The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2177
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Re: [CT] DISCUSSION GERMANY/CT-The Story Behind Germany's Terror Threat

Released on 2012-08-12 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 2018116
Date | 2010-11-22 18:33:28
From | ben.west@stratfor.com
To | ct@stratfor.com
List-Name | ct@stratfor.com

I agree that the spiegel article was good - but this is the kind of thing
we've seen over and over again in Europe. Source from durkastan says that
aq is going to target Europe and kill lots of people and that attackers
are en route. Everyone gets freaked out. Nothing significant happens.
Europe blames US of scare mongering.
Certainly islamists have europe in their cross-hairs, but if an attack is
going to happen, it's not going be preceded by this kind of publicity.
Also, attacking the reichstag? I mean, it's possible to ATTACK it, but
they've got a pretty heavy security presence there that would prevent a
hostage situation. I was there a few years ago. The public entryway is
confined to one doorway with a heavy guard presence, metal detectors,
x-ray machines, etc. If anything, an attack could kill lots of tourists
lined up outside, but it would take a very serious force to be able to
gain entrance to the reichstag and an even more well trained force to
actually hold hostages. This sounds like a pipe-dream to me.
On 11/22/2010 11:04 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
thoughts?
On 11/22/10 11:00 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
It is up to you and CT how you approach this. On the short-term, this
looks like something you can handle without me. If you want to dabble
in the more long-term view of what is going on here, I would love to
help.
On 11/22/10 10:58 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
In the more long-term, I think an analysis of the German
intelligence agencies would be good too. They have been pretty
decimated by the Cold War and by all the problems associated with
running an intelligence agency in a post-Gestapo country. If Germany
is ever going to become a world power again, however, they would
need to overcome these deamons as well. That is sort of the last
straw for Germany, the one that is going to be most sensitive to
overcome. But perhaps this case may illustrate how they are already
overcoming these issues.
On 11/22/10 10:50 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
Main problem is that Der Spiegel is just that good, they've at
least touched on most of what I would want to say about it. The
main thing here is how the politics of a terror threat/alert
coincide with the reality of the threat itself.
We saw that Germany was fairly relaxed bout the earlier threat in
Europe released by the US. I'm not sure if that was the same as
the info that the FBI passed over about this shia group, Saif (I
don't know anything about them). But something changed, as we
noted last week in their interpretation. That seems to go down to
this virtual walk-in. The one thing I was left confused about is
whether BKA had ever been in contact with this source before. It
sounds like he cold called them. It's common knowledge that
walk-ins, rather than recruits, are nearly always the best
sources. But at the same time, they are very suspicious as double
agents. If this was a US source they would be freaking the fuck
out after having Al-Balawi turn on them. The germans seem to have
cooler heads, but they will be working 24/7 to verify the source
(let me make another plug for John Lecarre's A Most Wanted Man
here, most of his career was in Germany).
They've clearly got enough corroborating information that they
consider this a real threat. But politically they are faced with
the universal 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' alert
problem. If the Interior ministry doesn't say something, they
will be liable if an attack occurs. Look at the constant press
over information on the warning intelligence for Mumbai. As we've
said before, simply issuing the warning may help to deter the
attackers.
The real important bit here, is that it seems the germans have
fairly good intelligence. While this attack is still not
happening tomorrow, they have a lot of details about what might be
in the works, rather than a single-source intercept that indicates
some vague threat. It seems they've increased security pretty
well at the Bundestag, and want to add to the presence at any
possible target. This is where we seem them scrambling, and where
their intelligence holes are.
The task now for the germans is to verify this source. Maybe even
pick him up and put him on ice somewhere (Fred/Stick?), not in
GErmany but in Pakistan/Afghanistan. That will require some
cooperation with either/both the Americans and Pakistanis. They
also need to verify all the bio information they have on these 4-6
guys trying to get into germany and watch travelers very
carefully. The germans seem to be very good at surveilling these
threats within Germany, so their best luck may come when one of
the guys overseas contacts a local already under surveillance.
At minimum, this could be a pretty interesting tearline this
week. Both the walk-in issues and the CIA/FBI liaison conflicts
that I havne't gotten into here.
On 11/22/10 10:34 AM, Marko Papic wrote:
Any thoughts on where you guys are thinking of going with this?
Der Spiegel article is indeed interesting.
On 11/22/10 9:28 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
Great report from Der Spiegel (thanks Mikey). I suggest
anyone interested to read the whole thing. They ask the right
questions, and while not as much detail as I hoped, give us a
much better understanding on the threat in Germany.
The BKA (germany's FBI) must be extremely busy verifying the
details of this virtual walk-in. It obviously caused the
germans to shit their pants. But the real questions are
buried in the article---how real was this plot, how real is
the source, is the source just trying to get back to the land
of brezeln and bier? Trying to double-cross them somehow?
Also note the tip off from the FBI (cue fred), not the usual
CIA liaison with BND.
For Eurasia, there's a lot in here on the internal politics of
the interior minister position, and the relation between state
and federal government.
On 11/22/10 8:55 AM, Michael Wilson wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [OS] GERMANY/CT-The Story Behind Germany's Terror
Threat
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:38:21 -0600
From: Graham Smith <graham.smith@stratfor.com>
Reply-To: The OS List <os@stratfor.com>
To: os@stratfor.com
11/22/2010 11:38 AM
Fears of a Mumbai Redux
The Story Behind Germany's Terror Threat
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,730377,00.html
By Matthias Bartsch, Yassin Musharbash and Holger Stark
Germany is currently in a state of high alert. Security
officials are warning that they have concrete information
pointing to a possible terror attack on the federal
parliament building in Berlin, a massively popular tourist
attraction. The days of Interior Minister Thomas de
Maiziere's reserved stances in dealing with such warnings
appear to be over.
The call came from abroad, and the man speaking hurriedly on
the other end of the line sounded as if he feared for his
life. He wanted out, he told the officers of the German
Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) -- out of the terrorist
scene. He wanted to come back to Germany, back to his
family. Then he asked if German officials could help him.
Right now, they're trying to do just that. The BKA is
pursuing the case under the codename "Nova." The apparently
remorseful man could be an important possible whistleblower
from a dangerous region of the globe. In fact, he is also
the most recent reason why German Interior Minister Thomas
de Maiziere put the entire country in a state of fright on
Wednesday.
During a hastily called press conference that day, de
Maiziere stated that Germany faced the threat of terrorist
attacks that might be launched against the country at some
point in November. As he put it, Germany is "presently
dealing with a new situation."
Just two days earlier, the source had called for the third
time in just a short period and provided more information.
He told officials that a small group of terrorists wanted to
conduct a raid on the Reichstag building in Berlin, which
houses the federal parliament, and that that was only one of
the targets included in their attack plans.
Germany on High Alert
Since then, Germany has been in a state of high alert. The
Reichstag is surrounded with barricades and its popular
cupola tourist attraction temporarily closed to visitors.
Police armed with submachine guns are patrolling major
railway stations and airports. And vacations have been
called off for officials at the country's security agencies.
Wherever they have cause for doing so, the authorities are
secretly monitoring communications, conducting surveillance
operations and launching undercover investigations. At the
moment, investigators seem to be at a loss; their modus
operandi: "We'll prod the shrubs and see if we can flush out
any birds."
"There is cause for worry, but no cause for hysteria," de
Maiziere assured his listeners. But while he has never been
much of an agitator, his colleagues at the state level have
described the situation in much more drastic terms. Uwe
Schu:nemann, for example, who has been the interior minister
of the northwestern state of Lower Saxony since 2003, stated
that he had "never experienced a heightened security
situation like this one." And Berlin Senator for the
Interior Ehrhart Ko:rting, whose position is tantamount to
that of a government minister in the city-state, has already
even gone so far as to call on the inhabitants of the German
capital city to report suspicious-looking individuals of
Arab origin to the police. "If you suddenly see three
somewhat strange-looking men who are new to your
neighborhood, who hide their faces and who only speak
Arabic," Ko:rting said, "you should report them to the
authorities."
Under heightened pressure, officials in Germany's 16 federal
states are now checking to see when and where major events
are scheduled to take place this coming week within their
boundaries. And nothing suggested as a possible target is
being discounted, no matter how unlikely. For example,
officials in Rhineland-Palatinate warned the state's
interior minister, Karl Peter Burch, that there was always a
lot going on at IKEA stores on Saturdays.[WTF]
Serenity, Scaremongering and Strategy
Since last week, German politicians at both the state and
federal levels have once again had to figure out how they
will handle themselves when making warnings about terrorist
attacks. They have had to come up with a language that can
simultaneously convey both an alert and a sense of calm.
This is no easy task. For one thing, this isn't the first
time this has happened. In September 2009, for example,
right before federal elections were held, there were
concrete threats that resulted in a heightened security
situation. But, in the end, nothing happened. This time
around, people are wondering whether they are on the
precipice of an emergency or whether these are once again
empty threats.
Still, one thing is certain: For the time being, Germany has
become a different country -- more nervous, more anxious,
more agitated. And Germany's domestic security policies are
being put to the test.
When Interior Minister de Maiziere assumed his office in
October 2009 in conservative Chancellor Angela Merkel's
government, he aimed to cool down the heated sense of alarm
regularly fanned out by his predecessors. What's more, the
man who had served as Merkel's chief of staff in Chancellery
until being moved to the role of interior minister in her
new government, was given the task of nurturing a more
relaxed relationship between her party, the Christian
Democratic Union (CDU), and its new coalition partner, the
business-friendly Free Democratic Party (FDP). In
particular, it was his job to not draw out the long-standing
conflict over domestic security policies with the Justice
Ministry, which has been led since the 2009 election by
Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, a member of the FDP.
Indeed, Merkel feared that the quarrelsome FDP might try to
capitalize on the issue to win over more voters, so she
assigned de Maiziere to prevent that from happening.
In fact, the plan was to repeat the same strategy that the
CDU and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social
Union (CSU), had used when they were in the so-called "grand
coalition" with the center-left Social Democratic Party,
between 2005 and 2009. At the time, they made a point of
undermining the SPD by championing what had traditionally
been the latter party's issues.
A Game-Changer
But now the game plan has changed. This November will
drastically alter de Maiziere's understanding of his role in
office. If he tries to return things to their previous state
of calm, he's going to have a very tough time. In fact, it's
much more likely that he will be a completely different
interior minister.
For a while now, de Maiziere's softer stance has prompted
opposition by politicians on the right involved with
domestic security issues. But they are now calling louder
than ever for a tougher course to be followed. Merkel is
also adjusting to the new situation and is reportedly happy
with the way de Maiziere handled himself last week.
Likewise, no one seems to have voiced any criticism last
Thursday evening during a meeting of the Coalition
Committee, a regular gathering of the parties that are part
of the government.
The almost complete lack of protest has a lot to do with
where the alarming information is coming from. In fact,
information regarding the supposedly imminent attacks has
come from two independent sources. Shortly before receiving
the telephone call about the planned attacks, BKA officials
had received a cable from their American counterparts at the
FBI, America's federal police force, warning of possible
attacks.
Still, what truth is there in these "security-related"
pieces of information coming from both domestic and foreign
sources? And, given all the discrepancies in the warning
messages, just how much do they deserve to be trusted?
Indeed, even among security officials themselves, there is
some doubt about how legitimate these statements are -- and
about just how acute the danger threatening Germany really
is.
An Attack Modelled after Mumbai[plot details in this
section]
What the caller reported was undeniably alarming. According
to him, al-Qaida and associated groups based in Pakistan
were making joint preparations for an attack in Germany. One
idea was to remotely detonate a bomb using a mobile phone.
Another called for a small group of terrorists to storm the
Reichstag with guns blazing, take hostages and end
everything in one calamitous bloodbath. Indeed, BKA
officials learned that the latter plan had been modeled on
the storming of luxury hotels in Mumbai, the Indian capital,
almost exactly two years ago, in a massacre that left 175
people dead.
According to the caller, the plan called for the terrorists
to procure the submachine guns, automatic rifles, explosives
and whatever else they would need to storm Germany's
parliament building in the Balkans. He said that two men had
already traveled to Germany six to eight weeks earlier,
adding that one had the nom de guerre of "Abu Mohammed" and
that the other one was a German of Turkish origin. Both
apparently had roots in the Greater Berlin metropolitan
area, were currently unemployed and living off of welfare
payments and had immersed themselves in the anonymity
provided by a major city -- until the time should come for
their activation.
Likewise, there were allegedly four other volunteers --
including a German, a Turk, a North African and another
jihadist of unknown identity -- in the training camps run by
al-Qaida and related groups waiting for the signal to travel
to Germany. And, according to the telephone source,
al-Qaida's plan was to attack in February or March.
The only question now relates to just how credible the
caller's statements are. He is an insider who joined up with
armed groups several months ago and has earned a reputation
as a fanatic fighter.
But could it be that he is only trying to tell German
officials the juiciest things possible in order to raise his
own market value and thereby prompt them to extract him from
the terror scene? Or could it be that al-Qaida is even
planning a second spectacular coup like the one in December
2009, when the Americans allowed a supposedly top-level
turncoat onto an American military base without any sort of
pat-down, who went on to detonate his explosive vest and
blow seven CIA officials to bits?
A Strange Message
A clear picture has yet to emerge. And one reason for this
is also the fact that it was only two weeks ago that the FBI
first decided to share information about another possible
attack with German officials.
In this case, even the way contact was made was unusual.
Under normal circumstances, liaisons from the CIA station in
Germany are the ones to communicate American warnings to
their German counterparts. But, this time around, it was an
apparently particularly anxious FBI that chose to directly
notify the BKA.
The FBI told the Germans about an obscure Indian group
called "Saif," or "sword." Despite being a Shiite group, it
had allegedly made a pact with al-Qaida, a Sunni
organization, and sent five of its men to the Pakistani
province of Waziristan for training. According to the FBI,
two volunteers -- who were already equipped with visas
allowing them to travel freely within the 25 European
countries belonging to the Schengen zone -- were supposedly
already en route to Germany and would enter the United Arab
Emirates on Monday, Nov. 22. There, they would allegedly be
provided with new travel documents before traveling on to
Germany. One of the men is supposedly named "Khan," which is
about as common in that part of the world as "Smith" is in
English-speaking countries. And no firm conclusion had been
made about their nationalities.
The FBI agents even named the presumed masterminds behind
the operation. A certain Mushtaq Altaf Bin-Khadri, who is in
charge of finances and training for "Saif," allegedly
dispatched the terrorist squad. But the FBI was not in a
position to comment on the targets of the two men in
Germany.
One name came up time and again in the communique, and one
that pricked the Germans' ears: Dawood Ibrahim. The
54-year-old arms trader is "India's most-wanted man." The US
government has listed him as a "global terrorist" and
persuaded the United Nations to place his name on a list of
supporters of terror. Ibrahim is rumored to be the head of
D-Company, a criminal syndicate named after himself, and is
believed to be in charge of smuggling the suspected
terrorists into Germany.
Both the FBI and the BKA are attaching a lot of importance
to the information in the FBI communique. But the
intelligence services of the two countries -- the CIA in the
United States and the BND and Office for the Protection of
the Constitution in Germany, the country's foreign and
domestic intelligence agencies, respectively -- point to
internal contradictions as reasons for their skepticism. As
they see it, for example, it is highly unlikely that a
Shiite group would team up with Sunni terrorists, especially
since a good part of al-Qaida propaganda vilifies Shiites.
Other reasons for doubt include the facts that none of the
intelligence agencies was previously familiar with an
organization called "Saif," that there have been no
previously recorded threats against Germany by Indian
extremists, and that the whole scenario seems rather
implausible.
On the other hand, the FBI information is uncommonly
concrete. In addition to the names of the suspects, it also
provides information about the exact day on which they are
supposed to arrive in the United Arab Emirates. Moreover,
Ibrahim is believed to be one of the men behind the terror
attacks in Mumbai. If he really is involved, that alone
would be reason enough for worry.
Abnormal Circumstances
Under normal circumstances, a message of this kind from the
United States would no doubt be cause for serious-minded
scrutiny, but it would not be a cause for alarm. For
example, the BKA would go through all recent visa
applications, and federal police officers would take a
closer look at all the people entering Germany from Arab
states. And the intelligence services would make the rounds
to see if any of its partners had any helpful information on
the matter.
Indeed, under normal circumstances, there are always a lot
of these communiques, most of which turn out to be false
alarms. But these are no normal circumstances. Germany is in
a state of emergency. Other countries, such as the United
States, employ a system of official warning levels based on
color codes that change -- from yellow to orange, for
example -- when the danger level is thought to increase.
But, in Germany, the interior minister is the barometer: He
consults with experts -- and then it is he who must call the
shots.
For the minister, a situation like this presents a dilemma.
If he remains silent and something happens, he's a failure.
If he makes loud warning and nothing happens, he's just a
rabble-rouser trying to push through controversial tougher
security laws. And, of course, the public never thanks you
if everyday life continues in a normal, peaceful way.
Absolute Security Remains a Pipe Dream
When de Maiziere became Germany's interior minister, he had
planned to lead the ministry in a level-headed way. For
example, he prefers to use phrases such as "internal calm"
rather than "internal security." And it was only six weeks
ago that he uttered the sentence: "There's no cause for
alarm." But, since then, the chorus of warning voices has
only ballooned in size.
This change in course is the combined result of everything
that happened beforehand. It might very well turn out that
the alleged Indian terror squad stays home and that the raid
on the Reichstag never happens. But what will remain is a
well-founded supposition that there is a critical mass of
terrorists in the border region between Afghanistan and
Pakistan that is thinking about launching attacks in Europe
-- and certainly in Germany, as well.
Raw Nerves
Given such circumstances, there is a major sense of alarm
among German officials. Last Thursday, just a day after de
Maiziere's shocking press conference, the BKA issued a press
release "in connection with the current high-risk
situation." It reported that a piece of suspicious luggage
had been discovered a day earlier in Windhoek, the capital
of Namibia, before being loaded onto a plane bound for
Germany. The laptop bag contained batteries, wires, a
detonator and a clock -- in other words, all the ingredients
you need for a potential airborne catastrophe.
It sounded as if another terror plot had been foiled. Had
there been a plan to blow up Air Berlin Flight 7377 en route
to Munich? And had the authorities, yet again, discovered an
explosive device at the last minute? In the end, all the
worry was unfounded. As it turned out, the piece of luggage
was a test device built by a company that designs "real
test" suitcases to be used to test security measures. It
remains unclear who checked the bag in. But the fact that
the BKA was so quick to go into alarm mode -- and publicly
so -- has been a communications debacle.
Of course, these days, nobody wants to be the one that
wasn't sufficiently circumspect, the one who took too long
to speak up. No one wants a replay of situations like the
one from the beginning of November, when de Maiziere didn't
know for hours whether the package that had arrived at the
Chancellery contained actual explosives or was just a false
alarm. Now, the threshold for sounding the alarm is already
much lower.
Bonded by Fear
Of course, you can never be too sure. Over the last 12
months, a series of attacks concocted in the
Afghan-Pakistani border region have been foiled in the West.
For example, in May, a car bomb set in New York's Times
Square by a man with ties to the Pakistani Taliban failed to
properly detonate. In Copenhagen, al-Qaida had made plans to
storm the offices of the Jyllands-Posten newspaper as
revenge for its 2005 publishing of caricatures of the
Prophet Muhammad. In October 2009, David Headley, an
American citizen with Pakistani roots, was arrested after
having already visited the newspaper's offices in order to
scout them out before the planned attack. Other targets
reportedly included the subway systems of New York City and
Washington.
On the other hand, absolute security is a pipe dream. For
example, British authorities had even conducted rehearsals
for how to respond to possible attacks. But, even so, when
attacks claiming 56 lives (including those of four
attackers) did strike London, on July 7, 2005, they were
unable to prevent them. Likewise, US intelligence services
had warned India a number of times that terrorists were
planning attacks in Mumbai.
The new situation in Germany has at least had one positive
side effect: For the time being, the traditionally
quarrelsome interior ministers from both the state and the
federal levels have refrained from their usual bickering.
Following informal talks held last Thursday in Hamburg,
Minister Bruch of Rhineland-Palatinate noted that he had
"never experienced such harmony within this group" that has
apparently been bonded together by their shared fear.
Translated from the German by Josh Ward
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marko Papic
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
STRATFOR
700 Lavaca Street - 900
Austin, Texas
78701 USA
P: + 1-512-744-4094
marko.papic@stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Tactical Analyst
Office: +1 512-279-9479
Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com
--
Ben West
Tactical Analyst
STRATFOR
Austin, TX