Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 5439 / 251,287

### Articles

Brazil Sri Lanka United Kingdom Sweden Editorial United States Latin America Egypt Yemen Jordan

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 86 88 89 90 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1986/05
1988/01
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/07 2001/10
2002/02 2002/03 2002/11
2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Amsterdam American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamburg
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan
Embassy New Delhi Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Consulate Vladivostok
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AR ASEC AEMR AORC AJ AF AMGT ACOA AO AE AU AFIN AX AMED ADCO AG AODE APER AFFAIRS AC AS AM AL ASIG ABLD ABUD AA AFU ASUP AROC ATFN AVERY APCS AER ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AEC APECO AGMT ATRN
BA BR BL BO BH BTIO BEXP BU BIDEN BM BK BY BG BE BF BB BC BBSR BMGT BRUSSELS BTIU BILAT BX
CO CS CH COUNTER CVIS CASC CDG CI CU CIS CA CBW CF CM CLINTON CMGT CN CE CJAN CONDOLEEZZA COE CR CY CG CD CTM COUNTRY CLEARANCE CPAS CWC CT CKGR CB CACS COM CJUS CARSON CL COUNTERTERRORISM CIA CACM CDB CV CAN
DR DA DHS DOE DEA DK DJ DISENGAGEMENT DS DTRA DOD DEAX
ETTC EG ECON EINV EFIN ETRD EAGR ELAB ENRG ECPS EWWT EUN EAID EU EAIR ECIN EPET ER EINT EIND EMIN ELTN EFIS EI EN ES EC EXTERNAL EINVETC ENVR ENIV EZ EINN ENGR EUR ECA ET ESA ELN ENERG EK ENGY ETRO ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS ETRDEINVTINTCS ESENV ENVI EFTA ELECTIONS ECUN EINVEFIN ECIP EINDETRD EUC EREL ECONEFIN
FR FAO FTAA FREEDOM FI FARC FBI FJ FMLN FINR
GE GG GR GM GH GTIP GV GT GOI GCC GAZA GZ GA GANGS GTMO
HUMAN HILLARY HO HA HYMPSK HR HU HURI HK HSTC
IS IAEA IC IZ IR IT ITPHUM IV IPR IWC IQ IN IO ID ICTY ISRAELI IRAQI IIP ICRC ICAO IMO IF ILC IEFIN INRB INTELSAT IL IA IBRD IMF INR IRC ITALY ITALIAN INTERPOL IRAJ INRA INRO
JOSEPH JA JO JP JOHNNIE JUS JAMES
KCRM KPAL KDEM KE KWMN KPAO KNNP KJUS KGHG KN KS KISL KTIP KDRG KSCA KCOR KIPR KTLA KIRF KV KCFC KHLS KGIC KRAD KSPR KG KZ KTFN KTIA KHIV KWBG KACT KPRP KU KAWC KOLY KCIP KCFE KOCI KPKO KTDB KMRS KFRD KLIG KBCT KICC KMCA KGIT KSTC KMDR KUNR KPAK KNEI KSEP KPOA KFLU KNUP KNNPMNUC KVPR KOMC KAWK KO KTER KSUM KHUM KRFD KBIO KBTR KDDG KWWMN KFLO KSAF KBTS KPRV KMPI KHDP KNPP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNAR KWMM KERG KFIN KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KTBT KCRS KRVC KSTH KREL KIRC KNSD KTEX KPAI KHSA KPLS KR KPWR KWAC KMIG KSEC KIFR KDEMAF KGCC KPIN KNUC KCOM KDEV
LY LE LG LH LI LU LO LOG LT
MASS MNUC MEPP MOPS MARR MTCRE MK MTRE MX MU MCAP ML MO MP MA MY MIL MDC MTCR MAR MEPI MRCRE MI MT MR MQADHAFI MD MAPS MUCN MASC MASSMNUC MERCOSUR MC MPOS MZ MOPPS MAPP MG MCC
NATO NE NS NPT NL NAR NO NI NIPP NZ NU NPG NK NSG NA NT NASA NG NGO NP NSF NATIONAL
OPDC OREP ODIP OTRA OVIP OSCE OPRC OAS OFDP OPIC OIIP OEXC OECD OPCW OSCI OIE OIC OTR OVP OFFICIALS OSAC
PGOV PTER PREL PHUM PINR PINS PARM PREF PBTS PARMS PORG PE PK PHSA PROP PO PA PM PMIL PL PTERE POL PF PALESTINIAN PY PGGV PNR POV PAK PAO PFOR PHALANAGE PARTY PRGOV PNAT PROV PEL PINF PGOVE POLINT PRL PRAM PMAR PGOVLO PHUMBA PHUS PHUMPREL PG POLITICS PEPR PSI PINT PSOE PU POLITICAL PARTIES PBIO PECON POGOV PINL PKFK PGOF
QA
RS RU RO RIGHTS RW RICE ROBERT RF RFE RP REGION
SMIG SNAR SENV SOCI SCUL SY SO SP SA SW SHUM SR SF SZ SU SL SYR ST SANC SC SAN SIPRS SK SH SI SNARCS STEINBERG SN SG
TERRORISM TSPA TH TU TO TBIO TW TX TFIN TD TRGY TSPL TZ TIP TPHY TS TK TNGD TI TC TINT TRSY TP TR TT
UNGA UNSC UK UNESCO UN UP UZ UY UE UAE UNO UNEP UG US USTR UNHCR UNMIK UNDP UNHRC USAID UNCHS UNAUS USUN USEU UNCHC UV
VE VT VM VZ VTPREL VN
WZ WMO WI WTRO WTRQ WHO WWARD WB WBG WEU WHA WTO WA
XF XM XA XL XZ XW XR XH XG XT XC XY XD XE XK XS
YM YI YE
ZI ZP ZK ZF ZB ZANU ZOELLICK ZR ZU ZA ZO ZJ

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 07SAOPAULO301,

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07SAOPAULO301.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
07SAOPAULO301 | 2007-04-16 15:03 | 2011-02-16 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Consulate Sao Paulo

`

    VZCZCXRO7121
    RR RUEHRG
    DE RUEHSO #0301/01 1061519
    ZNR UUUUU ZZH
    R 161519Z APR 07 ZDK
    FM AMCONSUL SAO PAULO
    TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6741
    INFO RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 7862
    RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 3501
    RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 7974
    RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 2701
    RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 0482
    RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION 2984
    RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO 2323
    RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 2035
    RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ 3313
    RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0256
    RUEAUSA/DEPT OF EDUCATION WASHINGTON DC
    RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
    RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
    RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL

` `

    UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 SAO PAULO 000301

    SIPDIS

    SIPDIS

    STATE FOR WHA/BSC, WHA/PDA, ECA
    NSC FOR FEARS
    DEPT OF TREASURY FOR OASIA, DAS LEE AND JHOEK
    SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD
    USAID FOR LAC/AA
    PARIS FOR ECON - TOM WHITE

    E.O. 12958: N/A
    TAGS: SCUL SOCI PGOV ECON KPAO BR

    REF: (A) BRASILIA 149;
    (B)SAO PAULO 10;
    (C) SAO 06 PAULO 1038

    ------- SUMMARY -------

    ¶1. Prominent commentators and politicians have increasingly identified deficiencies in Brazil's public education system as a leading cause of the country's subpar economic performance and its inability to keep pace with other so-called BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) economies. Recent results of standardized national tests tend to confirm these concerns, showing a marked decline in student performance over the past ten years. Last year a group of civil society, private-sector, and government leaders called Everyone for Education (EFE) launched a new, long-term education initiative to press for reform of the system and realignment of priorities. More recently, The Ministry of Education unveiled a comprehensive Plan for Educational Development (PDE), which appears to adopt many of EFE's priorities and to shift government priorities towards improving the quality of primary education. End Summary.

    -------------------------------- TEST RESULTS CONFIRM WORST FEARS --------------------------------

    ¶2. Along with social inequality - or because of it - the low quality of primary education has long been identified as the main obstacle to Brazil's economic growth and development. According to the Map of Illiteracy in Brazil, a research project conducted by the Anisio Teixera National Institute of Studies and Research on Education (a branch of the Ministry of Education), the country has 16 million illiterates and 30 million "functional" illiterates (defined as person over the age of 15 with less than four years of formal schooling). Worse yet, in February the Ministry of Education itself published the 2005 national exam results for elementary schools. The figures showed a decline in students' performance in Math and Portuguese Language compared to 10 years ago, suggesting that, far from increasing their knowledge, Brazilian students are performing worse each year.

    ¶3. The standardized national examination, created 10 years ago, is given every two years by the Ministry of Education. It includes tests in Mathematics and Portuguese designed to measure the performance of public and private school students alike. In Brazil, the educational system comprises 11 years of schooling divided into two phases. The first, called fundamental (primary) education, includes 8 years of schooling for children aged 7 to 14. The next phase, consisting of three years of schooling, is called complementary (secondary) education and is for children aged 15 to 17. In 2006, President Lula enlarged the fundamental cycle of education by one year. All children should now begin to attend school at age 6, a change that will be phased in over the next decade.

    ¶4. The 2005 results show that the students from the 4th grade (first half of fundamental education) averaged 182 in Math and 188in Portuguese on a scale from 0 to 500. According o exam standards, students at that level are suposed to score at least 300 in both exams to prov they are literate and have appropriate number skils. However, the results indicate they are fallig short. Worse yet, performance in 2005 shows adecline from 1995, when the average scores were 91 and 188 respectively.

    ¶5. The same disappointing picture is reflected in test scores from other age groups. Students from the 8th grade at the end of the "fundamental" cycle averaged 239 in Math and 232 in Portuguese. In 1995, the scores were 253 and 256. Finally, the 11th grade, near the end of complementary education, scored 271 in Math and 258 in Portuguese, decreasing from 282 and 290, respectively, in 10 years.

    SAO PAULO 00000301 002 OF 006

    ¶6. There was a little good news from the fourth-graders. Their performance shows an improvement in 2005 over their 2003 results, when they scored 169 in Portuguese and 177 in math. However, this trend was not observed among other age groups; overall scores in both subjects were lower in 2005 than in 2003. In other words, while there may be some slight short-term improvement at the lower level, elementary-school students are scoring lower on standardized tests than they did in 1995, and secondary-school students have showed a steady decline, leaving little room for optimism. The result of this failure of the education system is that many students leave the schools with little or no basic reading, writing, or numbers skills, severely limiting their value in the workforce.

    --------------------------------- HOW WE GOT HERE - A BRIEF HISTORY ---------------------------------

    ¶7. The problems exposed by the test results did not surprise experts on education. "These results just confirm what everybody who deals with education in Brazil already knows: the system doesn't work at all," said Professor Sergio Haddad, president of the NGO Educational Action. "What strikes us is why this situation has stayed the same for so long." Professor Haddad believes that the federal government in recent years has been focused on getting children into the schools rather than on improving the quality of education. In large part because of the priority placed on access to education, almost 100 percent of school-aged children are enrolled in elementary schools, a major advance over thirty years ago. Until the 1970s, the majority of public school students were from middle-class families, and poor children were largely excluded. The quality of education was excellent in those days. However, things began to change in the late 70s and early 80s. Public schools began slowly to receive students from the lower economic and social classes, increasing class size. Middle-class families started sending their children to private schools. This phenomenon became widespread in Brazil and stimulated a boom in private education for middle-class students. At the same time, several local and state governments implemented programs to encourage poor families to send their children to public schools, particularly in rural areas.

    ¶8. The "Bolsa Familia" conditional cash transfer program (ref B), for instance, was initiated under President Fernando Henrique Cardoso (1995-2003) with the name Bolsa Escola as an incentive to increase school attendance in poor families. According to many experts, the increase in attendance adversely impacted the quality of education because there was insufficient funding and administrative infrastructure to train more teachers, build new facilities, and respond to an educational clientele with special needs. Many of the new students came from dysfunctional families and/or violent neighborhoods. The overall educational strategy gave priority to quantity over quality. Bad education was deemed better than no education at all.

    ----------------- LACK OF DEMAND... -----------------

    ¶9. Professors and experts on education say that the inclusion of poor children in the educational system is no longer an excuse for providing bad education. Professor Claudio Moura Castro, former head of education policy at the Inter-American Development Bank and one of Brazil's foremost education experts, believes that investment in good education lacks political appeal to the federal government in Brazil. He cited a 2006 survey of public views on education in Brazil. The results are surprising. The poll, conducted by the Brazilian Institute of Popular Opinion and Statistics (IBOPE), shows education ranked 7th among the Brazilian people's worries, after health care, jobs, hunger, public safety, corruption and drugs. The

    SAO PAULO 00000301 003 OF 006

    survey also shows that public appreciation of education varies from one level to another across the economic and social spectrum. People from the lower classes - who are generally less educated - tend to believe that the quality of education is good or improving, while the more educated sectors of the population are much more critical. "The Lula government was re-elected by the less educated voters and, for them, there's no problem in the educational system," opined Professor Moura. "Therefore, this government has no political reason to provide a better education" and does not treat it as a priority.

    -------------------- ...AND LACK OF FOCUS --------------------

    ¶10. During Lula's first term, the federal government went through several different Ministers of Education and developed no clear policy. Cristovam Buarque, a former Governor of the Federal District (Brasilia), a 2006 presidential candidate, and now a senator from the Democratic Labor Party (PDT), gave priority to adult education. His successor, Tarso Genro, now Minister of Justice, devoted attention and resources to the higher education system. After Genro left in 2005, Fernando Haddad continued his policy of concentrating on improving universities. His priority was to get more students from the lower economic and social classes into the universities. He designed federal programs to offer loans to poor students and provide tax exemptions to private universities that accepted them. The Ministry also implemented quotas in public universities for poor and Afro-Brazilian students. Those initiatives were praised by education experts as good tools for bringing poor students into the system, but few believed that they would improve overall education quality.

    ¶11. The real problem in the eyes of many observers was a poorly defined or even misguided education policy focus. While the government was seeking to help higher education students, many protested that fundamental education needed more attention. In September 2006, a group of professors, experts, and private-sector leaders founded a movement called Todos pela Educacao (Everybody for Education - see ref C) to demand a policy shift towards primary education. It identified five main objectives to be achieved by 2022, when Brazil celebrates the bicentennial of its independence. "This group is an important tool to press the government," says Professor Maria do Carmo Brant de Carvalho, general coordinator of the Center for Studies and Research on Education, Culture and Common Action (CENPEC). She considers the group very effective and noted that the new program recently unveiled by the Lula administration appears to be consistent with the direction suggested by the movement.

    -------------------------- ROLE OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR --------------------------

    ¶12. The private sector's role in education, health and social services in Brazil is significant. Private schools account for a significant percentage of enrolled students, especially in secondary schools and universities. Private sector associations, business confederations and multinational companies have been involved for some time in efforts to train a more qualified industrial workforce. The quality of available jobs in Brazil is generally low, as illustrated by low pay, low productivity growth, high turnover, a significant decline in the number of jobs in industry, and the high percentage of jobs in the informal economy. To address this situation, programs have been created to provide education, technical know-how, and expertise in information technology to their workers as part of a process to restructure and modernize Brazilian companies to be competitive in today's global market.

    ¶13. For example, the Sao Paulo state Federation of Industries (FIESP) operates the National Industrial Apprenticeship Service

    SAO PAULO 00000301 004 OF 006

    (SENAI) to train young professionals for the industrial sector. SENAI is an educational organization for training, development, and specialization of both semi-skilled and technically trained woerkers. Both SENAI and a related organization, the Industry Social Service (SESI), are funded by mandatory monthly contributions collected by the government from industrial companies and passed to FIESP. SESI is a nationwide organization created to provide supplementary health and education services to workers and their families. The largest private organization in terms of schools and students, SESI has 600,000 students enrolled this year in a wide variety of classes. Another example is the National Center for Commercial Education (SENAC), which trains workers in trade-related areas

    ¶14. The Bradesco Foundation, operated by Bradesco Bank, is one of the oldest institutions in Brazil focused on basic education. It has 40 schools and more than 100,000 students nationwide. Individual companies have developed Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs to provide education. Some have created foundations for this purpose, while others prefer to sponsor programs developed by independent NGOs.

    ¶15. There are several independent NGOs working in Brazil to improve the quality of education. Prominent among these is the Ayrton Senna Institute - established by the family of the late race-car driver - whose programs have already reached almost seven thousand under-privileged children and young adults in the country. Likewise, the Fernand Braudel Institute of World Economics operates Reading Circles for at-risk youths in metropolitan Sao Paulo. However, all these combined efforts, while encouraging, have not been enough by themselves to turn the situation around. For this reason, the Everybody for Education movement was launched last year to coordinate civil society and private sector efforts to press government and society as a whole for a better education system.

    ------------------------------------ THE PLAN FOR EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ------------------------------------

    ¶16. In early March, Minister of Education Fernando Haddad (no relation to Professor Sergio Haddad) launched a plan focused on education quality, informally referred to as "the PAC for education" in reference to President Lula's overall economic plan, the Growth Acceleration Program (PAC). The official name of Haddad's proposal is the Plan for Educational Development (PDE). It includes some 50 items to be implemented over the next four years, among them being early (age 6-8) literacy testing, higher minimum teacher salaries, more computers and better transportation, extension of the "Bolsa Familia" maximum eligibility age from 15 to 17, and financial incentives for school districts that improve their results. The initiative earned the plaudits of experts, academics, businessmen and even opposition political parties because, as they explain, this is the first time that the government has shown a pragmatic interest in improving the quality of education instead of merely increasing the number of students in the schools. Paulo Renato Souza, who served as Education Minister under President Cardoso and is often critical of the Lula administration, praised the PDE as positive and long-overdue while noting that much will depend on how well it is implemented.

    ¶17. The program is still something of a work in progress. Minister Haddad announced its main components without providing details and is expected to present the final, comprehensive version sometime in April. In general terms, the Ministry proposes to distribute 8 billion Reals (about USD 4 billion) over four years to those cities where the students and teachers are found to be performing better. As things stand now, funds are distributed proportionally based on the number of students enrolled in each school. In order to implement this change, the government will establish goals for educational performance and ways to measure it. "The government finally accepted the idea of evaluation based on merit," said

    SAO PAULO 00000301 005 OF 006

    CENPEC's Professor Brant.

    ¶18. Experts note with approval that the new plan also embraces the idea of decentralization, since the goals will be set locally through agreements between the Ministry of Education and municipal governments. "Parents and the community would be able to work with teachers to design the goals and identify how to get there, Professor Brant explained. This would also mark the first time that the government accepts inputs from people outside the formal education system, she commented. Finally, the plan calls for children to be tested early on (between the ages of about 6 and 8) to help provide an early indication whether the system is working. If not, there would still be time to correct it.

    ¶19. This is a long-term plan. According to Minister Haddad, its results will become visible in about 14 years. In other words, the government recognizes that it will take the better part of a generation to improve the quality of education in Brazil.

    ¶20. The PDE remains at this point a bundle of good intentions, because the money is not guaranteed. The Ministry of Education can currently count on only 500 million Reals (USD 250 million) out of the requisite 8 billion Reals (USD 4 billion). Furthermore, implementation itself will be a big challenge. Brazil has three different educational systems, each with its own attributes, functions, and responsibilities. Local governments and state governments are both responsible for fundamental schools but each government has it own separate system. Besides that, municipalities run the childhood education while the states are in charge of the three last years of schooling (complementary education), and the federal government is in charge of the higher education. The states are responsible for some institutions of higher learning as well. The three levels of government, far from working well together to ensure a consistent product, devote much of their attention to competing for funding.

     ¶21. The money for the basic system comes from the Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education (FUNDEB), which is expected to have 2 billion Reals to spend in 2007. Created last year to replace an earlier program, FUNDEB is not yet fully implemented. Though the sources of funding have been identified, the government has not established how the money will be distributed among the different levels of education. This is money that local and state governments are fighting over.

    --------------------------------------------- ---- STATE TO PUSH FOR TEACHER TRAINING AND EVALUATION --------------------------------------------- ----

    ¶22. Acting CG met April 5 with Sao Paulo State Secretary of Education Maria Lucia Marcondes Carvalho Vasconcelos, who said Minister Haddad's PDE is a good initiative because of its focus on quality. In her view, the current education system is clearly not working and needs to be fundamentally changed. The key to improvement, she said, is to train teachers and regularly monitor and measure their classroom performance. She also cited the need to test students more frequently; in Sao Paulo, elementary school students progress from one year to the next without having to demonstrate their proficiency. Secretary Vasconcelos identified addressing these issues as her top priority.

    ¶23. Vasconcelos said Sao Paulo Governor Jose Serra is also pushing to improve the quality of instruction in the state education system. He is willing, if necessary, to confront the teachers' and school employees' unions in order to implement merit evaluations. Given that the local education unions are influenced by President Lula's Workers Party (PT), they are expected to mount resistance to any change. Nevertheless, Vasconcelos believes Governor Serra is genuinely committed to bringing about change and will ultimately prevail.

    SAO PAULO 00000301 006 OF 006

    ------------------------------------ MISSION SUPPORT FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION ------------------------------------

    ¶24. The U.S. Mission in Brazil works closely with the Brazilian Ministry of Education and the State Secretaries of Education to foster good management and leadership in the public schools in Brazil. Following an Embassy-sponsored Voluntary Visitor exchange visit to the U.S. a few years ago, members of CONSED (Council of State Secretaries of Education) instituted a National Prize for excellence in school management and leadership, loosely based on similar awards for school excellence they learned of in the U.S. As an added incentive for good school management, the Embassy organized an annual principals' exchange program in which each year's award-winning school principals from each of the states and the Federal District are offered a 10-day trip to the U.S. to observe U.S. public schools and interact with U.S. school principals. The exchange is two-way, as award-winning American school principals are brought to Brazil to visit award-winning Brazilian public schools, as well. The principals' exchange also results in the distribution of a publication on "Best Practices in School Management and Leadership" which is annually distributed to all public schools in Brazil.

    ¶25. Through its Youth Ambassadors program, the Mission, in partnership with public and private organizations in both countries, annually gives recognition to 20-25 outstanding, economically disadvantaged public school students from throughout Brazil who speak English and are involved in social responsibility initiatives in their communities. Now in its sixth year, the Youth Ambassadors program gives these students the opportunity to participate in a two-week exchange program in the United States. More than 10 Youth Ambassador alumni have since won substantial four-year scholarships to U.S. colleges and universities, including the University of Chicago, Smith, and Mount Holyoke.

    ¶26. Thus, although there are serious problems with Brazil's public education system, the Mission's public diplomacy programs indicate that there are nonetheless pockets of excellence, and highly motivated administrators, teachers and students in the system.

    ------- COMMENT -------

    ¶27. Education in Brazil is something of a political football. As President Lula was contemplating his post-re-election Cabinet shuffle, influential members of his Workers Party (PT) urged him to make Marta Suplicy the next Education Minister based on her record as Mayor of Sao Paulo (2001-04) and in the hopes of enhancing her chances to be elected Mayor again in 2008 and to aspire to the Presidency in 2010. Intentionally or otherwise, Minister Haddad foiled those plans by presenting the PDE and demonstrating himself to be a serious, competent administrator with some practical ideas that happen to coincide with the recommendations of outside groups. Lula had no choice but to keep him in the Cabinet to refine and implement the PDE, and Marta Suplicy ended up as Minister of Tourism. Time will tell how much of the Plan is ultimately funded and implemented, and there is plenty of room for skepticism, but the fact that the federal government appears to understand the seriousness of the situation and to want to try to fix it is in itself encouraging. End Comment.

    ¶28. This cable was coordinated with Embassy Brasilia.

    MCMULLEN

`