Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 12779 / 251,287

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
2011/05/01 2011/05/02 2011/05/03 2011/05/04 2011/05/05 2011/05/06 2011/05/07 2011/05/08 2011/05/09 2011/05/10 2011/05/11 2011/05/12 2011/05/13 2011/05/14 2011/05/15 2011/05/16 2011/05/17 2011/05/18 2011/05/19 2011/05/20

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 97 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03 1985/05 1985/06
1986/05
1987/06
1988/01 1988/03 1988/07
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
1991/05
1992/01 1992/03 1992/06 1992/09 1992/12
1993/01 1993/10
1994/12
1996/11
1997/06 1997/12
2000/05 2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/06 2001/07 2001/09 2001/10 2001/11
2002/01 2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/07 2002/08 2002/09 2002/11 2002/12
2003/01 2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown Consulate Fukuoka
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guayaquil Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia Embassy Niamey Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples Consulate Naha
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito Consulate Quebec
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sapporo Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AMED ASEC AF AORC AMGT AFIN AJ AR AS AE ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AU AID AG ASCH AA AL AM AORL AEMR APECO APER ASEAN APEC ADM AFSI AFSN ABLD ADCO ABUD ASUP AN AIT AGR ACOA ANET ASIG AGMT AINF AECL AFFAIRS ADANA AY AADP ARF AGAO ACS AMCHAMS ADPM ATRN ALOW AND APCS ACAO AORG AROC AO AODE ACABQ AX AMEX AFGHANISTAN AZ ARM AQ ATFN AMBASSADOR ACBAQ AC AUC ASEX AER AVERY AGRICULTURE AFU AMG ATPDEA
BL BR BTIO BA BG BEXP BTIU BO BK BBSR BU BRUSSELS BD BM BIDEN BE BH BILAT BF BY BC BB BT BX BP BMGT BWC BN
CO CA CASC CJAN CI CH CNARC CS CU CVIS CACM CG CMGT CPAS CB CD CM CV CDG CIDA CWC CLINTON CHR CBW COE CR CE CIS CDC CONS CY CW CF CODEL CIA CROS CAPC CT CBSA CEUDA COM CFED CACS CAC CIC COPUOS CL CARSON CN CTR CONDOLEEZZA CICTE CYPRUS COUNTER COUNTRY CBE CKGR CVR COUNTERTERRORISM CITEL CLEARANCE CARICOM CSW CITT CDB CJUS CTM CAN CLMT CBC
DR DEA DEAX DHS DAO DCM DJ DA DE DOD DOMESTIC DO DK DPRK DEPT DISENGAGEMENT DOE DTRA DS DEFENSE
ECON EAID EC EUN EAIR EFIN EINV EG EXTERNAL ENRG EPET ETRD EAGR ETTC ECIN ELAB EUREM ET EU ELN ECPS ER EIND EMIN ELTN EWWT EFIS ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPA EINT ES EUC ENGR ENERG EN EZ ERD EFTA EK ETRC EI ETRN EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ESENV ENNP ENVI ECINECONCS ELECTIONS ENVR EXIM ENIV ESA EUR ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS EFINECONCS EUMEM ERNG ECONOMY ECA EINVEFIN ETC EAP EINN ECONOMIC EXBS ECUN ENGY ECONOMICS EIAR EINDETRD ECONEFIN EURN EDU ETRDEINVTINTCS ECIP EFIM EAIDS EREL EINVETC ECONCS ETRA EAIG
FR FI FAC FARC FTA FJ FAO FDA FMLN FBI FO FAS FTAA FOREIGN FOR FM FREEDOM FISO FINANCE FINR FOI
GE GOI GM GG GR GT GCC GV GH GOV GA GTIP GY GERARD GZ GAERC GANGS GTMO GL GF GAZA GLOBAL
HO HA HILLARY HYMPSK HR HU HSTC HK HEBRON HUMOR HI HURI HUMAN
IT IR IS IC IAEA IN IZ ICTY ICAO IO IMO INMARSAT INDO IL ID IRS IQ IA ICRC IDA ICJ IV IAHRC IBRD IMF IWC ILO ISLAMISTS IGAD ILC ITU ITF INRA INRO INRB ITALY IBET INTELSAT ISRAELI IRC ITRA IDP ICTR IEFIN IRAQI IPR IIP ITPGOV ITALIAN INTERNAL INTERPOL IEA INR ISRAEL IZPREL IRAJ IF ITPHUM IACI
JO JA JM JOSEPH JP JUS JAMES JOHN JOHNNIE
KJUS KPAO KIRF KDEM KCOR KPAL KNNP KCRM KWMN KIRC KMDR KIPR KWBG KTFN KGHG KE KUNR KMPI KOMC KPKO KSCA KFLU KFIN KSUM KTDB KAWC KRVC KGIC KFRD KISL KTIP KVPR KICC KHDP KCFE KTIA KSEO KCIP KZ KG KWAC KSPR KRAD KPRP KN KS KHLS KTEX KNAR KPLS KGCC KPAK KSTC KFLO KSEP KV KSTH KU KSCI KOLY KIDE KOMS KMCA KACT KHIV KBCT KDRG KBTR KAWK KPWR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KRIM KDDG KPRV KTBT KSAF KMOC KBIO KREC KCGC KPAI KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KO KVIR KFSC KMFO KID KMIG KGIT KWMM KHSA KX KPOA KNEI KCRS KR KVRP KENV KCRCM KBTS KNSD KOCI KNUP KPAONZ KNUC KNNPMNUC KERG KTLA KCSY KTRD KMRS KNPP KJUST KCMR KTER KRCM KCFC KSAC KCHG KREL KFTFN KCOM KLIG KDEMAF KAID KICA KHUM KSEC KPIN KESS KDEV KWWMN KOM KWNM KRFD KRGY KIFR KWMNCS
LO LE LY LI LA LG LH LU LTTE LAB LOG LT LABOR
MOPS MASS MX MNUC MAPP MARR MCAP MZ MR MO MT ML MA MY MTCRE MIL MD MASSMNUC MU MK MTCR MUCN MEPP MAS MEDIA MAR MI MQADHAFI MPOS MTRE MASC MG MRCRE MPS MW MARAD MC MP MOPPS MTS MLS MILI MEPN MEPI MEETINGS MERCOSUR MCC MIK MAPS MV MILITARY MDC
NZ NATO NSF NL NE NU NK NSSP NI NA NS NPT NO NDP NSC NAFTA NH NV NP NPA NSFO NG NT NW NASA NSG NORAD NATIONAL NPG NGO NR NIPP NZUS NC NEW NRR NAR NATOPREL
OTRA OIIP OPRC OMIG OREP OVIP OVP OSCE OPIC OSCI OEXC OECD OIE OPDC OAS ON OCII OPAD OBSP OFFICIALS ODIP OPCW OES OFDP OIC OCS OHUM OTR OSAC OFDA
PREL PE PGOV PHUM PINS PTER PINR PL PARM PK PM PREF PBTS PNAT PA POL PLN POLITICAL PARTIES PO PHSA PCUL PAK PGGV PAO PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBIO PAS PGIV PHUMPREL POGOV PEL PROP PP PINL PBT PTBS PG PINF PRL PMIL PALESTINIAN PDOV PRAM PSEPC PROG POV PROV POLITICS POLICY PCI POSTS PREO PAHO PHUMPGOV PREFA PSI PAIGH PARMS PTERE PRGOV PORG PS PGOF PKFK PSOE PEPR PPA PINT PMAR PRELP PNG PFOR PUNE PGOVLO PHUMBA PNR POLINT PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PDEM PECON PGOC PY PHUH PF PHUS PU
QA
RU RS RW RP RFE REGION REACTION REPORT RO RCMP ROOD RSO RM ROBERT RICE RSP RF RELATIONS RIGHTS RIGHTSPOLMIL RUPREL
SOCI SENV SY SMIG SA SNAR SW SU SO SP SCUL SZ SR SHUM SARS SF SN SC SIPRS SI SEVN STEINBERG SG SYR SWE SK SH SNARCS SAARC SPCE SNARN SNARIZ SEN SCRS SYRIA SL SENVKGHG SAN ST SIPDIS SSA SPCVIS SOFA SANC SHI
TBIO TU TRGY TW TIP TPHY TS TT TNGD TSPL TH TSPA TD TI TX TZ TC TINT TN TP TBID TF TL THPY TV TK TERRORISM TO TRSY TURKEY TFIN TAGS TR
UK US UNSC UNCHR UN USTR UNHRC UNGA UG UNEP UZ UP UNESCO UNPUOS USEU UNMIK UNDC UY UNICEF UNDP UNAUS UNCHC UNCSD USOAS UNFCYP UNIDROIT UNO UV UNHCR USUN UNCND USNC USPS USAID UE UNVIE UAE UNODC UNCHS UNFICYP UNDESCO UNC
VE VT VM VZ VI VTPREL VN VTIZ VTEG VAT VC
WMO WWARD WHTI WTRO WHO WHA WS WTO WTRQ WBG WFP WB WI WMD WIPO WZ WITH WEU WA
XL XW XS XR XA XM XD XV XK XX XG XY XF XU XI XT XH XB XQ XE XTAG XZ XC
YM YI YE YMCS
ZB ZF ZI ZK ZR ZP ZU ZO ZL ZOELLICK ZJ ZEALAND ZN ZA ZANU

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 09PANAMA519, PRIMARY PANAMA CANAL CONTRACT TO BE AWARDED

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PANAMA519.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
09PANAMA519 | 2009-06-30 17:05 | 2011-04-07 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Panama
Appears in these articles: http://www.padigital.com.pa/periodico/edicion-actual/wikileaks-panama-interna.php?story_id=1027140&codeth=1593

`

    VZCZCXYZ0025
    OO RUEHWEB

    DE RUEHZP #0519/01 1811705
    ZNY CCCCC ZZH
    O 301705Z JUN 09
    FM AMEMBASSY PANAMA
    TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3538
    INFO RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID IMMEDIATE 0334
    RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN IMMEDIATE 0019
    RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL IMMEDIATE
    RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RULSDMK/DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUMIAAA/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL IMMEDIATE

` `

    C O N F I D E N T I A L PANAMA 000519

    SIPDIS

    DEPT OF COMMERCE - MATTHEW GAISFORD
    DEPT OF TREASURY - SARA SENICH

    E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/29/2019
    TAGS: ECON EINV ETRD MARR PM EWWT
    SUBJECT: PRIMARY PANAMA CANAL CONTRACT TO BE AWARDED

    REF: 2009 PANAMA 195

    Classified By: Ambassador Stephenson for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

    -------
    SUMMARY
    -------

    1) (C) The public ceremony to announce a winner for the
    Panama Canal's $3.35 billion third set of locks contract is
    expected to be July 9. Three competing consortia submitted
    bids and are led by the following firms: 1) Bechtel
    (American), 2) ACS (Spanish), and 3) Sacyr (Spanish).
    Reportedly, both Bechtel and ACS submitted technically
    compliant bids priced over $4 billion; however, there are
    doubts about Sacyr's technical and financial compliance.
    Unfortunately, there is no clear standard for minimal
    technical compliance and how a technically non-compliant bid
    would be disqualified. Sacyr's price reportedly is lower
    than $4 billion and price weighs heavily in the determination
    of the winner. Additionally, Sacyr's bid is reportedly
    supported by government export credit agencies reinsuring
    their bonding syndicate, which is against the spirit of the
    Panama Canal Authority's (ACP) public efforts to not involve
    sovereign guarantees (the inclusion of which masks a
    consortium's financial well-being and provides a financial
    bidding advantage). Post will continue to monitor the
    process, to advocate for Bechtel, and to promote U.S. based
    content.

    ------------------------------
    A WINNER WILL SOON BE DECLARED
    (IF THE BID IS RIGHT)
    ---------------------

    ¶2. (SBU) The public ceremony to announce a winner for the
    Panama Canal's third set of locks contract is expected to be
    held between July 2 and July 14, according to private
    statements made by representatives of the ACP and Canal
    Expansion Project Advisor CH2MHill to Embassy and consortia
    staff. July 9 is the most commonly reported date. As
    explained in reftel, the financial portion of the bids will
    be opened and scored during a ceremony. The financial score
    (45% of the total points) will then be combined with the
    technical score (55% of the total points), which is currently
    being calculated by a team of experts. The winner will then
    be instantaneously and publicly announced. However, if the
    winner's financial bid is higher than the ACP's price cap
    (which will be revealed moments before the consortia's
    financial bids are opened), the winner will be asked to lower
    their price to within the price cap. If the winner does not
    accept the price cap price, then the ACP will allow all
    consortia, who submitted technically and financially
    compliant bids, to resubmit price proposals. These new price
    proposals would then be combined with already determined
    technical proposals and a new winner would be declared. If
    the price is still too high, the ACP can raise its price
    ceiling (which would need approval by the National Assembly)
    or void the entire bidding process.

    --------------------------
    COMPETITORS AND THEIR BIDS
    --------------------------

    ¶3. (C) Three consortia submitted bids and are led by the
    following firms: 1) Bechtel (American), 2) ACS (Spanish), and
    3) Sacyr (Spanish). According to a representative from the
    Canal Expansion Project Advisor (American firm CH2MHill),
    each consortium submitted differing bids. Bechtel reportedly
    produced the "Rolls Royce" set of locks, which exceeded ACP
    requirements, including for throughput. (As laid out in the
    public bid documents, a consortium does not receive extra
    points for exceeding requirements.) ACS reportedly more
    closely followed the ACP's requirements. Sacyr, according to
    CH2MHill, submitted a technical proposal, which may not be
    minimally acceptable. Due to the publicly available criteria
    for scoring the technical proposals and assuming initial
    reports are accurate, it is anticipated that Bechtel and ACS
    will receive roughly the same technical score. Sacyr, if
    they are found technically compliant/viable, would score only
    slightly lower. Thus, if the technical scores are close,
    price will be the determining factor in the formula to
    determine the winner.

    ¶4. (C) Reports of the prices attached to the bids roughly
    track the quality. According to consortia members, both
    Bechtel and ACS have bids that "start with a 4" - meaning
    over $4 billion. Sacyr, via consortium member Impregilo,
    leaked to the press the price of $3.7 billion on April 21 and
    stated that they have the lowest price. Depending on the
    accuracy of the leaked price data, Sacyr's financial score
    could be significantly better than Bechtel's and ACS's.
    (Leaking the bid price is a breach of the bidding rules.
    Impregilo recently broke the bidding rules again by declaring
    that the Sacyr-led consortium has the highest technical
    score. Absent a breach in ACP security, this information was
    unknowable at the time of the statements. ACS and Bechtel
    have both written strong protest letters to the ACP.) Post's
    Senior Commercial Officer reports that during an unrelated
    meeting, a senior ACP official accidentally stated the ACP
    price ceiling is $3.62 billion.

    -------------------------
    SACYR - POTENTIAL SPOILER
    -------------------------

    ¶5. (C) When combined the financial and technical components
    of the bid are combined in 45% and 55% proportions
    respectively, the Sacyr bid could win this "best value"
    competition. A Sacyr win could be disconcerting. Sacyr is
    considered bankrupt and is being propped up by the Spanish
    government. Therefore, besides possibly having a design that
    is not workable, a Sacyr wins adds financial risk to the
    locks construction. The bid process has protections against
    non-compliant bids, if the ACP chooses to activate the
    protections. If a bid is technically non-compliant (and the
    ACP has not detailed the exact parameters of a technically
    non-compliant bid), the ACP has the option to not even open
    the price envelope. Bechtel representatives told the
    Ambassador on June 24 that they prefer this path. If a bid
    is financially non-compliant, the ACP possibly can reject the
    offer. A bid would be financially non-compliant if a
    consortium failed a financial health audit, which will be
    conducted on the winner. All consortia were determined by
    the ACP to be financially healthy as of November 15, 2007
    during the pre-qualification phase. Based upon previous
    decisions to keep all consortia in the process, the ACP is
    not expected to disqualify any consortium.

    --------------------------------
    SACYR - RECEIVING STATE SUPPORT?
    --------------------------------

    ¶6. (C) Based upon reports from representatives from competing
    consortia, Sacyr's $50 million performance bond is backed by
    the government export credit agencies of Spain
    (CESCE-Secretaria de Estado de Comercio), France
    (COFACE-Compagnie Francaise D'Assurance Pour le Commerce
    Extereur), and Italy (SACE-Servize Assicurativi del Commercio
    Estero). Sacyr gained a competitive advantage by securing
    the near equivalent of a sovereign guarantee apparently at no
    additional cost and no additional scrutiny of their books
    (vice Bechtel and ACS who had to purchase the bond on the
    open market and subjected their firms to some level of
    financial evaluation). This arrangement goes against ACP
    Administrator Aleman's publicly expressed desire not to have
    sovereign guarantees, because the performance bond ideally
    should serve as a surrogate for a consortium's financial
    health. If a consortium could not provide the $50 million
    performance bond, then the consortium was probably not
    financially healthy. If Sacyr wins, litigation from Bechtel
    or ACS is likely. For ACS, there is the added dimension of
    why the Spanish government is helping one Spanish consortium
    and not the other. It should be noted, however, that the ACP
    has not prohibited use of export credit agencies in the
    bidding process.

    -------
    COMMENT
    -------

    ¶7. (SBU) In essence, the ACP created a transparent process
    and now - due to rigid adherence to that process - may choose
    a consortium that provides the "best value," on paper, but
    may not be capable of completing the project. It appears
    that the ACP wished to retain flexibility by not clearly
    demarcating the floor of technical non-compliance and not
    deviating from its rules to ask Sacyr for a comprehensive
    audit before the bids are open. (We understand that Sacyr may
    have provided year-to-date 2009 financial data that, due to
    the limited time window of that data, could continue to mask
    Sacyr's true financial condition.) Post will continue to
    monitor the bidding process closely to ensure fairness. Post
    maintains frequent communication with Bechtel representatives
    in order to coordinate actions to assure Bechtel is not
    unfairly disadvantaged.
    STEPHENSON

`