The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2199
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## RE: Tase Him, Bro!- Ann Coulter

Released on 2012-08-23 12:00 GMT

Email-ID | 17453
Date | 2007-09-27 22:30:55
From | burton@stratfor.com
To | campbell@stratfor.com, social@stratfor.com

Under J. Edgar Hoover's watch, this lefty college President would have his
bedroom bugged, accused as a child molester and surveilled as a
subversive. I know a few right wingers from The Tribe who are plotting
revenge. Hit these liberal arseholes in the wallet, by cutting off their
funding, so they need to get real jobs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: sarah campbell [mailto:campbell@stratfor.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 3:04 PM
To: social@stratfor.com
Subject: Tase Him, Bro!- Ann Coulter
Shes crazzzy, but Fred will probably like this article haha.
TASE HIM, BRO!
by Ann Coulter
September 26, 2007
Democrats should run Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for president. He's more coherent
than Dennis Kucinich, he dresses like their base, he's more macho than
John Edwards, and he's willing to show up at a forum where he might get
one hostile question -- unlike the current Democratic candidates for
president who won't debate on Fox News Channel. He's not married to an
impeached president, and the name "Mahmoud Ahmadinejad" is surely no more
frightening than "B. Hussein Obama."
And liberals agree with Ahmadinejad on the issues! We know that because he
was invited by an American university to speak on campus.
Contrary to all the blather about "free speech" surrounding Ahmadinejad's
appearance at Columbia, universities in America do not invite speakers who
do not perfectly mirror the political views of their America-hating
faculties. Rather, they aggressively censor differing viewpoints and
permit only a narrow category of speech on their campuses. Ask Larry
Summers.
If a university invites someone to speak, you know the faculty agrees with
the speaker. Maybe not the entire faculty. Some Columbia professors
probably consider Ahmadinejad too moderate on Israel.
Columbia president Lee Bollinger claimed the Ahmadinejad invitation is in
keeping with "Columbia's long-standing tradition of serving as a major
forum for robust debate."
Except Columbia doesn't have that tradition. This is worse than saying
"the dog ate my homework." It's like saying "the dog ate my homework" when
you're Michael Vick and everyone knows you've killed your dog.
Columbia's "tradition" is to shut down any speakers who fall outside the
teeny, tiny seditious perspective of its professors.
When Minutemen leader Jim Gilchrist and his black colleague Marvin Stewart
were invited by the College Republicans to speak at Columbia last year,
the tolerant, free-speech-loving Columbia students violently attacked
them, shutting down the speech.
Imbued with Bollinger's commitment to free speech, Columbia junior Ryan
Fukumori said of the Minutemen: "They have no right to be able to speak
here."
Needless to say -- unlike Ahmadinejad -- the university had not invited
the Minutemen. Most colleges and universities wouldn't buy a cup of coffee
for a conservative speaker.
Fees for speakers who do not hate America are raised from College
Republican fundraisers and contributions from patriotic alumni and locals
who think students ought to hear at least one alternative viewpoint in
four years of college.
And then college administrators turn a blind eye when liberal
apple-polishers and suck-ups shut down the speech or physically attack the
speaker.
Bollinger refused to punish the students who stormed the stage and
violently ended the Minutemen's speech.
So the one thing we know absolutely is that Bollinger did not allow
Ahmadinejad to speak out of respect for "free speech" because Bollinger
does not respect free speech.
Only because normal, patriotic Americans were appalled by Columbia's
invitation of Ahmadinejad to speak was Bollinger forced into the
ridiculous position of denouncing Ahmadinejad when introducing him.
Then why did you invite him?
And by the way, I'll take a denunciation if college presidents would show
up at my speeches and drone on for 10 minutes about "free speech" before I
begin.
At Syracuse University last year, when liberal hecklers tried to shut down
a speech by a popular conservative author of (almost!) six books, College
Republicans began to remove the hecklers. But Dean of Students Roy Baker
blocked them from removing students disrupting the speech on the grounds
that removing students screaming during a speech would violate the
hecklers' "free speech." They had a "free speech" right to prevent anyone
from hearing a conservative's free speech.
That's what colleges mean by "free speech." (And by the way, my fingers
are getting exhausted from making air quotes every time I use the
expression "free speech" in relation to a college campus.)
"Tolerance of opposing views" means we have to listen to their
anti-American views, but they don't have to hear our pro-American views.
(In Washington, they call this "the Fairness Doctrine.")
Liberals are never called upon to tolerate anything they don't already
adore, such as treason, pornography and heresy. In fact, those will often
get you course credit.
At Ahmadinejad's speech, every vicious anti-Western civilization remark
was cheered wildly. It was like watching an episode of HBO'S "Real Time
With Bill Maher."
Ahmadinejad complained that the U.S. and a few other "monopolistic powers,
selfish powers" were trying to deny Iranians their "right" to develop
nukes.
Wild applause.
Ahmadinejad repeatedly refused to answer whether he seeks the destruction
of the state of Israel.
Wild applause.
He accused the U.S. of supporting terrorism.
Wild applause.
Only when Ahmadinejad failed to endorse sodomy did he receive the single
incident of booing throughout his speech.
Responding to a question about Iran's execution of homosexuals,
Ahmadinejad said there are no homosexuals in Iran: "In Iran we don't have
homosexuals, like in your country. In Iran we do not have this phenomenon.
I don't know who's told you that we have it."
I already knew that from looking at his outfit. If liberals want to run
this guy for president, they better get him to "Queer Eye for the
Islamofascist Guy."
COPYRIGHT 2007 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
4520 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111
Sarah Campbell
Briefer, International Custom Intelligence Services
Stratfor, Strategic Forecasting
T: 703.469.2182 ex: 2186
F: 703.469.2189
C: 732.614.8033
www.stratfor.com
sarah.campbell@stratfor.com