The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2151
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Re: Thoughts on Der Spiegel?

Released on 2012-08-11 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1132153
Date | 2010-01-25 20:35:56
From | sean.noonan@stratfor.com
To | analysts@stratfor.com
List-Name | analysts@stratfor.com

Other media reports that the new intelligence itself came from BND (other
than just the laptop which the article mentions). I bet it was leaked by
them or IAEA in Vienna.
Marko Papic wrote:
To answer Reva's question, this is certainly something that could be
assumed. Mossad and German intelligence have grown close over the years,
especially following the fiasco in Munich. On the other hand, Der
Spiegel usually does very good in depth analyses and investigative work.
Best at that in Germany. In that way, it has a very good tradition of
investigative journalism similar to the Guardian (although it is a
weekly, not a daily like the Guardian).
Kamran Bokhari wrote:
If you are going by what defectors tell you then it is also reasonable to
assume that the Iranians have moved things around since the defections.
-----Original Message-----
From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com]
On Behalf Of Fred Burton
Sent: January-25-10 1:43 PM
To: Analyst List
Subject: Re: Thoughts on Der Spiegel?
Western experts believe that this center developed into a
sub-organization of the Defense Ministry known as the FEDAT, an acronym
for the "Department for Expanded High-Technology Applications" -- the
secret heart of Iran's nuclear weapons program. The head of that
organization is Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, 48, an officer in the Revolutionary
Guard and a professor at Tehran's Imam Hossein University.
** This kind of granularity is critical.
Reva Bhalla wrote:
Any thoughts on Der Spiegel as an outlet for Mossad or any other
intelligence agencies? Have we seen examples of this in the past? They
have some insane detail here (read the second half) where they claim
they've got all this access to a classified doc on Iran's nuclear
weapons program
01/25/2010
The Secret Nuclear Dossier
Intelligence from Tehran Elevates Concern in the West
By Dieter Bednarz, Erich Follath and Holger Stark
*The West has long been suspicous of Iran's nuclear program. SPIEGEL has
obtained new documents on secret tests and leadership structures that
call into question Tehran's claims to be exclusively interested in the
peaceful use of the technology.*
It was probably the last attempt to defuse the nuclear dispute with
Tehran without having to turn to dramatic new sanctions or military
action. The plan, devised at the White House in October, had Russian and
Chinese support and came with the seal of approval of the US president.
It was clearly a Barack Obama operation.
Under the plan, Iran would send a large share of its low enriched
uranium abroad, all at once, for a period of one year, receiving
internationally monitored quantities of nuclear fuel elements in return.
It was a deal that provided benefits for all sides. The Iranians would
have enough material for what they claim is their civilian nuclear
program, as well as for scientific experiments, and the world could be
assured that Tehran would not be left with enough fissile material for
its secret domestic uranium enrichment program -- and for what the West
assumes is the building of a nuclear bomb.
PHOTO GALLERY
* <http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-51080.html>
* <http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-51080.html>
* <http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-51080.html>
3 Photos
*Photo Gallery:* Iran's Nuclear Program
<http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-51080.html>
Tehran's leaders initially agreed to the proposal "in principle." But
for weeks they put off the international community with vague allusions
to a "final response," and when that response finally materialized, it
came in the form of a "counter-proposal." Under this proposal, Tehran
insisted that the exchange could not take place all at once, but only in
stages, and that the material would not be sent abroad. Instead, Tehran
wanted the exchange to take place in Iran.
Once again, the Iranian leadership has rebuffed the West with phony
promises of its willingness to compromise. The government in Tehran
officially rejected the nuclear exchange plan last Tuesday. To make
matters worse, after the West's discovery of a secret uranium enrichment
plant near Qom, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad defiantly announced that
he would never give in, and in fact would build 10 more enrichment
plants instead.
*Highly Volatile Material*
But officials in Washington and European capitals are currently not as
concerned about these cocky, unrealistic announcements as they are about
intelligence reports based on sources within Iran and information from
high-ranking defectors. The new information, say American experts, will
likely prompt the US government to reassess the risks coming from the
mullah-controlled country in the coming days and raise the alarm level
from yellow to red. Skeptics who in the past, sometimes justifiably so,
treated alarmist reports as Israeli propaganda, are also extremely
worried. They include the experts from the United Nations International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), whose goal is prevent the spread of nuclear
weapons.
After an extensive internal investigation, IAEA officials concluded that
a computer obtained from Iran years ago contains highly volatile
material. The laptop reached the Americans through Germany's foreign
intelligence agency, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), and was then
passed on to the IAEA in Vienna.
Reports by Ali Reza Asgari, Iran's former deputy defense minister who
managed to defect to the United States, where he was given a new
identity, proved to be just as informative. Nuclear scientist Shahram
Amiri, who "disappeared" during a pilgrimage to Mecca in June 2009, is
also believed to have particularly valuable information. The Iranian
authorities accused Saudi Arabia and the United States of kidnapping the
expert, but it is more likely that he defected.
Iran's government has come under pressure as a result of the new
charges. They center on the question of who exactly is responsible for
the country's nuclear program -- and what this says about its true
nature. The government has consistently told the IAEA that the only
agency involved in uranium enrichment is the National Energy Council,
and that its work was exclusively dedicated to the peaceful use of the
technology.
But if the claims are true that have been made in an intelligence
dossier currently under review in diplomatic circles in Washington,
Vienna, Tel Aviv and Berlin, portions of which SPIEGEL has obtained,
this is a half-truth at best.
According to the classified document, there is a secret military branch
of Iran's nuclear research program that answers to the Defense Ministry
and has clandestine structures. The officials who have read the dossier
conclude that the government in Tehran is serious about developing a
bomb, and that its plans are well advanced. There are two names that
appear again and again in the documents, particularly in connection with
the secret weapons program: Kamran Daneshjoo and Mohsen Fakhrizadeh.
*Secret Heart of Iran's Nuclear Weapons Program*
Daneshjoo, 52, Iran's new minister of science, research and technology,
is also responsible for the country's nuclear energy agency, and he is
seen as a close ally of Ahmadinejad. Opposition leaders say he is a
hardliner who was partly responsible for the apparently rigged
presidential election in June. Daneshjoo's biography includes only
marginal references to his possible nuclear expertise. In describing
himself, the man with the steely-gray beard writes that he studied
engineering in the British city of Manchester, and then spent several
years working at a Tehran "Center for Aviation Technology." Western
experts believe that this center developed into a sub-organization of
the Defense Ministry known as the FEDAT, an acronym for the "Department
for Expanded High-Technology Applications" -- the secret heart of Iran's
nuclear weapons program. The head of that organization is Mohsen
Fakhrizadeh, 48, an officer in the Revolutionary Guard and a professor
at Tehran's Imam Hossein University.
Western intelligence agencies believe that although the nuclear energy
agency and the FEDAT compete in some areas, they have agreed to a
division of labor on the central issue of nuclear weapons research, with
the nuclear agency primarily supervising uranium enrichment while the
FEDAT is involved in the construction of a nuclear warhead to be used in
Iran's Shahab missiles. Experts believe that Iran's scientists could
produce a primitive, truck-sized version of the bomb this year, but that
it would have to be compressed to a size that would fit into a nuclear
warhead to yield the strategic threat potential that has Israel and the
West so alarmed -- and that they could reach that stage by sometime
between 2012 and 2014.
The Iranians are believed to have conducted non-nuclear tests of a
detonating mechanism for a nuclear bomb more than six years ago. The
challenge in the technology is to uniformly ignite the conventional
explosives surrounding the uranium core -- which is needed to produce
the desired chain reaction. It is believed that the test series was
conducted with a warhead encased in aluminum. In other words, everything
but the core was "real." According to the reports, the Tehran engineers
used thin fibers and a measuring circuit board in place of the fissile
material. This enabled them to measure the shock waves and photograph
flashes that simulate the detonation of a nuclear bomb with some degree
of accuracy. The results were apparently so encouraging that the Iranian
government has since classified the technology as "feasible."
SPIEGEL obtained access to a FEDAT organizational chart and a list of
the names of scientists working for the agency. The Vienna-based IAEA
also has these documents, but the Iranian president claims that they are
forged and are being used to discredit his country. After reporting two
years ago that the Iranians had frozen their nuclear weapons research in
2003, the CIA and other intelligence agencies will probably paint a
significantly more sobering scenario just as the UN Security Council is
considering tougher sanctions against Iran.
*Mulling Sanctions*
When France assumes the Council's rotating chairmanship in February,
Washington could push for a showdown. While Moscow is not ruling out
additional punitive measures, China, which has negotiated billions in
energy deals with Iran, is more likely to block such measures.
China could, however, approve "smart" sanctions, such as travel
restrictions for senior members of the Revolutionary Guard and nuclear
scientists. Fakhrizadeh is already on a list of officials subject to
such restrictions, and Daneshjoo could well be added in the future.
But the West would presumably be on its own when enforcing sanctions
that would be truly harmful to Iran -- and to its own, profitable trade
relations with Tehran. The most effective trade weapon would be a fuel
embargo. Because of a lack of refinery capacity Iran, which has the
world's second-largest oil reserves, imports almost half of the gasoline
it uses. Sanctions would trigger a sharp rise in the price of gasoline,
inevitably leading to social unrest. Experts are divided over whether it
would be directed against the unpopular regime or if the country's
leaders could once again inflame the Iranian people against the "evil
West."
This leaves the military option. Apart from the political consequences
and the possibility of counter-attacks, bombing Iran's nuclear
facilities would be extremely difficult. The nuclear experts have
literally buried themselves and their facilities underground, in
locations that would be virtually impossible to reach with conventional
weapons.
While even Israeli experts are skeptical over how much damage bombing
the facilities could do to the nuclear program, the normally levelheaded
US General David Petraeus sounded downright belligerent when asked
whether the Iranian nuclear facilities could be attacked militarily.
"Well, they certainly can be bombed," he said just two weeks ago in
Washington.
/Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan/
--
Marko Papic
STRATFOR
Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
700 Lavaca Street, Suite 900
Austin, TX 78701 - U.S.A
TEL: + 1-512-744-4094
FAX: + 1-512-744-4334
marko.papic@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Sean Noonan
Analyst Development Program
Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
www.stratfor.com