in
Germany.
The BKA (germany's FBI) must be extremely busy verifying the
details of this virtual walk-in. It obviously caused the
germans to shit their pants. But the real questions are
buried in the article---how real was this plot, how real is
the source, is the source just trying to get back to the
land of brezeln and bier? Trying to double-cross them
somehow?
Also note the tip off from the FBI (cue fred), not the usual
CIA liaison with BND.
For Eurasia, there's a lot in here on the internal politics
of the interior minister position, and the relation between
state and federal government.
On 11/22/10 8:55 AM, Michael Wilson wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [OS] GERMANY/CT-The Story Behind Germany's
Terror Threat
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:38:21 -0600
From: Graham Smith <graham.smith@stratfor.com>
Reply-To: The OS List <os@stratfor.com>
To: os@stratfor.com
11/22/2010 11:38 AM
Fears of a Mumbai Redux
The Story Behind Germany's Terror Threat
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,730377,00.html
By Matthias Bartsch, Yassin Musharbash and Holger Stark
Germany is currently in a state of high alert. Security
officials are warning that they have concrete information
pointing to a possible terror attack on the federal
parliament building in Berlin, a massively popular tourist
attraction. The days of Interior Minister Thomas de
Maiziere's reserved stances in dealing with such warnings
appear to be over.
The call came from abroad, and the man speaking hurriedly
on the other end of the line sounded as if he feared for
his life. He wanted out, he told the officers of the
German Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) -- out of the
terrorist scene. He wanted to come back to Germany, back
to his family. Then he asked if German officials could
help him.
Right now, they're trying to do just that. The BKA is
pursuing the case under the codename "Nova." The
apparently remorseful man could be an important possible
whistleblower from a dangerous region of the globe. In
fact, he is also the most recent reason why German
Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere put the entire
country in a state of fright on Wednesday.
During a hastily called press conference that day, de
Maiziere stated that Germany faced the threat of terrorist
attacks that might be launched against the country at some
point in November. As he put it, Germany is "presently
dealing with a new situation."
Just two days earlier, the source had called for the third
time in just a short period and provided more information.
He told officials that a small group of terrorists wanted
to conduct a raid on the Reichstag building in Berlin,
which houses the federal parliament, and that that was
only one of the targets included in their attack plans.
Germany on High Alert
Since then, Germany has been in a state of high alert. The
Reichstag is surrounded with barricades and its popular
cupola tourist attraction temporarily closed to visitors.
Police armed with submachine guns are patrolling major
railway stations and airports. And vacations have been
called off for officials at the country's security
agencies. Wherever they have cause for doing so, the
authorities are secretly monitoring communications,
conducting surveillance operations and launching
undercover investigations. At the moment, investigators
seem to be at a loss; their modus operandi: "We'll prod
the shrubs and see if we can flush out any birds."
"There is cause for worry, but no cause for hysteria," de
Maiziere assured his listeners. But while he has never
been much of an agitator, his colleagues at the state
level have described the situation in much more drastic
terms. Uwe Schu:nemann, for example, who has been the
interior minister of the northwestern state of Lower
Saxony since 2003, stated that he had "never experienced a
heightened security situation like this one." And Berlin
Senator for the Interior Ehrhart Ko:rting, whose position
is tantamount to that of a government minister in the
city-state, has already even gone so far as to call on the
inhabitants of the German capital city to report
suspicious-looking individuals of Arab origin to the
police. "If you suddenly see three somewhat
strange-looking men who are new to your neighborhood, who
hide their faces and who only speak Arabic," Ko:rting
said, "you should report them to the authorities."
Under heightened pressure, officials in Germany's 16
federal states are now checking to see when and where
major events are scheduled to take place this coming week
within their boundaries. And nothing suggested as a
possible target is being discounted, no matter how
unlikely. For example, officials in Rhineland-Palatinate
warned the state's interior minister, Karl Peter Burch,
that there was always a lot going on at IKEA stores on
Saturdays.[WTF]
Serenity, Scaremongering and Strategy
Since last week, German politicians at both the state and
federal levels have once again had to figure out how they
will handle themselves when making warnings about
terrorist attacks. They have had to come up with a
language that can simultaneously convey both an alert and
a sense of calm.
This is no easy task. For one thing, this isn't the first
time this has happened. In September 2009, for example,
right before federal elections were held, there were
concrete threats that resulted in a heightened security
situation. But, in the end, nothing happened. This time
around, people are wondering whether they are on the
precipice of an emergency or whether these are once again
empty threats.
Still, one thing is certain: For the time being, Germany
has become a different country -- more nervous, more
anxious, more agitated. And Germany's domestic security
policies are being put to the test.
When Interior Minister de Maiziere assumed his office in
October 2009 in conservative Chancellor Angela Merkel's
government, he aimed to cool down the heated sense of
alarm regularly fanned out by his predecessors. What's
more, the man who had served as Merkel's chief of staff in
Chancellery until being moved to the role of interior
minister in her new government, was given the task of
nurturing a more relaxed relationship between her party,
the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), and its new
coalition partner, the business-friendly Free Democratic
Party (FDP). In particular, it was his job to not draw out
the long-standing conflict over domestic security policies
with the Justice Ministry, which has been led since the
2009 election by Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, a
member of the FDP. Indeed, Merkel feared that the
quarrelsome FDP might try to capitalize on the issue to
win over more voters, so she assigned de Maiziere to
prevent that from happening.
In fact, the plan was to repeat the same strategy that the
CDU and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social
Union (CSU), had used when they were in the so-called
"grand coalition" with the center-left Social Democratic
Party, between 2005 and 2009. At the time, they made a
point of undermining the SPD by championing what had
traditionally been the latter party's issues.
A Game-Changer
But now the game plan has changed. This November will
drastically alter de Maiziere's understanding of his role
in office. If he tries to return things to their previous
state of calm, he's going to have a very tough time. In
fact, it's much more likely that he will be a completely
different interior minister.
For a while now, de Maiziere's softer stance has prompted
opposition by politicians on the right involved with
domestic security issues. But they are now calling louder
than ever for a tougher course to be followed. Merkel is
also adjusting to the new situation and is reportedly
happy with the way de Maiziere handled himself last week.
Likewise, no one seems to have voiced any criticism last
Thursday evening during a meeting of the Coalition
Committee, a regular gathering of the parties that are
part of the government.
The almost complete lack of protest has a lot to do with
where the alarming information is coming from. In fact,
information regarding the supposedly imminent attacks has
come from two independent sources. Shortly before
receiving the telephone call about the planned attacks,
BKA officials had received a cable from their American
counterparts at the FBI, America's federal police force,
warning of possible attacks.
Still, what truth is there in these "security-related"
pieces of information coming from both domestic and
foreign sources? And, given all the discrepancies in the
warning messages, just how much do they deserve to be
trusted? Indeed, even among security officials themselves,
there is some doubt about how legitimate these statements
are -- and about just how acute the danger threatening
Germany really is.
An Attack Modelled after Mumbai[plot details in this
section]
What the caller reported was undeniably alarming.
According to him, al-Qaida and associated groups based in
Pakistan were making joint preparations for an attack in
Germany. One idea was to remotely detonate a bomb using a
mobile phone. Another called for a small group of
terrorists to storm the Reichstag with guns blazing, take
hostages and end everything in one calamitous bloodbath.
Indeed, BKA officials learned that the latter plan had
been modeled on the storming of luxury hotels in Mumbai,
the Indian capital, almost exactly two years ago, in a
massacre that left 175 people dead.
According to the caller, the plan called for the
terrorists to procure the submachine guns, automatic
rifles, explosives and whatever else they would need to
storm Germany's parliament building in the Balkans. He
said that two men had already traveled to Germany six to
eight weeks earlier, adding that one had the nom de guerre
of "Abu Mohammed" and that the other one was a German of
Turkish origin. Both apparently had roots in the Greater
Berlin metropolitan area, were currently unemployed and
living off of welfare payments and had immersed themselves
in the anonymity provided by a major city -- until the
time should come for their activation.
Likewise, there were allegedly four other volunteers --
including a German, a Turk, a North African and another
jihadist of unknown identity -- in the training camps run
by al-Qaida and related groups waiting for the signal to
travel to Germany. And, according to the telephone source,
al-Qaida's plan was to attack in February or March.
The only question now relates to just how credible the
caller's statements are. He is an insider who joined up
with armed groups several months ago and has earned a
reputation as a fanatic fighter.
But could it be that he is only trying to tell German
officials the juiciest things possible in order to raise
his own market value and thereby prompt them to extract
him from the terror scene? Or could it be that al-Qaida is
even planning a second spectacular coup like the one in
December 2009, when the Americans allowed a supposedly
top-level turncoat onto an American military base without
any sort of pat-down, who went on to detonate his
explosive vest and blow seven CIA officials to bits?
A Strange Message
A clear picture has yet to emerge. And one reason for this
is also the fact that it was only two weeks ago that the
FBI first decided to share information about another
possible attack with German officials.
In this case, even the way contact was made was unusual.
Under normal circumstances, liaisons from the CIA station
in Germany are the ones to communicate American warnings
to their German counterparts. But, this time around, it
was an apparently particularly anxious FBI that chose to
directly notify the BKA.
The FBI told the Germans about an obscure Indian group
called "Saif," or "sword." Despite being a Shiite group,
it had allegedly made a pact with al-Qaida, a Sunni
organization, and sent five of its men to the Pakistani
province of Waziristan for training. According to the FBI,
two volunteers -- who were already equipped with visas
allowing them to travel freely within the 25 European
countries belonging to the Schengen zone -- were
supposedly already en route to Germany and would enter the
United Arab Emirates on Monday, Nov. 22. There, they would
allegedly be provided with new travel documents before
traveling on to Germany. One of the men is supposedly
named "Khan," which is about as common in that part of the
world as "Smith" is in English-speaking countries. And no
firm conclusion had been made about their nationalities.
The FBI agents even named the presumed masterminds behind
the operation. A certain Mushtaq Altaf Bin-Khadri, who is
in charge of finances and training for "Saif," allegedly
dispatched the terrorist squad. But the FBI was not in a
position to comment on the targets of the two men in
Germany.
One name came up time and again in the communique, and one
that pricked the Germans' ears: Dawood Ibrahim. The
54-year-old arms trader is "India's most-wanted man." The
US government has listed him as a "global terrorist" and
persuaded the United Nations to place his name on a list
of supporters of terror. Ibrahim is rumored to be the head
of D-Company, a criminal syndicate named after himself,
and is believed to be in charge of smuggling the suspected
terrorists into Germany.
Both the FBI and the BKA are attaching a lot of importance
to the information in the FBI communique. But the
intelligence services of the two countries -- the CIA in
the United States and the BND and Office for the
Protection of the Constitution in Germany, the country's
foreign and domestic intelligence agencies, respectively
-- point to internal contradictions as reasons for their
skepticism. As they see it, for example, it is highly
unlikely that a Shiite group would team up with Sunni
terrorists, especially since a good part of al-Qaida
propaganda vilifies Shiites. Other reasons for doubt
include the facts that none of the intelligence agencies
was previously familiar with an organization called
"Saif," that there have been no previously recorded
threats against Germany by Indian extremists, and that the
whole scenario seems rather implausible.
On the other hand, the FBI information is uncommonly
concrete. In addition to the names of the suspects, it
also provides information about the exact day on which
they are supposed to arrive in the United Arab Emirates.
Moreover, Ibrahim is believed to be one of the men behind
the terror attacks in Mumbai. If he really is involved,
that alone would be reason enough for worry.
Abnormal Circumstances
Under normal circumstances, a message of this kind from
the United States would no doubt be cause for
serious-minded scrutiny, but it would not be a cause for
alarm. For example, the BKA would go through all recent
visa applications, and federal police officers would take
a closer look at all the people entering Germany from Arab
states. And the intelligence services would make the
rounds to see if any of its partners had any helpful
information on the matter.
Indeed, under normal circumstances, there are always a lot
of these communiques, most of which turn out to be false
alarms. But these are no normal circumstances. Germany is
in a state of emergency. Other countries, such as the
United States, employ a system of official warning levels
based on color codes that change -- from yellow to orange,
for example -- when the danger level is thought to
increase. But, in Germany, the interior minister is the
barometer: He consults with experts -- and then it is he
who must call the shots.
For the minister, a situation like this presents a
dilemma. If he remains silent and something happens, he's
a failure. If he makes loud warning and nothing happens,
he's just a rabble-rouser trying to push through
controversial tougher security laws. And, of course, the
public never thanks you if everyday life continues in a
normal, peaceful way.
Absolute Security Remains a Pipe Dream
When de Maiziere became Germany's interior minister, he
had planned to lead the ministry in a level-headed way.
For example, he prefers to use phrases such as "internal
calm" rather than "internal security." And it was only six
weeks ago that he uttered the sentence: "There's no cause
for alarm." But, since then, the chorus of warning voices
has only ballooned in size.
This change in course is the combined result of everything
that happened beforehand. It might very well turn out that
the alleged Indian terror squad stays home and that the
raid on the Reichstag never happens. But what will remain
is a well-founded supposition that there is a critical
mass of terrorists in the border region between
Afghanistan and Pakistan that is thinking about launching
attacks in Europe -- and certainly in Germany, as well.
Raw Nerves
Given such circumstances, there is a major sense of alarm
among German officials. Last Thursday, just a day after de
Maiziere's shocking press conference, the BKA issued a
press release "in connection with the current high-risk
situation." It reported that a piece of suspicious luggage
had been discovered a day earlier in Windhoek, the capital
of Namibia, before being loaded onto a plane bound for
Germany. The laptop bag contained batteries, wires, a
detonator and a clock -- in other words, all the
ingredients you need for a potential airborne catastrophe.
It sounded as if another terror plot had been foiled. Had
there been a plan to blow up Air Berlin Flight 7377 en
route to Munich? And had the authorities, yet again,
discovered an explosive device at the last minute? In the
end, all the worry was unfounded. As it turned out, the
piece of luggage was a test device built by a company that
designs "real test" suitcases to be used to test security
measures. It remains unclear who checked the bag in. But
the fact that the BKA was so quick to go into alarm mode
-- and publicly so -- has been a communications debacle.
Of course, these days, nobody wants to be the one that
wasn't sufficiently circumspect, the one who took too long
to speak up. No one wants a replay of situations like the
one from the beginning of November, when de Maiziere
didn't know for hours whether the package that had arrived
at the Chancellery contained actual explosives or was just
a false alarm. Now, the threshold for sounding the alarm
is already much lower.
Bonded by Fear
Of course, you can never be too sure. Over the last 12
months, a series of attacks concocted in the
Afghan-Pakistani border region have been foiled in the
West. For example, in May, a car bomb set in New York's
Times Square by a man with ties to the Pakistani Taliban
failed to properly detonate. In Copenhagen, al-Qaida had
made plans to storm the offices of the Jyllands-Posten
newspaper as revenge for its 2005 publishing of
caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad. In October 2009,
David Headley, an American citizen with Pakistani roots,
was arrested after having already visited the newspaper's
offices in order to scout them out before the planned
attack. Other targets reportedly included the subway
systems of New York City and Washington.
On the other hand, absolute security is a pipe dream. For
example, British authorities had even conducted rehearsals
for how to respond to possible attacks. But, even so, when
attacks claiming 56 lives (including those of four
attackers) did strike London, on July 7, 2005, they were
unable to prevent them. Likewise, US intelligence services
had warned India a number of times that terrorists were
planning attacks in Mumbai.
The new situation in Germany has at least had one positive
side effect: For the time being, the traditionally
quarrelsome interior ministers from both the state and the
federal levels have refrained from their usual bickering.
Following informal talks held last Thursday in Hamburg,
Minister Bruch of Rhineland-Palatinate noted that he had
"never experienced such harmony within this group" that
has apparently been bonded together by their shared fear.
Translated from the German by Josh Ward
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Ben West
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
Austin, TX
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com