The Global Intelligence Files - [OS] MORE*: MORE*: G3* - IRAN/UN/MIL - Iran IAEA report leaked

The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
1966
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## [OS] MORE*: MORE*: G3* - IRAN/UN/MIL - Iran IAEA report leaked

Released on 2012-08-15 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 2556418
Date | 2011-11-08 17:05:21
From | marc.lanthemann@stratfor.com
To | alerts@stratfor.com
List-Name | os@stratfor.com

Next few hours? I thought it was tomorrow. It is an Iranian source after
all. [yp]
IAEA Chief to Release US-Worded Report on Iran in Hours
11/8/11
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9007272576
TEHRAN (FNA)- The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Director-General, Yukiya Amano, is due to release the UN nuclear
watchdog's latest report on Iran's nuclear activities in the next few
hours, while many even in the West believe that the report carries the US
tone and wording on an IAEA paper.
The western diplomats and sources had informed around a month ago that
this report would contain some documents which have been presented to the
IAEA by certain western countries and would show that Iran is pursuing a
military drive in its nuclear program.
Amano has reportedly attached a 15-page annexation to his report which
will focus on the issue of Iran's alleged studies in the field of military
nuclear activities.
Diplomats in Tehran say Amano received the last orders from Washington on
this report during his last week trip to the US and that's why he shrugged
off the last week demands by Russia, China and some European countries as
well as the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) member states that he respect UN
impartiality and adopt a fair approach towards Iran's nuclear issue in his
coming report.
Nuclear experts both in Tehran and the IAEA Secretariat believe that the
annexation won't be defendable from technical and legal perspectives and
will "rapidly turn into a crisis for the IAEA" and will discredit the UN
body.
A look at the following points would show the shallow depth and
unreliability of Amano's upcoming report on Iran:
1- None of the documents presented in the November 2011 report is new and
all of them are related to the contents of a laptop computer which the
US-led West alleges to have been stolen from Iran and was brought up first
in 2004. In fact the release of these documents show that Amano - despite
his claims - has no up-to-date information or data about the alleged
studies and his information is what was presented in 2004. This proves
that all IAEA allegations and claims in its recent reports that it has
information to prove Iran has been pursuing a military nuclear drive after
2004 have all been nothing but a lie.
2- Neither Iran nor the IAEA has ever witnessed these documents. Since
2007, both Iran and the IAEA have been demanding that the original version
of these so-called documents be presented to an independent team to go
under veracity checks, but Americans have always refrained from doing so.
This lack of cooperation annoyed the former IAEA Chief, Mohamed ElBaradei,
so deeply that he repeatedly accused Americans of non-compliance with the
IAEA safeguard tasks and undertakings. More importantly, Americans
apparently have only one electronic file and do not have any original
document. In fact, there is no original document in the case of the
alleged studies. Iran proved to the IAEA in a 117-page assessment in 2008
that these so-called documents are fake, but Amano makes no reference to
Iran's assessment in his report.
3- Basically speaking, neither the IAEA nor any other side is able to
prove that these documents are related to Iran, even if we assume they are
authentic. In other words, sowing and compiling a series of texts and
documents in the Persian language and forging a number of seals and
signatures and headings can never prove that these documents really belong
to the state bodies in Iran.
4- There is no document to prove that what the IAEA calls alleged studies
pertain to the use of nuclear materials and the abovementioned documents
are silent in this regard as well. Thus, in case we assume these documents
as authentic, they can pertain to conventional military activities and the
claim that they are related to military nuclear activities is wrong
because it is not supported by any information or evidence.
5- Once again even if we consider these documents to be authentic, all
what they show is a series of computer simulations, and not practice or
activity. It is essentially due to the very same reason that the IAEA has
called this project as "alleged studies". There is no proof in these
documents to show that these studies have been put into practice.
The abovementioned points reveal that the attachment to Amano's upcoming
report is, in fact, not a document in the real sense of the matter, but a
collection of forged information which has been attached to the report
under the US political pressure.
Diplomats say that US Ambassador to the IAEA Glyn Davies has prepared a
16-page report since yesterday and has been personally in contact with the
western media and reporters to brief them on the IAEA report in a bid to
release it with maximum media propaganda and ballyhoo against Iran.
Excerpts of this report which has been released by certain western media
show the same words and statements which have been frequently stated in
IAEA reports since 2004 which were refuted by Iran in its 117-page
assessment in May 2008.
Now Mr. Amano, who according to the documents released by the WikiLeaks
has promised the Americans to check all its measures and appointments with
them, has apparently been given the mission to release the forged
information and materials of the CIA in the form of an IAEA report, while
many experts believe that these documents have been forged very naively
and their release would totally discredit the IAEA.
Experts say that parts of this report, including paragraphs 23 and 24 have
been copy-pasted from the Untied States' 2008 National Intelligence
Estimate (NIE).
In 2007, Washington released the annual National Intelligence Estimate by
16 US intelligence bodies that endorsed the civilian nature of Iran's
programs. The 2007 NIE mentioned that Iran has not been pursuing a
military nuclear activity since 2003. Hence, the report discredited the US
because it undermined Washington's efforts to push further sanctions on
Iran. To make up for this goof, the US alleged in its 2008 NIE that
aspects of these military activities might have been continued after 2003
and now we can see that the same allegations have been copy-pasted from
the 2008 NIE to the 2011 IAEA report on Iran (paragraphs 23 & 24) and Mr.
Director-General has not even bothered to make some minute changes in the
wording of these materials.
Another ridiculous point pertains to paragraphs 47-53 of the coming IAEA
report. In this part of the IAEA report which has actually been written by
the US Ambassador to the IAEA Glyn Davies, Mr. Amano claims that Iran has
carried out a number of hydrodynamic computer simulations for
manufacturing nuclear weapons. It has also been mentioned in this part
that the IAEA has a number of satellite images of a metal bunker used for
nuclear weapons tests in Parchin facility.
These parts of Amano's report are the result of a job carried out by
Ferederic Claude, an agent of the French Intelligence Service, who had
earlier been in charge of satellite imaging at the IAEA and is now Amano's
advisor. It is noteworthy that Claude, accompanied by IAEA Deputy Director
General for Safeguards Olli Heinonen, brought these pictures to Tehran a
few years ago and asked for a visit to Parchin facility. In response, Iran
allowed the IAEA inspectors to visit any part of Parchin that they wanted
and carry out sampling tests. The result of that visit revealed that
first, what Mr. Claude called a metal bunker or container for building
bombs was actually a metal toilet in Parchin, and second the samplings
showed no nuclear activity in Parchin and that's why the IAEA closed the
case with Parchin facility.
On 11/8/11 8:20 AM, Benjamin Preisler wrote:
Alot of information in this leak, similar to the one released yesterday,
although this one really pushes the "iran is making weapons as we speak"
line [johnblasing]
IAEA may show recent bomb-related atom work by Iran
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/08/us-iran-nuclear-iaea-idUSTRE7A738S20111108
VIENNA | Tue Nov 8, 2011 7:56am EST
(Reuters) - A U.N. nuclear watchdog report due this week is expected to
show recent activity in Iran that could help in developing nuclear
bombs, including intelligence about computer modeling of such weapons,
Western diplomats said on Tuesday.
"There are bits and pieces of information that go up through 2010," one
Vienna-based diplomat said.
If confirmed in this week's keenly awaited document by the International
Atomic Energy Agency, it could stimulate new debate about a
controversial U.S. intelligence assessment in 2007 that Iran had halted
outright "weaponization" work in 2003.
It would heighten Western suspicions that Iran is resolved to pursue at
least some of the research and development (R&D) applicable to atom
bombs, even if Tehran has made no apparent decision to actually build
them, as diplomats believe.
"There is still evidence there where I think the agency will be in a
position to say that they have serious concerns coming up to the present
day," said another envoy in the Austrian capital, where the IAEA is
based.
But Western officials and experts suggested that research and
experiments pointing to military nuclear aims may not have continued on
the same scale as before 2003, when Iran started coming under increased
Western pressure over its nuclear work.
"Iran is understood to have continued or restarted some R&D activities
since then," said nuclear proliferation analyst Peter Crail of the
U.S.-based Arms Control Association, a research and advocacy group.
Iran denies accusations it is seeking nuclear arms, saying they are
based on forged documents. It says its uranium enrichment program is
aimed at generating electricity so that it can export more of its
abundant oil.
Many conservative experts criticized the 2007 findings as inaccurate and
naive, and U.S. intelligence agencies now believe Iranian leaders have
resumed closed-door debates over the last four years about whether to
build a nuclear bomb.
"I suspect that the new IAEA report will play into the hands of U.S.
conservative and Israeli critics of the 2007 NIE (National Intelligence
Estimate), who had accused the U.S. intelligence community of playing
down evidence of clandestine nuclear weapons activities in Iran," said
Shannon Kile of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
think tank.
"SERIOUS SCIENTIFIC INTENT"
The IAEA report, due to be submitted to member states in the next few
days, is expected to provide new evidence of explosives and physics
research suggesting Iran is seeking the capability to design nuclear
weapons.
Some of the activities have little application other than atomic
bomb-making, including computer modeling of a nuclear weapon, sources
familiar with the document said.
They said it would support intelligence reports that Iran built a large
steel container at the Parchin military complex southeast of Tehran for
the purpose of carrying out tests with high explosives usable for a
nuclear chain reaction.
"It is a forensic body of evidence that shows some serious scientific
intent," one of the Western diplomats said.
In February, U.S. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said
Iran was "keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons in part by
developing various nuclear capabilities that better position it to
produce such weapons."
Crail said Clapper's statements were not "inconsistent with the notion
that some weapons-related R&D has resumed which is not part of a
determined, integrated weapons-development program of the type that Iran
maintained prior to 2003."
Mark Fitzpatrick, a director of the International Institute for
Strategic Studies, said it was too early to say whether the IAEA report
will cast doubt on the 2007 NIE assessment.
"The U.S. intelligence community already has the information in the IAEA
report," Fitzpatrick said, adding that Clapper as recently as March
confirmed the belief that Iran had not made a decision to restart its
nuclear weapons program.
"The apparent disconnect between that statement and the leaks that have
come out about the IAEA report probably pertain to the time frame of the
weapons research and development and the level and scale of the activity
that the IAEA apparently believes continued after 2003," he said.
(Editing by Mark Heinrich)
On 11/07/2011 09:02 AM, Chris Farnham wrote:
I'm thinking we'll see a bucket load of items out of Iran, the
US and Europe today regarding the coming IAEA report and all
the politicing around it. Might as well have them all in one
place for ease of reading [chris]
Obviously waaaaay too much info here to rep. The key element of this
item is the leaking of the info before the release of the report in
order to prime/set the agenda by focusing on particular aspects and
findings of the report. this leak is obviously a part of the concerted
PR operation on behalf of the Israelis, US and possibly some Europeans
and KSA. The items of the report are secondary in importance to the
agenda that is being played out here to increase pressure on Iran,
probably in the attempt to increase sanctions and push it to the top
of the global consciousness thus giving the US increased leverage to
bargain the best possible pull out of Iraq/Afghanistan [chris]
there was a strange report of an anonymous speaker at a forum last
friday, this may be related to that [johnblasing]
IAEA says foreign expertise has brought Iran to threshold of nuclear
capability
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/iaea-says-foreign-expertise-has-brought-iran-to-threshold-of-nuclear-capability/2011/11/05/gIQAc6hjtM_print.html
By Joby Warrick, Monday, November 7, 4:41 AM
Intelligence provided to U.N. nuclear officials shows that Iran's
government has mastered the critical steps needed to build a nuclear
weapon, receiving assistance from foreign scientists to overcome key
technical hurdles, according to Western diplomats and nuclear experts
briefed on the findings.
Documents and other records provide new details on the role played by
a former Soviet weapons scientist who allegedly tutored Iranians over
several years on building high-precision detonators of the kind used
to trigger a nuclear chain reaction, the officials and experts said.
Crucial technology linked to experts in Pakistan and North Korea also
helped propel Iran to the threshold of nuclear capability, they added.
The officials, citing secret intelligence provided over several years
to the International Atomic Energy Agency, said the records reinforce
concerns that Iran continued to conduct weapons-related research after
2003 - when, U.S. intelligence agencies believe, Iranian leaders
halted such experiments in response to international and domestic
pressures.
The U.N. nuclear watchdog is due to release a report this week laying
out its findings on Iran's efforts to obtain sensitive nuclear
technology. Fears that Iran could quickly build an atomic bomb if it
chooses to has fueled anti-Iran rhetoric and new threats of military
strikes. Some U.S. arms-control groups have cautioned against what
they fear could be an overreaction to the report, saying there is
still time to persuade Iran to change its behavior.
Iranian officials expressed indifference about the report.
"Let them publish and see what happens," said Iran's foreign minister
and former nuclear top official, Ali Akbar Salehi, the semiofficial
Mehr News Agency reported Saturday.
Salehi said that the controversy over Iran's nuclear program is "100
percent political" and that the IAEA is "under pressure from foreign
powers."
`Never really stopped'
Although the IAEA has chided Iran for years to come clean about a
number of apparently weapons-related scientific projects, the new
disclosures fill out the contours of an apparent secret research
program that was more ambitious, more organized and more successful
than commonly suspected. Beginning early in the last decade and
apparently resuming - though at a more measured pace - after a pause
in 2003, Iranian scientists worked concurrently across multiple
disciplines to obtain key skills needed to make and test a nuclear
weapon that could fit inside the country's long-range missiles, said
David Albright, a former IAEA official who has reviewed the
intelligence files.
"The program never really stopped," said Albright, president of the
Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security. The
institute performs widely respected independent analyses of nuclear
programs in countries around the world, often drawing from IAEA data.
"After 2003, money was made available for research in areas that sure
look like nuclear weapons work but were hidden within civilian
institutions," Albright said.
U.S. intelligence officials maintain that Iran's leaders have not
decided whether to build nuclear weapons but are intent on gathering
all the components and skills so they can quickly assemble a bomb if
they choose to. Iran has consistently maintained that its nuclear
activities are peaceful and intended only to generate electricity.
The IAEA has declined to comment on the intelligence it has received
from member states, including the United States, pending the release
of its report.
But some of the highlights were described in a presentation by
Albright at a private conference of intelligence professionals last
week. PowerPoint slides from the presentation were obtained by The
Washington Post, and details of Albright's summary were confirmed by
two European diplomats privy to the IAEA's internal reports. The two
officials spoke on the condition of anonymity, in keeping with
diplomatic protocol.
Albright said IAEA officials, based on the totality of the evidence
given to them, have concluded that Iran "has sufficient information to
design and produce a workable implosion nuclear device" using highly
enriched uranium as its fissile core. In the presentation, he
described intelligence that points to a formalized and rigorous
process for gaining all the necessary skills for weapons-building,
using native talent as well as a generous helping of foreign
expertise.
"The [intelligence] points to a comprehensive project structure and
hierarchy with clear responsibilities, timelines and deliverables,"
Albright said, according to the notes from the presentation.
Key outside assistance
According to Albright, one key breakthrough that has not been publicly
described was Iran's success in obtaining design information for a
device known as an R265 generator. The device is a hemispherical
aluminum shell with an intricate array of high explosives that
detonate with split-second precision. These charges compress a small
sphere of enriched uranium or plutonium to trigger a nuclear chain
reaction.
Creating such a device is a formidable technical challenge, and Iran
needed outside assistance in designing the generator and testing its
performance, Albright said.
According to the intelligence provided to the IAEA, key assistance in
both areas was provided by Vyacheslav Danilenko, a former Soviet
nuclear scientist who was contracted in the mid-1990s by Iran's
Physics Research Center, a facility linked to the country's nuclear
program. Documents provided to the U.N. officials showed that
Danilenko offered assistance to the Iranians over at least five years,
giving lectures and sharing research papers on developing and testing
an explosives package that the Iranians apparently incorporated into
their warhead design, according to two officials with access to the
IAEA's confidential files.
Danilenko's role was judged to be so critical that IAEA investigators
devoted considerable effort to obtaining his cooperation, the two
officials said. The scientist acknowledged his role but said he
thought his work was limited to assisting civilian engineering
projects, the sources said.
There is no evidence that Russian government officials knew of
Danilenko's activities in Iran. E-mails requesting comment from
Russian officials in Washington and Moscow were not returned. Efforts
to reach Danilenko through his former company were not successful.
Iran relied on foreign experts to supply mathematical formulas and
codes for theoretical design work - some of which appear to have
originated in North Korea, diplomats and weapons experts say.
Additional help appears to have come from the father of Pakistan's
nuclear program, Abdul Qadeer Khan, whose design for a device known as
a neutron initiator was found in Iran, the sources said. Khan is known
to have provided nuclear blueprints to Libya that included a neutron
initiator, a device that shoots a stream of atomic particles into a
nuclear weapon's fissile core at the start of the nuclear chain
reaction.
One Iranian document provided to the IAEA portrayed Iranian scientists
as discussing plans to conduct a four-year study of neutron initiators
beginning in 2007, four years after Iran was said to have halted such
research.
"It is unknown if it commenced or progressed as planned," Albright
said.
The disclosures come against a backdrop of new threats of military
strikes on Iran. Israeli newspapers reported last week that there is
high-level government support in Israel for a military attack on
Iran's nuclear installations.
"One of the problems with such open threats of military action is that
it furthers the drift towards a military conflict and makes it more
difficult to dial down tensions," said Peter Crail, a nonproliferation
analyst with the Arms Control Association, a Washington advocacy
group. "It also risks creating an assumption that we can always end
Iran's nuclear program with a few airstrikes if nothing else works.
That's simply not the case."
Special correspondent Thomas Erdbrink in Tehran contributed to this
report.
(Corr) Cleric asks IAEA head to avoid "lies"against Iran, save
dignity of Agency
At 0522 gmt, IRTV1 started airing the Id al-Adha prayer sermons in
Tehran by Ayatollah Seyyed Ahmad Khatami live. Ayatollah Khatami
listed 10 types of plots that America and Israel have resorted to
against Iran during the past 32 year.
He said: "During the past 32 years, we have witnessed different
types of plots of the global arrogance against us, especially of the
US and its illegitimate child, the Zionist regime. I have written
down 10 types of these [plots] - seven of which refer to the
domestic field and three others the foreign field."
He described "ethnic wars" as the first type of plots. Then he spoke
about "assassinations" and said: "Over 12,000 people have been
assassinated by the US and its agents in this country" He added that
Iran possesses 100 "undeniable documents" that prove America's
involvement in the assassinations inside the country and outside of
it, in other countries.
He referred to the "eight-year imposed war" (Iraq-Iran war) as the
third type of plot and termed "influences up to the level of the
president" as the fourth type of plots (reference to the 2009
presidential candidate Mirhoseyn Musavi).
Describing "coups" as the fifth type of plot, he said that six coups
were initiated by the US in Iran, all of which, he said were
"foiled" with the help of God.
He called the "soft warfare and"1388 sedition" (2009 post-poll
protests) are the sixth and seventh types of America's and Israel's
plots against Iran.
Regarding the foreign types of plots, Khatami said: "Eight:
Intrusion into Afghanistan aimed at creating a base against the
Islamic Iran. Nine: Intrusion into Iraq to establish control over
Iran. 10: New Middle East, which was aimed at curbing the wave of
the huge Islamic Revolution."
He added that all these plots were "foiled" with the help of God.
Source: Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran Network 1, Tehran, in
Persian 0525gmt 07 Nov 11
BBC Mon Alert ME1 MEPol sh
(c) Copyright British Broadcasting Corporation 2011
Top cleric lists 10 types of US, Israel "plots" against Iran
At 0522 gmt, IRTV1 started airing the Id al-Adha prayer sermons in
Tehran by Ayatollah Seyyed Ahmad Khatami live. Ayatollah Khatami
listed 10 types of plots that America and Israel have resorted to
against Iran during the past 32 year.
He said: "During the past 32 years, we have witnessed different
types of plots of the global arrogance against us, especially of the
US and its illegitimate child, the Zionist regime. I have written
down 10 types of these [plots] - seven of which refer to the
domestic field and three others the foreign field."
He described "ethnic wars" as the first type of plots. Then he spoke
about "assassinations" and said: "Over 12,000 people have been
assassinated by the US and its agents in this country" He added that
Iran possesses 100 "undeniable documents" that prove America's
involvement in the assassinations inside the country and outside of
it, in other countries.
He referred to the "eight-year imposed war" (Iraq-Iran war) as the
third type of plot and termed "influences up to the level of the
president" as the fourth type of plots (reference to the 2009
presidential candidate Mirhoseyn Musavi).
Describing "coups" as the fifth type of plot, he said that six coups
were initiated by the US in Iran, all of which, he said were
"foiled" with the help of God.
He called the "soft warfare and"1388 sedition" (2009 post-poll
protests) are the sixth and seventh types of America's and Israel's
plots against Iran.
Regarding the foreign types of plots, Khatami said: "Eight:
Intrusion into Afghanistan aimed at creating a base against the
Islamic Iran. Nine: Intrusion into Iraq to establish control over
Iran. 10: New Middle East, which was aimed at curbing the wave of
the huge Islamic Revolution."
He added that all these plots were "foiled" with the help of God.
Source: Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran Network 1, Tehran, in
Persian 0522gmt 07 Nov 11
BBC Mon Alert ME1 MEPol sh
(c) Copyright British Broadcasting Corporation 2011
More anti-Western remarks attributed to Khatami [chris]
Top clear asks IAEA chief to avoid "lies" against Iran, save
dignity of Agency
During the Id al-Adha sermons at Tehran University being aired
live by IRTV1, Ayatollah Seyyed Ahmad Khatami referred to the
upcoming IAEA report on Iran nuclear programme and addressed the
Secretary-General of the Agency [Yukiya Amano], saying: "Do not
insult the dignity of the International Atomic Energy Agency with
your conduct."
He added that if he [Amano] is used as a "week tool of the US" and
acts against the "independent nation" of Iran and "publishes lies"
in the form of a document then "whatever dignity is left of the
Agency, will be wiped off."
Thanking God for his blessings, he further said that all "plots"
against Iran have always been "nullified".
He added: "I explicitly tell America that the period of superpower
has ended [for you]. America is being considered like an empty
drum in the world, today. Neither are you the America of the past,
nor the Islamic Iran is Iran of the past of during the Shah's
time."
He added that Iran today is a strong country that can confront any
plot in a manner that will be a "lesson" for others.
Source: Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran Network 1, Tehran,
in Persian 0525gmt 07 Nov 11
BBC Mon Alert ME1 MEPol sh
(c) Copyright British Broadcasting Corporation 2011
Iran foreign minister terms Bushehr plant "symbol" of Iran-Russia ties
Text of report by Iranian official government news agency IRNA website
Tehran, 6 November, IRNA: Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said here on
Sunday [6 November] that Bushehr nuclear power plant is a symbol of
Iran-Russia cooperation.
He made the remark in a meeting with new Russian Ambassador to Iran Leon
Jagarian, who submitted a copy of his credentials to Salehi.
"Bushehr power plant as a symbol of Iran-Russia cooperation proves that
the two countries can exchange views and cooperate at regional and
international levels.
Pointing to the Iran-Russia excellent relations, Salehi said
unfortunately the volume of trade exchange between the two countries is
not enough while they have high potentials in this regard.
Expressing Iran's readiness to increase the current volume of economic
exchange by 10bn dollars, he said the two countries can expand their
cooperation in such fields as politics, economy, trade, culture, oil and
gas and power plant construction.
Jagarian described the recent meeting between the Iranian and Russian
presidents in Astana, Kazakhstan as a new phase in the two countries'
relations.
He also expressed his country's readiness to cooperate with Iran at
regional and international levels.
Source: Islamic Republic News Agency website, Tehran, in English 1613gmt
06 Nov 11
BBC Mon ME1 MEPol sh
(c) Copyright British Broadcasting Corporation 2011
Not on IRNA english yet - CR
Attacking Iran would make US, Israel "pay heavy price" - official
Excerpt from report by Iranian news channel Press TV website
A member of Iran's Assembly of Expert says that the United States and
Israel will have to pay a heavy price for any military attack on Iran's
nuclear facilities.
Seyyed Mahmud Alavi told IRNA on Sunday [6 November] that Washington and
Tel Aviv are aware of the fact that putting their anti-Iran threats into
practice would cost them dearly, and thus they would not become involved
in such folly.
He stated that the US and Israel know that such empty threats cannot
intimidate Iran and also know that they would receive a crushing
response if they ever attack the Islamic Republic.
[Passage omitted: background information]
Source: Press TV website, Tehran, in English 1419gmt 06 Nov 11
BBC Mon ME1 MEPol sh
(c) Copyright British Broadcasting Corporation 2011
Transcript Ehud Barak interview
Page last updated at 11:09 GMT, Sunday, 6 November 2011
PLEASE NOTE "THE ANDREW MARR SHOW" MUST BE CREDITED IF ANY
PART OF THIS TRANSCRIPT IS USED
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/andrew_marr_show/9632770.stm
JEREMY VINE:
Now by any standards Ehud Barak has had an astonishing career
serving his country. Israel's Prime Minister during the Camp
David negotiations with Yasser Arafat now serves as both
Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister in the current
government. Before entering politics, he was one of the
country's most decorated soldiers carrying out the kind of
military ops that are now the stuff of legend among many
Israelis. So a man of peace or a man of war? When I met him in
London recently, I began by asking why his government has
authorised the building of more settlements despite
international criticism.
EHUD BARAK:
We are building in Jerusalem. It's our capital. We are
building in the Jewish neighbourhoods of Jerusalem. It's a
city of 700,000 people. You have to build and we will not
accept anyone has the right to intervene in this. And we ...
JEREMY VINE:
(over) Well that is seen as speeding up, isn't it? That's seen
as acceleration.
EHUD BARAK:
(over) No, it's not. No speeding up ... It's about numbers and
pace, numbers per unit time. When Olmert was Prime Minister
five years ago, we were building our defence minister twice
the rate we are building now. When I was Prime Minister ten
years ago, we were building four times the rate we are
building right now. So it's not about the pace.
JEREMY VINE:
But why not ... Again it's about the symbolism. Why not just
stop for a while because the other side see this as getting in
the way, don't they?
EHUD BARAK:
No, no, the other side plays with it as a kind of manipulation
to put certain preconditions into the dialogue. The reason
that Olmert's government and my government could do it is
because somehow we managed to convince the rest of the world
that we are genuine in our talks and now we are facing more
sophisticated Palestinian group which feels the zeitgeist
behind them. They feel that they have good will from many
international bodies, so they try to play with this issue of
settlement. It really shouldn't matter because ...
JEREMY VINE:
Well you said something very, very interesting there - the
phrases you've used - where you say you're dealing with a
sophisticated Palestinian leadership now and they're very
zeitgeisty and I couldn't have put it better myself in these
questions. They're getting world opinion behind them, aren't
they?
EHUD BARAK:
Yuh, yuh. We have to work properly to allow our people, our
kind of spokesmen to talk more often to others, but it won't
solve the issue. It cannot ...
JEREMY VINE:
(over) Are you frustrated at that?
EHUD BARAK:
I am a little bit frustrated by the fact that we cannot
convince even some of our friends.
JEREMY VINE:
Okay, just to be clear. You accept that it strengthens Hamas
if you go on building these settlements or not?
EHUD BARAK:
I don't think it relates to Hamas. Hamas basically is
challenging Abu Mazen and the Palestinian authority. They are
turning to terror. We cannot negotiate with them. Hamas are
shooting at us rockets. You know just last week we got dozens
of rockets in our southern part of the country. One man,
father of four, was killed. That's something that cannot go
together with peacemaking.
JEREMY VINE:
Let me change the subject.
EHUD BARAK:
(over) So it will be a challenge for Abu Mazen to take control
over his own political system.
JEREMY VINE:
Alright, alright, I want to just move on because we haven't
got much time. I want to talk to you about Iran as well. And I
gather if we had the Israeli newspapers here and we opened
them up, we would see that everyone in Israel is now thinking
that you're getting ready to attack Iran. Is that right? Is
that what people are saying?
EHUD BARAK:
Believe me, don't ... I do not try to underestimate the nature
of the Iranian threat. That's a major threat for the stability
of the whole region, probably of the whole world. A nuclear
Iran - and they are determined to reach nuclear military
capability - can open a major arms race, nuclear arms race in
the whole Middle East. It can change the effectiveness of
their supporting and their co-sponsoring of terror all around
the region. They can ...
JEREMY VINE:
(over) Which is why the Israeli papers are saying aha, you're
about to strike on them.
EHUD BARAK:
No, but I am telling it for years now. And they will
intimidate neighbours in a much more effective way, especially
when America and others are moving out of the region. I hope
that the IAEA Report next week will tell the whole world a
little bit more explicitly what they are really doing in
regard to their nuclear plan.
JEREMY VINE:
(over) This is the narrative that's coming together. It's the
missile test. It's the long range bombing plan. It's the IAEA
Report which you mentioned. So they may say that Iran is
getting closer to a bomb.
EHUD BARAK:
We strongly believe that sanctions are effective or could be
effective if they are little and paralysing enough, that
diplomacy could work if enough unity could be synchronised
between the major players, but that no option should be
removed from the table.
JEREMY VINE:
You have an amazing military record, and for those who don't
know it, 19... - correct me if I'm wrong here - 1972 led the
mission to free hostages on a Sabena flight; 1973, I read
somewhere you dressed as a woman to assassinate - you're
nodding - members of the PLO.
EHUD BARAK:
(over) Not as a hobby, yuh.
JEREMY VINE:
Okay. A scene in the film Munich reflected that. You were
involved in Operation Entebbe in 1976; helped dismantle the
Palestinian terror cell known as Black September. I'm thinking
you're not really into diplomacy here. You would like to
attack Iran.
EHUD BARAK:
No, I was also Foreign Affairs Minister of Israel and Prime
Minister. In the last 15 years I didn't shot a single shot at
anyone and I played a lot round the diplomatic saloons and the
TV interviews as well. You know it's too serious. Israel is
there. A person cannot choose his parents and a nation cannot
choose its neighbours. We are living in a tough neighbourhood.
No mercy for the weak, no second opportunity for those who
cannot defend themselves. We would love to have the Canadians
as our neighbours, but unfortunately the Americans got them.
It's a tough neighbourhood and we have to be strong.
JEREMY VINE:
(over) One more because if you suddenly attack Iran next week,
I want to make sure we've asked every question here. Have you
got British support for that - for flying over them and
dropping a bomb on their nuclear reactors?
EHUD BARAK:
I'm not going even to respond to this. May I say we are not
... don't worry about your next week programme, but the
Iranian challenge is serious. This is something that should be
prevented from happening. We have to stay there. We are
strong. Israel is the strongest country a thousand miles
around Jerusalem. We plan to remain the strongest country
around. But we are at the same time peaceful. We are ready to
make peace at any moment with any one of our neighbours.
JEREMY VINE:
So pretty cautious. Ehud Barak there, Israel's Defence
Minister. No options ruled out on Iran.
INTERVIEW ENDS
--
Clint Richards
Global Monitor
clint.richards@stratfor.com
cell: 81 080 4477 5316
office: 512 744 4300 ex:40841
Iran Calligrapher's Association of North America, according to
Google. Possibly not the entity being referred to below,
though [chris]
No idea what ICANA is... - CR
Nuclear talks possible only if IAEA submits "honest" report - Iran
official
Text of report by Iranian news channel Press TV website
An Iranian lawmaker says Iran has nothing to hide regarding its nuclear
programme and Tehran will only participate in negotiations if the UN
atomic agency is "honest" in its reports.
Deputy Chairman of Iran's Majlis (parliament) National Security and
Foreign Policy Committee Esma'il Kowsari said that if the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) resorts to deception then Iran "will set
conditions for talks."
He went on to say that so long as the IAEA submits to the will of
arrogant powers particularly Washington, the agency's reports will
always be compiled to portray Iran in a negative light.
"While the US has between 7,000 to 10,000 nuclear warheads and no other
country has atrocities such as Nagasaki and Hiroshima on its record, the
agency makes no effort to act against it (the US) and does not even dare
write a report against it," ICANA quoted him as saying on Sunday.
The IAEA director-general Yukiya Amano is scheduled to submit his new
report on Iran's nuclear case to IAEA member states on 8 November 2011.
However, Amano's visit to Washington for talks with US officials ahead
of the publication of the report has cast grave suspicion over its
objectivity and sincerity.
Iran has always rejected US allegations that it is pursuing a military
nuclear program and asserted the right to develop and acquire nuclear
technology for peaceful purposes as a signatory to the Non-Proliferation
Treaty [NPT].
Source: Press TV website, Tehran, in English 1925gmt 06 Nov 11
BBC Mon ME1 MEPol sh
(c) Copyright British Broadcasting Corporation 2011
On 11/6/11 9:43 PM, Chris Farnham wrote:
al-Ahkbar isn't in english - CR
Iran's Ahmadinejad defiant as U.S. raises heat-paper
http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/irans-ahmadinejad-defiant-as-us-raises-heat-paper/
06 Nov 2011 23:19
CAIRO, Nov 7 (Reuters) - The United States fears Iran's
growing military power because it is now able to compete
with Israel and the West, Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad said in comments carried by an Egyptian
newspaper on Monday.
Responding to a toughening stance from the United States
and Israel against Tehran, Ahmadinejad accused Washington
of inventing conspiracies to discredit Iran and sowing
discord with its near neighbour Saudi Arabia.
"Yes, we have military capabilities that are different
from any other country in the region," Egyptian daily
al-Akhbar cited Ahmadinejad as saying. "Iran is increasing
in capability and advancement and therefore we are able to
compete with Israel and the West and especially the United
States."
"The U.S. fears Iran's capability," he told the paper.
"Iran will not permit (anyone from making) a move against
it."
Iran's Islamic rulers, who say Israel has no right to
exist, deny accusations that they are seeking nuclear
weapons and have warned they will respond to any attacks
by striking at Israel and U.S. interests in the Gulf.
A senior U.S. military official said on Friday Iran had
become the biggest threat to the United States and
Israel's president said the military option to stop the
Islamic republic from obtaining nuclear weapons was
nearer.
Ahmadinejad repeated that Iran does not own a nuclear
bomb, but said Israel's end was inevitable.
The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, is expected this week
to issue its most detailed report yet on research in Iran
seen as geared to developing atomic bombs.
"It is Israel that has about 300 nuclear warheads. Iran is
only keen to have nuclear capability for peaceful means,"
he said, accusing Washington of lumping Iran with Syria,
the Islamist Hamas movement that rules Gaza and Hezbollah
in Lebanon.
The U.S. portrays those four as "the Axis of Evil to save
the Zionist entity (Israel). But the Zionists are bound to
go out of existence," he said.
Responding to a U.S. claim that Iran was involved in a
plot to kill the Saudi ambassador to Washington,
Ahmadinejad said: "Iran is farthest from thinking of
carrying out such crimes but the U.S. is always inventing
conspiracies against Iran".
"The U.S. fears any friendship between us and Saudi Arabia
and therefore incites disagreements," he said. "To stop
the U.S. in its tracks we must deepen the elements of
friendship... We are ready for this and the relation
between Saudi and Iran already exists and has not been cut
off." (Reporting by Marwa Awad; Writing by Tom Pfeiffer;
Editing by Matthew Jones)
--
Clint Richards
Global Monitor
clint.richards@stratfor.com
cell: 81 080 4477 5316
office: 512 744 4300 ex:40841
--
Clint Richards
Global Monitor
clint.richards@stratfor.com
cell: 81 080 4477 5316
office: 512 744 4300 ex:40841
--
Chris Farnham
Senior Watch Officer, STRATFOR
Australia Mobile: 0423372241
Email: chris.farnham@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Chris Farnham
Senior Watch Officer, STRATFOR
Australia Mobile: 0423372241
Email: chris.farnham@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Chris Farnham
Senior Watch Officer, STRATFOR
Australia Mobile: 0423372241
Email: chris.farnham@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Chris Farnham
Senior Watch Officer, STRATFOR
Australia Mobile: 0423372241
Email: chris.farnham@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Chris Farnham
Senior Watch Officer, STRATFOR
Australia Mobile: 0423372241
Email: chris.farnham@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Chris Farnham
Senior Watch Officer, STRATFOR
Australia Mobile: 0423372241
Email: chris.farnham@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com
--
Benjamin Preisler
Watch Officer
STRATFOR
+216 22 73 23 19
www.STRATFOR.com
--
Marc Lanthemann
Watch Officer
STRATFOR
+1 609-865-5782
www.stratfor.com