Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 12566 / 251,287

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
2011/05/01 2011/05/02 2011/05/03 2011/05/04 2011/05/05 2011/05/06 2011/05/07 2011/05/08 2011/05/09 2011/05/10 2011/05/11 2011/05/12 2011/05/13 2011/05/14 2011/05/15

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 96 97 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03 1985/06
1986/05
1987/06
1988/01
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
1991/05
1992/01 1992/06 1992/12
1993/10
1996/11
1997/12
2000/05 2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/06 2001/07 2001/09 2001/10 2001/11
2002/01 2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/07 2002/08 2002/09 2002/11
2003/01 2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown Consulate Fukuoka
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guayaquil Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia Embassy Niamey Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples Consulate Naha
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito Consulate Quebec
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sapporo Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AR AF ASEC AORC AU AMGT AADP AMBASSADOR AS AEMR AFIN AJ AM AFFAIRS ASEAN AODE APEC AE ABLD ACBAQ APECO AFSI AFSN AY AO ABUD AG AGAO AROC AC APER AMED ATRN ADPM ADCO ASIG AL ASUP ARF AUC ASEX AER AVERY AGRICULTURE ACOA ASCH AA AFU AID ALOW AINF AMG ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AORL AIT ANET ADM AN AMCHAMS ACS APCS ADANA AECL ACAO AORG AGR ACABQ AGMT AX AMEX AFGHANISTAN AZ AND ARM AQ ATFN
BR BA BEXP BU BY BM BBSR BK BL BO BRUSSELS BG BB BD BTIO BIDEN BP BE BH BX BF BT BWC BN BTIU BILAT BC BMGT
CI CU CA CVIS CH CO CS CASC CM CMGT CLINTON CT CWC CJAN CARICOM CB CE CN CONDOLEEZZA CG CW CPAS CACS CY CFED CSW CIDA CIC CITT CBW CONS CDG CD CHR CACM CDB COE CDC CR CF CJUS CTM CODEL CLMT CBC CAN COUNTERTERRORISM CAC COUNTER CV CNARC COM CROS CIA COPUOS CIS CARSON CTR CBSA CEUDA CICTE COUNTRY CBE CAPC CL CKGR CVR CITEL CLEARANCE
DJ DR DISENGAGEMENT DE DA DOMESTIC DEA DOD DOE DTRA DS DEFENSE DHS DO DAO DCM DEAX DK DPRK DEPT
ECA EU ENRG EPET ETTC ETRD ELAB EC ECON EFIN EG EINV ES EAIR EAID EFIS ELTN EWWT EAGR EIND EUN ECIN ER ET ELECTIONS EXTERNAL EMIN ECPS ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS ENIV ENGR EI ECUN EFTA ENGY ECONOMICS EN EIAR EINDETRD EUR EZ EREL ECONEFIN EINT EURN EDU ETRDEINVTINTCS ECIP EFIM EAIDS EK EPA ENVR EINVETC ECONCS ECONOMIC ELN EUMEM ETRA ESA ECINECONCS EAIG ETRO EUREM ESENV ETRC ENVI EINVECONSENVCSJA ENNP EEPET EUC ENERG EUNCH EXIM ERD ERNG EFINECONCS ETRN EINVEFIN ETRDECONWTOCS ETC EAP ECONOMY EINN EXBS
FTAA FR FAO FI FAC FOI FREEDOM FJ FMLN FARC FDA FTA FBI FM FOREIGN FO FISO FOR FAS FINR FINANCE
GM GT GG GOI GZ GAZA GR GAERC GV GCC GY GA GOV GE GLOBAL GH GTIP GERARD GANGS GTMO GL GF
HO HILLARY HK HR HA HURI HU HUMAN HYMPSK HSTC HEBRON HUMOR HI
IIP IC IR IAEA IT ICAO IN IAHRC IZ IS INTERNAL ISRAELI IMF IBRD IWC INTERPOL IO ISLAMISTS ITALY ITALIAN IRAQI ILO IPR IV IRS INRB IMO ID IZPREL IRAJ ICTY ICRC ITF IQ ILC ITU IF ITPHUM IL ISRAEL IACI INMARSAT ICTR ICJ IEFIN INTELSAT INDO IA INRA INRO IDP IRC ITRA IDA IGAD IBET ITPGOV INR IEA
JA JP JO JAMES JOSEPH JM JUS JOHN JOHNNIE
KDEM KIRF KPAO KCRM KNNP KIPR KMDR KWBG KPAL KSUM KCOR KISL KTIA KSCA KWMN KFRD KFLO KDEMAF KZ KN KS KJUS KOMC KBTR KE KUNR KSEP KPLS KRVC KV KTFN KTIP KMPI KIRC KOLY KPKO KIDE KMRS KFLU KSAF KGIC KRAD KU KHLS KOCI KSTH KGHG KAWC KICC KG KSPR KPRP KDRG KGIT KVPR KGCC KSEO KMCA KSTC KBIO KHIV KBCT KPAI KICA KTDB KACT KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KHUM KREC KSEC KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPIN KCOM KESS KDEV KCFE KNUC KAWK KWWMN KPRV KCIP KHDP KOM KBTS KCRS KNPP KWNM KRFD KVIR KLIG KMIG KTEX KDDG KRGY KR KMOC KPAONZ KNAR KIFR KCGC KID KSAC KAID KWMNCS KNEI KPOA KTER KFIN KWAC KFSC KPAK KHSA KMFO KPWR KSCI KRIM KENV KWMM KO KOMS KX KVRP KCRCM KNUP KTBT KNNPMNUC KERG KTLA KCSY KTRD KJUST KNSD KCMR KRCM KCFC KCHG KREL KFTFN
LY LI LH LTTE LE LO LG LT LABOR LU LA LAB LOG
MOPS MARR MNUC MASC MASS MCAP MZ MEETINGS MERCOSUR MX MG MW MIL MTCRE MAS MO MTCR MD MK MP MY MR MT MCC MIK MU ML MARAD MA MAPS MV MPOS MILITARY MDC MQADHAFI MEPP MRCRE MEDIA MAPP MEPN MI MUCN MASSMNUC MAR MC MTRE MOPPS MTS MLS MILI MEPI
NATO NL NU NZ NPT NI NRR NA NATIONAL NIPP NO NAFTA NT NSF NS NE NASA NP NAR NV NG NSSP NK NDP NR NATOPREL NEW NPG NSG NSFO NORAD NPA NGO NSC NH NW NZUS NC
OVIP OTRA OPRC OSCE OFDA OAS OIIP OPCW OPDC OEXC OPIC OREP OFFICIALS ODIP OECD OMIG OFDP OSCI OVP OIC OIE OHUM OPAD ON OCII OBSP OCS OES OTR OSAC
PGOV PHUM PREL PTER PINR PARM PROP PA PBTS PHSA PREF PM POL PK PINS PE PALESTINIAN PL PFOR PUNE PGOVLO PAO POLITICS PO PHUMBA PSEPC PNAT PNR POLINT PGOVE PROG PHALANAGE PARTY PDEM PECON PROV PSOE PBT PAK PP PGOC PY PMIL PLN PMAR PGIV PHUH PBIO PF PRL PG PHUS PTBS PU PINL POV PEL POLITICAL PARTIES PCUL PHUMPREL POLICY PGGV PAS PSA PDOV PCI PRAM PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PHUMPGOV POGOV PREO PAHO PREFA PSI PAIGH POSTS PARMS PTERE PRGOV PORG PS PGOF PKFK PEPR PPA PINT PRELP PINF PNG
QA
RU RS RFE RICE RW RCMP RO RP RIGHTS RIGHTSPOLMIL RUPREL RF RELATIONS RM ROBERT REACTION REGION ROOD REPORT RSO RSP
SU SENV SNAR SOCI SMIG SW SO SCUL SY SR SP SA SZ SF SIPDIS STEINBERG SN SNARIZ SG SNARN SSA SK SI SPCVIS SOFA SC SL SIPRS SARS SYR SANC SEVN SWE SHI SEN SHUM SYRIA SH SPCE SNARCS SAARC SCRS SENVKGHG SAN ST
TRGY TU TX TSPA TZ TW TPHY TSPL TBIO TN TC TS TF TI TIP TH TINT TNGD TP TD TFIN TAGS TK TL TV TT TERRORISM TR THPY TO TRSY TURKEY TBID
UK UN UP UG US UNSC UNGA UNHCR USEU UY UNESCO USTR USOAS UZ UNODC UNCHS UNFICYP UNEP UNIDROIT UNHRC UNDESCO UNDP UNC UNO UNMIK UNAUS UV UNCHR UNPUOS UNCSD USUN UNCND UNDC USNC UNICEF UNCHC USPS USAID UE UNVIE UAE
VE VM VZ VT VTPREL VTIZ VAT VN VC VI VTEG
WITH WHO WI WTRO WIPO WTO WS WTRQ WWARD WHA WHTI WEU WZ WMD WMO WA WBG WFP WB
XF XG XT XK XM XR XZ XA XV XW XL XH XE XB XU XQ XS XD XY XC XX XTAG XI
YE YM YI YMCS
ZP ZR ZB ZI ZA ZK ZU ZF ZO ZANU ZOELLICK ZEALAND ZL ZJ ZN

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 10STATE16421, MEETING OF THE FOOD AID COMMITTEE, FEBRUARY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10STATE16421.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
10STATE16421 | 2010-02-23 16:47 | 2011-05-02 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Secretary of State

`

    VZCZCXRO1125
    PP RUEHIK
    DE RUEHC #6421/01 0541650
    ZNR UUUUU ZZH
    P 231647Z FEB 10
    FM SECSTATE WASHDC
    TO EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
    RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN PRIORITY 7493
    RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 6542
    RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 0207
    RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1508
    RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 2415
    RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY

` `

    UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STATE 016421

    SIPDIS

    E.O. 12958: N/A
    TAGS: EAID EC ETRD
    SUBJECT: MEETING OF THE FOOD AID COMMITTEE, FEBRUARY
    15-16, 2010

    REF: STATE 130895

    STATE 00016421  001.2 OF 003

    ¶1. (U) SUMMARY.  The Food Aid Committee held an
    "extraordinary meeting" in London February 15-16 to continue
    discussions on the future of the 1999 Food Aid Convention.
    Members discussed their vision of a convention as well as its
    key objectives, the convention's place in the global food
    security architecture, the role and nature of commitments
    under a convention, and the role of the Food Aid Committee.
    The committee agreed to establish a working group as a basis
    for continuing dialogue in order to make the convention a
    more effective instrument.  (However, it remains unsettled
    whether this would be accomplished through negotiation or
    amending the current convention. No decision has been reach
    to renegotiate the current convention.) The working group
    will begin its work by March 15 and will finalize its written
    report covering the major components of a convention by May
    ¶14.  Members will again meet in London April 15-16 to
    facilitate the process to improve the convention.  The
    working group will report back to the Food Aid Committee in
    June.  The European Commission continues to exert significant
    pressure on the process arguing that the EC may vote against
    extending the 1999 Convention at the June meetings unless
    clear progress is being made, i.e., members can signal a
    willingness to formally renegotiate the Convention.  While
    demonstrating a clear willingness to continue this
    exploratory process, other members including the United
    States continue to insist that they will not agree to
    negotiations unless and until there is a shared vision for a
    new and decidedly better convention. END SUMMARY.

    ¶2. (U) At an extraordinary meeting of the Food Aid Committee,
    members discussed in detail their respective "vision
    statements" for a food aid convention.  They began by
    discussing their vision of a convention as well as its key
    objectives.  Members broadly agreed that activities under a
    convention should broadly contribute to the macro objectives
    of reducing hunger, poverty and food insecurity.  Moreover,
    members agreed that the specific focus under the convention
    should relate primarily to improving food access and food
    consumption by vulnerable groups.  In that regard, members
    agreed that the focus on improving access to food would
    complement other necessary efforts to improve overall food
    availability in food insecure countries, especially those
    based on the food security statement issued at the  L'Aquila
    Summit in July 2009.  Members further agreed that the
    Convention should help them ensure that appropriate,
    effective, and nutritious food is available in response to
    the food needs of vulnerable populations that arise in
    natural disasters and in other food crisis situations.
    Members also shared the view that FAC could play an important
    role in helping members receive adequate credit for the
    resources that they provide to meet food needs.

    ¶3. (U) Several members, led by the EC, argued in favor of
    broadening the tool kit available under the convention from
    food aid to food assistance (including not only food
    commodities but also non-food mechanisms such as cash and
    vouchers, and livelihood supports).  However, Japan and
    Switzerland argued in favor of a narrower focus on food aid.
    In addition, Members agreed that all food aid/assistance
    provided should be linked to needs and that the provision of
    food aid/assistance under a convention should be informed by
    a set of guiding principles such as "do no harm."  Finally,
    members agreed that there was a shared view that members
    should engage more actively on coordination, cooperation and
    information sharing in the future, especially when food
    crises occur or are imminent.  That said, no clear "shared
    vision" of the rationale for a new convention emerged from
    the lengthy discussions other than the need to ensure that
    commitments reflect what members should do and are doing in
    response to situations in which vulnerable groups require
    food.

    ¶4. (U) In terms of where the convention (and its committee)
    fits into the global food security architecture, members
    value the committee as a donor's forum, independent of
    implementing agencies such as the World Food Program, that
    has important technical expertise.  Members agreed that it
    would be important to establish a link between the
    discussions in the FAC and other food security and
    humanitarian fora to avoid duplicating efforts.  Rather, they

    STATE 00016421  002.2 OF 003

    would wish to exploit the potential expertise of the FAC
    donor forum with a special focus on food access in
    humanitarian, transitional and fragile contexts.  The U.S.
    reiterated that the Convention is the only legally binding
    treaty governing the provision of food aid to the world's
    needy and that it ensures a predictable minimum level of food
    aid is available annually to help respond to natural and
    man-made emergencies and other needs-based food requirements.
     Members further agreed that other bodies are not
    sufficiently aware of the work undertaken by the FAC and that
    the FAC must do a better job integrating itself into the
    global food security architecture while remaining
    independent.

    ¶5. (U) Members struggled to find common ground with respect
    to the role and the nature of commitments, a core component
    of any convention, although there was agreement that resource
    commitments should be linked to needs to the extent
    practicable. The U.S. noted that commitments have
    historically been a means of collective burden-sharing and
    expressed an interest in discussing commitment approaches
    that would be more relevant to situations in which the food
    needs exceeded the ability of any individual member to
    respond. (Note: the U.S. used the example of the looming food
    needs of Niger and Chad to make this point.)  However, the
    focus of much of the discussion was more narrowly on
    individual member commitments.  Members mostly agreed on the
    shortcomings of the current FAC structure, particularly its
    narrow "tonnage of food" focus (although the U.S. has pointed
    out that expressing commitments in tonnage rather than
    monetary value provides some predictability by insulating
    these commitments from price volatility).  Members also
    agreed on the problem that the current commitments structure
    did not link commitments to need.  However, no common view
    emerged about the type of commitment that a new convention
    might contain or the legal standing of that commitment
    regime.

    ¶6. (U) COMMENT: Members clearly need to develop a shared
    vision on FAC commitments concerning their type, content and
    status (legally binding or political) if they are to move
    ahead to negotiate a new convention.  END COMMENT.

    ¶7. (U) Members expressed a willingness to explore the
    possibility of a flexible commitment structure in which all
    members would not have to make commitments in the same
    fashion, but could allow them the option to commit in tonnage
    terms, monetary terms, or in some other value.  Members,
    however, were unsure what such a hybrid approach would mean
    in practice.  Several donors, including the U.S. and Canada,
    suggested that it would be useful to have independent
    consultants consider the pros and cons of different types of
    commitment regimes.

    ¶8. (U) Members all agreed that the Food Aid Committee is not
    now living up to the pro-active role envisioned under the
    current convention.  However, they also agreed that the role
    of the committee depends ultimately on the content and the
    structure of a new Convention, making it difficult to discuss
    this issue in detail at this point.  Currently, members see
    three main roles for the committee: exchange of best
    practices/lessons learned-type information related to the
    provision of food aid/food assistance; ongoing provision of
    information through the FAC member website on situations
    requiring (or likely to require) food  aid/assistance and on
    responses made in those situations; and possible
    extraordinary meetings in response to particular on-going
    emergencies to facilitate discussion and coordination between
    donors and to highlight situations of developing crises.

    ¶9. (U) NEXT STEPS.  The Food Aid Committee agreed to
    establish a working group in order to continue work to make
    the convention a more effective instrument.  The working
    group will begin its work by March 15 and will finalize its
    written report on the major components of a convention by May
    ¶14.  The EC has promised to circulate to members on March 15
    a draft of elements of key articles (such as objectives and
    commitments) of a new convention.  Other members are expected
    to respond to this draft with suggestions of their own.  The
    report will be put forward without any prejudice to a
    position members may adopt in any formal negotiation of the
    Convention.  Members will meet again in London April 15-16 to
    facilitate the process.  The report of the working group will
    be discussed at the informal meeting of members June 2 and 3
    and then considered at the formal session of the Food Aid
    Committee on June 4.   On the basis of this report, the
    Committee will decide how to proceed and, if necessary,

    STATE 00016421  003.2 OF 003

    revise the terms of reference of the working group.

    ¶10. (U) The European Commission continues to exert
    significant pressure on the process.  As in December, it
    again made clear that it may vote against extending the 1999
    Convention at the June meetings unless clear progress is
    being made, i.e., members can signal a willingness to
    renegotiate the Convention.  (Unless members all agree to
    extend it at the June 4 formal meeting of the Food Aid
    Committee, the 1999 Convention is set to expire July 1.)
    However, the EC signaled it is now willing to accept
    something short of a specific start date for a formal
    renegotiation.  The Commission believes it can satisfy EU
    member states with a clear indication from FAC members that
    they are starting internal bureaucratic and/or legal
    processes towards either reconfiguring or formally
    renegotiating the FAC.  While the U.S. demonstrated a clear
    willingness to continue this exploratory process, like other
    members it continues to insist that they will not agree to
    negotiations unless and until there is a shared vision for a
    new and decidedly better convention.  Japan is particularly
    reluctant to agree to negotiations at this time.  The U.S.
    delegation again made clear that it will seek guidance from
    its senior leadership about whether to embark on negotiations
    and the guiding principles for a new convention if the
    leadership gives the green light only after a clear vision
    for a new convention emerges.
    CLINTON

`