Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 12576 / 251,287

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
2011/05/01 2011/05/02 2011/05/03 2011/05/04 2011/05/05 2011/05/06 2011/05/07 2011/05/08 2011/05/09 2011/05/10 2011/05/11 2011/05/12 2011/05/13 2011/05/14 2011/05/15 2011/05/16

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 96 97 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03 1985/05 1985/06
1986/05
1987/06
1988/01
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
1991/05
1992/01 1992/06 1992/12
1993/10
1996/11
1997/12
2000/05 2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/06 2001/07 2001/09 2001/10 2001/11
2002/01 2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/07 2002/08 2002/09 2002/11
2003/01 2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown Consulate Fukuoka
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guayaquil Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia Embassy Niamey Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples Consulate Naha
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito Consulate Quebec
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sapporo Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AF AMGT ASEC AMED AEMR APER AORC AR ARF AG AS ABLD APCS AID AU APECO AFFAIRS AFIN ADANA AJ ADCO AA AECL AADP ACAO ANET AY APEC AORG ASEAN ABUD AGR AROC AO AE AM AODE AL ACABQ AGMT AX AMEX ATRN AFGHANISTAN AZ ASUP AND ARM AQ ATFN AMBASSADOR ACBAQ AFSI AFSN AGAO AC ADPM ASIG AUC ASEX AER AVERY AGRICULTURE ACOA ASCH AFU AINF AMG ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AORL ADM AN AIT AMCHAMS ALOW ACS
BR BA BK BD BU BEXP BO BM BT BRUSSELS BIDEN BTIO BE BY BB BL BG BP BC BBSR BH BX BF BWC BN BTIU BMGT BILAT
CA CASC CS CU CWC CBW CO CH CE CI CDG CVIS CG CM CICTE CMGT COUNTER CPAS COUNTRY CJAN CIDA CD CT CODEL CBE CW CDC CFED CONS CONDOLEEZZA CL COM CR CKGR CHR CVR CIA CLINTON CY COUNTERTERRORISM CITEL CLEARANCE COE CN CARICOM CB CACS CSW CIC CITT CACM CDB CF CJUS CTM CAN CLMT CBC CAC CNARC CV CROS CIS CBSA CEUDA CARSON CAPC COPUOS CTR
DR DA DK DHS DPRK DEPT DEA DJ DISENGAGEMENT DE DOMESTIC DOD DOE DTRA DS DEFENSE DO DAO DCM DEAX
EFIN ECON EAID ENRG EAIR EC ELAB ETRD EINV ETTC ECIN EPET EG EAGR EFIS EUN ECPS EU EN EIND ELTN EINT ECA EPA EWWT EMIN ENVI ENGR ETRC EXTERNAL EI ELN ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS ET EZ EK ES EINVEFIN ETRDECONWTOCS ER EUR ETC ENVR EAP ENIV ECONOMY EINN EFTA ECONOMIC EXBS ELECTIONS ECUN ENGY ECONOMICS EIAR EINDETRD ECONEFIN EURN EDU ETRDEINVTINTCS ECIP EFIM EAIDS EREL EINVETC ECONCS EUMEM ETRA ESA ECINECONCS EAIG ETRO EUREM EUC ENERG ERD EEPET EUNCH EXIM EFINECONCS ETRN ESENV ENNP EINVECONSENVCSJA ERNG
FI FR FTA FARC FJ FTAA FAC FBI FAO FAS FM FINR FREEDOM FOR FINANCE FOREIGN FOI FDA FMLN FO FISO
GV GG GM GH GOV GOI GL GT GF GR GCC GAERC GE GZ GA GAZA GY GLOBAL GTIP GERARD GANGS GTMO
HA HR HO HK HU HILLARY HI HURI HUMAN HYMPSK HSTC HEBRON HUMOR
IS IC IR IT IN IAEA IBRD ITU ILO IZ ID ICRC IPR ISRAELI IIP IMO INMARSAT IWC IV ITPGOV ITALIAN IO INTERNAL IRS ICTY IA INTERPOL IRAQI IEA INRB IL ICAO ICJ INR IMF ITALY IAHRC IZPREL IRAJ ITF IQ ILC IF ITPHUM ISRAEL IACI ICTR IEFIN INTELSAT INDO IDP IRC ITRA IBET INRA INRO IDA IGAD ISLAMISTS
JA JUS JO JOSEPH JM JP JAMES JOHN JOHNNIE
KCRM KNNP KDEM KFLO KTIP KFRD KWMN KJUS KSCA KSEP KFLU KOLY KHLS KCOR KTBT KPAL KISL KIRF KTFN KPRV KAWC KUNR KV KIPR KTIA KTDB KPAO KZ KBCT KN KPKO KSTH KSUM KIDE KS KU KWBG KPAONZ KOMC KNUC KMDR KE KNNPMNUC KSTC KWAC KERG KACT KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KSCI KGHG KHDP KVPR KICC KPRP KBIO KCIP KTLA KMPI KHIV KCSY KTRD KCFE KGIC KRVC KNAR KSPR KMRS KNPP KDRG KJUST KMCA KOCI KPWR KFIN KFSC KCMR KTER KRCM KIRC KSEO KNEI KCFC KSAF KSAC KR KG KCHG KAWK KGCC KPLS KREL KMFO KFTFN KTEX KCOM KO KLIG KDEMAF KBTR KRAD KGIT KVRP KPAI KICA KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KHUM KREC KSEC KPIN KESS KDEV KWWMN KOM KBTS KCRS KWNM KRFD KVIR KMIG KDDG KRGY KMOC KIFR KID KAID KWMNCS KPOA KPAK KRIM KHSA KENV KOMS KWMM KNSD KX KCGC KCRCM KNUP
LE LY LI LH LTTE LG LO LAB LOG LT LABOR LU LA
MARR MNUC MX MOPS MO MCAP MASS MY MZ MTCRE MIL ML MPOS MP MG MD MK MA MI MOPPS MR MTS MLS MILI MAR MU MEPN MAPP MEPI MASC MEETINGS MERCOSUR MW MAS MTCR MT MCC MIK MARAD MAPS MV MILITARY MDC MEPP MEDIA MASSMNUC MUCN MC MTRE MRCRE MQADHAFI
NZ NU NP NO NATO NI NL NS NAFTA NDP NIPP NPT NE NZUS NH NR NA NSF NG NSG NC NEW NRR NATIONAL NT NASA NAR NV NSSP NK NATOPREL NPG NSFO NSC NORAD NW NGO NPA
OTRA OVIP OPCW OPDC OREP OAS OPIC OECD OFDP OPRC OIIP OEXC ODIP OSCE OIE OSCI OTR OMIG OSAC OBSP OFDA OFFICIALS OVP OIC OHUM ON OCII OES OPAD OCS
PGOV PREL PRAM PTER PREF PARM PHUM PINR PA PE PM PK PINS PMIL PROP PALESTINIAN PBTS PARMS PHSA POL PO PROG POLITICS PBIO PL PTERE PRGOV PORG PP PS PGOF PKFK PSOE PEPR PPA PINT PMAR PRELP PREFA PINF PNG POLICY PFOR PUNE PGOVLO PAO PHUMBA PSEPC PNAT PNR POLINT PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PDEM PECON PROV PBT PAK PGOC PY PLN PGIV PHUH PF PRL PG PHUS PTBS PU POV POLITICAL PARTIES PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PINL PAS PDOV PHUMPGOV POGOV PREO PEL PHUMPREL PCI PAHO PSI PAIGH POSTS
QA
RO RU RS RP RW RICE RM RSP RF RCMP RIGHTS RIGHTSPOLMIL RUPREL RELATIONS REACTION RFE ROOD REGION REPORT RSO ROBERT
SENV SMIG SNAR SOCI SP SY SYRIA SZ SU SA SCUL SW SO SL SR SENVKGHG SF SI SEVN SARS SN SC SAN STEINBERG SG ST SIPDIS SNARIZ SNARN SSA SK SPCVIS SOFA SYR SANC SWE SHI SEN SHUM SH SPCE SNARCS SIPRS SAARC SCRS
TSPL TF TU TRGY TS TBIO TT TK TPHY TI TSPA TERRORISM TH TIP TC TNGD TW TX TO TRSY TN TURKEY TL TV TD TZ TBID TINT TP TFIN TAGS TR THPY
UK UNGA UN UNCHC UNSC UV US UY USTR UNHRC UP UG USUN UNESCO USPS UZ USEU UNCHR USAID UNMIK UNHCR UE UNVIE UAE UNO UNDP UNAUS USOAS UNODC UNCHS UNFICYP UNEP UNIDROIT UNDESCO UNC UNPUOS UNCSD UNDC UNICEF USNC UNCND
VE VT VZ VTPREL VM VTIZ VAT VN VC VI VTEG
WTO WTRO WS WI WZ WHO WBG WB WWARD WHA WITH WIPO WTRQ WEU WMO WA WHTI WFP WMD
XF XM XG XT XZ XA XY XK XL XW XV XB XU XS XR XH XD XC XX XE XQ XTAG XI
YM YI YE YMCS
ZI ZU ZR ZB ZJ ZP ZEALAND ZN ZL ZA ZK ZF ZANU ZO ZOELLICK

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 04OTTAWA3431, SUMMIT AGENDA ON COMMON PROSPERITY: THOUGHTS ON

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04OTTAWA3431.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
04OTTAWA3431 | 2004-12-21 21:35 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa

`

    This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

` `

    UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 003431

    SIPDIS

    STATE FOR WHA/CAN:TBREESE, AHOLST; EB/TPP/BTA/EWH:AARON

    WHITE HOUSE/NSC FOR FARYAR SHIRZAD

    STATE PASS USTR FOR SAGE CHANDLER

    USDOC FOR 4320/OFFICE OF NAFTA/GWORD/TFOX; 3134/OIO/WESTERN
    HEMISPHERE

    SENSITIVE

    E.O. 12958: N/A
    TAGS: ETRD CA
    SUBJECT: SUMMIT AGENDA ON COMMON PROSPERITY: THOUGHTS ON
    NEXT STEPS ON THE REGULATORY FRONT

    ¶1.  (SBU) SUMMARY: AT THE BILATERAL SUMMIT ON NOVEMBER 30,
    2004, THE PRESIDENT AND CANADIAN PM PAUL MARTIN AGREED TO AN
    AGENDA FOR "COMMON SECURITY, COMMON PROSPERITY" THAT
    COMMITTED THE TWO SIDES TO "PURSUE JOINT APPROACHES TO
    PARTNERSHIPS, CONSENSUS STANDARDS, AND SMARTER REGULATIONS
    THAT RESULT IN GREATER EFFICIENCY AND COMPETITIVENESS, WHILE
    ENHANCING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF OUR CITIZENS".  WE
    UNDERSTAND THAT DISCUSSIONS ARE ALREADY UNDERWAY AMONG
    CAPITALS ABOUT HOW TO MOVE FORWARD ON THIS COMMITMENT.

    ¶2.  (SBU) CANADIAN INTEREST IN THIS AGENDA PROBABLY STEMS
    FROM THE RELEASE OF THE "SMART REGULATION" REPORT, WHICH
    MADE IT CLEAR THAT NORTH AMERICAN STANDARDS AND REGULATORY
    REGIMES SHOULD BE A PRIORITY FOR CANADIAN REGULATORS.  WE
    BELIEVE THAT THE COMBINATION OF A BILATERAL COMMITMENT TO
    JOINT APPROACHES AND GOC CONSIDERATION OF THE SMART
    REGULATION AGENDA PRESENTS AN OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP A
    PROCESS THAT CAN EVENTUALLY REDUCE REGULATORY DIVERGENCE -
    THE "TYRANNY OF SMALL DIFFERENCES" THAT INHIBITS TRADE AND
    REDUCES CONSUMER CHOICE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER.  THIS
    CABLE DESCRIBES THE "SMART REGULATION" INITIATIVE AND
    OUTLINES OUR IDEAS FOR MOVING TOWARD MORE LONG-TERM, BROAD-
    BASED REGULATORY COOPERATION. END SUMMARY

    INTRODUCTION: THE SMART REGULATION INITIATIVE
    ---------------------------------------------
    ¶2.  (U) FOR CANADA, THE BENEFITS OF NAFTA HAVE BEEN CLEAR,
    INCLUDING THE DOUBLING OF TRADE THAT IS NOW STRAINING BORDER
    INFRASTRUCTURE.  FURTHER GROWTH, HOWEVER, WHILE LIKELY, WILL
    BE CONSTRAINED BOTH BY BORDER INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITATIONS,
    WHICH ARE BEING ADDRESSED IN THE SMART BORDER PROCESS, AND
    BY REGULATORY DIFFERENCES WHICH CONTINUE TO IMPEDE ENTRY OF
    NEW PRODUCTS INTO THE MARKET AND LIMIT CONSUMER CHOICE.

    3.(U)  CANADA HAS JUST COMPLETED A THOROUGH STAKEHOLDER
    REVIEW OF ITS REGULATORY PROCESSES AND STRUCTURE.  THE
    CANADIAN "EXTERNAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SMART REGULATION",
    CONVENED IN 2003, RELEASED ITS FINAL REPORT IN SEPTEMBER
    ¶2004.  THE COMMITTEE OBSERVED THAT ".CANADA AND THE UNITED
    STATES MAINTAIN PARALLEL PROCESSES AND STRUCTURES ACROSS
    ALMOST ALL AREAS OF REGULATORY ACTIVITY. THEIR TWO SETS OF
    PROCESSES REFLECT A CONVERGENCE IN POLICY OBJECTIVES AND
    REGULATORY PROCEDURES. HOWEVER, MUCH OF THIS WORK IS
    DUPLICATIVE, PARTICULARLY GIVEN THE INTEGRATED NORTH
    AMERICAN MARKET. THE OUTCOME CAN BE POOR REGULATORY AND
    ECONOMIC RESULTS AND HIGHER COSTS FOR GOVERNMENTS, CONSUMERS
    AND BUSINESSES."

    4.(U)  THE COMMITTEE MADE THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS,
    AMONG OTHERS:

    --THE GOC SHOULD INCLUDE INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY
    COOPERATION AS A DISTINCT OBJECTIVE OF CANADIAN FOREIGN
    POLICY, WITH A PRIMARY AND IMMEDIATE FOCUS ON NORTH AMERICA,
    AND DEVELOP AN AGENDA FOR NORTH AMERICAN REGULATORY
    COOPERATION.

    --CANADA-SPECIFIC REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SHOULD DIFFER FROM
    INTERNATIONAL OR NORTH AMERICAN MODELS ONLY WHERE THERE ARE
    IMPORTANT NATIONAL PRIORITIES, UNIQUE CANADIAN CONDITIONS OR
    CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, OR EXISTING MODELS ARE INADEQUATE TO
    CANADIAN POLICY OBJECTIVES;

    --CANADA SHOULD PROMOTE JOINT PRODUCT REVIEWS AND MOVE
    TOWARD ACCEPTING U.S. AND EU PRODUCT APPROVALS IN SECTORS
    WITH WELL-ESTABLISHED CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES;

    --CANADA SHOULD STRENGTHEN INTERAGENCY REGULATORY
    COORDINATION AND DEVELOP OVERARCHING REGULATORY POLICY
    FRAMEWORKS FOR KEY SECTORS.

    IN ORDER TO PUT THESE RECOMMENDATIONS INTO OPERATION, THE
    COMMITTEE PROPOSED THAT THE GOC FORM MULTISTAKEHOLDER "SWAT
    TEAMS" TO IDENTIFY TROUBLESOME REGULATORY DIFFERENCES AND
    PROPOSE SOLUTIONS.  THE COMMITTEE IDENTIFIED AS PRIORITY
    AREAS:

    --MANUFACTURING/PRODUCT APPROVAL;
    --BIOTECHNOLOGY/LIFE SCIENCES;
    --ENABLING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR FIRST NATIONS;
    --ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESSES; AND
    --OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT.

    (THE FULL REPORT IS AVAILABLE AT
    HTTP://WWW.SMARTREGULATION.GC.CA)

    A "SMART" NORTH AMERICAN PROCESS?
    ---------------------------------
    5.(SBU)  We suggest that, in the context of our commitments
    in the November 30 statement, Washington agencies think
    about developing a broad-based bilateral or trilateral
    review of regulations that draws on these recommendations.
    While such a process could yield short-term deliverables,
    more importantly, it would set the stage for real progress
    in finding and eliminating a broader list of longstanding
    regulatory barriers than the NAI process has addressed so
    far.

    BRINGING REGULATORY EXPERTS TOGETHER
    ------------------------------------
    6.(SBU)  In our view, the logical first step would be to
    develop channels of communication between the regulatory
    oversight bodies, OMB and the GoC Privy Council Office (PCO)
    to exchange information on regulatory initiatives underway,
    set compatible timetables where possible and review existing
    regulations to identify areas for revision, or areas where
    we could negotiate mutual recognition agreements.  U.S.
    officials could also share experience on strengthening
    regulatory oversight and interagency coordination, a key
    recommendation of the Smart Regulation report.

    7.(SBU)  The agenda for these exchanges could include review
    of existing promising models, such as the joint PMRA and EPA
    pesticide review process, and a look at sectors identified
    in the Smart Regulation report and previous NAI discussions.
    These could include some aspects of drug approvals,
    processed food containers, and federal/state/provincial
    regulatory requirements for construction products.

    INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS
    ----------------------
    8.(SBU)  Second, Washington agencies may also want to
    explore how to involve business and other stakeholders.
    Options include expanding the Canadian approach to convene
    North American "SWAT teams" of government, industry and
    consumer representatives that review regulatory issues by
    sector and report back to governments.  Another model might
    be a North American equivalent of the "Transatlantic
    Business Dialogue (TABD)" which effectively articulated
    business priorities for US-EU regulatory cooperation in the
    1990s.

    9.(SBU)  Alternatively, or in parallel, both (or all three)
    governments could encourage maximum participation by
    stakeholders in the "smart regulation" process within
    Canada.  The Committee urged the GoC to designate a Minister
    to invite interested stakeholders to identify those
    regulatory differences for which elimination would not
    impede Canadian social (including health and safety) and
    environmental objectives. In any case, we should ensure that
    the USG and the U.S. private sector participate in this
    process as stakeholders and make recommendations by June
    ¶2005.

    TIMETABLE AND DELIVERABLES
    --------------------------
    10.(SBU)  Under this framework we could call on regulatory
    officials to reach certain objectives within twelve months,
    to serve as deliverables at a future NAFTA Summit or meeting
    of the New Partnership in North America.  Examples of twelve-
    month deliverables include:

    --Swat Team Reports: Stakeholder groups or "Swat Teams"
    issue reports on priority list of regulatory differences to
    address via harmonization or mutual recognition.  Such a
    list could include both bilateral and trilateral priorities,
    depending on feasibility.

    --Regulatory oversight bodies: OMB and PCO develop mechanism
    for consulting on new regulatory projects, decision
    mechanism for selecting regulations for parallel
    consideration or MRAs.  (e.g. applying EPA/PMRA pesticide
    model to other agencies)

    --Joint approvals: Independent agencies develop consultation
    process for joint approvals.  Example: CFIA and USDA could
    look into simultaneous approval processes for new seed
    varieties.

    --Initiation of joint reviews: An 18-month deliverable could
    be announcement/Federal Register/Gazette notices of first
    joint reviews of regulations in priority sectors.

    11.(SBU)  Such a framework would be a long-term investment
    in addition to an effort to identify "low-hanging fruit" in
    the regulatory sphere, although such a broad-based process
    might bring to light additional areas where early results
    are possible beyond those already identified in NAI
    discussions.  Post (Econ and FCS) would be prepared to
    support the process by working intensively with local U.S.
    and Canadian business contacts and regulators, DOC, and USTR
    to identify possible items for short, medium and long-term
    work programs across a number of sectors.

`