Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 19723 / 251,287

### Articles

Brazil Sri Lanka United Kingdom Sweden 00. Editorial United States Latin America Egypt Jordan Yemen Thailand

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05 2011/06 2011/07 2011/08
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
2011/05/01 2011/05/02 2011/05/03 2011/05/04 2011/05/05 2011/05/06 2011/05/07 2011/05/08 2011/05/09 2011/05/10 2011/05/11 2011/05/12 2011/05/13 2011/05/14 2011/05/15 2011/05/16 2011/05/17 2011/05/18 2011/05/19 2011/05/20 2011/05/21 2011/05/22 2011/05/23 2011/05/24 2011/05/25 2011/05/26 2011/05/27 2011/05/28 2011/05/29 2011/05/30 2011/05/31
2011/06/01 2011/06/02 2011/06/03 2011/06/04 2011/06/05 2011/06/06 2011/06/07 2011/06/08 2011/06/09 2011/06/10 2011/06/11 2011/06/12 2011/06/13 2011/06/14 2011/06/15 2011/06/16 2011/06/17 2011/06/18 2011/06/19 2011/06/20 2011/06/21 2011/06/22 2011/06/23 2011/06/24 2011/06/25 2011/06/26 2011/06/27 2011/06/28 2011/06/29 2011/06/30
2011/07/01 2011/07/02 2011/07/04 2011/07/05 2011/07/06 2011/07/07 2011/07/08 2011/07/10 2011/07/11 2011/07/12 2011/07/13 2011/07/14 2011/07/15 2011/07/16 2011/07/17 2011/07/18 2011/07/19 2011/07/20 2011/07/21 2011/07/22 2011/07/23 2011/07/25 2011/07/27 2011/07/28 2011/07/29 2011/07/31
2011/08/01 2011/08/02 2011/08/03 2011/08/05 2011/08/06 2011/08/07 2011/08/08 2011/08/09 2011/08/10 2011/08/11 2011/08/12

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03 1985/05 1985/06
1986/05 1986/08 1986/12
1987/06
1988/01 1988/03 1988/04 1988/07 1988/08 1988/12
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
1991/05 1991/07 1991/11
1992/01 1992/03 1992/06 1992/09 1992/11 1992/12
1993/01 1993/02 1993/10
1994/11 1994/12
1995/01 1995/04 1995/06 1995/11
1996/07 1996/09 1996/11
1997/02 1997/03 1997/05 1997/06 1997/08 1997/10 1997/12
1998/05 1998/12
1999/01 1999/09
2000/05 2000/06 2000/09 2000/11 2000/12
2001/02 2001/03 2001/04 2001/05 2001/06 2001/07 2001/09 2001/10 2001/11 2001/12
2002/01 2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/06 2002/07 2002/08 2002/09 2002/11 2002/12
2003/01 2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Belfast Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chiang Mai Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Freetown Consulate Fukuoka
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guayaquil Consulate Guangzhou Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Hong Kong Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy Libreville Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Mission Geneva Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maseru Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne Consulate Matamoros
Embassy Nicosia Embassy Niamey Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Nuevo Laredo Consulate Naples Consulate Naha Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito Consulate Quebec
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sapporo Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE UN Rome Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vientiane Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ASEC AEMR AMGT AR APECO AU AORC AJ AF AFIN AS AM ABLD AFFAIRS AMB APER AA AE ATRN ADM ACOA AID AY AG ALOW AND ABUD AMED ASPA AL APEC ADPM ADANA AFSI ARABL ADCO ANARCHISTS AZ ANET AMEDCASCKFLO AADP AO AGRICULTURE ASEAN ACABQ ARF APRC AFSN AFSA AORG AINF AINR AODE APCS AROC ARCH AGAO ADB AX AMEX ASUP ARM AQ ATFN AMBASSADOR ARAS ACBAQ AC AOPR AREP ASIG ASEX AER AVERY ASCH AFU AMG ATPDEA ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AORL AN AIT AGMT ACS AGR AMCHAMS AECL AUC AFGHANISTAN ACAO
BR BB BG BEXP BY BA BRUSSELS BU BD BK BL BE BO BTIO BH BM BAIO BRPA BUSH BILAT BF BX BMGT BOL BC BIDEN BP BBG BBSR BT BWC BEXPC BN BTIU
CPAS CA CASC CS CBW CIDA CO CODEL CI CROS CU CH CWC CMGT CVIS CDG CG CF CHIEF CJAN CBSA CE CY CB CW CM CHR CD CT CDC CONS CAMBODIA CN CR COUNTRY CONDOLEEZZA CZ CARICOM COM CICTE CYPRUS CBE CACS COE CIVS CFED COUNTER COPUOS CARSON CAPC CV CTR CITES CKGR CVR CLINTON COUNTERTERRORISM CITEL CLEARANCE CSW CIC CITT CARIB CAFTA CACM CDB CJUS CTM CAN CAJC CONSULAR CLMT CBC CIA CNARC CIS CEUDA CHINA CAC CL
DR DJ DB DHS DAO DCM DO DEFENSE DA DK DOMESTIC DE DISENGAGEMENT DOD DOT DPRK DEPT DEA DOE DTRA DS DEAX
ECON ETTC EFIS ETRD EC EMIN EAGR EAID EU EFIN EUN ECIN EG EWWT EINV ENRG ELAB EPET EN EAIR EUMEM ECPS ELTN EIND EZ EI ER ET EINT ECONOMIC ENIV EFTA ES EET ECONOMY ENV EAG ELECTIONS ESTH ETRO ECIP EPEC EXIM ENERG ECCT EREL EK EDEV ERNG ENGY EPA ETRAD ELTNSNAR ENGR ETRC ELAP EUREM EEB EETC ECOSOC ENVI EXTERNAL ELN ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EAIDS EDU EPREL EINVEFIN ECA EFINECONCS EIDN EINVKSCA ETC ENVR EAP EINN EXBS ECONOMICS EIAR EINDETRD ECONEFIN EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EFIM EINVETC ECONCS EDRC ENRD EBRD ETRA ESA EAIG EUR EUC ERD ETRN EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ESENV ENNP ECINECONCS ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN
FR FI FOREIGN FAO FREEDOM FARC FAS FINANCE FBI FTAA FCS FAA FJ FTA FK FT FAC FDA FINR FM FOR FOI FO FMLN FISO
GM GERARD GT GA GG GR GTIP GE GH GY GB GLOBAL GEORGE GCC GC GV GAZA GL GOV GOI GF GTMO GANGS GAERC GZ GUILLERMO GASPAR
HR HA HYMPSK HO HK HUMAN HN HUD HU HURI HILLARY HI HUM HSTC HEBRON HUMOR
IZ IN IAEA IS IMO ILO IR IC IT ITU IV IMF IBRD IWC IPR IRAQI IDB ISRAELI ITALY ITPGOV ITALIAN IADB ID ICAO ICRC INR IO IFAD ICJ IRAQ INL INMARSAT INRA INTERNAL INTELSAT ILC INDO IRS IIP ITRA IQ IEFIN ICTY ISCON IAHRC IA INTERPOL IEA INRB ISRAEL IZPREL IRAJ IF ITPHUM IL IACI IDA ISLAMISTS IGAD ITF INRO IBET IDP ICTR IRC
JA JO JM JP JOHN JUS JAMES JOSEPH JOHNNIE JML JIMENEZ
KOMC KNNP KFLO KDEM KSUM KIPR KFLU KPAO KE KCRM KJUS KAWC KZ KSCA KDRG KCOR KGHG KPAL KTIP KMCA KCRS KPKO KOLY KRVC KVPR KG KWBG KMDR KTER KSPR KV KTFN KWMN KFRD KSTH KS KN KISL KGIC KSEP KFIN KTEX KTIA KUNR KCMR KMOC KCIP KTDB KBIO KSAF KU KHIV KNNNP KSTC KNUP KIRF KIRC KHLS KIDE KTDD KMPI KSEO KSCS KICC KCFE KNUC KGLB KIVP KPWR KR KCOM KESS KCSY KWN KREL KRFD KBCT KREC KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KOCI KGIT KMCC KPRP KPRV KAUST KPAOPREL KCRIM KIRP KLAB KHSA KPAONZ KCRCM KICA KHDP KNAR KINR KGHA KPAOY KTRD KTAO KWAC KJUST KACT KSCI KNPP KMRS KHUM KTBT KNNPMNUC KBTS KERG KPIR KTLA KNDP KAID KAWK KO KFSC KENV KX KVRP KPOA KMFO KVIR KRCM KCFC KNEI KCHG KPLS KFTFN KTFM KLIG KDEMAF KRAD KBTR KGCC KSEC KPIN KDEV KWWMN KOM KWNM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KRGY KIFR KSAC KWMNCS KPAK KOMS KFPC KRIM KDDG KCGC KPAI KID KMIG KNSD KWMM
LY LE LABOR LH LAB LI LTTE LO LU LA LVPR LT LG LOG
MARR MX MASS MOPS MNUC MCAP MTCRE MRCRE MTRE MASC MY MK MCC MO MAS MZ MCA MIL MU ML MTCR MEPP MG MI MINUSTAH MP MA MD MAR MAPP MR MOPPS MTS MLS MILI MEPN MEPI MEETINGS MERCOSUR MW MT MIK MN MAPS MV MILITARY MARAD MDC MACEDONIA MASSMNUC MUCN MEDIA MQADHAFI MPOS MPS MC
NZ NATO NI NO NU NG NL NPT NS NSF NA NP NATIONAL NASA NDP NIH NC NIPP NSSP NEGROPONTE NK NE NAS NATOIRAQ NGO NR NAR NZUS NARC NH NSG NAFTA NEW NRR NT NOVO NATOPREL NEA NSC NV NPA NSFO NW NORAD NPG NOAA
OTRA OECD OVIP OREP OPRC ODC OIIP OPDC OAS OSCE OPIC OMS OEXC OPCW OIE OSCI OPAD ODIP OM OFDP OFFICIALS OEXP OPEC ODPC OVIPPRELUNGANU OSHA OSIC OHUM OTR OMIG OSAC OBSP OFDA OVP ON OCII OES OCS OIC
PGOV PREL PARM PINR PHUM PM PREF PTER PK PINS PBIO PHSA PE PBTS PL POL PAK POV POLITICS POLICY PA PNAT PALESTINIAN PCI PAS PO PROV PH PROP PERM PETR PRELBR POLITICAL PJUS PREZ PAO PRELPK PAIGH PROG PMAR PU PG PDOV PTE PGOVSOCI PMIL PY PGOR PBTSRU PRAM PARMS PGOF PTERE PERL PREO PINO PSI PPA PRGOV PORG PP PS PKFK PSOE PEPR PDEM PINT PRELP PREFA PNG PTBS PFOR PUNE PGOVLO PHUMBA POLINT PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PLN PHUH PEDRO PF PHUS PETER PARTIES PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PHUMPREL POGOV PEL PINL PBT PINF PRL PSEPC POSTS PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOC PNR
QA
RS RP RU RW RFE RCMP RIGHTSPOLMIL RO ROBERT RM ROOD RICE REGION RELAM RSP RF RELATIONS RIGHTS RUPREL REMON RPEL REACTION REPORT RSO
SZ SENV SOCI SNAR SY SO SP SU SI SMIG SYR SA SCUL SW SR SYRIA SNARM SPECIALIST SG SENS SF SEN SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR SN SC SNA SK SL SANC SMIL SCRM SENVSXE SAARC STEINBERG SCRS SARS SWE SENVQGR SNARIZ SAN ST SIPDIS SSA SPCVIS SOFA SENVKGHG SHI SEVN SHUM SH SNARCS SPCE SNARN SIPRS
TRGY TBIO TSPA TU TPHY TI TX TH TIP TSPL TNGD TS TW TRSY TZ TN TINT TC TR TIO TF TK TRAD TT TWI TD TERRORISM TP TL TV TO TURKEY TSPAM TREL TRT TFIN TAGS THPY TBID
UK UNSC UNGA UN US UZ USEU UG UP UNAUS UNMIK USTR UY UNSCR UNRCR UNESCO UNICEF USPS UNHCR UNHRC UNFICYP UNCSD UNEP USAID UV UNDP UNTAC USDA USUN UNMIC UNCHR UNCTAD UR USGS USNC UA USOAS UE UNVIE UAE UNO UNODC UNCHS UNDESCO UNC UNPUOS UNDC UNCHC UNFCYP UNIDROIT UNCND
VE VM VT VZ VEPREL VN VTEG VTIZ VTPREL VISIT VENZ VAT VC VI
WHTI WIPO WTRO WTO WHO WFP WS WA WZ WI WMD WBG WWARD WHA WITH WTRQ WEU WMO WB
XA XW XX XK XL XM XS XF XR XY XG XT XC XH XD XE XV XB XU XZ XQ XI XTAG
YI YM YE YL YMCS
ZU ZI ZOELLICK ZP ZR ZO ZK ZF ZL ZB ZN ZH ZT ZJ ZEALAND ZA ZANU

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 05BRASILIA2589, BRAZIL'S FINANCE MINISTRY MAKES PITCH FOR

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05BRASILIA2589.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
05BRASILIA2589 | 2005-09-28 19:54 | 2011-07-11 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Brasilia

`

    This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

` `

    UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BRASILIA 002589

    SIPDIS

    DEPT FOR WHA/BSC, WHA/EPSC AND EB/TPP
    DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USTR SBOVIM AND LYANG
    TREASURY FOR FPARODI
    USDOC FOR 3134/USFCS/OIO/WH/EOLSON
    USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/WH/OLAC/MWARD
    NSC FOR SCRONIN

    SENSITIVE

    E.O. 12958: N/A
    TAGS: ETRD ECON WTO
    SUBJECT: BRAZIL'S FINANCE MINISTRY MAKES PITCH FOR
    AGGRESSIVE TARIFF REDUCTIONS IN NAMA NEGOTIATIONS

    ¶1. (U) Summary. An aggressive tariff cutting proposal for
    WTO Doha Development Agenda (DDA) non-agricultural market
    access negotiations (NAMA), put forward internally by
    Brazil's Finance Ministry, has generated a storm of protest
    by the country's private sector and largest labor union, and
    angst for Brazilian negotiators who are concerned that
    public discussion of the proposal has exposed Brazil's
    bottom line.  In government deliberations, the Finance
    Ministry has proposed the GoB advocate a simple Swiss
    formula approach to tariff reduction for industrial products
    utilizing 15 as the formula coefficient; the Finance
    Ministry proposal is in line with USG calls for adoption of
    a Swiss formula in the NAMA negotiations with two different
    coefficients, one for developed countries, the other for
    developing countries.  However, Finance's proposal is at
    odds with the approach Brazil previously formulated with
    Argentina and India and which continues to define the GoB's
    official position.  On September 19, Brazil's inter-
    ministerial trade chamber, CAMEX, decided to continue
    deliberation on four tariff reduction proposals, including
    Finance's, in order to analyze new studies, expand
    consultations with the private sector and interested social
    groups, and assess prospects for significant advances in the
    WTO agricultural negotiations.  Even if not adopted by the
    GoB as is, Finance's proposal may give some glimpse into
    Brazil's potential market opening for industrial products.
    End Summary.

    ¶2. (U) On September 6, the coordinating committee for
    Brazil's inter-ministerial Trade Chamber (CAMEX) received
    four proposals on the level of market opening Brazil would
    be willing to provide for non-agricultural products in the
    NAMA negotiations should adequate advances be made in the
    agriculture talks.   An aggressive tariff cutting proposal
    put forward by the Finance Ministry sparked substantial
    criticism from other ministries and the private sector.
    Finance's proposal differed significantly from the three
    proposals put forward by the Ministry of Development,
    Industry and Trade (MDIC), the Foreign Ministry, and the
    Coalizao Empresarial (Business Coalition) not only in the
    level of market opening recommended, but also in that it was
    based on a simple Swiss formula; the other proposals were
    premised on the April 2005 Argentina-Brazil-India (ABI) NAMA
    tariff cutting proposal, which links a country's item-
    specific tariff cuts, and establishment of bindings, to its
    existing overall level of tariff protection.

    ¶3. (SBU) According to Maria Elisa Maia (please protect), of
    the Foreign Ministry's Market Access Division, the Finance
    Ministry had not been active in internal discussions on the
    NAMA negotiations until April of this year, at which point,
    as it searched for new policy tools, it seized on the idea
    of reducing Brazil's import tariffs as a means of inducing
    economic growth.  Maia told Econoff that sharp differences
    then emerged between Finance and MDIC, industry's principal
    advocate.  Finally in an attempt to overcome the internal
    impasse, the Foreign Ministry and MDIC asked Finance to
    produce something in writing to give better definition to
    their vision.  The result was the September 6 Finance
    proposal, unexpected in its form (simple Swiss formula) and
    aggressiveness.

    ¶4. (U) According to press reports, Finance used 15 as the
    formula coefficient, which would reduce Brazil's maximum
    consolidated tariff rate from 35 percent to 10.5 percent;
    its average consolidated tariff rate from 30 percent to 9.78
    percent; and its average applied tariff rate from 10.5
    percent to 7.4 percent (some reports cited a drop from 10.77
    percent to 7.39 percent in the Mercosul bloc average applied
    tariff).  As a result, final tariff levels would be below
    current applied tariff rates for 62 percent of the 8,822
    tariff lines Brazil has registered with the WTO.  In arguing
    that its proposal is not too aggressive, Finance said it had
    proposed flexibility for 5 percent of the tariff lines and
    implementation would be over 10 years.

    ¶5. (U) On September 8, daily Folha de Sao Paulo published
    the following table with eighteen examples of how the
    Finance Ministry'S tariff cutting formula would affect
    certain groups of products:

                                   Average   Effective
                                    Bound     Applied  Proposed
                                     Rate       Rate    Tariff
    Autos, tractors, auto parts     33.31      24.44     10.31
    Clothes and accessories         35.00      20.00     10.50
    Cotton                          35.00      16.30     10.50
    Shoes and gaiters               35.00      19.64     10.50
    Toys and Games                  35.00      20.00     10.50
    Arms and munitions              34.52      20.00     10.45
    Umbrellas, walking sticks       35.00      19.25     10.50
    Organic chemical prods          23.39      12.55      8.92
    Pharmaceutical prods            34.78      13.79     10.47
    Electronics - TVs, stereos      32.65      16.18     10.14
    Glass                           34.79      14.64     10.48
    Pearls, precious and
     semiprecious stones            35.00      15.24     10.50
    Perfumes and essential oils     24.42      17.46      9.28
    Instruments/apparatus, optical,
     photo, med-surgical,
     cinematographic                33.02      15.22     10.18
    Iron, cast iron, and steel      35.00      12.77     10.50
    Books, periodicals, engravings  35.00      16.00     10.50
    Paper, cartons, other
     cellulose products             33.74      13.66     10.17
    Furniture, lamps, mattresses,
     furnishings                    32.73      17.65     10.02

    ¶6. (SBU) Much to the consternation of Foreign Ministry
    negotiators, details of Finance's proposal were leaked to
    the press and widely reported.  Maia claimed the leaked
    proposal was not the final, but implied there was not much
    difference between the two versions.

    ¶7. (U) The Finance Ministry has publicly defended its
    proposal on macroeconomic grounds.  While acknowledging that
    NAMA tariff concessions constitute part of Brazil's mix for
    trade-offs in the DDA negotiations, the Finance Ministry
    argues that aggressive tariff reductions would have the
    further benefit of enhancing Brazil's overall
    competitiveness and thereby helping to spur economic growth.
    Not surprisingly, the Ministry of Agriculture was mentioned
    as supporting Finance's proposal, arguing that the country
    should be more forward leaning in the NAMA negotiations to
    obtain desired concessions in agriculture.

    ¶8. (U) Opponents to Finance's proposal mobilized quickly.
    MDIC Minister Furlan publicly opposed Finance's proposal as
    too aggressive as did Paulo Skaf, president of Sao Paulo's
    Federation of Industries (FIESP).  Ministers in a September
    19 CAMEX meeting, used in part to prepare for the WTO quad
    (US, EU, Brazil, India) meeting in Paris September 22-23,
    listened to criticism of the proposal from representatives
    of the private sector, and received studies done by the
    Institute of Applied Economic Research (Ipea) and the
    Brazilian Agency for Industrial Development (Abdi), which
    predict decimation of certain industrial sectors under
    Finance's proposal.  The powerful CUT labor union argued for
    slower liberalization citing a study by Unicamp (University
    Campinas) that links protection, with government support for
    modernization, to increased productivity.  However, while
    not supporting such an aggressive opening as advocated in
    Finance's proposal, Soraya Rosar of the National
    Confederation of Industries (CNI) told reporters that her
    organization could accept use of a simple Swiss formula,
    depending on the coefficient used.

    ¶9. (U) Despite the outcry over Finance's proposal, CAMEX
    ministers did not discard it; a final decision has been
    postponed to allow for further analysis of the proposals and
    consultation with the private sector, as well as to enable
    Ministers to better assess the overall DDA negotiating
    environment.  Brazil would have to consult with its Mercosul
    partners before offering specific tariff concessions and
    would likely consult with its G-20 partners as well.

    ¶10. (SBU) While some local commentators argue that Brazil
    needs to make a bold gesture in NAMA negotiations in order
    to pressure the EU and US into wanted concessions in
    agriculture, statements by Foreign Ministry officials
    suggest an entrenched reluctance to signal any flexibility
    in NAMA without first obtaining sufficient concrete advances
    in agriculture.  Maia confirmed as much, saying the Foreign
    Ministry had prevailed in maintaining instructions for its
    NAMA negotiators on both support for the ABI proposal and
    for conditioning movement in NAMA on advances in
    agriculture.

    ¶11. (SBU) In discussing the predicament of a limbo in which
    all sides are waiting for others to expose their potential
    for concessions, Maia implied, what negotiators had feared,
    that the Finance proposal provides some insight into
    Brazil's bottom line.  Maia phrased it as follows: it's
    reasonable to conclude that the powerful and technically
    competent Finance Ministry would not have produced a
    proposal without having a good idea of what is possible.
    But, according to Maia, the proposal generated such a strong
    reaction because it is too extreme in applying an aggressive
    formula across the entire range of industrial products
    without incorporating sufficient flexibilities.  She added,
    however, that one very positive outcome of the debate over
    Finance's proposal had been a clarification of the country's
    sensitivities.

    Comment

    ¶12. (SBU) Although it is unlikely the Finance Ministry's
    market access proposal will be adopted as is, it may at
    least pull Brazil's final position toward one of greater
    market opening.  By providing the GoB with a ready analysis
    of the implications of using a simple Swiss formula (with at
    least with one coefficient), the Finance Ministry proposal
    also may prove useful in lowering the barrier to an eventual
    acceptance by the GoB of this methodology.

    CHICOLA

`