Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 6230 / 251,287

### Articles

Brazil Sri Lanka United Kingdom Sweden Editorial United States Latin America Egypt Yemen Jordan

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 88 89 90 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03
1986/05
1988/01
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/07 2001/10 2001/11
2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/07 2002/11 2002/12
2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Amsterdam American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamburg
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan
Embassy New Delhi Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Consulate Vladivostok
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ASEC AF AE AR AORC AJ AU AM ABLD AL AMGT ASUP AFIN APER ABUD AVERY APCS AEMR ADCO APECO ASIG AG AA AS AFFAIRS ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AMED AO ACOA AX AROC ATFN ASEAN AFGHANISTAN AFU AER ALOW AODE ATRN AID AC AGMT
BR BK BE BA BG BY BO BM BL BU BEXP BBSR BMGT BF BTIO BTIU BC BIDEN BH BRUSSELS BX BT BB BILAT
CH CO CS CE CU CLINTON CG CVIS CMGT CI CJAN CF COM CASC CA CBW CM CDG CR COUNTER CD CWC CKGR CN CPAS CJUS CV CONS CT CY COUNTERTERRORISM CIA CACM CDB CAN COE COUNTRY CLEARANCE CACS CONDOLEEZZA CARSON CL CIS CODEL CTM CB
DJ DR DA DS DOD DEAX DOE DISENGAGEMENT DEA DK DHS DTRA
ECON EFIN EAIR EUN EINV ENRG EG ETRD EPET ETTC ELAB EU ER ET EAGR ECPS ECIN ELTN EAID EMIN EWWT EFIS EIND EC ES EN EI ENVR ENGR ENIV EUNCH ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS ELN EZ EXTERNAL EINVECONSENVCSJA EINT EUR ECINECONCS ENNP EFINECONCS EK ELECTIONS ECUN EINVEFIN ECIP EINDETRD EUC EREL ECA ENERG ENGY ETRO EFTA ECONCS ECONOMICS ECONEFIN EINVETC EINN ESA ETC ETRDEINVTINTCS ESENV ETRDECONWTOCS
FR FI FJ FTAA FAO FREEDOM FBI FMLN FARC FINR
GM GG GT GH GE GV GCC GA GR GTIP GOI GZ GANGS GTMO GAZA GOV GY
HR HILLARY HO HSTC HA HU HYMPSK HK HURI HUMAN
IN IC IR IZ IS IAEA IT ICTY IO IA IWC ID ICRC ILC INTELSAT IMO ISRAELI IACI ILO ITRA IBRD IMF ICJ ICAO ITALY ITALIAN IRAQI INTERPOL IV IQ IPR INRB ITPHUM IIP IL INR ITPGOV IZPREL IRC INRA INRO IRAJ IEFIN IF
JA JO JOSEPH JM JUS JAMES JP JOHNNIE
KDEM KCRM KJUS KTIA KWBG KPAL KIPR KTIP KE KNNP KGHG KICC KV KTFN KU KCFE KDRG KWMN KSCA KGIC KCOR KFRD KPKO KSUM KPRP KPAO KBCT KIRF KCFC KISL KREC KSPR KHIV KBIO KMCA KMPI KFLU KSTH KBTR KS KOMC KOMS KSEP KPRV KFLO KHLS KN KWWMN KUNR KLIG KSTC KZ KG KRAD KOLY KTBT KTDB KOCI KAWK KCIP KNPP KWAC KMDR KAWC KIDE KSAF KX KWMNCS KNEI KCRS KVPR KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KACT KO KFSC KR KPWR KMIG KSEC KIFR KDEMAF KFIN KGCC KPIN KPLS KIRC KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KGIT KBTS KERG KWMM KRVC KNSD KVIR KNUP KTER KDDG KHSA KMRS KHDP KTLA KPAK KNAR KREL KPAI KTEX KCOM KNNPMNUC KPOA KRFD KHUM KDEV KNUC
LE LY LTTE LU LH LAB LI LG LO LOG LT
MOPS MARR MASS MNUC MO MX MCAP ML MTCRE MR MP MY MU MIL MAR MC MRCRE MTRE MA MEPI MV MPOS MD MZ MEPP MOPPS MAPP MASC MT MERCOSUR MK MDC MI MAPS MCC MASSMNUC MQADHAFI MUCN MTCR MG
NO NL NATO NT NP NI NGO NS NIPP NG NZ NA NPT NU NK NE NSF NATIONAL NSG NRR NAR NASA NPG
OREP OVIP OFDP ODIP OPDC OAS OTRA OSCE OECD OIIP OEXC OPCW OPIC OPRC OVP OSCI OTR OSAC OIC OFFICIALS OIE
PHUM PREL PGOV PREF PTER PARM PBTS PINR PINS PHSA PK POL PM PINT PE PINF PEL PA PARMS PO PLN PROP PALESTINIAN PAO PL POV PG POLITICS PEPR PSI PSOE PU POLITICAL PARTIES PBIO PECON PAK POGOV PINL PKFK PMIL PY PFOR PHALANAGE PARTY PRAM PMAR PGOVLO PUNE PORG PHUMPREL PF POLINT PHUS PGOC PNR PGGV PNAT PGOVE PRGOV PRL PROV PTERE PGOF PHUMBA
QA
RS RU RW RP RO RIGHTS RF RICE ROBERT RFE REGION
SENV SY SZ SOCI SO SR SNAR SA SP SW SMIG SU SCUL SC SAN SN SL SG SYR SEVN SF SI STEINBERG SIPRS SH SNARCS SOFA SANC SHUM SK ST
TRGY TU TBIO TH TS TSPL TT TPHY TSPA TI TK TIP TERRORISM TZ TX TW TD TP TC TO TNGD TINT TRSY TR TFIN TURKEY
UK UNGA UN UNHRC UNMIK UNO UZ UNSC UP UG UNHCR UNDC US UNAUS USTR UV UNEP UY UNESCO USUN UAE USEU UNDP UNCHS UNVIE UNCHC UE UNDESCO USAID
VE VT VZ VTPREL VN VM
WHO WZ WA WMO WTRO WEU WI WTO WTRQ WWARD WB WHA WBG
XL XF XM XA XH XK XC XR XW XY XG XT XS XZ XE XD
YI YM YMCS YE
ZJ ZF ZP ZR ZI ZU ZB ZO ZANU ZA ZOELLICK ZK

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 09PANAMA519, PRIMARY PANAMA CANAL CONTRACT TO BE AWARDED

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PANAMA519.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
09PANAMA519 | 2009-06-30 17:05 | 2010-12-18 12:12 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Panama

`

    VZCZCXYZ0025
    OO RUEHWEB

    DE RUEHZP #0519/01 1811705
    ZNY CCCCC ZZH
    O 301705Z JUN 09
    FM AMEMBASSY PANAMA
    TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3538
    INFO RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID IMMEDIATE 0334
    RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN IMMEDIATE 0019
    RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL IMMEDIATE
    RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RULSDMK/DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUMIAAA/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL IMMEDIATE

` `

    C O N F I D E N T I A L PANAMA 000519

    SIPDIS

    DEPT OF COMMERCE - MATTHEW GAISFORD
    DEPT OF TREASURY - SARA SENICH

    E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/29/2019
    TAGS: ECON EINV ETRD MARR PM EWWT
    SUBJECT: PRIMARY PANAMA CANAL CONTRACT TO BE AWARDED

    REF: 2009 PANAMA 195

    Classified By: Ambassador Stephenson for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

    -------
    SUMMARY
    -------

    1) (C) The public ceremony to announce a winner for the
    Panama Canal's $3.35 billion third set of locks contract is
    expected to be July 9. Three competing consortia submitted
    bids and are led by the following firms: 1) Bechtel
    (American), 2) ACS (Spanish), and 3) Sacyr (Spanish).
    Reportedly, both Bechtel and ACS submitted technically
    compliant bids priced over $4 billion; however, there are
    doubts about Sacyr's technical and financial compliance.
    Unfortunately, there is no clear standard for minimal
    technical compliance and how a technically non-compliant bid
    would be disqualified. Sacyr's price reportedly is lower
    than $4 billion and price weighs heavily in the determination
    of the winner. Additionally, Sacyr's bid is reportedly
    supported by government export credit agencies reinsuring
    their bonding syndicate, which is against the spirit of the
    Panama Canal Authority's (ACP) public efforts to not involve
    sovereign guarantees (the inclusion of which masks a
    consortium's financial well-being and provides a financial
    bidding advantage). Post will continue to monitor the
    process, to advocate for Bechtel, and to promote U.S. based
    content.

    ------------------------------
    A WINNER WILL SOON BE DECLARED
    (IF THE BID IS RIGHT)
    ---------------------

    ¶2. (SBU) The public ceremony to announce a winner for the
    Panama Canal's third set of locks contract is expected to be
    held between July 2 and July 14, according to private
    statements made by representatives of the ACP and Canal
    Expansion Project Advisor CH2MHill to Embassy and consortia
    staff. July 9 is the most commonly reported date. As
    explained in reftel, the financial portion of the bids will
    be opened and scored during a ceremony. The financial score
    (45% of the total points) will then be combined with the
    technical score (55% of the total points), which is currently
    being calculated by a team of experts. The winner will then
    be instantaneously and publicly announced. However, if the
    winner's financial bid is higher than the ACP's price cap
    (which will be revealed moments before the consortia's
    financial bids are opened), the winner will be asked to lower
    their price to within the price cap. If the winner does not
    accept the price cap price, then the ACP will allow all
    consortia, who submitted technically and financially
    compliant bids, to resubmit price proposals. These new price
    proposals would then be combined with already determined
    technical proposals and a new winner would be declared. If
    the price is still too high, the ACP can raise its price
    ceiling (which would need approval by the National Assembly)
    or void the entire bidding process.

    --------------------------
    COMPETITORS AND THEIR BIDS
    --------------------------

    ¶3. (C) Three consortia submitted bids and are led by the
    following firms: 1) Bechtel (American), 2) ACS (Spanish), and
    3) Sacyr (Spanish). According to a representative from the
    Canal Expansion Project Advisor (American firm CH2MHill),
    each consortium submitted differing bids. Bechtel reportedly
    produced the "Rolls Royce" set of locks, which exceeded ACP
    requirements, including for throughput. (As laid out in the
    public bid documents, a consortium does not receive extra
    points for exceeding requirements.) ACS reportedly more
    closely followed the ACP's requirements. Sacyr, according to
    CH2MHill, submitted a technical proposal, which may not be
    minimally acceptable. Due to the publicly available criteria
    for scoring the technical proposals and assuming initial
    reports are accurate, it is anticipated that Bechtel and ACS
    will receive roughly the same technical score. Sacyr, if
    they are found technically compliant/viable, would score only
    slightly lower. Thus, if the technical scores are close,
    price will be the determining factor in the formula to
    determine the winner.

    ¶4. (C) Reports of the prices attached to the bids roughly
    track the quality. According to consortia members, both
    Bechtel and ACS have bids that "start with a 4" - meaning
    over $4 billion. Sacyr, via consortium member Impregilo,
    leaked to the press the price of $3.7 billion on April 21 and
    stated that they have the lowest price. Depending on the
    accuracy of the leaked price data, Sacyr's financial score
    could be significantly better than Bechtel's and ACS's.
    (Leaking the bid price is a breach of the bidding rules.
    Impregilo recently broke the bidding rules again by declaring
    that the Sacyr-led consortium has the highest technical
    score. Absent a breach in ACP security, this information was
    unknowable at the time of the statements. ACS and Bechtel
    have both written strong protest letters to the ACP.) Post's
    Senior Commercial Officer reports that during an unrelated
    meeting, a senior ACP official accidentally stated the ACP
    price ceiling is $3.62 billion.

    -------------------------
    SACYR - POTENTIAL SPOILER
    -------------------------

    ¶5. (C) When combined the financial and technical components
    of the bid are combined in 45% and 55% proportions
    respectively, the Sacyr bid could win this "best value"
    competition. A Sacyr win could be disconcerting. Sacyr is
    considered bankrupt and is being propped up by the Spanish
    government. Therefore, besides possibly having a design that
    is not workable, a Sacyr wins adds financial risk to the
    locks construction. The bid process has protections against
    non-compliant bids, if the ACP chooses to activate the
    protections. If a bid is technically non-compliant (and the
    ACP has not detailed the exact parameters of a technically
    non-compliant bid), the ACP has the option to not even open
    the price envelope. Bechtel representatives told the
    Ambassador on June 24 that they prefer this path. If a bid
    is financially non-compliant, the ACP possibly can reject the
    offer. A bid would be financially non-compliant if a
    consortium failed a financial health audit, which will be
    conducted on the winner. All consortia were determined by
    the ACP to be financially healthy as of November 15, 2007
    during the pre-qualification phase. Based upon previous
    decisions to keep all consortia in the process, the ACP is
    not expected to disqualify any consortium.

    --------------------------------
    SACYR - RECEIVING STATE SUPPORT?
    --------------------------------

    ¶6. (C) Based upon reports from representatives from competing
    consortia, Sacyr's $50 million performance bond is backed by
    the government export credit agencies of Spain
    (CESCE-Secretaria de Estado de Comercio), France
    (COFACE-Compagnie Francaise D'Assurance Pour le Commerce
    Extereur), and Italy (SACE-Servize Assicurativi del Commercio
    Estero). Sacyr gained a competitive advantage by securing
    the near equivalent of a sovereign guarantee apparently at no
    additional cost and no additional scrutiny of their books
    (vice Bechtel and ACS who had to purchase the bond on the
    open market and subjected their firms to some level of
    financial evaluation). This arrangement goes against ACP
    Administrator Aleman's publicly expressed desire not to have
    sovereign guarantees, because the performance bond ideally
    should serve as a surrogate for a consortium's financial
    health. If a consortium could not provide the $50 million
    performance bond, then the consortium was probably not
    financially healthy. If Sacyr wins, litigation from Bechtel
    or ACS is likely. For ACS, there is the added dimension of
    why the Spanish government is helping one Spanish consortium
    and not the other. It should be noted, however, that the ACP
    has not prohibited use of export credit agencies in the
    bidding process.

    -------
    COMMENT
    -------

    ¶7. (SBU) In essence, the ACP created a transparent process
    and now - due to rigid adherence to that process - may choose
    a consortium that provides the "best value," on paper, but
    may not be capable of completing the project. It appears
    that the ACP wished to retain flexibility by not clearly
    demarcating the floor of technical non-compliance and not
    deviating from its rules to ask Sacyr for a comprehensive
    audit before the bids are open. (We understand that Sacyr may
    have provided year-to-date 2009 financial data that, due to
    the limited time window of that data, could continue to mask
    Sacyr's true financial condition.) Post will continue to
    monitor the bidding process closely to ensure fairness. Post
    maintains frequent communication with Bechtel representatives
    in order to coordinate actions to assure Bechtel is not
    unfairly disadvantaged.
    STEPHENSON

`