Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 12453 / 251,287

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
2011/05/01 2011/05/02 2011/05/03 2011/05/04 2011/05/05

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 96 97 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03 1985/06
1986/05
1987/06
1988/01
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
1991/05
1992/01 1992/06 1992/12
1993/10
1996/11
1997/12
2000/05 2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/06 2001/07 2001/09 2001/10 2001/11
2002/01 2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/07 2002/08 2002/09 2002/11
2003/01 2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guayaquil Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia Embassy Niamey Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples Consulate Naha
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito Consulate Quebec
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ASEC AORC AMGT APER AU AF AS ACBAQ AFGHANISTAN AFIN AR AE AJ ADANA AEMR AG ATRN ADPM APECO AGAO AMED AX AM AL ADCO AA AECL AADP ABUD AMEX ACAO ANET AODE ASCH AY APEC AID AORG ASEAN AFSI AFSN AINF AGR AROC AO AMBASSADOR AFFAIRS ASIG ABLD ASUP AND ARM ARF AQ ATFN AC ACOA AORL ADM AUC AGMT ACABQ ASEX AFU ALOW AZ APCS AVERY ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AER AN AIT AMG AGRICULTURE AMCHAMS ACS
BR BA BD BL BO BF BU BILAT BEXP BRUSSELS BK BN BM BT BY BX BTIO BIDEN BG BE BP BBSR BC BTIU BWC BB BH BMGT
CH CY CA CU CS CO CVIS CPAS CMGT CE COUNTER CASC COUNTRY CJAN COUNTERTERRORISM CG CI CD CIDA CJUS CDG CBSA CEUDA CR CM CLMT CAC CBW CODEL COPUOS CWC CIC CW CBE CHR CFED CT CONS CIA CTM CDC CVR CF CLINTON CITEL CLEARANCE COE CN CACS CAN CONDOLEEZZA CB CSW CITT CARSON CNARC CACM CDB CARICOM COM CROS CAPC CTR CV CKGR CBC CL CICTE CIS
DR DHS DA DJ DEA DPRK DEPT DOMESTIC DEAX DOE DS DAO DCM DO DE DK DEFENSE DTRA DISENGAGEMENT DOD
ECON EFIN ELAB ETRD EIND EC EINV EAGR ENRG ETTC EAID EPET ELTN EWWT EAIR EFIS EMIN EG EU ER EUN EPA ENVI EXTERNAL ECPS ENGR ETRC ECIN EN EI ELN ET EINT ETRDEINVTINTCS ES ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EZ ETRO EDU ETRN EFTA EAIG EK EUREM EURN ECONCS ECONOMICS ENVR ELECTIONS EAP ENIV ECONOMY ESA EINN ECONOMIC EIAR EXBS ECA ECUN EINDETRD EUR EREL EUC ESENV ECONEFIN ECIP ENERG ENNP EFINECONCS EFIM ENGY EAIDS EINVEFIN EINVETC EUMEM ETRA ETC ERNG ETRDECONWTOCS EUNCH ECINECONCS EINVECONSENVCSJA EXIM ERD EEPET
FR FREEDOM FTA FJ FARC FI FTAA FAC FBI FOREIGN FOI FDA FM FAO FAS FINR FOR FINANCE FMLN FO FISO
GM GV GOI GOV GL GAERC GH GT GG GA GY GR GF GCC GE GZ GTIP GERARD GLOBAL GANGS GAZA GTMO
HA HR HUMAN HO HK HU HILLARY HUMOR HI HSTC HURI HYMPSK HEBRON
IR IS IZ IAEA IO IAHRC ID IC IT IRAQI IWC IN IL ISLAMISTS IV ICAO INDO ITPHUM ITPGOV ITALIAN IPR ICRC INTERPOL IQ IBET IMO INR ITRA INTERNAL ICJ ICTY IRS ILO INRA INRO ISRAELI IEA INRB ITALY ITU IBRD IIP ILC INTELSAT IZPREL IMF INMARSAT IRAJ IDA ICTR IA IGAD IF IDP ITF ISRAEL IEFIN IRC IACI
JA JUS JO JP JOSEPH JM JAMES JOHNNIE JOHN
KN KCRM KOMC KNNPMNUC KIPR KPAL KWBG KSCA KFRD KNNP KUNR KTIP KWMN KSTC KFLU KOLY KISL KPAO KMDR KJUS KSTH KDEM KCOR KIRF KAWC KU KTFN KWAC KNPP KERG KSEO KACT KHLS KZ KGHG KTIA KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KCRCM KE KPKO KCIP KDRG KVPR KV KIDE KICC KPRP KBIO KSUM KGIT KCFE KG KBTS KFLO KMPI KS KGIC KPAI KHSA KTLA KSEP KTEX KFSC KOCI KHDP KPLS KTDB KHIV KCSY KSAC KTRD KID KMRS KOM KSAF KRVC KR KMOC KNAR KIRC KBCT KSPR KFIN KBTR KJUST KNEI KAWK KGCC KMCA KREL KMFO KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KFTFN KVRP KCOM KO KLIG KAID KVIR KNSD KHUM KSEC KRAD KPRV KCMR KPWR KCHG KIFR KCFC KICA KPIN KSCI KESS KDEV KTBT KCRS KCGC KOMS KRIM KTER KREC KPOA KWWMN KRGY KPAK KWNM KMIG KDDG KRFD KWMM KWMNCS KX KRCM KPAONZ KNUC KDEMAF KNUP
LY LE LO LG LH LI LTTE LAB LOG LA LT LU LABOR
MARR MOPS MASS MCAP MTCRE MNUC MIL MX MEDIA MO MPOS MU ML MA MP MY MERCOSUR MG MD MW MK MAS MEETINGS MR MT MI MOPPS MASC MTS MLS MILI MAR MTRE MEPN MAPP MTCR MEPI MQADHAFI MAPS MARAD MASSMNUC MEPP MCC MZ MILITARY MDC MRCRE MC MV MIK MUCN
NATO NL NZ NPT NI NAFTA NU NDP NIPP NP NPA NG NRR NO NSC NEW NE NH NR NA NS NSF NZUS NATIONAL NSG NC NT NAR NK NGO NV NSFO NSSP NASA NW NPG NORAD NATOPREL
OTRA OAS OPRC OIIP OVIP OREP OPDC OEXC OSCE OFFICIALS OMIG ODIP OFDP OECD OPIC OBSP OPCW OFDA OTR OSAC OSCI ON OCII OES OVP OIC OPAD OIE OHUM OCS
PREL PGOV PK PHUM PINS PARM PA PTER PINR PREF PHSA PBTS PBIO PO POL PE PARMS PM PROG PL PAK POLITICS PORG PTBS PNAT PUNE POLICY PDOV PCI PROP PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PP PS PAO PG PY PTERE PGOF PALESTINIAN PKFK PSOE PEPR PPA PINT PMAR PRELP PSEPC PREFA PGOVE PINF PHUMPGOV PNG PMIL PGOC PFOR PCUL PLN PSA PGIV POLINT PAS POGOV PHUMPREL PHUMBA PEL PGGV PNR PHALANAGE PARTY PGOVLO PRAM PHUS PDEM PECON PF POV PROV PRL PREO PAHO PHUH PSI PINL PU PRGOV PAIGH POLITICAL PARTIES POSTS
QA
RS RU REACTION REPORT REGION RIGHTS RO RW RCMP RF RM RFE RSP RP RICE ROBERT ROOD RELATIONS RIGHTSPOLMIL RUPREL RSO
SU SNAR SO SOCI SW SENV SMIG SCUL SP SZ SENVKGHG SR SY SA SYRIA SF SI SC SWE SARS STEINBERG SN SG SIPRS ST SEVN SL SPCE SNARIZ SSA SNARCS SYR SK SPCVIS SHUM SIPDIS SHI SH SOFA SEN SNARN SAARC SAN SANC SCRS
TRGY TBIO TU TF TERRORISM TI TSPL TPHY TH TIP TSPA TC TO TW TX TZ TNGD TT TL TV TFIN TS TRSY TINT TN TURKEY TBID TD TK TR THPY TP TAGS
UNGA UN UK US UNC UNSC USUN UG UP UY USEU UNESCO USPS USTR UZ UNHRC UNO UNMIK UNAUS UNHCR UNCHR USAID UNVIE UAE USOAS UNFICYP UV UNEP UNODC UNCHS UNIDROIT UNDESCO UNDC UNCHC UNDP UNCND USNC UNPUOS UNICEF UNCSD UE
VT VE VTPREL VM VZ VI VTIZ VAT VN VC VTEG
WS WTO WTRO WTRQ WI WZ WHO WFP WBG WITH WWARD WHA WB WIPO WA WMO WMD WHTI WEU
XA XF XM XL XW XV XR XB XU XY XH XG XE XK XX XD XI XS XT XTAG XQ XZ XC
YE YM YI YMCS
ZI ZO ZU ZEALAND ZK ZR ZF ZP ZN ZA ZB ZOELLICK ZL ZJ ZANU

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 06OTTAWA2439, CRUNCH TIME COMING FOR SOFTWOOD LUMBER AGREEMENT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06OTTAWA2439.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
06OTTAWA2439 | 2006-08-15 17:05 | 2011-04-28 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa

`

    VZCZCXRO0940
    OO RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
    DE RUEHOT #2439/01 2271748
    ZNR UUUUU ZZH
    O 151748Z AUG 06
    FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
    TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3474
    INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
    RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC IMMEDIATE

` `

    UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 002439

    SIPDIS

    SENSITIVE
    SIPDIS

    STATE PASS USTR FOR AMBASSADOR SCHWAB, JOHN MELLE, JIM
    MENDENHALL, AND SAGE CHANDLER
    STATE FOR WHA/CAN
    USDOC/ITA/IA/JTERPSTRA

    E.O. 12958: N/A
    TAGS: EAGR ECON ETRD CA
    SUBJECT: CRUNCH TIME COMING FOR SOFTWOOD LUMBER AGREEMENT

    REF: OTTAWA 2321

    ¶1. (SBU) Summary:  In his vigorous efforts to garner industry
    support for the July 1 softwood lumber agreement,
    International Trade Minister Emerson and other senior
    Ministers met with top Canadian lumber officials in Toronto
    on August 9 to hear their concerns about several of the
    deal's provisions, but he warned that the agreement would not
    be re-negotiated.  While Emerson was publicly optimistic
    after the meeting that there would be significant Canadian
    industry support for the deal, he sought to put pressure on
    the industry to "fish or cut bait" by setting August 21 as
    the deadline for announcing its support.  If sufficient
    support is not forthcoming, the Minister indicated that the
    deal would not go forward to get Cabinet approval for
    Parliamentary action in September, thus killing the
    agreement.  Thus, this week is probably crunch time for the
    future of the July 1 softwood lumber agreement.

    ¶2. (SBU)  Because of their dominant position in Canadian
    lumber, the reaction of the British Columbia companies will
    be key in determining whether Emerson gets the significant
    industry support he needs to recommend the agreement to Prime
    Minister Harper and to Parliament.  The areas of industrial
    concern are pretty clear, but it is still uncertain whether
    these can be addressed satisfactorily (or fudged up) in the
    "clarifications" that Emerson is now discussing with the
    industry, the provinces, and USTR.  Despite the industry's
    discontent, the Embassy believes that Emerson, with the Prime
    Minister's strong support, is adamant that the industry must
    choose between the July 1 agreement as written and a
    continuation of trade conflict, uncertainty and litigation.

    ¶3. (SBU):  Comment: The engagement, in the middle of the
    summer Parliamentary recess, of the senior ministries in last
    week's Toronto talks underscores the importance of the
    softwood lumber issue for the Harper government.  While
    resolving the dispute is not on the government's formal list
    of objectives, contacts have noted to us that it is crucial
    both to improving Canada-U.S. relations and to demonstrating
    the Harper team's ability to marshal business support behind
    a major trade policy initiative.  End comment and summary.

    Toronto Meeting with the Industry
    ---------------------------------

    ¶4. (U)  On August 9, International Trade Minister David
    Emerson, Industry Minister Maxime Bernier, and Finance
    Minister Jim Flaherty met in Toronto for two hours with
    almost two dozen Canadian lumber executives to discuss
    industry concerns regarding the U.S.-Canadian softwood lumber
    agreement that was concluded by Emerson and USTR Susan Schwab
    on July 1.  After the meeting, Emerson told the press that he
    was "optimistic" that Ottawa would get "significant" industry
    support for the agreement by August 21, the date he said he
    would decide whether to recommend to the Prime Minister and
    Cabinet that the deal should be submitted to Parliament for
    its approval after the end of the summer recess on September
    ¶18.  Emerson warned that he would not move the deal forward
    without significant industry support.  The Minister described
    the Toronto meeting as constructive, adding that he would
    continue to meet with the industry, the provinces as well as
    USTR in coming days to "clarify" wording and definitions in
    the July 1 agreement in an effort to address industry
    concerns, but he remarked pointedly that the agreement would
    Qconcerns, but he remarked pointedly that the agreement would
    not be opened for re-negotiation as some called for.

    August 21 Deadline and Next Parliamentary Hearing
    --------------------------------------------- ----

    ¶5. (SBU)  We understand that Minister Emerson's August 21
    deadline was dictated by the amount of time the GOC needs to
    draft the legislation to implement the export tax component
    of the agreement in time for Parliament's review in late
    September.  A senior advisor in the Prime Minister's office
    opined that another reason for the date is that it's time for
    the industry "to fish or cut bait."  Perhaps coincidentally,
    August 21 is also the date of the final hearing of the House
    of Commons Standing Committee on International Trade that is
    reviewing the July 1 agreement.  At an earlier hearing on
    July 31, Emerson stressed that "negotiations have ended,"
    that if the July 1 agreement is rejected, there is no chance
    that another one can be renegotiated for at least three
    years, and that a fresh round of the litigation cycle would
    be "ugly."  Expected witnesses at next Monday's hearing
    include the CEO of Domtar; senior officials from Canfor and

    OTTAWA 00002439  002 OF 003

    Weyerhaeuser; the Presidents of the British Columbia (BC)
    Lumber Trade Council; the Ontario Lumber Manufacturers'
    Association, and the Quebec Forest Products Council; and
    attorney Elliot Feldman.  The hearing would be an opportunity
    for major industry players to present their definitive views
    on the July 1 agreement.

    ¶6. (SBU)  In recent days, the Embassy and the Consulates have
    discussed Emerson's August 9 announcement with government and
    industry contacts.  Policy advisors in the Prime Minister's
    office expect Harper to continue to support Minister
    Emerson's refusal to re-open the July 1 agreement to
    amendment, despite industry dissatisfaction with some of its
    provisions.   However, key contacts at industry associations
    were split on whether the GOC will or will not receive
    sufficient industry support in coming days to go forward with
    implementing the agreement.

    Optimists Versus Pessimists
    ---------------------------

    ¶7. (SBU)  The "optimistic" view of industry observers is:
    "The deal is absolutely essential not just for the industry,
    but for Canada-U.S. relations and in order to demonstrate
    that this government has the ability to complete an
    international treaty.  It won't be easy and there will be
    lots of acrimony, but the stakes are high enough that many
    parties will sign on to work the backrooms, persuade the
    companies, and ensure that the Parliamentary vote on the
    agreement is based on national interests rather than on party
    lines."  On the other hand, the "pessimistic" view believes:
    "It will only take one company to scuttle this deal and there
    are several that can do it.  Some of those firms have an
    interest in dragging out the dispute so that they can pick up
    distressed assets from their failed competitors.  This
    industry has repeatedly shown that it just cannot speak with
    one voice - the regional and business diversity is just too
    great for that to be possible."  There also seems to be a
    split on the agreement depending on company size.  Large
    companies with interests in both the U.S. and Canada (e,g.,
    Weyerhaeuser and Canfor) favor the agreement whereas some
    smaller Canadian only companies do not.

    The View From Quebec
    --------------------

    ¶8. (SBU)  In an August 14 conversation with our Consul
    General in Quebec City, Guy Chevrette, President of the
    Quebec Forest Industry Council, commented on the state of
    play:

    -- the Quebec lumber industry believes that it could reach an
    agreement with the U.S. without much difficulty, but that the
    BC industry is the real problem.
    -- What Quebec is looking for is "souplesse" or flexibility
    in three areas: 1) "circumvention" - the existing agreement
    says that any changes to the "forest industry regime" under
    the agreement are an infraction.  In Chevrette's view, this
    is an overly broad provision as there are some changes that
    Quebec may need to execute that would have nothing to do with
    softwood lumber, and such adjustments should not be seen as
    an "infraction" of the July 1 agreement.  He cited as an
    example that the GOQ will need to address how it handles poor
    quality lumber within the province.  The Quebec industry does
    not want needed changes in the province to be held hostage to
    the softwood lumber agreement.
    2) interpretive annexes - the Quebec industry feels that
    adding interpretive annexes would give it the flexibility it
    needs to sign off on the agreement.  3) the Quebec industry
    Qneeds to sign off on the agreement.  3) the Quebec industry
    wants a mechanism that would extend the 23 month limit of the
    agreement for some additional months.  For example, if one
    side wanted to withdraw from the agreement, then it would
    give that party 2-3 months to announce who would be members
    of its delegation that would discuss the intention to
    withdraw; then a few more months to file an intention to
    withdraw; and so forth.  The idea would be to draw out the
    disengagement process by several months: "giving up a billion
    dollars is a lot for an agreement that only lasts 23 months."

    ¶9. (SBU)  Chevrette thought that BC in fact doesn't want an
    agreement at all.  They've got their pine beetle infestation
    disease ravaging their wood, so they would prefer not to have
    an agreement, and to flood the U.S. market with their
    softwood instead.  The Quebec industry will meet on August 18
    to come to agreement on its position.

    OTTAWA 00002439  003 OF 003

    Ontario
    -------

    ¶10. (SBU)  According to Consulate General Toronto soundings,
    the language on running rules - prospective versus
    retrospective - and monthly quotas are problematic in the
    July 1 agreement.   Ontario's lumber producers are quite
    concerned about the agreement's provision to divide Canada's
    export quota into monthly allotments.  Under the present
    agreement text, if companies do not fulfill their share of
    the monthly quota, the unused quota is lost and cannot be
    carried forward.  An Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
    official said that province's industry would prefer a rolling
    quota over three months, for example, so that any lost
    production in a given month could be made up in subsequent
    months.

    ¶11. (SBU)  While many contacts have either been silent about
    what happened at the August 9 meeting or have been
    unreachable, the Vice President at Abitibi said that
    Emerson's meeting was "very productive, honest, and open."
    Ontario Premier McGuinty told the Ambassador on August 14
    that the BC industry's position will be key to determining
    the Canadian industry's support of the July 1 agreement.

    The Prairies
    ------------

    ¶12. (SBU)  There has been little reaction to Emerson's
    meeting from industry leaders in Manitoba, Alberta, and
    Saskatchewan.  The lumber industry in these provinces is an
    important sector, but relatively small in the big picture.
    In the past, these observers have said that they have no
    choice but to "go with the flow" and support the positions of
    the bigger players in BC, Ontario and Quebec.  However, a
    Conservative Alberta MP had a different take on the current
    situation.  He told the DCM that he heard that the lumber
    industry in his province favored the status quo of endless
    litigation over the July 1 agreement.

    British Columbia
    ----------------

    ¶13. (SBU)  A key Consulate Vancouver contact was pessimistic
    about the outcome of the Emerson meeting.  The industry in
    the west is not on board with the July 1 agreement and
    believes that the GOC is maneuvering the BC companies to kill
    the deal and then have them take the blame.  This outcome
    would also avoid the deal becoming the subject of a
    Parliamentary vote of confidence in the fall, which could
    force a new election if the Conservatives lost.  The BC
    industry was told that their list of demands for
    modifications in the July 1 agreement was too long and should
    be shortened.  At the August 9 meeting with Emerson, the BC
    industry said it wanted: 1) a 12 month standstill; 2) running
    rules (i.e., the border tax calculation on the date a lumber
    order is placed versus when it actually crosses the border)
    should be prospective rather than retrospective; 3) border
    tax adjustments should be reviewed quarterly rather than
    monthly; and 4) BC's coastal logging should not be subject to
    a duty (in concert with the rest of the province).

    Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
    http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa

    WILKINS

`