### Browse by Type

air mission (431) counter insurgency (4) counter-insurgency (39) criminal event (480) detainee operations (1208) enemy (13) enemy action (27078) explosive hazard (23082) friendly action (13734) friendly fire (148) non-combat event (7719) other (2752) suspicious incident (208) unknown initiated action (12)

### Browse by Category

accident (836) air assault (3) air movement (8) ambush (538) amf-on-ana (2) amnesty (1) ana-on-anp (6) anp training (283) arrest (50) arson (41) arty (77) assassination (48) attack (2283) black list (1) blue-blue (18) blue-green (10) blue-on-white (2) blue-white (6) border ops (11) breaching (2) cache found/cleared (2742) carjacking (33) cas (123) casevac (14) cca (5) checkpoint run (37) close air support (95) convoy (53) cordon/search (80) counter insurgency (8) counter mortar fire (41) counter mortar patrol (7) counter narcotic (6) counter terrorism (1) criminal activity (27) defecting (5) deliberate attack (69) demonstration (237) detain (185) detained (683) detainee release (60) detainee transfer (517) direct fire (16293) downed aircraft (13) drug operation (6) drug vehicle (2) elicitation (1) enemy action (13) equipment failure (81) erw recovered (24) erw/turn-in (58) escalation of force (2271) evidence turn-in/received (50) extortion (5) finance (3) food distribution (4) frago (404) graffiti (1) green-blue (16) green-green (72) green-white (6) hard landing (9) idf counter fire (5) idf interdiction (137) ied ambush (350) ied explosion (7202) ied false (550) ied found/cleared (8581) ied hoax (185) ied suspected (895) ied threat (10) indirect fire (7237) insurgent vehicle (9) interdiction (488) internal security forces (2) kidnapping (110) looting (11) medcap (160) medevac (3301) medevac (local national) (428) medevac (other) (64) medevac patient transfer (162) meeting (1405) meeting - development (988) meeting - security (753) mine found/cleared (396) mine strike (321) movement to contact (4) mugging (1) murder (100) narcotics (1) natural disaster (55) nbc (1) negligent discharge (19) none selected (2) other (4693) other (hostile action) (418) other defensive (30) other offensive (132) patrol (365) planned event (404) poisoning (1) police actions (24) police internal (3) premature detonation (259) project closeout (81) project start (88) propaganda (100) psyop (190) psyop (tv/radio) (2) psyop (written) (4) qa/qc project (400) raid (44) recon (33) reconnaissance (169) recruitment (willing) (1) refugees (12) released (110) repetitive activities (8) reported location (1) resupply (7) rpg (76) sabotage (6) safire (1697) search and attack (7) sectarian violence (30) security breach (1) sermon (5) show of force (2) small unit actions (32) smuggling (23) sniper ops (154) snow and ice removal (49) supporting aif (4) supporting cf (15) surrendering (4) surveillance (369) tcp (3) tests of security (22) theft (40) threat (1) transfer (399) tribal (7) tribal feud (12) turn in (840) uav (16) unexploded ordnance (2770) unknown explosion (156) vandalism (11) vehicle interdiction (11) vetcap (13) voge (29)

### Browse by Region

none selected (19) rc capital (3191) rc east (38003) rc north (2143) rc south (30234) rc west (2934) unknown (359)

### Browse by Affiliation

NATO (1342) enemy (50887) friend (13882) neutral (10471) unknown (1671)

### Browse by Date

2004-01 (138) 2004-02 (101) 2004-03 (105) 2004-04 (89) 2004-05 (194) 2004-06 (175) 2004-07 (189) 2004-08 (191) 2004-09 (192) 2004-10 (232) 2004-11 (203) 2004-12 (178) 2005-01 (136) 2005-02 (143) 2005-03 (201) 2005-04 (221) 2005-05 (387) 2005-06 (432) 2005-07 (451) 2005-08 (435) 2005-09 (558) 2005-10 (413) 2005-11 (279) 2005-12 (314) 2006-01 (305) 2006-02 (403) 2006-03 (494) 2006-04 (713) 2006-05 (700) 2006-06 (663) 2006-07 (759) 2006-08 (936) 2006-09 (1050) 2006-10 (1248) 2006-11 (1145) 2006-12 (1020) 2007-01 (1416) 2007-02 (1251) 2007-03 (1263) 2007-04 (1514) 2007-05 (1777) 2007-06 (1788) 2007-07 (1833) 2007-08 (1784) 2007-09 (1902) 2007-10 (1694) 2007-11 (1536) 2007-12 (1362) 2008-01 (1222) 2008-02 (1040) 2008-03 (1230) 2008-04 (864) 2008-05 (885) 2008-06 (869) 2008-07 (930) 2008-08 (1244) 2008-09 (1076) 2008-10 (1529) 2008-11 (1676) 2008-12 (1418) 2009-01 (1290) 2009-02 (1164) 2009-03 (1453) 2009-04 (1436) 2009-05 (2004) 2009-06 (2429) 2009-07 (3078) 2009-08 (3645) 2009-09 (3123) 2009-10 (3282) 2009-11 (2938) 2009-12 (2573)

### Browse by Severity

High (76911) Low (76911)

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page

### IDF FOB Price (Gereshk)

To understand what you are seeing here, please see the Afghan War Diary Reading Guide and the Field Structure Description
Afghan War Diary - Reading guide

The Afghan War Diary (AWD for short) consists of messages from several important US military communications systems. The messaging systems have changed over time; as such reporting standards and message format have changed as well. This reading guide tries to provide some helpful hints on interpretation and understanding of the messages contained in the AWD.

Most of the messages follow a pre-set structure that is designed to make automated processing of the contents easier. It is best to think of the messages in the terms of an overall collective logbook of the Afghan war. The AWD contains the relevant events, occurrences and intelligence experiences of the military, shared among many recipients. The basic idea is that all the messages taken together should provide a full picture of a days important events, intelligence, warnings, and other statistics. Each unit, outpost, convoy, or other military action generates report about relevant daily events. The range of topics is rather wide: Improvised Explosives Devices encountered, offensive operations, taking enemy fire, engagement with possible hostile forces, talking with village elders, numbers of wounded, dead, and detained, kidnappings, broader intelligence information and explicit threat warnings from intercepted radio communications, local informers or the afghan police. It also includes day to day complaints about lack of equipment and supplies.

The description of events in the messages is often rather short and terse. To grasp the reporting style, it is helpful to understand the conditions under which the messages are composed and sent. Often they come from field units who have been under fire or under other stressful conditions all day and see the report-writing as nasty paperwork, that needs to be completed with little apparent benefit to expect. So the reporting is kept to the necessary minimum, with as little type-work as possible. The field units also need to expect questions from higher up or disciplinary measures for events recorded in the messages, so they will tend to gloss over violations of rules of engagement and other problematic behavior; the reports are often detailed when discussing actions or interactions by enemy forces. Once it is in the AWD messages, it is officially part of the record - it is subject to analysis and scrutiny. The truthfulness and completeness especially of descriptions of events must always be carefully considered. Circumstances that completely change the meaning of an reported event may have been omitted.

The reports need to answer the critical questions: Who, When, Where, What, With whom, by what Means and Why. The AWD messages are not addressed to individuals but to groups of recipients that are fulfilling certain functions, such as duty officers in a certain region. The systems where the messages originate perform distribution based on criteria like region, classification level and other information. The goal of distribution is to provide those with access and the need to know, all of the information that relevant to their duties. In practice, this seems to be working imperfectly. The messages contain geo-location information in the forms of latitude-longitude, military grid coordinates and region.

The messages contain a large number of abbreviations that are essential to understanding its contents. When browsing through the messages, underlined abbreviations pop up an little explanation, when the mouse is hovering over it. The meanings and use of some shorthands have changed over time, others are sometimes ambiguous or have several meanings that are used depending on context, region or reporting unit. If you discover the meaning of a so far unresolved acronym or abbreviations, or if you have corrections, please submit them to wl-editors@sunshinepress.org.

An especially helpful reference to names of military units and task-forces and their respective responsibilities can be found at http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/enduring-freedom.htm

The site also contains a list of bases, airfields http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/afghanistan.htm Location names are also often shortened to three-character acronyms.

Messages may contain date and time information. Dates are mostly presented in either US numeric form (Year-Month-Day, e.g. 2009-09-04) or various Euro-style shorthands (Day-Month-Year, e.g. 2 Jan 04 or 02-Jan-04 or 2jan04 etc.).

Times are frequently noted with a time-zone identifier behind the time, e.g. "09:32Z". Most common are Z (Zulu Time, aka. UTC time zone), D (Delta Time, aka. UTC + 4 hours) and B (Bravo Time, aka UTC + 2 hours). A full list off time zones can be found here: http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/military/

Other times are noted without any time zone identifier at all. The Afghanistan time zone is AFT (UTC + 4:30), which may complicate things further if you are looking up messages based on local time.

Finding messages relating to known events may be complicated by date and time zone shifting; if the event is in the night or early morning, it may cause a report to appear to be be misfiled. It is advisable to always look through messages before and on the proceeding day for any event.

David Leigh, the Guardian's investigations editor, explains the online tools they have created to help you understand the secret US military files on the war in Afghanistan: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/datablog/video/2010/jul/25/afghanistan-war-logs-video-tutorial

Understanding the structure of the report

- The message starts with a unique ReportKey; it may be used to find messages and also to reference them.
- The next field is DateOccurred; this provides the date and time of the event or message. See Time and Date formats for details on the used formats.
- Type contains typically a broad classification of the type of event, like Friendly Action, Enemy Action, Non-Combat Event. It can be used to filter for messages of a certain type.
- Category further describes what kind of event the message is about. There are a lot of categories, from propaganda, weapons cache finds to various types of combat activities.
- TrackingNumber Is an internal tracking number.
- Title contains the title of the message.
- Summary is the actual description of the event. Usually it contains the bulk of the message content.
- Region contains the broader region of the event.
- AttackOn contains the information who was attacked during an event.
- ComplexAttack is a flag that signifies that an attack was a larger operation that required more planning, coordination and preparation. This is used as a quick filter criterion to detect events that were out of the ordinary in terms of enemy capabilities.
- ReportingUnit, UnitName, TypeOfUnit contains the information on the military unit that authored the report.
- Wounded and death are listed as numeric values, sorted by affiliation. WIA is the abbreviation for Wounded In Action. KIA is the abbreviation for Killed In Action. The numbers are recorded in the fields FriendlyWIA, FriendlyKIA, HostNationWIA, HostNationKIA, CivilianWIA, CivilianKIA, EnemyWIA, EnemyKIA
- Captured enemies are numbered in the field EnemyDetained.
- The location of events are recorded in the fields MGRS (Military Grid Reference System), Latitude, Longitude.
- The next group of fields contains information on the overall military unit, like ISAF Headquarter, that a message originated from or was updated by. Updates frequently occur when an analysis group, like one that investigated an incident or looked into the makeup of an Improvised Explosive Device added its results to a message.
- OriginatorGroup, UpdatedByGroup
- CCIR Commander's Critical Information Requirements
- If an activity that is reported is deemed "significant", this is noted in the field Sigact. Significant activities are analyzed and evaluated by a special group in the command structure.
- Affiliation describes if the event was of friendly or enemy nature.
- DColor controls the display color of the message in the messaging system and map views. Messages relating to enemy activity have the color Red, those relating to friendly activity are colored Blue.
- Classification contains the classification level of the message, e.g. Secret

Help us extend and defend this work

Reference ID | Region | Latitude | Longitude
--- | --- | --- | ---
AFG20061106n531 | RC SOUTH | 31.84217072 | 64.56199646

Date | Type | Category | Affiliation | Detained
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
2006-11-06 07:07 | Enemy Action | Indirect Fire | ENEMY | 0

| Enemy | Friend | Civilian | Host nation
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Killed in action | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0
Wounded in action | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0

`

    At 060726Z Nov 06, TFH reported 2x mortar rounds North of FF position 3 KM N of GERESHK DC (NAHRI SARRAIJ District, HELMAND Province) Assessed as ineffective. Incident closed.

` `

    Report key: 20603854-9614-469D-ABF0-1795A1D17B3A
    Tracking number: 2007-033-005323-0506
    Attack on: ENEMY
    Complex atack: FALSE
    Reporting unit: 205th RCAG
    Unit name: 205th RCAG
    Type of unit: Coalition
    Originator group: UNKNOWN
    Updated by group: UNKNOWN
    MGRS: 41RPR4780024005
    CCIR:
    Sigact:
    DColor: RED

`