Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287

### Articles

Brazil Sri Lanka United Kingdom Sweden Editorial United States Latin America Egypt Yemen Jordan

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 88 89 90 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03
1986/05
1988/01
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/07 2001/10 2001/11
2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/07 2002/11 2002/12
2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Amsterdam American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamburg
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan
Embassy New Delhi Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Consulate Vladivostok
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ASEC AF AE AR AORC AJ AU AM ABLD AL AMGT ASUP AFIN APER ABUD AVERY APCS AEMR ADCO APECO ASIG AG AA AS AFFAIRS ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AMED AO ACOA AX AROC ATFN ASEAN AFGHANISTAN AFU AER ALOW AODE ATRN AID AC AGMT
BR BK BE BA BG BY BO BM BL BU BEXP BBSR BMGT BF BTIO BTIU BC BIDEN BH BRUSSELS BX BT BB BILAT
CH CO CS CE CU CLINTON CG CVIS CMGT CI CJAN CF COM CASC CA CBW CM CDG CR COUNTER CD CWC CKGR CN CPAS CJUS CV CONS CT CY COUNTERTERRORISM CIA CACM CDB CAN COE COUNTRY CLEARANCE CACS CONDOLEEZZA CARSON CL CIS CODEL CTM CB
DJ DR DA DS DOD DEAX DOE DISENGAGEMENT DEA DK DHS DTRA
ECON EFIN EAIR EUN EINV ENRG EG ETRD EPET ETTC ELAB EU ER ET EAGR ECPS ECIN ELTN EAID EMIN EWWT EFIS EIND EC ES EN EI ENVR ENGR ENIV EUNCH ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS ELN EZ EXTERNAL EINVECONSENVCSJA EINT EUR ECINECONCS ENNP EFINECONCS EK ELECTIONS ECUN EINVEFIN ECIP EINDETRD EUC EREL ECA ENERG ENGY ETRO EFTA ECONCS ECONOMICS ECONEFIN EINVETC EINN ESA ETC ETRDEINVTINTCS ESENV ETRDECONWTOCS
FR FI FJ FTAA FAO FREEDOM FBI FMLN FARC FINR
GM GG GT GH GE GV GCC GA GR GTIP GOI GZ GANGS GTMO GAZA GOV GY
HR HILLARY HO HSTC HA HU HYMPSK HK HURI HUMAN
IN IC IR IZ IS IAEA IT ICTY IO IA IWC ID ICRC ILC INTELSAT IMO ISRAELI IACI ILO ITRA IBRD IMF ICJ ICAO ITALY ITALIAN IRAQI INTERPOL IV IQ IPR INRB ITPHUM IIP IL INR ITPGOV IZPREL IRC INRA INRO IRAJ IEFIN IF
JA JO JOSEPH JM JUS JAMES JP JOHNNIE
KDEM KCRM KJUS KTIA KWBG KPAL KIPR KTIP KE KNNP KGHG KICC KV KTFN KU KCFE KDRG KWMN KSCA KGIC KCOR KFRD KPKO KSUM KPRP KPAO KBCT KIRF KCFC KISL KREC KSPR KHIV KBIO KMCA KMPI KFLU KSTH KBTR KS KOMC KOMS KSEP KPRV KFLO KHLS KN KWWMN KUNR KLIG KSTC KZ KG KRAD KOLY KTBT KTDB KOCI KAWK KCIP KNPP KWAC KMDR KAWC KIDE KSAF KX KWMNCS KNEI KCRS KVPR KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KACT KO KFSC KR KPWR KMIG KSEC KIFR KDEMAF KFIN KGCC KPIN KPLS KIRC KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KGIT KBTS KERG KWMM KRVC KNSD KVIR KNUP KTER KDDG KHSA KMRS KHDP KTLA KPAK KNAR KREL KPAI KTEX KCOM KNNPMNUC KPOA KRFD KHUM KDEV KNUC
LE LY LTTE LU LH LAB LI LG LO LOG LT
MOPS MARR MASS MNUC MO MX MCAP ML MTCRE MR MP MY MU MIL MAR MC MRCRE MTRE MA MEPI MV MPOS MD MZ MEPP MOPPS MAPP MASC MT MERCOSUR MK MDC MI MAPS MCC MASSMNUC MQADHAFI MUCN MTCR MG
NO NL NATO NT NP NI NGO NS NIPP NG NZ NA NPT NU NK NE NSF NATIONAL NSG NRR NAR NASA NPG
OREP OVIP OFDP ODIP OPDC OAS OTRA OSCE OECD OIIP OEXC OPCW OPIC OPRC OVP OSCI OTR OSAC OIC OFFICIALS OIE
PHUM PREL PGOV PREF PTER PARM PBTS PINR PINS PHSA PK POL PM PINT PE PINF PEL PA PARMS PO PLN PROP PALESTINIAN PAO PL POV PG POLITICS PEPR PSI PSOE PU POLITICAL PARTIES PBIO PECON PAK POGOV PINL PKFK PMIL PY PFOR PHALANAGE PARTY PRAM PMAR PGOVLO PUNE PORG PHUMPREL PF POLINT PHUS PGOC PNR PGGV PNAT PGOVE PRGOV PRL PROV PTERE PGOF PHUMBA
QA
RS RU RW RP RO RIGHTS RF RICE ROBERT RFE REGION
SENV SY SZ SOCI SO SR SNAR SA SP SW SMIG SU SCUL SC SAN SN SL SG SYR SEVN SF SI STEINBERG SIPRS SH SNARCS SOFA SANC SHUM SK ST
TRGY TU TBIO TH TS TSPL TT TPHY TSPA TI TK TIP TERRORISM TZ TX TW TD TP TC TO TNGD TINT TRSY TR TFIN TURKEY
UK UNGA UN UNHRC UNMIK UNO UZ UNSC UP UG UNHCR UNDC US UNAUS USTR UV UNEP UY UNESCO USUN UAE USEU UNDP UNCHS UNVIE UNCHC UE UNDESCO USAID
VE VT VZ VTPREL VN VM
WHO WZ WA WMO WTRO WEU WI WTO WTRQ WWARD WB WHA WBG
XL XF XM XA XH XK XC XR XW XY XG XT XS XZ XE XD
YI YM YMCS YE
ZJ ZF ZP ZR ZI ZU ZB ZO ZANU ZA ZOELLICK ZK

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 09MOSCOW2946, PUTIN EXUDES LEADERSHIP DURING FOUR HOUR Q AND A

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09MOSCOW2946.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
09MOSCOW2946 | 2009-12-04 15:03 | 2010-12-01 23:11 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Moscow

`

    VZCZCXRO7908
    PP RUEHDBU
    DE RUEHMO #2946/01 3381514
    ZNY CCCCC ZZH
    P 041514Z DEC 09
    FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
    TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5596
    INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE
    RUEHXD/MOSCOW POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
    RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
    RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC

` `

    C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 MOSCOW 002946

    SIPDIS

    EO 12958 DECL: 12/04/2018
    TAGS PGOV, PREL, PHUM, PINR, ECON, ETRD, KDEM, RS
    SUBJECT: PUTIN EXUDES LEADERSHIP DURING FOUR HOUR Q AND A
    SESSION

    Classified By: DCM Eric S. Rubin; reasons 1.4 (b,d).

    ¶1. (SBU) Summary: Prime Minister Vladimir Putin displayed thorough knowledge of the issues facing Russia during a live, televised question and answer session which highlighted his role as Russia’s dominant political figure. Most of the questions were focused on the economic situation and socio-economic issues (septel), but Putin also repeated his previous statements on his possible run for President in 2012, and his good relationship with President Dmitriy Medvedev. Putin also touched both sides of the coin on Stalin’s legacy, infuriating some opposition politicians and human rights activists. Putin’s confident performance in front of millions of Russians showcased his image as a practical problem-solver and the tandem leader most in touch with the
    Russian people. End Summary.

    ----------------------------
    Question and Answer Dynamics
    ----------------------------

    ¶2. (SBU) On December 3 Putin conducted a marathon, four-hour question and answer session during which he answered 80 questions from a variety of formats, including studio audience, telephone, text message, e-mail, and several live video-feeds from across the country. Putin was well prepared for the session, and his spokesman, certainly stretching the truth, stated in the days leading up to the event that Putin had read the “overwhelming majority” of the 700,000 questions received at that point. By the end of the session, Putin received over two million questions.

    ¶3. (SBU) Putin appeared comfortable with the event’s format, and demonstrated an encyclopedic knowledge of statistics in his answers. As he has done in the past, Putin stared straight at the camera, repeated the names of those asking the questions -- some of whom had met the Prime Minister in the past year -- and responded directly to their questions. In typical Putin fashion, he rarely showed any emotion and some of his attempts at dead-pan humor missed the mark. Putin took control of the event towards the conclusion by personally calling on people in the carefully screened studio audience and responding to questions he had reviewed previously. Although some of the questions were not softballs and did not appear to be scripted, Putin was informed of the general topics ahead of time and the locations for the video-feeds.

    ¶4. (SBU) Putin personally selected a controversial question about Stalin’s legacy and whether he viewed the former Soviet leader as good or bad. Putin said that Stalin had achieved some positive achievements, such as industrialization, but that the cost was unacceptable and that during Stalin’s reign mass-scale crimes were committed.

    ---------------------------------------
    Tandem Politics Show Putin Still on Top
    ---------------------------------------

    ¶5. (C) Tandem politics stood out as an important issue when people asked Putin directly about his plans to run for President in 2012 and his relationship with Medvedev. He answered with the same standard notions he has used previously, leaving vague his future plans. Putin responded that he was thinking about running in 2012, but needed to wait to see what the situation in the country would be like in a couple years. He noted that, given the country’s problems, it was better to concentrate on solving them rather than consume energy on an election campaign. Putin said he and Medvedev knew each other well, worked well together, and shared the same principles. Individual experts continue to have varying opinions on the tandem’s presidential aspirations. Longtime Kremlin insider Gleb Pavlovskiy stated that Medvedev and Putin’s vague statements about their 2012 intentions served as a way to preserve the tandem’s balance and effectiveness, however, by early 2011 their intentions, according to Pavlovskiy, would become clear.

    ¶6. (C) Putin’s excellent performance only added to his cultivated image as Russia’s dominant national leader and the one in control of the tandem. XXXXXXXXXXXX said that the event had strengthened Putin’s political leadership and demonstrated who was the country’s practical leader, and who was its theoretical leader. Experts XXXXXXXXXXXX also noted that the event showed Russians who was able to resolve concrete, socio-economic issues, such as pensions, jobs, and housing, and who worked on abstract issues less important to the populace. XXXXXXXXXXXX said that although the event was routine and scripted, it served its purpose by portraying Putin in a positive light. Pavlovskiy called it perhaps the most brilliant performance of Putin’s entire career.

    ¶7. (C) In contrast, Communist Party Deputy Chairman Ivan Melnikov told us that the show was nothing more than “psycho-therapy” for a population worried about salaries, pensions and housing, which clearly showed Putin’s interest in reclaiming the presidency. Public Chamber Member Vyacheslav Glazychev, an expert on “mono-gorod” one-industry towns in Russia, called it “a nice public relations event and nothing more.” XXXXXXXXXXXX blasted Putin’s view of Stalin. XXXXXXXXXXXX stated that the Prime Minister should have made a more straight-forward assessment of “one of the most terrible criminals in human history.”

    ¶8. (SBU) A pre-event Levada Center poll emphasized that Russians saw Putin as the country’s leader, and his “meat and potatoes” issues as more important. The poll results showed that 28 percent of respondents named Putin as the one who holds power in Russia, while 13 percent said Medvedev. Thirty-eight percent of respondents were likely to watch Putin’s address, whereas 27 percent watched Medvedev’s nationally televised address in November. Forty-three percent of respondents considered Putin’s address to be more important, compared to only 16 percent of Russians who thought Medvedev’s address was more important.

    -------
    Comment
    -------

    ¶9. (C) Putin’s guarded comments about his participation in the 2012 presidential election have helped him retain his position as the national leader and elite faction mediator. His comments on Stalin’s legacy have infuriated long-standing critics like Gozman, but are extremely unlikely to result in any major, negative backlash at Putin in Russia. At this point, Putin and Medvedev’s recent nationally televised addresses only strengthened the image of a Prime Minister who works on tangible, bread and butter issues, and a President who focuses on big-picture issues and strategic thinking. Beyrle

`