Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 12522 / 251,287

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
2011/05/01 2011/05/02 2011/05/03 2011/05/04 2011/05/05 2011/05/06 2011/05/07 2011/05/08 2011/05/09 2011/05/10

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 96 97 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03 1985/06
1986/05
1987/06
1988/01
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
1991/05
1992/01 1992/06 1992/12
1993/10
1996/11
1997/12
2000/05 2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/06 2001/07 2001/09 2001/10 2001/11
2002/01 2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/07 2002/08 2002/09 2002/11
2003/01 2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown Consulate Fukuoka
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guayaquil Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia Embassy Niamey Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples Consulate Naha
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito Consulate Quebec
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sapporo Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AMED AF ASEC AMGT AFIN AG ABLD AJ AL ASUP AR AID AORC AS AE APER ACOA ANET AU ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG ARF APECO AEMR ATRN AA AADP ACS AM AZ APCS AFFAIRS ADANA ADPM ADCO AECL ACAO AY APEC AORG ASEAN ABUD AGAO AINF AFSI AFSN AGR AROC AO AODE AMBASSADOR ACABQ AGMT AORL AX AMEX ADM ASIG AFGHANISTAN ASCH AMCHAMS ACBAQ AIT AND ARM AQ ATFN AC AUC ASEX AER AVERY AGRICULTURE AMG AFU AN ALOW
BR BA BL BTIO BH BEXP BO BE BG BU BK BRUSSELS BD BM BT BC BX BIDEN BY BBSR BB BF BP BN BILAT BTIU BWC BMGT
CS CO CASC CA CU CH CN CONS CBW CI CE CVIS CW CLINTON CG COE CMGT CJAN CR CWC CD CPAS CT CONDOLEEZZA COUNTER CDG CIDA CM CICTE COUNTRY CJUS CY CBSA CEUDA CLMT CAC CODEL CBE CHR CTM CDC CSW CFED CARICOM CB CL COM CIS CKGR CROS CIC CAPC COPUOS CTR CVR CF CIA COUNTERTERRORISM CITEL CLEARANCE CACS CAN CITT CARSON CACM CDB CV CBC CNARC
DHS DAO DCM DR DOD DOMESTIC DO DA DK DTRA DJ DEA DISENGAGEMENT DE DPRK DEPT DOE DS DEFENSE DEAX
ES EC ECON EFIN EAID ETRD EAGR ENRG EINV EIND ETTC ECIN EG ELTN EPET ELAB EU ECPS EUREM ET EWWT ELN EAIR EUN EFIS ER EINT ENVR EMIN ENERG ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS ELECTIONS EFTA EZ EN ECA EPA ENGR ETRC EXTERNAL ENNP EI ENVI ETRO ETRN EK ENIV EINVEFIN ECINECONCS ERD EUR EURN EDU EAIG ECONCS ENGY ECONOMICS ETRDEINVTINTCS ETC EFINECONCS EEPET EXIM EAP ECONOMY ESA EINN ECONOMIC EIAR EXBS ECUN EINDETRD EREL EUC ESENV ECONEFIN ECIP EFIM EAIDS ETRDECONWTOCS EUNCH EINVETC EINVECONSENVCSJA EUMEM ETRA ERNG
FR FBI FI FAC FARC FDA FAO FJ FTA FTAA FREEDOM FISO FOR FOREIGN FAS FM FOI FINR FINANCE FMLN FO
GG GM GV GT GOV GTMO GANGS GH GOI GL GA GY GAERC GR GF GCC GAZA GZ GERARD GE GTIP GLOBAL
HO HK HILLARY HA HR HU HUMAN HURI HSTC HI HYMPSK HUMOR HEBRON
IR IN IS IZ IT IC IAEA IEFIN ICAO IACI ID IRS INTELSAT IO ILC ITU IMO IRAQI IV ILO ITALY IBRD ICRC IPR ISRAELI IIP INMARSAT IAHRC IWC INTERNAL ICTY ITRA INDO ITPHUM ITPGOV ITALIAN IQ IBET INR ICJ INRB IRC IMF IA INTERPOL IDA ISLAMISTS IEA IL IZPREL IRAJ ITF IF ISRAEL ICTR IDP IGAD INRA INRO
JO JA JUS JM JP JOSEPH JAMES JOHN JOHNNIE
KNNP KTFN KFLU KPAO KMDR KWBG KTER KBCT KPAL KDEM KTIA KOLY KJUS KCRM KV KSUM KWMN KS KRVC KGHG KE KGIC KPRP KTIP KUNR KPKO KRIM KSCA KOMC KHLS KCOR KWAC KISL KZ KG KIRF KMPI KVPR KIPR KOMS KSPR KN KIRC KFRD KCIP KAWC KFIN KCRCM KR KBTS KSEP KFLO KSEO KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KSTC KICC KMCA KHDP KSAF KACT KSTH KOCI KNUP KPRV KTDB KMIG KIDE KU KPAONZ KNUC KNNPMNUC KNPP KERG KSCI KBIO KDRG KGIT KCFE KTLA KTEX KPLS KHIV KCSY KTRD KID KSAC KNAR KMRS KBTR KJUST KREC KLIG KCOM KAID KPWR KDEMAF KCRS KWMM KRCM KRAD KAWK KNEI KTBT KCFC KPAI KFSC KOM KMOC KICA KRGY KO KVIR KX KPOA KCHG KVRP KGCC KREL KMFO KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KFTFN KNSD KHUM KSEC KCMR KPIN KESS KDEV KCGC KWWMN KPAK KWNM KWMNCS KRFD KDDG KIFR KHSA
LY LE LG LI LH LTTE LU LO LA LAB LOG LT LABOR
MOPS MARR MCAP MEPN MNUC MO MASS MX MD MZ MRCRE MI MTCRE MAS MU MR MC MY MTCR MAPP MUCN MIL ML MEDIA MA MPOS MP MERCOSUR MG MK MEETINGS MCC MASC MV MIK MW MT MDC MOPPS MTS MLS MILI MAR MTRE MEPI MQADHAFI MAPS MARAD MEPP MILITARY MASSMNUC
NATO NZ NSF NPG NSG NA NL NU NPT NSFO NS NSC NE NO NK NI NSSP NATIONAL NDP NP NASA NPA NAFTA NG NIPP NEW NZUS NR NRR NH NGO NC NT NAR NV NORAD NATOPREL NW
OTRA OIIP OPRC OREP OVIP ODIP OPDC OPAD OAS OVP OSCE OIE OECD OPCW OEXC OCS OPIC OFDP OSCI OMIG OBSP OFDA OHUM OTR OFFICIALS OSAC ON OCII OES OIC
PGOV PREL PINR PINS PM PO PHUM PK PTER PREF PARM PBTS PE PAS POL PHSA PNAT PL PAK PA PSI POLITICS PROP PAIGH POLITICAL PARTIES POSTS PMIL POV PALESTINIAN PARMS PROG PU PBIO PTBS POLICY PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PG PY PTERE PHUMBA POGOV PNR PRL PINL PRGOV PORG PUNE PDOV PCI PP PS PGOF PGOVLO PF PAO PREO PAHO PREFA PKFK PSOE PEPR PPA PINT PMAR PRELP PSEPC PGOVE PINF PNG PGOC PFOR PCUL PLN POLINT PGGV PHALANAGE PARTY PHUS PDEM PECON PROV PHUMPREL PGIV PRAM PHUH PSA PHUMPGOV PEL
QA
RU RS RP RSO RICE REACTION REPORT RO RW RIGHTS RCMP ROOD RM RUPREL RFE RF REGION RSP RIGHTSPOLMIL ROBERT RELATIONS
SY SMIG SNAR SENV SCUL SW SA SOCI SO SP SN SU SR SH SYR SZ SCRS SC SF SHI SL SENVKGHG SYRIA SI SWE SARS STEINBERG SG SNARN SEVN SHUM SPCE SIPDIS SAN SNARCS SAARC SIPRS ST SNARIZ SSA SK SPCVIS SOFA SANC SEN
TR TRGY TBIO TPHY TSPA TP TW TU TSPL TS TT TX TZ TI TN TF TERRORISM TD TK TH TIP TC TO TFIN TNGD THPY TL TV TINT TRSY TURKEY TBID TAGS
UK UZ UP US UN UNMIK USTR UNCSD UNHRC UNGA USUN UNSC UNCHR UNESCO UNDC USNC UNO UY UG USEU UV UNEP USPS USAID UNHCR UNAUS UNDP UNC UE UNPUOS USOAS UNVIE UAE UNFICYP UNODC UNCHS UNIDROIT UNDESCO UNCHC UNCND UNICEF
VE VZ VT VTIZ VTEG VTPREL VM VI VN VAT VC
WBG WTRO WHO WIPO WTO WHTI WS WTRQ WI WZ WWARD WHA WITH WFP WMD WB WMO WEU WA
XL XM XW XF XG XT XK XTAG XS XB XE XR XA XZ XY XX XV XU XH XD XI XC XQ
YM YI YE YMCS
ZI ZP ZR ZO ZL ZF ZB ZU ZJ ZEALAND ZK ZANU ZN ZA ZOELLICK

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 09PANAMA519, PRIMARY PANAMA CANAL CONTRACT TO BE AWARDED

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PANAMA519.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
09PANAMA519 | 2009-06-30 17:05 | 2011-04-07 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Panama
Appears in these articles: http://www.padigital.com.pa/periodico/edicion-actual/wikileaks-panama-interna.php?story_id=1027140&codeth=1593

`

    VZCZCXYZ0025
    OO RUEHWEB

    DE RUEHZP #0519/01 1811705
    ZNY CCCCC ZZH
    O 301705Z JUN 09
    FM AMEMBASSY PANAMA
    TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3538
    INFO RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID IMMEDIATE 0334
    RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN IMMEDIATE 0019
    RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL IMMEDIATE
    RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RULSDMK/DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUMIAAA/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL IMMEDIATE

` `

    C O N F I D E N T I A L PANAMA 000519

    SIPDIS

    DEPT OF COMMERCE - MATTHEW GAISFORD
    DEPT OF TREASURY - SARA SENICH

    E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/29/2019
    TAGS: ECON EINV ETRD MARR PM EWWT
    SUBJECT: PRIMARY PANAMA CANAL CONTRACT TO BE AWARDED

    REF: 2009 PANAMA 195

    Classified By: Ambassador Stephenson for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

    -------
    SUMMARY
    -------

    1) (C) The public ceremony to announce a winner for the
    Panama Canal's $3.35 billion third set of locks contract is
    expected to be July 9. Three competing consortia submitted
    bids and are led by the following firms: 1) Bechtel
    (American), 2) ACS (Spanish), and 3) Sacyr (Spanish).
    Reportedly, both Bechtel and ACS submitted technically
    compliant bids priced over $4 billion; however, there are
    doubts about Sacyr's technical and financial compliance.
    Unfortunately, there is no clear standard for minimal
    technical compliance and how a technically non-compliant bid
    would be disqualified. Sacyr's price reportedly is lower
    than $4 billion and price weighs heavily in the determination
    of the winner. Additionally, Sacyr's bid is reportedly
    supported by government export credit agencies reinsuring
    their bonding syndicate, which is against the spirit of the
    Panama Canal Authority's (ACP) public efforts to not involve
    sovereign guarantees (the inclusion of which masks a
    consortium's financial well-being and provides a financial
    bidding advantage). Post will continue to monitor the
    process, to advocate for Bechtel, and to promote U.S. based
    content.

    ------------------------------
    A WINNER WILL SOON BE DECLARED
    (IF THE BID IS RIGHT)
    ---------------------

    ¶2. (SBU) The public ceremony to announce a winner for the
    Panama Canal's third set of locks contract is expected to be
    held between July 2 and July 14, according to private
    statements made by representatives of the ACP and Canal
    Expansion Project Advisor CH2MHill to Embassy and consortia
    staff. July 9 is the most commonly reported date. As
    explained in reftel, the financial portion of the bids will
    be opened and scored during a ceremony. The financial score
    (45% of the total points) will then be combined with the
    technical score (55% of the total points), which is currently
    being calculated by a team of experts. The winner will then
    be instantaneously and publicly announced. However, if the
    winner's financial bid is higher than the ACP's price cap
    (which will be revealed moments before the consortia's
    financial bids are opened), the winner will be asked to lower
    their price to within the price cap. If the winner does not
    accept the price cap price, then the ACP will allow all
    consortia, who submitted technically and financially
    compliant bids, to resubmit price proposals. These new price
    proposals would then be combined with already determined
    technical proposals and a new winner would be declared. If
    the price is still too high, the ACP can raise its price
    ceiling (which would need approval by the National Assembly)
    or void the entire bidding process.

    --------------------------
    COMPETITORS AND THEIR BIDS
    --------------------------

    ¶3. (C) Three consortia submitted bids and are led by the
    following firms: 1) Bechtel (American), 2) ACS (Spanish), and
    3) Sacyr (Spanish). According to a representative from the
    Canal Expansion Project Advisor (American firm CH2MHill),
    each consortium submitted differing bids. Bechtel reportedly
    produced the "Rolls Royce" set of locks, which exceeded ACP
    requirements, including for throughput. (As laid out in the
    public bid documents, a consortium does not receive extra
    points for exceeding requirements.) ACS reportedly more
    closely followed the ACP's requirements. Sacyr, according to
    CH2MHill, submitted a technical proposal, which may not be
    minimally acceptable. Due to the publicly available criteria
    for scoring the technical proposals and assuming initial
    reports are accurate, it is anticipated that Bechtel and ACS
    will receive roughly the same technical score. Sacyr, if
    they are found technically compliant/viable, would score only
    slightly lower. Thus, if the technical scores are close,
    price will be the determining factor in the formula to
    determine the winner.

    ¶4. (C) Reports of the prices attached to the bids roughly
    track the quality. According to consortia members, both
    Bechtel and ACS have bids that "start with a 4" - meaning
    over $4 billion. Sacyr, via consortium member Impregilo,
    leaked to the press the price of $3.7 billion on April 21 and
    stated that they have the lowest price. Depending on the
    accuracy of the leaked price data, Sacyr's financial score
    could be significantly better than Bechtel's and ACS's.
    (Leaking the bid price is a breach of the bidding rules.
    Impregilo recently broke the bidding rules again by declaring
    that the Sacyr-led consortium has the highest technical
    score. Absent a breach in ACP security, this information was
    unknowable at the time of the statements. ACS and Bechtel
    have both written strong protest letters to the ACP.) Post's
    Senior Commercial Officer reports that during an unrelated
    meeting, a senior ACP official accidentally stated the ACP
    price ceiling is $3.62 billion.

    -------------------------
    SACYR - POTENTIAL SPOILER
    -------------------------

    ¶5. (C) When combined the financial and technical components
    of the bid are combined in 45% and 55% proportions
    respectively, the Sacyr bid could win this "best value"
    competition. A Sacyr win could be disconcerting. Sacyr is
    considered bankrupt and is being propped up by the Spanish
    government. Therefore, besides possibly having a design that
    is not workable, a Sacyr wins adds financial risk to the
    locks construction. The bid process has protections against
    non-compliant bids, if the ACP chooses to activate the
    protections. If a bid is technically non-compliant (and the
    ACP has not detailed the exact parameters of a technically
    non-compliant bid), the ACP has the option to not even open
    the price envelope. Bechtel representatives told the
    Ambassador on June 24 that they prefer this path. If a bid
    is financially non-compliant, the ACP possibly can reject the
    offer. A bid would be financially non-compliant if a
    consortium failed a financial health audit, which will be
    conducted on the winner. All consortia were determined by
    the ACP to be financially healthy as of November 15, 2007
    during the pre-qualification phase. Based upon previous
    decisions to keep all consortia in the process, the ACP is
    not expected to disqualify any consortium.

    --------------------------------
    SACYR - RECEIVING STATE SUPPORT?
    --------------------------------

    ¶6. (C) Based upon reports from representatives from competing
    consortia, Sacyr's $50 million performance bond is backed by
    the government export credit agencies of Spain
    (CESCE-Secretaria de Estado de Comercio), France
    (COFACE-Compagnie Francaise D'Assurance Pour le Commerce
    Extereur), and Italy (SACE-Servize Assicurativi del Commercio
    Estero). Sacyr gained a competitive advantage by securing
    the near equivalent of a sovereign guarantee apparently at no
    additional cost and no additional scrutiny of their books
    (vice Bechtel and ACS who had to purchase the bond on the
    open market and subjected their firms to some level of
    financial evaluation). This arrangement goes against ACP
    Administrator Aleman's publicly expressed desire not to have
    sovereign guarantees, because the performance bond ideally
    should serve as a surrogate for a consortium's financial
    health. If a consortium could not provide the $50 million
    performance bond, then the consortium was probably not
    financially healthy. If Sacyr wins, litigation from Bechtel
    or ACS is likely. For ACS, there is the added dimension of
    why the Spanish government is helping one Spanish consortium
    and not the other. It should be noted, however, that the ACP
    has not prohibited use of export credit agencies in the
    bidding process.

    -------
    COMMENT
    -------

    ¶7. (SBU) In essence, the ACP created a transparent process
    and now - due to rigid adherence to that process - may choose
    a consortium that provides the "best value," on paper, but
    may not be capable of completing the project. It appears
    that the ACP wished to retain flexibility by not clearly
    demarcating the floor of technical non-compliance and not
    deviating from its rules to ask Sacyr for a comprehensive
    audit before the bids are open. (We understand that Sacyr may
    have provided year-to-date 2009 financial data that, due to
    the limited time window of that data, could continue to mask
    Sacyr's true financial condition.) Post will continue to
    monitor the bidding process closely to ensure fairness. Post
    maintains frequent communication with Bechtel representatives
    in order to coordinate actions to assure Bechtel is not
    unfairly disadvantaged.
    STEPHENSON

`