Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 12404 / 251,287

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
2011/05/01 2011/05/02 2011/05/03 2011/05/04

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 96 97 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03 1985/06
1986/05
1987/06
1988/01
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
1991/05
1992/01 1992/06 1992/12
1993/10
1996/11
1997/12
2000/05 2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/06 2001/07 2001/09 2001/10 2001/11
2002/01 2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/07 2002/08 2002/09 2002/11
2003/01 2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guayaquil Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples Consulate Naha
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito Consulate Quebec
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ASEC AE AF AM AR AJ AU AORC AG AEMR AMGT APER AGMT AL AFIN AO AMED ADCO AS ABUD ABLD ASUP ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG APECO AID AND AMBASSADOR AN ARM AY AODE AMG ASCH AMCHAMS ARF APCS APEC ASEAN AGAO ANET ADPM ACOA ACABQ AORL AFFAIRS ATRN ACS AFSI AFSN ADANA ASIG AA AX AUC AC AECL AADP AGRICULTURE AMEX ACAO ACBAQ AQ AORG ADM AINF AIT ASEX AGR AROC ATFN AFGHANISTAN AFU AER ALOW AZ AVERY
BA BY BU BR BE BL BO BK BM BILAT BH BEXP BF BTIO BC BBSR BMGT BTIU BG BWC BB BD BX BP BRUSSELS BN BIDEN BT
CW CH CF CD CV CVIS CM CE CA CJAN CLINTON CIA CU CASC CI CO CACM CDB CN CMGT CS CG CBW CIS CR CONDOLEEZZA CPAS CAN CWC CY COUNTER CDG CL CT CIC CIDA CSW CHR CB CODEL COUNTERTERRORISM CTR COM CICTE CFED CJUS CKGR CBSA CEUDA CARSON CONS CITEL CLMT CROS CITT CAC CVR CDC CAPC COPUOS CBC CBE CARICOM COE COUNTRY CLEARANCE CACS CTM CNARC
DA DR DPRK DJ DEA DEPT DTRA DISENGAGEMENT DOD DEFENSE DOMESTIC DHS DAO DCM DO DE DEAX DOE DK DS
ECON EFIN ETRD EUN EFIS EG ETTC EZ EPET EAID EAGR ENRG ECUN EU ELAB ECPS EAIR EINV ELTN EWWT EIND EMIN EI ECIN ENVR ELECTIONS EINVEFIN EN ES ER EC EUC EINT EINVETC ENGR ET EK ENIV ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS ECONOMY EAP EFTA EUR EUMEM EXIM ERD ENERG EUREM ESA ERNG EXTERNAL EPA EINVECONSENVCSJA ECONOMICS ELN EINN EFINECONCS ENNP EEPET ETRDEINVTINTCS ENVI ETRO ESENV ECINECONCS ECONOMIC EAIDS EDU ETRA ETRN EFIM EIAR ETRC EAIG EXBS EURN ECIP EREL ECA ENGY ECONCS ECONEFIN ETC ETRDECONWTOCS EUNCH EINDETRD
FR FJ FI FREEDOM FTAA FARC FAO FINANCE FOR FO FDA FAC FM FTA FISO FMLN FBI FOREIGN FOI FAS FINR
GM GE GG GA GZ GV GH GT GR GY GAERC GOI GAZA GOV GTMO GL GLOBAL GTIP GCC GANGS GERARD GF
HO HURI HA HILLARY HR HU HUMOR HK HUMAN HSTC HEBRON HI HYMPSK
IR IZ IS IAEA INRB IRAJ IQ IN IT IMO INTERPOL ICAO IO IC ITALY ITALIAN IRAQI ICTY ID IPR IWC ILC INTELSAT IL IBRD IMF IA IRC ICRC ILO ITU ITRA IV IDA IAHRC ICJ ISRAELI IRS INMARSAT ISRAEL ISLAMISTS INDO IZPREL ITPHUM ITPGOV ITF IBET IEFIN INR IACI INTERNAL IDP IGAD IEA ICTR IIP INRA INRO IF
JO JA JAMES JM JP JOSEPH JOHNNIE JOHN JUS
KJUS KSCA KNNP KU KCOR KCRM KDEM KTFN KHLS KPAL KWBG KACT KGHG KPAO KTIA KIRF KWMN KS KG KZ KN KMDR KISL KSPR KHIV KPRP KAWK KR KUNR KDRG KCIP KGCC KTIP KSUM KPKO KVIR KAWC KPIN KGIC KRAD KIPR KOLY KCFE KMCA KE KV KICC KNPP KBCT KSEP KFRD KFLU KVPR KOCI KBIO KSTH KMPI KCRS KOMC KTBT KPLS KIRC KREL KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KFLO KBTS KSTC KTDB KFSC KX KFTFN KNEI KIDE KREC KMRS KICA KPAONZ KCGC KSAF KRGY KCMR KRVC KVRP KSEO KCOM KAID KTEX KNUC KNAR KNUP KNNPMNUC KLIG KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KCRCM KHDP KGIT KNSD KOMS KWMM KPAI KHSA KTLA KO KMFO KRCM KCSY KSAC KTRD KPWR KID KWNM KRIM KPOA KCHG KOM KSCI KFIN KMOC KESS KWAC KMIG KSEC KIFR KDEMAF KPRV KBTR KERG KTER KDDG KPAK KRFD KHUM KDEV KCFC KWWMN KWMNCS KJUST
LE LY LG LU LH LI LO LOG LAB LTTE LA LABOR LT
MARR MOPS MU MTCRE MNUC MY MASS MCAP MOPPS MAR MPOS MO ML MR MASC MX MD MP MA MTRE MIL MCC MZ MK MDC MRCRE MAPS MV MI MEPN MAPP MEETINGS MAS MTS MLS MILI MTCR MG MC MARAD MIK MILITARY MEDIA MEPI MUCN MEPP MT MERCOSUR MW MASSMNUC MQADHAFI
NZ NATO NG NI NO NATIONAL NU NPT NIPP NL NPG NS NA NGO NP NSG NDP NAFTA NR NC NH NE NSF NPA NK NSSP NRR NATOPREL NSC NT NW NORAD NEW NV NSFO NAR NASA NZUS
OTRA OVIP OPRC OPDC OSCE OAS ODIP OIIP OFDP OVP OREP OFFICIALS OSAC OEXC OPCW OIE OIC OFDA OSCI OPIC OBSP OECD ON OCII OHUM OES OCS OMIG OPAD OTR
PGOV PREL PHUM PINR PTER PSOE PINS PARM PK PBTS PEPR PM POLITICAL PARTIES PREF PBIO PROP PA PSI PINT PO PKFK PL PAK PE POLITICS PINL POL PHSA PU PF POV PFOR PHALANAGE PARTY PARMS PRGOV PNAT POLINT PRAM PMAR PG PAO PROG PRELP PPA PCUL PSEPC PSA PREO PAHO PGIV PREFA PALESTINIAN PAIGH POSTS PTBS PGOVLO PORG PGOVE PLN PINF PAS PUNE POLICY PDEM PDOV PCI PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PHUMPGOV PMIL PNG PP PS PHUH PECON POGOV PY PHUMPREL PHUS PRL PGOC PNR PGGV PROV PTERE PGOF PHUMBA PEL
QA
RS RU RW REGION RP RICE ROBERT RSP RUPREL RM RO RCMP RSO RELATIONS REACTION REPORT RIGHTS ROOD RF RFE RIGHTSPOLMIL
SP SA SY SF SYR SENV SCUL SOCI SNAR SO SU SG STEINBERG SHUM SW SMIG SR SZ SIPRS SI SAARC SPCE SARS SN SYRIA SANC SL SCRS SC SENVKGHG SAN SNARCS SHI SWE SNARIZ SIPDIS SEN SNARN SPCVIS SEVN SSA SH SOFA SK ST
TPHY TU TRGY TI TX TS TW TC TFIN TD TSPA TH TT TIP TBIO TSPL TZ TERRORISM TRSY TN THPY TINT TF TL TV TK TO TP TURKEY TNGD TBID TAGS TR
UP US UNSC UK UZ UE UNESCO UV UNGA UN UNMIK UNO UY UAE UNEP UG UNHCR UNHRC USUN UNAUS USTR USNC USOAS UNCHR UNCSD UNDP USEU USPS UNDC UNDESCO UNCHC UNFICYP UNC UNODC UNPUOS UNCND UNICEF UNCHS UNVIE USAID UNIDROIT
VE VZ VN VT VTPREL VM VTIZ VTEG VI VAT VC
WTO WMO WI WTRQ WHO WWARD WA WB WBG WITH WTRO WHA WMD WIPO WS WZ WHTI WFP WEU
XF XA XL XM XR XS XT XK XY XC XG XW XD XV XX XB XE XZ XH XTAG XQ XU XI
YM YI YE YMCS
ZI ZP ZR ZF ZANU ZOELLICK ZU ZO ZB ZL ZK ZEALAND ZN ZA ZJ

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 10STATE16421, MEETING OF THE FOOD AID COMMITTEE, FEBRUARY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10STATE16421.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
10STATE16421 | 2010-02-23 16:04 | 2011-05-02 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Secretary of State

`

    VZCZCXRO1125
    PP RUEHIK
    DE RUEHC #6421/01 0541650
    ZNR UUUUU ZZH
    P 231647Z FEB 10
    FM SECSTATE WASHDC
    TO EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
    RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN PRIORITY 7493
    RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 6542
    RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 0207
    RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1508
    RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 2415
    RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY

` `

    UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STATE 016421

    SIPDIS

    E.O. 12958: N/A
    TAGS: EAID EC ETRD
    SUBJECT: MEETING OF THE FOOD AID COMMITTEE, FEBRUARY
    15-16, 2010

    REF: STATE 130895

    STATE 00016421  001.2 OF 003

    ¶1. (U) SUMMARY.  The Food Aid Committee held an
    "extraordinary meeting" in London February 15-16 to continue
    discussions on the future of the 1999 Food Aid Convention.
    Members discussed their vision of a convention as well as its
    key objectives, the convention's place in the global food
    security architecture, the role and nature of commitments
    under a convention, and the role of the Food Aid Committee.
    The committee agreed to establish a working group as a basis
    for continuing dialogue in order to make the convention a
    more effective instrument.  (However, it remains unsettled
    whether this would be accomplished through negotiation or
    amending the current convention. No decision has been reach
    to renegotiate the current convention.) The working group
    will begin its work by March 15 and will finalize its written
    report covering the major components of a convention by May
    ¶14.  Members will again meet in London April 15-16 to
    facilitate the process to improve the convention.  The
    working group will report back to the Food Aid Committee in
    June.  The European Commission continues to exert significant
    pressure on the process arguing that the EC may vote against
    extending the 1999 Convention at the June meetings unless
    clear progress is being made, i.e., members can signal a
    willingness to formally renegotiate the Convention.  While
    demonstrating a clear willingness to continue this
    exploratory process, other members including the United
    States continue to insist that they will not agree to
    negotiations unless and until there is a shared vision for a
    new and decidedly better convention. END SUMMARY.

    ¶2. (U) At an extraordinary meeting of the Food Aid Committee,
    members discussed in detail their respective "vision
    statements" for a food aid convention.  They began by
    discussing their vision of a convention as well as its key
    objectives.  Members broadly agreed that activities under a
    convention should broadly contribute to the macro objectives
    of reducing hunger, poverty and food insecurity.  Moreover,
    members agreed that the specific focus under the convention
    should relate primarily to improving food access and food
    consumption by vulnerable groups.  In that regard, members
    agreed that the focus on improving access to food would
    complement other necessary efforts to improve overall food
    availability in food insecure countries, especially those
    based on the food security statement issued at the  L'Aquila
    Summit in July 2009.  Members further agreed that the
    Convention should help them ensure that appropriate,
    effective, and nutritious food is available in response to
    the food needs of vulnerable populations that arise in
    natural disasters and in other food crisis situations.
    Members also shared the view that FAC could play an important
    role in helping members receive adequate credit for the
    resources that they provide to meet food needs.

    ¶3. (U) Several members, led by the EC, argued in favor of
    broadening the tool kit available under the convention from
    food aid to food assistance (including not only food
    commodities but also non-food mechanisms such as cash and
    vouchers, and livelihood supports).  However, Japan and
    Switzerland argued in favor of a narrower focus on food aid.
    In addition, Members agreed that all food aid/assistance
    provided should be linked to needs and that the provision of
    food aid/assistance under a convention should be informed by
    a set of guiding principles such as "do no harm."  Finally,
    members agreed that there was a shared view that members
    should engage more actively on coordination, cooperation and
    information sharing in the future, especially when food
    crises occur or are imminent.  That said, no clear "shared
    vision" of the rationale for a new convention emerged from
    the lengthy discussions other than the need to ensure that
    commitments reflect what members should do and are doing in
    response to situations in which vulnerable groups require
    food.

    ¶4. (U) In terms of where the convention (and its committee)
    fits into the global food security architecture, members
    value the committee as a donor's forum, independent of
    implementing agencies such as the World Food Program, that
    has important technical expertise.  Members agreed that it
    would be important to establish a link between the
    discussions in the FAC and other food security and
    humanitarian fora to avoid duplicating efforts.  Rather, they

    STATE 00016421  002.2 OF 003

    would wish to exploit the potential expertise of the FAC
    donor forum with a special focus on food access in
    humanitarian, transitional and fragile contexts.  The U.S.
    reiterated that the Convention is the only legally binding
    treaty governing the provision of food aid to the world's
    needy and that it ensures a predictable minimum level of food
    aid is available annually to help respond to natural and
    man-made emergencies and other needs-based food requirements.
     Members further agreed that other bodies are not
    sufficiently aware of the work undertaken by the FAC and that
    the FAC must do a better job integrating itself into the
    global food security architecture while remaining
    independent.

    ¶5. (U) Members struggled to find common ground with respect
    to the role and the nature of commitments, a core component
    of any convention, although there was agreement that resource
    commitments should be linked to needs to the extent
    practicable. The U.S. noted that commitments have
    historically been a means of collective burden-sharing and
    expressed an interest in discussing commitment approaches
    that would be more relevant to situations in which the food
    needs exceeded the ability of any individual member to
    respond. (Note: the U.S. used the example of the looming food
    needs of Niger and Chad to make this point.)  However, the
    focus of much of the discussion was more narrowly on
    individual member commitments.  Members mostly agreed on the
    shortcomings of the current FAC structure, particularly its
    narrow "tonnage of food" focus (although the U.S. has pointed
    out that expressing commitments in tonnage rather than
    monetary value provides some predictability by insulating
    these commitments from price volatility).  Members also
    agreed on the problem that the current commitments structure
    did not link commitments to need.  However, no common view
    emerged about the type of commitment that a new convention
    might contain or the legal standing of that commitment
    regime.

    ¶6. (U) COMMENT: Members clearly need to develop a shared
    vision on FAC commitments concerning their type, content and
    status (legally binding or political) if they are to move
    ahead to negotiate a new convention.  END COMMENT.

    ¶7. (U) Members expressed a willingness to explore the
    possibility of a flexible commitment structure in which all
    members would not have to make commitments in the same
    fashion, but could allow them the option to commit in tonnage
    terms, monetary terms, or in some other value.  Members,
    however, were unsure what such a hybrid approach would mean
    in practice.  Several donors, including the U.S. and Canada,
    suggested that it would be useful to have independent
    consultants consider the pros and cons of different types of
    commitment regimes.

    ¶8. (U) Members all agreed that the Food Aid Committee is not
    now living up to the pro-active role envisioned under the
    current convention.  However, they also agreed that the role
    of the committee depends ultimately on the content and the
    structure of a new Convention, making it difficult to discuss
    this issue in detail at this point.  Currently, members see
    three main roles for the committee: exchange of best
    practices/lessons learned-type information related to the
    provision of food aid/food assistance; ongoing provision of
    information through the FAC member website on situations
    requiring (or likely to require) food  aid/assistance and on
    responses made in those situations; and possible
    extraordinary meetings in response to particular on-going
    emergencies to facilitate discussion and coordination between
    donors and to highlight situations of developing crises.

    ¶9. (U) NEXT STEPS.  The Food Aid Committee agreed to
    establish a working group in order to continue work to make
    the convention a more effective instrument.  The working
    group will begin its work by March 15 and will finalize its
    written report on the major components of a convention by May
    ¶14.  The EC has promised to circulate to members on March 15
    a draft of elements of key articles (such as objectives and
    commitments) of a new convention.  Other members are expected
    to respond to this draft with suggestions of their own.  The
    report will be put forward without any prejudice to a
    position members may adopt in any formal negotiation of the
    Convention.  Members will meet again in London April 15-16 to
    facilitate the process.  The report of the working group will
    be discussed at the informal meeting of members June 2 and 3
    and then considered at the formal session of the Food Aid
    Committee on June 4.   On the basis of this report, the
    Committee will decide how to proceed and, if necessary,

    STATE 00016421  003.2 OF 003

    revise the terms of reference of the working group.

    ¶10. (U) The European Commission continues to exert
    significant pressure on the process.  As in December, it
    again made clear that it may vote against extending the 1999
    Convention at the June meetings unless clear progress is
    being made, i.e., members can signal a willingness to
    renegotiate the Convention.  (Unless members all agree to
    extend it at the June 4 formal meeting of the Food Aid
    Committee, the 1999 Convention is set to expire July 1.)
    However, the EC signaled it is now willing to accept
    something short of a specific start date for a formal
    renegotiation.  The Commission believes it can satisfy EU
    member states with a clear indication from FAC members that
    they are starting internal bureaucratic and/or legal
    processes towards either reconfiguring or formally
    renegotiating the FAC.  While the U.S. demonstrated a clear
    willingness to continue this exploratory process, like other
    members it continues to insist that they will not agree to
    negotiations unless and until there is a shared vision for a
    new and decidedly better convention.  Japan is particularly
    reluctant to agree to negotiations at this time.  The U.S.
    delegation again made clear that it will seek guidance from
    its senior leadership about whether to embark on negotiations
    and the guiding principles for a new convention if the
    leadership gives the green light only after a clear vision
    for a new convention emerges.
    CLINTON

`