The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2164
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## The Assange Arrest and WikiLeaks' Survival

Released on 2012-08-15 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1328899
Date | 2010-12-07 18:38:06
From | noreply@stratfor.com
To | allstratfor@stratfor.com

Stratfor logo
The Assange Arrest and WikiLeaks' Survival
December 7, 2010 | 1646 GMT
The Assange Arrest and WikiLeaks' Survival
FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty Images
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange at the United Nations office in Geneva
on Nov. 5
Summary
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange surrendered to authorities in Britain
on Dec. 7, following an Interpol Red Notice based on a Swedish arrest
warrant. WikiLeaks is a relatively young organization with one leader
and has not institutionalized a set of practices and protocols that
guarantee its survival even if the personnel changes. Assange's arrest
will test the organization's ability to maintain itself, but the use of
the Internet to leak documents will continue.
Analysis
Related Special Topic Page
* The WikiLeaks Releases
London Metropolitan police arrested Julian Assange, the founder and
public spokesman for WikiLeaks, at 9:30 a.m. local time on Dec. 7 after
Assange turned himself in. He is due to appear in a court in Westminster
soon over sexual assault charges filed against him in Sweden, and faces
possible extradition.
There is considerable interest in what his arrest will mean for his
organization. WikiLeaks organized a new method for an old practice -
leaking confidential government information in an attempt to influence
politics. And while Assange's arrest could disrupt the long-term
viability of WikiLeaks, it will not stop the release of the current
batch of diplomatic cables in the short term, nor will it stop similar
future leaks via the Internet.
Leadership is extremely important in nongovernmental organizations that
have not institutionalized to the point where their dominant figures are
replaceable and members can adapt to changing circumstance. From
terrorist groups to charities, new organizations often rise and fall
with their founders. Assange created WikiLeaks with himself as the only
public face - he leads supporters, drives donations, gives interviews
and faces the resulting criticism. There have been reports of internal
dissent and tensions, and in one interview with CNN, a discussion of the
organization's internal politics seemed to touch a nerve with Assange.
If Assange were to face charges in Sweden for sexual assault or new
charges in the United Kingdom or the United States and was found guilty,
WikiLeaks would still need someone to oversee it. Assange may have
someone ready to fill the leadership void, but there has been no
evidence of this.
In addition to having its leadership threatened, WikiLeaks has suffered
logistically. As national governments put pressure on its
infrastructure, its web server has been shut down, and most important, a
major source of funding, PayPal, has closed WikiLeaks' account (Visa and
Mastercard have also banned payments from their cards to WikiLeaks). It
is also possible the events of the past few months will deter other
potential leakers from approaching WikiLeaks as opposed to other
organizations (especially if they dislike or disagree with Assange).
Moreover, this new set of documents has not been greeted with the
reaction Assange expected - the U.S. public is not angry at the State
Department, but many are angry at Assange and his organization.
Immediately following Assange's arrest, a WikiLeaks spokesman said the
arrest would not stop the group's operations. Indeed, whether Assange
remains behind bars or not, it most likely will not stop the continued
release of the 250,000 U.S. State Department cables, only a fraction of
which have been released thus far. It also will not shut down WikiLeaks,
which still maintains its website - albeit currently on a Swiss server,
after its initial U.S.-hosted servers were deactivated - and the ability
to collect information from leakers. So in the short term, WikiLeaks
will persist. The question remains if Assange created a truly
sustainable institution.
If Assange is extradited to Sweden and tried on one count of unlawful
coercion, two counts of sexual molestation and one count of rape, it is
not clear to what degree the image of WikiLeaks will be damaged; thus
far Assange has cultivated the site as an extension of his persona, and
even without the assault charges he is not held in high repute. The
extradition process could take months or even years, and he may try to
use prison time to develop his image as a martyr for free speech, but
this can backfire. If WikiLeaks, however, is not tied to his image, it
will be much more sustainable as an organization.
Western governments also fear whatever is contained in his "insurance"
file, a 1.4-gigabyte computer file that has already been distributed to
many thousands of people over the Internet. Assange has threatened to
release the encryption password if something happens to him. As STRATFOR
has stated before, WikiLeaks likely led with its most insightful
documents, and thus those saved in the insurance file are probably less
enlightening than they are damaging. The file may contain no new
information at all, but simply the names and information on sources,
diplomats, military and intelligence officers not already disclosed.
Such a release could put these individuals' jobs or even lives at risk.
However, such a release exposing these individuals in a vindictive
manner could further tarnish Assange and WikiLeaks in the eyes of the
international public, to include potential financial and information
contributors. Beyond that, governments will almost certainly take
stronger measures against WikiLeaks if it does release identities of
classified sources or officers.
WikiLeaks is now facing a conundrum that all new organizations face at
some point - the ability to maintain and transition leadership through
adverse circumstances. Assange may be released quickly, but if he is
not, WikiLeaks' survival will be in question. However, even if WikiLeaks
disappears, the organizational concept will continue, and leaks along
with it. WikiLeaks has only demonstrated the ability new technology has
created to transfer large quantities of documents, and there is no
reason other organizations will not make use of the same technology.
Give us your thoughts Read comments on
on this report other reports
For Publication Reader Comments
Not For Publication
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
(c) Copyright 2010 Stratfor. All rights reserved.