The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2203
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Bhopal update - 08-03-11

Released on 2012-02-27 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 395929
Date | 2011-08-03 17:34:37
From | asigsby@allisinfo.com
To | sbwheeler@dow.com, tomm_sprick@yahoo.com, mediarelations@unioncarbide.com, CMKnochel@dow.com

Scot, Tomm,
Daily Pioneer reported the Bhopal District and Sessions court issued
notices to the CBI and the eight former UCIL officials who were convicted
in 2010 on criminal charges in the Bhopal gas accident. The notices were
about the MP State's request to revise the sentences imposed on the men
for stricter punishment. The State had also filed an appeal in the case.
The next hearing on the sentence revision is set for August 20, while the
appeal has been placed on hold.
http://www.dailypioneer.com/358003/Gas-tragedy-Bhopal-district-court-issues-notice-to-CBI.html
Coincidentally, the Indian journal Economic & Political Weekly published
in its July 30 issue a 2+ page defense of the Supreme Court's rejecting
the criminal case curative petition (aka Bhopal Criminal Curative). The
writer is SC advocate Raghav Shankar. He argued the curative petition was
the wrong legal vehicle for the CBI's effort and criticism of the SC
decision "is based on an inadequate understanding" of India's judicial
process. Shankar pointed out the MP Sessions court can indeed reframe the
charge if there is "new evidence...that speaks directly to the knowledge
of [Keshub] Mahindra and others" about the potential for harm due to
management decisions. However, he concluded "justice would probably be
best served" if the CBI withdrew its revision petition and pursued the
appeal for enhanced punishment. The CBI has said the sentence should have
been "two years [imprisonment] per wrongful death caused, with sentences
running consecutively." This would have resulted in sentences of up to
10,000 years.
Full text should be available here in pdf format:
http://epw.in/epw/uploads/articles/16357.pdf
Alternate access: http://epw.in
Indian environmental magazine Down To Earth published a report on the
chemical waste disposal issue, but only through about July 15. The article
quoted both Satinath Sarangi and Rachna Dhingra, although neither referred
to the activist-preferred remedy of Dow shipping the material out of the
country for disposal. Sarangi criticized government agencies for not
obtaining proper clearances for the process and Dhingra repeated her
question about "the other 27,000 tonnes of waste lying outside the factory
that is contaminating the groundwater and the air."
http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/bhopal-s-toxic-waste-raises-stink
Business Standard published a staff-generated report on the GoI
expenditures requests that PTI reported on Tuesday. The Bhopal
compensation reference is brief.
Not available online, the article appeared on p4 of the epaper edition.
From activist resources:
Colin Toogood posted on Twitter and Facebook a link to a Natural News
article on a Minnesota Court of Appeals ruling that proprietors of organic
farms may sue neighboring non-organic operations for "trespass" of
drifting agricultural chemicals.
http://www.naturalnews.com/033216_GMO_contamination_lawsuits.html
Ann Sigsby
Senior Analyst
Allis Information Management
www.allisinfo.com
989-835-5811
The pages comprising this e-mail contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION from
Allis Information Management, Inc. This information is intended solely for
use by the individual entity named as the recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
forward back to the sender immediately.