Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 12477 / 251,287

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
2011/05/01 2011/05/02 2011/05/03 2011/05/04 2011/05/05 2011/05/06 2011/05/07 2011/05/08

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 96 97 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03 1985/06
1986/05
1987/06
1988/01
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
1991/05
1992/01 1992/06 1992/12
1993/10
1996/11
1997/12
2000/05 2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/06 2001/07 2001/09 2001/10 2001/11
2002/01 2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/07 2002/08 2002/09 2002/11
2003/01 2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown Consulate Fukuoka
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guayaquil Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia Embassy Niamey Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples Consulate Naha
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito Consulate Quebec
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sapporo Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ASEC AF AFIN AM AJ AG AS AEMR AMGT AORC APER AU ACBAQ AFGHANISTAN AR AE ADANA ADPM APECO AMED AX AL ADCO AA AECL AADP AMEX ACAO ANET AODE ASCH AY APEC AID AORG ASEAN ABUD AGAO AFSI AFSN AINF AGR AROC AO AFFAIRS ASIG ABLD ASUP AND ARM AQ ATFN AC ATRN ACOA AMBASSADOR AUC ASEX ARF AER AVERY AGRICULTURE AMG AFU AN AORL ALOW APCS AZ AMCHAMS ADM ACABQ AGMT ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AIT ACS
BR BK BA BRUSSELS BEXP BM BD BL BO BILAT BU BN BT BX BTIO BIDEN BG BE BP BY BBSR BC BTIU BWC BB BF BH BMGT
CO CASC CS CA CONDOLEEZZA CE CVIS CU CPAS CMGT COUNTER CH COUNTRY CJAN CG CIDA CJUS CI CY CD CDG CBSA CEUDA CR CM CLMT CAC CBW CODEL COPUOS CIC CW CBE CHR CFED CT CONS CWC CTM CDC CVR CF CIA CLINTON COUNTERTERRORISM CITEL CLEARANCE COE CN CACS CAN CB CSW CITT CARSON CACM CDB COM CV CAPC CKGR CBC CTR CNARC CROS CARICOM CL CICTE CIS
DR DHS DA DJ DEA DPRK DEPT DOMESTIC DOE DS DE DEFENSE DO DAO DCM DEAX DK DTRA DISENGAGEMENT DOD
EINV ETRD ECON EPET ENRG EAGR EC EFIN EAID ELTN EIND ELAB EAIR ECIN EUN EG EU ETTC ET EI EWWT EFIS EMIN ER EPA ENVI ENGR ETRC EXTERNAL ECPS EN ELN EINT ETRDEINVTINTCS ES EZ ETRO ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EDU ETRN EFTA EAIG EK EUREM ECONCS ECONOMICS ENVR ELECTIONS EAP ENIV ECONOMY ESA EINN ECONOMIC EIAR EXBS ECA ECUN EINDETRD EUR EREL EUC ESENV ECONEFIN ECIP ENERG EFIM EAIDS ETRDECONWTOCS EUNCH EINVETC ENGY EINVECONSENVCSJA EUMEM ETRA EINVEFIN ETC ERD ENNP EFINECONCS ECINECONCS ERNG EXIM EURN EEPET
FR FREEDOM FTA FJ FARC FI FTAA FAC FBI FOREIGN FOI FM FAO FAS FINR FDA FOR FINANCE FMLN FO FISO
GTMO GG GM GV GOV GOI GL GH GA GY GT GAERC GR GF GCC GE GZ GTIP GLOBAL GANGS GERARD GAZA
HO HA HR HUMAN HK HU HILLARY HI HSTC HURI HYMPSK HUMOR HEBRON
IR IAEA IS IZ IN IT IO IAHRC ID IC IRAQI IWC ISLAMISTS IV ICAO INDO ITPHUM ITPGOV ITALIAN IPR ICRC INTERPOL IQ IBET IMO INR INTERNAL ICJ ICTY IRS ILO ISRAELI IEA INRB ITALY IL ITU ITRA IBRD IIP ILC IZPREL IMF IRAJ IA ITF IF INMARSAT ISRAEL ICTR IDP IGAD IEFIN IACI INRA INRO INTELSAT IRC IDA
JA JO JUS JP JOSEPH JM JAMES JOHNNIE JOHN
KS KN KTFN KTDB KTIP KIRF KPAO KDEM KCOR KE KMPI KSCA KZ KG KNUP KNNP KPAL KCRM KIPR KPKO KFLO KSEP KOMC KISL KNNPMNUC KWBG KFRD KUNR KWMN KSTC KFLU KOLY KMDR KJUS KSTH KAWC KU KWAC KNPP KERG KSEO KACT KHLS KGHG KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KDRG KTIA KVPR KV KIDE KICC KPRP KBIO KSUM KGIT KCFE KBTS KCIP KGIC KPAI KTLA KTEX KFSC KPLS KHIV KCSY KSAC KTRD KID KMRS KOM KSAF KRVC KR KMOC KNAR KHDP KSPR KBTR KOCI KJUST KNEI KAWK KGCC KMCA KBCT KREL KMFO KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KFTFN KVRP KIRC KCOM KO KLIG KAID KNSD KHUM KSEC KRAD KCMR KPWR KCHG KICA KPIN KESS KDEV KCGC KWWMN KPRV KPAK KWNM KWMNCS KRFD KVIR KSCI KDDG KIFR KHSA KCRS KRGY KCRCM KFIN KPOA KCFC KTER KREC KMIG KTBT KRCM KRIM KWMM KOMS KX KPAONZ KNUC KDEMAF
LE LY LG LH LI LTTE LAB LOG LA LT LO LU LABOR
MP MY MOPS MCAP MARR MNUC MUCN MTCRE MASS MAPP MIL MX MEDIA MO MPOS MU ML MA MERCOSUR MG MD MW MK MAS MT MI MOPPS MASC MR MTS MLS MILI MAR MTRE MEPN MTCR MEPI MQADHAFI MAPS MARAD MEETINGS MEPP MILITARY MZ MDC MC MCC MASSMNUC MRCRE MV MIK
NU NZ NATO NPT NL NI NAFTA NDP NIPP NP NG NRR NO NEW NE NH NR NA NS NSF NZUS NATIONAL NSG NC NT NAR NK NV NORAD NSSP NASA NATOPREL NPA NW NPG NSFO NGO NSC
OVIP OPIC OEXC OTRA OPDC OREP OAS OPRC OIIP OSCE OFFICIALS OMIG ODIP OFDP OECD OBSP OPCW OTR OSAC OSCI ON OCII OES OPAD OIC OFDA OHUM OVP OIE OCS
PGOV PINR PREL PHSA PTER PE PREF PHUM PK PARM PINS PM PL PO PA PBTS PBIO POL PARMS PROG PAK POLITICS PORG PTBS PNAT PUNE POLICY PDOV PCI PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PP PS PG PY PTERE PGOF PALESTINIAN PKFK PSOE PEPR PPA PINT PMAR PRELP PSEPC PREFA PGOVE PINF PNG PMIL PGOC PFOR PCUL PLN PROP POLINT PGGV PHALANAGE PARTY PGOVLO PHUS PDEM PECON PROV PAS PHUMPREL PGIV PRAM PHUH PAO PSA PHUMPGOV PF PRL PHUMBA PEL PREO PAHO POGOV POV PNR PSI PINL PU PRGOV PAIGH POLITICAL PARTIES POSTS
QA
RS RCMP RICE RU REACTION REPORT REGION RIGHTS RO RW RF RM RFE RSP RP RIGHTSPOLMIL ROBERT RELATIONS ROOD RUPREL RSO
SOCI SN SY SNAR SENV SP SZ SCUL SA SO SW SMIG SU SENVKGHG SR SYRIA SF SI SC SWE SARS STEINBERG SG SIPRS ST SL SNARIZ SSA SK SPCVIS SOFA SEVN SIPDIS SAN SYR SHUM SANC SEN SPCE SNARCS SNARN SHI SH SAARC SCRS
TU TPHY TI TX TSPL TRGY TBIO TF TERRORISM TH TIP TC TSPA TW TZ TNGD TT TL TV TS TRSY TINT TN TURKEY TBID TD TP TAGS TK TR TFIN TO THPY
UK UNSC USTR UG UNGA UZ USEU US UN UNC USUN UP UY UNESCO USPS UNHRC UNO UNHCR UNCHR USAID UNVIE UAE UNMIK USOAS UNFICYP UV UNEP UNODC UNCHS UNIDROIT UNDESCO UNCHC UNDP UNAUS UNCND UNCSD UNICEF UNPUOS UNDC USNC UE
VT VZ VE VTEG VTPREL VM VI VTIZ VAT VC VN
WS WTO WTRO WTRQ WI WZ WHO WFP WWARD WHA WB WBG WIPO WITH WMO WEU WMD WHTI WA
XA XF XM XL XW XV XR XB XU XH XG XE XK XX XD XI XT XS XC XY XZ XTAG XQ
YE YM YI YMCS
ZI ZO ZU ZEALAND ZK ZR ZF ZP ZN ZA ZB ZOELLICK ZL ZANU ZJ

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 10STATE16421, MEETING OF THE FOOD AID COMMITTEE, FEBRUARY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10STATE16421.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
10STATE16421 | 2010-02-23 16:47 | 2011-05-02 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Secretary of State

`

    VZCZCXRO1125
    PP RUEHIK
    DE RUEHC #6421/01 0541650
    ZNR UUUUU ZZH
    P 231647Z FEB 10
    FM SECSTATE WASHDC
    TO EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
    RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN PRIORITY 7493
    RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 6542
    RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 0207
    RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1508
    RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 2415
    RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY

` `

    UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STATE 016421

    SIPDIS

    E.O. 12958: N/A
    TAGS: EAID EC ETRD
    SUBJECT: MEETING OF THE FOOD AID COMMITTEE, FEBRUARY
    15-16, 2010

    REF: STATE 130895

    STATE 00016421  001.2 OF 003

    ¶1. (U) SUMMARY.  The Food Aid Committee held an
    "extraordinary meeting" in London February 15-16 to continue
    discussions on the future of the 1999 Food Aid Convention.
    Members discussed their vision of a convention as well as its
    key objectives, the convention's place in the global food
    security architecture, the role and nature of commitments
    under a convention, and the role of the Food Aid Committee.
    The committee agreed to establish a working group as a basis
    for continuing dialogue in order to make the convention a
    more effective instrument.  (However, it remains unsettled
    whether this would be accomplished through negotiation or
    amending the current convention. No decision has been reach
    to renegotiate the current convention.) The working group
    will begin its work by March 15 and will finalize its written
    report covering the major components of a convention by May
    ¶14.  Members will again meet in London April 15-16 to
    facilitate the process to improve the convention.  The
    working group will report back to the Food Aid Committee in
    June.  The European Commission continues to exert significant
    pressure on the process arguing that the EC may vote against
    extending the 1999 Convention at the June meetings unless
    clear progress is being made, i.e., members can signal a
    willingness to formally renegotiate the Convention.  While
    demonstrating a clear willingness to continue this
    exploratory process, other members including the United
    States continue to insist that they will not agree to
    negotiations unless and until there is a shared vision for a
    new and decidedly better convention. END SUMMARY.

    ¶2. (U) At an extraordinary meeting of the Food Aid Committee,
    members discussed in detail their respective "vision
    statements" for a food aid convention.  They began by
    discussing their vision of a convention as well as its key
    objectives.  Members broadly agreed that activities under a
    convention should broadly contribute to the macro objectives
    of reducing hunger, poverty and food insecurity.  Moreover,
    members agreed that the specific focus under the convention
    should relate primarily to improving food access and food
    consumption by vulnerable groups.  In that regard, members
    agreed that the focus on improving access to food would
    complement other necessary efforts to improve overall food
    availability in food insecure countries, especially those
    based on the food security statement issued at the  L'Aquila
    Summit in July 2009.  Members further agreed that the
    Convention should help them ensure that appropriate,
    effective, and nutritious food is available in response to
    the food needs of vulnerable populations that arise in
    natural disasters and in other food crisis situations.
    Members also shared the view that FAC could play an important
    role in helping members receive adequate credit for the
    resources that they provide to meet food needs.

    ¶3. (U) Several members, led by the EC, argued in favor of
    broadening the tool kit available under the convention from
    food aid to food assistance (including not only food
    commodities but also non-food mechanisms such as cash and
    vouchers, and livelihood supports).  However, Japan and
    Switzerland argued in favor of a narrower focus on food aid.
    In addition, Members agreed that all food aid/assistance
    provided should be linked to needs and that the provision of
    food aid/assistance under a convention should be informed by
    a set of guiding principles such as "do no harm."  Finally,
    members agreed that there was a shared view that members
    should engage more actively on coordination, cooperation and
    information sharing in the future, especially when food
    crises occur or are imminent.  That said, no clear "shared
    vision" of the rationale for a new convention emerged from
    the lengthy discussions other than the need to ensure that
    commitments reflect what members should do and are doing in
    response to situations in which vulnerable groups require
    food.

    ¶4. (U) In terms of where the convention (and its committee)
    fits into the global food security architecture, members
    value the committee as a donor's forum, independent of
    implementing agencies such as the World Food Program, that
    has important technical expertise.  Members agreed that it
    would be important to establish a link between the
    discussions in the FAC and other food security and
    humanitarian fora to avoid duplicating efforts.  Rather, they

    STATE 00016421  002.2 OF 003

    would wish to exploit the potential expertise of the FAC
    donor forum with a special focus on food access in
    humanitarian, transitional and fragile contexts.  The U.S.
    reiterated that the Convention is the only legally binding
    treaty governing the provision of food aid to the world's
    needy and that it ensures a predictable minimum level of food
    aid is available annually to help respond to natural and
    man-made emergencies and other needs-based food requirements.
     Members further agreed that other bodies are not
    sufficiently aware of the work undertaken by the FAC and that
    the FAC must do a better job integrating itself into the
    global food security architecture while remaining
    independent.

    ¶5. (U) Members struggled to find common ground with respect
    to the role and the nature of commitments, a core component
    of any convention, although there was agreement that resource
    commitments should be linked to needs to the extent
    practicable. The U.S. noted that commitments have
    historically been a means of collective burden-sharing and
    expressed an interest in discussing commitment approaches
    that would be more relevant to situations in which the food
    needs exceeded the ability of any individual member to
    respond. (Note: the U.S. used the example of the looming food
    needs of Niger and Chad to make this point.)  However, the
    focus of much of the discussion was more narrowly on
    individual member commitments.  Members mostly agreed on the
    shortcomings of the current FAC structure, particularly its
    narrow "tonnage of food" focus (although the U.S. has pointed
    out that expressing commitments in tonnage rather than
    monetary value provides some predictability by insulating
    these commitments from price volatility).  Members also
    agreed on the problem that the current commitments structure
    did not link commitments to need.  However, no common view
    emerged about the type of commitment that a new convention
    might contain or the legal standing of that commitment
    regime.

    ¶6. (U) COMMENT: Members clearly need to develop a shared
    vision on FAC commitments concerning their type, content and
    status (legally binding or political) if they are to move
    ahead to negotiate a new convention.  END COMMENT.

    ¶7. (U) Members expressed a willingness to explore the
    possibility of a flexible commitment structure in which all
    members would not have to make commitments in the same
    fashion, but could allow them the option to commit in tonnage
    terms, monetary terms, or in some other value.  Members,
    however, were unsure what such a hybrid approach would mean
    in practice.  Several donors, including the U.S. and Canada,
    suggested that it would be useful to have independent
    consultants consider the pros and cons of different types of
    commitment regimes.

    ¶8. (U) Members all agreed that the Food Aid Committee is not
    now living up to the pro-active role envisioned under the
    current convention.  However, they also agreed that the role
    of the committee depends ultimately on the content and the
    structure of a new Convention, making it difficult to discuss
    this issue in detail at this point.  Currently, members see
    three main roles for the committee: exchange of best
    practices/lessons learned-type information related to the
    provision of food aid/food assistance; ongoing provision of
    information through the FAC member website on situations
    requiring (or likely to require) food  aid/assistance and on
    responses made in those situations; and possible
    extraordinary meetings in response to particular on-going
    emergencies to facilitate discussion and coordination between
    donors and to highlight situations of developing crises.

    ¶9. (U) NEXT STEPS.  The Food Aid Committee agreed to
    establish a working group in order to continue work to make
    the convention a more effective instrument.  The working
    group will begin its work by March 15 and will finalize its
    written report on the major components of a convention by May
    ¶14.  The EC has promised to circulate to members on March 15
    a draft of elements of key articles (such as objectives and
    commitments) of a new convention.  Other members are expected
    to respond to this draft with suggestions of their own.  The
    report will be put forward without any prejudice to a
    position members may adopt in any formal negotiation of the
    Convention.  Members will meet again in London April 15-16 to
    facilitate the process.  The report of the working group will
    be discussed at the informal meeting of members June 2 and 3
    and then considered at the formal session of the Food Aid
    Committee on June 4.   On the basis of this report, the
    Committee will decide how to proceed and, if necessary,

    STATE 00016421  003.2 OF 003

    revise the terms of reference of the working group.

    ¶10. (U) The European Commission continues to exert
    significant pressure on the process.  As in December, it
    again made clear that it may vote against extending the 1999
    Convention at the June meetings unless clear progress is
    being made, i.e., members can signal a willingness to
    renegotiate the Convention.  (Unless members all agree to
    extend it at the June 4 formal meeting of the Food Aid
    Committee, the 1999 Convention is set to expire July 1.)
    However, the EC signaled it is now willing to accept
    something short of a specific start date for a formal
    renegotiation.  The Commission believes it can satisfy EU
    member states with a clear indication from FAC members that
    they are starting internal bureaucratic and/or legal
    processes towards either reconfiguring or formally
    renegotiating the FAC.  While the U.S. demonstrated a clear
    willingness to continue this exploratory process, like other
    members it continues to insist that they will not agree to
    negotiations unless and until there is a shared vision for a
    new and decidedly better convention.  Japan is particularly
    reluctant to agree to negotiations at this time.  The U.S.
    delegation again made clear that it will seek guidance from
    its senior leadership about whether to embark on negotiations
    and the guiding principles for a new convention if the
    leadership gives the green light only after a clear vision
    for a new convention emerges.
    CLINTON

`