The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2546
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## US/LATAM/FSU/MESA - Al-Jazeera TV panel discusses Syria unrest, USA, Turkey position - IRAN/US/RUSSIA/ISRAEL/TURKEY/LEBANON/SYRIA/QATAR/IRAQ/LIBYA

Released on 2012-08-22 09:00 GMT

Email-ID | 690728
Date | 2011-08-14 18:26:08
From | nobody@stratfor.com
To | translations@stratfor.com
List-Name | translations@stratfor.com

Al-Jazeera TV panel discusses Syria unrest, USA, Turkey position
Al-Jazeera Satellite Channel Television in Arabic, independent
television station financed by the Qatari government, at 1904 gmt on 13
August broadcasts on its "Talk of the Revolution" programme a live
29-minute discussion, moderated by Hasan Jammul in the studio, on the
"the fate of the Syrian regime's pledge to effect substantive reforms
within only two weeks, given the developments on the ground where a
military solution is still being implemented".
A video report is presented by Iman Ramadan on recent developments,
including the Turkish foreign minister's visit to Damascus, Hillary
Clinton's statement that the United States will escalate pressure on
Al-Asad's regime, urging "those countries still buying Syrian oil and
gas, those countries still sending al-Asad weapons, those countries
whose political and economic support give him comfort in his brutality,
to get on the right side of history". Ramadan also cites the US
permanent UN representative's remarks in this regard. She also cites
reports at the United Nations "that the Obama administration is
considering issuing a blunt call on the Syrian president to quit".
She says that "some neighbours of Syria" are of the opinion that
Al-Asad's regime is not responsible for the killing so far of at least
2,000 unarmed civilians but say that the responsible side is "the
Al-Qa'idah Organization, which is trying to spread trouble in Syria".
The report also cites Iraq's Al-Maliki's visit to Damascus, "noting that
many consider the Iraqi stand on the developments in Syria to be similar
to the Iranian stand". She also mentions the Saudi king's "unequivocal"
demands from the Syrian president", and the statement by an Iranian
official declaring support for Al-Asad's regime from the Arab League
headquarters in Cairo.
To discuss this issue, Jammul hosts "Syrian opposition figure and
journalist" Farhan al-Matar, via satellite from Cairo; Samir Salihah,
professor of international relations at the Kocaeli University, via
satellite from Istanbul; and writer and journalist Yunus Awdah, via
satellite from Beirut.
Syria stepping up military action
He begins by asking Awdah to explain the current strategy of the Syrian
regime, which, while reaffirming its intention to implement reforms, is
stepping up its military action. Awdah says that it is perfectly clear
that despite its changing tone, which sometimes escalates and sometimes
abates, the United States "does not trust any of those who call
themselves Syrian opposition, especially the armed groups, which are
managed through US moral and financial support", and adds: "The
Americans do not believe that all these groups that are opposing the
Syrian regime will be able to realize any victory against the regime.
Naturally, the regime also has a vision, based on its unshakeable
resolve that it will not change its policy. It is proceeding on two
lines: striking the armed insurgent groups and effect reform plans."
He says that the regime promised constitutional and other reforms,
noting that the "slogan of brining down the regime, as the United States
wants, is unrealistic".
Asked to comment on the report that the United States is "considering
asking the Syrian president to quit", Awdah says the United States has
not asked him to quit but has said that he has forfeited his legitimacy,
adding that it uses the word "considering" and this is a diplomatic
language, arguing that this consideration might continue for ever, and
adding that the United States is perfectly aware of the "international
balance of forces" and is trying to gather supporters around it. He
adds: "Russia's international stand is still strong and I believe that
when Russia says that you should pressure the opposition to stop the
armed insurgents," its "international stand will be significant". He
says that statements by Obama and other administration officials
"clearly indicate that they do not trust the Syrian opposition" because
they have been concentrating on the call for "stopping the violence."
Jammul then turns to Farhan al-Matar and asks him to react to what Awdah
says. He replies: "I would like to ask Mr Awdah if he is a spokesman of
the Syrian government, because we want to know the basis of this
discussion between us. Awdah has conveyed the viewpoint of the Syrian
government and media in a much more successful way than the Syrian
government itself has been doing. He has adopted the idea that there are
armed gangs and groups. This does not provide a sound basis for this
discussion."
Jammul tells Al-Matar that Awdah is here as a guest and he is airing his
viewpoint and "you can confront him with any idea you like". Al-Matar
objects to Awdah's contention that the United States does not trust the
Syrian opposition, and adds: "Who told you that we as a Syrian
opposition, or a Syrian people, trust the US Administration in the first
place, or pin any hopes on it? We do not trust the United States nor do
we trust the consequences of the US stand. If one day, or at one point,
we want to take an objective view and appreciate the facts of what is
happening, then we will thank it. We do not want more than that. We will
not kiss the hands of the United States or others. How can Mr Awdah
sponsor in this way the claim about armed groups? Has the regime, Mr
Awdah, with due respect to you, been able to prove the existence of
armed groups?"
''Talking to dying man''
Asked what will be the fate of the reforms and decrees that President
Al-sad has issued, Al-Matar says that talking about reforms now is like
talking to a dying man about the upcoming marriage of his son or his
son's intention to buy a house and furniture, and adds: "The talk about
the reforms that the regime has been presenting so far is unacceptable
because they are not logical or realistic. The talk about any reforms
begins with stopping this bloodbath, withdrawing the army, and
preventing the security services from persecuting the people," adding
that this should be followed by holding those with Syrian blood on their
hands accountable.
He says: "Any talk about reforms is at least two months behind us. Now
we in Syria adopt only one slogan; The People Want To Bring Down the
Regime," adding that any other talk is a betrayal of the blood of the
martyrs.
Jammul then asks Salihah in Istanbul what prompted the Turkish officials
to talk about a new deadline, after they spoke of a "firm message," and
said that their patience was running out. He asks: "How can Turkey speak
of reforms led by President Al-Asad?" Salihah says that Turkey's
convictions are not based on the Syrian regime's promises. They are not
because Turkey feels that the Syrian leadership has changed its
position, and adds: "I think that Turkey built its calculations
basically on the principle that it does not want a neighbour to be
embroiled in a crisis with several serious consequences. Moreover, the
recent Turkish regional policy is based on a specific principle; namely,
to establish an atmosphere of peace and stability in the region. The
third point is as follows: I think that there is a large-scale
Arab-Islamic-Western backing for Turkey engaging the Syrian leadership
in talks as a final and decisive phase."
Salihah says that by agreeing to undertake this "adventure, Turkey has
placed its credibility - the credibility of the Justice and Development
Party, the credibility of Davutoglu, and the credibility of the Turkish
foreign policy, which has realized great achievements over the past
several years - in one basket and this credibility will be exposed to
danger at any moment. I also believe that Turkey has to consider the
consequences of a retreat from this endeavour and I think it has done
that, and that is what it told the Syrian leadership."
He says that this morning, Gul said that "the Syrian leadership must
take a quick measure and change its policy and stand, otherwise it will
find it very difficult to restore matters back to what they were three
or four months ago, and it should benefit from the current climate,
learn a lesson, and launch a positive undertaking." He says that the
Syrian leadership has not undertaken any positive move since Davutoglu's
visit four days ago.
Turkey ''has not retreated''
Salihah maintains that Turkey has not retreated from its position
towards Syria, noting that regional and international conditions have
created a consensus that the Syrian regime should be given a "last
chance". He adds that he would not be surprised that if the regime
continued its policy for a few days, Turkey might declare that "it has
begun a new approach in its relations with the Syrian regime, an
approach which will be adopted by the international community whose
centre of gravity will be the UN Security Council and the United
Nations."
Asked to comment, Awdah says: "I would like to make it clear to Mr
Al-Matar that I am not speaking in the name of the Syrian regime or the
Syrian media. I have my own ideas and thinking and I observe
developments and make a lot of research before I have my say." He argues
that what Salihah says proves that the interfering international forces
assigned Turkey the task of taking the message and negotiating with
Syria, "which means that the entire world is plotting to reach a certain
result".
He adds: "If it is true that Mr Al-Matar does not want US interference,
then let this Syrian opposition say it, loud and clear, and issue a
clear statement, that it rejects US interference in Syrian affairs," and
adds: "Only then will this opposition become truly patriotic with no
external links."
He says that US objectives are linked to Iraq and Israel, noting that
Israel has started to build a wall in the Golan "because it has made
certain calculations and has realized that the Syrian regime will win
this battle." He says that the West realizes that what happened in Libya
might also occur in Syria, and adds: "In Libya, the UN secretary general
- as well as NATO - has announced that the military solution has failed
there." He says that armed persons are killing Syrian soldiers and
police and throwing their bodies into rivers. He says that obviously the
Syrian regime will not "allow an armed insurgency on the Syrian
territory".
''Patriotism" of Syrian opposition
Al-Matar defends the "patriotism" of the Syrian opposition, saying that
it is an expression of the will of the Syrian people, adding that the
Syrian opposition has said, and repeated, that "we reject foreign
interference." He blames Awdah once again for "promoting a number of
lies by the Syrian regime".
Asked in conclusion what Turkey and the international community will do
if the deadline that Turkey has given to Syria expires without Syria
implementing what Davutoglu and Erdogan demanded, Salihah first denies
what Awdah said; namely, that Turkey's intervention has been an
"authorization," linking Turkey to a "plot."
He adds: "I think that if the official Syrian mentality does not abandon
this thinking, these ideas, we will not reach any useful result.
Regrettably the course of the current events proves that four days after
Davutoglu's return from Damascus no useful result has been reached that
would decide matters and begin using the language of dialogue and
understanding between the two sides."
Salihah says that Turkey wants to realize what the Syrian people want
and to translate the reforms on the ground as quickly as possible, and
that a new chapter in the history of Syria would begin, noting that all
indications now point to the contrary.
He adds: "Turkey will be part of an international group that will move
to exercise more pressure on Syrian to compel it to retreat from its
position." Asked if this will take a military form, he replies: "No, it
will be diplomatic, political, and perhaps economic, but I do not think
that Turkey will take any military action in this direction. One more
point, if you please. I think that Turkey is not only meeting and
consulting with Arab and Islamic leaders, but large-scale contacts are
taking place involving the West as a whole and Russia. Turkey is also
sending messages to Tehran and to a number of figures inside Lebanon. I
think Turkey is launching a comprehensive campaign in this connection."
Source: Al-Jazeera TV, Doha, in Arabic 1904 gmt 13 Aug 11
BBC Mon ME1 MEEauosc EU1 EuroPol 140811 mr
(c) Copyright British Broadcasting Corporation 2011